*👉Checkout Previous Compilation:* ruclips.net/video/A92x_Vw9gJo/видео.html *👉Submit your Dashcam video for the feature:* forms.gle/dMhP9qznKL11NLii6 *👉Or sent to Email:* megadrivingschoolyt@gmail.com
If you see someone backing out of a parking spot, give them room. I don't know why so many drivers just race up to the person backing up and inviting an accident. It won't save you any time getting 10 inches from the other guy's bumper.
6:54 I was just going to say exactly the same thing. This was like a mile away and cammer almost rested his bumper on the car. And then proceeds to ask the stupid question what did I do wrong even after tailgaiting. He might as well have opened the other persons car and jump into the back seat to see how close he could get🤦🏽♂
9:05 You really should have Googled how dumb it was for you to speed up and make sure you were next to that truck when you clearly saw it was coming into your lane. The other pedal and leaving your ego at home would serve you far better.
Also the cammer apparently was too busy being self righteous to realize the truck had his turn signal on and the cammer sped up and blocked him.. His own video would have put him at fault in an accident
It always amazes me to see how some drivers seem to feel they have some kind of right to claim the road which is shared with others. Maybe a young person without a lot of experience concerning the mass of a dump truck and its width?
6:54 Guy backing out was already in the street when the cammer came around the turn. Add that the two vehicles parked on the street would obscure the cammer as he was turning and being 5 or 6 car lengths away, the cammer should have just slowed down and let the guy backing out complete his maneuver. Absolutely no reason for the cammer to get impatient and crowd out the guy backing out.
@MatthewTheGreatest came here to say the same thing. It's amazing how many times the audio is removed and we're supposed to believe the cammer is NOT laying on the horn the whole time
@MatthewTheGreatest I mean, according to the caption at the beginning the cammer didn’t honk and the audio was only removed from the clip by Mega Driving School when it was uploaded because of copyrighted music
To be fair, she was probably spinning her head to the right when she heard the screeching, so wouldn't have been able to tell if the car had been impacted. The white Honda does a great job of hiding the blue pickup with trailer which was hit (it's invisible in the rear cam). So if she only saw the Honda swerving at the time of the sound of the impact, she would've assumed it hit their car.
Ive had a drunk guy turning at a stop light clip the back corner of my bumper, couldnt feel it but there was a white mark on my bumper and black one on his front bumper, he ran into a bar afterwards (already open half full alcohol containers in cup holders) and later was arrested after police waited for him around the bafs and he came back and drove around the block and got stopped.
3:50 now that's the first time I've seen somebody start in the RIGHT lane and end up in the LEFT lane in a double-left turn. Always other way around because drivers are too lazy to slow down and turn the steering wheel more?
Not the exit I get off to go to work. It's a bridge that goes over the interstate. Two lanes are for left turns to get on the interstate and the other two right lanes are for staying straight. There's no dashed lines as you turn at the light letting the drivers no which lane they are in so many drivers cut into the right line that stays straight instead of the far left lane.
Drive around in Indiana for about ten minutes and you will lose count of how many idiots do it. I think people here drive with their eyes closed except when they're texting...
2:13 "maybe he was high". There’s a person that’s never had a transmission problem. I’m not saying that’s how I handled it when my car wouldn’t go in drive but still…
Yeah, I've heard of that happening when I saw another vehicle like that with a driver going in reverse but in the correct direction for traffic. Can only get it into reverse and rather than paying for a tow they decide to drive backwards to a shop. Though at a quick search on the legality of it, it seems vague. "Can drive in reverse so long as it's reasonable to do so and safe." Reasonable and safe can be defined differently by different people. Like, the driver who is doing obviously thinks they can be safe in doing it, and it seems reasonable to them to drive themselves in reverse when they can't get into the drive gear.
@@Galiant2010 Some states are less vague. Nevada for example: NRS 484B.113 Limitations on backing. The driver of a vehicle: 1. Shall not back the vehicle unless such movement can be made with reasonable safety and without interfering with other traffic; 2. Shall not back into an intersection, on or over a crosswalk, or around a street corner; Then there's Georgia where I live now: § 40-6-240 (2017) (a) A driver shall not back a vehicle unless such movement can be made with safety and without interfering with other traffic. Like you said, driver may feel he can do it safely. But.. is he interfering with other traffic? I'd say yes. Lol
When I saw that, I immediately thought of a college friend whose car's transmission dropped reverse and second gear. Basically had to redline it from first into third while accelerating, and the only way to back up was to put it in neutral, crack the car door open, and push against the ground with your foot like the damn Flintstones.
@@rogerw-interested the car sped up. The space behind the car is irrelevant at that point. The car could have stayed at the same speed they were at before speeding up and whatever was behind isn't their issue.
As always it is the job of the merging party to merge safely regardless of what another person did they dont have to let you in and so long as they don't speed they can speed up all they want. Rude maybe but still they were in the lane they wanted to be in merging party wasn't his job to do so properly
@@bruceovelstein1022 I see it far differently then you obviously do. fact is, a light tap on the brakes and there would have been no incident. those who seem to think as you do, are responsible for the majority of these accidents or near misses. courtesy and common sense go a long way towards prevention of accidents.
4:20 TBF, I assume they heard the sound and just stopped, because they weren't sure where it was coming from. Once they realized it was behind (probably thanks to the honking), they then moved. No big deal as far as I can tell
Yeah, the truck was trying to edge over and avoid the bus, being a good driver. Would it have killed you to let him in? You must feel so manly for asserting your dominance here.
100% on truck driver: There were not enough space to make a lane change safely. He should have slowed down to let cammer go first or wait for the bus go first.
2:03 #6 - Story from years ago - Eccentric neighbor, owned one of the last Studebaker sedans, mild-mannered bow-tie type when this was an anachronism & not a symbol of 'cool', librarian at a local small college. Drove the Studebaker in reverse several miles to the mechanic shop, where they found a screwdriver jammed in the linkage.
"the truck who did a last minute lane change to avoid me DIDNT GIVE THE HONDA DRIVER enough stopping distance" EXCUSE me but how does the truck driver controls the space BEHIND his car again? what a stupid statement, the honda driver shouldve been taking his 2-3 car distance instead of tailgating.
No, if you come to a compete stop, but get rear ended, and then that car gets rear ended, both accidents are the fault of the 1st rear ender. Similarly if someone has to totally swerve to not rear end someone, and then another car rear ends you because they could not anticipate stopping that quickly, it is the car who swerved's fault. Same if they end up getting rear ended after swerving.
4:20 - People like this drive me nuts. For emergency vehicles, it's "yield right of way". It does not always mean stop. Sometimes it means keep going and get the hell out of the way! 6:35 - LOL! Mustang doing Mustang things.
Also, most of the time, you don't even need to do much beyond move, especially on the highway. The people that stomp the brakes down 25mph and get everyone swerving just cause probproblems. Just clear a lane for the flashing lights. And yes, that tow truck can absolutely do that too.
There's a good possibility that person didn't know where the siren was coming from for a moment and then figured it out. Blindly pulling up or pulling over the moment you hear a siren is crazy and dangerous.
I tried looking up the rules for North Carolina and NC DOT was useless. Our law states you must pull over and come to a complete stop until the emergency vehicle is 150 m past you.
@@viewer6726 In Oregon, it's more of a suggestion/yield right of way than a rule - "When an emergency vehicle approaches you from behind while you are stopped at an intersection, stay where you are unless you can pull to the right. On a 4-lane highway or street without barriers, both sides of traffic should pull to the right."
@@viewer6726 I am not from the US and pardon me if I offend your laws, but this sounds kind of silly to me. How does stopping your car help emergency vehicles pass? Even on a highway it sounds lot smarter to just make no sudden moves, move out of the way or even hit the gas to get out of the way later.
8:50 dude... you can see how things are, just lay off the gas a moment, it won't hurt. Complaining about the truck driver - well OK I guess, but that was basically nothing. Unnecessary drama
7:31 You almost caused a second accident because you forgot that you shouldn't be going that speed next to stopped vehicles for the exact reason we see on your own video.
@@johnt.848 There wasn't an accident so there's no victims in this case but thank you for pointing out that the person trying to change lanes was also a potential victim in this clip.
@1:25 I will say, at least he went straight to the shoulder and stayed there instead of trying to guess which way the other driver would swerve, which almost always ends in a head on. So there's that.
am i the only person thinking those guys didnt own that car at 5:10? Im just wondering, who buys a little 2 door sports car and then doesnt insure it? And then who jumps out of said car and abandons it after crashing it?
1:39 No.5 Why can't they just admit when they're in the wrong. 6:02 No.16 No doubt their high speed in the wet didn't help either. 7:39 No.20 & 7:54 No.21 & 8:26 No.23 Well done some people who remembers what the brake pedal does.
People just don’t care about running through stop signs or stoping at red lights any more, every time I stop at one I wait at least five seconds before going out.
@@tdog4891 you risk getting rear ended or having someone road rage at you because you wait a full 5 seconds before going. Just look both ways before going, kinda like crossing a street as a pedestrian. Do you also wait 5 seconds at a crosswalk? You're safer (more protected) in your vehicle than walking
5:20 If you go frame by frame near the onramp sped up video, and the short sped up video after, you can actually tell/see the cammer brake check the car behind them. As we say here, 1) Sped up video tries to hide things, and 2) people don't just react like that "for no reason". Brake checking a few times is a reason.
That's not what he's saying. The truck was the last vehicle in the incident who had to swerve around the cammer. Cammer said the truck didn't have enough following distance to the white Honda in front of them.
0:14 The most annoying is when the person who is blatantly in the wrong honks at you or shakes their head at you! I was driving in the right lane of La Brea Ave in LA (its a 3 lane road each way) and the person in the middle lane that I was passing, decided last minute, to turn right from the middle lane and then honked at ME!!! lol
LOL - yes that's what I'm realizing after a cross country trip and watching a bunch of these videos. Each state/region seems to have distinctive backgrounds and ways to design their streets, highways, buildings, etc. The Mexico clips for example are always obvious at a single glance.
I'd say most likely the driver in the blue car backing up on the highway was probably having transmission problems and the car would only go in reverse so to get it somewhere to get it fixed he had to drive it that way. i'd say he was probably just doing that in short bursts so as not to cause too much issue on the road but also not to get a ticket while getting it there. it wouldn't be the first time i'd see that happen!
I was at a stop light yesterday and a guy on my left pulled up in the left turn lane all illegal, and the light went green and he came in front of me from his right and I honked and he gave me the finger so, I gave it to his sister.
#11 - how rare it is to see the at-fault driver go check on the victim first without checking on their vehicle, as most people do. She actually RAN .... I love your clip, Tanner.
1:47 Offender claimed he was "flying in". If I was the cop, I would've asked him what the approximate altitude was before the cammer touched down! 😂😂🤣🤣 Maybe the moron will wear their seatbelt next time, but I wouldn't bet my life on it (they clearly are willing to sacrifice their's over their stupidity)!
8:40 Where are all the pedestrians in danger? I don't see a sole for as far as the eye can see. Apparently the mustang that came thru wiped them all out prior to your clip
0:21 - If I drove a Honda Insight, I'd probably try to total it out too. 😛 1:38 - I'm not sure what the posted speed limit is, but you're going between 40 and 45 mph, which seems perfectly reasonable given the road's width, gentle curves, and generous sight lines. You were maintaining a consistent following distance, neither gaining on nor falling back from the car in front of you - in other words, you were traveling with the traffic flow. I know you don't need justification, but it's pretty clear to me that you weren't "flying." 6:30 - Drivers like this are why many cars come equipped with Traction Control.
#2 "Drivers of North Carolina" was 100% in the wrong here. Didn't he see that guy who thought he was absolutely entitled to run everyone else off the road, even without a turn signal? How dare you inconvenience that ugly little car... 🤣🤣🤣
7:01 The person was already 2 tires into the street while you were kind of accelerating from 12-13mph to 24mph in like 2-3 seconds then stopping probably a 1/4-1/2 a car length at the tail end of him reversing. It happens pretty and it's irritating b/c from where the cammer was, you would've seen him backing up. Regardless, I would not be that close to someone backing up in case the person forgets to put it into Drive then bam......... =P
First, every state that I've been in it is against the law to back into a travel lane. Second, cammer came around a limited sight corner and stopped with plenty of room to spare. The guy pulling out was being a d**k, period. He would have sat there being an ass clown if that car coming the other way hadn't shown up. He had plenty of room to complete his illegal maneuver, otherwise the cammer would have had to backup. Just maybe he should learn the rules of the road and then learn to either turn around in his driveway, or how to safely back in.
@@paulday4763 This is a neighborhood and one should expect someone backing out of their driveway. Yes, it may be illegal for someone to back up into the street but how many officers/deputies are really pulling someone over and citing them for backing out of their driveway. From the camera view, yes, the view would've been blocked, from the driver side view, I would've been able to see it and I drive a low car. Plus if someone is turning right with a car parked on the corner, one should be a bit more cautious. The road he was on was a bit smaller should've taken the turn a bit more cautiously. The car was 3/4 of the way on the street even in the camera's view so the I'd call him "not being able to see him" BS. Maybe he did have plenty of room to backup but would you really want to be behind someone w/ just enough room or more room in case someone forgets to put the car in drive from reverse? Probably not. I don't trust any driver on the road.
At 7:56 the cammer says cars turning in a parking lot have to give way. WRONG. At an uncontrolled intersection (like in parking lots), the vehicle on the right has the right of way. It has nothing to do with who is going straight. The woman had the right of way and the cammer was supposed to yield
I don't think so. I think it was one of those police-wanna-be idiots that deck their vehicle out to be a police vehicle. Looks like puck antennas on the trunk, has the push bar on front. I can also see a partition on the inside. Could also be private security or dog unit.
15. Stop swerving left into traffic to avoid an accident because then you’ll actually be the one to cause it. If you’re near the shoulder, USE THE SHOULDER… that’s why it’s there.
1:45 While I know you have to take everything stated on the internet wit ha HUGE grain of salt, it's crazy how many people say "the guy was flying!" or something similar when they clearly forgot to look before moving.
I don't think it's because they're intentionally lying. People build up a mental map of what's going on around them. If their map doesn't include a car approaching from the left because they forgot to look, and after they pull out they look left and suddenly there's a car there, the logical conclusion (based on their flawed mental map) is because that car must have been flying to have gotten there so quickly. Anyhow, that clip is the exact reason why you're supposed to look left, right, left again before pulling out.
Something like that happened to me and a friend when we'd first gotten our drivers licenses. Leaving school and another kid pulled out from where he was parked on the side of the street, directly into the side of my friends truck as we were driving past him. He later tried telling the insurance company that we came flying around a corner right before he pulled out from where he was parked. The insurance company came back with "ok, so you basically just admitted fault".
They really need to lengthen and make the drivers test in America a lot harder. Also make it to where you can’t cheat and can’t do “special favors” for your drivers portion. Happens a lot.
1:09 Well, at least they all knew what purpose the lighted bunion in the back is supposed to serve...ohh, I know that highway! I know about 65% of San Antonio. 1:33 Keeps driving like that, that small suv is going to end up significantly smaller, in the very near future. 1:55 Bunch-a savages in that state... 2:40 Personally, I preferred when they pasted the name "Pacifica" on the suv model; that had an almost car-like appearance, like a lifted station wagon. Better-looking than the pocket-van that now flaunts the nameplate. 4:16 Well, to play devil's advocate here, at least the girl driving the blue car ran *towards* the car she hit, instead of *away* from it. Not too often I see somebody rush over to somebody they hit to check on them. 5:16 Just uninsured? Not stolen? Some others who have commented on this footage in other compilations opined that the car may have been stolen. They sure acted like they stole it...in fact, they acted like they wanted to run away before La Migra came on the scene to rope them. 6:21 Not very confident that footage could be used in court. A wily lawyer could argue it inadmissible because the date/time stamp doesn't match with the alleged date/time of the incident his client is being prosecuted over. That, folks, is why it's *imperative* to read the instructions that come with your dash-camera setup, especially the part about setting the date/time. It is a serious legal shield. This tidbit of legal advice comes to you, free of charge, from a retired paralegal. 6:50 Damn 'Stanks. On the other hand, at least it wasn't a Camaro; *those* drivers are nearly twice as obnoxious as 'Stank drivers (though still not quite *the* most obnoxious drivers on American roads). 7:51 Bunch-a savages in that state... 8:45 Too much Ram, not enough Dodge...
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 110 [USA & Canada Only]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nexYDhraLRI/mqdefault.jpg)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 110 [USA & Canada Only]](/img/tr.png)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 148 [USA & Canada Only]](/img/1.gif)
*👉Checkout Previous Compilation:* ruclips.net/video/A92x_Vw9gJo/видео.html
*👉Submit your Dashcam video for the feature:* forms.gle/dMhP9qznKL11NLii6
*👉Or sent to Email:* megadrivingschoolyt@gmail.com
Hi
PLEASE leve enough time to read the comment/description!
4:12 gotta respect that, doesn't go driving off after contact, RUNS to the other car before even checking her own vehicle, good person there.
If you see someone backing out of a parking spot, give them room. I don't know why so many drivers just race up to the person backing up and inviting an accident. It won't save you any time getting 10 inches from the other guy's bumper.
6:54 I was just going to say exactly the same thing. This was like a mile away and cammer almost rested his bumper on the car. And then proceeds to ask the stupid question what did I do wrong even after tailgaiting. He might as well have opened the other persons car and jump into the back seat to see how close he could get🤦🏽♂
exactly. i dont want my vehicles damaged if i can avoid it.
This is so true 💯. I always wait for the person backing up to get out, then I proceed. It doesn't hurt to wait a few seconds of your day.
Cause they’re impatient and/or thinks the world revolves around them
9:05 You really should have Googled how dumb it was for you to speed up and make sure you were next to that truck when you clearly saw it was coming into your lane. The other pedal and leaving your ego at home would serve you far better.
Also the cammer apparently was too busy being self righteous to realize the truck had his turn signal on and the cammer sped up and blocked him.. His own video would have put him at fault in an accident
It always amazes me to see how some drivers seem to feel they have some kind of right to claim the road which is shared with others. Maybe a young person without a lot of experience concerning the mass of a dump truck and its width?
I was thinking the same thing. So many accidents could be avoided if people left their ego behind them when they drove.
6:54 Guy backing out was already in the street when the cammer came around the turn. Add that the two vehicles parked on the street would obscure the cammer as he was turning and being 5 or 6 car lengths away, the cammer should have just slowed down and let the guy backing out complete his maneuver. Absolutely no reason for the cammer to get impatient and crowd out the guy backing out.
@MatthewTheGreatest came here to say the same thing. It's amazing how many times the audio is removed and we're supposed to believe the cammer is NOT laying on the horn the whole time
@MatthewTheGreatest I mean, according to the caption at the beginning the cammer didn’t honk and the audio was only removed from the clip by Mega Driving School when it was uploaded because of copyrighted music
“I swear to you, he hit you” tell me how you think this without feeling the jolt of an impact lmao
Probably saw it from the side mirror..
@@rpavlov33 saw . . . but not felt
Dude probably got out, saw nothing, got back in, and stared at her
To be fair, she was probably spinning her head to the right when she heard the screeching, so wouldn't have been able to tell if the car had been impacted. The white Honda does a great job of hiding the blue pickup with trailer which was hit (it's invisible in the rear cam). So if she only saw the Honda swerving at the time of the sound of the impact, she would've assumed it hit their car.
Ive had a drunk guy turning at a stop light clip the back corner of my bumper, couldnt feel it but there was a white mark on my bumper and black one on his front bumper, he ran into a bar afterwards (already open half full alcohol containers in cup holders) and later was arrested after police waited for him around the bafs and he came back and drove around the block and got stopped.
3:50 now that's the first time I've seen somebody start in the RIGHT lane and end up in the LEFT lane in a double-left turn.
Always other way around because drivers are too lazy to slow down and turn the steering wheel more?
Not the exit I get off to go to work. It's a bridge that goes over the interstate. Two lanes are for left turns to get on the interstate and the other two right lanes are for staying straight. There's no dashed lines as you turn at the light letting the drivers no which lane they are in so many drivers cut into the right line that stays straight instead of the far left lane.
Drive around in Indiana for about ten minutes and you will lose count of how many idiots do it. I think people here drive with their eyes closed except when they're texting...
1:00 car doesn't even budge an inch after coming to a screeching halt.
Her: "He hit you."
honda driver made a bad move
need to be right
Women☕️
2:13 "maybe he was high". There’s a person that’s never had a transmission problem. I’m not saying that’s how I handled it when my car wouldn’t go in drive but still…
Yeah, I've heard of that happening when I saw another vehicle like that with a driver going in reverse but in the correct direction for traffic. Can only get it into reverse and rather than paying for a tow they decide to drive backwards to a shop. Though at a quick search on the legality of it, it seems vague. "Can drive in reverse so long as it's reasonable to do so and safe." Reasonable and safe can be defined differently by different people. Like, the driver who is doing obviously thinks they can be safe in doing it, and it seems reasonable to them to drive themselves in reverse when they can't get into the drive gear.
That's what I was thinking. That maybe he was having transmission issues, and reverse was the only gear that was working.
@@Galiant2010 Some states are less vague. Nevada for example:
NRS 484B.113 Limitations on backing. The driver of a vehicle:
1. Shall not back the vehicle unless such movement can be made with reasonable safety and without interfering with other traffic;
2. Shall not back into an intersection, on or over a crosswalk, or around a street corner;
Then there's Georgia where I live now:
§ 40-6-240 (2017)
(a) A driver shall not back a vehicle unless such movement can be made with safety and without interfering with other traffic.
Like you said, driver may feel he can do it safely. But.. is he interfering with other traffic? I'd say yes. Lol
When I saw that, I immediately thought of a college friend whose car's transmission dropped reverse and second gear. Basically had to redline it from first into third while accelerating, and the only way to back up was to put it in neutral, crack the car door open, and push against the ground with your foot like the damn Flintstones.
Also probably someone that has never been high before
0:46 did anybody else watch the rear view and think the minivan was pulling the trailer?
Yup. I was really confused by the cammer saying the van didn't hit him, because I didn't see any other vehicle for the van to have hit...
at 9 minutes, homeboy was a turd for not letting the truck merge in.
Nobody drives defensively anymore, they don't realize that their driving 2 ton battering rams, sheeesh.
TBF you dont know the space behind the car, truck passing with turn signal on and trying to butt in isnt right either
@@rogerw-interested the car sped up. The space behind the car is irrelevant at that point. The car could have stayed at the same speed they were at before speeding up and whatever was behind isn't their issue.
As always it is the job of the merging party to merge safely regardless of what another person did they dont have to let you in and so long as they don't speed they can speed up all they want. Rude maybe but still they were in the lane they wanted to be in merging party wasn't his job to do so properly
@@bruceovelstein1022 I see it far differently then you obviously do. fact is, a light tap on the brakes and there would have been no incident. those who seem to think as you do, are responsible for the majority of these accidents or near misses. courtesy and common sense go a long way towards prevention of accidents.
4:20 TBF, I assume they heard the sound and just stopped, because they weren't sure where it was coming from. Once they realized it was behind (probably thanks to the honking), they then moved. No big deal as far as I can tell
My thought as well. Probably heard the siren but couldn’t tell which direction the ambulance was coming from.
Yup. Cammer's car looks like it's high enough to be an SUV or truck. So it probably blocked the front car's view of the ambulance.
“They probably turned so hard they ended up in the passenger seat…”😂😂😂
8:54 He had his turn signal on, and you sped up to cut him off.
Yeah, the truck was trying to edge over and avoid the bus, being a good driver. Would it have killed you to let him in? You must feel so manly for asserting your dominance here.
And even if he didn't, if you weren't looking far enough ahead to realize the truck *would* have to come over, then you're a bad driver.
"But, but, I was here first! And my fragile ego would have been bruised!"
100% on truck driver: There were not enough space to make a lane change safely. He should have slowed down to let cammer go first or wait for the bus go first.
5:10 they thought it was gta and the car was gonna blow up
2:05 when you've GOT to get to Subway but your transmission doesn't shift into drive
2:03 #6 - Story from years ago - Eccentric neighbor, owned one of the last Studebaker sedans, mild-mannered bow-tie type when this was an anachronism & not a symbol of 'cool', librarian at a local small college. Drove the Studebaker in reverse several miles to the mechanic shop, where they found a screwdriver jammed in the linkage.
"the truck who did a last minute lane change to avoid me DIDNT GIVE THE HONDA DRIVER enough stopping distance" EXCUSE me but how does the truck driver controls the space BEHIND his car again? what a stupid statement, the honda driver shouldve been taking his 2-3 car distance instead of tailgating.
The thought process of some people is truly baffling. So if some tailgater hits me, it's my fault for not giving them enough distance?
Agreed. Lack of driver education in the USA on display again.
No, if you come to a compete stop, but get rear ended, and then that car gets rear ended, both accidents are the fault of the 1st rear ender. Similarly if someone has to totally swerve to not rear end someone, and then another car rear ends you because they could not anticipate stopping that quickly, it is the car who swerved's fault. Same if they end up getting rear ended after swerving.
@@hughgolo8660 it’s because we hand out driver’s license like hot cakes
i wanna add that the honda isnt the one towing..., it was the car behind honda "tailgating"
4:20 - People like this drive me nuts. For emergency vehicles, it's "yield right of way". It does not always mean stop. Sometimes it means keep going and get the hell out of the way!
6:35 - LOL! Mustang doing Mustang things.
Also, most of the time, you don't even need to do much beyond move, especially on the highway. The people that stomp the brakes down 25mph and get everyone swerving just cause probproblems. Just clear a lane for the flashing lights. And yes, that tow truck can absolutely do that too.
There's a good possibility that person didn't know where the siren was coming from for a moment and then figured it out. Blindly pulling up or pulling over the moment you hear a siren is crazy and dangerous.
I tried looking up the rules for North Carolina and NC DOT was useless. Our law states you must pull over and come to a complete stop until the emergency vehicle is 150 m past you.
@@viewer6726 In Oregon, it's more of a suggestion/yield right of way than a rule - "When an emergency vehicle approaches you from behind while you are stopped at an intersection, stay where you are unless you can pull to the right. On a 4-lane highway or street without barriers, both sides of traffic should pull to the right."
@@viewer6726 I am not from the US and pardon me if I offend your laws, but this sounds kind of silly to me. How does stopping your car help emergency vehicles pass? Even on a highway it sounds lot smarter to just make no sudden moves, move out of the way or even hit the gas to get out of the way later.
Certified Gold!!!!!
2:53 What does this throttle thingy do?
8:50 dude... you can see how things are, just lay off the gas a moment, it won't hurt. Complaining about the truck driver - well OK I guess, but that was basically nothing. Unnecessary drama
Why am I not surprised #13 didnt have insurance and did the stupid crap they did.....
7:31 You almost caused a second accident because you forgot that you shouldn't be going that speed next to stopped vehicles for the exact reason we see on your own video.
Don't get me wrong the other car needed to do a better job but 100% don't speed by stopped or extremally slow moving traffic.
always expect a car getting out of a stopped lane
not to mention that the cammer seems to have forgotten what the blades at the base of their windshield do, or how they are controlled...
Wrong, nice victim blaming.
@@johnt.848 There wasn't an accident so there's no victims in this case but thank you for pointing out that the person trying to change lanes was also a potential victim in this clip.
5:03 Illegal Aliens unlawfully operating a motorized vehicle???
@1:25 I will say, at least he went straight to the shoulder and stayed there instead of trying to guess which way the other driver would swerve, which almost always ends in a head on. So there's that.
Also good job by the cammer squeezing as far to the right as he could, in case opposing traffic needed to intrude into his lane to avoid a head-on.
Awesome video
5:00. Damn that other driver really can’t drive smh. No traffic and you still rear ended someone. Tragic.
Anyone want to talk about what it was they were carrying out of the car? Was that a toddler?
@@RCorvinus looks like a dog to me, a pug mabey
I hardwired my first dashcam 2 days ago and someone rear ended me yesterday , lol I’m excited to send it in (no damage)
am i the only person thinking those guys didnt own that car at 5:10? Im just wondering, who buys a little 2 door sports car and then doesnt insure it? And then who jumps out of said car and abandons it after crashing it?
No, you're not.
1:39 No.5 Why can't they just admit when they're in the wrong.
6:02 No.16 No doubt their high speed in the wet didn't help either.
7:39 No.20 & 7:54 No.21 & 8:26 No.23 Well done some people who remembers what the brake pedal does.
6:40 - "What's up?" Oh, it's just Mustang, doing Mustang things. Likely confused because there were no spectators on the curb to hit.
😆
@@rayh493 I just noticed the guy in the video said the same thing I said lol. Now I don't feel so humorous, SADNESS!
7:00 that suv absolutely had the right of way
8:22 that was a huge overreaction
3:06 He got carried away, literally.
3:00, Someone should add the Benny Hill theme to that
People just don’t care about running through stop signs or stoping at red lights any more, every time I stop at one I wait at least five seconds before going out.
I certainly don't care about stoping at red lights as I'm not sure what that even is. I absolutely do care about stopping at red lights though. 😉
5 seconds is a bit absurdly long time to wait. Just look both ways before your proceed. If it looks like someone isn't going to stop, don't go
@@entarr2604 I don’t want to risk getting in to a accident because some idiot ran the red light.
@@tdog4891 you risk getting rear ended or having someone road rage at you because you wait a full 5 seconds before going. Just look both ways before going, kinda like crossing a street as a pedestrian. Do you also wait 5 seconds at a crosswalk? You're safer (more protected) in your vehicle than walking
5:20 If you go frame by frame near the onramp sped up video, and the short sped up video after, you can actually tell/see the cammer brake check the car behind them. As we say here, 1) Sped up video tries to hide things, and 2) people don't just react like that "for no reason". Brake checking a few times is a reason.
Regardless, when the other driver starts with the extreme stupid, pull over & let him go.
1:59 "Chevy 1500 (driver) ... is at fault for everything." I wondered who to blame for the Nika Riot of 532 AD.
Chevy driver was also at fault for the extinction of the dinosaurs.
4:45 the utter stupidity it takes to veer across multiple lanes of the interstate, ALL the way across, after following too closely to stop, wow.
1:16 Your second sentence makes no sense. Why would the driver behind you be responsible for the stopping distance for the driver behind them?
That's not what he's saying. The truck was the last vehicle in the incident who had to swerve around the cammer. Cammer said the truck didn't have enough following distance to the white Honda in front of them.
Several incidents here that could be solved by easing off the gas pedal for two seconds.
5:08 The important thing is that the dog is fine.
4:08 Well you don't see that very often. The person who caused the accident actually more concerned about the other person than their own vehicle!
@3:55 that’s Wilson, NC 😭 nash & airport intersection. The busiest area of Wilson
You are correct.
The lack of basic driving etiquette is the real road rage catalyst. Watching this is both infuriating and terrifying.
1:58 No airbag, that must have hurt like hell
no seat belt? In 2022? wtf
0:14 The most annoying is when the person who is blatantly in the wrong honks at you or shakes their head at you! I was driving in the right lane of La Brea Ave in LA (its a 3 lane road each way) and the person in the middle lane that I was passing, decided last minute, to turn right from the middle lane and then honked at ME!!! lol
Because they are rulers of the road and we are naught but lowly peasants to grovel at our magesty's feet.
@@thelunchlady8276 lmao fro real its how it feels right? lol
9:06 21st-Century Howard Stern in a nutshell.
0:24 A First Generation Honda Insight (2000-2006) has right of way in any circumstances because it is the best hybrid ever made.
last clip, my hometown. not the first ive seen from there and probably not the last.
Anyone else have the ability to identify what state the drivers are in just by how the intersections/highways look
LOL - yes that's what I'm realizing after a cross country trip and watching a bunch of these videos. Each state/region seems to have distinctive backgrounds and ways to design their streets, highways, buildings, etc. The Mexico clips for example are always obvious at a single glance.
well in most it says what state and country they are in at the top of the screen so idk if most people are bothering trying to do that lol
@@supposedly1-2 i only look after I've made a guess 😭
I can sometimes! Usually the route signage does it for me.
Jumping out of a moving car is a thing people do when they STOLE the car!
the guy in the 3 minute range with the scoter is hilarious. Guess that's the reason why the slang term for them is liquor sickle. FLY NAVY!!!
The person driving in reverse drives better backwards than a lot of other drivers driving forward. He was probably just feeling like Burt Reynolds.
I'd say most likely the driver in the blue car backing up on the highway was probably having transmission problems and the car would only go in reverse so to get it somewhere to get it fixed he had to drive it that way. i'd say he was probably just doing that in short bursts so as not to cause too much issue on the road but also not to get a ticket while getting it there. it wouldn't be the first time i'd see that happen!
0:05 I think she was expecting you to make a stop for non existent pedestrians ;-)
5:58 Excuse me what? The person swerved and had zero chance of catching it. Quite why they swerved into traffic rather than the shoulder is beyond me
Lmao literally
I was at a stop light yesterday and a guy on my left pulled up in the left turn lane all illegal, and the light went green and he came in front of me from his right and I honked and he gave me the finger so, I gave it to his sister.
Babe come over! I can't! My car only has reverse! But my parents aren't home!
#23 Seems like the cammer didn't need to brake that hard and just veer about 4 feet to the right and save some brakes.
She is a liar, he didn’t get hit
She's a LIAR, DUMP HER. IF SHE LIES ABOUT THIS WHO KNOWS WHAT ELSE SHE'LL LIE ABOUT
MyNewModAccount needs to take the protective blue film of his lens.
7:25 and the "Stupid decision of the day" reward goes to *this* cammer.
7:20 dude going WAY too fast next to an active lane of traffic. Just because you can do freeway speed, doesn't mean it's safe to do so.
1:26 just to save a few seconds
6:49 I said to myself ah a Mustang doing Mustang things. Then the description popped up LMAO great minds think alike i guess.
first time being this early wowzers
1:17 The truck doesn't need to give any distance to the car behind you berk, they give themselves distance.
#11 - how rare it is to see the at-fault driver go check on the victim first without checking on their vehicle, as most people do. She actually RAN .... I love your clip, Tanner.
7:00 His deal is you crawling up his ass. (Surprised Pikachu face). You already know, dude.
1:47 Offender claimed he was "flying in". If I was the cop, I would've asked him what the approximate altitude was before the cammer touched down! 😂😂🤣🤣 Maybe the moron will wear their seatbelt next time, but I wouldn't bet my life on it (they clearly are willing to sacrifice their's over their stupidity)!
8:40 Where are all the pedestrians in danger? I don't see a sole for as far as the eye can see. Apparently the mustang that came thru wiped them all out prior to your clip
Wooo
0:21 - If I drove a Honda Insight, I'd probably try to total it out too. 😛
1:38 - I'm not sure what the posted speed limit is, but you're going between 40 and 45 mph, which seems perfectly reasonable given the road's width, gentle curves, and generous sight lines. You were maintaining a consistent following distance, neither gaining on nor falling back from the car in front of you - in other words, you were traveling with the traffic flow. I know you don't need justification, but it's pretty clear to me that you weren't "flying."
6:30 - Drivers like this are why many cars come equipped with Traction Control.
Honda Insights get crazy good gas mileage. With Biden in office and the chip shortage, the last thing you want is to total that car.
#2 "Drivers of North Carolina" was 100% in the wrong here. Didn't he see that guy who thought he was absolutely entitled to run everyone else off the road, even without a turn signal? How dare you inconvenience that ugly little car... 🤣🤣🤣
5:12 It's what you do if you stole the car.
When your dash cam comment is, driver in front vehicle didn't give enough stopping distance for rear vehicle, you don't understand how driving works.
Ive seen all of this in person, people r insane.
7:01 The person was already 2 tires into the street while you were kind of accelerating from 12-13mph to 24mph in like 2-3 seconds then stopping probably a 1/4-1/2 a car length at the tail end of him reversing. It happens pretty and it's irritating b/c from where the cammer was, you would've seen him backing up. Regardless, I would not be that close to someone backing up in case the person forgets to put it into Drive then bam......... =P
I think the GPS speed has a lot of delay. Also my dashcam has it. After the cammer saw the guy backing up, he braked.
@@gabriele_diecast4836 Yeah depends on the cam. But it's only a about a 1/4 -1/2 sec delay. I use it all the time when I track my car
Yeah, camera driver got WAY too close to the person backing out of the driveway. Which is probably why he opened up his door to say something.
First, every state that I've been in it is against the law to back into a travel lane. Second, cammer came around a limited sight corner and stopped with plenty of room to spare. The guy pulling out was being a d**k, period. He would have sat there being an ass clown if that car coming the other way hadn't shown up. He had plenty of room to complete his illegal maneuver, otherwise the cammer would have had to backup. Just maybe he should learn the rules of the road and then learn to either turn around in his driveway, or how to safely back in.
@@paulday4763 This is a neighborhood and one should expect someone backing out of their driveway. Yes, it may be illegal for someone to back up into the street but how many officers/deputies are really pulling someone over and citing them for backing out of their driveway. From the camera view, yes, the view would've been blocked, from the driver side view, I would've been able to see it and I drive a low car. Plus if someone is turning right with a car parked on the corner, one should be a bit more cautious. The road he was on was a bit smaller should've taken the turn a bit more cautiously. The car was 3/4 of the way on the street even in the camera's view so the I'd call him "not being able to see him" BS. Maybe he did have plenty of room to backup but would you really want to be behind someone w/ just enough room or more room in case someone forgets to put the car in drive from reverse? Probably not. I don't trust any driver on the road.
5:13 dope bros. XD
2:27 that specific 300, however, is discontinued.
7:49 Curious how you know the driver was coming from Massachusetts solely based on the license plate attached to the vehicle they are driving?
@5:20 I love to see fellow dashcamers from Omaha! The drivers here are terrible.
If I did not have a horn I couldn't drive and a dashcam.
5:45. Lmfaoo wow.
At 7:56 the cammer says cars turning in a parking lot have to give way. WRONG. At an uncontrolled intersection (like in parking lots), the vehicle on the right has the right of way. It has nothing to do with who is going straight. The woman had the right of way and the cammer was supposed to yield
@5:19, Was that an unmarked car?
I don't think so. I think it was one of those police-wanna-be idiots that deck their vehicle out to be a police vehicle. Looks like puck antennas on the trunk, has the push bar on front. I can also see a partition on the inside. Could also be private security or dog unit.
@@Lightjug okay. I feel as if things like that should be illegal.
15. Stop swerving left into traffic to avoid an accident because then you’ll actually be the one to cause it. If you’re near the shoulder, USE THE SHOULDER… that’s why it’s there.
1:45 While I know you have to take everything stated on the internet wit ha HUGE grain of salt, it's crazy how many people say "the guy was flying!" or something similar when they clearly forgot to look before moving.
I don't think it's because they're intentionally lying. People build up a mental map of what's going on around them. If their map doesn't include a car approaching from the left because they forgot to look, and after they pull out they look left and suddenly there's a car there, the logical conclusion (based on their flawed mental map) is because that car must have been flying to have gotten there so quickly. Anyhow, that clip is the exact reason why you're supposed to look left, right, left again before pulling out.
Something like that happened to me and a friend when we'd first gotten our drivers licenses. Leaving school and another kid pulled out from where he was parked on the side of the street, directly into the side of my friends truck as we were driving past him.
He later tried telling the insurance company that we came flying around a corner right before he pulled out from where he was parked. The insurance company came back with "ok, so you basically just admitted fault".
0:45 The Honda and the Nissan both made abrupt lane changes to avoid rear ending the cammer. Both responsible.
3:57 The red is off on that Shell station
5:00 what the actual f*** is happening?? 🤦🏻♂️
Looks like a stolen car. Grabbed all their shit and hopped the barrier.
2:07 "maybe he was high" YEAH on METH.. no pot head would friggen do that..
If you lose control of a 4 banger Mustang, you know you suck at life.
They really need to lengthen and make the drivers test in America a lot harder. Also make it to where you can’t cheat and can’t do “special favors” for your drivers portion. Happens a lot.
7:37 Slow down dude. You never go those speeds with stand still traffic right next to you for this very reason. Kinda on you as well.
Especially in the rain and at night!
9:03 Just GIVE WAAYYY. It is so EASY.
6:52
@5:24 - the sped up footage was to hide the cammer's brake check of the other nutjob (playback at 0.25 speed and you'll see it).
1:09 Well, at least they all knew what purpose the lighted bunion in the back is supposed to serve...ohh, I know that highway! I know about 65% of San Antonio.
1:33 Keeps driving like that, that small suv is going to end up significantly smaller, in the very near future.
1:55 Bunch-a savages in that state...
2:40 Personally, I preferred when they pasted the name "Pacifica" on the suv model; that had an almost car-like appearance, like a lifted station wagon. Better-looking than the pocket-van that now flaunts the nameplate.
4:16 Well, to play devil's advocate here, at least the girl driving the blue car ran *towards* the car she hit, instead of *away* from it. Not too often I see somebody rush over to somebody they hit to check on them.
5:16 Just uninsured? Not stolen? Some others who have commented on this footage in other compilations opined that the car may have been stolen. They sure acted like they stole it...in fact, they acted like they wanted to run away before La Migra came on the scene to rope them.
6:21 Not very confident that footage could be used in court. A wily lawyer could argue it inadmissible because the date/time stamp doesn't match with the alleged date/time of the incident his client is being prosecuted over. That, folks, is why it's *imperative* to read the instructions that come with your dash-camera setup, especially the part about setting the date/time. It is a serious legal shield. This tidbit of legal advice comes to you, free of charge, from a retired paralegal.
6:50 Damn 'Stanks. On the other hand, at least it wasn't a Camaro; *those* drivers are nearly twice as obnoxious as 'Stank drivers (though still not quite *the* most obnoxious drivers on American roads).
7:51 Bunch-a savages in that state...
8:45 Too much Ram, not enough Dodge...