Henry with a cockney accent..maybe but who knows how Henry spoke but one thing is for sure he was a real gangster. It totally works Winstone at his Best.
this is historically wrong. Aske met with Howard the 3rd Duke of Norfolk, not the king himself, Norfolk met Aske with the kings promise of a general pardon. The king would never meet personally with a 'traitor'. definitely as his son and heir Edward VI was less than a year old at this point, meaning if he died the throne would most likely go to Cromwell, or Edward VI's uncle Edward Seymour the Duke of Somerset (which it did in 1547 when Henry died) as regent, as both of Henry's daughters had been declared illegitimate for the throne in the succession acts of 1533 and 1536. also, they missed one of Aske's demands which was for a parliament to be held in York within a year. just saying, ITV needs to get their facts right
Cool clip and I thought the acting between Sean Bean and Ray Winstone to be quite good. Didn't Henry break his promises later on to Robert Aske? It's been a while since I have seen the series.
If I may borrow a quote from Thor; the likes of Sean Bean, Henry Cavill, Antony Hopkins and even Master Winstone here were born to be kings. (or at least, PLAY them)
@celebration81 But what you're saying is that there was a stronger country, yes, but that doesn't make TUDOR England terrible. There may have been other countries with a better army, or more people (by the way, a higher population isn't always a signal of greatness), but Tudor England was prosperous and a great country.
The Scene is with Yorkshire Rebel, "Robert Aske" and he is bargaing w/Henry for safe passage and return to York (eventually, he was convicted and executed for High Treason). During the Reformation, the North Provinces, were full of Roman Catholics who did want to accede to Henry's wishes, and recognize him as Head of the Church.
I love this scene, one of my favorites of Sean's work, the menacing yet cool tone of his voice, Sean speaks in a low growl, ultra sexy and such a powerful, spellbinding performance! Colleen in California
Spain and England were enemies primarily due to Henry VIII refusing to acknowledge the Roman Catholic church. He then went and destroyed all the monasteries, killed many of the monks, stole all their money, gave the land to his friends and persecuted anybody else who had Catholic beliefs. It was (shock and horror) a war caused by religion.
The man being led away is infact Cromwell but the scene has been "staged" as a ploy to dupe Aske. Aske and his Rebels were causing Henry a great deal of problems, and Henry needed to get Aske to "back down". Henry did not mean a word he said to Aske, during this negotiation. He was a monster!
Sorry-BARGAINING. Aske is also attempting to bargain with Henry to cease in taking down the Churches, and killing Clergy Men and Women, in exchange to put down his arms, and no longer lead the York Rebellion against Henry.
The Pilgrimage of Grace was a major uprising in the north in protest to Henry VIII's breaking with the Catholic Church. Here Henry meets with the leader, Robert Aske and they agree a settlement. Ultimately Henry knew he couldn't win, had he not given in they likely would have put his daughter Mary on the throne. Trusting Henry's word, Robert Aske dismissed the Pilgrims, Henry betrayed them and executed Robert Aske, and the other leaders. Now leaderless, Henry was able to crush the movement.
First fo all it was'nt medieval England back then it was TUDOR ENGLAND. Second of all it may have been a small country but it was a very wealthy country and not long after Henry VIII reign had a MASSIVE and POWERFULL Navy and army and in the height of its power owned 1/4 of the world known as the BRITISH EMPIRE so I think England has left a bigger foot print on the world than Hungary ever could so maybe before you run down England you shuld go study our history a little better.
Yes it was important in TUDOR times. We broke away from the Catholic Church and where at war with France and many other nations. Besides I dont care about Hungary's history. If I did I would be on a Utube video about the history of Hungary!! Im English and proud of my history. I just think you jealous of English history.
Sean Bean is not Cromwell, Cromwell was a protestant who arranged for Anne of Cleves to marry the king (which got him killed) and was earlier allied with Anne Boleyn. Casting says he's Robert Aske, who I don't know who that is. The removed person may actually be supposed to be Cromwell, he appears to be wearing the chancellor's necklace.
@celebration81 Yeah, of course- that's why England won so many wars, grew in wealth and culture, was ruled by powerful men and women. Oh, and by the way- Henry VIII's period isn't even Medieval, it's early modern ;) Get an English lesson.
You're quite right - although I never said the war was due to the DotM. I implied it was because of the difference in religion (Protestant vs Catholic). I added the monastery bit to force the point. Maybe I could have worded it better. I'm not sure where you're going with the Elizabeth thing though. We're talking about Henry. (Original question is a few pages back). Whilst the DotM may have been logical, surely you'd admit it was antagonistic to anybody of the Catholic faith?
I always have a hard time, "I know not why," watching a British costume drama in which characters speak like modern Englishmen, when we KNOW they spoke as "thee" and "thou" and "yea, verily, in sooth"; I suppose it's so modern English-speaking audiences can understand them better, but it takes something away. It's like watching a pirate movie where they don't say "shiver me timbers" or a Western where they don't say "howdy partner"; you get the feeling it's missing something.
y yo me pregunto¿cómo un actor como Sean Bean no se ha podido convertir en algo más?,porque sería muy famoso en Inglaterra,antes del SDLA...pero,viéndolo,en películas como esta y en Caravaggio por ejemplo,pudo haber sido un "Brat Pitt"..de su generación:¿no?..No como galan,que también,sino para ayudarle más en sus interpretaciones y poder elegir más..¿o realmente,no quiso más?...
Robert Aske was a fool to think the King would spare him!
This is so unrealistic Aske was respectful of the king he did not see him as his enemy
Henry with a cockney accent..maybe but who knows how Henry spoke but one thing is for sure he was a real gangster. It totally works Winstone at his Best.
this is historically wrong. Aske met with Howard the 3rd Duke of Norfolk, not the king himself, Norfolk met Aske with the kings promise of a general pardon. The king would never meet personally with a 'traitor'. definitely as his son and heir Edward VI was less than a year old at this point, meaning if he died the throne would most likely go to Cromwell, or Edward VI's uncle Edward Seymour the Duke of Somerset (which it did in 1547 when Henry died) as regent, as both of Henry's daughters had been declared illegitimate for the throne in the succession acts of 1533 and 1536. also, they missed one of Aske's demands which was for a parliament to be held in York within a year. just saying, ITV needs to get their facts right
Jessica Blackburn so true. The Tudors was more realistic of aske
@@ak9989 Actually, The Tudors were even less so. Aske was not reported to have a wife or family, yet that series depicted him as having them.
Historical accounts differ. Some historians claim that Aske did meet with the King himself to discuss terms on behalf of the Pilgrimage of Grace.
Even if that's not what happened, I admire both of them! Ray Winstone and Sean Bean are great actors! And this role is one of Sean's best roles!!
Sean Bean challenges kings in Westeros + English history !
Both these men give such compelling performances in this clip that I actually got chill bumps. Both very strong. Thanks for sharing!!
this is better than tudors
Yes!
Cool clip and I thought the acting between Sean Bean and Ray Winstone to be quite good. Didn't Henry break his promises later on to Robert Aske? It's been a while since I have seen the series.
Henry VIII was a mad king and a mad king is the most dangerous thing ever.
Ray Winstone is the best Henry VIII.
Absolutely agree with you.
I love the Tudors, but I think Ray Winstone makes a much better Henry
I don't like the Series "The Tudors", but I love this great film.
This is one of the best films I have ever seen. Helena Bonham Carter and Ray Winstone are pefect as Anne Boleyn and Henry VIII.
If I may borrow a quote from Thor; the likes of Sean Bean, Henry Cavill, Antony Hopkins and even Master Winstone here were born to be kings.
(or at least, PLAY them)
@celebration81 But what you're saying is that there was a stronger country, yes, but that doesn't make TUDOR England terrible. There may have been other countries with a better army, or more people (by the way, a higher population isn't always a signal of greatness), but Tudor England was prosperous and a great country.
The Scene is with Yorkshire Rebel, "Robert Aske" and he is bargaing w/Henry for safe passage and return to York (eventually, he was convicted and executed for High Treason). During the Reformation, the North Provinces, were full of Roman Catholics who did want to accede to Henry's wishes, and recognize him as Head of the Church.
I love this scene, one of my favorites of Sean's work, the menacing yet cool tone of his voice, Sean speaks in a low growl, ultra sexy and such a powerful, spellbinding performance! Colleen in California
Spain and England were enemies primarily due to Henry VIII refusing to acknowledge the Roman Catholic church. He then went and destroyed all the monasteries, killed many of the monks, stole all their money, gave the land to his friends and persecuted anybody else who had Catholic beliefs. It was (shock and horror) a war caused by religion.
The man being led away is infact Cromwell but the scene has been "staged" as a ploy to dupe Aske. Aske and his Rebels were causing Henry a great deal of problems, and Henry needed to get Aske to "back down". Henry did not mean a word he said to Aske, during this negotiation. He was a monster!
Its a TV series called Henry VIII
I think you can buy it off Amazon or something.
When Im listening to Sean Bean,I think he and Richard Armitage have very similiar voices:calm,deep and sexy 🔝💜
hey may u please upload this whole movie PLEASE
Very inaccurate portrayal of Robert Aske. I don't even think he was a military man, let alone one who served alongside Henry.
Never let the truth get in the way of a historical drama
wow sean is really fascinating in this film!! well in true....sean is always wonderful!!!!
cool story, bro.
Sorry-BARGAINING. Aske is also attempting to bargain with Henry to cease in taking down the Churches, and killing Clergy Men and Women, in exchange to put down his arms, and no longer lead the York Rebellion against Henry.
the other guy sounds like Russell crowe. lol
Except is sober.
o i got chills
This second part of the series can be found anywhere. What a pity¡¡¡
Sean Bean RULZ
The Pilgrimage of Grace was a major uprising in the north in protest to Henry VIII's breaking with the Catholic Church.
Here Henry meets with the leader, Robert Aske and they agree a settlement. Ultimately Henry knew he couldn't win, had he not given in they likely would have put his daughter Mary on the throne.
Trusting Henry's word, Robert Aske dismissed the Pilgrims, Henry betrayed them and executed Robert Aske, and the other leaders. Now leaderless, Henry was able to crush the movement.
Thaaaaaaaaaanks so much for sharing! That's cool!
How stupid was Roger Aske (in this movie)?
First fo all it was'nt medieval England back then it was TUDOR ENGLAND.
Second of all it may have been a small country but it was a very wealthy country and not long after Henry VIII reign had a MASSIVE and POWERFULL Navy and army and in the height of its power owned 1/4 of the world known as the BRITISH EMPIRE so I think England has left a bigger foot print on the world than Hungary ever could so maybe before you run down England you shuld go study our history a little better.
Yes it was important in TUDOR times. We broke away from the Catholic Church and where at war with France and many other nations. Besides I dont care about Hungary's history. If I did I would be on a Utube video about the history of Hungary!!
Im English and proud of my history. I just think you jealous of English history.
Sean Bean is not Cromwell, Cromwell was a protestant who arranged for Anne of Cleves to marry the king (which got him killed) and was earlier allied with Anne Boleyn. Casting says he's Robert Aske, who I don't know who that is. The removed person may actually be supposed to be Cromwell, he appears to be wearing the chancellor's necklace.
@celebration81 Yeah, of course- that's why England won so many wars, grew in wealth and culture, was ruled by powerful men and women. Oh, and by the way- Henry VIII's period isn't even Medieval, it's early modern ;) Get an English lesson.
Snip snip
Er - 'University English??' wasn't around in Tudor times; and no one can be 100% sure of their pronunciation in those days.
You're quite right - although I never said the war was due to the DotM. I implied it was because of the difference in religion (Protestant vs Catholic). I added the monastery bit to force the point. Maybe I could have worded it better.
I'm not sure where you're going with the Elizabeth thing though. We're talking about Henry. (Original question is a few pages back).
Whilst the DotM may have been logical, surely you'd admit it was antagonistic to anybody of the Catholic faith?
I don't understand why Henry VIII has a cockney accent. Sean Bean is altogether more convincing: there is passion and sorrow in his voice here.
I always have a hard time, "I know not why," watching a British costume drama in which characters speak like modern Englishmen, when we KNOW they spoke as "thee" and "thou" and "yea, verily, in sooth"; I suppose it's so modern English-speaking audiences can understand them better, but it takes something away. It's like watching a pirate movie where they don't say "shiver me timbers" or a Western where they don't say "howdy partner"; you get the feeling it's missing something.
y yo me pregunto¿cómo un actor como Sean Bean no se ha podido convertir en algo más?,porque sería muy famoso en Inglaterra,antes del SDLA...pero,viéndolo,en películas como esta y en Caravaggio por ejemplo,pudo haber sido un "Brat Pitt"..de su generación:¿no?..No como galan,que también,sino para ayudarle más en sus interpretaciones y poder elegir más..¿o realmente,no quiso más?...
I've never seen this version. I would like to see this series. On youtube?
can someone please explain to me what is going on in this clip?
is this movie on youtube???
very nice :) love it....
@coolmamac I spoke too soon, 2-part series.
@coolmamac I think it's a movie
2003
When was this made?
that went well lol
Henry VIII.