Try to remove the narrow religious extremist prejudice from your brain & only then you would understand what do the words "colonisation" and "settlement" mean.
@@ghazanfardar1630cultural subjugation is the worst kind as it destroys the social fabric of a civilisation- see what happened in Mesopotamia, Persia and Egypt - language, religion, society and its people all destroyed. Mughals were invaders, some of them decided to settle down and pushed their culture and religion but people pushed back and that’s the reason Bharat/ India is still strong and will continue to gain strength of a super power (its natural state) and there is nothing invaders can do about it!
@@GSR356 The Muslim rule of India did not begin with the Mughal Empire. A strong Indo-Muslim society based on pluralism and tolerance had already evolved after the Arabs rule of Sindh & with the establishment of Delhi Sultanate. India survived and progressed due to successful fusion of various cultures, religions and languages. Today, you are telling us that India would become a superpower very soon. Had you had any knowledge of history, you would have known that India's GDP was 27% of the world GDP under the Mughal Empire which at that time was more than the GDP of China and America. India's industrial production was 25% of the global industrial production. During the Delhi Sultanate, some historians' estimate is that India's GDP was around 40% of the world GDP. India was the largest economy & military power of the world during the reign of Delhi Sultanate and the Mughal rule. You can only understand this if you read the history and come out of your low narrow thinking of a religious extremist & prejudiced mindset. Hindus and Muslims had lived peacefully and intermixed even to the extent of interfaith marriages in a secular tolerant society. It was only after the end of Mughal Empire that the Indian society degenerated and religious bigots like you propped up & made the Indian society a hostage of religious extremism. Better come out of it and open your eyes to the reality and historic truths.
And yet many Hindus got convert to Islam..! With will...!!! My great grandfather was one of them...! Love from Pakistan... My grandpa came here from Jaipur. He was a Rajput converted Muslim!
@@khushboo0786that "will" is just a garb to not feel embarrassed. Neither you have any proof that it was a choice nor i can prove that it was forced in ur particular case...but the Islamic rulers have categorically mentioned in their biographies that they used to forcefully convert ppl as a religious duty . Nobody can live with the fact that they were forced to join a religion so they tell their descendents that this was a choice...I know you gonna come back and argue this but that's a fact
@@khushboo0786 most of the muslim rulers in their biography proudly say how they killed, humiliated or forcefully converted Kafirs so you know.......when today's taliban, alqaeda, ISIS, boko haram etc. in present modern day is this fanatic just imagine how they would be in the radical medical period....
@@ranand089 Muslims have never been like this That's why many people have accepted Islam..! Zheng hi went to Indonesia they became Muslims, Indian Muslims and Pakistani Muslims were formerly Hindus but they chose islam..! You can say it was force but if Muslims actually had to force anyone You won't find Hindus anymore they stayed there for very long time everyone would have become a Muslim until now... They Muslims Stayed in Spain and whoever got converted went to Morocco or other countries after European reconquest the land..! Muslims haven't converted people forcefully... It has never happened in history... You can say that about Christianity it's their history where a Native American said if there are people like you in heaven I'd love to go to hell..! When they were killing and tried to convert them..! Indonesia Malaysia they're prime Example of being a good Muslim and even in South India most influence in not of Mughals or other so called invaders ... In south Indian region islam was not brought by any invader but by a Man Ubaidullah in 661CE... Through Lakshdeep and Malabar coast ... Way before BinQasim that's why South Indian Muslims are more pure Muslims...! I am sure about Muslims never did any violence except for Ummayad empire Bin Qasim and Hijaaj were also from that empire and They're the Same empire who killed kind of the Holy prophet..! How can you call them Muslims??? Only by their names??? I also don't like Hijaaj bin yousuf or Bin Qasim.. I'm Sindhi and Raja Zaahir was my hero not because of his religion but bcz he was following everything just like the teaching of Islam..! On the other hand there were Ummayad who have killed Imaam Hasan and Imaam Husain and their families!!! 😓😥😥😥😓😥😓 Many Indians associate islam with invasion but way before that Ubaidullah have sent the message of Islam and Many South Indian Muslims became Muslims not by force or anything and there's a verse in Quran that says.. : *There's no compulsion in religion*** So there's no way a Muslim Man would force anyone to become the part of Ummah...! There's also another example Param Singh also became Yazdan sheikh... Not by force and there are many stories of people converting to islam by themselves... Islam has been doing administration of people but they never converted anyone specially by force!!
Mughal empire ,Aurangzeb shifted last 27 year of his life to Conquer Deccan and he died in 1707 .Battle of Panipat in year 1761 Maratha lost and after that Punjab Pakistan and Kashmir was under Sikh empire till 1851
Sikh indeed helped shah alam...against Marathas...hearing Sikhs are coming Marathas tan away from Delhi when shah alam sister asked for Sikh sardars to intervene...Britishers even changed their plan to capture Delhi..hearing Sikhs are there...pata nahi history ke important points miss karte hai ye log...Arte madam g ...kitaabe aur bhi hai ...yaa RUclips oehe search kar lo...nahi to QAZI NOOR MOHAMMAD Jo ke abdali kee Saath aaya thaa..usne Sikh sardaro ke baate me Kya likha USS wawt...jab abdali aur sikho ke jungg chall Rahi thee...Apne QAZI ko he par lo...
That wealth was not exported from India during and before Mughal rule is not correct. Wars of Central Asia and Persia and MughAls were funded by the raids and plunder of this land. Even the wars between the British Empire and Napoleon were funded by Indian wealth. Infact one main aim of EIC was to ensure the French did not succeeed in raising funds from India, which had a telling impact on the wars in Europe
You are trying to argue from a position of ignorance and lack of knowledge of history. Use your mind & read some history to become educated on such matters.
@@ghazanfardar1630 bhaisahab aapke lafzo me ek bhi counter facts kam aur bakwas jyada dikh raha hai upar jo mahoday ne bola uske saboot upasthit hai ek ggl searches pe aap counter facts present kar sakte hai ki mughals wealth extract nai karte the
@@Sobanhassan1761 No. You just need to read primary sources which are available in digital libraries of many reputed Universities. And avoid reading history sponsored by the radical left.
@@Sobanhassan1761 Muzammil is not a historian. He is a journalist. The speaker should quote from primary sources and avoid storytellers like Trushcke. She should use Afif, Kalhans, Barani and Badayuni.
14:34 well one thing is for sure, throughout the the Sultanat and subsequent Mughal rule, there's not one Indian innovator/discoverer/scientist whose name comes forward in influencing the global narrative. Most of the innovation and discovery space os captured by westerners during this period. In contrast, preislamic india is full of such examples of pioneers in science
You seem to be a highly prejudiced religious extremist who has closed his mind and eyes to the realities and history. During the Mughal rule, India's industrial production was 25% of the world. The British colonisers carried out de-industrialization of India. Better open you mind & read some books to gain adequate knowledge of history.
Ofcourse as you never taught about islamic golden age ohh sorry all innovations done by Hindus why not you do now atleast you have a 1.4 billion useless population
17:15 its not fairness its just their compulsion to treat hindus little better than prior muslim dynasty because they don't want to lost power when aurangzeb tried you know what happened Satnami revolt jat revolt Silh revolt maratha revolt rajput rebellion Bundelkhand rise bengal bhusna revolt Himachal bilaspur revolt And lastly the marathas who force him to died in deccan
Central Asia se mogul aaye to central asia me konsa aisa architectural structure hai jo mughalo ne waha se laya? Dikhta no nahi. To Taj mahal indian architect se he banaya huva hona chaahiye
@@DrStrange234 Ha to bhai jab waha itni sammruddhi thi toh yaha kya karne aaye they??? 😅 Ek example dedo na west of Afghanistan K Mughlo ne pehle ye banaya tha Farhana main aur fir yaha aa k uska replica banaya... Secondary thing is Persion Architect main Mughalo ka koi bhi yogdan nahi tha..q ki jo Persian architectural design famous Hui wo sab Cyrus, Darius etc. k time and usse pehle ki thi... Tisri baat yaha aake Jo 2-4 cheeze banayi jaise ki Taj Mahal toh bhai banane k liye paise aur resources kaha se aaya?? Lol kuch bolte ho to logic to rakkho yar...
Mugals are not portrayed so bad in India ..if u read books of Indian history they are all praise of Mughals..India ke bare me perception bannana chodiye
According to European archives Mughals killed more Indians/Hindus than Hitler, Stalin, Pol pot and Mao Zedong combined.....Period from Taimur to Aurangzeb was the bloodiest period in human history.
Mughals destroyed Nalanda and Vikramshila universities while British established Calcutta,, Mombay, Madras... Universities. Mughhals established Harams while Britsh brought railway network throughout India. Mughals destroyed temples, imosed Zazia on Hinudus while British did not destroy any mosque or temples, every one free to follow ones religion.....
Fact. Mughals did not rule India. The rule parts. Bits and pieces. Fact. The majority of Muslims in India TODAY have no relation to the Mughuls. Almost all of them converted to Islam with the sword at their throats. Fact. The Mughuls had no great cultural gravitas. But as they had a Moslem “empire “ in India, they adopted Persian (Iran) culture and language. This suggests they were invading barbarians. Fact. The Hindu Marathas ruled India for 100 years between Mughuls and East India Company eventually Britain. Fact. There was never a Pakistan. Pakistan came into being in 1947.
@@vijaynair6161 Fact... Fact1: Muslims came to India way before Bin Qasim and Many people from South Indian origins came to islam willingly but no Indian will talk about it..! Fact2: Islam has ruled Spain but never converted anyone forcefully.. Because Quran says **There's no compulsion in religion*** Fact Islam has never Ruled Indonesia or Malaysia they were Hindus and idol worshippers but when Zheng he a Chinese Muslim trader went there they liked the idea of Islam and accepted it willingly and today Indonesia is highest populated Muslim country! Fact: Bin Qasim and Hijaaj etc were from Ummayad whom Indians hate and legal them as Muslims but they are the same people who killed the kins of the Holy prophet! Fact: Hinduism is also a monotheistic religion but no Hindu will believe in One God ever..! Fact: if you believe there's only one God there's an entity who has started the first domino and if you have Ethics Morals and want to Submit to God you're actually a Muslim by definition!!! fact okay theek h baaqi baad me! Wese according to islamic theology Allah has sent messengers to all the nations there's a chance Indians also got any prophet??? I'm not sure who was he or when he existed but Upanishads share a lot in common with Muslims understanding of God. And obviously anyone with brain would accept that we're all design by same entity;;!!! There's no way he could be different and when he is constantly saying in every scripture around the world he's the one a monotheistic God Idk why some weird people believe in Idol worshipping!! Thanks Allah for guiding my grandparents they were Rajput from Jaipur they got converted to islam and my grandpa lost his first wife when he was coming to Karachi in 1947...
Before islamic rule in India, India had 35% of world gdp (highest in the world of that time). During end of islamic rule and inception of british raj, India had 15% of world gdp of that time (highly lost, plundered and destroyed during 600 years of islamic rule, almost 120-150 trillion gbp). After end of british raj and time of independence of India, India's gdp was only a meagre 3% of the world gdp of that time (due to plundering of wealth from India by britishers, almost 50 trillion gbp). So, Islamic rule in India was worst, compared to the british raj.
38:20 Mughals stayed back.. They didn't carry the loot with them back.. Back to where? The Mughals didn't have much to go back to.. Babur had to run away from his homeland.. They were very well off here.. So this argument is faulty.. Comparison with Aryans.. That, recent research has debunked.. It was false propaganda by the British and Europeans to discredit India's ancient superior knowledge..
While visiting the dargah of Mehboob-e Ilahi, Delhi, for paying his homage (The last Mughal ruler, Bahadur Shah “Zafar” (Mughal Emperor Bahadur Shah II) had said: This country (Hind) now belongs to God and He can bestow it on whomever He pleases. For hundreds of years, my ancestors ruled Hindustan through force and fear. Now it is time for others to rule. We will become the ruled and they shall be the rulers. There is no reason to mourn, for we too removed someone from the throne and destroyed their dynasty to establish ours.’ ‘Tears of the Begums: Stories of the Survivors of the Uprising of 1857’ translated by Rana Safvi has been published with permission from Hachette. A Legacy of Blessings: Sri Sri Chandrashekhara Bharathi
Everything is myth only truth is mughals were saint , they expanded their empire through poetry and embracing all cultural, This lady would even say nobody was collecting jaziya tax from non Muslims and akbar did not later removed it because babur and humayun did not have time for religion expansion so they did not have time to put jaziya tax
India’s education ministers were mainly Muslims with a Maulana as the first education minister. Aligarh Muslim University which was the centre of Pakistan movement was turned into a national university by that Maulana education minister in 1955. In our schools we read the history of India as the history of the Mughal India mainly.
Then why did they lose? Akbar fought much fierce battle with Gujarat and bengal sultanate than haldighati. Aurangjeb fought many wars throughout shivaji was not his concern he was 70-89 years old by then
@@Sdgutfbb34566 Did shivaji loose to Aurangazeb or marathas lost to mughals are you day dreaming. Marathas lost to ahmed shah abdali because of rohillas sided with afghans in battle of panipath and rajputs and surajmal not supporting them. But within 10 years what happened to rohillas and mughals read that. Shivaji died at age of 50. Read history properly. Muslims were invaders they burnt our temples and monuments. So please dont say that they settled here.
@@amitsaha9436 aurangjeb was 71 years old when sambhaji was ececuted his son murad was slained and bahadur dhah was a child. Aurangjeb played a crucial role in uniting india at his tenure all state were declaring independence. Heard of safavaid sultanate multiple wars were fought by aurangjeb against them at the time of first riot of shivaji aurangjeb was at afghanistan and shivaji never fought directly with aurangjeb his army was very small he did chappamar yudh that's why aurangjeb called him rat. He will attack and run away. Marathas rose in the late 17 and early 18 century
@@Sdgutfbb34566 Read history Aurangazeeb kingdom was weak and there were numerous rebellions against him by sikhs and rajputs. And about the chapamaar yudh what do the terrioists do now. And shivaji had fought many battles against the mughals and deccan sultanates. As the konkan or marthwada region is hilly terrain and jungle terrain. SO the battles are fought for forts only. Mughals were never liked by anyone in India. They did nothing except destroying temples and looting. What is jaziya please define
@@amitsaha9436 that's what you will know if you read only Maratha sources. Yes jazia was applied on hindus only on those who created more rukus. You have no idea what was happening throughout India and Tibet region. Ofcourse he was trying to unite that's why there were rebellion not just the names you mentioned even from Odisha Madhya Pradesh everywhere but because it was Aurangzeb entire country remained as a country if dara would have been sitting you would have been calling a district size country as india
Dear Host please tell her, the British did not go back on their own, native Bhartiya thrown them out from Bharat, Islamic Invader's rule did not end on its own, native Indians fought them for 1000 years and ended their rule.
@@kashifilyas167 bro when did I say we have the best education system? Oh sorry didn't remember comprehension requires brain processing easily surpassing your 20 IQ. 👍
Mughal empire is depicted same way in India as is Sikh rule in Pakistan. You dont acknowledge achievemnts of Khalsa raj, Ranjeet Singh and Greatest General Hari Singh Nalwa. TLP miscreants often disfigure Ranjit Singh's statue. Even Bhagat Singh is forgotten
Ohh bhai correct ur self. We were never the same. Hindus were always hindus and Muslims were always muslim. In fact Shahjahan was a very religious king. This is a tragedy that because of living together for so long muslims has adopted the hindu culture. It doesn’t mean we were same.
Shajahan was carrying dna of Rajputs through Jodabai, however i always remained admirer of Bappa Rawal, Rana Sanga and Rana Prataap Shimh. They were the true Rajputs,, and not like Manshing who compromised his dignity to Ujbake Akbar by giving his sister in marriage and surrendering entire Ralput dignity.
For your information ,we never consider muslim to our equal, because we have rich history of 10000 years. Even the Arabs don't count u as Muslim's. They call you duplicates. Dare u marry a Arab girl with consent of their parent?,could u dear? 😛.
Mm is forgetting something very basic -- there was an intervening period of almost 60 years after the Mughal rule and the commencement of the Maratha rule.
before muslim invasion India's contribution to world GDP was 33% and it reduced to 25% in 16th century (conclusion India was more prosperous before foreign invasion started with muslim invasion of India)
I’m from India, with great interest I’m watching this broadcast. Today’s historical episode is really interesting. My heartfelt thanks both to you. Looking forward to seeing more broadcasts in the days to come ❤
Story of India and Pakistan is just like two brothers of same clan, one day one of the brother demand his own claim, he got it and family is broken, but almighty God see this, one brother is prosperous rapidly and another destroyed day by day. Hope our Pakistani brother think that aspect that two nation theory is curse on subcontinent and religious intolerance of Jinnah and other fellow made the condition worst. Hope they are more sensitive towards Kashmiri people and feel that there actual cultural value and rich history belong to India. May pak prosperous too, we always pray for wellbeing of subcontinent.
Wow. Excellent description of Mughal Era, Dr. Sahiba. Although 53-minute duration is a testing time of patience for modern audiences. However, for those who are truly interested, listening without interruptions, it a treat. The discussion covered various aspects of life under the Mughal empire, from internal and external policies to religo-political dynamics, socio-economic conditions, agriculture, and infrastructure. It was a surprising fact for me, despite contributing 42% of the GDP, the Mughals were ultimately overthrown by the East India Company besides facing other challenges. I am also surprised that the host did not touch upon the education policy of the Mughal era. Many were eager to hear about this, especially considering criticisms from scholars like Dr. Pervaiz Hoodbhai, who sarcastically, remarked that "while the Mughals were building the Taj Mahal or other monuments, the West was establishing prestigious universities like Oxford and Harvard etc". Also, listening this whole conversation, I guess, one major factor contributing to the decline of the Mughals was the Hindu powers' revolt against the later Mughal dynasties, if so, it definitely shows that the defense system of the Mughals was insufficient. And last but indeed not the least, the legacy of Mughals in shape of monuments, majority of them are in Pakistan, but the revenue generated monuments are part of India. May be we are not good in promotion of tourism sector. :)
🙏🙄👍❤️👌kamal yeh "Mahal, kile, majar"sabhi ban baye "Lakin school, collage, University "nhi jo Hindustan, Pakistan mein the thod diye "Tashasila, Nalanda "
if you see the world's economic history graph, India's GDP contribution to the world economy was the highest until Islamic invasion started and pushed down to 2nd position in 13th century.....
Good to see that you are discussing about "US"... India had rich civilization since ancient times and that is evident in our ancient artifacts itself with a scientific proven context. The Magadh kingdom's navy is considered to be the first recorded navy in the world. India has roots of its ancient culture even outside of India and that is also evident in ancient temples in different part of world. Nalanda University, established in the 5th century CE in modern-day Bihar, India, is considered one of the first residential universities in the world. ++ Well India, Pakistan and Bangladesh has same history. We should not forget our history, however better to focus in present and future. Just keep aside the history for some time which is in ignorance anyway... The sad part is, what we think about each other....! That is important, because this completely reflects in actual minorities living in both Pakistan and Bangladesh. While comparing with India, we have even more Muslim population compare to Pakistan as of now that is called as a minority in India! Please correct your acceptance mindset of actual minorities in your respective countries first before calling out "US". Lets start giving respect to our joint history and unique existence.
Awesome interview ,objective replies, without the jingoism that accompanies in every side of the spectrum, however need to understand how can you whitewash aurangazeb who has left copious documents of his rule onhiw he intends to oppress the kafirs, also their disdain f o local Muslims vis-a-vis the Persian imporrts
Vijaya nagar Empire was ,much richer ,much longer and more powerful than Those chaprasi Moguls ,btw the majority converts are treated as a k8nd of dirt by Muguls and employeed Iranian,Turks or Rajputs
How did the British conquer India? This has been explained in detail in the book "The Anarchy: The Relentless Rise of the East India Company" by William Dalrymple or tune into his Podcast Series “Empire". Both provide an insightful history of a series of events and missteps that caused the takeover of the Indian subcontinent, initially by the East India Company, and later by the Crown. According to Al Jazeera, "Between 1880 to 1920, British colonial policies in India claimed more lives than all famines in the Soviet Union, Maoist China and North Korea combined." According to a study done in the UK by Neelam Tailor, "People of south Asian origin today are between four and six times more likely to get type 2 diabetes than white people. While the role of diet and lifestyle has been explored, it’s only recently that the impact of the disproportionate number of famines under British colonial rule has been uncovered. Neelam Tailor looks into the history of famines during the British Raj and their lasting impact on south Asian genes."
3rd battle of panipath is the band baja and baraat of Martha's by Ahmed shah abdali . He slaughtered half of marathon army And the peshwa died in the court when he heard about Abdali entering the palace
The main cause of the decline of the Durrani dynasty was the loss of thousands of battle hardened troops against the Marathas. there was a great loss of Durrani Empire's military power in the entire struggle. sikh missals took an advantage of loosening Durrani control over Punjab due to weakening of power in the struggle against Marathas, rose into rebellion and eventually united under Ranjit Singh. They captured Amritsar (1802), Ludhiana (1806), Multan, Kashmir, Ladakh, Peshawar, the Khyber Pass and Lahore. 😂😂. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 and other side: visaji pant Beniwal(Maratha)🚩🚩 In February 1772, along with Mahadji Shinde, he overpowered the Rohilkhand at Shukratal by defeating Zabita Khan. He took severe revenge of the defeat of Panipat by breaking the tomb of Najib Khan, by loot*** the artillery and wealth of the Rohillas and by recovering from them an additional tribute of Rs.40 lakhs. In 1772 Marathas capture Delhi again. With this battle they regained their lost supremacy in North India after the Third Battle of Panipat and conquered much of the lost territories which they lost after the Third Battle of Panipat. 🚩🚩🚩
*Economic_growth* I have checked the Economic graph before the Islamic Invasion of bharat and data shows that India's GDP share in the world was approximately 32.7% but after the Mughal Empire ended It remains approximately 15%..... *Cultural_Influence* They have tried enough to demolish Indian native culture famous example was Akbar who uninamously forced Persian language for all the official works... according to famous historian Sita Ram In Mughal Empire more than 40,000/- temples has been demolished....and some of temple destruction is also mention jahangir autobiography "khitab-e-jahagirnam" *Political_administartion* They have forced the Jaziya tax on Indian hindu and made them helpless , Forceful conversation is a normal practice ......Read autobiography of aurangzeb what was his thoughts about Hindus .....Islamic architecture was forced on Hindus
Without any understating of the Mughals, let’s put them in context. The Mughal Empire lasted a mere 331 years (1526-1856). In contrast look at the following: CHOLA EMPIRE: 3rd century BCE - 1279 CE. Influence extended to the present day Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Cambodia, and Thailand. AHOM EMPIRE: 1228 CE - 1826 CE KUSHAN EMPIRE:1st century BCE - 3rd Century BCE. The Mughals, except for brief forays of Aurangazeb, never ventured south of the Vindhyas. The Mughals were but a brief chapter in the long and glorious history of Bharat. It is interesting that Akbar who showed tolerance towards his Hindu subjects doesn’t find a place in Pakistan, where as Aurangzeb, a religious bigot, is a great favorite for naming Pakistani children.
In terms of % share of Global GDP, Indian numbers have been estimated at 32% in 1 CE (with Global population share of 30.03%), at 28% in 1000 CE (Global population share of 27.15%), at 24.35% in 1500 CE (Global population share of 18%), at 22.39 % in 1600 CE (with Global population share of 17.98%) at 24.43% in 1700 CE (Global population share of 27.36%) at 16.04% in 1820 CE (Global population share of 20.06%) at 12.14% in 1870 CE (Global population share of 19.83%). It is clear that right from beginning of 1 CE to 1500 CE the Indian GDP as % share of Global GDP was higher than corresponding % share of Global population and started declining thereafter- incidentally as Mughals came in (1526 CE onwards). Mughals can not claim having brought prosperity to India which was already prosperous enough to attract Mughals (and others) to invade it. (source of data is article "Economic history of India" on Wikipedia) More than GDP it was stoppage of enlightenment whereby Indian contribution to STEM subjects declined and dwindled during Mughal rule (as is the case worldwide post 13th Century / Post Al Gazali era in Islam's history) only to recover with modern English education in post industrial revolution time.
Company's tactical moves plus development of science n technology and divisions and enmities among the indigenous rulers proved to be decisive! factors
Brother, your work is the best and the finest among other famous channels. But i encouraging you to also make content of awareness related current war strategy. This will help our people to realise the real fact and situation we are facing now. In the hope we understand that protecting Pakistan is very important in every aspect, socially, mentally and economically.
all these protection businesses need huge amount of money which you don't have you are already collapsed people are fleeing scarcity of basic needs of life like food items medicines sky rocketing electricity and gas bills no industrial infrastructures no skilled manpower declining exports pathetic educational standard all these are pointers of a failed country with very uncertain future
Let us recall India contributed over 35 percent to world GDP before Muslims came. Muslims impoverished majority Hindus by collecting disproportionate taxes and building expensive useless maqbara etc.
The Mughals aren’t portrayed in bad light altogether in India. Akbar, Humayun, Jahangir, Shah Jahan and Bahadur Shah Zafar are much celebrated rulers in India. It is only Aurangzeb’s rule marked by extreme religious persecution of Hindus and Sikhs that creates resentment for Mughal rule among certain sections of Indians.
इकॉनमी में मुग़लों का कोई योगदान नहीं था इंडिया हमेशा से अमीर और समृद्ध था l मुग़ल तो ख़ुद ग़रीबी और भुखमरी की वजह से यहाँ आए थे l वो तो एक फूटी कोढ़ी भी नहीं लाए थे l यहाँ खेती,हस्तशिल्प,इंडस्ट्री पहले से था l मुग़लों के समय कोई भी वैज्ञानिक प्रगति नहीं हुई l
@@sirat-al-mustaqimbyshahabs1418 कभी नहीं भारत में व्यापार,हस्तशिल्प ,खेती हमेशा से अच्छे थे l देश हमेशा से समृद्ध था l मुर्दा लोगों के मक़बरे बनवाना कोई आर्किटेक्चर में योगदान हैं l भारत की दौलत देखकर ऐयाशी में डूब गये l उस समय शिक्षा,चिकित्सा,विज्ञान और तकनीक में कोई काम नहीं हुआ l पहले से बने मंदिरों,गुरुकुलों,मठों का नाश कर दिया l
Madam ko ye batana chahiye ki muslims economically aur socially kya add kiye? Jab invaders the fir addition kaise kar sakte hain😂 Jab Europe dark age se nikal kar scientific advancement ke towards move kar rha tha during 14th and 15th centuries tab ye so called Muslim rulers kar kya rahe the? Kya unhone waise institutions develop ki?
Basically, Ahmed Shah Abdali's ambitions in North West and North Indian Sub continent gave the British or the East India Company the breakthrough to establish a 'Raaj'. British beat the Marathas and the Sikhs, two major Non Muslim Powers and the Mysorean Mercenary Rulers Hyder Ali and Tipu at their own game and became the sole Sovereigns in the Indian Sub Continent.
Bari alig' company ki hukumat is an important book on arrival of Europeans and rise of British India company and then it's cruelty inflicted on the Indians.
mughal empire or british empire ke bich me maratha empire ne 144 (1674-1818) years raj kiya tha india me.. britishers khud kehte the ki hunme bharat ko marathose lia hai mughalonse se nahi...lagta hai bich me ki history pakistan me padhate nahi hai
Historical events are covered only after taking a hefty dose of steroid. The Arab invasion of Sind is covered flippantly. In fact, it's a prologue to hundreds of invasions that were to follow. In a book "Among the Believers', the writer Naipaul covers this selective killings of a warrior class and export of men and women used as bounty in Arab lands. The burden of history is too heavy. Both the host and the guest are not equipped to carry this load. Impossible to sit through this video. Exist, please.
First of all check the history the british didnt take over from mughal , they take over from marata empire and mind u im not even a marathi but that is the truth if u reserch u will find it easily only if u want to serch truly
There is nothing so called mughal architecture in India these all bulidings are Indian native origin tajmahal have 14 room inside it but not a single shrine and tomb have room inside it but tajmahal have all of it so tajmahal is not islamic structure
@@zaroonaz 😁 where mugal came from? Why no tajmahal like structure outside India jaahil? Mugal name given by briths also first Mughal king Akbar himself a kaafir he made own religion din e elai. Mughal word came from Mongolia they look like Chinese but Pakistani connect themselves with Saudi and turks 😂
agar mughal doosare religions ke sath fair treatment karte the to mughals ne 30000+ Hindu aur Jain temples ko kyo toda tha aur Shri Guru Gobind Singh ji ke Shahibzado ko kyo maara tha?
![KAYTRANADA - Witchy (feat. Childish Gambino) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/jGK3YVmGZ3Y/mqdefault.jpg)
We were colonized by foreigners for a 1000 years. Finally, we have Swaraj
Try to remove the narrow religious extremist prejudice from your brain & only then you would understand what do the words "colonisation" and "settlement" mean.
Pakka anghbhkt aya from cow belt jahil Hindi states
@@ghazanfardar1630cultural subjugation is the worst kind as it destroys the social fabric of a civilisation- see what happened in Mesopotamia, Persia and Egypt - language, religion, society and its people all destroyed.
Mughals were invaders, some of them decided to settle down and pushed their culture and religion but people pushed back and that’s the reason Bharat/ India is still strong and will continue to gain strength of a super power (its natural state) and there is nothing invaders can do about it!
@@GSR356 The Muslim rule of India did not begin with the Mughal Empire. A strong Indo-Muslim society based on pluralism and tolerance had already evolved after the Arabs rule of Sindh & with the establishment of Delhi Sultanate. India survived and progressed due to successful fusion of various cultures, religions and languages. Today, you are telling us that India would become a superpower very soon. Had you had any knowledge of history, you would have known that India's GDP was 27% of the world GDP under the Mughal Empire which at that time was more than the GDP of China and America. India's industrial production was 25% of the global industrial production. During the Delhi Sultanate, some historians' estimate is that India's GDP was around 40% of the world GDP. India was the largest economy & military power of the world during the reign of Delhi Sultanate and the Mughal rule.
You can only understand this if you read the history and come out of your low narrow thinking of a religious extremist & prejudiced mindset.
Hindus and Muslims had lived peacefully and intermixed even to the extent of interfaith marriages in a secular tolerant society. It was only after the end of Mughal Empire that the Indian society degenerated and religious bigots like you propped up & made the Indian society a hostage of religious extremism. Better come out of it and open your eyes to the reality and historic truths.
Wow such a slave nation were you sanatan dharmis. Generations of slaves.😂😂😂
The Khalsa flag over Lahore and Peshawar. The Maratha flag over Delhi. Hindavi Swaraj.
Murakh, Khalsa were not fighting for any concept of India let alone Bharat, they were fighting for there own Punjabi Sikhs.
@@rizwanhussain645No 1, he was talking about the expanse of the empire. Secondly, Hindavi swaraj is a maratha slogan
@@rizwanhussain645At least they were not Arabs or Turks or Mongols. They were Indic
@AdityaKumar-rj2uf They were representing the Sindhu lands not Ganga dwellers nor Deccans.Regards
Maratha were beaten badly by Afghans
muslim conquest of India "probably the bloodiest story in history"
Will Durant (historian)
True
And yet many Hindus got convert to Islam..! With will...!!! My great grandfather was one of them...! Love from Pakistan... My grandpa came here from Jaipur. He was a Rajput converted Muslim!
@@khushboo0786that "will" is just a garb to not feel embarrassed. Neither you have any proof that it was a choice nor i can prove that it was forced in ur particular case...but the Islamic rulers have categorically mentioned in their biographies that they used to forcefully convert ppl as a religious duty .
Nobody can live with the fact that they were forced to join a religion so they tell their descendents that this was a choice...I know you gonna come back and argue this but that's a fact
@@khushboo0786 most of the muslim rulers in their biography proudly say how they killed, humiliated or forcefully converted Kafirs so you know.......when today's taliban, alqaeda, ISIS, boko haram etc. in present modern day is this fanatic just imagine how they would be in the radical medical period....
@@ranand089 Muslims have never been like this That's why many people have accepted Islam..!
Zheng hi went to Indonesia they became Muslims, Indian Muslims and Pakistani Muslims were formerly Hindus but they chose islam..! You can say it was force but if Muslims actually had to force anyone You won't find Hindus anymore they stayed there for very long time everyone would have become a Muslim until now...
They Muslims Stayed in Spain and whoever got converted went to Morocco or other countries after European reconquest the land..!
Muslims haven't converted people forcefully... It has never happened in history...
You can say that about Christianity it's their history where a Native American said if there are people like you in heaven I'd love to go to hell..!
When they were killing and tried to convert them..!
Indonesia Malaysia they're prime Example of being a good Muslim and even in South India most influence in not of Mughals or other so called invaders ... In south Indian region islam was not brought by any invader but by a Man Ubaidullah in 661CE... Through Lakshdeep and Malabar coast ...
Way before BinQasim that's why South Indian Muslims are more pure Muslims...!
I am sure about Muslims never did any violence except for Ummayad empire Bin Qasim and Hijaaj were also from that empire and They're the Same empire who killed kind of the Holy prophet..!
How can you call them Muslims??? Only by their names???
I also don't like Hijaaj bin yousuf or Bin Qasim.. I'm Sindhi and Raja Zaahir was my hero not because of his religion but bcz he was following everything just like the teaching of Islam..!
On the other hand there were Ummayad who have killed Imaam Hasan and Imaam Husain and their families!!! 😓😥😥😥😓😥😓
Many Indians associate islam with invasion but way before that Ubaidullah have sent the message of Islam and Many South Indian Muslims became Muslims not by force or anything and there's a verse in Quran that says.. : *There's no compulsion in religion***
So there's no way a Muslim Man would force anyone to become the part of Ummah...!
There's also another example Param Singh also became Yazdan sheikh... Not by force and there are many stories of people converting to islam by themselves...
Islam has been doing administration of people but they never converted anyone specially by force!!
Pakistan me 1630 se 1850 180 saal ki history nahi padhate hai
Maratha Empire destroy Mughal Empire
Maratha Empire rule whole subcontinent
U r 100% right brother❤
Can you give example of one major battle won by maratha plzzzz.May be panipat
Please read history
Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj
Sambaji, Santaji ghorpade, bajirao Peshwa,
@@anandagro314 who cares bro?? It was kingdom and Conquer system till British period, now we are living under democracy nationalist system.
Mughal empire ,Aurangzeb shifted last 27 year of his life to Conquer Deccan and he died in 1707 .Battle of Panipat in year 1761 Maratha lost and after that Punjab Pakistan and Kashmir was under Sikh empire till 1851
Read about why marriages happen in the middle of night, read about Sikhism, jazia etc. why not just accept the truth?
Sikh indeed helped shah alam...against Marathas...hearing Sikhs are coming Marathas tan away from Delhi when shah alam sister asked for Sikh sardars to intervene...Britishers even changed their plan to capture Delhi..hearing Sikhs are there...pata nahi history ke important points miss karte hai ye log...Arte madam g ...kitaabe aur bhi hai ...yaa RUclips oehe search kar lo...nahi to QAZI NOOR MOHAMMAD Jo ke abdali kee Saath aaya thaa..usne Sikh sardaro ke baate me Kya likha USS wawt...jab abdali aur sikho ke jungg chall Rahi thee...Apne QAZI ko he par lo...
If you are historian than read the books of that time of aurangzeb how he destroyed hindu temples by sending force
Mugals not shown in bad light in Indian books. You should focus on improving your your own books. Religious extremism is killing you.
religious extremism is killing the whole of the subcontinent
👌🏼👍🏼🇮🇳
👍🏼👌🏼🇮🇳
That wealth was not exported from India during and before Mughal rule is not correct. Wars of Central Asia and Persia and MughAls were funded by the raids and plunder of this land. Even the wars between the British Empire and Napoleon were funded by Indian wealth. Infact one main aim of EIC was to ensure the French did not succeeed in raising funds from India, which had a telling impact on the wars in Europe
You are trying to argue from a position of ignorance and lack of knowledge of history. Use your mind & read some history to become educated on such matters.
@@ghazanfardar1630 bhaisahab aapke lafzo me ek bhi counter facts kam aur bakwas jyada dikh raha hai upar jo mahoday ne bola uske saboot upasthit hai ek ggl searches pe aap counter facts present kar sakte hai ki mughals wealth extract nai karte the
Total eyewash 😢 I wish she showed little honesty. When you mention Audrey Truschke, we already know where you're coming from.
Too bad she didn't parroted hindutva version of 'history'. You need to watch Syed Muzzamil types for that😂.
@coocoo-pe7ywMore like coping mechanism for hindutvadis on getting ruled by Muslims for a 1000 years😂.
@@Sobanhassan1761 No. You just need to read primary sources which are available in digital libraries of many reputed Universities. And avoid reading history sponsored by the radical left.
@@Sobanhassan1761 Muzammil is not a historian. He is a journalist. The speaker should quote from primary sources and avoid storytellers like Trushcke. She should use Afif, Kalhans, Barani and Badayuni.
14:34 well one thing is for sure, throughout the the Sultanat and subsequent Mughal rule, there's not one Indian innovator/discoverer/scientist whose name comes forward in influencing the global narrative. Most of the innovation and discovery space os captured by westerners during this period. In contrast, preislamic india is full of such examples of pioneers in science
You seem to be a highly prejudiced religious extremist who has closed his mind and eyes to the realities and history. During the Mughal rule, India's industrial production was 25% of the world. The British colonisers carried out de-industrialization of India. Better open you mind & read some books to gain adequate knowledge of history.
Ofcourse as you never taught about islamic golden age ohh sorry all innovations done by Hindus why not you do now atleast you have a 1.4 billion useless population
17:15 its not fairness its just their compulsion to treat hindus little better than prior muslim dynasty because they don't want to lost power when aurangzeb tried you know what happened
Satnami revolt
jat revolt
Silh revolt maratha revolt
rajput rebellion
Bundelkhand rise
bengal bhusna revolt
Himachal bilaspur revolt
And lastly the marathas who force him to died in deccan
Central Asia se mogul aaye to central asia me konsa aisa architectural structure hai jo mughalo ne waha se laya? Dikhta no nahi. To Taj mahal indian architect se he banaya huva hona chaahiye
Bhai central asia me kaun kaun si countries thi?
Uzbekistan k videos dkho tb pta chlga
Taj mahal is a Combination of Central Asian , Persian and indian styles .
@@narayandutt_7
Uzbekistan kazakistan turkministan Azerbaijan Tajakistan
@@DrStrange234 Ha to bhai jab waha itni sammruddhi thi toh yaha kya karne aaye they??? 😅
Ek example dedo na west of Afghanistan K Mughlo ne pehle ye banaya tha Farhana main aur fir yaha aa k uska replica banaya...
Secondary thing is Persion Architect main Mughalo ka koi bhi yogdan nahi tha..q ki jo Persian architectural design famous Hui wo sab Cyrus, Darius etc. k time and usse pehle ki thi...
Tisri baat yaha aake Jo 2-4 cheeze banayi jaise ki Taj Mahal toh bhai banane k liye paise aur resources kaha se aaya??
Lol kuch bolte ho to logic to rakkho yar...
Central Asia mein Kaun sa sea hai jisme mughals boat building Kar rahe they
Mugals are not portrayed so bad in India ..if u read books of Indian history they are all praise of Mughals..India ke bare me perception bannana chodiye
They are potraied bad in social media. They are mentioned only in ncert no state board student reads about them
According to European archives Mughals killed more Indians/Hindus than Hitler, Stalin, Pol pot and Mao Zedong combined.....Period from Taimur to Aurangzeb was the bloodiest period in human history.
@@ashishbhatt6874 famous American historian will Durant ne bhi kaha hai
@@vimdhayakjigulambipurwale4536 But Leftist historian romila thaapar who wrote our textbooks thinks Aurangzeb & taimur are the epitome of secularism
Mughals destroyed Nalanda and Vikramshila universities while British established Calcutta,, Mombay, Madras... Universities. Mughhals established Harams while Britsh brought railway network throughout India. Mughals destroyed temples, imosed Zazia on Hinudus while British did not destroy any mosque or temples, every one free to follow ones religion.....
Fact. Mughals did not rule India. The rule parts. Bits and pieces.
Fact. The majority of Muslims in India TODAY have no relation to the Mughuls. Almost all of them converted to Islam with the sword at their throats.
Fact. The Mughuls had no great cultural gravitas. But as they had a Moslem “empire “ in India, they adopted Persian (Iran) culture and language. This suggests they were invading barbarians.
Fact. The Hindu Marathas ruled India for 100 years between Mughuls and East India Company eventually Britain.
Fact. There was never a Pakistan. Pakistan came into being in 1947.
@@vijaynair6161 Fact...
Fact1: Muslims came to India way before Bin Qasim and Many people from South Indian origins came to islam willingly but no Indian will talk about it..!
Fact2: Islam has ruled Spain but never converted anyone forcefully.. Because Quran says **There's no compulsion in religion***
Fact Islam has never Ruled Indonesia or Malaysia they were Hindus and idol worshippers but when Zheng he a Chinese Muslim trader went there they liked the idea of Islam and accepted it willingly and today Indonesia is highest populated Muslim country!
Fact: Bin Qasim and Hijaaj etc were from Ummayad whom Indians hate and legal them as Muslims but they are the same people who killed the kins of the Holy prophet!
Fact: Hinduism is also a monotheistic religion but no Hindu will believe in One God ever..!
Fact: if you believe there's only one God there's an entity who has started the first domino and if you have Ethics Morals and want to Submit to God you're actually a Muslim by definition!!!
fact okay theek h baaqi baad me!
Wese according to islamic theology Allah has sent messengers to all the nations there's a chance Indians also got any prophet??? I'm not sure who was he or when he existed but Upanishads share a lot in common with Muslims understanding of God. And obviously anyone with brain would accept that we're all design by same entity;;!!!
There's no way he could be different and when he is constantly saying in every scripture around the world he's the one a monotheistic God Idk why some weird people believe in Idol worshipping!!
Thanks Allah for guiding my grandparents they were Rajput from Jaipur they got converted to islam and my grandpa lost his first wife when he was coming to Karachi in 1947...
Before islamic rule in India, India had 35% of world gdp (highest in the world of that time).
During end of islamic rule and inception of british raj, India had 15% of world gdp of that time (highly lost, plundered and destroyed during 600 years of islamic rule, almost 120-150 trillion gbp).
After end of british raj and time of independence of India, India's gdp was only a meagre 3% of the world gdp of that time (due to plundering of wealth from India by britishers, almost 50 trillion gbp).
So, Islamic rule in India was worst, compared to the british raj.
Mazhab impose nhi kra toh North India mein saare temples kisne tode ?....
Don't cry 😂
@@AliMozafari-wm9zw only people crying are your Palestinians mussalis.... I can hear them sitting in Delhi 😂😂😂....
Aa gaya typical north indian anghbhkt mentality
@@AliMozafari-wm9zwGo Israel 😂😂😂
@@DspSaurabhSinha I am Mughals, Hindus Jeja jee 😘
38:20 Mughals stayed back.. They didn't carry the loot with them back.. Back to where? The Mughals didn't have much to go back to.. Babur had to run away from his homeland.. They were very well off here.. So this argument is faulty.. Comparison with Aryans.. That, recent research has debunked.. It was false propaganda by the British and Europeans to discredit India's ancient superior knowledge..
Don't you know that Aurangzeb destroyed so many Hindu temples in Mathura etc. was it political or was it for religious supremacy
They will never accept this brother.
While visiting the dargah of Mehboob-e Ilahi, Delhi, for paying his homage (The last Mughal ruler, Bahadur Shah “Zafar” (Mughal Emperor Bahadur Shah II) had said:
This country (Hind) now belongs to God and He can bestow it on whomever He pleases. For hundreds of years, my ancestors ruled Hindustan through force and fear. Now it is time for others to rule. We will become the ruled and they shall be the rulers. There is no reason to mourn, for we too removed someone from the throne and destroyed their dynasty to establish ours.’
‘Tears of the Begums: Stories of the Survivors of the Uprising of 1857’ translated by Rana Safvi has been published with permission from Hachette.
A Legacy of Blessings: Sri Sri Chandrashekhara Bharathi
Everything is myth only truth is mughals were saint , they expanded their empire through poetry and embracing all cultural, This lady would even say nobody was collecting jaziya tax from non Muslims and akbar did not later removed it because babur and humayun did not have time for religion expansion so they did not have time to put jaziya tax
I don't understand why you are lying. Don't you know that Aurangzeb imposed Jizya which was a tax for being a Hindu
India’s education ministers were mainly Muslims with a Maulana as the first education minister. Aligarh Muslim University which was the centre of Pakistan movement was turned into a national university by that Maulana education minister in 1955. In our schools we read the history of India as the history of the Mughal India mainly.
If mughal are rich than why they came to India? Why no such tajmahal like structure outside India or any islamic nations?
Don't you know how Aurangzeb killed his brother Dara Shikoh and cut off his head and sent it to his father Shah Jahan
Maharana pratap and Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj are father of mughals
Then why did they lose? Akbar fought much fierce battle with Gujarat and bengal sultanate than haldighati. Aurangjeb fought many wars throughout shivaji was not his concern he was 70-89 years old by then
@@Sdgutfbb34566 Did shivaji loose to Aurangazeb or marathas lost to mughals are you day dreaming. Marathas lost to ahmed shah abdali because of rohillas sided with afghans in battle of panipath and rajputs and surajmal not supporting them. But within 10 years what happened to rohillas and mughals read that. Shivaji died at age of 50. Read history properly. Muslims were invaders they burnt our temples and monuments. So please dont say that they settled here.
@@amitsaha9436 aurangjeb was 71 years old when sambhaji was ececuted his son murad was slained and bahadur dhah was a child. Aurangjeb played a crucial role in uniting india at his tenure all state were declaring independence. Heard of safavaid sultanate multiple wars were fought by aurangjeb against them at the time of first riot of shivaji aurangjeb was at afghanistan and shivaji never fought directly with aurangjeb his army was very small he did chappamar yudh that's why aurangjeb called him rat. He will attack and run away. Marathas rose in the late 17 and early 18 century
@@Sdgutfbb34566 Read history Aurangazeeb kingdom was weak and there were numerous rebellions against him by sikhs and rajputs. And about the chapamaar yudh what do the terrioists do now. And shivaji had fought many battles against the mughals and deccan sultanates. As the konkan or marthwada region is hilly terrain and jungle terrain. SO the battles are fought for forts only. Mughals were never liked by anyone in India. They did nothing except destroying temples and looting. What is jaziya please define
@@amitsaha9436 that's what you will know if you read only Maratha sources. Yes jazia was applied on hindus only on those who created more rukus. You have no idea what was happening throughout India and Tibet region. Ofcourse he was trying to unite that's why there were rebellion not just the names you mentioned even from Odisha Madhya Pradesh everywhere but because it was Aurangzeb entire country remained as a country if dara would have been sitting you would have been calling a district size country as india
Dear Host please tell her, the British did not go back on their own, native Bhartiya thrown them out from Bharat, Islamic Invader's rule did not end on its own, native Indians fought them for 1000 years and ended their rule.
Allauddin khilji must visit Pakistan to recover their economy. It is possible
Maharana pratap and chatrapati shivaji maharaj official father of Mughal 😎💪😈
ohh thats why mughals always top on them they work for mughals 😅
@@GamingAndTech522pakistan ka haal dekh 25 baat IMF jaa keh silver jubilee mana
Not in images.. But in reality both rajputs and marathas were under Mughal 🎉
@@Tausif1-9-9-6Lol whole lineage of Bappa Rawal (founder of Rawalpindi) kept Mughals on toes.
@@Tausif1-9-9-6you haven't even studied maratha empire.
ignorance is bliss. 🤟
5:29 neither the host nor the guest know what happened between aurangzeb and british rule 💀💀💀
Long live pakistani education system 👍
Ok u will tell us born from most iconic education system country of poor
@@kashifilyas167 bro when did I say we have the best education system?
Oh sorry didn't remember comprehension requires brain processing easily surpassing your 20 IQ. 👍
Mughal empire is depicted same way in India as is Sikh rule in Pakistan. You dont acknowledge achievemnts of Khalsa raj, Ranjeet Singh and Greatest General Hari Singh Nalwa. TLP miscreants often disfigure Ranjit Singh's statue. Even Bhagat Singh is forgotten
Hahaha brainwash Indian 😂😂Lol ranjit singh Singh never conquered whole Pakistan he captured Punjab and Kashmir and Peshawar Pakistan only
KSHATRIYE HAI HUM
KABHI TUMHARE BAAP DADA SE PUCH LENA
✊👊
Buddhist civilization 😅 hindu name lene mai fatti hai
Even Buddha 9 avatar of lord Vishnu
Buddhist civilization!!!!😂😂😂😂😂
Ohh bhai correct ur self. We were never the same. Hindus were always hindus and Muslims were always muslim. In fact Shahjahan was a very religious king. This is a tragedy that because of living together for so long muslims has adopted the hindu culture. It doesn’t mean we were same.
Shajahan was carrying dna of Rajputs through Jodabai, however i always remained admirer of Bappa Rawal, Rana Sanga and Rana Prataap Shimh. They were the true Rajputs,, and not like Manshing who compromised his dignity to Ujbake Akbar by giving his sister in marriage and surrendering entire Ralput dignity.
@@kishoreshanbhag4535hahaha brainwash Indian bakht spotted 😂😂fake history 😂😂😂
@@kishoreshanbhag4535hahaha brainwash Indian fake history 😂😂😂
@@shahanarif4295 what is ur qualification dear?, what is the definition of brainwash, Abdul? 🤑.
For your information ,we never consider muslim to our equal, because we have rich history of 10000 years. Even the Arabs don't count u as Muslim's. They call you duplicates. Dare u marry a Arab girl with consent of their parent?,could u dear? 😛.
India's peasantry is destroyed by the Mughal, read Irfan Habib's "The Agrarian system of mughal india". Mughals destroyed india.
Mm is forgetting something very basic -- there was an intervening period of almost 60 years after the Mughal rule and the commencement of the Maratha rule.
Pakistani kuch bhi bolte hai 😂😂 inke heros ki waja se Inka ye haal hai
Moghuls like many other Islamic powers invaded India, and so they were marauders!! That was bad enough for the Indians.
before muslim invasion India's contribution to world GDP was 33% and it reduced to 25% in 16th century
(conclusion India was more prosperous before foreign invasion started with muslim invasion of India)
I’m from India, with great interest I’m watching this broadcast. Today’s historical episode is really interesting. My heartfelt thanks both to you. Looking forward to seeing more broadcasts in the days to come ❤
It's an irony that hyder Ali tipu sultan are totally forgotten in east India companies history
Story of India and Pakistan is just like two brothers of same clan, one day one of the brother demand his own claim, he got it and family is broken, but almighty God see this, one brother is prosperous rapidly and another destroyed day by day.
Hope our Pakistani brother think that aspect that two nation theory is curse on subcontinent and religious intolerance of Jinnah and other fellow made the condition worst.
Hope they are more sensitive towards Kashmiri people and feel that there actual cultural value and rich history belong to India.
May pak prosperous too, we always pray for wellbeing of subcontinent.
The muhhamdan conquest of India is probably the bloodiest history of the world - Will Durant
Neraj Rai Indian Genetics expert. You must listen to him on his studies on Aryan invasion myth.
Wow. Excellent description of Mughal Era, Dr. Sahiba. Although 53-minute duration is a testing time of patience for modern audiences. However, for those who are truly interested, listening without interruptions, it a treat. The discussion covered various aspects of life under the Mughal empire, from internal and external policies to religo-political dynamics, socio-economic conditions, agriculture, and infrastructure. It was a surprising fact for me, despite contributing 42% of the GDP, the Mughals were ultimately overthrown by the East India Company besides facing other challenges.
I am also surprised that the host did not touch upon the education policy of the Mughal era. Many were eager to hear about this, especially considering criticisms from scholars like Dr. Pervaiz Hoodbhai, who sarcastically, remarked that "while the Mughals were building the Taj Mahal or other monuments, the West was establishing prestigious universities like Oxford and Harvard etc".
Also, listening this whole conversation, I guess, one major factor contributing to the decline of the Mughals was the Hindu powers' revolt against the later Mughal dynasties, if so, it definitely shows that the defense system of the Mughals was insufficient. And last but indeed not the least, the legacy of Mughals in shape of monuments, majority of them are in Pakistan, but the revenue generated monuments are part of India. May be we are not good in promotion of tourism sector. :)
🙏🙄👍❤️👌kamal yeh "Mahal, kile, majar"sabhi ban baye "Lakin school, collage, University "nhi jo Hindustan, Pakistan mein the thod diye "Tashasila, Nalanda "
if you see the world's economic history graph, India's GDP contribution to the world economy was the highest until Islamic invasion started and pushed down to 2nd position in 13th century.....
This lady is an extraordinary person who was setting out the facts as they are.
Good to see that you are discussing about "US"... India had rich civilization since ancient times and that is evident in our ancient artifacts itself with a scientific proven context. The Magadh kingdom's navy is considered to be the first recorded navy in the world. India has roots of its ancient culture even outside of India and that is also evident in ancient temples in different part of world. Nalanda University, established in the 5th century CE in modern-day Bihar, India, is considered one of the first residential universities in the world. ++ Well India, Pakistan and Bangladesh has same history. We should not forget our history, however better to focus in present and future.
Just keep aside the history for some time which is in ignorance anyway... The sad part is, what we think about each other....! That is important, because this completely reflects in actual minorities living in both Pakistan and Bangladesh. While comparing with India, we have even more Muslim population compare to Pakistan as of now that is called as a minority in India! Please correct your acceptance mindset of actual minorities in your respective countries first before calling out "US". Lets start giving respect to our joint history and unique existence.
Awesome interview ,objective replies, without the jingoism that accompanies in every side of the spectrum, however need to understand how can you whitewash aurangazeb who has left copious documents of his rule onhiw he intends to oppress the kafirs, also their disdain f o local Muslims vis-a-vis the Persian imporrts
Vijaya nagar Empire was ,much richer ,much longer and more powerful than Those chaprasi Moguls ,btw the majority converts are treated as a k8nd of dirt by Muguls and employeed Iranian,Turks or Rajputs
How did the British conquer India?
This has been explained in detail in the book "The Anarchy: The Relentless Rise of the East India Company" by William Dalrymple or tune into his Podcast Series “Empire". Both provide an insightful history of a series of events and missteps that caused the takeover of the Indian subcontinent, initially by the East India Company, and later by the Crown.
According to Al Jazeera, "Between 1880 to 1920, British colonial policies in India claimed more lives than all famines in the Soviet Union, Maoist China and North Korea combined."
According to a study done in the UK by Neelam Tailor, "People of south Asian origin today are between four and six times more likely to get type 2 diabetes than white people. While the role of diet and lifestyle has been explored, it’s only recently that the impact of the disproportionate number of famines under British colonial rule has been uncovered. Neelam Tailor looks into the history of famines during the British Raj and their lasting impact on south Asian genes."
فیصل کے بعد آپ کا پروگرام بہت خوب ہوتا ہے
3rd battle of panipath is the band baja and baraat of Martha's by Ahmed shah abdali .
He slaughtered half of marathon army
And the peshwa died in the court when he heard about Abdali entering the palace
The main cause of the decline of the Durrani dynasty was the loss of thousands of battle hardened troops against the Marathas. there was a great loss of Durrani Empire's military power in the entire struggle. sikh missals took an advantage of loosening Durrani control over Punjab due to weakening of power in the struggle against Marathas, rose into rebellion and eventually united under Ranjit Singh. They captured Amritsar (1802), Ludhiana (1806), Multan, Kashmir, Ladakh, Peshawar, the Khyber Pass and Lahore. 😂😂.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
and other side: visaji pant Beniwal(Maratha)🚩🚩
In February 1772, along with Mahadji Shinde, he overpowered the Rohilkhand at Shukratal by defeating Zabita Khan. He took severe revenge of the defeat of Panipat by breaking the tomb of Najib Khan, by loot*** the artillery and wealth of the Rohillas and by recovering from them an additional tribute of Rs.40 lakhs.
In 1772 Marathas capture Delhi again. With this battle they regained their lost supremacy in North India after the Third Battle of Panipat and conquered much of the lost territories which they lost after the Third Battle of Panipat. 🚩🚩🚩
What about Guru Tegh Bahadur and Guru Gobind Singh ji's sons?
*Economic_growth* I have checked the Economic graph before the Islamic Invasion of bharat and data shows that India's GDP share in the world was approximately 32.7% but after the Mughal Empire ended It remains approximately 15%.....
*Cultural_Influence* They have tried enough to demolish Indian native culture famous example was Akbar who uninamously forced Persian language for all the official works... according to famous historian Sita Ram In Mughal Empire more than 40,000/- temples has been demolished....and some of temple destruction is also mention jahangir autobiography "khitab-e-jahagirnam"
*Political_administartion* They have forced the Jaziya tax on Indian hindu and made them helpless , Forceful conversation is a normal practice ......Read autobiography of aurangzeb what was his thoughts about Hindus .....Islamic architecture was forced on Hindus
Have you read middle school NCERT books from India Dr. Fouzia?
Without any understating of the Mughals, let’s put them in context. The Mughal Empire lasted a mere 331 years (1526-1856). In contrast look at the following:
CHOLA EMPIRE: 3rd century BCE - 1279 CE. Influence extended to the present day Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Cambodia, and Thailand.
AHOM EMPIRE: 1228 CE - 1826 CE
KUSHAN EMPIRE:1st century BCE - 3rd Century BCE.
The Mughals, except for brief forays of Aurangazeb, never ventured south of the Vindhyas. The Mughals were but a brief chapter in the long and glorious history of Bharat. It is interesting that Akbar who showed tolerance towards his Hindu subjects doesn’t find a place in Pakistan, where as Aurangzeb, a religious bigot, is a great favorite for naming Pakistani children.
Very knowledgeable. It is important to rise beyond petty hatreds and focus on facts. Hats off.
She does not analyse. She speaks in general terms. Her history is like patch work quilt. Still her presentation is is good.
Dr Fauzia episode is quite Lucid and enlightening for us , Congratulations
In terms of % share of Global GDP, Indian numbers have been estimated at 32% in 1 CE (with Global population share of 30.03%), at 28% in 1000 CE (Global population share of 27.15%), at 24.35% in 1500 CE (Global population share of 18%), at 22.39 % in 1600 CE (with Global population share of 17.98%) at 24.43% in 1700 CE (Global population share of 27.36%) at 16.04% in 1820 CE (Global population share of 20.06%) at 12.14% in 1870 CE (Global population share of 19.83%). It is clear that right from beginning of 1 CE to 1500 CE the Indian GDP as % share of Global GDP was higher than corresponding % share of Global population and started declining thereafter- incidentally as Mughals came in (1526 CE onwards). Mughals can not claim having brought prosperity to India which was already prosperous enough to attract Mughals (and others) to invade it.
(source of data is article "Economic history of India" on Wikipedia)
More than GDP it was stoppage of enlightenment whereby Indian contribution to STEM subjects declined and dwindled during Mughal rule (as is the case worldwide post 13th Century / Post Al Gazali era in Islam's history) only to recover with modern English education in post industrial revolution time.
38:35 you mention that Abdali was an invader and a looter
Then why pakistan named it's missile after Abdali ?
Company's tactical moves plus development of science n technology and divisions and enmities among the indigenous rulers proved to be decisive! factors
Great discussion
Interesting and informative. Loved it.
Talk about current problems, challenges and their possible solutions.
Indians❤❤
Maratha Empire + Sikh Empire + Ahoms = Downfall of Mughals
Brother, your work is the best and the finest among other famous channels. But i encouraging you to also make content of awareness related current war strategy. This will help our people to realise the real fact and situation we are facing now. In the hope we understand that protecting Pakistan is very important in every aspect, socially, mentally and economically.
🙏🙏
all these protection businesses need huge amount of money which you don't have you are already collapsed people are fleeing scarcity of basic needs of life like food items medicines sky rocketing electricity and gas bills no industrial infrastructures no skilled manpower declining exports pathetic educational standard all these are pointers of a failed country with very uncertain future
Dr Fouzia Farooq has great insight into South Asian History. Absolutely amazing and equally facsinating.
Short knowledge of 1000 years. We have trees more older than Islam
Don't be ashamed to call it Indian subcontinent not South Asia
Maddam you are the Great❤ best documentary i have ever seen.
Very informative n dr fouzia explained very well.I wish we could hv more such podcast s
🙏
Beautiful conversation dr.fouzia ❤❤❤
Knowledge like school girl 😂😂
Aurangzeb's 25 years war with Marathas started decline of the Mughal Empire. After Aurangzeb, Marathas became power.
google maratha empire map.. attock se cuttack or peshawar se lekar tanjaur tak maratha empire ka map dikhega..
very informative..Dr. Fouzia and the host, thanks a lot for making such a supperb podcast.
🙏🙏
تحقیق چشتی کنہیا لال لاہور کی تقربیا کافی کتابوں میں شاہ چراغ لاہوری رح کا تذکرہ ہے اور گیلانی خاندان کے رقبہ میں ہی ہائیکورٹ لاہور موجود ہے
Let us recall India contributed over 35 percent to world GDP before Muslims came. Muslims impoverished majority Hindus by collecting disproportionate taxes and building expensive useless maqbara etc.
What about the these things mentioned in well known compilations of mughal scholars?
V good historian girl well done
The Mughals aren’t portrayed in bad light altogether in India. Akbar, Humayun, Jahangir, Shah Jahan and Bahadur Shah Zafar are much celebrated rulers in India. It is only Aurangzeb’s rule marked by extreme religious persecution of Hindus and Sikhs that creates resentment for Mughal rule among certain sections of Indians.
इकॉनमी में मुग़लों का कोई योगदान नहीं था इंडिया हमेशा से अमीर और समृद्ध था l मुग़ल तो ख़ुद ग़रीबी और भुखमरी की वजह से यहाँ आए थे l वो तो एक फूटी कोढ़ी भी नहीं लाए थे l यहाँ खेती,हस्तशिल्प,इंडस्ट्री पहले से था l मुग़लों के समय कोई भी वैज्ञानिक प्रगति नहीं हुई l
Mughals give better administration political stability architecture monument etc
@@sirat-al-mustaqimbyshahabs1418 कभी नहीं भारत में व्यापार,हस्तशिल्प ,खेती हमेशा से अच्छे थे l देश हमेशा से समृद्ध था l मुर्दा लोगों के मक़बरे बनवाना कोई आर्किटेक्चर में योगदान हैं l भारत की दौलत देखकर ऐयाशी में डूब गये l
उस समय शिक्षा,चिकित्सा,विज्ञान और तकनीक में कोई काम नहीं हुआ l
पहले से बने मंदिरों,गुरुकुलों,मठों का नाश कर दिया l
Madam ko ye batana chahiye ki muslims economically aur socially kya add kiye? Jab invaders the fir addition kaise kar sakte hain😂 Jab Europe dark age se nikal kar scientific advancement ke towards move kar rha tha during 14th and 15th centuries tab ye so called Muslim rulers kar kya rahe the? Kya unhone waise institutions develop ki?
Unhone nhi kya that's why india become colonised i accept it
Let us know if you enjoyed this content!🙏
Yill wr were economically strong, nithing worked, how sbout education?
We were never free and we’re not free today. The style of slavery has changed.
Basically,
Ahmed Shah Abdali's ambitions in North West and North Indian Sub continent gave the British or the East India Company the breakthrough to establish a 'Raaj'.
British beat the Marathas and the Sikhs, two major Non Muslim Powers and the Mysorean Mercenary Rulers Hyder Ali and Tipu at their own game and became the sole Sovereigns in the Indian Sub Continent.
No it didn't.
Maratha civil war gave rise and bengal treachery gave rise to it
@@abhinavkumar9c017 Maybe there wouldn't have been a Civil War had there not been the defeat at Panipat.
@@hotfun07 not really, it would've caused the civil war to occur early.
Bari alig' company ki hukumat is an important book on arrival of Europeans and rise of British India company and then it's cruelty inflicted on the Indians.
mughal empire or british empire ke bich me maratha empire ne 144 (1674-1818) years raj kiya tha india me.. britishers khud kehte the ki hunme bharat ko marathose lia hai mughalonse se nahi...lagta hai bich me ki history pakistan me padhate nahi hai
Mughals defeted by Marathas and marathas defeated by British
Historical events are covered only after taking a hefty dose of steroid. The Arab invasion of Sind is covered flippantly. In fact, it's a prologue to hundreds of invasions that were to follow. In a book "Among the Believers', the writer Naipaul covers this selective killings of a warrior class and export of men and women used as bounty in Arab lands. The burden of history is too heavy. Both the host and the guest are not equipped to carry this load. Impossible to sit through this video. Exist, please.
First of all check the history the british didnt take over from mughal , they take over from marata empire and mind u im not even a marathi but that is the truth if u reserch u will find it easily only if u want to serch truly
Hilarious isn't it you fail to acknowledge that mugal were defeated by Maratha not British
There is nothing so called mughal architecture in India these all bulidings are Indian native origin tajmahal have 14 room inside it but not a single shrine and tomb have room inside it but tajmahal have all of it so tajmahal is not islamic structure
TU aisay hi sochta rehay sochna ka koi bill nhe ata😂
@@zaroonaz 😁 where mugal came from? Why no tajmahal like structure outside India jaahil? Mugal name given by briths also first Mughal king Akbar himself a kaafir he made own religion din e elai. Mughal word came from Mongolia they look like Chinese but Pakistani connect themselves with Saudi and turks 😂
Before brits came most of india was ruled by sikhs and marathas
Excellent talk. Very informative.
🙏
Ye sahi bol rhi
Pretty woman....beauty with brains !!
agar mughal doosare religions ke sath fair treatment karte the to mughals ne 30000+ Hindu aur Jain temples ko kyo toda tha aur Shri Guru Gobind Singh ji ke Shahibzado ko kyo maara tha?