my philosophy to photography is, get the best gear you can afford if it's your hobby; get only moderately adequate gear if it's your job. let's not kid ourselves. 99.99% of your clients won't notice the difference between a tamron 24-70 and a nikkor 24-70. the only reason you want to upgrade to the latter is that you have a pair of trained eyes and have noticed the tiny difference, not because clients feedbacks have forced you to. same goes to camera bodies. in another word, the fastest way to turn profit in the photography business is to not over estimate your client's expectations. do that, and you'll have a much more reasonable spending habit on your business. upgrade your kills before upgrading your gear.
You nailed the point! Great comment! As a real estate photographer I bought the 14-24 Nikon twice (broke once) because I saw the difference between the chromatic aberration and the "removable" barrel distortion. And I have a look on agencies working with other photographers who use goPro or just some really awful technique, also the photos are oversaturated and so on, and so on. I want the cheapest gear which does the job as well. I almost never deliver photos over 3200x2135 resolution. I know how it is when you brake 3000€ with a bad movement. I would rather have 2 pieces of D750 in my bag than a D850. I bought my D750 when it was new. I have just noticed that it became right just now around 70k expos. It gains almost no dust anymore. I decided to buy another one if no D760 comes out this year. but surely would buy rather a used one with 20k shots than a new.
I find it both amazing and amusing how obsessed young photographers are with new 📷 bodies; changing them like socks. Wiser and experienced photographers long ago realized investing in good glass along with focusing on composition and in camera knowledge with a familiar camera body, pay off in higher dividends.. than those wasting time and money constantly jumping to the newest body. Never ceases to amaze me when 3 generation old body users make the cover, while new camera photographers place 3rd. Sadly a explanation for this phenomena often falls on deaf ears.
James, maybe you are not aware, but digital cameras are very different from film cameras. A film photographer could invest in a single camera and stick with it for much of his career and never have to upgrade, whereas the same cannot be said for digital photographers who want to remain competitive. With resolutions ever increasing and camera sensors ever evolving, these days the camera you use actually matters more than it used to. In the past, the film you chose was more often than not vastly more important than the camera it was inside. Times have changed and if you think you're being "wise" to stick with a first or second generation DSLR, then the only thing I can say is that you are ignorant and stubborn, and young photographers would be better served listening to someone who actually understands what is going on in the world of photography. Also, James, "phenomena" is the plural form of "phenomenon". The two are not interchangeable. For some reason, people think they sound smarter when they say "phenomena" instead of "phenomenon" without realizing that they are using it wrong. But you're so wise and experienced, so...
@@kwisclubta7175 Maybe you are not aware, being so young and arrogant, but the occurrence noted by James R is well known and has been documented by writers for decades, now. Pro photogs routinely stick to older cameras that are working for them. D3s and D4s are still in use and earning money for pros who understand this "phenomenon". It's the ignorant children of photography who think only the very latest gear will keep you working. Also, note that James has 10 times the number of likes that your comment has.
The capabilities needed by today’s working professionals are ever growing and changing. The canon 5D mkiii for instance was and still is a fantastic photography tool. However, many photographers are also videographers. The 1080p of the 5Dmkiii just doesn’t cut it anymore. People that do not upgrade to the better 4k capable cameras, lose work. This has nothing to do with ability or knowledge. TV, computer screens and even phone screens are so advanced now that customers are demanding the best quality videos. Even as far as photography is concerned, having a modern camera with ultra lowlight capability, low light af and eye autofocus means that the photogs can get many more keepers in a modern wedding which is more and more often held in the afternoon and into the evening. Whereas in the past, weddings were usually held during the daytime. I am in both camps. I shoot a new canon r5 for video but shoot an ancient Pentax 67 and a 4x5 film cameras for portraits. There is a place for everything and a reason to change gear as often as someone wants. Cheers
the d750 is nikons best DSLR. The D850 is great on a tripod. So is the D750 but the D750 is great in the hand with lots of different lenses and still amazing images that can be used for fairly large photographs that most normal people would display. Th D750 has the best sensor processor combo on any nikon camera.
The D850 is great on a tripod? Most cameras are. i have a d850 and i have used a 750- the 750 is the same 24mp of the 600,610.. its quicker, not much quicker. The D850 is a different beast, if you start using its creative tools ... then there isn't much competition.
I own a D750 and love it, but there is no reason to ever purchase a D750 over a D850 unless price is a concern. The D850 is on another level by comparison. I also own a D500 as well and if you are purchasing a D850 or D500, you are a person that doesn't use a pop-up flash and have a separate flash already. You are right about the D750 ISO performance, but from my research the D850 ISO performance is still better. D850 has better autofocus, focus peaking and stacking, 7-9frames a second (9 with battery Grip) touch screen display, even in the menu, rugged magnesium body, XQD, better buffer, ISO as low as 64, 4k video,need I go on. This is a studio/landscaper's dream camera A better comparison, would have been with the D5, maybe, but you are right the D750 is a great camera, just not in the same league.
From personal experience with my D850, the ISO performance is great, but I wouldn’t say it is fantastic. The D750 grain structure, to my eye is a much more consistent and tighter structure. I personally could care less about a pop up flash because I never use them, however I do know some people use them as controllers for other wireless flash units. Autofocus is as always, excellent. There really is no debate about that. Focus peaking is excellent, but mostly useless to most photographers, unless you’re using live view. You’re right about build quality and of course the cards will be much faster. Good thoughts!
When I purchased a second body for wedding jobs, I decided to buy a second D750 over a D850 because I didn’t want to think about the different button placement when I switched camera bodies throughout the day. I agree with the video, the D750 is an excellent wedding camera, and it is nice to have two. I do however want a D850 for the wedding formals, but that’s the only time I would switch to that body during the wedding.
One thing not mentioned, with regard to the D850 having an ISO button, I personally rarely take 'video' so my red video button, next to the shutter, is set up just as the D850's ISO button! Simple, very effective.
It’s very simple to make the RED record button on the D750 the ISO button - extremely simple and that negates the point about the ISO button on the D850 being in a better spot. They are virtually the same when you do this.
Hey Brian! It’s actually a funny story about that. I had no idea that I could do that until someone commented on this video and told me 😂😂. I know now though! Thanks for the tip!
For most of my needs, the D750 is perfect. I love the IQ from it, and the fact that it is WAAAAAY cheaper than the D850 is a big plus. I mean, I could get the Tamron 15-30 2.8 and 24-70 2.8 plus the D750 for same price as the D850 body only... so it makes more sense for me
I find that I can apply more noise reduction on the D850 whilst maintaining detail with the higher resolution. The lack of an AA filter also allows me to ramp up the noise reduction. The processed images look very clean, and allow for a lot more post processing headroom. The D750 is very good, but after processing the D850 files look better. I noticed that my D500 files are also way better than my old 6D full frame - again sharper detail due to a lack of AA filter allows for greater headroom when applying noise reduction. You shouldn't consider ISO performance on it's own, other elements go towards producing cleaner images post processed.
Make it simple, the D750 is still a good choice for high iso performance. But when it come to wildlife or landscape, you will need D500 or D800/810. Or just buy D850 you will cover all type of photography, plus a ton of new technologies in it
I wouldn't count the D500 out in the high ISO area. I've shot at 6400 ISO on mine with excellent results at football and basketball games. Even tested it at ISO 51,200 with usable results: facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10208075885014617&l=194499f956
"But when it come to wildlife or landscape, you will need D500 or D800/810" I have to love this train of thought, it's so quaint and endearing, indicative of the tech consumer bubble. What you are basically saying, to me here, is that examples of landscape photography before these cameras existed are all junk. You don't *need* anything like the features on such cameras to take great landscapes and wildlife photos. I wonder how many people who desire these DSLRS actually print large format or whether they just pixel peep on a lap top or upload compressed to Flickr or Instagram. I get the impression most think the camera is going to do the entire job for them. It makes their work lazy. They incessantly fuck around with the images in Lightroom anyway. I remember asking someone if they' used particular filter on an image being displayed and they acknowledged they had, no problem there, but she said she'd wanted the image to have a dusk kind of light when she'd actually taken the image say mid afternoon. In my head I'm thinking why didn't you just go out at dusk?
You need at least a 200 megapixel Hasselblad H5D-200c to take portraits, sorry. Unless of course you already have one? If not, your images will be rubbish.
Great review! Most of my lenses would poop out first in real life shooting before I could get all 46 MP of resolution. Shooting birds far out in flight with a 600mm lens, the atmosphere and higher ISO kills off the higher pixels resolution first from my experience, thus making the crop factor advantage of the D850 null and void. I wish the they made a true replacement for the D700 with about 24mp optimizing the best ISO performance. I have a 54" wide printer and have shot billboards and never needed much more than 16MP's, since the comfortable angle of view causes larger prints to be viewed farther back anyway. I try to use the right lens to minimize cropping.
Thank you for the comparison review, I am a wedding photographer, I own the D750 and D850. I would like to say I pretty much agree with everything you said. My D750 is my main body for weddings, reason is high ISO performance, in my view you are looking at about 1/2 a stop of advantage, I would like to add that I shoot lossless compressed so the files I am getting are around 50MB per picture from the D850, shooting uncompressed doesn't give you are real advantage and really is pointless in my view. I agree for weddings the D750 is a better camera as I said mainly because the files you will get from it in the challenging lighting condition of a wedding will be cleaner, for everything else the D850 will be a better camera, for travel and private time I always take the D850. Both amazing cameras but my heart is always more with my D750, we have history together, over 3 years of fighting so I must admit I have a soft sport to it, it really is an amazing camera and I think amazing value for money.
Eshel Art Photography if Nikon D750 could have made like d500 it would be game changer in wedding photography. its easily superb in picture quality but lack little in built quality.
Eshel Art Photography thanks for sharing! I love my D750, it truly is an amazing camera. For weddings, the D850 will be set to shoot M raw. It works really well for me!
Eshel Art Photography i recently got a d810, today actually. I was thinking of getting a 2nd body for events/ weddings. Would you recommend d750? The prices have really started to drop. The only thing that concerns me with d750 is that there have been recalls on this camera. id most likely buy this 2nd hand, as i can get a really good deal. Let me know your thoughts, as you are someone with a lot of experience with the d750. Thx.
I am going to assume you are a wedding photographer, the D750 in my view is suited better for weddings because of its better low light performance and smaller files. Personally I wouldn't have a problem buying another D750 but at the end of the day this is your choice. One thing to remember is button layout, D750 and D810 buttons are different and when you need to make changes on a moment notice it can be a bit confusing, having 2 cameras with same button layout is important.
Eshel Art Photography awesome. I do events and started with weddings recently. Use to have the d7200. Thank you for your advice i will consider the d750
Just replaced by old D700 for a D750. Miss the old larger viewfinder and the D700 shutter 'clack'. Images at the moment seem comparable, somewhat surprised, but very early days.
Thqnx buddy thqnk uh. Soooo much...i do have a 750... I own it before 2 weeks ....i was totally confused to buy 750 or 850 but i love the 750 coz first its price . It give soo much in this price range ...and its not so much differ from 850 just a few difference...and i love the camera most...nikon is just the best ...
I shoot weddings, conventions and events at hotels as well as big convention centers and High School Winter Color Guard in badly lighted gyms and Marching bands both low light action photography. I have the D850, D750, and D500. I originally decided to buy the D750 over the D810 because the low light shooting action was so superior and the best-rated DSLR on the market, rated higher than the D4. I then added the D500 which for frames per second handily beats the D750, but I think the image quality of the D750 full frame has the advantage over the D500 crop, but depending what I'm needing the D500 for High Continuous is awesome very difficult to outrun that buffer. Then came the D850, it was like the first child of the D750 and D810 parents. Has everything. I, personally, think that the higher resolution makes it better than the D750 for low light action photos, unlike your test using similar megapixels, using D850's full 45 vs D750's 24 made a difference for me. When High Continuous shooting is a secondary consideration I'm equipped with the D850 as my Primary w/70-200mm 2.8 and the D750 as my secondary w/24-70mm 2.8 (D500 when High Continuous is needed). I love them all and together they make a great photo gear team!
I really can't argue the logic of the conclusion. For weddings, the D750 would be a fine camera to use and at half the price of the D850. For my particular usage, landscape, wildlife (with the inherent cropping that occurs), low-light street photography and astrophotography, I'm very pleased with my D850. Nine fps /w/battery grip is a nice improvement for wildlife shots and for low-light and astrophotography, the the illuminated buttons on the D850 are an absolute godsend.People should understand that when using the D850 in medium or small .raw size, the D850 captures an image in full size resolution and in-camera down-sizes it to medium of small files. I haven't checked the time loss in shooting in medium or small .raw as I always shoot in large mode.
Excellent presentation and in my opinion made every effort to do a fair comparison and honestly answered your viewers question. I have a Nikon D750 and have found it adequate for my semi-pro work in the studio and out of the studio. At the same time, I think I would really like the new features of the D850 with the touch screen and other features.
If you don't shoot video all that often, you can change the video record button on the D750 (the one near the shutter release) to function as an ISO button. Less elegant than the D850, but definitely better than fumbling with a button on the back. Same works on the D7200.
Thank you for the great comparison. I use the 750 & have loved it for almost 2 yrs now. Have had many high end Nikon 35 mm film cameras since middle 1980's . Your video convinced me that my back up camera will be another 750 instead of the 850 which I was researching. Many reasons besides cost. Everyone has preferences just like buying automobiles. Thank you again for your excellent video.
a Camera is not only a sensor or processor, especially when you pay 2000$+. While d750 has great output, it was a faulty camera having three recalls and do not tell me crap that your d750 takes great pictures.
Haha it does take great pictures. I believe none of the recalls had ANYTHING to do with it's image quality output. It had to do with the mechanical things not working well. Many photographers love the D750, and it is a fantastic camera. Also the choice of many wedding photographers.
As a D750 owner, I will say it has its pro's and cons just like every other camera on the market. No camera is perfect and that is just how it will be for many many years to come. I will say I am still blown away by the ISO performance and overall image quality. I no longer shoot as much video but using the 750 for video is just plain frustrating and the autofocus sucks. Other than that I've been a happy owner of the 750, never experience any issues with recalls but I still sent it in on the most recent one and the entire shutter assembly was replaced. As a travel camera I love my Fujifilm XT-20, great image quality and very compact.
Want to know what the truth is?? Cameras are just tools. Great photographers will get great shots no matter what camera they use. Don't need all of the bells and whistles or so called camera experts to tell you what is good and what isn't. Everyone's shooting styles are different. There is no doubt that the d850 is a great camera in its own right. There will always be better cameras out there as far as focusing, settings and features. But if you are depending on a top of the line camera to make you a better photographer you will be greatly disappointed. I have used my D750 for sports...wildlife...portraits...weddings...night photography...macro and landscapes. I have gotten great photos from all .why??? Because I am a great photographer. Spend your money on a camera that fits with your budget...Spend your time learning everything about it. And invest money in quality lenses that fit your budget as well. Don't let these experts or top gear candy people tell you what is best to use. As a pro or hobbyist it will never matter what you use if you are not good enough to know what you are doing or the skills to be a great photographer.
So why did you buy a D750? Why didn't you get a D3300 instead? After all, you're a great photographer and would have been able to get great photos with a D3300, and it would have saved you a lot of money for lenses. Surely you didn't buy the D750 instead, because it was a better camera that would do the job better than a D3300? Because that would just be silly. We all know that gear doesn't make any difference, it's all about the photographer.
I use two D750 bodies for weddings, but I still want a D850 body for other jobs, plus it would be nice to have the bigger files for the wedding formals.
I use 2 D750 bodies for weddings and portraits along with commercial work. I love them to death. but I am curious about the D850 with all the hype. I wouldn't upgrade just to say I have a flagship camera but I would if the cameras image quality was a lot better which from what I read and hear its not that much of a difference. I am curious enough to go and rent the d850 and put it on a road test then I will be sure. Because just reading peoples comments is not enough because most comments are very personalized and not a lot of experience in using these cameras and no one puts out pictures for side to side comparisons, funny thing is these youtubers are always looking for new content but they all talk about the same shit which is all about options. Options are good but image quality is more important for me and price to image quality as well. Paying twice the money for a camera that will not outperform the others image quality would be a waist of money and my clients would never know the difference. But if it is better quality then I wan to have it because I need to please myself before the client too lol :)
Why do you need a button for iso? There are 2 disks. In my setting front disk changes iso, rear disk controls apperture (in A mode) or shutter (in S mode). Thats it!!! Only in M mode (that I use in studio only) I need a button for iso control.
Great review and thanks for posting this. I mainly shoot landscape / wildlife and would you recommend D850 / D750. I have a D810 and wants to go for another body.
I got a d750 for 650 dollars like new condition. I’m really having buyers remorse as people have been telling me the d700 image quality is so much better then the 750
I love my 750 AND ....my clients do not recognize the difference between the nikon 7100 and 750 ... they also think if i put the battery grip that the camera is more professional :) sooo i bought the battery grip at 750, i also use the 7100 and 7500 at 7100 is 35 mm 1.8 at 7500 fisheye 8 mm 3.5 manula focus and 750 24-70 mm 2.8;) video I use canon 77d with 24mm 2.8 ronin s...
Hi Asif. The price of D750 is falling down. Now you can buy for 1500 and the lens 24x120 in 600 so you arrive on 2100. To get good images you do not need to buy a D850 to huge the files with 45 MP
Does the D850 not also have 'backlit' buttons? Some may not find this as a need, but I've taken photo's at night with my D750, where I have to carry a flashlight for button illumination to make changes to menu selections etc. I'd find this change to be very beneficial personally, albeit, not for twice the price or more.
That may be true but the D750 is just such a great value for the money. if you know what you are doing, the D750 will get you there 98 percent of the time. D500 for sports. I would actually use the d750 over the d500 for wildlife and work on getting closer to the animals. Thats the key. learning how to do that.
Absolutely right, the D750 is about 2/3 of a stop better than the D500 and the D500 is a tiny bit better than the D850, so yes, the D750 is better at high ISO than the D850.
@@GoneToHelenBach if you watch your pictures on a 45MP screen with the D850 and 24MP screen with the D750, ISO perfomance is better, but who does? On the same screen or print they are equal in ISO www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Nikon-D750-versus-Nikon-D500-versus-Nikon-D850___975_1061_1177. and for sharpness, with the same lens, the D750 is worst due to its AA filter.
Really an apples and oranges comparison. 4 years old vs a new release. $3300 vs $1800. Remember that the movie record button on the D750 can be programed as the ISO button making that a non-issue (still activates movie). Keep in mind many photographers are leaving DSLR for mirrorless primarily due to size and weight. D750 is the smallest and lightest full frame DSLR (old Canon 6D is close). Those on the fence with mirrorless may appreciate knowing that. A significant thing to point out is the D850’s wireless built-in radio flash transmitter for the SB5000…this is a significant pro feature that Nikon has lacked until the D500/D5/D850. This is why they ditched the pop-up flash. Canon has offered this for a long time and Nikon is just now catching up. Everyone is moving away from optical triggers due to line of sight restrictions.
Good points. Thanks for the tip about the D750 record button. I had thought I could do that but I was never able to find it in my custom buttons menus. I’ll look again! For me, the cameras age doesn’t matter much (many people still ya their film cameras, and for good reason). Also excellent point on the pop up flash as a trigger. It could definitely become a problem if and when it got in the way.
I owned a D750 and enjoyed the image quality. Ergonomics were decent, but similar to the D600, which is a bit small and dinky feeling. Have been using a D500 for over a year and find it perfect in every way, knowing that I'm not going to want it for wide angle work. Looking to acquire another full frame body this year and considering the D850 over the D810 largely because the ergonomics of the D850 are exactly the same as the D500.
DJ, I would highly recommend getting the D850. It's only around $400 more than the current D810 price, and you get more resolution, more features, and as you said the same ergonomics as the D500!
NO? second hand market 1500 for a D750 1700 for a D810 I think the best bargain right now is D810 it has dual SD card slots and has a pro body. My d750 is toasted and wrecked, it has mayor recall problems. I do not fully understand why ISO performance is better in the D750, as the Black lid illumination would indicate a stop better iso performance. Also Frames per second, is the reason you would whant the D850 + grip, this is really expencive! so I hope you do a 3 way review D850 versus D810 and D750 and aslo consider second hand D810 versus new D850 + grip.... rather recomend lenses + light and a D810.
De D500 has crushed whites, and yes if you got a hight pixel amount then the light per pixel is going to mathematicly be lower then for instance a D4S (16 mb) or a d750 (24 mb) so I am unsure what to believe, tu much "noise" in all the statments, but from what I understood de D850 still "holds up" because a camera is not only a sensor, it has noise reduction alchorithems that make it to the image, the D850 has a inhouse sensor made in Israel, en in theory, the new design sensor would push the ISO even further as for the 100th birtday camera release, they are swaying away from Sony sensors. Bottum line, D810 is in my opinion value wise way better then the D850, and unless your schooting wildlife as a pro and take on the extra costs of the battery charger ect ect you better send the cash on a holiday to see wildlife, light, again no magic dust can replace a ray of light! so a cheap reflector will make more difference then the d810/d850 debate.
I own both - 2 D850s' and a D750. The D850 is the most capable camera ever made. Dynamic range at ISO64 is the best of any FF camera. Autofocus, video, high ISO performance, headphone and mic plugs in the body, magnesium body, frame rate etc. Lenses? The Tamron 24-70 G2 out performs ( and outlasts) the Nikon. I have had three photographers work for me - all ditched the Nikon 24-70 and went for the Tamron - better flare control at night sports where we work ( Harness Racing ). I know heresy right? The depth of capability of the camera - video, time lapse, intervalometer, colour, file size, high ISO - I shoot at night 1/500 at f4 at 10,000ISO. Unimaginable a few years ago. Add in the lens range in F mount and in my 50 years of pro photography it has been the best choice I have made. Buy one now before Nikon decides to kill DSLRs'.
Good review. I use two D750's for weddings and its solid and have set the video record button on top for the iso control, so much easier than the one on the back.
Sorry to show my ignorance here but why would you have two of the same camera? It’s not the first time I’ve heard this so was curious to know what the reason would be.
so great video, it will help me make up my mind, but i do have one question what music track were you playing in the background of the iso comparison, really funky...
It makes sense for a smaller sensor to have better ISO performance. Pretty impressive ISO performance from the D850 considering the resolution. D750 ISO performance is pretty spectacular.
Absolutely! Considering the noise to megapixel ratio, it definitely makes sense. The D850 does indeed have great ISO performance, considering it is a high resolution camera. Also, the D850 has the BSI sensor which helps as well.
I'm revisiting your vide from two yearsago....and I still have my D750! P🙂🙂Price considerations of the 850 have me looking at the D780..any suggestions?
My D750 is coming tomorrow and I'm excited to get it. I'm currently using the D600 and I really like it. But I am ready to step up. The D850 is still currently out of my price range, even in the used market.
Hello sir, I appreciate your advice, I still have a question, is the noise at high ISO on the D850 the same on every file size (45 MPx, 24 MPX, etc)? In addition, I assume there is no cropping when reducing the raw file size right? Best regards.
I have an old D700 and need to upgrade to a D750 or D800. The problem I have is I have a Metz mecablitz flash gun I use with the D700. Can I use this on the newer Nikons. It's the 45 CL 4 digital handgun.
I miss the "easy iso" option I had on my D810. Changing the ISO by only turning the dial on the back was great. On my D850 I have to press that stupid iso button first :(
You can do that on the d850, too, when not on Manual. I'm sorry I can't remember where I saw it. Oh, I think I found it. Look at this video at 5 minutes in. Hope this helps! ruclips.net/video/OTTGI6ZEsZM/видео.html
Thanks Ben & Josh for nice comparison between both cameras.., I think the weight is really concern to carry all day pro cameras that's why people moving to mirrorless and fuji system. I glad I bought D750 and its great camera for everything. Thanks Again..Cheers !!
No word on the superior autofocus of the D850 which has 99 cross type sensors including on the left and right columns which makes composition through the frame easier and more reliable. Big battery improvement with D850... now at 1800 shots.
I now own both of these. I only recently purchased the D850 because the tether port on my D750 has started to fail and I desperately need this for my studio work. Looking at both, they are equally amazing in performance and I can not fault either. I only decided to go with the D850 this time due to the file sizes for me beauty work. If your budget leans more to a D750 purchase I can promise you, you won't be disappointed as from the untrained eye they are so very close in image quality. My biggest gripe is the XQD slot, those cards are crazy prices. Luckily, I tether most of my work so I bypass the SD and XQD and save directly to my Mac.
I liked your video but you left a few useful features the D850 has that the D750 does not have. For weddings it might not make a huge difference but focus stacking for detail shots is pretty nice. Focus peaking in live view is also nice. Getting 9fps with the grip is also an advantage if you do action shots. The reason you'd want a D850 for weddings vs the D750 would also be cropping ability and for very large prints. If you take the D850 images and scale them to the resolution of the D750 the ISO noise is drastically reduced and would make the images cleaner than native D750 files. With 6TB hard drives now only costing $150 on Amazon, file size should be the last thing to be thinking about and image quality should be first. Not to mention you can use a compressed 14bit lossless format on the D850 bringing the files down to around 50MB each with no loss in quality. If you are on a budget the D750 wins, that's about the only situation I can think of for getting it over the new D850. I could be biased as I own the D850.
You’ve got good points Andrew! I definitely agree that the D850 in most aspects is a better and more versatile camera, but for the price, the D750 is still a beast!
Thanks. It’s important to underscore the auto focus differences. Not only the. D850 is faster and more precise, but the viewfinder coverage is far better allowing for better composition . On the other hand, since Adobe software is famously inefficient you may end up buying a new computer.
Jaime EXCELLENT point! The viewfinder is awesome in this camera. About Adobe, I was really worried about this when I purchased the camera. Thankfully I’m updating my Mac this summer.
I have a D750 & a D500. First I bought a D500 and wow..the D500 is an amazing camera. After that I thought I need a fullframe but I love the D500 soo..I sold my old D7000 and couple of lenses what I really didnt use so much and bought a D750. I usually shots portraits, events and street photos. I figured out that the D750&D500 is an awesome combination. But than they released the D850..now sometimes I thinking sell the d500&d750 and get one D850. Is it make sense? I love the d500 body and build quality, the af system but the D750 beat it in image quality if it comes to portrait photos. What do you think? One part of my brain says that the D500&D750 is a stronger combo than just own one D850 and the other part think that the D850 is a ff system in a D500 body which is the dream camera..idk :/
Zangiel, I know the struggle for real! I went through similar "mind games" when deciding on the D850. My take on it is, why do you need a D850? Do you do more portrait work or landscape work? Also do you really need two cameras or only one? For me, it depended on the work I was doing. I primarily take portraits, but because I also do event photography, I saw it important for me to have two cameras (so I can use two different lenses and or have a backup). At the end of the day, I decided I would swallow the bullet and purchase the D850 but I went ahead an kept the D750 as my secondary/backup camera. If you don't do event photography where a second camera is crucial and you mostly do portraiture, landscapes, and other things, I would definitely consider buying the D850. It is by far the best DSLR on the market right now.
How about for abandoned buildings and graffiti? What would you suggest? I had the 750 and lived it. But lost it to the east river in NY. Gonna get a new camera. And am thinking is the 850 I big upgrafe?
Thank you for making this video it helped me a lot but I would just like to ask... which camera do you think would be better for " fashion photography " ? Im just looking for a full frame Nikon camera that will work with " fashion photography " and hoping that the Nikon D750 will do since its like half the price of the Nikon D850.
Buddy thEY are wedding photographs. Seriously you could shoot that shit with a cell phone. Back in the day they used to put disposable 35mm cameras on the tables at the reception. This is where the best images come from..Wedding photos LMAO. It is not a national Ad campaign...Weddings are HAPPY SNAPS!
1/8000 is the most important single reason I would stay away from the 750. I use the 1/8000 speed a lot here in Arizona, and a step down to 4000 just isn't feasible.
welcome to the sunshine state. I use 1/8000 and use ND at times to get shallow dof when I don't have a skrim handy as well as bringing the ambient down to use strobes during the day.
Xqd also provides Faster write speeds, higher capacities and will be evolving into cf express which will be backwards compatible with the D850. Xqd is about on par with uhs II i. Terms of price yet it is 100mb/s faster.
I have both cameras, my d750 just collects dust now but it served its purpose before the D850. You truly do get what you pay for in regards of photography. I just need better glass now.
Great video! Would the 750 be OK for birding? Why do neither of these cameras offer IS? Is a tripod necessary to avoid focus issues? Can you recommend one good all purpose lens for birding? Thank you!!
Hey mark! Yeah the D750 would be fine for that unless you need more fps, then you may want to consider something like a D500... anyway, I hear the Nikon 200-500 would be a great lenses for wildlife, birding, etc. The reason the bodies don’t have IS is because most of Nikon’s lens have IS (VR) in them. However, Nikon is releasing a new FF Mirrorless camera that has IS (VR) in the body. A tripod is not necessary, but it will certainly help you keep things more stable and get sharper shots at longer focal lengths.
I have both the D500 & D750. For birds in flight the D500 is hands down my go to. 10 FPS and fast auto focus enables me to capture sharp photos with no problem, and I don’t use a tripod. The Nikon 200-500mm lens is a great partner to use on the D500. The D750 produces wonderful images as well, but is not nearly as responsive when it comes to BIF.
By the way....have you heard of the internal oil/grease leaks and the recalls on the 750? And yes, I would choose the d750 because of the pop up flash....NOT....did I mention the recalls on the 750?
Ur reviews was indeed very much helpful. Co's i jst startd into wedding thing & i so wanted to get a camera not making a hole in my pocket n yeah gets the job done with exceptional photo quality... Big shout out mate... 👍👍👍
I really enjoyed the video, I'm still learning DSLR and I shoot primarily military aviation photography. Fast moving planes, low light conditions, 500mm lens due to the distance of the planes. I use a d7100 now but want to upgrade to the 750/850. What would you recommend?
I personally would get the D850 and get the battery grip so you can get the 9 FPS. Also if you don’t need the full resolution just use medium raw! :) if you’re interested in purchasing the D850 please consider using the link in the description, it helps my channel!
Nice comparison video. I have one doubt. Does D850 has built in auto focus motor? Is D850 support AF-D lenses?. I know D750 will support AF-D lens. Please clarify this. Thank you.
Thanks for the comparison. I got a question though .. How come that small porcelain figure at the end of a video has the completely different tone to it? The Nikon D750 seems to render the images with quite ugly yellow tone .. Was the lighting different, or it's just the camera sensor?
Belingle yes. How can I set it to do a video continuesly. Because what happen is; I was capturing live music video and I'm still going to use this camera for Wedding video, but through that experience I can't do wedding because it just stop recoding after 10min. Every 10min I must press recod.
I’ve never personally run into this issue on my D750. I have the capability to go continuously in 30min segments. If you have a manual, I would definitely look in the video section to make sure that certain settings didn’t get changed...
I'm doing journalism photography, like Politics, emergency services when there is a fire of accident, and military aviation.. Which one would you recommend? I have 18-105mm nikkor lens and a 200-500mm nikkor lens
The D800 series of cameras are built better and will hold up better. No question in my mind that I prefer the D850. The layout of the controls is better on the D850 too
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
my philosophy to photography is, get the best gear you can afford if it's your hobby; get only moderately adequate gear if it's your job.
let's not kid ourselves. 99.99% of your clients won't notice the difference between a tamron 24-70 and a nikkor 24-70. the only reason you want to upgrade to the latter is that you have a pair of trained eyes and have noticed the tiny difference, not because clients feedbacks have forced you to. same goes to camera bodies.
in another word, the fastest way to turn profit in the photography business is to not over estimate your client's expectations. do that, and you'll have a much more reasonable spending habit on your business. upgrade your kills before upgrading your gear.
You nailed the point! Great comment!
As a real estate photographer I bought the 14-24 Nikon twice (broke once) because I saw the difference between the chromatic aberration and the "removable" barrel distortion. And I have a look on agencies working with other photographers who use goPro or just some really awful technique, also the photos are oversaturated and so on, and so on.
I want the cheapest gear which does the job as well. I almost never deliver photos over 3200x2135 resolution. I know how it is when you brake 3000€ with a bad movement. I would rather have 2 pieces of D750 in my bag than a D850.
I bought my D750 when it was new. I have just noticed that it became right just now around 70k expos. It gains almost no dust anymore. I decided to buy another one if no D760 comes out this year. but surely would buy rather a used one with 20k shots than a new.
I couldn't agree more with your statement!
What to do. If it is both hobby and job
Agreed, I've had the record button to change ISO since shortly after the D750 came out, and I've been very happy with the quick results.
If its your job you get the most reliable gear, and that is what most pro photographers do because they are not stupid
I find it both amazing and amusing how obsessed young photographers are with new 📷 bodies; changing them like socks. Wiser and experienced photographers long ago realized investing in good glass along with focusing on composition and in camera knowledge with a familiar camera body, pay off in higher dividends.. than those wasting time and money constantly jumping to the newest body. Never ceases to amaze me when 3 generation old body users make the cover, while new camera photographers place 3rd. Sadly a explanation for this phenomena often falls on deaf ears.
James, maybe you are not aware, but digital cameras are very different from film cameras. A film photographer could invest in a single camera and stick with it for much of his career and never have to upgrade, whereas the same cannot be said for digital photographers who want to remain competitive. With resolutions ever increasing and camera sensors ever evolving, these days the camera you use actually matters more than it used to. In the past, the film you chose was more often than not vastly more important than the camera it was inside. Times have changed and if you think you're being "wise" to stick with a first or second generation DSLR, then the only thing I can say is that you are ignorant and stubborn, and young photographers would be better served listening to someone who actually understands what is going on in the world of photography.
Also, James, "phenomena" is the plural form of "phenomenon". The two are not interchangeable. For some reason, people think they sound smarter when they say "phenomena" instead of "phenomenon" without realizing that they are using it wrong. But you're so wise and experienced, so...
@@kwisclubta7175 You sound just like a spoiled little brat.
@@kwisclubta7175 Maybe you are not aware, being so young and arrogant, but the occurrence noted by James R is well known and has been documented by writers for decades, now. Pro photogs routinely stick to older cameras that are working for them. D3s and D4s are still in use and earning money for pros who understand this "phenomenon". It's the ignorant children of photography who think only the very latest gear will keep you working.
Also, note that James has 10 times the number of likes that your comment has.
@@TechSavvy. Gear is never as important as experience and knowledge.
The capabilities needed by today’s working professionals are ever growing and changing. The canon 5D mkiii for instance was and still is a fantastic photography tool. However, many photographers are also videographers. The 1080p of the 5Dmkiii just doesn’t cut it anymore. People that do not upgrade to the better 4k capable cameras, lose work. This has nothing to do with ability or knowledge. TV, computer screens and even phone screens are so advanced now that customers are demanding the best quality videos. Even as far as photography is concerned, having a modern camera with ultra lowlight capability, low light af and eye autofocus means that the photogs can get many more keepers in a modern wedding which is more and more often held in the afternoon and into the evening. Whereas in the past, weddings were usually held during the daytime.
I am in both camps. I shoot a new canon r5 for video but shoot an ancient Pentax 67 and a 4x5 film cameras for portraits. There is a place for everything and a reason to change gear as often as someone wants. Cheers
the d750 is nikons best DSLR. The D850 is great on a tripod. So is the D750 but the D750 is great in the hand with lots of different lenses and still amazing images that can be used for fairly large photographs that most normal people would display. Th D750 has the best sensor processor combo on any nikon camera.
The D850 is great on a tripod? Most cameras are. i have a d850 and i have used a 750- the 750 is the same 24mp of the 600,610.. its quicker, not much quicker.
The D850 is a different beast, if you start using its creative tools ... then there isn't much competition.
@@kb8729
Reading comprehension
I own a D750 and love it, but there is no reason to ever purchase a D750 over a D850 unless price is a concern. The D850 is on another level by comparison. I also own a D500 as well and if you are purchasing a D850 or D500, you are a person that doesn't use a pop-up flash and have a separate flash already. You are right about the D750 ISO performance, but from my research the D850 ISO performance is still better. D850 has better autofocus, focus peaking and stacking, 7-9frames a second (9 with battery Grip) touch screen display, even in the menu, rugged magnesium body, XQD, better buffer, ISO as low as 64, 4k video,need I go on. This is a studio/landscaper's dream camera A better comparison, would have been with the D5, maybe, but you are right the D750 is a great camera, just not in the same league.
From personal experience with my D850, the ISO performance is great, but I wouldn’t say it is fantastic. The D750 grain structure, to my eye is a much more consistent and tighter structure. I personally could care less about a pop up flash because I never use them, however I do know some people use them as controllers for other wireless flash units. Autofocus is as always, excellent. There really is no debate about that. Focus peaking is excellent, but mostly useless to most photographers, unless you’re using live view. You’re right about build quality and of course the cards will be much faster. Good thoughts!
Only thing D5 has is a dedicated CPU for AF , which is why it retails for 8k in Aus at least
When I purchased a second body for wedding jobs, I decided to buy a second D750 over a D850 because I didn’t want to think about the different button placement when I switched camera bodies throughout the day. I agree with the video, the D750 is an excellent wedding camera, and it is nice to have two. I do however want a D850 for the wedding formals, but that’s the only time I would switch to that body during the wedding.
sid vicious is the d500 better than the d750?
@@five18audio If you mainly shoot fast action or wildlife, then yes, for everything else, then no. Own both.
you can assign the record button to change you ISO on d750 best placement ever :)
Yes you can!!! I actually didn't know that until after posting this video haha!
You can do it on the d810 and d4s as well
Yes !! It's amazing !!
ruclips.net/video/7huPbJKVucM/видео.html
You can just assign the back wheel for ISO, the easiest option IMO
I changed the record button to the ISO button, meaning I can change the ISO with 1 hand. Great video.
they are both great cameras but for the money, the d750 is just an insane value. The best Nikon ever.
One thing not mentioned, with regard to the D850 having an ISO button, I personally rarely take 'video' so my red video button, next to the shutter, is set up just as the D850's ISO button! Simple, very effective.
D750 to this day still outperforms almost all full-frame cameras (except for D5, D4s, 1DXII) in high ISO performance.
XuQi it absolutely does!
The D750 is wonderful in high iso but compared to the d850 the d850 has cleaner high iso files
from what I so on video, no. Even if it is, the difference is very small.
interesting as find it the other way around. the d750 output actually looks like a canon which is much better than the usual Nikon sunglasses look
Most independent reviews disagree. The D850 is cleaner than the D750, and virtually all mirrorless full frames are better still.
It’s very simple to make the RED record button on the D750 the ISO button - extremely simple and that negates the point about the ISO button on the D850 being in a better spot. They are virtually the same when you do this.
Hey Brian! It’s actually a funny story about that. I had no idea that I could do that until someone commented on this video and told me 😂😂. I know now though! Thanks for the tip!
Brian Pex I was about to make the same comment but you beat me to it. I have the REC button assigned to my ISO.
You can just assign the rear wheel for ISO, best option IMO
You can program the record video button on the D750 to function as the ISO button like on the D850. Makes it easy.
For most of my needs, the D750 is perfect. I love the IQ from it, and the fact that it is WAAAAAY cheaper than the D850 is a big plus. I mean, I could get the Tamron 15-30 2.8 and 24-70 2.8 plus the D750 for same price as the D850 body only... so it makes more sense for me
You can now get 2 D750's, a backup, for a little less than the price of a D850. For all day wedding shoots, the lighter camera is the way to go.
A very helpful comparison indeed, nice work!
I find that I can apply more noise reduction on the D850 whilst maintaining detail with the higher resolution. The lack of an AA filter also allows me to ramp up the noise reduction. The processed images look very clean, and allow for a lot more post processing headroom. The D750 is very good, but after processing the D850 files look better. I noticed that my D500 files are also way better than my old 6D full frame - again sharper detail due to a lack of AA filter allows for greater headroom when applying noise reduction. You shouldn't consider ISO performance on it's own, other elements go towards producing cleaner images post processed.
my default is ti keep the iso as low as possible
I'm happy with my D750
I think I'll be getting it too for my first full frame is it still worth it?
Make it simple, the D750 is still a good choice for high iso performance. But when it come to wildlife or landscape, you will need D500 or D800/810.
Or just buy D850 you will cover all type of photography, plus a ton of new technologies in it
For wildlife, for me, it would be between the D500, D5, and D850 with battery grip.
I wouldn't count the D500 out in the high ISO area. I've shot at 6400 ISO on mine with excellent results at football and basketball games. Even tested it at ISO 51,200 with usable results:
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10208075885014617&l=194499f956
"But when it come to wildlife or landscape, you will need D500 or D800/810"
I have to love this train of thought, it's so quaint and endearing, indicative of the tech consumer bubble. What you are basically saying, to me here, is that examples of landscape photography before these cameras existed are all junk. You don't *need* anything like the features on such cameras to take great landscapes and wildlife photos.
I wonder how many people who desire these DSLRS actually print large format or whether they just pixel peep on a lap top or upload compressed to Flickr or Instagram.
I get the impression most think the camera is going to do the entire job for them. It makes their work lazy. They incessantly fuck around with the images in Lightroom anyway. I remember asking someone if they' used particular filter on an image being displayed and they acknowledged they had, no problem there, but she said she'd wanted the image to have a dusk kind of light when she'd actually taken the image say mid afternoon. In my head I'm thinking why didn't you just go out at dusk?
and for portrait?
You need at least a 200 megapixel Hasselblad H5D-200c to take portraits, sorry. Unless of course you already have one? If not, your images will be rubbish.
Great review! Most of my lenses would poop out first in real life shooting before I could get all 46 MP of resolution. Shooting birds far out in flight with a 600mm lens, the atmosphere and higher ISO kills off the higher pixels resolution first from my experience, thus making the crop factor advantage of the D850 null and void. I wish the they made a true replacement for the D700 with about 24mp optimizing the best ISO performance. I have a 54" wide printer and have shot billboards and never needed much more than 16MP's, since the comfortable angle of view causes larger prints to be viewed farther back anyway. I try to use the right lens to minimize cropping.
Thank you for the comparison review, I am a wedding photographer, I own the D750 and D850. I would like to say I pretty much agree with everything you said. My D750 is my main body for weddings, reason is high ISO performance, in my view you are looking at about 1/2 a stop of advantage, I would like to add that I shoot lossless compressed so the files I am getting are around 50MB per picture from the D850, shooting uncompressed doesn't give you are real advantage and really is pointless in my view. I agree for weddings the D750 is a better camera as I said mainly because the files you will get from it in the challenging lighting condition of a wedding will be cleaner, for everything else the D850 will be a better camera, for travel and private time I always take the D850. Both amazing cameras but my heart is always more with my D750, we have history together, over 3 years of fighting so I must admit I have a soft sport to it, it really is an amazing camera and I think amazing value for money.
Eshel Art Photography if Nikon D750 could have made like d500 it would be game changer in wedding photography. its easily superb in picture quality but lack little in built quality.
Eshel Art Photography thanks for sharing! I love my D750, it truly is an amazing camera. For weddings, the D850 will be set to shoot M raw. It works really well for me!
Eshel Art Photography i recently got a d810, today actually. I was thinking of getting a 2nd body for events/ weddings. Would you recommend d750? The prices have really started to drop.
The only thing that concerns me with d750 is that there have been recalls on this camera. id most likely buy this 2nd hand, as i can get a really good deal.
Let me know your thoughts, as you are someone with a lot of experience with the d750. Thx.
I am going to assume you are a wedding photographer, the D750 in my view is suited better for weddings because of its better low light performance and smaller files. Personally I wouldn't have a problem buying another D750 but at the end of the day this is your choice. One thing to remember is button layout, D750 and D810 buttons are different and when you need to make changes on a moment notice it can be a bit confusing, having 2 cameras with same button layout is important.
Eshel Art Photography awesome. I do events and started with weddings recently. Use to have the d7200. Thank you for your advice i will consider the d750
Great video! Doing an 8+ hour wedding, a lighter body like the D750 is a big help.
Great video!! Very comprehensive and educational! I like the idea that it was not biased!
Thanks LaGaspa Im glad you enjoyed the video! You can subscribe for more videos like this one! :)
Tamron is also coming out with and F4 version also in a few months for about$799.
Just replaced by old D700 for a D750. Miss the old larger viewfinder and the D700 shutter 'clack'.
Images at the moment seem comparable, somewhat surprised, but very early days.
Thqnx buddy thqnk uh. Soooo much...i do have a 750...
I own it before 2 weeks ....i was totally confused to buy 750 or 850 but i love the 750 coz first its price .
It give soo much in this price range ...and its not so much differ from 850 just a few difference...and i love the camera most...nikon is just the best ...
Still working the d3 and d700 - still doing the job 110 percent........
Victor McAuley files from D700 are awesome.
I love my D700, but I am still looking for an upgrade.
I have D700 and D750 for weddings. And the tones from D750 are way better for me. Probably I will sell D700 and I will buy one more D750.
Victor McAuley I shoot sports events with a D3S and D700. They're fast, accurate, and handle well. If it ain't broke don't fix it.
Dear Victor, have you ever had a card-fail? ... That's my single fear about D700
I shoot weddings, conventions and events at hotels as well as big convention centers and High School Winter Color Guard in badly lighted gyms and Marching bands both low light action photography. I have the D850, D750, and D500. I originally decided to buy the D750 over the D810 because the low light shooting action was so superior and the best-rated DSLR on the market, rated higher than the D4. I then added the D500 which for frames per second handily beats the D750, but I think the image quality of the D750 full frame has the advantage over the D500 crop, but depending what I'm needing the D500 for High Continuous is awesome very difficult to outrun that buffer. Then came the D850, it was like the first child of the D750 and D810 parents. Has everything. I, personally, think that the higher resolution makes it better than the D750 for low light action photos, unlike your test using similar megapixels, using D850's full 45 vs D750's 24 made a difference for me. When High Continuous shooting is a secondary consideration I'm equipped with the D850 as my Primary w/70-200mm 2.8 and the D750 as my secondary w/24-70mm 2.8 (D500 when High Continuous is needed). I love them all and together they make a great photo gear team!
I mostly shot at M raw because the viewer in a different comment requested we show medium raw.
I really can't argue the logic of the conclusion. For weddings, the D750 would be a fine camera to use and at half the price of the D850. For my particular usage, landscape, wildlife (with the inherent cropping that occurs), low-light street photography and astrophotography, I'm very pleased with my D850. Nine fps /w/battery grip is a nice improvement for wildlife shots and for low-light and astrophotography, the the illuminated buttons on the D850 are an absolute godsend.People should understand that when using the D850 in medium or small .raw size, the D850 captures an image in full size resolution and in-camera down-sizes it to medium of small files. I haven't checked the time loss in shooting in medium or small .raw as I always shoot in large mode.
Excellent presentation and in my opinion made every effort to do a fair comparison and honestly answered your viewers question. I have a Nikon D750 and have found it adequate for my semi-pro work in the studio and out of the studio. At the same time, I think I would really like the new features of the D850 with the touch screen and other features.
Yes! As I said in the video, I didn’t know I needed a touch screen until I got my D850!
If you don't shoot video all that often, you can change the video record button on the D750 (the one near the shutter release) to function as an ISO button. Less elegant than the D850, but definitely better than fumbling with a button on the back. Same works on the D7200.
You can just assign the rear wheel to control ISO. IMO it's the best option compared to other workarounds.
Thank you for the great comparison. I use the 750 & have loved it for almost 2 yrs now. Have had many high end Nikon 35 mm film cameras since middle 1980's . Your video convinced me that my back up camera will be another 750 instead of the 850 which I was researching. Many reasons besides cost. Everyone has preferences just like buying automobiles. Thank you again for your excellent video.
Finally... thank you so much. I’m keeping my D750.
Just assign the d750 rec button to iso. It's what I use. Also, it has easy iso which, in A or S mode, gives iso adjustment to the front or back wheels
The best review for these two cameras; allows me to make an informed decision
a Camera is not only a sensor or processor, especially when you pay 2000$+. While d750 has great output, it was a faulty camera having three recalls and do not tell me crap that your d750 takes great pictures.
Haha it does take great pictures. I believe none of the recalls had ANYTHING to do with it's image quality output. It had to do with the mechanical things not working well. Many photographers love the D750, and it is a fantastic camera. Also the choice of many wedding photographers.
@@Belingle I love it too, but would not buy it unless I find great deal on it. I'd rather go for d800.
As a D750 owner, I will say it has its pro's and cons just like every other camera on the market. No camera is perfect and that is just how it will be for many many years to come. I will say I am still blown away by the ISO performance and overall image quality. I no longer shoot as much video but using the 750 for video is just plain frustrating and the autofocus sucks. Other than that I've been a happy owner of the 750, never experience any issues with recalls but I still sent it in on the most recent one and the entire shutter assembly was replaced. As a travel camera I love my Fujifilm XT-20, great image quality and very compact.
The only thing i miss in Nikon d750 is little joystick or thumbstick to change focus points. Other than that its still a great value.
Want to know what the truth is?? Cameras are just tools. Great photographers will get great shots no matter what camera they use. Don't need all of the bells and whistles or so called camera experts to tell you what is good and what isn't. Everyone's shooting styles are different. There is no doubt that the d850 is a great camera in its own right. There will always be better cameras out there as far as focusing, settings and features. But if you are depending on a top of the line camera to make you a better photographer you will be greatly disappointed. I have used my D750 for sports...wildlife...portraits...weddings...night photography...macro and landscapes. I have gotten great photos from all .why??? Because I am a great photographer. Spend your money on a camera that fits with your budget...Spend your time learning everything about it. And invest money in quality lenses that fit your budget as well. Don't let these experts or top gear candy people tell you what is best to use. As a pro or hobbyist it will never matter what you use if you are not good enough to know what you are doing or the skills to be a great photographer.
So... you would able to get even better photos with D850. No such excuses for not having it.
Of course you're a great photographer. After all, you're a RUclips commenter.
So why did you buy a D750? Why didn't you get a D3300 instead? After all, you're a great photographer and would have been able to get great photos with a D3300, and it would have saved you a lot of money for lenses. Surely you didn't buy the D750 instead, because it was a better camera that would do the job better than a D3300? Because that would just be silly. We all know that gear doesn't make any difference, it's all about the photographer.
Thanks again for the advice and tips on shooting with the Nikon D750 & shooting Nikon 850
Jewel, thanks for watching! We’re glad you enjoyed the video!
I use two D750 bodies for weddings, but I still want a D850 body for other jobs, plus it would be nice to have the bigger files for the wedding formals.
I use 2 D750 bodies for weddings and portraits along with commercial work. I love them to death. but I am curious about the D850 with all the hype. I wouldn't upgrade just to say I have a flagship camera but I would if the cameras image quality was a lot better which from what I read and hear its not that much of a difference. I am curious enough to go and rent the d850 and put it on a road test then I will be sure. Because just reading peoples comments is not enough because most comments are very personalized and not a lot of experience in using these cameras and no one puts out pictures for side to side comparisons, funny thing is these youtubers are always looking for new content but they all talk about the same shit which is all about options. Options are good but image quality is more important for me and price to image quality as well. Paying twice the money for a camera that will not outperform the others image quality would be a waist of money and my clients would never know the difference. But if it is better quality then I wan to have it because I need to please myself before the client too lol :)
FYI- on the D750 you can program the movie record button to iso. The button is on top next to the shutter button.
Why do you need a button for iso? There are 2 disks. In my setting front disk changes iso, rear disk controls apperture (in A mode) or shutter (in S mode). Thats it!!! Only in M mode (that I use in studio only) I need a button for iso control.
For those worrying about the ISO button placement comments I made in the video, I now am aware you can reassign the video record button to ISO.
Belingle such a worry. lol
IKR lol
that's what i was going to say! I did it
I had no idea!!! Changed it the second I read this
lol just turn on "Easy ISO" and adjust the ISO on the back-command dial
Thank you , pal for good comments on both cameras
Great review and thanks for posting this. I mainly shoot landscape / wildlife and would you recommend D850 / D750. I have a D810 and wants to go for another body.
Definitely the D850. Faster AF and more detail!
nikon d750 is much clearer images are more beautiful
I love the image quality on my D750!
The photographer makes the images beautiful not the camera. :-)
you are correct!
I got a d750 for 650 dollars like new condition. I’m really having buyers remorse as people have been telling me the d700 image quality is so much better then the 750
I love my 750 AND ....my clients do not recognize the difference between the nikon 7100 and 750 ... they also think if i put the battery grip that the camera is more professional :) sooo i bought the battery grip at 750, i also use the 7100 and 7500 at 7100 is 35 mm 1.8 at 7500 fisheye 8 mm 3.5 manula focus and 750 24-70 mm 2.8;) video I use canon 77d with 24mm 2.8 ronin s...
EXCELLENT EXPLANATION I WILL KEEP MY D750 !!!!
Hi Asif. The price of D750 is falling down. Now you can buy for 1500 and the lens 24x120 in 600 so you arrive on 2100. To get good images you do not need to buy a D850 to huge the files with 45 MP
Once you get FX full frame you will never come back to DX .
@@MegaTrelleborg The D500 may give you better images than a FX body for sports shooting due to cropping.
I do mostly landscape photography and currently own a D750, hoping to upgrade to a D850.
Great Quincy! The D850 is a wonderful camera with lots of goodies!
Does the D850 not also have 'backlit' buttons? Some may not find this as a need, but I've taken photo's at night with my D750, where I have to carry a flashlight for button illumination to make changes to menu selections etc. I'd find this change to be very beneficial personally, albeit, not for twice the price or more.
It’s a non argument .d850 is miles apart is fast auto focus and everything
That’s true, but it may not be for everyone.
That may be true but the D750 is just such a great value for the money. if you know what you are doing, the D750 will get you there 98 percent of the time. D500 for sports. I would actually use the d750 over the d500 for wildlife and work on getting closer to the animals. Thats the key. learning how to do that.
On higher ISO i find the Nikon d750 sharper than d850 ! Did you notice?
It is due to the D750s slightly better ISO performance.
Absolutely right, the D750 is about 2/3 of a stop better than the D500 and the D500 is a tiny bit better than the D850, so yes, the D750 is better at high ISO than the D850.
@@GoneToHelenBach if you watch your pictures on a 45MP screen with the D850 and 24MP screen with the D750, ISO perfomance is better, but who does? On the same screen or print they are equal in ISO www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Nikon-D750-versus-Nikon-D500-versus-Nikon-D850___975_1061_1177. and for sharpness, with the same lens, the D750 is worst due to its AA filter.
05:09 You can re-program the rec button to ISO sensitivity on the D750. Not that big a deal.
Really an apples and oranges comparison. 4 years old vs a new release. $3300 vs $1800. Remember that the movie record button on the D750 can be programed as the ISO button making that a non-issue (still activates movie). Keep in mind many photographers are leaving DSLR for mirrorless primarily due to size and weight. D750 is the smallest and lightest full frame DSLR (old Canon 6D is close). Those on the fence with mirrorless may appreciate knowing that.
A significant thing to point out is the D850’s wireless built-in radio flash transmitter for the SB5000…this is a significant pro feature that Nikon has lacked until the D500/D5/D850. This is why they ditched the pop-up flash. Canon has offered this for a long time and Nikon is just now catching up. Everyone is moving away from optical triggers due to line of sight restrictions.
Good points. Thanks for the tip about the D750 record button. I had thought I could do that but I was never able to find it in my custom buttons menus. I’ll look again! For me, the cameras age doesn’t matter much (many people still ya their film cameras, and for good reason). Also excellent point on the pop up flash as a trigger. It could definitely become a problem if and when it got in the way.
Yep. And I got mine when on sale for $1499, new from nikon, that included a nikon battery grip and two nikon batteries...and bag.
Actually the 6D was the smallest full frame DSLR - not the D750. If you actually hold both and compare it becomes very obvious.
Thanks your right. Haven't used one.
Thank you for the excellent comparison. Answered very important questions.
I owned a D750 and enjoyed the image quality. Ergonomics were decent, but similar to the D600, which is a bit small and dinky feeling. Have been using a D500 for over a year and find it perfect in every way, knowing that I'm not going to want it for wide angle work. Looking to acquire another full frame body this year and considering the D850 over the D810 largely because the ergonomics of the D850 are exactly the same as the D500.
DJ, I would highly recommend getting the D850. It's only around $400 more than the current D810 price, and you get more resolution, more features, and as you said the same ergonomics as the D500!
Totally agree that the D500 responds much more like a professional camera than the D750.
NO? second hand market 1500 for a D750 1700 for a D810 I think the best bargain right now is D810 it has dual SD card slots and has a pro body. My d750 is toasted and wrecked, it has mayor recall problems. I do not fully understand why ISO performance is better in the D750, as the Black lid illumination would indicate a stop better iso performance. Also Frames per second, is the reason you would whant the D850 + grip, this is really expencive! so I hope you do a 3 way review D850 versus D810 and D750 and aslo consider second hand D810 versus new D850 + grip.... rather recomend lenses + light and a D810.
De D500 has crushed whites, and yes if you got a hight pixel amount then the light per pixel is going to mathematicly be lower then for instance a D4S (16 mb) or a d750 (24 mb) so I am unsure what to believe, tu much "noise" in all the statments, but from what I understood de D850 still "holds up" because a camera is not only a sensor, it has noise reduction alchorithems that make it to the image, the D850 has a inhouse sensor made in Israel, en in theory, the new design sensor would push the ISO even further as for the 100th birtday camera release, they are swaying away from Sony sensors.
Bottum line, D810 is in my opinion value wise way better then the D850, and unless your schooting wildlife as a pro and take on the extra costs of the battery charger ect ect you better send the cash on a holiday to see wildlife, light, again no magic dust can replace a ray of light! so a cheap reflector will make more difference then the d810/d850 debate.
I like the D750 over the D500 though
I own both - 2 D850s' and a D750. The D850 is the most capable camera ever made. Dynamic range at ISO64 is the best of any FF camera. Autofocus, video, high ISO performance, headphone and mic plugs in the body, magnesium body, frame rate etc. Lenses? The Tamron 24-70 G2 out performs ( and outlasts) the Nikon. I have had three photographers work for me - all ditched the Nikon 24-70 and went for the Tamron - better flare control at night sports where we work ( Harness Racing ). I know heresy right? The depth of capability of the camera - video, time lapse, intervalometer, colour, file size, high ISO - I shoot at night 1/500 at f4 at 10,000ISO. Unimaginable a few years ago. Add in the lens range in F mount and in my 50 years of pro photography it has been the best choice I have made. Buy one now before Nikon decides to kill DSLRs'.
Hi Ben just found u what a fantastic review subscribed ❤ from Australia
Good review. I use two D750's for weddings and its solid and have set the video record button on top for the iso control, so much easier than the one on the back.
That’s excellent James!
Sorry to show my ignorance here but why would you have two of the same camera? It’s not the first time I’ve heard this so was curious to know what the reason would be.
@@da_great_mogul Probably as a backup! You will want a failsafe for weddings :)
@@eva-qy7ne bloody hell, you got there in the end!
so great video, it will help me make up my mind, but i do have one question what music track were you playing in the background of the iso comparison, really funky...
I’m not sure. Sorry.
It makes sense for a smaller sensor to have better ISO performance. Pretty impressive ISO performance from the D850 considering the resolution. D750 ISO performance is pretty spectacular.
Absolutely! Considering the noise to megapixel ratio, it definitely makes sense. The D850 does indeed have great ISO performance, considering it is a high resolution camera. Also, the D850 has the BSI sensor which helps as well.
What about the D850's BSI chip and lit buttons on the back?
I'm revisiting your vide from two yearsago....and I still have my D750! P🙂🙂Price considerations of the 850 have me looking at the D780..any suggestions?
My D750 is coming tomorrow and I'm excited to get it. I'm currently using the D600 and I really like it. But I am ready to step up. The D850 is still currently out of my price range, even in the used market.
Hello sir, I appreciate your advice, I still have a question, is the noise at high ISO on the D850 the same on every file size (45 MPx, 24 MPX, etc)? In addition, I assume there is no cropping when reducing the raw file size right? Best regards.
I haven’t actually tested that but my assumption would be yes. And no, there should be no cropping when changing the resolution.
I have an old D700 and need to upgrade to a D750 or D800. The problem I have is I have a Metz mecablitz flash gun I use with the D700. Can I use this on the newer Nikons. It's the 45 CL 4 digital handgun.
I miss the "easy iso" option I had on my D810. Changing the ISO by only turning the dial on the back was great. On my D850 I have to press that stupid iso button first :(
You can do that on the d850, too, when not on Manual. I'm sorry I can't remember where I saw it. Oh, I think I found it. Look at this video at 5 minutes in. Hope this helps! ruclips.net/video/OTTGI6ZEsZM/видео.html
davinsie the d750 still has that I love that feature!!!
I got D5300 an excellent camera. Later on I got D750 FF astonishing. Both are perfect but the 5300 is highly sensible under low light shots
Thanks Ben & Josh for nice comparison between both cameras.., I think the weight is really concern to carry all day pro cameras that's why people moving to mirrorless and fuji system. I glad I bought D750 and its great camera for everything. Thanks Again..Cheers !!
We’re glad you liked the video Singh! Yes the D750 is STILL one of the best cameras on the market!!!
No word on the superior autofocus of the D850 which has 99 cross type sensors including on the left and right columns which makes composition through the frame easier and more reliable. Big battery improvement with D850... now at 1800 shots.
I now own both of these. I only recently purchased the D850 because the tether port on my D750 has started to fail and I desperately need this for my studio work. Looking at both, they are equally amazing in performance and I can not fault either. I only decided to go with the D850 this time due to the file sizes for me beauty work. If your budget leans more to a D750 purchase I can promise you, you won't be disappointed as from the untrained eye they are so very close in image quality. My biggest gripe is the XQD slot, those cards are crazy prices. Luckily, I tether most of my work so I bypass the SD and XQD and save directly to my Mac.
I liked your video but you left a few useful features the D850 has that the D750 does not have. For weddings it might not make a huge difference but focus stacking for detail shots is pretty nice. Focus peaking in live view is also nice. Getting 9fps with the grip is also an advantage if you do action shots. The reason you'd want a D850 for weddings vs the D750 would also be cropping ability and for very large prints. If you take the D850 images and scale them to the resolution of the D750 the ISO noise is drastically reduced and would make the images cleaner than native D750 files. With 6TB hard drives now only costing $150 on Amazon, file size should be the last thing to be thinking about and image quality should be first. Not to mention you can use a compressed 14bit lossless format on the D850 bringing the files down to around 50MB each with no loss in quality. If you are on a budget the D750 wins, that's about the only situation I can think of for getting it over the new D850. I could be biased as I own the D850.
You’ve got good points Andrew! I definitely agree that the D850 in most aspects is a better and more versatile camera, but for the price, the D750 is still a beast!
D750 has a shutter lag issue ! The rest ok. Period!
Thanks. It’s important to underscore the auto focus differences. Not only the. D850 is faster and more precise, but the viewfinder coverage is far better allowing for better composition . On the other hand, since Adobe software is famously inefficient you may end up buying a new computer.
Jaime EXCELLENT point! The viewfinder is awesome in this camera. About Adobe, I was really worried about this when I purchased the camera. Thankfully I’m updating my Mac this summer.
Im thinking to buy now the 750..still great camera!😉
I have a D750 & a D500. First I bought a D500 and wow..the D500 is an amazing camera. After that I thought I need a fullframe but I love the D500 soo..I sold my old D7000 and couple of lenses what I really didnt use so much and bought a D750. I usually shots portraits, events and street photos.
I figured out that the D750&D500 is an awesome combination. But than they released the D850..now sometimes I thinking sell the d500&d750 and get one D850. Is it make sense? I love the d500 body and build quality, the af system but the D750 beat it in image quality if it comes to portrait photos. What do you think? One part of my brain says that the D500&D750 is a stronger combo than just own one D850 and the other part think that the D850 is a ff system in a D500 body which is the dream camera..idk :/
Zangiel, I know the struggle for real! I went through similar "mind games" when deciding on the D850. My take on it is, why do you need a D850? Do you do more portrait work or landscape work? Also do you really need two cameras or only one? For me, it depended on the work I was doing. I primarily take portraits, but because I also do event photography, I saw it important for me to have two cameras (so I can use two different lenses and or have a backup). At the end of the day, I decided I would swallow the bullet and purchase the D850 but I went ahead an kept the D750 as my secondary/backup camera. If you don't do event photography where a second camera is crucial and you mostly do portraiture, landscapes, and other things, I would definitely consider buying the D850. It is by far the best DSLR on the market right now.
How about for abandoned buildings and graffiti? What would you suggest? I had the 750 and lived it. But lost it to the east river in NY. Gonna get a new camera. And am thinking is the 850 I big upgrafe?
I want comparisons like this. Thank you very much . Superb
Glad you liked it Fechete!
Thank you for making this video it helped me a lot but I would just like to ask... which camera do you think would be better for " fashion photography " ? Im just looking for a full frame Nikon camera that will work with " fashion photography " and hoping that the Nikon D750 will do since its like half the price of the Nikon D850.
Either or would be fine! But having the extra MP, especially in the studio, makes for great portraits!
great video thanks. I own the D750 Love it , going to buy the D850
Thanks Colt! You won’t be disappointed!
hmm is the 45 mp not just better? also to make big prints, so you can sell more photos ?
I Use 2 750 for wedding and 810 for studio. 750 is great on events like you said for low light and weight all day. 810 in the bag at the weddings
I agree!
Buddy thEY are wedding photographs. Seriously you could shoot that shit with a cell phone. Back in the day they used to put disposable 35mm cameras on the tables at the reception. This is where the best images come from..Wedding photos LMAO. It is not a national Ad campaign...Weddings are HAPPY SNAPS!
1/8000 is the most important single reason I would stay away from the 750. I use the 1/8000 speed a lot here in Arizona, and a step down to 4000 just isn't feasible.
I personally have never had to go that fast on my shutter speed but you make a good point! I currently am in Arizona!
welcome to the sunshine state. I use 1/8000 and use ND at times to get shallow dof when I don't have a skrim handy as well as bringing the ambient down to use strobes during the day.
Do you use strobes at 8,000?
Excellent! Very good analysis. Thank you!
Thank you for the video. ISO on D750 is simply better. Thank u
Xqd also provides Faster write speeds, higher capacities and will be evolving into cf express which will be backwards compatible with the D850. Xqd is about on par with uhs II i. Terms of price yet it is 100mb/s faster.
I have both cameras, my d750 just collects dust now but it served its purpose before the D850. You truly do get what you pay for in regards of photography. I just need better glass now.
Just think what glass you could have had to put on tbe D750 instead of buying another body. Lol
Great video! Would the 750 be OK for birding? Why do neither of these cameras offer IS? Is a tripod necessary to avoid focus issues? Can you recommend one good all purpose lens for birding?
Thank you!!
Hey mark! Yeah the D750 would be fine for that unless you need more fps, then you may want to consider something like a D500... anyway, I hear the Nikon 200-500 would be a great lenses for wildlife, birding, etc. The reason the bodies don’t have IS is because most of Nikon’s lens have IS (VR) in them. However, Nikon is releasing a new FF Mirrorless camera that has IS (VR) in the body. A tripod is not necessary, but it will certainly help you keep things more stable and get sharper shots at longer focal lengths.
Can't thank you enough!
I have both the D500 & D750. For birds in flight the D500 is hands down my go to. 10 FPS and fast auto focus enables me to capture sharp photos with no problem, and I don’t use a tripod. The Nikon 200-500mm lens is a great partner to use on the D500. The D750 produces wonderful images as well, but is not nearly as responsive when it comes to BIF.
Thanks for d precise comparison. I own a d750 n am satisfied with it. 👍
It’s an excellent camera!
By the way....have you heard of the internal oil/grease leaks and the recalls on the 750? And yes, I would choose the d750 because of the pop up flash....NOT....did I mention the recalls on the 750?
Yes, but that is no longer a problem.
Thank you... a great comparison that generated some great replies. Good work...
hi ben,
u can also configure iso in video button in d750 which will make you to change the iso as you see in d850
That’s right! Thanks Bala!!
Ur reviews was indeed very much helpful. Co's i jst startd into wedding thing & i so wanted to get a camera not making a hole in my pocket n yeah gets the job done with exceptional photo quality... Big shout out mate... 👍👍👍
Glad you liked it Joey!
I really enjoyed the video, I'm still learning DSLR and I shoot primarily military aviation photography. Fast moving planes, low light conditions, 500mm lens due to the distance of the planes. I use a d7100 now but want to upgrade to the 750/850. What would you recommend?
I personally would get the D850 and get the battery grip so you can get the 9 FPS. Also if you don’t need the full resolution just use medium raw! :) if you’re interested in purchasing the D850 please consider using the link in the description, it helps my channel!
@@Belingle I ended up going with the D750 and the battery grip. It really is such a nice step up from my D7100 - thanks again for the video.
Used single digit like a d4s or a d5
Depends on your needs but if you plan on shooting aviation D500 no questions. Buy for your needs not just because something is “full frame”
@@filipinomerino96 not a bad idea. Or a z7 with a battery grip in dx crop
Nice comparison video. I have one doubt. Does D850 has built in auto focus motor? Is D850 support AF-D lenses?. I know D750 will support AF-D lens. Please clarify this.
Thank you.
Hi Ravi. Yes to all of these questions :)
@@Belingle Thanks for your valuable reply.
The D750 is just a camera.
But the D850 is a truly LEGENDARY camera - and that says a lot, because it is. No question of it.
Thanks for the comparison. I got a question though .. How come that small porcelain figure at the end of a video has the completely different tone to it? The Nikon D750 seems to render the images with quite ugly yellow tone .. Was the lighting different, or it's just the camera sensor?
Hi thank you for your Video.
I have a D750, I want to do videos but it always laps after 10min, is there any other thing that I can do to avoid that?
Adonai Visuals, by "laps" do you mean creates a new clip?
Belingle yes. How can I set it to do a video continuesly. Because what happen is; I was capturing live music video and I'm still going to use this camera for Wedding video, but through that experience I can't do wedding because it just stop recoding after 10min. Every 10min I must press recod.
I’ve never personally run into this issue on my D750. I have the capability to go continuously in 30min segments. If you have a manual, I would definitely look in the video section to make sure that certain settings didn’t get changed...
On my D700, the ISO button is on the left, but I still manage to alter the ISO. How is this possible?
I'm doing journalism photography, like Politics, emergency services when there is a fire of accident, and military aviation.. Which one would you recommend? I have 18-105mm nikkor lens and a 200-500mm nikkor lens
Most likely the D850 for the speed.
@@Belingle Thanks!
The D800 series of cameras are built better and will hold up better. No question in my mind that I prefer the D850. The layout of the controls is better on the D850 too
Agree totally on these points.