...feminist historian... It IS worth considering that one should NOT use a political framework to do good scholarship. Its ok to bring a womans sensibility into the work. BUT, to be a "feminist" is to bring gender politics into scholarship. ...thats wrong. Because it is biased. To be a good scholar, one puts the work up front and the findings are carefully framed so as to represent themselves, and not somone's politicized view of them.
@@christianguild780 the conversation they have is frustrating because often it IS laced with political language. They don't even know they are doing it. ...and it gets worse because the theological points are often only partially arrived at.
Critical scholarship will necessarily bring in modalities that are challenging, they are not necessarily correct and sometimes do not have relevance, but they are part of the apparatus we have. Maybe in the future we will have more poetic modalities that resolve rather than point out tension, but we have the clay we have.
By bringing the eminents in Syriac Christianity, URHO does a great thing. ThankYou
This is the best ever! Thank you so very much.
Thanks for making this esoteric topic accessible! Well done!
Please include subtitles admin. I want to translate my languange
...feminist historian...
It IS worth considering that one should NOT use a political framework to do good scholarship.
Its ok to bring a womans sensibility into the work.
BUT, to be a "feminist" is to bring gender politics into scholarship.
...thats wrong. Because it is biased.
To be a good scholar, one puts the work up front and the findings are carefully framed so as to represent themselves, and not somone's politicized view of them.
Watch around 34 minutes in.
@@christianguild780 the conversation they have is frustrating because often it IS laced with political language.
They don't even know they are doing it.
...and it gets worse because the theological points are often only partially arrived at.
@@someguyoverthere3275 Thank you for pointing it out. I couldn't agree more. Chorbishop Seely Beggiani won't make such a mistake.
Critical scholarship will necessarily bring in modalities that are challenging, they are not necessarily correct and sometimes do not have relevance, but they are part of the apparatus we have. Maybe in the future we will have more poetic modalities that resolve rather than point out tension, but we have the clay we have.