Objection Halts Defense Opening Statements in Anderson Trial
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 мар 2023
- During defense attorney Nicole Muller’s opening statement, she described to jurors how law enforcement failed to investigate any suspects, other than the defendant, including Anderson’s ex-girlfriend, Sadie Beacham. Prosecutors say Zachariah Anderson murdered his ex-girlfriend's new lover, Rosalio Gutierrez Jr. in May 2020.
MORE HERE: www.courttv.com/trending/obse...
#CourtTV #WIvAnderson
COURT TV IS BACK! 24/7 LIVE gavel-to-gavel coverage, in-depth legal reporting, and expert analysis of the nation’s most important and compelling trials.
WATCH COURT TV LIVE:
www.courttv.com/title/court-t...
WATCH TRIALS ON DEMAND:
www.courttv.com/programming/t...
WHERE TO WATCH:
www.courttv.com/where-to-watc...
MORE HERE: www.courttv.com/trending/obsessed-ex-boyfriend-murder-trial-wi-v-zachariah-anderson/?
Did she really say "misKellaneous"? 😳
She sure did🤣🤣🤣
I hate it when I misspeak! Have y'all ever done that?
Wisconsin has its own dictionary
I'm not sure if she's an inexperienced attorney or maybe very nervous but definitely not a great speaker. Maybe she will be more effective at questioning witnesses.
@@ruserious5598 not like that
Why do I feel like the defense attorney is in a high school debate class?
Couldn’t take her seriously for being an attorney lol
She’s seriously bad
Defense attorney's voice is like nails on a black board. I can't remember anything she says
Retire after this 😂 😂 😂
It’s like she thinks she is a female against males she has to turn up the attitude but I think it’s hard for the jury to take her seriously esp with all that head jarring and eyebrow dancing!
She needs to show concrete evidence that he was somewhere else and not where the Law enforcement says he was . If she can prove that she has something to stand on .
I WOULD like an explanation why there is zero video evidence of his car (or van) heading to or from Kenosha
Makes no sense to park far away so your tools won’t get stolen. Someone is less likely to break into your truck if your parked close to the store.
The defense attorney is horrible. She makes the defendant sound guilty, regardless of whether he is or not. She is not a litigator.
What they do have is circumstantial evidence🤔why would he be there?
This defense atty is delusional
This Judge is clearly not fit to preside over this case. Get a new Judge.
She has a very off putting way of communicating, she’s very condescending! The evidence is overwhelming..
I'm sorry. The evidence was overwhelming? What in God's good name is that evidence? DNA that may NOT be DNA. Cleaning wipes DURING COVID PANDEMIC NONETHELESS? Small trash bags? A cellmate who supposedly was told by Zach he admitted to the murder?
Here is the overwhelming evidence AGAINST: A daughter who lies constantly with telling her school for 2 months that she was dying of leukemia. Expert DNA witness who said that the DNA is only assumed to be Mr. Gutierrez's and could even be Arby sauce. Witness who was not allowed to be questioned in front of the jury who told him that that same cellmate Marquan of Zach's told him that sometimes you need to lie in a court to get a reduced sentence. The same corrupt office who charged Kyle Rittenhouse, when AMPLE evidence proved he acted in self-defense and their own witness during that trial told scolded them for trying to get him to change his testimony to further their agenda., mouthed the words "Die, Die, Die" at the EXACT same time as the former cellmate, suggesting a rehearsed and possibly fabricated story. A judge who was on his last case before retirement, who seemed to let evidence that was pro-defense not to be heard (same judge in Rittenhouse trial). I could go on, but that is more than enough.
There’s No body? There’s No weapon? There’s no witnesses? So how can they sentence someone without the main parts of evidence ? Any reasonable doubt???
Wheres the proof that he hide this corps?
Why didn't you get this Evidence that Law enforcement was wrong
Why doesn't the Google covid disclaimer show up on this video that talks about covid?
Did she just say ‘misKelaneous’???
She also said hands, FEETS, arms 🤣
@@tammhlowe3915 🤣🤣🤣
I just cant with this defense attorney! Good grief
No disrespect, there should be limitations on age for Judges. Yes hes knowledgeable, its that the laws change all the time. Hes more stuck in the 80s, and 90s as far as his responses are. Yes people should be punished for their acts. I also don't think JURORS, should be allowed to choose someone's fate. I've seen cases where Jurors may be Racially bias, Sexist, or show favoritism to who they can relate with. They don't always go by the evidence. The laws need to be Changed on this. The attorney did a wonderful Job, even though her client was a stalker, for whatever reason. For the judge saying making a comment saying even his phone pinged in a whole different county before, , shows he's been biased, and discredited evidence. Im not sticking up for the stalker, I just feel thats very unethical! I still domt see any circumstantial evidence, that he did it. Why hasn't anyone looked at the Girlfriend? She seems to be alot of drama, and lied many of times when asked about certain texts, that were presented right to her face!
If she is so sure that she doesn't know where the blood-stained evidence is coming from then why doesn't she find out she's a lawyer his lawyer trying to get him off on a murder trial.
She a terrible lawyer
Her saying Rosa was cheating on Saddy, he was leaving her & she seemed to pretty much imply Saddy was more serious and their relationship wasn’t serious…..Zachariah did not care if it was serious or not it was another man replacing him! I know defense attorneys are ruthless but some things with this broad seem unnecessary!
She reminds me of Nick Cruz with his female attorney and Jimmy Ray Rodgers and Katherine Fitzgeorge……they seem to be crushing on their clients and vise versa! I’m willing to bet she has been a stalker and ran off all guys she has dated except Zachariah Anderson! 😂
She is on the path of being a future Katherine Fitzgeorge (Jimmy Ray Rodgers attorney in Mark Seivers Conspiracy case) She 💯 reminds me of a young version of her with their Regina George and Atty Karen’s!
She is AWFUL with math! She talks about the cooperating inmate was housed with him for only 3 weeks Dec 2021 to Jan 31, 2022 🤔 and how he didn’t come forward until 2 years later. He came thru 3 weeks prior to trial and the trial was a year ago sooo I don’t think he came forward last month for a trial a year ago!
Do she think she's in a school 🚸 teaching children the law ⚖ he's definitely going down 👇
This case screams reasonable doubt everywhere
This is what Ivanka Trump would look like without surgery.
why is it there is always some douche bag to bring up someone's looks? And to top it off, bring politics into everything. What is wrong with you?
@@donnaq7626 Do you not see the resemblance?
This attorney beautiful I do not know what u talking about 😏
Sit down !
Boy, she is arrogant.
Lol in what way?
@@gmimi2 the way she speaks to the jury. Like their stupid.
It's one thing to be confident, but people don't like being spoken to like that. I wouldn't.
@@edwinacaparelli9911 I'm still watching and not getting the feeling from her at all. 🤷 You have a right to feel that way though!
@@gmimi2 eh, might be me.
Great to see the misogyny is rife in comments, Jesus full of women haters
This judge is the best judge I’ve ever witnessed. He did the Rittenhouse case. So at least this trial will be a fair trial.
Is Kyle Rittenhouse trial the only time you've seen this judge?
@@gmimi2 for me, yes ! But I was very impressed with how he tends to allow a defendant the right to a fair trial.
I went to high svhool , and played on the tennis team, with his daughter.
I'm shocked at the criticism of the defense attorney by some in the comments. She actually gave an excellent opening statement. In 30 minutes Nicole Muller exposed the state's case as a huge nothing burger. The cellmate snitch's testimony is worthless. The prosecution's timeline exonerates the defendant. No blood in the van, just a microdot of the victim's DNA which, if really there, is easily explained away. The victim left it there after entering the defendant's vehicle in retaliation for the defendant entering his. Buying Covid-19 supplies and work stuff at Walmart? So what? It means nothing except that the defendant purchased Covid-19 supplies and work stuff. So far, this case screams reasonable doubt. The defense lawyer gave such an outstanding opening statement that the prosecutor felt compelled to interrupt her. His dirty trick was too late. She had already dismantled his entire case.
Boy you were so right in this comment. It’s a shame he got convicted on absolutely no evidence. His family, who sat behind him everyday are getting him a retrial. I sure hope they succeed. Yeah, I cannot believe the ignorance in these comments, wow.
Oh also IT WASNT EVEN THE VICTIMS DNA! It was only proven to be a males dna, that could be any male in the world!
@@Mytube777 I agree with you.
@@ChuckRosseel
Well then, I am still not sorry I agreed with your comment… nor that you didn’t agree with mine.
@@Mytube777 I apologize. I thought your comment was tongue-in-cheek. I do agree with you.
Tax care card is a scam don't click on it they make money u waste your time
This “ Nicole Muller” is horrible lol anyone that pays this lady needs help . Be better off buy in a law book and represent yourself 😮
He’s guilty. I’m an attorney, and this is how you know he’s guilty. His atty pronounced “miscellaneous” “MisKolaneous”, his atty soo unlikeable, he has a man-bun.