Awesome.. I saw Buzz Aldrin speak for an hour here in NZ in 2010 about his experiences ON the Moon and Neil Armstrong said it would be harder to fake than to succeed.. thanks from NZ 👍🇳🇿
very well said. every person on the planet is equally indebted to everyone involved in this incredible challenge. thus makes me proud to be an American but more proud to be a human
Congratulations from Venezuela for one of the greatest moments of the mankind, remember: "That's one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind" . I send you my regards P.D Sorry for my english
The conversation between the astronauts and basic real-time then! How was it possible for four decades ago and, today, a television network to transmit an image across the globe are spending 2 seconds for the image to get there using the latest technology available today!
I still chuckle when I see conspiracy theories. The complete lack of evidence they have and the faith they put into it is astonishing, it's almost like a religion.
There were powerful relay stations all over the earth picking up their signal and relaying it to the Johnson Space Center. I was a 9 years old when this happened and I already knew that.
Hey, it's been a while since this video has been released, would you mind rereleasing this in higher quality? I remember this documentary being included on Disk 3 of When We Left Earth, and it was good quality, so can you use that as your base? T0hanks.
@marmelina7 1.) It's a camera on the outside of the craft. 2.) No, see above. 3.) Again, no. 4.) Only one landed at a time, though there were six total landings. 5.) Took off moon surface, re-attached to re-entry pod and came back.
I love how the astronauts went from Earth's gravity to zero gravity to the moon's gravity back to zero gravity then to an aircraft carrier and still knew how to walk in Earth's gravity as if they never left the planet. I couldn't walk straight if I took a short boat trip, yet for the astronauts it was a walk in the park.
@marmelina7 1) There was a camera outside the LM. Notice the picture is static and does not pan with Armstong. 2) See number one. 3) See number one. 4) No 5) The Apollo command module, named "Columbia" was orbitting the moon with a third Astronaut on board. Armstrong and Aldrin docked with that ship after leaving the moon and that was what they returned to Earth in.
I still find it sad that people don't believe this amazing feat because of a waving flag that seems odd. Newtons first law says that a body in motion stays in motion, it's not stopping because there's no air resistance.
One of the proudest moments in American history. We were all glued to our tv, praying nothing would go wrong. These brave heroes risked their lives, and faced certain death, at any time during this venture. The whole planet, and I do mean the whole planet, watched and listened for any news, minute by minute, while holding our breaths. And when we heard "The eagle has landed" our whole planet cheered, and it was broadcast on live tv all over the the world.
@Toudiyama Engineering Departments in cities throughout the world monitor the construction process. Building permits are issued after review of plans & specifications. A materials list is submitted with the plans and inspections take place during the course of construction to insure the plans and specs are adhered to. The Certified Steel Beams used at WTC were fire rated at 2,750 deg F. Meaning, they would sustain that temperature for up to 4 hours before loosing structural integrity.
@YDDES Im saying they had to have had some form of pulmonary system to have oxygen and they also had to have some form of heart to pump blood for the circulatory system so how is that one could be without the other? Evolution teaches that it was one step at a time. Little by little that "we evolved" when that could not be possible if our complex system would have had to be at the state it is at right now or it would not have worked at all.
I was eleven years old at the time but remember this as if it was yesterday. In looking back, one thing that stands out for me more than anything was the incredible sense of national pride. I remember the A/V monitor wheeling in the TV on the cart so the class could watch at school. Pretty sure it was a black and white. What I miss NOW is the diminished level of national pride we all once had. Perhaps we can restore this once again, someday. AIRBOYD, fine work again, thanks for posting!
@Fenris17 I don't mean to sound apprehensive or offensive, but Newton's 1st law of motion is a body in motion tends to stay in motion. When the flag was shook, (and with such bulky and clumsy movements, it was no wonder why) the top of the flag, which was suspended by a pole extending from the main pole, waved the rest of the flag. It kept going because there is no reason that it should stop. It finally stopped later because they made it stop moving.
acdeditch99 Almost correct, it stopped because primarily the vibrational movement of the flag would dissipate into the lunar surface. Also the action of friction, which dissipated the kinetic energy of the flag and pole. No human intervention required!
@1MtnBoy Outside the 'Field of gravity'???? So much for for Newton's inverse square business LOL. I didn't realise the curve just fell straight to zero at some point. I also didn't realise that the radiation had mass (or is it anti-mass) in that gravity protects us. Silly me thought it was electromagnetic field from a rotating iron core. Poor Faraday got it wrong as well. If the anode voltage is to weak the electrons fall to the bottom of the tube. Stupid electrons.
“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.” ― Carl Sagan
@Toudiyama Did you require a Surety supply bond? If performance of an obligation or undertaking is critical then a Surety bond guarantys performance. The cost of the bond is relatively minor and acts as a third party guaranty of performance and/or payment of a contract. Shakespeare's, Merchant of Venice "A pound of flesh" used to secure an obligation......
That lander is designed for week long missions. It has to provide life support and a base. The original lunar lander had to provide JUST enough to get astronauts home. They were only on the moon for 3 hours.
thats amazing! These guys left the earth! traveled over 3 days in the enormousness that is space. Imagine being in your tiny little module, looking out into the vast emptiness of space and realizing that if anything goes wrong, you are foo bar! They landed on another planet, look backed up at the sky and realize that the moon is now the planet... To bad that this world is plagued by war, nations spend billions of dollars trying to kill each other. Imagine how advance we would be if we had no war
Haha, that was awesome. You must be the guy who wrote the incomprehensible script to Transformers2. Could you point to a single bit of technology used to land on the moon that could have stopped a hijacked commercial airliner from flying into a building?
They didnt call them while on the moon, once they landed they were called and if they were call on the moon, it was transmitted through the radio, such as their communications. If you dont agree, explain how they got LIVE footage from the moon to earth without radio.
@YDDES In my opinion when I watched this film I found that one camera angle was not attached to the lander support leg. That was my point. Regardless you can easily see that the flag has a support to hold up straight but there is no wind blowing.
@YDDES I said there were 4 or 5 camera angles and ONE is not attached to the lander. It looked like there were more than only 2 camera angles to me...I would think there would be wind on the moon..Don't you think so?
@Referee001uk Britain allows teaching an unsupported theory, as scientific fact in a public textbook, without requiring the theory to have met the historical standard of "irrefutable evidence"? At what point, did the Theory of Evolution get put into British public school textbooks and taught as part of the science corriculum? i.e. Was Piltdown Man, included in British Textbooks, before or after 1913? When introduced into those British Public textbooks, was he labeled the "missing link"?
I have heard 2 different reasons why it seems to wave. They claim that it had a metal pole at the top of the flag, to hold it straight, so it wouldn't just drop. second I have seen a video where Michio Kaku, and yes I am a huge fan of his... He has said that the whole flag was a metal woven mesh with a metal pole to hold it straight out, so therefore if that was how it really was built and when then planted it and set it up, the movement they made reverberated through the whole flag and made it appear to be waving.. What is true? I, don't know??
@Toudiyama Structural Steel fabricators manufacture certified steel beams per the plans & specifications. Erection is roughly 50/50 in house or subbed to specialists. Tower cranes are typically rented. Construction materials haven't changed a great deal in the past 100 years, but advances in pnuematics & hydrolics have improved efficiency. Electrical, Mechanical, Structural Engineers contribute to architectural drawings. Calculations were formerly were done using sliderules..
Does anyone know how many pounds of fuel were needed to get the crew capsule back up to Lunar orbit? It always staggers me that so little was needed compared with the amount needed to get the modules out of Earth's gravity. I know there was no air resistance and only one sixth G but still the ratio must be enormous. The whole rocket weighed 2000 tons I think I remember.
That's because they almost didn't land. They almost ran out of lander fuel, and would have had to abort the landing if that happened. Also, Armstrong had to take over manual control because the computer was crapping out, so he was very intense. That's probably why he wasn't too excited. He needed a minute to let his nerves calm down, I would assume.
there was 4 or 5 camera angles that shot him stepping off the ship for 'the first time' and it was obvious that atleast one of them was not attached to the ship in any way...
@thenamesdatlon I'm not an US Citizen. But, I'm old enough to have followed the space programmes from the beginning, and I know that the installations at Cape Canaveral and in Huston, plus all the rockets and spaceships that were actually designed, built, tested and launched, costed a tremendous amount of money. JFK asked his advisors: "What can we do to beat Soviet in space? A spacestation? Land a man on the Moon?" They answered: "The Moon". Because they knew it could be done in a decade.
@likealaff lunar ground is not even... so sunlight is reflected differently in different areas.. so some flatter areas are more illuminated than irregular areas.. did you get that into your thick head??
Because it had a pole put in at the top to keep it upright, otherwise it'd just fall downwards and you wouldn't be able to see it, which would defeat the point of planting the flag in the first place
I rented a video from the library on space exploration some time ago that showed the condition of two Russian cosmonauts after being in space for many months. The narrator said, "Even though they exercised while in space when they returned to Earth they are unable to move a muscle. Imagine landing on another planet in this condition." They were shown sitting on top of the capsule unable to move. I say, you get reprogrammed for zero gravity and when you enter gravity again you can't move!
Another sad anniversary for all mankind,- July 20th, 2010. The greatest single mind-control experiment in history. Evil has a hypnotic beauty. Evil not only blinds us- it makes us view truth as an ugly monster: truth as the last thing we will believe. "The spectator is a dying animal." - The Lords 1969 James Douglas Morrison. "The most important insights are the last to be found, but the most important insights are methods."- F. Nietzsche
I read that an unusual number of the astronauts had developed cataracts (could be wrong though) as a result of the radiation. This and any other health problems could be enough to cause greater concern for the future. It is only proper that they learn from their mistakes.
I don't say that all these were fake but could anyone please answer my one question. As there is no wind on the surface of moon then why the flag was waving?
No.. them moving near it would have absolutely no effect. There isn't air on the moon. Also touching it would be like touching it here. Once you were done why would it keep moving? My question was to evoke skepticism. I'm skeptic and I think it's weird how it's moving. But if you can think of other reasons
"The only part of the electromagnetic spectrum where the Moon is brighter than the Sun is gamma rays. The surface of the Moon is baldly exposed to cosmic rays and solar flares. When cosmic rays hit the ground, they produce a dangerous spray of secondary particles right at your feet, and trigger little nuclear reactions that release yet more radiation in the form of neutrons. The lunar surface itself is radioactive!" -Dr Robert Naeye PhD, NASA GLAST Fermi Gamma Ray Space Telescope...
Perhaps the most famous misquotation is of Neil Armstrong's words as he stepped on to the Moon: He said 'That's one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind', but the 'a' in 'a man', which was a conversational 'uh man' was blotted out by a tiny bit of static, Cronkite misheard it and misquoted it, and it has been misquoted endlessly ever since. Armstrong later confirmed that he said 'a man', but that made no difference to the endless misquotations. And of course he said 'a man'; his words do not make good sense otherwise.
For all of you believers....How did we see it LIVE...Where was the satellite Dish..and by the way Neil Armstrong was the second Man on the Moon...cause the first man was the Camera Man filming him stepping off the capsule..
The camera was in the descent stage, deployed by Armstrong by pulling a lanyard. The live video was transmitted to the moon and picked up by a space communications station in Australia. Try doing some research, you ig ignorant dullard.
Im not saying moon landings were fake or real, but before anyone mentions the lack of stars or the flag blowing or the shadows, you should read the scientific facts first as these can all be easily explained. The radiation question does sound dodgy to me though.
Check out project Orion. We could probably sent huge spaceships into space using nuclear propulsion. There just isn't good enough reasons to do so - at least for now.
The stills do only have one source of light. But possibly the actual camera had a flash. Which equals a second light source. You do realize sound travels through air. There is no air on the moon (Hence the need for space suits). Blast marks? - When did they say they used this? You seem to get these questions from your imagination.
That was very very interesting, i was not alive during that time but i did know about the part of the U.S. history. Neil Armstrong was the first man on the moon!!! but even though that was history their is going to be, other reasons for going into outer space also. Yes going on the moon was apart of history, but now it is many yrs later and scientist have other request!!
with all the technology right now,why there are no more moon mission,it is quite odd,it makes you think,what happen really out there. or they never go to the moon.
@YDDES Your assumptions are thin and unlikely how can you believe this? How could a cell that is so primitive become so complex by accident? There is no probable way for the DNA to be so different if all DNA started exactly the same. Someone or something had to have altered it at some point for it to change. When a cell is divided it still contains the same properties regardless of size and division of it.
I read somewhere that Armstrong and Aldrin' pulses were over 150 bpm during those minutes prior to landing.
Two incredible brave and professional men.
to this day apollo 11 remains the single greatest achievement by mankind. never to be replicated or outdone.
Awesome.. I saw Buzz Aldrin speak for an hour here in NZ in 2010 about his experiences ON the Moon and Neil Armstrong said it would be harder to fake than to succeed.. thanks from NZ 👍🇳🇿
very well said. every person on the planet is equally indebted to everyone involved in this incredible challenge. thus makes me proud to be an American but more proud to be a human
this video is incredible was a milestone for humanity
Congratulations from Venezuela for one of the greatest moments of the mankind, remember: "That's one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind" . I send you my regards
P.D Sorry for my english
The conversation between the astronauts and basic real-time then! How was it possible for four decades ago and, today, a television network to transmit an image across the globe are spending 2 seconds for the image to get there using the latest technology available today!
I still chuckle when I see conspiracy theories.
The complete lack of evidence they have and the faith they put into it is astonishing, it's almost like a religion.
There were powerful relay stations all over the earth picking up their signal and relaying it to the Johnson Space Center. I was a 9 years old when this happened and I already knew that.
Hey, it's been a while since this video has been released, would you mind rereleasing this in higher quality? I remember this documentary being included on Disk 3 of When We Left Earth, and it was good quality, so can you use that as your base? T0hanks.
@marmelina7
1.) It's a camera on the outside of the craft.
2.) No, see above.
3.) Again, no.
4.) Only one landed at a time, though there were six total landings.
5.) Took off moon surface, re-attached to re-entry pod and came back.
never get Bord of this stuff. nice one
I love how the astronauts went from Earth's gravity to zero gravity to the moon's gravity back to zero gravity then to an aircraft carrier and still knew how to walk in Earth's gravity as if they never left the planet. I couldn't walk straight if I took a short boat trip, yet for the astronauts it was a walk in the park.
this is what we humans can do and im so proud
GREAT DOCUMENTARY !!!
@marmelina7 1) There was a camera outside the LM. Notice the picture is static and does not pan with Armstong.
2) See number one.
3) See number one.
4) No
5) The Apollo command module, named "Columbia" was orbitting the moon with a third Astronaut on board. Armstrong and Aldrin docked with that ship after leaving the moon and that was what they returned to Earth in.
I still find it sad that people don't believe this amazing feat because of a waving flag that seems odd. Newtons first law says that a body in motion stays in motion, it's not stopping because there's no air resistance.
The most impressive sci-fi movie! How much did it cost???
That plaster of paris moon ball is hysterical. How people could have believe that crap back then is scary.
One of the proudest moments in American history. We were all glued to our tv, praying nothing would go wrong. These brave heroes risked their lives, and faced certain death, at any time during this venture. The whole planet, and I do mean the whole planet, watched and listened for any news, minute by minute, while holding our breaths. And when we heard "The eagle has landed" our whole planet cheered, and it was broadcast on live tv all over the the world.
Beautiful documentary.
@Toudiyama
Engineering Departments in cities throughout the world monitor the construction process. Building permits are issued after review of plans & specifications. A materials list is submitted with the plans and inspections take place during the course of construction to insure the plans and specs are adhered to. The Certified Steel Beams used at WTC were fire rated at 2,750 deg F. Meaning, they would sustain that temperature for up to 4 hours before loosing structural integrity.
@YDDES Im saying they had to have had some form of pulmonary system to have oxygen and they also had to have some form of heart to pump blood for the circulatory system so how is that one could be without the other? Evolution teaches that it was one step at a time. Little by little that "we evolved" when that could not be possible if our complex system would have had to be at the state it is at right now or it would not have worked at all.
The Moon. The fucking Moon. This is my earliest childhood memory.
I was eleven years old at the time but remember this as if it was yesterday. In looking back, one thing that stands out for me more than anything was the incredible sense of national pride.
I remember the A/V monitor wheeling in the TV on the cart so the class could watch at school. Pretty sure it was a black and white.
What I miss NOW is the diminished level of national pride we all once had. Perhaps we can restore this once again, someday. AIRBOYD, fine work again, thanks for posting!
The greatest height that the human species has achieved. It has been downhill since.
@Fenris17 I don't mean to sound apprehensive or offensive, but Newton's 1st law of motion is a body in motion tends to stay in motion. When the flag was shook, (and with such bulky and clumsy movements, it was no wonder why) the top of the flag, which was suspended by a pole extending from the main pole, waved the rest of the flag. It kept going because there is no reason that it should stop. It finally stopped later because they made it stop moving.
acdeditch99 Almost correct, it stopped because primarily the vibrational movement of the flag would dissipate into the lunar surface. Also the action of friction, which dissipated the kinetic energy of the flag and pole. No human intervention required!
@1MtnBoy Outside the 'Field of gravity'???? So much for for Newton's inverse square business LOL. I didn't realise the curve just fell straight to zero at some point.
I also didn't realise that the radiation had mass (or is it anti-mass) in that gravity protects us. Silly me thought it was electromagnetic field from a rotating iron core. Poor Faraday got it wrong as well. If the anode voltage is to weak the electrons fall to the bottom of the tube. Stupid electrons.
“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.”
― Carl Sagan
@Toudiyama
Did you require a Surety supply bond? If performance of an obligation or undertaking is critical then a Surety bond guarantys performance. The cost of the bond is relatively minor and acts as a third party guaranty of performance and/or payment of a contract. Shakespeare's, Merchant of Venice "A pound of flesh" used to secure an obligation......
That lander is designed for week long missions.
It has to provide life support and a base.
The original lunar lander had to provide JUST enough to get astronauts home. They were only on the moon for 3 hours.
"Live From The Surface Of The Moon", classic.
thats amazing! These guys left the earth! traveled over 3 days in the enormousness that is space. Imagine being in your tiny little module, looking out into the vast emptiness of space and realizing that if anything goes wrong, you are foo bar! They landed on another planet, look backed up at the sky and realize that the moon is now the planet... To bad that this world is plagued by war, nations spend billions of dollars trying to kill each other. Imagine how advance we would be if we had no war
Haha, that was awesome. You must be the guy who wrote the incomprehensible script to Transformers2.
Could you point to a single bit of technology used to land on the moon that could have stopped a hijacked commercial airliner from flying into a building?
1: We did go back 5 more times after Apollo 11 and failed one time.
2: Which technology would make it easier (and ceaper) to go to Moon today?
They didnt call them while on the moon, once they landed they were called and if they were call on the moon, it was transmitted through the radio, such as their communications. If you dont agree, explain how they got LIVE footage from the moon to earth without radio.
@YDDES In my opinion when I watched this film I found that one camera angle was not attached to the lander support leg. That was my point. Regardless you can easily see that the flag has a support to hold up straight but there is no wind blowing.
@YDDES I said there were 4 or 5 camera angles and ONE is not attached to the lander. It looked like there were more than only 2 camera angles to me...I would think there would be wind on the moon..Don't you think so?
@Referee001uk
Britain allows teaching an unsupported theory, as scientific fact in a public textbook, without requiring the theory to have met the historical standard of "irrefutable evidence"? At what point, did the Theory of Evolution get put into British public school textbooks and taught as part of the science corriculum? i.e. Was Piltdown Man, included in British Textbooks, before or after 1913? When introduced into those British Public textbooks, was he labeled the "missing link"?
I have heard 2 different reasons why it seems to wave. They claim that it had a metal pole at the top of the flag, to hold it straight, so it wouldn't just drop. second I have seen a video where Michio Kaku, and yes I am a huge fan of his... He has said that the whole flag was a metal woven mesh with a metal pole to hold it straight out, so therefore if that was how it really was built and when then planted it and set it up, the movement they made reverberated through the whole flag and made it appear to be waving.. What is true? I, don't know??
@Toudiyama
Structural Steel fabricators manufacture certified steel beams per the plans & specifications. Erection is roughly 50/50 in house or subbed to specialists. Tower cranes are typically rented. Construction materials haven't changed a great deal in the past 100 years, but advances in pnuematics & hydrolics have improved efficiency. Electrical, Mechanical, Structural Engineers contribute to architectural drawings. Calculations were formerly were done using sliderules..
Goodbye, Commander, we'll miss you
How one would be very honored to meet Neil Armstrong & Buzz Auldren in person on this very day 40 years ago?
I am hoping I could be the one on moon someday
Does anyone know how many pounds of fuel were needed to get the crew capsule back up to Lunar orbit? It always staggers me that so little was needed compared with the amount needed to get the modules out of Earth's gravity. I know there was no air resistance and only one sixth G but still the ratio must be enormous. The whole rocket weighed 2000 tons I think I remember.
Taz0161 !
The Hubble can not focus on that short distance.
2:50 Song Name?
That's because they almost didn't land. They almost ran out of lander fuel, and would have had to abort the landing if that happened. Also, Armstrong had to take over manual control because the computer was crapping out, so he was very intense. That's probably why he wasn't too excited. He needed a minute to let his nerves calm down, I would assume.
¡Una hazaña impresionante!
@vettedreams pictures
The whole thing just makes me so emotional. People don't realize how much NASA has contributed to our current lifestyle.
I wouldn't doubt it !
there was 4 or 5 camera angles that shot him stepping off the ship for 'the first time' and it was obvious that atleast one of them was not attached to the ship in any way...
There was only one tv camera mounted on the LM which Neil deployed before climbing down the ladder
@thenamesdatlon I'm not an US Citizen. But, I'm old enough to have followed the space programmes from the beginning, and I know that the installations at Cape Canaveral and in Huston, plus all the rockets and spaceships that were actually designed, built, tested and launched, costed a tremendous amount of money. JFK asked his advisors: "What can we do to beat Soviet in space? A spacestation? Land a man on the Moon?" They answered: "The Moon". Because they knew it could be done in a decade.
@1MtnBoy Okay James, your right, I bow down to you.
At 14;48 and 15;10.what on Earth are those two lights on the left, just above the surface ???
@likealaff lunar ground is not even... so sunlight is reflected differently in different areas.. so some flatter areas are more illuminated than irregular areas.. did you get that into your thick head??
Because it had a pole put in at the top to keep it upright, otherwise it'd just fall downwards and you wouldn't be able to see it, which would defeat the point of planting the flag in the first place
I rented a video from the library on space exploration some time ago that showed the condition of two Russian cosmonauts after being in space for many months. The narrator said, "Even though they exercised while in space when they returned to Earth they are unable to move a muscle. Imagine landing on another planet in this condition." They were shown sitting on top of the capsule unable to move. I say, you get reprogrammed for zero gravity and when you enter gravity again you can't move!
However impractical Orion is, it's still a cool concept to think about
If man wants to see something, he will always see it.
Another sad anniversary for all mankind,- July 20th, 2010. The greatest single mind-control experiment in history. Evil has a hypnotic beauty. Evil not only blinds us- it makes us view truth as an ugly monster: truth as the last thing we will believe. "The spectator is a dying animal." - The Lords 1969 James Douglas Morrison.
"The most important insights are the last to be found, but the most important insights are methods."- F. Nietzsche
Haha. Nice comeback, buddy.
@Slojamoz oh what about the Fake box toss with added speed? Looks more like a Catch in Reverse to me!
I read that an unusual number of the astronauts had developed cataracts (could be wrong though) as a result of the radiation. This and any other health problems could be enough to cause greater concern for the future. It is only proper that they learn from their mistakes.
Because it's reacting to the astronauts touching it, as well as the vibrations from the astronauts moving near it. Better?
@Synthetrix Can they see Alan Shepard's golf ball?
I don't say that all these were fake but could anyone please answer my one question. As there is no wind on the surface of moon then why the flag was waving?
@jerichomutant you're right, they should have just filmed it with their 20 mega-pixel HD camcorders they had back then, huh?
No.. them moving near it would have absolutely no effect. There isn't air on the moon. Also touching it would be like touching it here. Once you were done why would it keep moving? My question was to evoke skepticism. I'm skeptic and I think it's weird how it's moving. But if you can think of other reasons
"The only part of the electromagnetic spectrum where the Moon is brighter than the Sun is gamma rays. The surface of the Moon is baldly exposed to cosmic rays and solar flares. When cosmic rays hit the ground, they produce a dangerous spray of secondary particles right at your feet, and trigger little nuclear reactions that release yet more radiation in the form of neutrons. The lunar surface itself is radioactive!"
-Dr Robert Naeye PhD, NASA GLAST Fermi Gamma Ray Space Telescope...
Perhaps the most famous misquotation is of Neil Armstrong's words as he stepped on to the Moon: He said 'That's one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind', but the 'a' in 'a man', which was a conversational 'uh man' was blotted out by a tiny bit of static, Cronkite misheard it and misquoted it, and it has been misquoted endlessly ever since. Armstrong later confirmed that he said 'a man', but that made no difference to the endless misquotations. And of course he said 'a man'; his words do not make good sense otherwise.
We must go forward..not backwards....through fear!
Oh, you got me.
I have this on VHS
the pics are not original they are made in holywood.but im not sure if really there was any moon landing.
why is there light only where the astronausts are at??
We must go forward..not backwards.
one of the oddest documentaries on the moon landing have seen.
For all of you believers....How did we see it LIVE...Where was the satellite Dish..and by the way Neil Armstrong was the second Man on the Moon...cause the first man was the Camera Man filming him stepping off the capsule..
The camera was in the descent stage, deployed by Armstrong by pulling a lanyard. The live video was transmitted to the moon and picked up by a space communications station in Australia. Try doing some research, you ig ignorant dullard.
INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION IS JUST 220 MILES FROM EARTH. AND WE TRAVELED 500,000 MILES IN 1970s.
@AirGunsPlusReviews, about 75 Germans and about 399,925 others of many heritages. Credit goes to ALL of them & not 1 less.
Im not saying moon landings were fake or real, but before anyone mentions the lack of stars or the flag blowing or the shadows, you should read the scientific facts first as these can all be easily explained. The radiation question does sound dodgy to me though.
Check out project Orion. We could probably sent huge spaceships into space using nuclear propulsion. There just isn't good enough reasons to do so - at least for now.
The stills do only have one source of light. But possibly the actual camera had a flash. Which equals a second light source.
You do realize sound travels through air. There is no air on the moon (Hence the need for space suits).
Blast marks? - When did they say they used this? You seem to get these questions from your imagination.
@1MtnBoy I was referring to Andrews weird post, not yours. He says gravity LOL
That was very very interesting, i was not alive during that time but i did know about the part of the U.S. history. Neil Armstrong was the first man on the moon!!! but even though that was history their is going to be, other reasons for going into outer space also. Yes going on the moon was apart of history, but now it is many yrs later and scientist have other request!!
@Synthetrix well said sir
@1MtnBoy Lunar Express is not built by SpaceX.
You know if it wasn't for the Moon landings we wouldn't have the technology we have now
Ever thought of that
You see a moon landing, all I see are the flood of money in their pockets...
I see light only a few square feet around them, why
1:22 huge achievment
with all the technology right now,why there are no more moon mission,it is quite odd,it makes you think,what happen really out there. or they never go to the moon.
@jtkirkfan2002 they can only imagine what it feels like too
@krisdevalle Who is 'they'?
Unless your parents are rocket scientists, they dont know what they're talking about.
@YDDES Your assumptions are thin and unlikely how can you believe this? How could a cell that is so primitive become so complex by accident? There is no probable way for the DNA to be so different if all DNA started exactly the same. Someone or something had to have altered it at some point for it to change. When a cell is divided it still contains the same properties regardless of size and division of it.
How can you "see" that the flag is "waving" when it is a still???
Filmed at 3400 Riverside Drive, Burbank, CA 91522
"The eagle has landed" doesn't sound exactly excited for what he is doing.