@@RoundShadesfascism is not nazism though, fascism isn’t inherently racist, some even opposed and tried to kill hitler like julius uhl which got ernst rolm and strasser blamed and killed, rolm was gay as well, and the original nazi party was around 13% jewish in membership
Can't wait for part 3! This has been an amazing series so far that has taught me a lot about different political ideologies and has helped me understand them more.
@@ThePaintExplainer The content is great since you don't give a biased opinion and give an explanation that makes sense while also not being tremendously long.
I really appreciate how unbiased and non-judgmental/condoning you are about this. Most political content creators nowadays just scream the same old "My side is objectively good, your side is complete and utter evil" type of rhetoric. Some suggestions I'd recommend for part 3 would be Demarchy/Sortition and Epistocracy.
It can never be un-biased, but at least I can agree that he (defining by a male narator voice) doesn't engage in childish behavior of saying "This is good, This is an Abomination, etc" everyone has a bias and we can't expect someone to say something without bias, but we can look for someone respectfull, and this video creator is extremely polite and respectfull.
I really love the descriptions of the ideologies and am keen to see the next episodes of the series but personally I do think the illustrations have a very clear bias. I agree with some of these biases, and some I don’t. They are biases though and they are there. Please do not make the mistake of thinking anything can be completely free of perspective
@@andreyhenriquethomas9554 I don't know. Of course it's impossible to personally be unbiased, but I don't see how it's impossible to word things in a way that don't make something good or bad.
social democracies would be most countries in Europe (at least North, Central Europe) like Germany invented the Social market economy also called Rhine capitalism. Germany, Sweden, Netherland++ are Social Democracies
@@Janoipodd since Northern Europe ranks highest in economic freedom in the world. The reason it has social programs is because oil, and they have actually followed studies on prisons and education and implemented common sense reforms (like not abolishing the merit system) to make their schools and prisons more efficient. They have the lowest reoffending rate and finland has the best schools in the world
@@arthurmorgan1550LOL Social democracy and freedom together????? Have you even been to Germany??? Its the most unfair and anti liberal country I know and its known for its social democracy…
I really hope that you read this comment. I study political science, and by chance stumbled across this video. I really enjoyed the two, as they gave a really good overview across these very diverse ideologies. Very straight forward and precise. I am really looking forward for the third part. Instant subscription, your videos in general are great! Greetings from Germany :D
In spanish, the term for "lemon socialism" is "República bananera", banana's republic, as US intervention in central America was largely influenced by banana plantations interests around the 19th century
Im loving this series, i just feel like it should be pointed out that not everyone who calls themselves part of these ideologies, go by these concepts, and that like all things in society, these concepts (save for like, the historical ones maybe) are changing and growing with the groups that support them, and they are in the most part, not homogenous in its beliefs, besides pointing that out, its an amazing series, thank you for takin the time to make it.
So someone might say they're one of these ideologies but then at the same time taking bits and pieces of another ideology and morphing it into something new?
@@Expugnaturum Do I really need to bust out the Coconut Island analogy to demonstrate that so long as the transaction is coercive it can't be voluntary, or do I just call you a ree'tard and move on?
@AngelJamieJulesMusic collectivists always believe that hierarchies are based on tyranny, not competence. This is a clear reflection of these kinds of mindsets, which can only understand human interaction with coertion. Corporations can only replace the State if they have the monopoly of violence, which has never happened. That's just a delusional futurible used to justify your tyrant views.
@AngelJamieJulesMusic collectivists believe that hierarchies are based on tyranny, but this is not true, as they become unstable. Instead, they are based on competence. This is a clear reflection of the collectivist pathological mindset which considers that any human interaction is conceived in coertion. Hierarchies are not only necessarily bad, but also necessary to achieve a great variety of common goals. Corporations replacing States require the monopoly of violence, which hasn't ever happened. That's just a futurible used to justify tyrannic ideas.
This is great! Please keep uploading more! I've been using this to write things in my register as I'm young and trying to expand my knowledge. Thank you!
I find it fascinating how you can make something like this so clear and understandable, yet so basic and resumed for people like me, I can now understand politics even more!
Part 3 plz very much loving this series. Might I recommend going into the different kinds of conservatism there is since you’ve not covered that in detail so far. Like social conservatism, national conservatism, liberal conservatism and so on. Then you can go into the center right ideologies more.
I would like to clarify something, where Marxist-Leninists and Anarcho-Communists actually disagree is not on the end goal, but on the methodology to get there. Marxists-Leninists want to go through a socialist phase of transition to communism, Anarcho-Communists want to tear the system down immediately and jumpstart right into communism bypassing the socialist economic phase of the transition to communism. Both want the same end goal though. A classless, currencyless and stateless society. All agree on Marx’s final definition of communism. Anarcho-Communism isn’t an end goal, just a different methodology for getting to that same point of ‘communism’ that Marxist-Leninists want.
I’m practice however, anarcho communism results in chaos and a power vacuum that will be filled by another ideology whereas Leninism results in the vanguard party never transitioning to communism and keeping an iron grip on power
@@dustydinoface I agree with you that anarchism just results in a power vacuum, but your take on Marx’s idea of a transitional socialist state isn’t quite correct… The assertion that Marxism-Leninism inevitably results in a vanguard party never transitioning to communism and keeping an iron grip on power misrepresents Marxist-Leninist theory. The vanguard party is meant to act as the leading organ of the proletariat, guiding the state during the dictatorship of the proletariat to prevent capitalist restoration and to advance toward the withering away of the state, a key component of achieving communism. This criticism often stems from a common misunderstanding of the dialectical process and the necessary stages of revolution, which include the building and fortifying of socialism as a step towards a classless, stateless society, rather than an end in itself. It’s also very difficult to wither away the people’s government because of *foreign imperial interference* and there’s plenty of examples of that over the last 100 years. Cuba, Korea, Vietnam, tons of Central and South American and African CIA backed coups and so on. We already live under a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie where less than 765 people owning all the infrastructure in the world.
Marx criticized the idea of a government-less society. The State, to Marx, was the tool by which those in power enforced private property, and therefore a stateless society, to Marx, was a society without private property, not one without a government like Anarchists mean it.
@@dancegregorydance6933 you meant to say Marxism-Leninism. communism is a form of societal organization, not a form of social change. the places you mention didnt (by definition) have communism, as they revolved around a powerful state, controled by one party ( following Marxism-Leninism) instead of an absence of a state, as communism would have. also, super important, these places had state-conroled capitalism. the means of production belonged to the state, not the workers. it doesnt matter if N.Korea or China calls itself communist, as in reality it doesnt enforce any of the fundamental practices of communism or socialism.
Just subscribed this afternoon after watching part 1 and now you've posted part 2 of this series. These are easy to understand at a base level and particularly helpful for me to take a quick look since I have political science as one of my subjects. Also love to see your videos on various topics. Great job and thanks.
Many dystopian fictions include elements of anarchocapitalism and corporatocracy as both combined abolish all means of limiting private governance and ultimately trade in personal liberties for unlimited corporate liberty
The current government systems of the world right now are already dystopian as is. In Anarcho-Capitalism there is no monopoly of violence, so the cyberpunk dystopia argument does not apply. Because markets discourage war and monopolies. The only reason it sounds crazy at face value is because you have not really looked into the ideas behind the ideology yet.
@@DavidLopez-dd1hxmarkets do not discourage monopolies and war lol WTF???? You know one dude accounted for like 3% of the United States economy and 90%+ of oil production before the gov said hey maybe we should do a little regulation, right?? 💀💀
@@DavidLopez-dd1hxOn what basis does the market discourage war and monopolies? You can't just speak something into existence, at least provide an argument for your case or else this is just lazy thinking. Of course monopolies can be caused by the market, capitalist supporters pride themselves in the fact that under capitalism there's competition. "Competition drives innovation" is a commonly used argument, yet nobody ever mentions that in competitions there's winners. Those winners are the monopolies, and the free market ends up with these monopolies no matter how much or how little the goverment is involved. And to win in these competitions capitalists will go to great lenghts, it's not a foreign concept that people fight and cause wars over resources. And the whole point about their not being monopoliesed violence? You don't think that the ruling class can monopolies violence, when they are much richer than the average person by a long shot?
Another good video, I actually didn't think this was going to become a series because in the first one all TPE said at the end was "I will be making similar videos" but wasn't thinking it would be about this topic again. I am glad it is a series now and there are still so many more ideologies to explain; best of luck.
Great video, thanks a lot! Some ideologies I‘d like to see in part 3 would be the Nordic model, democratic socialism, utopian socialism, theocracy and technocracy, just some ideas.
Utopian socialism is very vauge but its just, socialism will solve everything. Nordic Model, social democracy. Democratic Socialism, its what we now days call original social democracay before social democracy abandoned socialism for capitalism. (well this can be very vauge too as democratix socialism can also be revolutionary, and wants a revolution to establish a socialist democracy, like all other socialist ideologies) short explainations are nit good for politics
Nordic model is just social democracy with less central government rules. One example is how there's no minimum wage, that is instead negotiated by unions.
After all ideologies are done, can you make a diffrences table video comparing similar and polar opposite ideologies(and at the end of that series just compare each and every single ideology in a MASSIVE table that you make in excel)
It really tickles me that the video does a cold open and zooms right into Anarcho-Communism. It makes me think of a Command & Conquer faction selection screen xD This is great; I love how succinct, unbiased and clear the definitions used are.
After watching both of these videos I am surprised at how neutral your stance is. As a Libertarian, I felt like my views were fairly and accurately expressed.
The only thing I'm missing in these videos is a clarification of 'left' and 'right'. The terms are used throughout the video, but never clarified. There's a clear distinction between the economical left-right spectrum and the cultural left-right spectrum. I even believe there's a theory that uses a third axis, but I forgot what that one was about.
I didn't know the difference till my 30's. Now I really don't know the difference. The difference, is the distinction and the difference is the heart of the issue. Polarization over issues that have a middle ground.
Maybe you could do many of the forms of monarchism, as we in the monarchist community all have very differing views, all the way from anarcho-monarchism to absolutists
@@SwedishDrunkard5963 tbh im not entirely sure, but I think it's similar to a feudal system, where every community is left to do their own thing for the most part, but then there's a king for a larger area to protect the communities. idk it's kind of a joke anyways
@@SwedishDrunkard5963 basically monarchism with no nobility and the King let's the locals do as they want 90% of the time, he acts as a guardrail to protect the status quo in an otherwise anarchist society and protects the kingdom against negative influences that might pervert society. In France their is a green anarcho-monarchist party called the Black Lily (le Lys Noir) described like this : Taking up the defense of ideas of royalism from Action Française such as decentralized absolute monarchy or the Coup de Force, this movement however moves away from Maurrassian orthodoxy and is in line with monarchist dissidents such as the Cercle Proudhon, the Cagoule terrorist group, Joseph Darnand as well as Georges Bernanos, pamphleteer and royalist philosophers such as Pierre Boutang. However, although claiming to be theoreticians and activists of the ultra-right, this movement also claims to be populist movements (Poujadism), revolutionary movements (Khmer Rouge), anti-industrial thinkers like Jacques Ellul, the terrorist Theodore Kaczynski, degrowth, and more broadly the post-situationist authors of the Encyclopedia of Nuisances as well as the ultra-left of Tiqqun and the autonomous movement
I discovered your channel about 7 hrs ago and watched the first part of this video then😂 I was already wishing for more videos like this. Thank you😊 Love from Nigeria❤
I'm more of a libatarian / anarco capitalist. Buy whatever I want start my own business without government intervention without stupid taxes and regulations that would normally shut me down. Under anarcho capitalism everyone has the opportunity to be a king of their own company empire.
@arthurmorgan1550 who said it was gonna be done on earth? Without government bs slowing us down we can travel to other planets and take those resources instead.
@boxedtoast with no limits to scientific research and stupid laws and taxes we can finally colonize other planets. We can solve actual problems and build a galactic utopia where the people are truly free.
Discovering my political stance was always a puzzle until your insightful explanation clarified the distinctions between social liberalism, social democracy, and social capitalism. Your balanced approach to ideologies without taking a hardline stance is truly commendable. This series is a gem, simplifying complex and polarizing concepts with clarity and neutrality. The latest paint explorer video not only raised the bar but shattered it, leaving me in awe. Thank you for making intricate ideas crystal clear and presenting them in such a captivating and unbiased manner!
Marxism/Lenism and the whole "dictatorship of the proletariat" just sounds like another form of authoritarianism to me, this ideology never appealed to me and now I have more insight as to why after watching both vids, thanks.
I was worried there would be political bias to these videos, especially considering how a lot of other channels that cover historical or political topics can be. Safe to say that I was wrong. Keep up the good work!
List of ideologies you could include in Part 3: National-Bolshevism Longism Dengism Neo-Fascism Neo-Nazism Black Nationalism Pan-Arabism Masculism (inverse of Feminism) National Libertarianism Kleptocracy Strasserism Kraterocracy These are just my suggestions, feel free to use any of them, maybe even credit me for the ones that you use from this comment if you like!
One thing I think you should add if you talk about other ancom adjacent ideologies is that ancoms, syndicalists, egoists, ect. typically believe in a non-centralized revolution, as opposed to one lead by a vanguard party or something similar.
Why add that, that would be a more personal touch to it. No completely uncentered revolution will happen, it's very unlikely if we look at statistics history shows us - and even then, this video shortly and fittingly describes different standings and political associations, anarchist ain't differentiated from "anarchist that isn't constantly marching with many other anarchists". Absolutely zero need to add this in.
You could have also added pan-nationalism, when people of a whole race or recognized cultural group want to form a larger nation based on their shared culture similar languages and idea that they hold each others self interest in higher standing than if they were members of a country with other different nations. Since there were many different German identities, the unification of Germany back then could be considered pan-nationalism, and the old and maybe new idea that Russia should be the leader of the Slavic world and incorporate or protect other Slavic nations is also a big one.
I dont really see the difference between nationalism and pan-nationalism in this sense. I mean if I am a Hungarian nationalist and meet a Brazilian nationalist, there arent any things we would inherently agree on either. So on that note, nationalism wouldnt be classified as an ideology either. You could argue that we would agree, that a nation is important, but then you could also argue, that pan-nationalists would agree, that there are groups of people, who should be part of a larger nation and that this large nation is more important than the fragmented smaller nations.
Great video! Just some ideas for part three: radical feminism, post-colonial feminism, intersectionality, de-growth (or dedevelopment), sustainable development, structuralism, modernisation theory, good governance, institutionalism
@@crowposlanets I can see ancom as a good utopia, but yeah, there's no good way to get there, I used ancap because I was once an ancap when I was 12yo.
Honestly as a polsci nerd who knows very well how political ideologies are treated in the internet i brace for impact while watching this before any explanation of a more complex or divisive ideology, but honestly you manage to present all of them very well, of course, *some* nuances are missed but its very informative for people who don't want to go super indepth into them, so good job, kudos to you! Though i do mention that in SocCap you should've at least mentioned Rhinish Capitalism as an example, it felt like a very quick and rushed explanation.
@@SwedishDrunkard5963 eh disagree, even as someone who follows the ultraleftist definition of socialism i feel like he did in explaining them. As for nationalism i feel like the problem is that he condensed it too much, ultranationalism and universal nationalism should've been their own thing but aside from that it was fine
I am an anarcho-socialist and you explained my ideology without any bias at all, and surprisingly without going into details about the difference delegation and representation or how state and hierarchy are abolished or the different branches of thought in both revolution and horizontal organisation which are all things that are a must to mention in a comprehensive explanation which turns essays into 40 min videos. Nicely done, keep the good work. Still your explanation of neo liberalism is a little bit lacking since you just explained the "chairholder" version of it. And your explanation marxism is better replaced with "state-socialism" since it perfectly defined the latter while well marxism and differs depending on the type of society, revolution it's extremely vast what you did is akin to describing neolibralism as capitalism. For example Marxism- leninism says that the dictatorship of the proletariat is only a "necessary" transitional period according to lenin in order to reach a stateless moneyless but not hierarchy free society, while marxism leninism Maoism differs only in what is called the systematic resolve of contradictions, the mode of revolution and the status of lump-prols yet die hard MLs say that MLMs are third worldist traitors and die hard MLMs say that MLs are hypocrite imperialists. One letter yet a load of history and differences. The difference between marxism and socialism and which ideologies belong or don't to each branch is a very very long one. Books have been written by intellectuals of each ideology to answer where they fit in the grand tree of ideology. In conclusion besides the grave mistake of mislabeling marxism and some minor mistakes in other ideologies your video is great especially since it's just 10 minutes.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
I really like this series, it makes such confusing and polarising concepts clear as day. All the while being presented simple and neutral.
That's exactly the goal! Glad you found it useful!
@@ThePaintExplainer Well you did an excellent job! I hope you're proud of yourself, because you should be!
@@ThePaintExplainerthanks for making this kind of content, the countryballs ideology spectrum is largely in comics not a full video
@@ThePaintExplainer Doug Demuro's hips are super wide
I agree
I've never heard someone explain ideologies without taking a hardline towards certain ideologies. Well done!
The only one he seemed biased against was nazism but that's understandable.
I don't know, he was pretty anti Nazi in his defining of fascism. I'm okay with that though, sucks for Nazi sympathisers though.
@@RoundShadesfascism is not nazism though, fascism isn’t inherently racist, some even opposed and tried to kill hitler like julius uhl which got ernst rolm and strasser blamed and killed, rolm was gay as well, and the original nazi party was around 13% jewish in membership
@@RoundShadeseverything should suck for Nazi sympathisers though
@@mortagon1451to be fair it doesnt sound biased, its literally what it is lol
I love how well explained this is, and you don’t let your own political ideologies get in the way of your explanation!
BEST PAINT EXPLORER VIDEO YET!!!
THE BAR WQAS ALREDY THRU THE ROOF BUT U JUST SMASHED THE ROOF WHOOOOOO
Sup checkmark
Aren't you the guy that did the no sleep challenge?
Can't wait for part 3! This has been an amazing series so far that has taught me a lot about different political ideologies and has helped me understand them more.
Glad you're liking it!
@@ThePaintExplainer The content is great since you don't give a biased opinion and give an explanation that makes sense while also not being tremendously long.
@@ThePaintExplaineryou got third way wrong, third positivists used to be called third way and they were syndicalists
How is that unbiased when he didn't mention zionism 😂
@@ThePaintExplaineris there gonna be a part 3?
I really appreciate how unbiased and non-judgmental/condoning you are about this. Most political content creators nowadays just scream the same old "My side is objectively good, your side is complete and utter evil" type of rhetoric. Some suggestions I'd recommend for part 3 would be Demarchy/Sortition and Epistocracy.
Mostly if you try to understand something thats not capitalism
i mean some political ideologies are objectively evil
@@ramoneliastejada4216 Marxism, Lennism, Jacobism, Reactionarism, Integralism, Corporatocracy,.
@@ALE199-ita aaannd... Where are the Nazis?
@@ALE199-itafrom what I heard from the video jacobism is not that bad
Another unbiased, factual informative video! It’s like a breath of fresh air!
❤️
It can never be un-biased, but at least I can agree that he (defining by a male narator voice) doesn't engage in childish behavior of saying "This is good, This is an Abomination, etc" everyone has a bias and we can't expect someone to say something without bias, but we can look for someone respectfull, and this video creator is extremely polite and respectfull.
I really love the descriptions of the ideologies and am keen to see the next episodes of the series but personally I do think the illustrations have a very clear bias. I agree with some of these biases, and some I don’t. They are biases though and they are there. Please do not make the mistake of thinking anything can be completely free of perspective
@@andreyhenriquethomas9554 exactly there is no such thing as something man-made being "unbiased". A good video regardless.
@@andreyhenriquethomas9554 I don't know. Of course it's impossible to personally be unbiased, but I don't see how it's impossible to word things in a way that don't make something good or bad.
Was always confused between whether whether I was a social liberal, social democrat or social capitalist. Now I get it. Thanks!
social democracies would be most countries in Europe (at least North, Central Europe) like Germany invented the Social market economy also called Rhine capitalism.
Germany, Sweden, Netherland++ are Social Democracies
A lot of those terms overlap. For example, social democracy is liberal and capitalistic.
Do more research than an 8 minute RUclips video
@@Janoipodd since Northern Europe ranks highest in economic freedom in the world. The reason it has social programs is because oil, and they have actually followed studies on prisons and education and implemented common sense reforms (like not abolishing the merit system) to make their schools and prisons more efficient. They have the lowest reoffending rate and finland has the best schools in the world
@@arthurmorgan1550LOL Social democracy and freedom together????? Have you even been to Germany??? Its the most unfair and anti liberal country I know and its known for its social democracy…
I really hope that you read this comment. I study political science, and by chance stumbled across this video. I really enjoyed the two, as they gave a really good overview across these very diverse ideologies. Very straight forward and precise. I am really looking forward for the third part. Instant subscription, your videos in general are great! Greetings from Germany :D
Still no bias, still no agenda, still no straw-men, still just education
i love how simple yet objective each one is explained. already excited for the next video.
In spanish, the term for "lemon socialism" is "República bananera", banana's republic, as US intervention in central America was largely influenced by banana plantations interests around the 19th century
I've been looking forward to this, glad your explanations are still great.
Thanks!
Im loving this series, i just feel like it should be pointed out that not everyone who calls themselves part of these ideologies, go by these concepts, and that like all things in society, these concepts (save for like, the historical ones maybe) are changing and growing with the groups that support them, and they are in the most part, not homogenous in its beliefs, besides pointing that out, its an amazing series, thank you for takin the time to make it.
So someone might say they're one of these ideologies but then at the same time taking bits and pieces of another ideology and morphing it into something new?
Anarcho-Capitalism be like: "NO GODS AND NO MASTERS!... except my boss"
Which is chosen voluntarily.
@@Expugnaturum Do I really need to bust out the Coconut Island analogy to demonstrate that so long as the transaction is coercive it can't be voluntary, or do I just call you a ree'tard and move on?
@AngelJamieJulesMusic the typical false dichotomy of the mediocre. The alternative is working for yourself or starting your own business.
@AngelJamieJulesMusic collectivists always believe that hierarchies are based on tyranny, not competence. This is a clear reflection of these kinds of mindsets, which can only understand human interaction with coertion.
Corporations can only replace the State if they have the monopoly of violence, which has never happened. That's just a delusional futurible used to justify your tyrant views.
@AngelJamieJulesMusic collectivists believe that hierarchies are based on tyranny, but this is not true, as they become unstable. Instead, they are based on competence. This is a clear reflection of the collectivist pathological mindset which considers that any human interaction is conceived in coertion. Hierarchies are not only necessarily bad, but also necessary to achieve a great variety of common goals.
Corporations replacing States require the monopoly of violence, which hasn't ever happened. That's just a futurible used to justify tyrannic ideas.
This is great! Please keep uploading more! I've been using this to write things in my register as I'm young and trying to expand my knowledge. Thank you!
Glad you're liking it! ❤️
I find it fascinating how you can make something like this so clear and understandable, yet so basic and resumed for people like me, I can now understand politics even more!
Can't wait for part 3! I'm not into politics however it's very interesting to see the different types of political ideologies
i really enjoy how you just start the video instead of telling me to subscribe and throwing a sponsor 5 seconds into the video
Excellent job, I'm glad you use my suggestion first, thank you for hearing my requests
Thanks for the idea!
Part 3 plz very much loving this series.
Might I recommend going into the different kinds of conservatism there is since you’ve not covered that in detail so far. Like social conservatism, national conservatism, liberal conservatism and so on. Then you can go into the center right ideologies more.
I would like to clarify something, where Marxist-Leninists and Anarcho-Communists actually disagree is not on the end goal, but on the methodology to get there. Marxists-Leninists want to go through a socialist phase of transition to communism, Anarcho-Communists want to tear the system down immediately and jumpstart right into communism bypassing the socialist economic phase of the transition to communism.
Both want the same end goal though. A classless, currencyless and stateless society. All agree on Marx’s final definition of communism. Anarcho-Communism isn’t an end goal, just a different methodology for getting to that same point of ‘communism’ that Marxist-Leninists want.
I’m practice however, anarcho communism results in chaos and a power vacuum that will be filled by another ideology whereas Leninism results in the vanguard party never transitioning to communism and keeping an iron grip on power
@@dustydinoface
I agree with you that anarchism just results in a power vacuum, but your take on Marx’s idea of a transitional socialist state isn’t quite correct…
The assertion that Marxism-Leninism inevitably results in a vanguard party never transitioning to communism and keeping an iron grip on power misrepresents Marxist-Leninist theory. The vanguard party is meant to act as the leading organ of the proletariat, guiding the state during the dictatorship of the proletariat to prevent capitalist restoration and to advance toward the withering away of the state, a key component of achieving communism. This criticism often stems from a common misunderstanding of the dialectical process and the necessary stages of revolution, which include the building and fortifying of socialism as a step towards a classless, stateless society, rather than an end in itself.
It’s also very difficult to wither away the people’s government because of *foreign imperial interference* and there’s plenty of examples of that over the last 100 years. Cuba, Korea, Vietnam, tons of Central and South American and African CIA backed coups and so on. We already live under a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie where less than 765 people owning all the infrastructure in the world.
Marx criticized the idea of a government-less society. The State, to Marx, was the tool by which those in power enforced private property, and therefore a stateless society, to Marx, was a society without private property, not one without a government like Anarchists mean it.
In reality communism has only ever ended in a tyrannical vanguard party a la the USSR, China, North Korea, Vietnam.
@@dancegregorydance6933 you meant to say Marxism-Leninism. communism is a form of societal organization, not a form of social change. the places you mention didnt (by definition) have communism, as they revolved around a powerful state, controled by one party ( following Marxism-Leninism) instead of an absence of a state, as communism would have. also, super important, these places had state-conroled capitalism. the means of production belonged to the state, not the workers. it doesnt matter if N.Korea or China calls itself communist, as in reality it doesnt enforce any of the fundamental practices of communism or socialism.
Being that I just tapped on your channel after the algorithm gave me your biases video, starting with "Anarcho-Communism" was a mental flashbang
thanks for your work on part 2!
Just subscribed this afternoon after watching part 1 and now you've posted part 2 of this series. These are easy to understand at a base level and particularly helpful for me to take a quick look since I have political science as one of my subjects. Also love to see your videos on various topics. Great job and thanks.
Now, I can clearly understand what is Georgism, thank you for the explanation !
@square3356It's extremely relevant today, I would say that rent-seeking and land hoarding are more relevant issues today than in the 19th century
Anarchocapitalism sounds like a terrifying dystopia
Its generally the setting for many corpo dystopias (like Cyberpunk, for example)
Many dystopian fictions include elements of anarchocapitalism and corporatocracy as both combined abolish all means of limiting private governance and ultimately trade in personal liberties for unlimited corporate liberty
The current government systems of the world right now are already dystopian as is. In Anarcho-Capitalism there is no monopoly of violence, so the cyberpunk dystopia argument does not apply. Because markets discourage war and monopolies. The only reason it sounds crazy at face value is because you have not really looked into the ideas behind the ideology yet.
@@DavidLopez-dd1hxmarkets do not discourage monopolies and war lol WTF???? You know one dude accounted for like 3% of the United States economy and 90%+ of oil production before the gov said hey maybe we should do a little regulation, right?? 💀💀
@@DavidLopez-dd1hxOn what basis does the market discourage war and monopolies? You can't just speak something into existence, at least provide an argument for your case or else this is just lazy thinking. Of course monopolies can be caused by the market, capitalist supporters pride themselves in the fact that under capitalism there's competition. "Competition drives innovation" is a commonly used argument, yet nobody ever mentions that in competitions there's winners. Those winners are the monopolies, and the free market ends up with these monopolies no matter how much or how little the goverment is involved. And to win in these competitions capitalists will go to great lenghts, it's not a foreign concept that people fight and cause wars over resources.
And the whole point about their not being monopoliesed violence? You don't think that the ruling class can monopolies violence, when they are much richer than the average person by a long shot?
Another good video, I actually didn't think this was going to become a series because in the first one all TPE said at the end was "I will be making similar videos" but wasn't thinking it would be about this topic again.
I am glad it is a series now and there are still so many more ideologies to explain; best of luck.
Great video, thanks a lot! Some ideologies I‘d like to see in part 3 would be the Nordic model, democratic socialism, utopian socialism, theocracy and technocracy, just some ideas.
Utopian socialism is very vauge but its just, socialism will solve everything.
Nordic Model, social democracy.
Democratic Socialism, its what we now days call original social democracay before social democracy abandoned socialism for capitalism. (well this can be very vauge too as democratix socialism can also be revolutionary, and wants a revolution to establish a socialist democracy, like all other socialist ideologies)
short explainations are nit good for politics
@@SwedishDrunkard5963 Democratic Confederalism?
Nordic model is just social democracy with less central government rules. One example is how there's no minimum wage, that is instead negotiated by unions.
Loves the video. Very informative! Just in depth to Get a grasp of more intricate ideologies
Finally I can understand these things you sir earned another subscriber
I swear man you're like a breath of fresh air plesase keep up the good work.
After all ideologies are done, can you make a diffrences table video comparing similar and polar opposite ideologies(and at the end of that series just compare each and every single ideology in a MASSIVE table that you make in excel)
Hmmm... 🤔
this is a great idea!
that would be extremely time consuming
Honestly, you are doing a good job, not half baked, not overly cooked, just the perfect temperature
I found this very useful and I would love this series to continue! ❤
Excellent series! You explained everything clearly and didn't made propaganda of one over the other.
Thanks for covering Georgism and including us in the thumbnail!
Welp, I'm quite early... Didn't know there's going to be a part 2 for this.
After watching this, now I'll be waiting for Part 3.
Coming soon!
Finally a video that explains ideologies so well done thank you for this video man.
I'm blown away dude, it takes a genius to explain something so complex so simplified
What's complicated? There's a common theme here, the people that make the rules are at the top. Simple.
Really looking forward to a Part 3! In particular, itching to see Libertarian Socialism covered.
finally a objetive series where ideologies are treated objetively and with no propaganda
I absolutely love the lack of obvious bias in these, it's just pure explanation, and that's exactly what you need from this kind of video
I would love to have a more detailed video on the individual ideologies.
For example a 10 minute video just explaining neoliberalism in more detail.
Idk, do you guys want that? 🤔
@@ThePaintExplainer maybe more like a 20 minute video covering a group of similar ones?
@@ThePaintExplainer Yeah do every ideology for like 10 minutes in like a 2 hour video, I'll watch it in full, that watch time🤩
@@MaxTheLazyCat same
@@MaxTheLazyCat but it would be more profitable to split them into individual videos
Precise, informative, simple and straight-up to the point, I have to subscribe to this channel
You explain these to well, I question my political side.
It really tickles me that the video does a cold open and zooms right into Anarcho-Communism. It makes me think of a Command & Conquer faction selection screen xD
This is great; I love how succinct, unbiased and clear the definitions used are.
After watching both of these videos I am surprised at how neutral your stance is. As a Libertarian, I felt like my views were fairly and accurately expressed.
Another banger from you, I like how unbiased you are when making these videos
Guys which one you like most
Georgism
Cyberocracy
Syndicalism
I really like your videos (especially this series),they are one of the best on RUclips
The only thing I'm missing in these videos is a clarification of 'left' and 'right'. The terms are used throughout the video, but never clarified. There's a clear distinction between the economical left-right spectrum and the cultural left-right spectrum. I even believe there's a theory that uses a third axis, but I forgot what that one was about.
I didn't know the difference till my 30's. Now I really don't know the difference. The difference, is the distinction and the difference is the heart of the issue. Polarization over issues that have a middle ground.
Cant wait for every Neurological disease in 7! Seriously tho this is awesome what your doing. And hope you keep a pace from making this fun for you.
Maybe you could do many of the forms of monarchism, as we in the monarchist community all have very differing views, all the way from anarcho-monarchism to absolutists
what the fuck is anarcho monarcism, pls tell me.
like how can something be with out a hiarchy and have a monarchy, how!??!?
@@SwedishDrunkard5963 tbh im not entirely sure, but I think it's similar to a feudal system, where every community is left to do their own thing for the most part, but then there's a king for a larger area to protect the communities. idk it's kind of a joke anyways
@@Sesadre thats not anarchism in any way, that just sounds like communitarianism with a king
@@SwedishDrunkard5963 like I said, im pretty sure it's a joke
@@SwedishDrunkard5963 basically monarchism with no nobility and the King let's the locals do as they want 90% of the time, he acts as a guardrail to protect the status quo in an otherwise anarchist society and protects the kingdom against negative influences that might pervert society. In France their is a green anarcho-monarchist party called the Black Lily (le Lys Noir) described like this :
Taking up the defense of ideas of royalism from Action Française such as decentralized absolute monarchy or the Coup de Force, this movement however moves away from Maurrassian orthodoxy and is in line with monarchist dissidents such as the Cercle Proudhon, the Cagoule terrorist group, Joseph Darnand as well as Georges Bernanos, pamphleteer and royalist philosophers such as Pierre Boutang.
However, although claiming to be theoreticians and activists of the ultra-right, this movement also claims to be populist movements (Poujadism), revolutionary movements (Khmer Rouge), anti-industrial thinkers like Jacques Ellul, the terrorist Theodore Kaczynski, degrowth, and more broadly the post-situationist authors of the Encyclopedia of Nuisances as well as the ultra-left of Tiqqun and the autonomous movement
So unbiased it’s refreshing, you cleared up one of the biggest misconceptions with Anarchism at the beginning.
if feudalism is not in part 3...
I discovered your channel about 7 hrs ago and watched the first part of this video then😂 I was already wishing for more videos like this. Thank you😊 Love from Nigeria❤
I'm more of a libatarian / anarco capitalist. Buy whatever I want start my own business without government intervention without stupid taxes and regulations that would normally shut me down. Under anarcho capitalism everyone has the opportunity to be a king of their own company empire.
What about worker and environmental protection?
@arthurmorgan1550 who said it was gonna be done on earth? Without government bs slowing us down we can travel to other planets and take those resources instead.
@@angryfoxzd5233bro is tryna recreate lethal company 💀
@boxedtoast with no limits to scientific research and stupid laws and taxes we can finally colonize other planets. We can solve actual problems and build a galactic utopia where the people are truly free.
@@angryfoxzd5233Considering that pfp I would highly doubt that 'business' of yours.
Discovering my political stance was always a puzzle until your insightful explanation clarified the distinctions between social liberalism, social democracy, and social capitalism. Your balanced approach to ideologies without taking a hardline stance is truly commendable. This series is a gem, simplifying complex and polarizing concepts with clarity and neutrality. The latest paint explorer video not only raised the bar but shattered it, leaving me in awe. Thank you for making intricate ideas crystal clear and presenting them in such a captivating and unbiased manner!
Which one are you?
Marxism/Lenism and the whole "dictatorship of the proletariat" just sounds like another form of authoritarianism to me, this ideology never appealed to me and now I have more insight as to why after watching both vids, thanks.
It just means that the workers run the country, bootlicker.
@@priest.damner literally. Person watches few seconds Cliff Notes definition of Marxism and thinks they know all about it.
@@priest.damner You aint convincing anybody to do more research with that kinda attitude
@@doodoo2065 You never said I was wrong.
Succinct, unbiased, and easy to follow. I love it.
This video helped me recognized that I'm either a Classic Liberal or Neo Liberal. Thanks! Very helpful.
I love that PolCompballs are making a comeback.
You forgot sillyism :(
How are the masses supposed to know how to be silly 😢
yesss this channel finna blow up
I was worried there would be political bias to these videos, especially considering how a lot of other channels that cover historical or political topics can be. Safe to say that I was wrong. Keep up the good work!
It is not unbiased just apolitical
Tue use of words tones and simplification of certain ideologies make it so
nice vid bro
List of ideologies you could include in Part 3:
National-Bolshevism
Longism
Dengism
Neo-Fascism
Neo-Nazism
Black Nationalism
Pan-Arabism
Masculism (inverse of Feminism)
National Libertarianism
Kleptocracy
Strasserism
Kraterocracy
These are just my suggestions, feel free to use any of them, maybe even credit me for the ones that you use from this comment if you like!
Another great video! Keep doing what you're doing brother man. Education is key to progress.
as a crypto-neo-anarcho monarchist with Chinese characteristics I am offended that you didn't represent my ideology
Keep at this. You're gonna blow 100%. Good luck
Thanks ❤️
As a classical liberal, I approve 👍🏻
Wow. No ads?!
Can’t believe videos like this still exist!
i shall share this channels to all my friends to watch now.
One thing I think you should add if you talk about other ancom adjacent ideologies is that ancoms, syndicalists, egoists, ect. typically believe in a non-centralized revolution, as opposed to one lead by a vanguard party or something similar.
Why add that, that would be a more personal touch to it.
No completely uncentered revolution will happen, it's very unlikely if we look at statistics history shows us - and even then, this video shortly and fittingly describes different standings and political associations, anarchist ain't differentiated from "anarchist that isn't constantly marching with many other anarchists".
Absolutely zero need to add this in.
Keep these up! You have perfect pacing!
You could have also added pan-nationalism, when people of a whole race or recognized cultural group want to form a larger nation based on their shared culture similar languages and idea that they hold each others self interest in higher standing than if they were members of a country with other different nations. Since there were many different German identities, the unification of Germany back then could be considered pan-nationalism, and the old and maybe new idea that Russia should be the leader of the Slavic world and incorporate or protect other Slavic nations is also a big one.
Pan-nationalism isn't an ideology. 2 pan-nationalists from different parts of the world wouldnt inherently agree on anything.
I dont really see the difference between nationalism and pan-nationalism in this sense. I mean if I am a Hungarian nationalist and meet a Brazilian nationalist, there arent any things we would inherently agree on either. So on that note, nationalism wouldnt be classified as an ideology either.
You could argue that we would agree, that a nation is important, but then you could also argue, that pan-nationalists would agree, that there are groups of people, who should be part of a larger nation and that this large nation is more important than the fragmented smaller nations.
Pan-nationalism is in principle just nationalism, just with the belief that the nation is a larger, more loosely connected group.
There was always an overarching German identity - Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation
I don’t think pan nationalism is a thing. However as a pan nordism I can say that is a thing where we support one unified Nordic country.
this channel is gonna be so great
I feel like a lot of these need a caveat relating to some of the difficulties people have found in implementing them in the real world.
Great video! Just some ideas for part three: radical feminism, post-colonial feminism, intersectionality, de-growth (or dedevelopment), sustainable development, structuralism, modernisation theory, good governance, institutionalism
Ayyy soc dems represented wooo
this series will gonna blow up high.
Anarcho Capitalism is probably the most effed up one here. Its teleology is full corporate power over all aspects of life.
Thanks for including more types of anarchy :)
He had like 1 more type of anarchism...
TPE getting political again
Thanks for make his kind of content, is pretty useful.
I Love your videos
I love polcompball lmao. I swear we need to keep these videos going every now and then.
6:11 FREE REAL-ESTATE🤫
Such great explanations: THANKS!!!
I believe we can all agree that Anarcho-Capitalism is just dumb.
I believe we can all agree that the outcome of all branches of anarchism will be the same and so, you shouldn't have limited your criticism to ancap
@@crowposlanets I can see ancom as a good utopia, but yeah, there's no good way to get there, I used ancap because I was once an ancap when I was 12yo.
@@staff4226 It's impossible, it would quickly devolve into warlord led tribes and eventually emperors would emerge.
@@Eagle3302PL Bro what, what you said made absolutely no sense
@@crowposlanets i don't agree
Bro it took you 3 weeks to get 60k subscribers. This has to be some kind of recured, keep it up my dude.
Pretty sure MrBeast could get that in a day
@@Angel_559_ mrbeast is trash.
Another reminder that the further right, the better
Honestly as a polsci nerd who knows very well how political ideologies are treated in the internet i brace for impact while watching this before any explanation of a more complex or divisive ideology, but honestly you manage to present all of them very well, of course, *some* nuances are missed but its very informative for people who don't want to go super indepth into them, so good job, kudos to you!
Though i do mention that in SocCap you should've at least mentioned Rhinish Capitalism as an example, it felt like a very quick and rushed explanation.
I felt disapointed in nationalism and all the socialist ideologies
@@SwedishDrunkard5963 eh disagree, even as someone who follows the ultraleftist definition of socialism i feel like he did in explaining them.
As for nationalism i feel like the problem is that he condensed it too much, ultranationalism and universal nationalism should've been their own thing but aside from that it was fine
@@Post-Ioooo I also follow the extreams in the left movment but I still felt it in some way just not enugh
I don't think I've ever subscribed as quick to a RUclips channel before
Great video! Thank you
This gives me Casually Explained vibes, love it!
I am an anarcho-socialist and you explained my ideology without any bias at all, and surprisingly without going into details about the difference delegation and representation or how state and hierarchy are abolished or the different branches of thought in both revolution and horizontal organisation which are all things that are a must to mention in a comprehensive explanation which turns essays into 40 min videos.
Nicely done, keep the good work. Still your explanation of neo liberalism is a little bit lacking since you just explained the "chairholder" version of it. And your explanation marxism is better replaced with "state-socialism" since it perfectly defined the latter while well marxism and differs depending on the type of society, revolution it's extremely vast what you did is akin to describing neolibralism as capitalism. For example Marxism- leninism says that the dictatorship of the proletariat is only a "necessary" transitional period according to lenin in order to reach a stateless moneyless but not hierarchy free society, while marxism leninism Maoism differs only in what is called the systematic resolve of contradictions, the mode of revolution and the status of lump-prols yet die hard MLs say that MLMs are third worldist traitors and die hard MLMs say that MLs are hypocrite imperialists. One letter yet a load of history and differences.
The difference between marxism and socialism and which ideologies belong or don't to each branch is a very very long one. Books have been written by intellectuals of each ideology to answer where they fit in the grand tree of ideology.
In conclusion besides the grave mistake of mislabeling marxism and some minor mistakes in other ideologies your video is great especially since it's just 10 minutes.
i really appreciate these videos
Great video! I recommend eco-anarchism and technocracy for part 3
Once again, not a hint of bias either way. Just pure facts. Keep up the good work
this is my new fave page