I recently got this car and with AMG real sound it sounds really good, for me it's the sweet spot between loud and very loud (v6) and with all the new tech, i'd take the new one over the old c43 any day.
@@EyesonEnforcement911 incorrect lol. Try one in the real world and you will see. I owned both of them for long enough to know better then some bias RUclips videos
The v6 model was rated from factory at 0-60 in 4.5 seconds. However, in the real world, we have routinely seen 0-60 in 4.2 seconds. It is possible that as this 2023 gets broken in, and with the right tires, it could hit 0-60 in 4.3 seconds.
I bought this and at 200 miles, engine light came out with the car shaking at all times and revving itself while in park. Service said valve springs broke and it’ll be 4 weeks for the part to arrive. Is the car defective or could this be caused by pushing the car before the break in period ? Worried that issues will keep coming up now.
The car is faster to 60 and has more hp. The mpg is the same if not slightly better if you look at the stats. The 0-60 from factory is always under stated and a check on car and driver will tell you the true difference.
I have a mercedes e450 . I am planning to get a amg model . But is insane how MB have downgrade this entry level amg . I have the opportunity to drive it interior buttons terrible . I looks cheap . I dont like 4 cylinders engine it doesn't sound good and very expensive .
![1 WORST And 8 BEST Things About The 2024 Ford F150 [Powerboost Hybrid]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4h1joGOZ4OQ/mqdefault.jpg)
It sounds way better than EU specs probably due to different emission regulation.
And is way more cheaper then in EU
I recently got this car and with AMG real sound it sounds really good, for me it's the sweet spot between loud and very loud (v6) and with all the new tech, i'd take the new one over the old c43 any day.
I have the new c43, 4.6 seconds is a lie. I draggy 3.94 seconds 0-60mph a week ago lol
Doesn't change the fact that the W205 C43 is faster lol just look up videos on RUclips
@@EyesonEnforcement911 incorrect lol. Try one in the real world and you will see. I owned both of them for long enough to know better then some bias RUclips videos
C43 will do 3.9
you are wrong bro 0-60 is 3.9
Correct
Great video, keep up the good work
🙏
Sounds nice
The v6 model was rated from factory at 0-60 in 4.5 seconds. However, in the real world, we have routinely seen 0-60 in 4.2 seconds. It is possible that as this 2023 gets broken in, and with the right tires, it could hit 0-60 in 4.3 seconds.
Car and driver tested it at 3.9
I bought this and at 200 miles, engine light came out with the car shaking at all times and revving itself while in park. Service said valve springs broke and it’ll be 4 weeks for the part to arrive. Is the car defective or could this be caused by pushing the car before the break in period ? Worried that issues will keep coming up now.
LEMON
Defective car.
@@theholt2ic219 yes they approved a buy back but they charging me for the 200 miles lol
What do you mean by "pushing the car".
Yeah you shouldn't be revving a car above 4k rpms before break in is complete.
Post Covid Mercedes are so bad. Avoid!
car and driver says 0-60 is 3.9
W205 C43 > W206 C43
this model needs 4,6 sec 0-100 kph !
The 0-60 miles time is 4,2 sec
0-60 3.9
O-60 3.9 seconds *Car & Driver
I own this model. Why am I watching this.
🤷♂️
Why the 0 to 60 added
Heavier, more weight.
I've seen people do 4.2 seconds in this one too though so I'm not sure why it's rated at 4.6
@@vikdrives2529 German manufacturers always underestimate 0-60 times
@@brianhurtado0 I suppose but I almost feel like they shouldn't in this case to convince people that the new engine is in fact very impressive
I want to emphasize WHY are we getting a car that makes LESS horsepower and LESS mpg.
I dont understand.
sounds like you can afford a S class - you are no body and know nothing about a car
I just bought a 2020 coupe. The c 43 is doomed
The car is faster to 60 and has more hp. The mpg is the same if not slightly better if you look at the stats. The 0-60 from factory is always under stated and a check on car and driver will tell you the true difference.
@@haseebhashimi6707 you just cant afford a new one.
Love it. Cant wait to pick one up
Just saw one rolling around in the Wild yesterday and it looked pretty cool!
Not reliable
@@boukm3n says who
You still ended up with an M340I. Which I would get also
Incorrect ! it does not have a broader power band. peak torque does not come on until 5000 RPM previous was around 2K
I have a mercedes e450 . I am planning to get a amg model . But is insane how MB have downgrade this entry level amg . I have the opportunity to drive it interior buttons terrible . I looks cheap . I dont like 4 cylinders engine it doesn't sound good and very expensive .
Mercedes quality is now less than Kia
Too much tech for my taste also very expensive
Not getting that engine
I don't like the plastic on the door, it is a downgrade!
Sounds like a Golf R
Hm.. slow, expensive, and old tech.
It's definitely not slow, it's more than enough power for daily driving, which is what this car is built for.
old tech? yea no
Stupid comment
old tech🤔🤔