*👉Cheek out MegaDrivingSchool Rewind 2022: ruclips.net/video/LLUbhzcjv_c/видео.html *👉Checkout Previous Compilation:* ruclips.net/video/o3GeVYfO6bM/видео.html *👉Submit your Dashcam video for the feature:* forms.gle/FnavwQg5WwkNkS6r8 *👉Or sent to Email:* megadrivingschoolyt@gmail.com
9:07 is a double fatality with three injuries. Debora Page, 62, and her grandson Jo’siah Fragier, 4, of North Charleston, SC were both killed in the crash at Rivers and Cosgrove Avenues that ended up involving seven vehicles, two of which caught fire. James Hart, 62, has been charged with two counts of reckless homicide for the collision. It's been reported that he was driving at 95 mph at the time of the crash. The speed limit at the intersection is 35 mph.
Personally, I'd have set bail at 200k-250k for each count. Honestly, though, nothing'd ever really be good enough. The whole damn thing is completely FUBAR.
Truth. His speed was 8 mph at beginning of video,and accelerated to 17 mph,even when it was clear that white suv was gonna pull out.Clearly intentional.
If he had rear ended the SUV then yea....maybe, but since the collision was on the left side rear of the SUV, it was that whole stupid wide angle lens thing. Sucks but that appears to be what happened. You can make an argument that the cammer was a space cadet, but no, definitely not crashing on purpose. I suspect that you are one of those drivers that thinks it is OK to pull out under the assumption that the other driver has to or will stop. Works in Korea, but not Merca.
@@brianv4100 Or legally blonde. I still think because the cammer did not hit the rear but the side without turning, that stupid wide angle lens thing was kicking in. But one thing is for sure, the space cadet cammer was not paying attention.
@@maxkane9276 like I said something happened most likely which I bet doesn’t happen every single day. You seriously just don’t know the context. It’s very easy to make fun of it.
@@Ghostca yeah definitely a phone, anxiety attack is a scam. They were not paying attention, seen cars moving and didn't even look up. I see people blow through stop signs or cut unprotected left turns all the time all while never looking up from the phone.
7:00 Why is it necessary to point out someone's race and gender? And why does that only seem to get pointed out when there's a clear intent to reaffirm a negative stereotype? Be better, people.
Good reason to get a rear dashcam too. I had no idea what had happened after watching the first clip (front view of truck which nearly got hit). And if the other camera hadn't shown the car which caused it was driving recklessly, I may have thought cammer had moved left too quickly and hit the white car.
I actually had a similar situation years ago. My rear cam caught a guy all over the road finally take out a utility pole. Posted online and turned out a coworkers daughter was with her friend in the car behind the same driver and recorded him from the rear taking out the pole. Talk about a small world lol.
@@theatremusician Not his responsibility to do so. Courtesy, yes, responsibility - nope. If more idiots got nailed like that there would be a LOT more cautious people on the roads.
@@amzarnacht6710 It most certainly IS the cammer's responsibility, EVERY driver has a duty to avoid collisions. Are you one of those twits who mistakes the cooperative human enterprise of traffic for a competitive zero-sum combat arena?
4:00 This is the exact reason you don't swerve out of the way. Culprit got away, and now the victim has to foot the bill. Let them hit you, then take the pay out.
I wouldn't say this is any kind of good example of why you shouldn't swerve. Guy going 70+ slamming into your driver side?? Sure you might not be footing the bill, but you might be paying with your life. You sound like a right moron.
You had the intro voice play like 4 times, and at the end you had the intro voice AND the outro voice play at the same time. You'd think with as much money as you make off of other people's content with minimal work, you'd actually watch the video before posting it.
15: It is against human nature, but NEVER swerve, let them hit you and it will be thier fault. As you have, probably, now found out, if you swerve and hit another car then you are responsible for the damages and the car that actually caused the wreck gets off scot free.
You're right. Anothing thing I teach others is also to never drive on someone's blindspot or in an area where the car can hit you. Drivers, when in panic, will swerve without checking first.
You do have to try to avoid it. Brake, but don't swerve. The last video, there were a couple of cammers that made no attempt to avoid an accident, just up and ran into them
An insurance adjuster friend said if you don't attempt to avoid an accident, chances are you will be 50% at fault. And if it's avoidable, especially low speeds, why hit the other car, then getting insurance and the police involved in the first place?
It happens so much because many people that submit clips don't really populate these channels all that much and they realize that there harrowing experience looks like a cry me a river event. But yea....it's almost a cliché and one of the main reason I don't like is, But you know what cammers never say? "don't believe the wide angle lens, I was on that drivers ass like stink on a pig"
9:07 is sadly gone. Why? Because of an IDIOT!!!!! Thank God this was on camera so the family can sue them for everything they have for taking their loved one(s) away in a second!! 😡😡😡
Sue all you want won't get money out of the penniless. I've got liens on three different people after suing them... haven't gotten a dime yet, but their credit rating is F*ed.
@@NickyD Thank you for your comment. Do you have a link? I’d really like to know more about that. I took screen shots by stopping/starting the video. It is literally nauseating. The one that rammed into the other went all the way to the driver’s seat since they were at a complete stop. It is as horrible as it gets. I can only hope there wasn’t a baby or children in the back. Those are the kind of accidents you hope no one survived because if they did, their injuries would be horrific.
@@amzarnacht6710 You are right about lawsuits. I think the reason I put that, rather than prison, is because it seems no one gets much punishment these days. They get a measly bond and are, sadly, out on the streets again in 5 seconds. That driver should be in prison forEVER for that.
@@NickyD Doesn't have to, it's patently obvious when the SUV's front right wheel is rolling through the center console at 70mph. Dude was doing 95mph at the moment of impact, igniting the vehicle he struck and went on to involve five other vehicles and injure at least three others to the point they required hospitalization. Oh, and they set his bail at 200k so it was probably posted and he's back out there on the road now since it'll take two years for his trial to make it through the backlog.
First guy blows through a red light on a right hand turn and then blares his horn at the moron driving in the wrong direction. It's like a Disney film where two star-crossed lovers find each other in a sea of people. Only instead of star-crossed lovers its shitty drivers.
#9 - 1:49 - Wow! Double Cammer video on the same incident! I also love that the red truck has the spatial awareness to completely avoid the white Miata. Bravo!
Well of course. The dashcam waives you of all responsibility for the accident. Remember: if it won't technically be your fault and you're recording it, always just let it happen to get that sweet, sweet victim status.
Anxiety attack is code word for texting and driving and not taking responsibility for your actions. Humans experience episodes of depression, anxiety, and panic often yet here's a huge group of people that think they are some cute diagnoses to have and brag about. Smh.
Anxiety attack or not, the cam guy should have payed attention and not hit the lady. This guy needs to take responsibility fir his crappy driving as well.
4:02 Cause you swerved, you are now at fault for the accident. If the white car has no dashcam, and none others gave their video, he will be at 100% fault.
EDIT: Comment withdrawn. Dude was 100% good. ORIGINAL COMMENT: 0:01 - Yeah, that person in the Ford car was 100% in the wrong. But that was not a proper turn for 2 reasons: 1) You are supposed to STOP before turning right on a red. 2) Look at the sign, my dude. You were not supposed to turn right on that red anyway! LOL
It's hard to see, but in the very beginning of the clip, it shows he has a green arrow for a protected right turn, which turns to amber after the point where he can safely stop.
Maybe you should carefully watch the clips next time before posting. The cammer had a green protected arrow that turned yellow just as he was turning. He did nothing wrong.
16:06 One "good deed" deserves another. Illegally parking across the sidewalk, violating ADA statutes, Hopefully they got the $2500 fine that goes along with it, then had to deal with insurance on the accident.
@@DQBlizzard_ Yes he did. If you look at the light more closely, there is a green turn signal for him to turn on. It turns yellow just as he was turning. You just have to watch the light itself.
2:36 That's a bunch of b.s. An anxiety attack doesn't make you change from braking to hitting the accelerator pedal. And you clearly didn't "freeze up" because you transitioned from braking to accelerating.
9:30 omg! how did the car just crumple like that!!?? Looked like an older car, so I'm thankful there is more technology and thought put into crumple zones. So sad for the people in that car :(
The second Uhaul clip. Why did you chase the car that backed into you? You had a clear image of their plate, and you could have just gotten out of the car and looked to see if there was any damage.
4:13 good thing to do in a situation like this is to hold your lane, especially if you’re not sure if someone is in the lane you’re swerving into. The truck makes no contact and leaves while the 2 other vehicles have to deal with their crash at no fault of theirs except the bad swerve from the driver in the left exit lane.
15. Hell they do this a lot in north western Virginia aswell. Extremely annoying. If you got people up your ass.....give em some wiggle room in a safe area to pass. I never go below the speed limit, but if I just want to drive that speed, I at least find an area to give a courtesy pass for somebody that wants to go zoom zoom on the twisties.
0:38 Something like this happening to me terrifies me. I’m lucky the car I drive has a blind spot camera on the right door, so I can see more clearly if the truck I am trying to pass crosses the line or not. My mom almost got hit once because he was drifting asleep while she was passing but she hit her brakes in time luckily. Her beeping sure woke him up lol. Ever since that incident I’ve been turning on that camera every time I pass a truck.
Big rigs do have mirrors mounted on their hoods to cover the blind spot. Getting the driver to always check them adequately before moving over is, of course, a different matter.
That last one. The kid didn't RUIN YOUR DAY! Maybe upset you or you thought about it but there was no accident. Totalling your vehicle would have ruined your day. I'd hate to see what you would say if you had gotten the wrong order in the drive through. Geez!
#7 failure to yield on wet roads or not, you could have braked and TRIED to avoid this collision. #10 lmao they didn't cut you off, you basically proceeded late which made room for them to get over.
1:17 This was a 50/50. The white ford should've looked to see if it's clear to turn first. For cammer, there was enough time to brake. I'm not sure why he didn't.
the subtitles are crying "I'm the victim, they're the offender" when in many cases both parties could have avoided the collisions, had they had their wits about them
3:00 While it may not have been very nice of him, he was making his next move very well known to you with his blinker for quite a while, you knew exactly what he was going to do and chose not to ease off the gas, so no need to pretend you're so surprised and give the little honk...
Actually, he did the least he could have done in that instance. Is one thing to need to change lanes, another to cut the line like that low life did. That was not a honk of surprise.
@@danielv7340 Of course it was, if it wasn't then why not honk before he changed lanes? Cammer knew what was about to happen but decided not to get off the gas
6:04 not accident related but cammer was listing to theepicnate315 about what I could only assume to be a fallout or Skyrim mystery. XD that’s awesome.
1:16 #7 Looks like the cammer was going slow enough to avoid that accident and just decided he was going to hit them to teach them a lesson for pulling out in front of him when he had the right of way. Pretty sure the insurance company is going to cite him because he did nothing to even TRY to avoid the accident.
5:10 this was obviously not a brake check. Yellow truck slowed down in antipication that Swift truck would pull to the left to avoid the stopped Xtra truck on right shoulder. Cammer was the idiot, don't tell me he couldn't have slowed down 10 mph to avoid this accident.
80 **thousand** pounds does not decelerate on a dime. Rental driver was an absolute idiot. Almost got hit a second time by the Swift truck (any truckers here who can verify the reputation of that company drivers' typical skill level?)
@@amzarnacht6710 of course it can't stop on a dime, but there was clearly an area larger than a dime between the yellow truck and the cammer. The cammer waited 4 seconds before even touching their brakes. Cammer also does not know what the definition of a brake check is.
It’s funny how many people go right at a green instead of giving it a couple seconds to see and how many people swerve I understand you want to but you risk hurting someone else just trying to protect yourself, just stay your ground with it
You mean look left and right before you go? I mean, if I am first in line I usually do that. Red light runners are actually pretty rare around here, but still happens, so seems like a good idea to be on the lookout for idiots "trying to beat the light."
4:57 wasnt a brake check. Driver of the truck panicked when the other semi was started moving over for the semi that was stopped in the breakdown lane. Simple case of situational awareness and the blame could be placed on the cammer for following to close. He knew well enough ahead of time that the yellow truck was going slower than him.
Looked totally on purpose and that did look like a brake check or the slowed down way too much with a semi that was already in the left lane but the cammer hit him because he got mad the had slowed down so much. When 2 idiots meet.
Agree with you that it wasn't a brake check and your reason why. But I don't think the cammer is to blame for following too close. Cammer kept plenty of distance between him and the truck in front. The yellow truck moved into cammer's lane with barely enough space (for a tractor trailer), then immediately and unexpectedly braked. Due to the slight curve of the road, Cammer had no way to see the truck in the breakdown lane. So had no reason to anticipate the yellow truck would suddenly brake to allow the truck in front of him to change lanes. 99.9% of the time a vehicle moves into the left lane like this, it's to pass the slower truck in front of him. The last thing you would expect is for him to change into the left lane, then slow down to let the truck he was presumably trying to pass, to also change to the left lane. The yellow truck was also going only slightly slower than cammer initially, so there was no reason for him to prepare to brake heavily. Cammer took less than 2 sec to begin braking after the yellow truck began braking. Which in light of the distance and assumption it was changing lanes to pass, I think is a reasonable reaction time. Just one of those bad situations which develops suddenly where there really isn't a good escape route for anyone. It's hard to even fault the yellow truck driver for changing to the left lane when he did since the space he left cammer, while marginal, is about what's commonly given if you're doing it with the intent to immediately speed up and pass. But ultimately I'd blame him because his reaction when the cammer blew his horn suggests he had no idea cammer was there (i.e. he changed lanes without checking his mirror).
The rental truck jumped over with less than a full semi length and then braked... yep, they're *going* to get hit because unless the driver wants to wreck their rig it takes twice that distance to slow appreciably and controllably. Rental stole the semi's braking distance, simply put, and paid the price. And then they cut off the Swift truck and almost got hit a **second** time.
Watching these compilations always leaves me in disbelief! It's alarming to see how some drivers behave on the road. Let's all remember to drive responsibly and prioritize safety
@14:26 looks like you were sticking out way more than you should have. Those UHAUL trucks don't have a great turn radius even if they aren't loaded. Next time just back up some if possible
I agree. A good truck driver can easily get that close safely. Many of the U-Hauls are rented by companies that need an extra truck for a day. So, some U-Hauls you see on the road are being driven by professionals. 2 trucks in a row both driving like that make me think that might have been the case, here.
2:50 You claiming freezing up from anxiety is total bs. If you're Frozen with anxiety how did you take your foot off the brake and put it on the gas? Secondly, you just admitted that you're a danger to the people around you. Don't drive, that's it, stop driving. There's a threat on the road and it's you.
4:02 This is the EXACT exit I take off of I-15 to get to work every morning. People driving diagonally off of the freeway to get to the exit last-minute is a daily occurrence.
2:40 Very interesting excuse for: I just went when everybody around me did, even though I was on my phone. Don't claim it's an "anxiety attack" if you're simply not paying attention.
That guy said “If you’ve enjoyed this video” not once but twice in the middle of this video. Unusual; usually happens at the beginnings & ends of each MDS video.
0:55 I'm really sick and tired of hearing about truckers blind spots. They have anywhere between 3 and 7 mirrors on each side of the truck, some with Windows in the lower part of the door. Truckers do not use all their mirrors they only use the easy ones which is why they cause these types of crashes. Yes I have driven a semi which is why I know how the mirrors work and the little window door.
It's funny reading the text at 4:10 from the people from Utah with the Chevy Silverado cutting across the lanes to make the exit. The mormons dont dare say "idiot" 😂😂😂
Always aim for the quarter panel if you have no way of avoiding the crash. If the car is 5 to 7 years old insurance will refuse to fix it and their car will be totaled. I have lost to very good older cars because of this, one was parked and the other I was stopped at a light and hit from behind. No matter what I did the insurance told me no.
I've been writing car insurance policies since 2007: Theres a several reasons why ins. companies don't want to fix older cars - or why they'd rather total the car. Whenever they pay a body shop, that shop is a defacto agent if you will - of the insurance company. If they perform a faulty repair & that repair plays a role in a future accident...see where I'm going w/this? Anyway that's one reason. Another is fixing older cars more or less takes longer than fixing newer cars. (generally speaking) and whenever a claim takes longer (per research done by Progressive in the 1980s & 1990's) the potential for litigation increases. Avoiding lawsuits saves money even if it means totaling out the car that could be fixed. A lot of companies out there have flex on this issue depending on the damage of course and in lieu of the currently crazy car market. Totaling the car does drive a small cottage industry for the insurance companies as well as wrecking/tow yards they work closely with (coughs) _AAA_ (coughs) ... won't get into it but let's just say some demand for used parts ... is artificially driven. Anyway sorry to ramble on but it's late, I'm tired and burned out. If you go into the insurance business...don't do it more than 10 years. It sux.
@@kettle_of_chris I have a friend that owns a body shop and after he took one look at both of the cars we lost. He told us they will never OK the repairs no matter how low the millage is. Both of them ended up at Co parts.
@@largelarry2126 Doesn't surprise me. I was trying to imply exceptions have been made & as these carriers will tell you "every claim is different" but yeah what you're saying is more routine than what most people would think. Repairing cars involved in accidents is risky and in the last 8 years or so - rather expensive too. So much so that the gap between repairing to factory standards and just replacing the car, is not as wide as it used to be. Especially considering the fact that they can make up some of that money on the back end w/the old car they "totaled out". So it's been more of a common practice than it used to be. Besides replacing the car (with a new car) which is almost zero risk and Insurance companies are all about two things: Minimizing Risk and Making Money. BTW I am not speaking about specialty insurance such as Hagerty, or Motorcycle Insurance. I can write both, but it represents a very small % of my business so my experience on the claims side of those categories is practically zip. Except to say that it seems like they make more of an effort to repair motorcycles _if they can be repaired_ than they do with cars but like I said my experience w/Specialty Insurance claims or Motorcycle claims is extrememly limited.
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 190 [USA & Canada Only]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/mxrw4P4SIXg/mqdefault.jpg)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 190 [USA & Canada Only]](/img/tr.png)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 198 [USA & Canada Only]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/BLkDoIrQrfU/mqdefault.jpg)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 159 [USA & Canada Only]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/GVe3jyujv_w/mqdefault.jpg)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 203 [USA & Canada Only]](/img/1.gif)
*👉Cheek out MegaDrivingSchool Rewind 2022: ruclips.net/video/LLUbhzcjv_c/видео.html
*👉Checkout Previous Compilation:* ruclips.net/video/o3GeVYfO6bM/видео.html
*👉Submit your Dashcam video for the feature:* forms.gle/FnavwQg5WwkNkS6r8
*👉Or sent to Email:* megadrivingschoolyt@gmail.com
9:07 is a double fatality with three injuries. Debora Page, 62, and her grandson Jo’siah Fragier, 4, of North Charleston, SC were both killed in the crash at Rivers and Cosgrove Avenues that ended up involving seven vehicles, two of which caught fire. James Hart, 62, has been charged with two counts of reckless homicide for the collision. It's been reported that he was driving at 95 mph at the time of the crash. The speed limit at the intersection is 35 mph.
i was wondering given that impact that kid in the back didnt feel a thing no way
No way he posted bail. Why was his bail so comically low? 200k
Personally, I'd have set bail at 200k-250k for each count. Honestly, though, nothing'd ever really be good enough. The whole damn thing is completely FUBAR.
What a POS, I hope he stays in jail for a long. There is absolutely no reason to go that fast on a surface street.
At the rate of any comment I post making me look bad I'll just use this posting as a "I agree" with the other comments here...
1:17 I do love it when people upload their videos thinking they are completely guilt free. Jeep could have completely avoided that.
Agree. He did nothing to try and avoid the accident.
He has a camera and have right of way.. so why should he brake..
This would be 50-50 in any other country.
@@dubious6718 He should brake to avoid an accident. Was that difficult?
@@gremlinn7 Apparently it is for most Americans.
Completely agree. Looks like he speeds up even.
1:17 dude, you 100% ran into them on purpose
Truth. His speed was 8 mph at beginning of video,and accelerated to 17 mph,even when it was clear that white suv was gonna pull out.Clearly intentional.
If he had rear ended the SUV then yea....maybe, but since the collision was on the left side rear of the SUV, it was that whole stupid wide angle lens thing. Sucks but that appears to be what happened. You can make an argument that the cammer was a space cadet, but no, definitely not crashing on purpose. I suspect that you are one of those drivers that thinks it is OK to pull out under the assumption that the other driver has to or will stop. Works in Korea, but not Merca.
Maybe not...the cammer might be legally blind 🥸
@@brianv4100 Or legally blonde. I still think because the cammer did not hit the rear but the side without turning, that stupid wide angle lens thing was kicking in. But one thing is for sure, the space cadet cammer was not paying attention.
since they didn't try to stop, probably looking at their phone.
2:41 had a panic attack while sitting at a red light? 🤔
exactly... by panic attack you mean looking at your phone
@@Ghostca something could have happened before they were driving. Y’all dumb use your head
You shouldn't be driving if you have an anxiety disorder this severe
@@maxkane9276 like I said something happened most likely which I bet doesn’t happen every single day. You seriously just don’t know the context. It’s very easy to make fun of it.
@@Ghostca yeah definitely a phone, anxiety attack is a scam. They were not paying attention, seen cars moving and didn't even look up. I see people blow through stop signs or cut unprotected left turns all the time all while never looking up from the phone.
7:00 Why is it necessary to point out someone's race and gender? And why does that only seem to get pointed out when there's a clear intent to reaffirm a negative stereotype? Be better, people.
9:24 is definitely a fatality
It was. This video was posted before. I believe it was a grandmother and her grandson.
@@shawneeandcrew 😢
Bro people need to pay attention when they drive smh. AND not speed like bat out of hell
To think that every time you drive, you’re easily SECONDS away from your life being ended is crazy.
@Y Nerf That was a ford explorer
1:44... Okay, that was actually kind of wild. The same accident from two different drivers with dash cams.
Good reason to get a rear dashcam too. I had no idea what had happened after watching the first clip (front view of truck which nearly got hit). And if the other camera hadn't shown the car which caused it was driving recklessly, I may have thought cammer had moved left too quickly and hit the white car.
I actually had a similar situation years ago. My rear cam caught a guy all over the road finally take out a utility pole. Posted online and turned out a coworkers daughter was with her friend in the car behind the same driver and recorded him from the rear taking out the pole. Talk about a small world lol.
And that guy didn't learn his lesson, went hammering out of there as soon as he straightened out.
1:16 I can't believe the driver of the white SUV made the cammer ram him like that. 😑
Gee, it wasn't like the cammer had plenty of time to brake and avoid the accident... oh wait...
@@theatremusician Not his responsibility to do so. Courtesy, yes, responsibility - nope.
If more idiots got nailed like that there would be a LOT more cautious people on the roads.
@@amzarnacht6710 it’s exactly half his responsibility, but only decent human beings would recognize that.
@@amzarnacht6710 It most certainly IS the cammer's responsibility, EVERY driver has a duty to avoid collisions. Are you one of those twits who mistakes the cooperative human enterprise of traffic for a competitive zero-sum combat arena?
It's a "Jeep thing"
2:34 this is what happens when you aren't paying attention and hit the gas when you see the car next to you go out of the corner of your eye.
Bingo!
Anxiety attack AFTER the incident?
4:00 This is the exact reason you don't swerve out of the way. Culprit got away, and now the victim has to foot the bill. Let them hit you, then take the pay out.
I wouldn't say this is any kind of good example of why you shouldn't swerve. Guy going 70+ slamming into your driver side?? Sure you might not be footing the bill, but you might be paying with your life. You sound like a right moron.
Sorry guys for another repost due to the copyright! Two more than we done with it. Thank you for understanding.
RUclips eh!
Hi
RUclips is “woketube” now
You had the intro voice play like 4 times, and at the end you had the intro voice AND the outro voice play at the same time. You'd think with as much money as you make off of other people's content with minimal work, you'd actually watch the video before posting it.
@@Wolfgangersen its not youtube its people who own these dash cams are reporting it
15: It is against human nature, but NEVER swerve, let them hit you and it will be thier fault. As you have, probably, now found out, if you swerve and hit another car then you are responsible for the damages and the car that actually caused the wreck gets off scot free.
You're right. Anothing thing I teach others is also to never drive on someone's blindspot or in an area where the car can hit you. Drivers, when in panic, will swerve without checking first.
You do have to try to avoid it. Brake, but don't swerve. The last video, there were a couple of cammers that made no attempt to avoid an accident, just up and ran into them
@Daniel Ulz That's what i tell people too, no one really seems to believe it somehow tho lol
Why involve someone else in your accident. That's the way I see it.
An insurance adjuster friend said if you don't attempt to avoid an accident, chances are you will be 50% at fault. And if it's avoidable, especially low speeds, why hit the other car, then getting insurance and the police involved in the first place?
9:15 is my biggest fear when it comes to driving
1:16 - When the police asked for both drivers’ license, registration, and proof of insurance, they were in braille.
I feel like #7 was on purpose, there's no way you couldn't have stopped in time
My thoughts exactly
Completely agree
2:41 looking at phone = anxiety attack? Just own up to it.
Enough already with the "closer than it looks" crap!
Exactly. If you're compelled to write that in the description before you send it in, just don't send it in. lol
It happens so much because many people that submit clips don't really populate these channels all that much and they realize that there harrowing experience looks like a cry me a river event. But yea....it's almost a cliché and one of the main reason I don't like is, But you know what cammers never say? "don't believe the wide angle lens, I was on that drivers ass like stink on a pig"
9:20 OMG ! the stationary car just disintegrated ! no one could survive that.
It was confirmed in one of the comments, they didn't.
19:41 Is that all it takes to ruin your WHOLE day? How fragile have people become?
Haven't you even considered how is 2014 RAM 1500 felt? How insensitive
9:07 is sadly gone. Why? Because of an IDIOT!!!!! Thank God this was on camera so the family can sue them for everything they have for taking their loved one(s) away in a second!! 😡😡😡
drive of that suv is on felony chargers
Sue all you want won't get money out of the penniless.
I've got liens on three different people after suing them... haven't gotten a dime yet, but their credit rating is F*ed.
@@NickyD Thank you for your comment. Do you have a link? I’d really like to know more about that. I took screen shots by stopping/starting the video. It is literally nauseating. The one that rammed into the other went all the way to the driver’s seat since they were at a complete stop. It is as horrible as it gets. I can only hope there wasn’t a baby or children in the back. Those are the kind of accidents you hope no one survived because if they did, their injuries would be horrific.
@@amzarnacht6710 You are right about lawsuits. I think the reason I put that, rather than prison, is because it seems no one gets much punishment these days. They get a measly bond and are, sadly, out on the streets again in 5 seconds. That driver should be in prison forEVER for that.
⚠️Trigger warning⚠️ Brutal and Fatal accident at 9:12 (was not expecting to see such a tragic accident such as this, kinda hard to watch ngl)
I was wondering if it was fatal. Gah dang the back end was into the engine bay. Hard to tell....looks like a early 90's Chrysler Lebaron?
it doesnt say if it was fatal or not
@@SaKOTR def 90's car of some sort didnt hold up well
@@NickyD it clearly is dude, look at how that car was smashed
@@NickyD Doesn't have to, it's patently obvious when the SUV's front right wheel is rolling through the center console at 70mph.
Dude was doing 95mph at the moment of impact, igniting the vehicle he struck and went on to involve five other vehicles and injure at least three others to the point they required hospitalization.
Oh, and they set his bail at 200k so it was probably posted and he's back out there on the road now since it'll take two years for his trial to make it through the backlog.
3:25 entitled clown in the red pickup, you should have taken his door off.
First guy blows through a red light on a right hand turn and then blares his horn at the moron driving in the wrong direction. It's like a Disney film where two star-crossed lovers find each other in a sea of people. Only instead of star-crossed lovers its shitty drivers.
0:01 If that is you turning properly... looked like you were speeding to make the light.
#9 - 1:49 - Wow! Double Cammer video on the same incident! I also love that the red truck has the spatial awareness to completely avoid the white Miata. Bravo!
Didn’t realise until watching the channel that owning a dashcam meant you could actually cause accidents 😂😂
Well of course. The dashcam waives you of all responsibility for the accident. Remember: if it won't technically be your fault and you're recording it, always just let it happen to get that sweet, sweet victim status.
Anxiety attack is code word for texting and driving and not taking responsibility for your actions. Humans experience episodes of depression, anxiety, and panic often yet here's a huge group of people that think they are some cute diagnoses to have and brag about. Smh.
If it was actually an anxiety attack, they clearly should not have been driving since they were impaired.
Definitely just a lame excuse for not paying attention. Lfmaoo glad I’m not the only one who thought that
Anxiety attack or not, the cam guy should have payed attention and not hit the lady. This guy needs to take responsibility fir his crappy driving as well.
@@RansomeStoddard what do you mean as well? The only guilty person here is the cammer.
@@kimberlycarrigan8824 true, the cammer is mostly to blame but the other idiot was blocking traffic, causing a hazard.
4:02 Cause you swerved, you are now at fault for the accident. If the white car has no dashcam, and none others gave their video, he will be at 100% fault.
EDIT: Comment withdrawn. Dude was 100% good.
ORIGINAL COMMENT:
0:01 - Yeah, that person in the Ford car was 100% in the wrong. But that was not a proper turn for 2 reasons:
1) You are supposed to STOP before turning right on a red.
2) Look at the sign, my dude. You were not supposed to turn right on that red anyway! LOL
It's hard to see, but in the very beginning of the clip, it shows he has a green arrow for a protected right turn, which turns to amber after the point where he can safely stop.
@@lugwrenchknucklebuster5256 I completely missed that until I saw your comment.
@@lugwrenchknucklebuster5256 Also, that was a Chevy Malibu. Lol
Maybe you should carefully watch the clips next time before posting. The cammer had a green protected arrow that turned yellow just as he was turning. He did nothing wrong.
@@sweetgracie1930 I stand corrected. Snarky message received.
1:17 Camera absolutely should be held responsible for that. He sped up and ran into them on purpose.
1:16 2 failures. One failure to yield and one failure to look up from phone.
1:21 The "wet roads" didn't stop Chris from accelerating into someone and causing an accident to prove a point. This behavior is so idiotic.
16:06 One "good deed" deserves another. Illegally parking across the sidewalk, violating ADA statutes, Hopefully they got the $2500 fine that goes along with it, then had to deal with insurance on the accident.
16:07 Sooner or later the city is going to say something about the vehicles blocking the side walk.
Either that or a kid will go off the sidewalk into the street and get hit.
#7 The cammer caused his own accident.
10:45 I remember this adorable guy from the last time this was posted.. "what do I say? Worldstar? Myspace?" lol
Oh ya... UlTiMaTe DrIvInG mAcHiNe boi... lol...
First clip - that driver was dangerous and it looks like you ran the red light.
I was wondering if anyone else saw that too. Smh like wow
You should look again. The cammer had a green right arrow that turned yellow just as he was turning. He did not run the red light.
@@sweetgracie1930 No he didnt... Theres even a sign that says he cant turn right on a red.
@@DQBlizzard_ Yes he did. If you look at the light more closely, there is a green turn signal for him to turn on. It turns yellow just as he was turning. You just have to watch the light itself.
Is #7 blind? You can see the white suv was already mid turn and you can hear the cammer flooring it
2:36 That's a bunch of b.s. An anxiety attack doesn't make you change from braking to hitting the accelerator pedal. And you clearly didn't "freeze up" because you transitioned from braking to accelerating.
#7 - is the cammer the scammer?
2:51 Sounds like a lame excuse for not paying attention. If you froze up, how come your accelerator foot was working?
I’m sure we all know why there isn’t a description at 1:20. You’ve gotta be the slowest reacting driver I’ve ever seen.
1:24 How do you hit that car?!?! Open your eyes!
#7 sped up to hit the other driver
9:30 omg! how did the car just crumple like that!!?? Looked like an older car, so I'm thankful there is more technology and thought put into crumple zones. So sad for the people in that car :(
The second Uhaul clip. Why did you chase the car that backed into you? You had a clear image of their plate, and you could have just gotten out of the car and looked to see if there was any damage.
He might have acted different if he had had the luxury of viewing the video like you did.
@@danstephens9500 hindsight is always 20/20
9:24 I need an update on this omg!
Someone above said both people in the car were killed. A grandmother and her grandson.
Another comment said it was a fatality, a grandmother and grandson 😞
@@imboredadr oh okay... my app is messing up and only showed 2 comments
At the 7 minute mark the Asian lady literally said, good luck everybody
4:13 good thing to do in a situation like this is to hold your lane, especially if you’re not sure if someone is in the lane you’re swerving into. The truck makes no contact and leaves while the 2 other vehicles have to deal with their crash at no fault of theirs except the bad swerve from the driver in the left exit lane.
15. Hell they do this a lot in north western Virginia aswell. Extremely annoying. If you got people up your ass.....give em some wiggle room in a safe area to pass. I never go below the speed limit, but if I just want to drive that speed, I at least find an area to give a courtesy pass for somebody that wants to go zoom zoom on the twisties.
0:38 Something like this happening to me terrifies me. I’m lucky the car I drive has a blind spot camera on the right door, so I can see more clearly if the truck I am trying to pass crosses the line or not. My mom almost got hit once because he was drifting asleep while she was passing but she hit her brakes in time luckily. Her beeping sure woke him up lol. Ever since that incident I’ve been turning on that camera every time I pass a truck.
Big rigs do have mirrors mounted on their hoods to cover the blind spot. Getting the driver to always check them adequately before moving over is, of course, a different matter.
2:36 #11 Jackie, that’s what happens when you just don’t pay attention…… 😆😆😆
4:12 next time dont swerve just hit the brakes. Now you are at fault as you hit the other car when changing lanes.
I never understood why people swerve like there’s no other vehicles on the road too. It’s such a stupid thing to do.
@ 19:30 - if that completely RUINED your day, you probably don't need to be behind the wheel...IJS.
#7 The bigger the light bar, the smaller the brain.
17:58 is my favorite clip. *Australien accent* “ Hey Sir/Ma’am you know you can’t park there?”
That last one. The kid didn't RUIN YOUR DAY!
Maybe upset you or you thought about it but there was no accident.
Totalling your vehicle would have ruined your day.
I'd hate to see what you would say if you had gotten the wrong order in the drive through. Geez!
#7 failure to yield on wet roads or not, you could have braked and TRIED to avoid this collision.
#10 lmao they didn't cut you off, you basically proceeded late which made room for them to get over.
1:17 This was a 50/50. The white ford should've looked to see if it's clear to turn first. For cammer, there was enough time to brake. I'm not sure why he didn't.
#1 is a dangerous driver
the subtitles are crying "I'm the victim, they're the offender" when in many cases both parties could have avoided the collisions, had they had their wits about them
3:00 While it may not have been very nice of him, he was making his next move very well known to you with his blinker for quite a while, you knew exactly what he was going to do and chose not to ease off the gas, so no need to pretend you're so surprised and give the little honk...
Actually, he did the least he could have done in that instance. Is one thing to need to change lanes, another to cut the line like that low life did. That was not a honk of surprise.
@@danielv7340 Of course it was, if it wasn't then why not honk before he changed lanes? Cammer knew what was about to happen but decided not to get off the gas
6:04 not accident related but cammer was listing to theepicnate315 about what I could only assume to be a fallout or Skyrim mystery. XD that’s awesome.
17:46 plenty of time for you to see their blinker and slow to let them in. Pay attention next time and maybe you won’t have close calls like this.
1:30 You had plenty of time to stop here.
@@loveoflearning936 I commented on his comment.
8:48 they collided because they were distracted at the fact that the cammer was filming in portrait for some reason.
8:18 "I'm movin' up and down, side to side, like a roller coaster!"
Hello, i live in Michigan, and i know it is near Meijer and dunkin dounuts it crazy
1:16 #7 Looks like the cammer was going slow enough to avoid that accident and just decided he was going to hit them to teach them a lesson for pulling out in front of him when he had the right of way. Pretty sure the insurance company is going to cite him because he did nothing to even TRY to avoid the accident.
I love how a lot of people are trashing the cammer too in the comments.
5:10 this was obviously not a brake check. Yellow truck slowed down in antipication that Swift truck would pull to the left to avoid the stopped Xtra truck on right shoulder. Cammer was the idiot, don't tell me he couldn't have slowed down 10 mph to avoid this accident.
80 **thousand** pounds does not decelerate on a dime. Rental driver was an absolute idiot. Almost got hit a second time by the Swift truck (any truckers here who can verify the reputation of that company drivers' typical skill level?)
@@amzarnacht6710 of course it can't stop on a dime, but there was clearly an area larger than a dime between the yellow truck and the cammer. The cammer waited 4 seconds before even touching their brakes. Cammer also does not know what the definition of a brake check is.
#18
First video with a swift driver that didn’t involve the swift driver
1:05
Got cut off by a vehicle getting the street view for maps bruh ain't no way 🤣🤣🤣
Neat to hear the slightly different credits. Just from this simple reflection alone you can hear how we've become less kind as a society. ✌️
We get it, 18 wheelers don’t stop on a dime. No need to explain
It’s funny how many people go right at a green instead of giving it a couple seconds to see and how many people swerve I understand you want to but you risk hurting someone else just trying to protect yourself, just stay your ground with it
You mean look left and right before you go? I mean, if I am first in line I usually do that. Red light runners are actually pretty rare around here, but still happens, so seems like a good idea to be on the lookout for idiots "trying to beat the light."
Number 10, words to live by
I agree, I was looking for this comment. Everyone is in such a hurry to get nowhere these days!
I really like that we get to see a multiple view of the same incident, posted back to back.
1:44
Is it just me or has anyone else noticed that the bigger the pickup truck , the bigger the as**ole driving it ???
2:42 Funny, that's also the exact thing that happens when you're looking at your phone and think traffic started to move.
2:36 seriously? If you have random anxiety attacks so severe that you “freeze up”, STOP DRIVING! And you drove into them, so how did that happen?
Can't tell for sure, but did the first cammer run the red light? Barely even slow down?
He definitely ran it.
1:20. Lol you had time to brake though😂
He spent that time staying on the gas and accelerating into him 😂
2:29 John Goodman is that you?
5:12 That was so useful to honk after you hit him. 🤦♂
4:57 wasnt a brake check. Driver of the truck panicked when the other semi was started moving over for the semi that was stopped in the breakdown lane.
Simple case of situational awareness and the blame could be placed on the cammer for following to close. He knew well enough ahead of time that the yellow truck was going slower than him.
Looked totally on purpose and that did look like a brake check or the slowed down way too much with a semi that was already in the left lane but the cammer hit him because he got mad the had slowed down so much. When 2 idiots meet.
Agree with you that it wasn't a brake check and your reason why. But I don't think the cammer is to blame for following too close. Cammer kept plenty of distance between him and the truck in front. The yellow truck moved into cammer's lane with barely enough space (for a tractor trailer), then immediately and unexpectedly braked.
Due to the slight curve of the road, Cammer had no way to see the truck in the breakdown lane. So had no reason to anticipate the yellow truck would suddenly brake to allow the truck in front of him to change lanes. 99.9% of the time a vehicle moves into the left lane like this, it's to pass the slower truck in front of him. The last thing you would expect is for him to change into the left lane, then slow down to let the truck he was presumably trying to pass, to also change to the left lane. The yellow truck was also going only slightly slower than cammer initially, so there was no reason for him to prepare to brake heavily.
Cammer took less than 2 sec to begin braking after the yellow truck began braking. Which in light of the distance and assumption it was changing lanes to pass, I think is a reasonable reaction time. Just one of those bad situations which develops suddenly where there really isn't a good escape route for anyone. It's hard to even fault the yellow truck driver for changing to the left lane when he did since the space he left cammer, while marginal, is about what's commonly given if you're doing it with the intent to immediately speed up and pass. But ultimately I'd blame him because his reaction when the cammer blew his horn suggests he had no idea cammer was there (i.e. he changed lanes without checking his mirror).
The rental truck jumped over with less than a full semi length and then braked... yep, they're *going* to get hit because unless the driver wants to wreck their rig it takes twice that distance to slow appreciably and controllably.
Rental stole the semi's braking distance, simply put, and paid the price.
And then they cut off the Swift truck and almost got hit a **second** time.
7: do you own brakes.
2:03 Idiots and wet roads are never a good mix.
Watching these compilations always leaves me in disbelief! It's alarming to see how some drivers behave on the road. Let's all remember to drive responsibly and prioritize safety
9:24
I want to throw up.
@14:26 looks like you were sticking out way more than you should have. Those UHAUL trucks don't have a great turn radius even if they aren't loaded. Next time just back up some if possible
I agree. A good truck driver can easily get that close safely. Many of the U-Hauls are rented by companies that need an extra truck for a day. So, some U-Hauls you see on the road are being driven by professionals. 2 trucks in a row both driving like that make me think that might have been the case, here.
@@danstephens9500 Plus, they WILL put anyone in one of those trucks. That is U-Haul's entire business model!
2:50
You claiming freezing up from anxiety is total bs. If you're Frozen with anxiety how did you take your foot off the brake and put it on the gas? Secondly, you just admitted that you're a danger to the people around you. Don't drive, that's it, stop driving. There's a threat on the road and it's you.
4:02 This is the EXACT exit I take off of I-15 to get to work every morning. People driving diagonally off of the freeway to get to the exit last-minute is a daily occurrence.
2:40 Very interesting excuse for: I just went when everybody around me did, even though I was on my phone. Don't claim it's an "anxiety attack" if you're simply not paying attention.
That guy said “If you’ve enjoyed this video” not once but twice in the middle of this video. Unusual; usually happens at the beginnings & ends of each MDS video.
0:55
I'm really sick and tired of hearing about truckers blind spots. They have anywhere between 3 and 7 mirrors on each side of the truck, some with Windows in the lower part of the door. Truckers do not use all their mirrors they only use the easy ones which is why they cause these types of crashes. Yes I have driven a semi which is why I know how the mirrors work and the little window door.
It's funny reading the text at 4:10 from the people from Utah with the Chevy Silverado cutting across the lanes to make the exit. The mormons dont dare say "idiot" 😂😂😂
14:20, well basically every single person with a Class C-DL and up can rent these trucks. So, yeah, anyone...
Always aim for the quarter panel if you have no way of avoiding the crash. If the car is 5 to 7 years old insurance will refuse to fix it and their car will be totaled. I have lost to very good older cars because of this, one was parked and the other I was stopped at a light and hit from behind. No matter what I did the insurance told me no.
I've been writing car insurance policies since 2007: Theres a several reasons why ins. companies don't want to fix older cars - or why they'd rather total the car. Whenever they pay a body shop, that shop is a defacto agent if you will - of the insurance company. If they perform a faulty repair & that repair plays a role in a future accident...see where I'm going w/this? Anyway that's one reason. Another is fixing older cars more or less takes longer than fixing newer cars. (generally speaking) and whenever a claim takes longer (per research done by Progressive in the 1980s & 1990's) the potential for litigation increases. Avoiding lawsuits saves money even if it means totaling out the car that could be fixed. A lot of companies out there have flex on this issue depending on the damage of course and in lieu of the currently crazy car market. Totaling the car does drive a small cottage industry for the insurance companies as well as wrecking/tow yards they work closely with (coughs) _AAA_ (coughs) ... won't get into it but let's just say some demand for used parts ... is artificially driven. Anyway sorry to ramble on but it's late, I'm tired and burned out. If you go into the insurance business...don't do it more than 10 years. It sux.
@@kettle_of_chris I have a friend that owns a body shop and after he took one look at both of the cars we lost. He told us they will never OK the repairs no matter how low the millage is. Both of them ended up at Co parts.
@@largelarry2126 Doesn't surprise me. I was trying to imply exceptions have been made & as these carriers will tell you "every claim is different" but yeah what you're saying is more routine than what most people would think. Repairing cars involved in accidents is risky and in the last 8 years or so - rather expensive too. So much so that the gap between repairing to factory standards and just replacing the car, is not as wide as it used to be. Especially considering the fact that they can make up some of that money on the back end w/the old car they "totaled out". So it's been more of a common practice than it used to be. Besides replacing the car (with a new car) which is almost zero risk and Insurance companies are all about two things:
Minimizing Risk and Making Money. BTW I am not speaking about specialty insurance such as Hagerty, or Motorcycle Insurance. I can write both, but it represents a very small % of my business so my experience on the claims side of those categories is practically zip. Except to say that it seems like they make more of an effort to repair motorcycles _if they can be repaired_ than they do with cars but like I said my experience w/Specialty Insurance claims or Motorcycle claims is extrememly limited.
It amazes me how many people will do something stupid then get indignant and act like they are the aggrieved party.
It's teh murikan way. lol