All the men from Mercury, Gemini and Apollo are some of my greatest heroes. They're the greatest pilots to ever live to alot of people... They certainly are in my book. The Crew of Apollo One will always hold a special place in my heart as well. I'm so grateful for their efforts aswell as all the Astronauts during that time.
takes nads of Iron to live in a diaper for months on end, me??, no way could I build the courage to soil my pants for weeks on end and still remain chirpy.
One of the better telling docs about going to the moon. Lots of nice high quality footage I never saw (or cannot remeber having seen before...). Thanks NASA for painstakingly filming everything!
Watched Apollo 11 launch as a schoolboy at Woomera Rocket Range in South Australia. Less than 7 years later I was a shift tech at Orroral Valley tracking station outside Canberra and we supported the multiple ALSEP experiments installed on the lunar surface by Apollo astronauts.
People who believe the moon landings did not happen suffer grave mental problems, generally below par IQ, are often badly narcissistic and generally unhappy individuals. If they weren't so obnoxious one would really have to pity them. Although their self pity is generally enough.
I often wondered why the incomplete and curtailed missions were ever considered "embarrassments". How could that be? They were doing things never done before! This is one of the best documentaries I have seen. Lots of footage I have never seen before and I thought I had seen everything! Absolutely marvellous !
On landing on the Moon would the engine be heard as it was about to land as we do not hear any noise from any engines on the lamb. Just commentary. Why was that?? Rockets make lots of noise
What was the weight ratio compared to Saturn 5 only being tested without a payload of the lamb and extra fuel to take it out of orbit towards the moon and to have fuel to get off the moon?Like would it be Top heavy and if the Saturn 5 worked so good why did they stop using it? Never understood that how they carried a moon buggy as well surely the Saturn 5 would have be unstable on take off. With all that weight at the top hope someone can answer this then I can understand how they did it. Lot of payload and fuel at the top mmmm. Saturn 5 would get astronauts to the space station instead of using Russians rockets?? Surely ???so is there or was there a Cold War between the USA and Russia when we use their Rockets to get to the space station don’t seem any differences there ?? To me
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT OMG OMG OMG OMG THATS SUCH A W im obsessed with nasa stuff
@@jonnny8 Since there is no atmosphere on the moon, you would not hear any sound there, but inside the lunar lander you should be able to hear it and probably feel it too.
@@jonnny8 First of all, the Saturn 5 was designed to go to the moon. Using it just to go to the ISS is overkill. Much simpler rockets like the Falcon are much much cheaper. There was quite a lot of testing before landing on the moon: January 27, 1967 Fatal plugs-out test Apollo 1. November 9, 1967 Unmanned test flight Apollo 4. January 22, 1968 Unmanned test flight Apollo 5. April 4, 1968 Unmanned test flight Apollo 6. October 11, 1968 First manned flight Apollo 7. Testing of Command and Service module. December 21, 1968 Apollo 8. First flight Saturn 5, First to the moon, First behind the moon. March 3, 1969 Apollo 9. Practice with the LM around the earth. May 18, 1969 Apollo 10. Practicing with the LM around the moon.
Thank you for putting this up. I'm 71 & I watched all of this on my grandparents B/W TV back then in NC. Besides Apollo 11 I don't remember details. Now retired in N. Florida I have been to two Shuttle launches & only can dream of what it was like to watch some of the first manned rocket launches. Shalom
@@lifesahobby The Apollo 11 crews were exposed to 1.67 mSv per second as they crossed the Van Allen radiation belt. This amounts to a total exposure of 1.8 Sv in 3 hours of travel through the radiation belt during the mission. Any exposure to 1 Sv or more, however, brings about fatal injuries. The radiation readings for the Apollo 11 astronauts’ skin of 0.18 rad, significantly, did not differ from radiation readings from missions restricted to low earth orbit. Data clearly proves that the Apollo 11 astronauts were not sufficiently protected against radiation: Neither the spaceship nor the spacesuits contained lead. Aluminum is ineffective against gamma and neutron rays. The calculated exposure of the Apollo crew was 1.8 Sv, an amount associated with nausea, vomiting, bone marrow changes, and 20% mortality. Surprisingly, no Apollo astronaut showed any ill effects from radiation exposure. These inconsistencies seem to reflect either possible over-estimation or under-reporting of the health hazards summarized in Safe Passage. Furthermore, these medical inconsistencies seem to highlight the surprising observations that the Apollo 11 astronauts did not show any signs of space sickness from microgravity upon their return to Earth.
Apollo 11 will always be THE flight of Apollo but to my mind - the Xmas 1968 flight of Apollo 8 into Lunar orbit was stunning in it's concept , audacity and execution .
Funny you say that. For me personally Apollo 8 was even greater than Apollo 11. I still shudder when I remember that "Go for TLI", sending man away from earth to another celestial boy for the first time ever. I was a young boy but I fully grasped the momentous importance of this event and the risks involved. Deep nostalgia for a now old man.
Apollo 10 was huge. And what a crew! All three would command a mission. Cernan flew in the LEM in lunar orbit twice and would be the last man from Apollo to walk on the moon. Stafford was extremely intelligent, the ultimate test pilot, and would eventually become the father of stealth aircraft development. And John Young, the Astronaut’s astronaut, would eventually be chosen to command both Apollo 16 and the first flight of the Space Shuttle.
I think it's more that it's largely unknown rather than underrated . Anybody with a clue knows how important Gemini was - rendezvous , EVA and honing techniques for working in 'zero-G' , long duration missions , not forgetting continued operational experience and discovery of excessive crumb with Cocoa Beach deli corned beef sandwiches.
@@cronistamundano8189 I think it was Gemini that broke the Russian’s back and put us significantly ahead in the race. I completely agree with DrTWG that unknown rather than underrated applies. For those familiar with the maturation of the US space program during the 70s Gemini was huge. During an anniversary celebration for Apollo 10 I had the distinct pleasure of meeting many of the Apollo astronauts during a cocktail party. And of equal significance several of the flight directors including Glynn Lunney!
Most people referred to the progroam as "Gem en eee" even though most people say "Gem en eye". It's been said that the German engineers would say "Gem en ee" and the name stayed that way during thoughs days. Also, at 1:16:03 I believe that's Neil Armstrong's Omega Speedmaster that he's wearing on his left wrist. He never wore it on the moon, so Buzz Aldrin was the first person to wear his Speedmaster watch on the moon. It's been said that Neil left his watch hanging on the instrument panel because the built-in clock on the panel stopped working.
@@wildboar7473 Maybe they don't realize that originally, the LM was referred to as the LEM for the Lunar Excursion Module. It was later shortened to the term LM, or Lunar Module.
@@daffidavit no rather a anal antihoaxer of 20 years plus.... :) deldelahaye3811 (parts....) wildboar7473 More ignorance....the term LEM was dropped in 1967...The Apollo landers are always referred to as LMs ...pronounced LEM...but those who continue to use the acronym LEM just show they have little, or no in- depth, knowledge of the NASA Apollo missions. 😬 wildboar7473 Please pay attention....! The MIT quote is dated 1966. I very clearly pointed out that the name " LEM " was dropped NASA in 1967, although some sources say that the notice to change the name went out in June 1966...It is quite likely that the MIT program was made before that date...or they just used the old name LEM *because that was what the general public knew* ,, 🤒 The fact that some sources refer to " LM or LEM " is simply because many people do not know that the name was changed *early in the program* ..and the fact that LM is pronounced LEM does not help the willfully ignorant... 😝 The fact that other people use the term LEM is irrelevant and does not change the fact that the name was changed to LM over 50 years ago. And just because somebody referred to working on the original design of the LEMm as it was then called, *does not excuse the use of the wrong term now.* 🥵 It is not " VERY BAD " to call it the LEM now, it is just factually WRONG...and *when we are debunking conspiracy garbage we rely on getting the correct facts.. It is called attention to detail* - something conspiracy spouters continuously ignore.. 😵💫
@@daffidavit@daffidavit my thoughts exactly! When I was young (around age 10 or 11), we had this Encarta 95 (I think) Encyclopedia on the computer and I was very much interested in the space program after watching Apollo 13. The Lunar Excursion Module is one of the words I still remember clearly till this day after learning from that encyclopedia.
@@asifansari3430 and you, like my father, have a unique perspective, like anyone that was there to watch it.. you KNOW that those wacky internet moon-landing conspiracy theories have confused so many younger people, and I for one, think it’s important that you tell people of your experience. Most fairly intelligent people can distinguish the difference between internet garbage and verifiable facts, but there are FAR too many people that believe the conspiracies for the simple reason that they want to believe that they know something that makes them FEEL special. This “Dunning-Kruger effect” symptom is one of the things that is disturbing to see in the people we encounter in life, but I think it’s important that people that have personal experience that refutes the conspiracy garbage, speak up, even if some will ALWAYS find the conspiracies more fun than reality. This is unfortunately, just the world we live in, but keep up the good fight for intelligence! 😎
The narrator says at 3:38 "Coast-to-coast, citizens were watching" the failed Vanguard launch of December 6, 1957. In fact, the launch was not televised live. An article on page 76 of the December 16, 1957 issue of the magazine "Broadcasting" says, "WTVT (TV) Tampa-St. Petersburg, Fla. aired 400 feet of film of the explosion of the Vanguard missile one hour and 50 minutes after the earth satellite burst into flames Dec. 6 at Cape Canaveral, Fla., 110 miles from the station. Roger Sharp, a WTVT newscaster, and a 2-man camera crew...covered the explosion from four miles away and rushed the film to WTVT by chartered plane. WTVT supplied prints for stations in New York, Oklahoma City, New Orleans, Montgomery, Louisville and Miami in time for newscasts that same day."
1:08:12 this has been debunked. And if they did land.. the ascent motor was completely separate. However, this was an excellent video and I learned some new things 👍.
👍Facts are important, not propaganda, today Americans can't get into orbit, so they could hardly have been to the moon 55 years ago and returned safely in 17 missions. Today, an American gets into orbit only thanks to Russia.
Vanguard TV-3 bounced clear of the explosion and started transmitting, despite being damaged. It resides in the Smithsonian at the Udvar-Hazy annex.i Vanguard 1 is still up there, inert, but still trucking along at 60+ years.
Project Apollo is still the most amazing memory if my teenage years & probably America's greatest achievement. They changed history in a way that will be remembered 500, even 1000 years in the future - people will still remember that Neil & Buzz walking on the moon in 1969.
58:20 I've always said that this is one of the most important photographs in human history, taken at a time of incredible instability on our fragile Earth..
"The result of an unprecedented surge in scientific and engineering activity with remarkable spin-offs… in less than 9 years the United States went from space amateur to technological hyperpower". That's proof of how humans could do amazing things, in a relatively short period of time, if they really put their mind to it. And that's why wise Jacque Fresco stated that we must put our mind to changing the socioeconomic organization system under which our society operates as we did to put a man on the moon. Watch "The choice is ours" documentary to learn about his proposal.
Yah there are allot of special people running around in here, I bet allot of them are bots. The rest are just the crazies with no brain and no life who wish they could be the next famous person but will work their jobs sweeping and mopping the floors.
@@danielecognome7501 And so are our current times. The US is facing its most critical "launch" come 2024 year end. May you vote with your heart and test your decision against what your mind knows.
These are the folks that rot their brains on TikTok all day and haven’t read a book, perhaps ever. The same ones that ask me how to cook ramen noodles when their microwave doesn’t work.
@ I’m not a huge fan of the ”prove it”-people but_I will say this: I now a hoax when I encouter one! The staged so called Moonlanding was ridiculously bad! NASA is all about telling blatened lies to humanity for the purpose of making us (human beings) feel insignificant before an endless big black, scary Universe that doesn’t really exist! So, back to the Moon_seeing the blue sky (on a sunny day) right through it should be enough, it’s transparent! The Moon’s face-off is not a landscape! The distinguished pattern is the rigidity of the natural plasma-moon. It does not reflect sunlight! It is cooler in Moonlight than in Moon-shadow, go measure!🍏
@LarsGsanger You don't see blue sky through the Moon, but rather in front of it. Plasma is amorphous, it has no mountains, craters, or shadows. And how do you explain the phases and lunar eclipses?
It appears that, for an astronaut, having drama with Mission Control is especially bad for your career, as illustrated by Mercury-Atlas 7 and Apollo 7.
Wally thought he could dictate the rules to Nasa, they all got what they deserved for disobeying orders; besides, he made a career out of he's "stubborn" cold.
If you are reading some of the comments here , you will find so many people who lack conviction in their argument about humans not going to the moon . Thats why people argue , they want someone to do the homework for them.. until then they suffer the doubts . This us what happens when you are given choices to study physics , organic chemistry and you say " its too hard " you end up never developing a mind with conceptual capacity .. and you might always pick the easy way from that point on . Its just laziness to doubt and its crazy to argue with them . If you had some guy running across ten lanes of highway, it would be really silly to run across the road with them telling them theyre doing something stupid . So dont argue with them .. youll never change those who never took the ambitious subjects . Youll find behind them all is a lack of physics , science, objectivity , conceptual thought . And that's why they rattle like they do . Here to india .. with the first woman , here to christina cock , heres to the apollo program , vostok, gemini , and all the brave ones who risked it all to inspire us . Gods speed .. 77 tons all the way m may the force be with you and may peace be with those who just dont know .
@lifesahobby Can't get past the Van Allen Belts, bud. Do you honestly believe anyone and everyone who knows that the landings were fake are simply too lazy, uneducated
@@lifesahobby Can't get past the Van Allen Belts, bud. That's just the tip of the iceberg. Do you honestly believe anyone and everyone who knows that the landings were fake are simply too lazy, uneducated or lack the understanding of physics, science, etc....? Is that why there are scientists, engineers etc.... all over the world who are very educated that agree NASA faked the landings. What do you say to that? Wake up!
~~ From the day JFK made the challenge in 1962 to put men on the moon before the end of the decade - NASA basically had a blank check to make it happen - but they also had the engineering talent ( and the drive & the discipline ) to make it happen - only when they had to make Apollo 17 the final manned mission in 1972 were the economic realities taking hold - the space shuttle was supposed to be the cost-saving alternative - but it never was that. Now it's just all about putting more satellites in orbit - making collisions an ever-increasing danger - and of course space tourism - for rich folks ..
56:1756:4256:5358:051:00:49 1:17:18 I like that when filming flights from inside a spaceship, there is always a blue sky outside the window. There was always good weather in space lol
I know you're obviously trolling, but just in case you are new to general Space Science, or have read little on the matter ( I'm 52, so was educated at a time when you needed to read on subjects extensively, unlike today), let me try to explain. The Blue Sky, as you call it, is apparent because the camera, or window, is looking DOWN at the earth below. The atmosphere of the earth, especially in Low Earth Orbit, always looks blue. If the camera was looking out into the blackness of space, you would see nothing. The astronauts would see stars, but the Camera, and by extension we the viewer, cannot resolve stars, so the sky looks black. Go outside tonight and snap off one pic of the sky and look at the image. You will see no stars. Maybe Venus, or the moon if its bright enough, but no stars. You need a long exposure of more than a second to see any stars. Some phones, on night mode, will do it automatically, but generally no.
@Hiram1000 "The Astronauts would see stars"? Wonder why Neil Armstrong and Michael Collins couldn't see them while they went to the moon and back with Apollo 11. Nor did others from Apollo 12 through 17! THEIR own words! Look into it!
@@matthewmcinnis9368Any time you have a significant light source, sun, interior lights, ambient light pollution, the light overwhelms the dim stars, plus your pupils adjust smaller and the stars become hidden, even in space. That’s why the astronauts could not see the stars, even on the surface of the moon, given its reflective surface.
@RichardinNC1 my point was there are different answers from the Astronauts who went to the moon regarding seeing stars or not. Why the discrepancies between those involved in the same "mission"?
1:08:20 There it is again. I think that's a MYTH. I cannot IMAGINE that crew trying to make an unauthorized landing. Your whole life is building to this moment, and you are going to BLOW it by performing some stunt, for which neither they nor the guys on the ground had made any plans. I think that's utter BS. I'm sure they short-fueled the LM because the extra fuel was simply unnecessary. On space missions, you're always looking for ways to save whatever weight you can, and I'm sure that was just one more of those cases.
NASA is still dreaming that their Lie would come true AFTER China landed her astronauts on the Moon . Dream on NASA. Prices are going up and American GDP is crashing !
@@traveler142 False. Man has been traveling to low earth orbit and beyond since the 1950s. Try to keep up with the rest of us. Nobody else's fault you're stuck in the past.
JFK said the end of the decade. In this entire video the guy talks about 12-31-1969 being the deadline. However the deadline (decade) is actually 12-31-1970.
please explain how it works. The calendar was created by Catholic Romans who used Roman Numbers. The thought of “0” zero was not considered. The first year was “1”. There was never a 01-01-0000, instead it was 01-01-0001. Therefore a decade starts at every 20_1 and last for 10 years.
@@roccorossetti7579 You WERE home-schooled. JFK's statement about reaching the moon "by the end of the decade" referred to the 1960s, meaning before the start of 1970. This aligns with the common understanding of a decade as a span of 10 years starting from a year ending in 0 and ending in a year ending in 9 (e.g., 1960-1969). The general modern usage defines decades this way. A pseudointellectual often engages in discussions in a way that seems knowledgeable but lacks true understanding or depth.
I read back a ways and didn't see anything about it, but there is a boomerang shaped object on the right side spinning from bottom to top at 57:10 there abouts. it's not hard to see. looks out of place but I guess there was junk up there already.
Lost count how many times ive watch this Nasa to the moon . A bit help from aussie space honeysuckle creek You got look it up this was a new area of tech that change the world .
Aussies should also know about the 64-meter radio telescope at Parkes, New South Wales, which was responsible for receiving the signals from most of the 2 ½ - hour Moonwalk.
@@jakepopalo Советский Луноход в ноябре 1970 первым прилунился на Луне и забрал на Землю содержимое лунной поверхности. Советский космонавт первым в космос полетел, Советский спутник первым был выведен на орбиту
@@sarkissati1217 в 69году Аполлон11 прилунился,два астронавта погуляли по Луне и уже вернулся с Луны,доставил десятки кг.реголита. А ты тычешь свой лохоход🤣🤣🤣 А фейк о "полете" Гагарина своей бабушке расскажи. Все космические достижения ссср благодаря украинцу С.П.Королеву ,группе немецких ученых создавшие А4( ФАУ2) Где доказательства "полета " Гагарина!?Их нет,нет ни видео ,нет ни Гагарина...🤣
@@sarkissati1217Sovjeti su čestitali amerikancima kad su se spustili na mjesec. To ne bi napravili da spuštanja nije bilo. Inače, Lunohod je prvi automat koji je "šetao" mjesecom, i sve ostalo ste u pravu, ali amerikanci su jedini slali ljude.
Over more than 10 years, Project Apollo involved 400,000 people working at major contractors such as Boeing, North American Aviation, Douglas Aircraft Company, IBM, Motorola and MIT University. Converted to today, the costs were 341 billion dollars and this is the main reason why 'we' didn't go back. After Apollo 11 there were 5 more other landings. Apollo 12 to 17 except 13 Kubrick? No film director is going to make the same film SIX times from the same set with bad camera equipment and only different actors. Also CGI didn't exist yet. Van Allen? Astronauts are protected by their spacesuits and by the metal shell of the rocket. Moreover, they fly shortly through the least strong belts. Why no stars? All films and photos were taken during daylight. Trying to get stars in a photo will result in an overexposed photo. Are all the data lost? No. The Apex tape recordings of the TV broadcast and telemetry were overwritten but all the 16mm films and photos are still in the NASA Archive. Can we still see the landingsites? Both the dual rover tracks and the footprints are clearly visible in the images, which were captured and beamed back by NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO).
@@maxsmith695 Dear Max, Radar Stations And Dish for Communications FROM Around The World Were Pointed Towards Apollo Staging Travels All The FKN WAY to The Moon. So You Think Only A Few People In One State in The USA Was Involved In Tracking This ENORMOUS Rocket? REALY???. That Indicates To Me THAT you Never Left The Tiny Village of 2 Square Miles You Live In... AND your Entire Schooling (all Grades) Occured in The Same 12'x'12' Class Room. That Is how your UNIVERSE of Knowledge is.... I'm Not Even convinced that You Can Gather up "some" Courage to go in the Town Next to the One "you" Live In... That Is HOW Small your Understanding of What The Mercury, Gemini, Appollo And Sky Lab Missions Were... Totally Utterly ClueLess. The FKN Entire World was Involved To Land Missions On Our Moon. If You Don't Realize THIS, Then You NEVER LEFT the Back Yard of the Home You LIved FFS!
Facts are important, not propaganda, today Americans can't get into orbit, so they could hardly have been to the moon 55 years ago and returned safely in 17 missions. Today, an American gets into orbit only thanks to Russia.
@@jol666jol After the last Apollo 17 mission it was decided to focus on scientific research in a low orbit around the earth, which meant that a rocket like the Saturn 5 was no longer necessary and therefore the Space Shuttle was developed and no, it is not designed to travel to the moon but could certainly go into orbit. After the Space Shuttle was retired, the Russians used it for a while, but in the meantime SpaceX has taken it over and they have started project Artemis, which will take us back to the moon. 17 missions? Only 8 missions have gone to the moon, of which 6 have landed.
@@ApolloKid1961 the space shuttle ended because it didn't deliver on what it promised, hellishly expensive and extremely unreliable, 14 carbons for about 160 missions, that's one dead astronaut for every 10 launches, the video also does not say that Von Braun was a Nazi criminal
"he flew over South America at night" It is suspicious but not strong evidence unless combined with other inconsistencies. Gagarin was not a geographer and may have confused one mountain for another.
Artemis is fantastic but for some reason it doesn't quite hold the allure Apollo had! My age obviously has something to do with that. This is a young person's game and I wish all people working on the Artemis, good luck and godspeed!
@@christopheryoder8292 Thats not what NASA or Elon or anyone is saying. The will is very strong but the tech is not there. imagine? How is THAT possible? China, Russia, India, Europe, Japan, everybody cannot land men on the moon and bring them back safely. WE DO NOT HAVE THE TECHNOLOGY. We never did. The moon is too much of a challenge. Danger beyond imagination. Lets see when they can do it again. They want to build a moonbase to get to Mars? Lets wait and see. Impossible in our lifetime. I will apologise when I am wrong.
*A FUNNY THING HAPPENED* WHEN NASA SENT NINE APOLLO MISSIONS OUT TO THE MOON eight successfully completed their missions, six of which landed two of their crew on the Lunar surface. Those were Apollos 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17 Now how about that !
The landing footage is actual and taken from a fixed camera over the LMP (Lunar Module Pilot’s) right side window. All 6 landing videos are available on RUclips. Pay special attention to 15 and 17. 15 touched down near an enormous canyon and 17 between huge mountains.
We already have live cameras watching Earth from a much better vantage point: geostationary orbit. Weather satellites take photos of the entire hemisphere every 10 minutes.
@@JordanST-n7r No, that’s not the reason. DSCOVR operates at 1.5 million km from Earth and takes regular photos. But the photos taken from geostationary orbit are of much higher quality: the closer you get the higher the resolution. We’ve launched more than 200 spacecraft that have left Earth orbit entirely. More than 30 successful missions to the moon including 8 manned ones, of which 6 landed.
Absolutely no one who claims that the Apollo Program was fake ever backs up their claims with any actual evidence. Most just "post & ghost". Perhaps you will be the first to provide some evidence. Take care.
There are 4 of the 12 astronauts that walked on the moon still alive. Buzz Aldrin Apollo 11 David Scott Apollo 15 Charlie Duke Apollo 16 Harrison Schmitt Apollo 17
@@Aurora666_yt "Never Went to the Moon," "You Talk About Liars" and "Big Time" are all low level indie rock bands on Spotify. Nothing whatsoever to do with this video or the Apollo missions.
I'm an American and had some despair when realizing the Ussr was winning the space race in the beginning, and although wanting to be the best I immediately recognized what that Astra naught from the soviet union must had felt when he became the first man to free float in outer space and his air suit swelled up and could not reenter his capsule. This would immediately produce a rushing surge of freight, and anxiety and dread calling for some drastic actions. In my younger years when I had been exploring and caving I had found myself on a incline squeezing myself threw a narrow pathway and had wedged myself immobile. I was stuck and the more I panicked the more I struggled and the worst these emotions were heightened. Even know these thoughts are causing heart palpitations and invoking anxiety of these past memories. It would not be until I had excused myself with my futile efforts that I would relax with despair and release all my air in my lungs in defeat , with this submission I relaxed and was able to reposition. Finger push and wiggle 1/2 inch in every push seemed like a life time within 5 minutes I was confident I would live. Im glad that Astro naught lived. I know the feeling in being alone before you die and you never know what you will do until faced with the very scenario nightmares are made of
Its more between 1969 - 1973 6 sequels of moon walks. Strange after /despite Safety First careful advancement They still made to MOON a year latter, and 2 on it! Miracle short feat.
Absolutely no one who claims that the Apollo Program was fake ever backs up their claims with any actual evidence. Most just "post & ghost". Perhaps you will be the first to provide some evidence. Take care.
@@robbedontuesday No I'm not sure... I'm taking a stab at a solution. I'm not instantly assuming it is fake. Are you sure you are not a harebrained conspiracy nut?
@@theeraphatsunthornwit6266 Most people know the moon landing is a real historical event. Your science denial conspiracy cult consists of very few weirdos who have no voice outside the internet.
@@Aurora666_yt yep, like most normal people know its a real event, and there's loads of evidence for it being real including PEOPLE WHO WATCHED IT HAPPEN, some people just cant understand and think that if they cant understand it its a lie, or they are told its a lie even though it isnt.
That is incorrect. Earth’s curvature is visible, even to the naked eye, from an altitude of 10 km. We have thousands of photos from the ISS that clearly show curvature.
Absolutely no one who claims that the Apollo Program was fake ever backs up their claims with any actual evidence. Most just "post & ghost". Perhaps you will be the first to provide some evidence. Take care.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
All the men from Mercury, Gemini and Apollo are some of my greatest heroes. They're the greatest pilots to ever live to alot of people... They certainly are in my book. The Crew of Apollo One will always hold a special place in my heart as well. I'm so grateful for their efforts aswell as all the Astronauts during that time.
takes nads of Iron to live in a diaper for months on end, me??, no way could I build the courage to soil my pants for weeks on end and still remain chirpy.
One of the better telling docs about going to the moon. Lots of nice high quality footage I never saw (or cannot remeber having seen before...). Thanks NASA for painstakingly filming everything!
I agree
Outstanding presentation
Well-researched and put together
Includes rare video footage
Watched Apollo 11 launch as a schoolboy at Woomera Rocket Range in South Australia. Less than 7 years later I was a shift tech at Orroral Valley tracking station outside Canberra and we supported the multiple ALSEP experiments installed on the lunar surface by Apollo astronauts.
People who believe the moon landings did not happen suffer grave mental problems, generally below par IQ, are often badly narcissistic and generally unhappy individuals. If they weren't so obnoxious one would really have to pity them. Although their self pity is generally enough.
I’m 72. USA. this brings back so many childhood memories
I often wondered why the incomplete and curtailed missions were ever considered "embarrassments". How could that be? They were doing things never done before!
This is one of the best documentaries I have seen. Lots of footage I have never seen before and I thought I had seen everything! Absolutely marvellous !
And someday, in the future, they may actually succeed in putting a human on the lunar surface.
I was there, I worked on the throttle control of the Descent engine final testing !
On landing on the Moon would the engine be heard as it was about to land as we do not hear any noise from any engines on the lamb. Just commentary. Why was that?? Rockets make lots of noise
What was the weight ratio compared to Saturn 5 only being tested without a payload of the lamb and extra fuel to take it out of orbit towards the moon and to have fuel to get off the moon?Like would it be Top heavy and if the Saturn 5 worked so good why did they stop using it? Never understood that how they carried a moon buggy as well surely the Saturn 5 would have be unstable on take off. With all that weight at the top hope someone can answer this then I can understand how they did it. Lot of payload and fuel at the top mmmm. Saturn 5 would get astronauts to the space station instead of using Russians rockets?? Surely ???so is there or was there a Cold War between the USA and Russia when we use their Rockets to get to the space station don’t seem any differences there ?? To me
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT OMG OMG OMG OMG THATS SUCH A W im obsessed with nasa stuff
@@jonnny8 Since there is no atmosphere on the moon, you would not hear any sound there, but inside the lunar lander you should be able to hear it and probably feel it too.
@@jonnny8 First of all, the Saturn 5 was designed to go to the moon. Using it just to go to the ISS is overkill. Much simpler rockets like the Falcon are much much cheaper.
There was quite a lot of testing before landing on the moon:
January 27, 1967 Fatal plugs-out test Apollo 1.
November 9, 1967 Unmanned test flight Apollo 4.
January 22, 1968 Unmanned test flight Apollo 5.
April 4, 1968 Unmanned test flight Apollo 6.
October 11, 1968 First manned flight Apollo 7. Testing of Command and Service module.
December 21, 1968 Apollo 8. First flight Saturn 5, First to the moon, First behind the moon.
March 3, 1969 Apollo 9. Practice with the LM around the earth.
May 18, 1969 Apollo 10. Practicing with the LM around the moon.
people who say this is fake is mocking the blood, tear, and sweat of all the engineers, technician, and all staff of this program.
@@sillybilly8028 : No, it's not. That's just uneducated people making things up because they feel less-than.
@@sillybilly8028 You wouldn't recognize reality if it hit you over your empty head.
The moon landings were FAKE AF! Get with the program, old fart!
This is fake and the NDA by all involved is the only thing that is mocking.
@@sillybilly8028 Real? Like your girlfriend's lips, eh?
Thank you for putting this up. I'm 71 & I watched all of this on my grandparents B/W TV back then in NC. Besides Apollo 11 I don't remember details. Now retired in N. Florida I have been to two Shuttle launches & only can dream of what it was like to watch some of the first manned rocket launches. Shalom
Oy!
I’m 72 and watched it all at home. My parents were interested in the space program
Wow thank you for uploading. While it seemed intermidable, it was relatively comprehensive as well.
Best documentary so far.
thank you so much for your true reporting, science, and generosity
Great document thsnks for sharing
@@lifesahobby The Apollo 11 crews were exposed to 1.67 mSv per second as they crossed the Van Allen radiation belt. This amounts to a total exposure of 1.8 Sv in 3 hours of travel through the radiation belt during the mission. Any exposure to 1 Sv or more, however, brings about fatal injuries. The radiation readings for the Apollo 11 astronauts’ skin of 0.18 rad, significantly, did not differ from radiation readings from missions restricted to low earth orbit.
Data clearly proves that the Apollo 11 astronauts were not sufficiently protected against radiation: Neither the spaceship nor the spacesuits contained lead.
Aluminum is ineffective against gamma and neutron rays. The calculated exposure of the Apollo crew was 1.8 Sv, an amount associated with nausea, vomiting, bone marrow changes, and 20% mortality. Surprisingly, no Apollo astronaut showed any ill effects from radiation exposure. These inconsistencies seem to reflect either possible over-estimation or under-reporting of the health hazards summarized in Safe Passage. Furthermore, these medical inconsistencies seem to highlight the surprising observations that the Apollo 11 astronauts did not show any signs of space sickness from microgravity upon their return to Earth.
Another great documentary. Thank you for posting.
Apollo 11 will always be THE flight of Apollo but to my mind - the Xmas 1968 flight of Apollo 8 into Lunar orbit was stunning in it's concept , audacity and execution .
Apollo 8 was awe inspiring.
Funny you say that. For me personally Apollo 8 was even greater than Apollo 11. I still shudder when I remember that "Go for TLI", sending man away from earth to another celestial boy for the first time ever. I was a young boy but I fully grasped the momentous importance of this event and the risks involved. Deep nostalgia for a now old man.
Apollo 10 was huge. And what a crew! All three would command a mission. Cernan flew in the LEM in lunar orbit twice and would be the last man from Apollo to walk on the moon. Stafford was extremely intelligent, the ultimate test pilot, and would eventually become the father of stealth aircraft development. And John Young, the Astronaut’s astronaut, would eventually be chosen to command both Apollo 16 and the first flight of the Space Shuttle.
To me the Gemini program is underrated. And because they had a enournous test schedule and was a mission full of firsts Apollo 9 is also underrated
Apollo astronauts are more enthusiastic when you ask them questions about Gemini rather than Apollo
Yes how can your underrated the first HEO feat. As #8 and then #10 are :(
I think it's more that it's largely unknown rather than underrated . Anybody with a clue knows how important Gemini was - rendezvous , EVA and honing techniques for working in 'zero-G' , long duration missions , not forgetting continued operational experience and discovery of excessive crumb with Cocoa Beach deli corned beef sandwiches.
@ hear hear
@@cronistamundano8189 I think it was Gemini that broke the Russian’s back and put us significantly ahead in the race. I completely agree with DrTWG that unknown rather than underrated applies. For those familiar with the maturation of the US space program during the 70s Gemini was huge. During an anniversary celebration for Apollo 10 I had the distinct pleasure of meeting many of the Apollo astronauts during a cocktail party. And of equal significance several of the flight directors including Glynn Lunney!
Most people referred to the progroam as "Gem en eee" even though most people say "Gem en eye". It's been said that the German engineers would say "Gem en ee" and the name stayed that way during thoughs days. Also, at 1:16:03 I believe that's Neil Armstrong's Omega Speedmaster that he's wearing on his left wrist. He never wore it on the moon, so Buzz Aldrin was the first person to wear his Speedmaster watch on the moon. It's been said that Neil left his watch hanging on the instrument panel because the built-in clock on the panel stopped working.
O well Some lament prononciation of LM with lem.... apparently ignorant to do so.
@@wildboar7473 Maybe they don't realize that originally, the LM was referred to as the LEM for the Lunar Excursion Module. It was later shortened to the term LM, or Lunar Module.
@@daffidavit no rather a anal antihoaxer of 20 years plus.... :)
deldelahaye3811 (parts....)
wildboar7473 More ignorance....the term LEM was dropped in 1967...The Apollo landers are always referred to as LMs ...pronounced LEM...but those who continue to use the acronym LEM just show they have little, or no in- depth, knowledge of the NASA Apollo missions. 😬
wildboar7473 Please pay attention....! The MIT quote is dated 1966. I very clearly pointed out that the name " LEM " was dropped NASA in 1967, although some sources say that the notice to change the name went out in June 1966...It is quite likely that the MIT program was made before that date...or they just used the old name LEM *because that was what the general public knew* ,, 🤒
The fact that some sources refer to " LM or LEM " is simply because many people do not know that the name was changed *early in the program* ..and the fact that LM is pronounced LEM does not help the willfully ignorant... 😝
The fact that other people use the term LEM is irrelevant and does not change the fact that the name was changed to LM over 50 years ago. And just because somebody referred to working on the original design of the LEMm as it was then called, *does not excuse the use of the wrong term now.* 🥵
It is not " VERY BAD " to call it the LEM now, it is just factually WRONG...and *when we are debunking conspiracy garbage we rely on getting the correct facts.. It is called attention to detail* - something conspiracy spouters continuously ignore.. 😵💫
@@daffidavit@daffidavit my thoughts exactly! When I was young (around age 10 or 11), we had this Encarta 95 (I think) Encyclopedia on the computer and I was very much interested in the space program after watching Apollo 13. The Lunar Excursion Module is one of the words I still remember clearly till this day after learning from that encyclopedia.
Finch brings great energy to 4ra events, really enjoying it.
I was in high school, in Lahore, Pakistan...I watched the landing in news...I still have my diary entry on this event
Was there any appreciable reaction or opinion in Lahore?!?
@@asifansari3430 and you, like my father, have a unique perspective, like anyone that was there to watch it.. you KNOW that those wacky internet moon-landing conspiracy theories have confused so many younger people, and I for one, think it’s important that you tell people of your experience. Most fairly intelligent people can distinguish the difference between internet garbage and verifiable facts, but there are FAR too many people that believe the conspiracies for the simple reason that they want to believe that they know something that makes them FEEL special. This “Dunning-Kruger effect” symptom is one of the things that is disturbing to see in the people we encounter in life, but I think it’s important that people that have personal experience that refutes the conspiracy garbage, speak up, even if some will ALWAYS find the conspiracies more fun than reality. This is unfortunately, just the world we live in, but keep up the good fight for intelligence! 😎
Спасибо за Историю!
The narrator says at 3:38 "Coast-to-coast, citizens were watching" the failed Vanguard launch of December 6, 1957. In fact, the launch was not televised live. An article on page 76 of the December 16, 1957 issue of the magazine "Broadcasting" says, "WTVT (TV) Tampa-St. Petersburg, Fla. aired 400 feet of film of the explosion of the Vanguard missile one hour and 50 minutes after the earth satellite burst into flames Dec. 6 at Cape Canaveral, Fla., 110 miles from the station. Roger Sharp, a WTVT newscaster, and a 2-man camera crew...covered the explosion from four miles away and rushed the film to WTVT by chartered plane. WTVT supplied prints for stations in New York, Oklahoma City, New Orleans, Montgomery, Louisville and Miami in time for newscasts that same day."
Got to admit, Finch's involvement in 4RA made me a regular. Can't miss out on his match insights!
The 60's, when people were smarter and anything was possible.
@@AkulaSpawn People in the 1960th loved their pot and believed anything!
1:08:12 this has been debunked. And if they did land.. the ascent motor was completely separate.
However, this was an excellent video and I learned some new things 👍.
I like how music change from USSR to US mood!
👍Facts are important, not propaganda, today Americans can't get into orbit, so they could hardly have been to the moon 55 years ago and returned safely in 17 missions. Today, an American gets into orbit only thanks to Russia.
@jol666jol
Copy/paste
Copy/paste
Copy/paste
At least you could ptetend to come up with some new mat'l...
Typical lazy, ignorant hoaxster.
🫵😆
Vanguard TV-3 bounced clear of the explosion and started transmitting, despite being damaged. It resides in the Smithsonian at the Udvar-Hazy annex.i Vanguard 1 is still up there, inert, but still trucking along at 60+ years.
Project Apollo is still the most amazing memory if my teenage years & probably America's greatest achievement. They changed history in a way that will be remembered 500, even 1000 years in the future - people will still remember that Neil & Buzz walking on the moon in 1969.
@@plunder1956 He walked the Moon in a Hollywood-studio directed by Stanley Kubrik🍏
awesome documentary. i honored all personal which are involved in successful mission
@@amarjeetprasad1450 It was a studio farse! Wake up!
@LarsGsanger = Idiot can't even SPELL 'farce'. Go back and take 7th grade again.
Lars: "It was a studio farse! "
58:20 I've always said that this is one of the most important photographs in human history, taken at a time of incredible instability on our fragile Earth..
The most important phrase in human history. The eagle HSS landed
"The result of an unprecedented surge in scientific and engineering activity with remarkable spin-offs… in less than 9 years the United States went from space amateur to technological hyperpower". That's proof of how humans could do amazing things, in a relatively short period of time, if they really put their mind to it. And that's why wise Jacque Fresco stated that we must put our mind to changing the socioeconomic organization system under which our society operates as we did to put a man on the moon. Watch "The choice is ours" documentary to learn about his proposal.
Brilliant!
The amount of brain rot and lack of critical thinking in this comment section is astounding
it's scary...
Yah there are allot of special people running around in here, I bet allot of them are bots. The rest are just the crazies with no brain and no life who wish they could be the next famous person but will work their jobs sweeping and mopping the floors.
@@danielecognome7501 And so are our current times. The US is facing its most critical "launch" come 2024 year end. May you vote with your heart and test your decision against what your mind knows.
They can’t understand it, so ‘it didn’t happen’. It’s quite incredible.
These are the folks that rot their brains on TikTok all day and haven’t read a book, perhaps ever. The same ones that ask me how to cook ramen noodles when their microwave doesn’t work.
Watching this again. Kudos to the USSR cosmonauts, NASA, and you Best Documentary folk. Well done.
@@therealzilch NASA is a factory of lies!
@LarsGsanger Prove it.😁
@ I’m not a huge fan of the ”prove it”-people but_I will say this: I now a hoax when I encouter one! The staged so called Moonlanding was ridiculously bad! NASA is all about telling blatened lies to humanity for the purpose of making us (human beings) feel insignificant before an endless big black, scary Universe that doesn’t really exist! So, back to the Moon_seeing the blue sky (on a sunny day) right through it should be enough, it’s transparent! The Moon’s face-off is not a landscape! The distinguished pattern is the rigidity of the natural plasma-moon. It does not reflect sunlight! It is cooler in Moonlight than in Moon-shadow, go measure!🍏
@@therealzilch Lazy’s not to be proved🍏
@LarsGsanger You don't see blue sky through the Moon, but rather in front of it. Plasma is amorphous, it has no mountains, craters, or shadows. And how do you explain the phases and lunar eclipses?
To the moon, Alice!
Honeymooners?
satanic lies
@@thrummer1953 Duh!
@@thrummer1953 🙂
loved the Honeymooners...
Excellent!
It appears that, for an astronaut, having drama with Mission Control is especially bad for your career, as illustrated by Mercury-Atlas 7 and Apollo 7.
Wally thought he could dictate the rules to Nasa, they all got what they deserved for disobeying orders; besides, he made a career out of he's "stubborn" cold.
Wally announced he’d retire after Apollo 7 but other 2 never flew but did ground staff duties.
@@briandunn6342 never heard that before, and it was made clear by Chris Kraft that the crew of 7 would never fly again due to disobedience.
Good documentary.
Who’s here on July 20th 2024?
He’d july 24 2024
@@maymaypoochhuh?
It's me,and I'm from AUSTRIA. 1969 I was 15 years old and until now i'm very impressed about the MOONLANDING.
July 26th 2024
@@Williamhyperion4einen Bauhelm will er, der Wilhelm Bauer 👷♂️
If you are reading some of the comments here , you will find so many people who lack conviction in their argument about humans not going to the moon . Thats why people argue , they want someone to do the homework for them.. until then they suffer the doubts .
This us what happens when you are given choices to study physics , organic chemistry and you say " its too hard " you end up never developing a mind with conceptual capacity .. and you might always pick the easy way from that point on .
Its just laziness to doubt and its crazy to argue with them .
If you had some guy running across ten lanes of highway, it would be really silly to run across the road with them telling them theyre doing something stupid .
So dont argue with them .. youll never change those who never took the ambitious subjects . Youll find behind them all is a lack of physics , science, objectivity , conceptual thought .
And that's why they rattle like they do .
Here to india .. with the first woman , here to christina cock , heres to the apollo program , vostok, gemini , and all the brave ones who risked it all to inspire us .
Gods speed .. 77 tons all the way m may the force be with you and may peace be with those who just dont know .
If US won this round of space race against China, do you think US will continue the space exploration?
@@zollen123
Please explain better your question
@@lifesahobby Yet, no human has ever walked on the moon. The only scary thing is that there are still people who believe it happened.
@lifesahobby Can't get past the Van Allen Belts, bud. Do you honestly believe anyone and everyone who knows that the landings were fake are simply too lazy, uneducated
@@lifesahobby
Can't get past the Van Allen Belts, bud. That's just the tip of the iceberg. Do you honestly believe anyone and everyone who knows that the landings were fake are simply too lazy, uneducated or lack the understanding of physics, science, etc....? Is that why there are scientists, engineers etc.... all over the world who are very educated that agree NASA faked the landings. What do you say to that? Wake up!
Any concerns with Static Discharge when Arms makes contact I recall incident with Hindenburg.
~~ From the day JFK made the challenge in 1962 to put men on the moon before the end of the decade - NASA basically had a blank check to make it happen - but they also had the engineering talent ( and the drive & the discipline ) to make it happen - only when they had to make Apollo 17 the final manned mission in 1972 were the economic realities taking hold - the space shuttle was supposed to be the cost-saving alternative - but it never was that. Now it's just all about putting more satellites in orbit - making collisions an ever-increasing danger - and of course space tourism - for rich folks ..
Very nice informatic ❤
56:17 56:42 56:53 58:05 1:00:49 1:17:18 I like that when filming flights from inside a spaceship, there is always a blue sky outside the window. There was always good weather in space lol
I know you're obviously trolling, but just in case you are new to general Space Science, or have read little on the matter ( I'm 52, so was educated at a time when you needed to read on subjects extensively, unlike today), let me try to explain.
The Blue Sky, as you call it, is apparent because the camera, or window, is looking DOWN at the earth below. The atmosphere of the earth, especially in Low Earth Orbit, always looks blue. If the camera was looking out into the blackness of space, you would see nothing. The astronauts would see stars, but the Camera, and by extension we the viewer, cannot resolve stars, so the sky looks black. Go outside tonight and snap off one pic of the sky and look at the image. You will see no stars. Maybe Venus, or the moon if its bright enough, but no stars. You need a long exposure of more than a second to see any stars. Some phones, on night mode, will do it automatically, but generally no.
@Hiram1000
"The Astronauts would see stars"?
Wonder why Neil Armstrong and Michael Collins couldn't see them while they went to the moon and back with Apollo 11.
Nor did others from Apollo 12 through 17!
THEIR own words!
Look into it!
@@matthewmcinnis9368Any time you have a significant light source, sun, interior lights, ambient light pollution, the light overwhelms the dim stars, plus your pupils adjust smaller and the stars become hidden, even in space. That’s why the astronauts could not see the stars, even on the surface of the moon, given its reflective surface.
@RichardinNC1 my point was there are different answers from the Astronauts who went to the moon regarding seeing stars or not.
Why the discrepancies between those involved in the same "mission"?
A correction in Gemini 3 flew March 23 1965 but video script says July.
In Gemini 4 closing Ed White hatch after the EVA was the problem.
The music is to loud…!
1:08:20 There it is again. I think that's a MYTH. I cannot IMAGINE that crew trying to make an unauthorized landing. Your whole life is building to this moment, and you are going to BLOW it by performing some stunt, for which neither they nor the guys on the ground had made any plans. I think that's utter BS. I'm sure they short-fueled the LM because the extra fuel was simply unnecessary. On space missions, you're always looking for ways to save whatever weight you can, and I'm sure that was just one more of those cases.
Gotta improvise sometimes, you overly skeptical post-truth zombie.
@@00govan00 Bite me. Even if you were being sarcastic.
NASA is still dreaming that their Lie would come true AFTER China landed her astronauts on the Moon .
Dream on NASA. Prices are going up and American GDP is crashing !
There was more fuel than was specified and Armstring knew it.
He was in command.
Heck if it were me in that situation I'd have gone for it too.
@@villagegirl68 Pay attention. My comment was about Apollo 10, not Apollo 11.
The most important phrase in human history
@@DanSheil What phrase?
still just a dream...
Actually no. Been 55 years since the first moon landing, try to keep up with the rest of us.
@@Aurora666_yt nothing living can leave Earth... other than in Hollywood.
the rest of you are as deluded as the Government intends you to be.
@@Aurora666_yt hollywood is not real...
@@traveler142 False. Man has been traveling to low earth orbit and beyond since the 1950s. Try to keep up with the rest of us. Nobody else's fault you're stuck in the past.
@@Aurora666_yt Hollywood has you people turned into little Moonbats.
He 4ra IPL lottery is wild! tried my luck today, and it was such a thrill. hope to win big! these events are making the IPL season unforgettable.
These moon landing deniers are nuts. 😂
The worst part is that most of them are American.
So are you who believe in this crap.
Hoaxnuts
The moon landings were fake as f..k Grow some brain cells.
@@JordanST-n7r You could be right...
great doc thanks
JFK said the end of the decade. In this entire video the guy talks about 12-31-1969 being the deadline. However the deadline (decade) is actually 12-31-1970.
That's not how decades work. Were you home-schooled? 🙄
please explain how it works.
The calendar was created by Catholic Romans who used Roman Numbers. The thought of “0” zero was not considered.
The first year was “1”. There was never a 01-01-0000, instead it was 01-01-0001.
Therefore a decade starts at every 20_1 and last for 10 years.
@@roccorossetti7579 You WERE home-schooled. JFK's statement about reaching the moon "by the end of the decade" referred to the 1960s, meaning before the start of 1970. This aligns with the common understanding of a decade as a span of 10 years starting from a year ending in 0 and ending in a year ending in 9 (e.g., 1960-1969). The general modern usage defines decades this way. A pseudointellectual often engages in discussions in a way that seems knowledgeable but lacks true understanding or depth.
@@roccorossetti7579JFK said the “60’s” which meant the 60’s, NOT 1970
@@respectdawildo_danjones508 No where did JFK say 60's.
Only the need to overtake the USSR forced the USA to pump such huge funds into the lunar program
You mean - pump so much money into the lunar frauds.
If US won this round of space race against China, do you think US will continue the space exploration?
@@zollen123 гонка китая? у китая другие заботы
Only the need to stay ahead of the US forced the USSR to pump huge finds into their lunar program.
I read back a ways and didn't see anything about it, but there is a boomerang shaped object on the right side spinning from bottom to top at 57:10 there abouts. it's not hard to see. looks out of place but I guess there was junk up there already.
That was an Australian spacecraft.
Lost count how many times ive watch this Nasa to the moon .
A bit help from aussie space honeysuckle creek You got look it up this was a new area of tech that change the world .
Aussies should also know about the 64-meter radio telescope at Parkes, New South Wales, which was responsible for receiving the signals from most of the 2 ½ - hour Moonwalk.
Foir a good, almost true, story and a good laugh, watch THE DISH! Love it!
thank you
❤ Слава Советской космонавтики ❤
❤
4 запуски Н1,і всі провальні😂😂😂.Який Слава?😅
@@jakepopalo Советский Луноход в ноябре 1970 первым прилунился на Луне и забрал на Землю содержимое лунной поверхности. Советский космонавт первым в космос полетел, Советский спутник первым был выведен на орбиту
@@sarkissati1217 в 69году Аполлон11 прилунился,два астронавта погуляли по Луне и уже вернулся с Луны,доставил десятки кг.реголита.
А ты тычешь свой лохоход🤣🤣🤣
А фейк о "полете" Гагарина своей бабушке расскажи.
Все космические достижения ссср благодаря украинцу С.П.Королеву ,группе немецких ученых создавшие А4( ФАУ2)
Где доказательства "полета "
Гагарина!?Их нет,нет ни видео ,нет ни Гагарина...🤣
@@sarkissati1217Sovjeti su čestitali amerikancima kad su se spustili na mjesec. To ne bi napravili da spuštanja nije bilo. Inače, Lunohod je prvi automat koji je "šetao" mjesecom, i sve ostalo ste u pravu, ali amerikanci su jedini slali ljude.
What is the music starting at 48:00?
It's used way too much ,
Over more than 10 years, Project Apollo involved 400,000 people working at major contractors such as Boeing, North American Aviation, Douglas Aircraft Company, IBM, Motorola and MIT University.
Converted to today, the costs were 341 billion dollars and this is the main reason why 'we' didn't go back.
After Apollo 11 there were 5 more other landings. Apollo 12 to 17 except 13
Kubrick? No film director is going to make the same film SIX times from the same set with bad camera equipment and only different actors. Also CGI didn't exist yet.
Van Allen? Astronauts are protected by their spacesuits and by the metal shell of the rocket. Moreover, they fly shortly through the least strong belts.
Why no stars? All films and photos were taken during daylight. Trying to get stars in a photo will result in an overexposed photo.
Are all the data lost? No. The Apex tape recordings of the TV broadcast and telemetry were overwritten but all the 16mm films and photos are still in the NASA Archive.
Can we still see the landingsites? Both the dual rover tracks and the footprints are clearly visible in the images, which were captured and beamed back by NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO).
80,000 people can be claimed to make a car. If they fake drive the car onto a football field, do all 80,000 need to witness it?
@@maxsmith695 Dear Max, Radar Stations And Dish for Communications FROM Around The World Were Pointed Towards Apollo Staging Travels All The FKN WAY to The Moon. So You Think Only A Few People In One State in The USA Was Involved In Tracking This ENORMOUS Rocket? REALY???. That Indicates To Me THAT you Never Left The Tiny Village of 2 Square Miles You Live In... AND your Entire Schooling (all Grades) Occured in The Same 12'x'12' Class Room. That Is how your UNIVERSE of Knowledge is.... I'm Not Even convinced that You Can Gather up "some" Courage to go in the Town Next to the One "you" Live In... That Is HOW Small your Understanding of What The Mercury, Gemini, Appollo And Sky Lab Missions Were... Totally Utterly ClueLess. The FKN Entire World was Involved To Land Missions On Our Moon. If You Don't Realize THIS, Then You NEVER LEFT the Back Yard of the Home You LIved FFS!
Facts are important, not propaganda, today Americans can't get into orbit, so they could hardly have been to the moon 55 years ago and returned safely in 17 missions. Today, an American gets into orbit only thanks to Russia.
@@jol666jol After the last Apollo 17 mission it was decided to focus on scientific research in a low orbit around the earth, which meant that a rocket like the Saturn 5 was no longer necessary and therefore the Space Shuttle was developed and no, it is not designed to travel to the moon but could certainly go into orbit. After the Space Shuttle was retired, the Russians used it for a while, but in the meantime SpaceX has taken it over and they have started project Artemis, which will take us back to the moon. 17 missions? Only 8 missions have gone to the moon, of which 6 have landed.
@@ApolloKid1961 the space shuttle ended because it didn't deliver on what it promised, hellishly expensive and extremely unreliable, 14 carbons for about 160 missions, that's one dead astronaut for every 10 launches, the video also does not say that Von Braun was a Nazi criminal
"he flew over South America at night"
It is suspicious but not strong evidence unless combined with other inconsistencies. Gagarin was not a geographer and may have confused one mountain for another.
From dream to dream
4ra makes every IPL match thrilling My brother knew it was the best.
An empty vessel makes the most noise .
Now I wonder how this compares to the current Artemis missions.
The budget.
@@ApolloKid1961 Yeah I think that's a big one!
Artemis is fantastic but for some reason it doesn't quite hold the allure Apollo had! My age obviously has something to do with that. This is a young person's game and I wish all people working on the Artemis, good luck and godspeed!
Bring back 1960s technology I guess.
🤥
Y'kno? Lol.
I think it's less an issue of technology and more an issue of will.
@@christopheryoder8292
I was being sarcastic. The US has never landed humans on the moon in the 60s - 70s.
🇺🇲
@@christopheryoder8292 Thats not what NASA or Elon or anyone is saying. The will is very strong but the tech is not there. imagine? How is THAT possible? China, Russia, India, Europe, Japan, everybody cannot land men on the moon and bring them back safely. WE DO NOT HAVE THE TECHNOLOGY. We never did. The moon is too much of a challenge. Danger beyond imagination. Lets see when they can do it again. They want to build a moonbase to get to Mars? Lets wait and see. Impossible in our lifetime. I will apologise when I am wrong.
@@moeluv
...and you clearly dropped out of school at an early age.
Thats ok....the world needs ditch diggers too.
what's the background music during Soviet rocket scenes
*A FUNNY THING HAPPENED* WHEN NASA SENT NINE APOLLO MISSIONS OUT TO THE MOON eight successfully completed their missions, six of which landed two of their crew on the Lunar surface. Those were Apollos 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17 Now how about that !
A time when we the human race, thought anything was possible. Sadly those days are long gone.
One day the truth will surface. And those whom lied will hold their heads down in shame.
Maybe you will believe the 🌎 is round
@richardblanke5521 I know the world is round moron. Use that insulting rhetoric on someone like yourself....useless.
@@nxtgen2b416 You think the moon landing was faked. You're no different.
"raisin barriers were impossible" Tell it to the Polaris Dawn astronauts who crossed into the Van Allen Belts last week.
He was also the first russian to poop in space .....😂
Buzz Aldrin is the first to urinate while standing on the moon.
Love the “cue the Soviet music” portions. My favorite part. The sound of tyranny at its finest
Elon said that his company will have humans on the moon by 2023,that didn't happen, smh
Musk is a homophobic snake oil salesman.
SO?
Eh Space and Rockets are hard. It's still phenomenal that SpaceX can land and reuse the Falcon 9. Something no one thought was possible.
1:16:08 Can someone confirm if that is real moon footage, or the a fake moon made for the simulators?
The landing footage is actual and taken from a fixed camera over the LMP (Lunar Module Pilot’s) right side window. All 6 landing videos are available on RUclips. Pay special attention to 15 and 17. 15 touched down near an enormous canyon and 17 between huge mountains.
@@martinmendez695 It’s only one, the f a k e 0 n e⚠️
@@martinmendez695 No, no one can because it was f a k e🙂
The music ruins it.
Watching IPL on 4ra makes it more exciting. Bonuses make it better.
SO SPACE IS A CARTOON.
@@harrymacdonald858 Kubrik didn’t do cartoon!
Charlie Brown and Snoopy.
Subsequent crews were asked to choose names with a little more gravitas. Today there would be licensing issues.
There should be at least a live camera on the moon.
People believe in politicians and leaders, they would believe every lie served.
We already have live cameras watching Earth from a much better vantage point: geostationary orbit. Weather satellites take photos of the entire hemisphere every 10 minutes.
@@Hobbes746 And the reason is they can't go further than that.
@@JordanST-n7r No, that’s not the reason. DSCOVR operates at 1.5 million km from Earth and takes regular photos.
But the photos taken from geostationary orbit are of much higher quality: the closer you get the higher the resolution.
We’ve launched more than 200 spacecraft that have left Earth orbit entirely. More than 30 successful missions to the moon including 8 manned ones, of which 6 landed.
@@Hobbes746 Now I am persuaded.
I have more confidence in science.
At 51:22 that is not a Saturn -1B, that is a block 1 Saturn. Get it correct, guys, or leave it out. So much for "best documentary".
LIARS!!!
Absolutely no one who claims that the Apollo Program was fake ever backs up their claims with any actual evidence. Most just "post & ghost". Perhaps you will be the first to provide some evidence. Take care.
На данное время осталось всего 2 человека из тех кто ходил по другой планете. Печально, но что делать? Ждем следующих.
There are 4 of the 12 astronauts that walked on the moon still alive.
Buzz Aldrin Apollo 11
David Scott Apollo 15
Charlie Duke Apollo 16
Harrison Schmitt Apollo 17
Trusting my bets more at 4RBT now that Finch is in the squad. Feels like batting with a safety net!
Never went to the moon - you talk about Liars - Big Time ...
Evidence?
@@Aurora666_yt
"Never Went to the Moon," "You Talk About Liars" and "Big Time" are all low level indie rock bands on Spotify. Nothing whatsoever to do with this video or the Apollo missions.
Idiot
I'm an American and had some despair when realizing the Ussr was winning the space race in the beginning, and although wanting to be the best I immediately recognized what that Astra naught from the soviet union must had felt when he became the first man to free float in outer space and his air suit swelled up and could not reenter his capsule. This would immediately produce a rushing surge of freight, and anxiety and dread calling for some drastic actions. In my younger years when I had been exploring and caving I had found myself on a incline squeezing myself threw a narrow pathway and had wedged myself immobile. I was stuck and the more I panicked the more I struggled and the worst these emotions were heightened. Even know these thoughts are causing heart palpitations and invoking anxiety of these past memories. It would not be until I had excused myself with my futile efforts that I would relax with despair and release all my air in my lungs in defeat , with this submission I relaxed and was able to reposition. Finger push and wiggle 1/2 inch in every push seemed like a life time within 5 minutes I was confident I would live. Im glad that Astro naught lived. I know the feeling in being alone before you die and you never know what you will do until faced with the very scenario nightmares are made of
it appears you learnt naught in your English lessons at school...
KENYA TO LAND ITS FIRST MAN ON THE MOON BY 2032
Bad Joke
usituaibishe buda delete
You mean the UK, it means the same thing!
Its more between 1969 - 1973 6 sequels of moon walks. Strange after /despite Safety First careful advancement They still made to MOON a year latter, and 2 on it! Miracle short feat.
First to be sick..... Americans got sick, thou stay longer, and far deepspace.
#8 Astronauts pass the 90's, very nice dangerous health hazard :)
and no return for 52 years and counting.
No reason to return.
14:55 Enos, AKA chimp 81.....10 times the intellectual capacity of all of the moon landing deniers combined
说一个谎言，你需要无数个谎言去掩盖他
That's exactly why denying the Moon landings is not tenable.
I dont think this is the original documentary. Think it was clipped and was re narrated. Regardless good video
Never happened
Absolutely no one who claims that the Apollo Program was fake ever backs up their claims with any actual evidence. Most just "post & ghost". Perhaps you will be the first to provide some evidence. Take care.
@@BuzzC-t3l Never because it was all fake!!
58:20 Please excuse my ignorance, but should not the Moon surface be as lit as the Earth itself?
It could be the difference between reflectivity of the Moon's grey soil and the Earth's white clouds.
@@aliensoup2420
Are
You
Sure
???
@@robbedontuesday No I'm not sure... I'm taking a stab at a solution. I'm not instantly assuming it is fake. Are you sure you are not a harebrained conspiracy nut?
@@aliensoup2420 yes, I am sure I am not.
It is as lit as the Earth. The camera exposure is making it look darker. Everything depends on the camera exposure.
Are u serious in 2025 still people believe NASA wtf
@@Awwe12675 ❤️
As nore and more people now know the truth, the ending to this shame to all mankind could be near
@@theeraphatsunthornwit6266 Most people know the moon landing is a real historical event. Your science denial conspiracy cult consists of very few weirdos who have no voice outside the internet.
@@Aurora666_yt yep, like most normal people know its a real event, and there's loads of evidence for it being real including PEOPLE WHO WATCHED IT HAPPEN, some people just cant understand and think that if they cant understand it its a lie, or they are told its a lie even though it isnt.
Gemini 10 was not launched in December of 1966, but July of 1966.
Now instead of science in the White House we have baggies of cocaine.
And Hunter sitting in the White House meetings.🙄
The Trump admin was chock full of drugs. I think that's why they're so unpleasant and detached from reality. Their brains are literally swiss cheese.
Or lists of political targets that a small child is obsessed with taking revenge on.
Settle now children
Trump a convicted criminal
That Apollo rocket sound was the best crackle, rumble rocket sound that man ever made.
Noone sees curvature from low Orbit..
That is incorrect. Earth’s curvature is visible, even to the naked eye, from an altitude of 10 km. We have thousands of photos from the ISS that clearly show curvature.
@@Hobbes746 he's talking about when the lead singer of Hermans Hermits Peter Noone went up to the ISS...
Of course they do. Where did you get that from?
@@Hobbes746
No its not..
Who gave u that crazy idea..a
@@nickfraser2434 no they really dont..
You watch to much Nasa tv
The '60's US technology was hundreds of years ahead of its time. ASTRONAUTS ARE GODLIKE HUMAN BEINGS. USA TECHNOLOGY IS STUNNINGLY IMPRESSIVE.
All lies
Absolutely no one who claims that the Apollo Program was fake ever backs up their claims with any actual evidence. Most just "post & ghost". Perhaps you will be the first to provide some evidence. Take care.
I wonder how Vonbrown broke his arm in that famous clip of him with that giant cast on his arm
Von Braun had a car accident. His driver didn't survive.