Creality K2 Plus Multi-Color 3D Printer IN-DEPTH REVIEW: A True Challenger to the BambuLab X1 Carbon

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 284

  • @theelectronicsguy391
    @theelectronicsguy391 2 дня назад +64

    This is the single best review without unnecessary comments or criticism just honest review which actually helps me to decide if I should buy it or not

    • @JamStph
      @JamStph 2 дня назад +6

      Always is, the folks that run this channel along with the hostess are quite awesome! Gives me hope for the newer generation of people that will run this place one day.

    • @notchipotle
      @notchipotle 2 дня назад +2

      she often mentions the smallest bug/disadvantage that might drive some people crazy

  • @jared1321
    @jared1321 2 дня назад +25

    Golden age of consumer printing! Can’t wait to see your prusa core 1 review

    • @tangsir34
      @tangsir34 2 дня назад

      What multi color printer do you recommend creality or Bambu or Anycubic?? Regardless of the price

    • @rsilvers129
      @rsilvers129 2 дня назад

      Bambu.

    • @babamatt3o670
      @babamatt3o670 2 дня назад +1

      @@tangsir34Prusa, no waste compared

    • @jared1321
      @jared1321 День назад +1

      @@tangsir34 regardless of price would certainly be the Prusa XL but that’s quite a price. 5 tool heads eliminates waste and allows for true multimaterial printing. There are trade offs for everything when you look at more consumer priced printers. Bambu is reliable and simple, but can waste a lot of filament. Prusa mmu3 is more complex to set up and is reliant on your understanding of the machine to make it as reliable but it wastes significantly less filament and is also faster for color changes. Other color systems are newer and less proven so far like Anycubic ACE, Creality CFS(although this video looks promising) and Flashforge’s new system.

  • @Badger_S197
    @Badger_S197 2 дня назад +79

    Gold standard of 3d printer tests. Thank you for the amazing work Aurora!

  • @gman9543
    @gman9543 2 дня назад +11

    Another great review Aurora! Looks like Bambu has finally gotten Creality to up their game.
    I'll be interested in seeing some reviews from shops running these 24/7 after a month or so to see how they hold up.

  • @bretf5371
    @bretf5371 2 дня назад +17

    Finally, I can quit holding my breath waiting for this review!! Thanks for the review!!!

  • @JustinNewton1117
    @JustinNewton1117 2 дня назад +22

    the single best review channel.

  • @timothyjones7907
    @timothyjones7907 2 дня назад +13

    Getting a recommendation from aurora is literally the most authentic way to prove your product.

  • @rooktallon3141
    @rooktallon3141 2 дня назад +1

    Thank you so much for this review. Every other tech reviewer loves to put in unnecessary music without showing us how loud the printer is. You put in music but keep the sound in. As a blind person who relies on sound, this really helps. Thank you for your honest feedback without hyping the printer too much either. I personally will never buy a Bambulab printer as I can't use one because it isn't compatible with Octoprint. If I was going to buy a printer, it'd probably be this one or the Prusa Core a.

  • @ruggerovecchio
    @ruggerovecchio 2 дня назад +4

    Your thorough and honest reviews represent a remarkable contribution to the community and potentially a great chance to improve 3d printers quality, if the producers will be keen to listen. Thank you!

  • @fouroakfarm
    @fouroakfarm 2 дня назад +71

    Seems like an impressive showing. Still having trouble believing that Creality has finally grown up and has a reliable product. Ill be waiting 6-12 months and checking back. Thanks for the review!

    • @larry527az3
      @larry527az3 2 дня назад +7

      Totally agree, I'm keeping a close eye out on this one as I think it's nearly the perfect printer on paper. Time will tell...

    • @vanrensburgarchitecturebim1641
      @vanrensburgarchitecturebim1641 2 дня назад +23

      Same for me, as with the Qidi Plus4, the first month of glowing praise was followed by the reality of glaring flaws.
      RUclips reviews are a minefield of paid-for and poorly researched/tested reviews.

    • @Feibie
      @Feibie 2 дня назад

      ​@@vanrensburgarchitecturebim1641is Nathan Builds Robots and Auroratech pretty sure aren't sponsored or paid off by the manufacturers. NBR actually very critical of manufacturers and I got a feeling he's somewhat soft black listed by Bambulab for example

    • @EvilSewnit
      @EvilSewnit 2 дня назад +6

      Knowing creality there will be a new version by then

    • @81GTUN4
      @81GTUN4 2 дня назад +2

      my Qidi 4 has been so very impressive.

  •  День назад +2

    Thank you for going into more detail about the flow calibration start-up procedure. That has been keeping me on the fence, I just might make a purchase now that i see this can be used as a reliable tool to just simply work.
    I still want to see what Bamboo will come up with but if its too 'prosumer', they're going to loose out to Creality with me.
    I have a 340mm printer now and the X1C is just too small for my needs. K2 Plus came on scene first and might be what wins me over.
    Ball is in your court now, Bamboo. Lets see what youve got.

  • @jonathanballoch
    @jonathanballoch 2 дня назад +9

    This is an incredible review but I AM SO EXCITED FOR YOU TO REVIEW THE PRUSA CORE ONE

    • @leonardojoy
      @leonardojoy 2 дня назад

      me too

    • @jeremyjpegan
      @jeremyjpegan День назад

      Im new to the space and looking to get either the K2 Plus or the X1C. Im leaning toward the K2 because of bed size. Or do I wait to see what Bambu releases next? Help me!!!!

    • @KJMcLaws
      @KJMcLaws 9 часов назад

      ​@@jeremyjpegan there is always something better around the corner. If you always wait you'll never get anything. If the current offering satisfies your needs I suggest to pull the trigger. I have an X1C and I really want the K2 plus simply to have a larger format printer with similar features. However I've already spent my money and have to wait a while before I can justify spending more. Supposedly the P1S is very competitive to the X1C if you were looking to get into something now and save some money for a future investment.

    • @jeremyjpegan
      @jeremyjpegan 8 часов назад

      @ thank you for the reply. I appreciate the advice.

  • @Zsub1
    @Zsub1 2 дня назад +8

    Laughed out loud at the "Agree to whatever it says screen" :D

  • @shervin2
    @shervin2 2 дня назад +12

    This is the video we've waited for!

  • @johnh.miller1112
    @johnh.miller1112 2 дня назад +6

    I still don’t trust Creality after the K1 fiasco. I had to buy 15 K1’s to get 4 “good” ones. No thanks Creality hype and beta testing for me! I’ll take the $1,500. and buy 7 Bambi A1 minis and get way more productivity.
    $1,500. is a lot of dough to tie up in one printer and if it breaks you’re screwed.
    Also I’ll wait and see what Bambu has up their sleeves for their next large printer. I’ll bet they’ll kick the pants off Creality and others.

  • @philipershler420
    @philipershler420 2 дня назад

    Thank you for a very complete review and an objective assessment of the system speed and accuracy. While not everything is perfect, it seems for many of the issues you found and described, there is at least some hope that many of these issues can be resolved going forward.
    This is the best description and review of the K2 Plus with the CFS that I have seen on the internet. I can hardly wait for mine to be delivered, hopefully early in December. 🤞

  • @JustinLCooper
    @JustinLCooper 2 дня назад +18

    Creality strikes back. Also the 350x350x350 build volume is a major plus. Excellent review.

    • @testjeaapiel9707
      @testjeaapiel9707 2 дня назад +7

      it took them 3 years and a second try to get here. but only because Bambu was ahead. without bambu creality never would gone up in quality.

    • @scarfa21
      @scarfa21 2 дня назад +3

      @@testjeaapiel9707 ohh god another bambu sheep give it a break

    • @riba2233
      @riba2233 2 дня назад +4

      @@scarfa21 he is right though

    • @kwedl
      @kwedl 2 дня назад +7

      @@testjeaapiel9707 And without other printers before them Bambu wouldn't even exist. Stop acting like Bambu invented 3D printing or as if they are the only good printers out there. Why is no other company allowed to improve things or release a corexy?

    • @testjeaapiel9707
      @testjeaapiel9707 2 дня назад +1

      @@kwedl
      who cares they are both chinees....
      im merely stating economic facts, indeed plenty of other 3d producing companys arround who are EXPENSIVE, bambu is the only succesfull competitor of creality in their price range and they stepped it up a notch. it forces everyone else to do the same or no more customers!
      Purely cuz the scale of the bambu investors alone this was possible. anny idea how much a plastic injection molding machine cost a piece?

  • @rescuemethod
    @rescuemethod День назад

    Great review as usual but a few points, it would be great to always speak to these points, as they have a huge effect on the user experience:
    1) NOZZLE: quick change nozzle? how easy or hard to change the nozzle and how expensive/cheap are they? how easy hard to clear a clogged nozzle?
    2) AIR QUALITY: can we keep the printer enclosed and vent the air so no particulate matter ends up in our lungs? how easy to attach an exhaust hose/fan to the back or side, if there's a port? or do I have to drill into the frame? and does that hold on securely or not? with some filaments, its best to print in an open frame printer, but I don't want to breath the particulate matter....nobody talks about this, but having a printer with a port, ready to attach the exhaust hose would be super great. Thanks Aurora!

  • @3DandTeePrinting
    @3DandTeePrinting 2 дня назад +14

    The 3D Printing Review Queen is speaking. I am listening intently.

  • @Liberty4Ever
    @Liberty4Ever 2 дня назад

    Great review as always. You test a wide range of performance that matter to those buying a 3D printer, in real world tests. Best of all, you have a standard test suite that allows us to compare performance between 3D printers.

  • @awildridehome9469
    @awildridehome9469 2 дня назад +9

    There's... *a lot* of VFA on the prints you showed off. Pause and zoom in, and go compare it to the other CoreXY reviews she has done. Creality is not beating the allegations with this one.

    • @FlowForm.design
      @FlowForm.design 2 дня назад +2

      I agree, on some of the boxes the VFA was quite evident 😮 also the tall prints quality was not great

  • @SirTodd
    @SirTodd 2 дня назад

    this channel and your reviews are the only ones I can't wait to see and guide my judgement 100%. thank you for the spectacular reviews and very valuable information 🙏
    now, I can't wait to see the Prusa CoreOne vs K2 Plus vs Bambu X1 Carbon! I already know the Prusa lacks the print volume, but I'm more concerned about performance and quality anyway.

  • @JakobDam
    @JakobDam 2 дня назад

    Very nice and thorough review - and the detail with closed loop stepper motors really earns Creality a big star in my book. This has taken WAY too long to implement in consumer grade 3D printers. Although I just bought my second P1S, the K2 Plus seems to be a very solid machine, and a good indicator where we're headed in the consumer 3D printing world. I learned a few things about the K2 Plus that I wasn't previously aware of.

  • @martinlightheart693
    @martinlightheart693 22 часа назад

    Great review! Good choice of music, nothing loud and annoying. I just subscribed.

  • @supadeluxe
    @supadeluxe 2 дня назад

    Great to see comparison with other printers. I just got a K1C partly based on your video. Guess I'll have to save up for a K2 now!

  • @WreckDiver99
    @WreckDiver99 22 часа назад

    One of the better reviews I've seen. Nice job. I've almost pulled the trigger on the K2 Plus 5 or 6 times. It's a chunk of money, but darn that bed size is sweet and I really need something that big for many of my shop designs.
    My other thing is I believe Creality only sent like 20 of these units out for reviews...and knowing from other past experiences, many things show up once these are fully available.
    As for your cons...I don't think any of them are massive concerns, nuisances for sure.
    Thank you for doing such a good job, and including the Bambu Labs as comparisons, though how good is the Bambu Labs for tall items such as the garbage can?

  • @burnsyd17
    @burnsyd17 2 дня назад

    It seems very nice from your as usual comprehensive first look. That said, I'm not left regretting the X1C Combo i bought last week via Bambu Black Friday sale.

  • @thepotter2006
    @thepotter2006 2 дня назад +1

    was def waiting for this one with bated breath. much appreciated review

  • @Irek_Poland
    @Irek_Poland 2 дня назад

    Dziękuję za ten film.
    Poczekam na świąteczny szał i po nowym roku kupię ją.
    Zapewne w dużo niższej cenie.

  • @RaulGerardoHuertasPaiva
    @RaulGerardoHuertasPaiva 2 дня назад

    First worthy review of this printer. And it's actually a real competitor. Even better than the Prusa Core One!

  • @RoofusKit
    @RoofusKit 18 часов назад

    I really appreciate your videos as there's not many, if any, other channels that do such a consistent side by side comparison with machines. I want to point out though that a lattice box is not a good warp test for ABS. Solid walls would do a better job testing for warping and bed adhesion as they are more likely to pull as each layer cools and shrinks.

  • @Ronoaldo
    @Ronoaldo 2 дня назад

    As usual, your reviews are superb 🎉. Thank you so much for such in-depth review ❤

  • @DrZylvon
    @DrZylvon 2 дня назад +1

    very nice review and impressed by this machine! thanks !
    ...just a thought, I think we're reaching a point where your protocol could perhaps evolve ?Many printers have levelled around the X1C kind of quality and speed. Now we should have a look at the finer details & new differentiatores. Some ideas : VFA testing, air filtration system efficiency, heat temperature control consistency / heat evenness (IR camera), etc...

  • @to-mi1949
    @to-mi1949 2 дня назад

    Thank you for making those videos! They are really helpful!
    Wondering if you could include a test for fine/micro details? For example test how well they are doing with something like skin or leather texture of variying depths and sizes.
    As someone who prints miniatures, this would give me an idea of how well the printers are with small details.

  • @awood12345
    @awood12345 2 дня назад +1

    If I hadn't have already bought a Bambu then I would have bought this based on your review. The larger area would be beneficial to me and it seems that caught up with Bambu's technology.

    • @rsilvers129
      @rsilvers129 2 дня назад +1

      Getting there but she had an extensive list of cons that was mostly stuff Bambu had perfected 2 years ago.

  • @Acronis7878
    @Acronis7878 17 часов назад

    straight to the point. This the way reviews should be done.

  • @bryancampbell4604
    @bryancampbell4604 2 дня назад

    Thank you for this amazing review, as always. This looks like it will be a great competitor to Bambu. Even though it is basically a copy. Keep up the great work you two!

  • @NunoPereira
    @NunoPereira 2 дня назад

    This is a beast machine, a top printer. Aurora you need a Oscar for this review.

  • @ingGS
    @ingGS 2 дня назад +1

    The subtle humor was a nice touch to on otherwise excellent and complete video.

  • @RaymondCHowes
    @RaymondCHowes 2 дня назад

    Dare I say? Your voice has matured from your earlier videos. Always like listening to your reviews.
    Now the tough part!
    Which one do I want to choose from?
    Bambu labs or Creality?

  • @3dnovice-en6is
    @3dnovice-en6is 2 дня назад

    Very happy to see this review. As always it was excellent. Did you have many failed prints? Also, since it has a heated chamber, do you plan to do more testing with abs and other heat sensitive filaments?

    • @AuroraTech
      @AuroraTech  2 дня назад

      I would consider the Hello Kitty print a failure due to insufficient flushing volume. Aside from that, I haven’t experienced any failed prints so far.

  • @nheather
    @nheather 2 дня назад

    Fantastic video, the K2 looks excellent, though not sure I need a printer that big, but it is great to see some competition for Bamboo Labs.

  • @Guardian_Arias
    @Guardian_Arias 2 дня назад +2

    Fantastic video, although i wish you had delved deeper into what klipper things could be done on this machine. Like is it actually open or is it just marketing. Can you edit the config files. Can you crate or edit macros. Perhaps show if things like obico or moonraker can be installed or uninstall as one desires.

    • @AuroraTech
      @AuroraTech  2 дня назад

      There is an option to select root access, which means you can technically do whatever you want on the Linux system.

  • @JingleStic
    @JingleStic День назад

    Take a Sub. Amazing review. Straight to the point. Great comparisons. My K2 came in yesterday. Broke foot from shipping. Its a monster.

  • @DanielHarcha
    @DanielHarcha День назад

    Fantastic videos, really appreciate your methodical approach to testing. Thanks for making this content!!

  • @Jemsbsg
    @Jemsbsg 2 дня назад

    The best review so far, congrats.

  • @kipbeegle8260
    @kipbeegle8260 2 дня назад

    Another fantastic review! You answered many of my questions and concerns. I cant believe Creality finaly put out a machine that is, so far, so hardware reliable. The fact you didnt point out any hardware issues moves this to the top of my next printer list. Software shortcoming are always to be expected for the launch so I am not worried about those. I also heard that when you open the K2 up creality has stopped hot glueing everything in sight. Can you confirm that? I hated that on my now ancient Ender 5 plus when doing upgrades. I am waiting to see if Flashforge releases a large format printer first and see how that stacks up with the K2 and the X1 carbon. But that is for after the holidays.

  • @saschabonez6205
    @saschabonez6205 2 дня назад

    The only good video currently available on the printer. Glad to have found the channel definitely very good content.

  • @learobinson
    @learobinson День назад

    Amazing review, as always. I've always avoided Creality like the plague due to the poor quality, false advertising and low morals but lately they seem to be putting the effort in to make better products. Due to this and the specs on paper for the K2 plus (BIG bed, multicolour, heated chamber) I grabbed one of the cheap pre order machines. I wouldn't have invested in this machine at full price. Your mostly positive review has put me at ease though, if you say it's good then it will be.

  • @hobbyistnotes
    @hobbyistnotes 2 дня назад +7

    Very interesting machine and nice review of it. Finally we have some Bambu competitor with bigger print bed size. Will be very interesting to see how fast community will adopt the CFS to run on other printers. There are ton of cardboard spools I wish you would show in details how well those fits and if it's even compatible with cardboard spool with printed rings. PS: I print ton of ABS with 100(C) PEI bed on Enclosed CoreXY printers without extra heaters in my garage without any glue stick and fail rate the same as PLA prints, for me glue stick is a ghost from the past.

    • @Rostol
      @Rostol 2 дня назад

      yes, hopefully this will finaly be incentive enough for bambu to release their larger bed printer with an imporoved A1 mini AMS (far superior to the x1c's an p1s') I would've bet they'd released it in november before the holidays, but nope. hopefully next year.

  • @davedempsey5282
    @davedempsey5282 2 дня назад

    Wow Creality finally gets it together and delivers.

  • @Camaro45th
    @Camaro45th День назад

    Great video. I keep watching these k2+ videos but can’t afford one.
    I really like your straight to the point review and testing. I’m sure people will be rooting the printer if not done already but if they root the printer they can install kamp to allow for calibration on the printing area instead of the entire bed.
    As far as the camera feed goes it’s the same story with the k1 series camera. I have found that the camera feed is much more reliable when using fluidd or a 3rd party app like OctoApp/Octoeverywhere. I don’t understand why Creality doesn’t address this issue for all of their printers and cameras.

  • @larry527az3
    @larry527az3 2 дня назад

    Excellent review Aurora, this is a printer I'm very seriously considering. Thank you!

  • @Ryxxi_makes
    @Ryxxi_makes 2 дня назад +3

    RUclipsrs shilling harder than ever. Here I am trying to charge back creality because they cant even support their 5months old filament dryer and have the audacity to ask me to buy a new one from jacked up black friday sale.

  • @FranklyWry
    @FranklyWry 2 дня назад

    Your usual excellent analysis is much appreciated.

  • @atnfn
    @atnfn 5 часов назад

    Guess Nathan wasn't lying this time. Looks like this is better than the X1C in almost every way. Although I'll stick with my X1C and A1 till they break. I don't need anything better. Basically costs the same as an X1 but you get 100mm more volume in every direction and it's noticeably faster as well. Looks like the carbon rod nonsense that Bambu used wasn't required either. Or the Lidar, if this just uses a regular camera. The Bambu X1C is also mostly built out of plastic, except for the frame, while this seems to be mostly from metal.

  • @wilfredgandarilla1973
    @wilfredgandarilla1973 День назад

    Love all your videos. Would you guys consider making a video on all these different build plate materials (PEP, PES, PEL, PEB......) ive been seeing lately. I cant seem to find any videos on what they are or best used for.

  • @john_beardon
    @john_beardon 2 дня назад +1

    Great review as always but it would have been nice to know what version of Klipper is in use and whether it has either the Fluidd or Mainsail interface as well as the rather basic Creality offering.
    I will be honest and say with my experience of Creality printers, the K2 almost seems too good to be true and I worry whether reviewers are getting inventory that has undergone very strict QC processes that will not be maintained on general release. Time will tell but I will not be dropping any cash on one for at least 6 months.

    • @AuroraTech
      @AuroraTech  2 дня назад

      There is an option to select root access, which means you can technically do whatever you want on the Linux system.

  • @psx1986
    @psx1986 11 часов назад

    Cant wait! Mine arrives next week!

  • @SylvainDuford
    @SylvainDuford 2 дня назад

    Looks like it's a great printer. I'm waiting for the non-plus version, this one is simply too big for me. Thanks for another detailed and objective review.

  • @Ronoaldo
    @Ronoaldo 2 дня назад +1

    The "Agree to wherever it says screen" is now the way I'll call it from now on 😀

  • @woodcat7180
    @woodcat7180 2 дня назад

    Looks like Creality has a winner on their hands.

  • @kitmarshall4084
    @kitmarshall4084 День назад

    thanks for the review, really thinking about getting this machine to replace my old and venerable Prusa MK2s

  • @atienne_navarre
    @atienne_navarre 2 дня назад +1

    Seems nice but seeing as it is Creality, I'm going to wait and see what Bambu comes out with next spring.

  • @TheLiddokun
    @TheLiddokun 6 часов назад

    The purple retraction test box was insanely better then the x1c. Can you share the full settings for the print? Retraction length, speed, hop, etc. Did you check the x1c settings?

  • @jordangarside
    @jordangarside 2 дня назад +1

    It would be awesome to have some dimensional accuracy tests (cube and cylinder measured with calipers).
    Bambu has dimensional accuracy issues with round/cylindrical prints (always ~0.2mm undersized compared to cubes of the same size so you can't fix with calibration).

  • @Brinslade
    @Brinslade 2 дня назад

    Excellent review! So detailed and clear. Thank you.

  • @linassapnagis2174
    @linassapnagis2174 День назад

    I like those reviews, it’s close what we want, but not as deep as we want, maybe need more time to get done ❤

  • @ofmtech7453
    @ofmtech7453 2 дня назад

    It would be nice to see the high details prints in a more mat PLA, that would let the details pop more and the inconsistencies too

  • @dominickcano1392
    @dominickcano1392 2 дня назад +1

    A little hesitant. The channel have the Anycubic Kobra 2 Max a good review, but have more problems than successes with that machine and on another channel the K2 Plus is only optimized to print multi color at a .20 layer height. Which isn't his for finer detail prints. Hopefully it can be resolved through am update. Since the K2 comes with a high for nozzle it is naturally going to be quicker than other colors xy printers.

  • @mttkl
    @mttkl День назад

    Competition is good for consumers! This is an amazing detailed review and the K2+ seems to tick all the boxes, but after the K1 fiasco (and other reliability issues from Creality in general) I won't trust any review that's not long term :/
    I know everyone is going to compare it to Bambu, but friendly reminder that the X1C is almost 3 years old (!) and the K2+ is barely matching the quality (although in true Creality fashion, many users are already reporting bad and inconsistent quality) while still missing on the overall user experience and advanced sensors.

  • @seansersmylie
    @seansersmylie 2 дня назад

    Great review as always!

  • @Viperwon
    @Viperwon 2 дня назад

    The best review chan out there

  • @JustinNewton1117
    @JustinNewton1117 2 дня назад +2

    only issue i have with the K2 is you cannot sit the cfs to the side with the combo version. you need a longer cord to reach. kind of a bad deal when already spending 1500

  • @Walt1119
    @Walt1119 2 дня назад

    Great review as always! This machine is very impressive, my k1 Max works well also. Thanks so much for sharing w us!!

  • @jayrydah13
    @jayrydah13 2 дня назад +1

    Yesss!!! I actually already ordered my K2 plus combo a couple days ago. I already have 4 bambu printers but i wanted the bigger plate for bigger cosplay pieces

  • @yuyaolin7861
    @yuyaolin7861 День назад

    May will be have a Creatlity K2 Max, I’m waiting for.

  • @Zalazane
    @Zalazane 2 дня назад +1

    Hi, good review, when will the Sovol SV06 Ace review come out for us with a limited budget? Thank you.

    • @riba2233
      @riba2233 2 дня назад

      just get the A1

    • @AuroraTech
      @AuroraTech  2 дня назад +2

      It was scheduled for December, but I'm considering moving it up and doing it sooner.

    • @Zalazane
      @Zalazane 2 дня назад +1

      @@AuroraTech Thank you for the response! Sounds great.

  • @Waltkat
    @Waltkat 2 дня назад

    Great review. Well done. Too bad I can't afford to buy one of these. I'll stay with my K1 Max for now and maybe get a Bambu Lab A1 Mini in the near future for multi color printing. I would prefer to stay with Creality though because I've had great results from my 10 year old first generation Ender 3 and K1 Max.

  • @Jokaerosin
    @Jokaerosin 2 дня назад +2

    As always thank you !:)))

  • @awilliams1701
    @awilliams1701 2 дня назад +1

    hmm it can print PLA fully enclosed..... like the prusa core one!! lol I hope to see that on the channel soon.

  • @MrAdventureTime
    @MrAdventureTime 2 дня назад

    Great review, keep it up 👍

  • @txtrader512
    @txtrader512 2 дня назад

    the biggest issue with retracting filament completely out of the hotend is an increased number of jams (especially with PLA). cutting it off and shoving the remaining amount through drastically reduces the chances of this happening. I'll take a little extra waste instead of having to deal with clearing PLA wedged into the cold size of the nozzle any day.

  • @Vault_Phil
    @Vault_Phil День назад

    Hi AuroraTech, I was enjoying watching your review and found it very informative but I find it impossible to finish when there is a 45 second ad break every 3-4 minutes.

  • @rsilvers129
    @rsilvers129 2 дня назад +1

    Your cons are good feedback for them. Also the Z wobble is not that good in some of the prints in every video I have seen.

  • @runesvensson1244
    @runesvensson1244 2 дня назад +1

    Reliability and ease of maintenance is important to me. Don't know if I should get a Creality K2 or a Bambu.

  • @jeremiahlopez937
    @jeremiahlopez937 2 дня назад +3

    There are a ton of VFAs in those prints... 🙄

  • @roblutter
    @roblutter 2 дня назад

    I just don't know that I can go back to Creality. The Ender broke my spirit years back. I want a certainly want that build volume though. Ugh. Ugh. Ha.
    I do believe you more than any other channel @Aurora Tech

  • @davdav1181
    @davdav1181 День назад

    Love your work.

  • @DeusExAstra
    @DeusExAstra 2 дня назад

    Excellent review, thank you!

  • @olafb.2929
    @olafb.2929 День назад

    A great review, thank you.

  • @michaelreaves1121
    @michaelreaves1121 2 дня назад +1

    Informative. Thank you!

  • @selwyn_dev
    @selwyn_dev 2 дня назад

    Please provide tpu testing information with dried filament. Every printer will print dirty with dirty filament, that is a review of dirty filament and not the printer. Excellent review overall though. 🤙🏾

  • @jamincollins
    @jamincollins 21 час назад

    Would love to know more about how you tested the chamber heater. Based on my unit, Creality does not provide an M191 implementation, only an M141 (current firmware as of this writing). As such, the unit will not wait for the chamber to reach a desired temperature. Furthermore, in testing with just the chamber heater, I was not able to reach 55c.

  • @kernelpanic-x64
    @kernelpanic-x64 2 дня назад +2

    11:33
    Is it just me or do the numbers really look that terrible with the ghosting around it?
    But it's on both devices.
    Could printing slower reduce that?

    • @CL-gq3no
      @CL-gq3no 2 дня назад

      Slowing it down would definitely help with that. Considering how fast these printers are going and that those numbers on a flat surface are basically a torture test for "ringing", it's not bad at all. Slowing it down a bit would probably eliminate it completely and still be way faster than any bed slingers out there.

  • @floodo1
    @floodo1 2 дня назад

    Also really wild how creality knocked off the UI, like d00d at least change the colors

  • @Makeringedients
    @Makeringedients 2 дня назад +3

    Nice video, BUT it is sponsored and claims to be an unbiased review.... This doesn't rhyme well in my opinion. Getting a printer sent without strings attached is one thing, but getting paid for an "unbiased review" is losing credibility in my book. I can't trust the nuances are conveyed as they would in a no strings attached scenario. My 2c.

    • @CL-gq3no
      @CL-gq3no 2 дня назад

      Did she say creality paid them?

    • @Makeringedients
      @Makeringedients 2 дня назад +2

      @@CL-gq3no Yes she said it was a sponsored video at the end of the intro some 3:30 into the video

    • @CL-gq3no
      @CL-gq3no 2 дня назад

      @@Makeringedients, I didn't catch that. thanks. I think they would still be honest in their review, but you have a point.

    • @tabooretka
      @tabooretka 8 часов назад

      If someone trusts RUclips influencers I have a bridge to sell... Notice how often influencers list pros and "cons" but cons usually are something insignificant like "first time you turn on you do calibration then need to do it again...." while ignoring real issues like significant vertical artifacts.

  • @LimHonggeun1
    @LimHonggeun1 2 дня назад

    With the increased bed size of the K2 Plus, it must require more processing power. Were there any issues with insufficient performance?

  • @ryan72350
    @ryan72350 2 дня назад

    What speed did you print the petg at? Did you have to slow the machine down for that material?

    • @AuroraTech
      @AuroraTech  2 дня назад

      The volumetric speed for PETG is set to 15 mm³/s. At a 0.2 mm layer height, this translates to 187.5 mm/s, and at a 0.3 mm layer height, it becomes 125 mm/s.

  • @rabenklang7
    @rabenklang7 2 дня назад

    thank you! It would be nice to get a comparison to the Prusa Core one, it might be queter and more efficent with its mmu, and has a great planetary extruder.