I doubt the extra 60mah would matter but this come to show how nobody can beat snapdragon which I find pretty stupid that Google persists on keep using their tenser g soc
@@thealex232323apple clearly beat snapdragon though? they use much smaller battery’s (around 4200 mAh) and still sometimes come on top with their chips.
@denischiosa4496 I feel like google is putting it at its current price for max profit to then price the phone where it was supposed to be and call it a discount.
If only the price of pixel was lower, it'd have been acceptable. But at that price its competing directly with apple and samsung. And no where it is near them performance wise with ufs 3.1 along with having a huge difference in battery life.
Pixel need to chill their ass with that pricing, and they'll make a big W. Not a lot of people gonna spend 1K for a tensor G4, even tho we have[ _been promised_ ] 7 years of updates. 899 for the 9 Pro XL, 729 for the 9 Pro, and 669 for the 9. That is a *noice* deal
@@billzkustomzThe way this usually works is the people who can afford to buy the new flagship phone, use it for maybe 3 years and then pass it on to a relative who can't afford a new phone or to one of their children. It's not usually one person using the phone for all that time.
@@DerangedScout yeah but that's lil bit more acceptable as Samsung is also more powerful. Apple builds their own chip on their software so it's easier for them to make everything run smooth while consuming less battery. But there is a new battery tech out there that is smaller and keeps for juice. Let's see when the newest Samsung's and iPhones will build them in their phones.
@@emin62bek More powerful? 15PM won in the speed test. The speed tests he conducts includes apps optimized for most phones. (Not sure why my last comment was deleted)
It was honestly quite impressive to see the Google performing well into the 10 hour mark. At least it is improving, but needs more work if it wants to catch up to Samsung and Apple.
Yo, the S23 Ultra battery, when it came out last year, was just as good as the S24 Ultra's. Samsung's really stepped up their battery game over the years. As always, awesome video!
Im a Pixel use and will say that Google needs to have the basics (screen, camera, battery, charging, build) down to a T if they plan on sticking to the 'simple everyday' route. Its not a powerhouse, so they need to makesure everything else is immaculate so that the purchase and price is justified.
They also use archaic ufs 3.1 storage on the Pixel 9 series which will not age well at all. It will not be too long before advanced demanding apps will have this device staggering all over the place. People don't realise what they are buying here. It is slow by many midrange device standards. It's pricing is daylight robbery.
I'm using Pixel 9 pro XL for the last 2 weeks and the battery life is fantastic. I'm getting a minimum of 8 hours screen on time on an average and 9.5 hours being the highest with 10% left. All this happened along with 24 hours of total usage. So I'm not worried about this comparison as I'm quite happy with its performance. I don't game much so I'm not worried about that as well. The price? Yeah it could have been a little cheaper but I am a happy customer. PS: I'm not supporting just because I spent moneey on it but because the battery life is actually good!
The S24 Ultra is down 3/4th it's life cycle, just saying. Waiting for Apple to release it's iPhone 16 Pro Max, would love to see some more efficiency gains..
You don't know if it's been used and charged for the past 7 months though, it may have just been placed in storage and charged 5-10 times. Lithium-ion batteries can also last you 2 years before you start noticing differences in battery life.
@@PrimePixelRUclips by life cycle, I meant the product cycle, indicating the new S25 Ultra is around the corner, I used the wrong word, apologies for that...
@@PrimePixelRUclips 20-80 charging can make lithium batteries last up to 4 years, a good BMS chip can make the battery last by 1 year extra added ontop. Keeping the phone below 40 celsius, helps it last as well. My old Xiaomi is 3.5 years yet I got away with using only 55% the whole day with an hour recording at 1080p, 4h on screen.
I have a OnePlus 12 and my girlfriend has an s24 ultra. We both love our phones and neither one of us ever worry about running out of battery. I used to have a google pixel 6 and even while using battery saver the battery life was horrible. It drained like crazy, and after that experience I will never buy another google pixel device at least until they swap away from their exynos based tensor chip.
the only thing I can think of is the S24U has been out since February and has had 6 months worth of software updates to help optimize things (and it seems like Samsung releases an update every 2 weeks) whereas the Pixel 9 series has only been out for a couple weeks and they haven't fully optimized it yet.
I had the S22 Ultra... 8 Gen 1 was a beast I know, but in battery life againts my S24 Ultra this last one has a Great battery life. I'm happy with it 😊 only Super F! Angry with the camera thats all, have a great day everyone 👋🏻
Would be nice to see this same test after Android 15 drops since the 9 series was supposed to launch with to see if the Pixels were in fact optimized around that version.
I just bought the pixel 9 pro xl and it's very snappy from the pixel 7. On the pixel battery adapters over time. I agree with other comments about the price but I got free headphones that I sold and got a huge amount for trade in and £100 from amex offer. Bringing the cost down to 400.
You math is wrong 1 screen 2 battery 3 camera 4ram 5ssd 6 body These are just some of the parts made by them for all phones not only their own use math mate@dominic7012
@@dominic7012 it doesn't matter if the end result for Samsung is best Android Flagship on market. Same goes of iphone and other brands. A 1000$ phone needs best hardware to justify it's price. Even apple uses screens made by LG and Samsung so they do not left behind in any category.
@dominic7012 That's literally the same for all of these. Apple only makes it's chips, samsung makes the screens for all three plus the cameras for itself and the pixel. Any phone can have good hardware but it depends on how they optimize it with software
As stated by many, this phone would have been competitive if it was $900 for the xl and maybe 800 for the pro. Pricing the phone at the same price as the apple pro phones with way worse battery and processor is a joke. Other than buying it to put your own bootloader on it, there is no reason or any justification to get the pixel over the competition
One thing to know about the pixel 9 is that the adaptive charging feature really slows down the charging big time. And that deactivating the feature doesn't really deactivate it. If you really want to deactivate adaptive charging you have to go to the battery saver, select adaptive charging at the bottom and turn off "Use Adaptive Charging". I'm all for saving energy but this feature on the pixel 9 is aggressive and will literally take up to 12 hours to fully charge the phone.
the Galaxy really showed what it's about with the browser test (and standby), but imagine how much better it would be if it used it's official apps, like samsung internet, samsung email, etc.
Pixel 9s are simply NOT worth the asking price. Criminal pricing. And just by geekbench numbers, the G4 should be compared to something like an 8 Gen 2 or maybe even the 8+ Gen 1. Yeah sure the G4 has good AI capabilities and is plenty fast for normal apps but its gonna show its age waaay earlier than an 8 gen 3 based device.
They want $1100 for a phone that has significantly worse battery life and performance? Pixel 9 should have been $599, Pixel 9 Pro $799 and Pixel 9 Pro XL $899. Then they would have been great value and a worthwhile choice for customers, but as it stands why on earth would you get one lol
I got mine for 999 with the promotions and got some freebies too. If you pay retail then yes it's stupid... But let's not forget the 24 ultra costs about 2-300 more
I wouldn’t even get a pixel 9 pro at 999 over a 16 pro even though I prefer androids. At least the 16 pro would do better in performance longevity and battery life.
the pixel beats it on mobile data only, and its 200$ cheaper than a s24 ultra...and twice as bright. so yeah it's worth it if you want the best display on an android right now (US).
Pixel apologists will defend their chips as being efficient and good enough for everyday tasks without issues. The same can be said about the A series for Samsung mid ranger. But the pixel cost over 1000. Where is the value with that?
Everyone please trust me phone buff keeps putting the same clip of s24 battery test in every comparison check the time and the comparison with the iPhone 15 pro max it’s the same clip every time
Their tests aren't as thorough and non biased as Phonebuffs. He calibrates everything and takes out human error from the equation, which is why I think he's the most reliable battery and speed tester of phones.
@@GeekyNerdThao93He also does his tests on wifi which makes it totally meaningless. Some channels do tests on mobile data which is the only battery life that really matters to me.
The Elephant in the Room is that Tensor is Exynos, that Exynos is garbage, has always been garbage (according to many Samsung phones that I owned), thus this test like many others just proofs it. Pixel Pro phones with that chipset never has been flagship phones, except the price, I don’t get the hype. They try to make up for it with software and AI, but that is a gimmick and over marketing IMO.
is there a similar battery drain test with a Samsung phone using the Exynos soc? That would be a more balanced test since we don't all live in the USA or South Korea. Sites deemed acceptable to have the Snapdragon chipset. Google have done their software best using a competitors chip.
Suggestion: since you have access to a mini cell tower, could you do a simulated bad cell signal test to see how these devices handle those situations?
In terms of power consumption, the Google Tensor G4 processor is not optimized very well, even if there are some improvements compared to the Tensor G3.
I dosent change things that much it still drives all the pixels its maybe a 5 % difference at most but they both have a 1080p default resolution so it wont make a difference
how is the battery of the s24 identical as 6 months ago vs the iphone ? did u use the old software? bcs the newer updates of the s24 ultra made the battery worse
I've actually have been having the complete opposite experience with my Pixel 9 Pro XL compared to my S24 Ultra. Though I might suspect the Ultra is doing more background tasks compared to the Pixel. But I don't have any actual concrete standardized test I can do to confirm. All I know, is under my personal usage, my Pixel lasts longer than my Ultra.
It throttles it's underpowered chip to extend battery life. Try taking photos at 50Mp resolution rapidly one after the other on a Pixel 9 Pro XL even, and watch it soon stagger and lag and even fail to take pictures at all when you press the shutter button. An S24 Ultra or IPhone 15 Pro Max will fly through such a task. The processor on the Pixel 9 (and it's storage speed) are midrange phone level.
Hello All, Got my s24 ultra 3 days back and from day 1 am facing battery draining issue even i don't use dat much like playing games or music but still facing such issue pls let me know if am missing anything. Thank you
In real life usage, I'm getting all day battery on the pixel and performance of it is fine since im not overly taxing the processor, but I am debating to return my pixel pro xl. Once the AI novelty wears off, I'm really just going to be left with a phone whose hardware is from 2021.
That’s why I decided to keep the Pixel 8 Pro. Since the Android 15 beta was released, the battery life appears to be quite similar to the Pixel 9 Pro XL. Moreover, the AI capabilities will also be available on the P8P. Considering the price tag of over £1200, there aren’t many significant additional benefits to upgrading.
Fine ist Not enough for the Price... You know that this means you will Not all the Features for newer Phones in 2-3 Years because of Lack of Performance 🤣 Even my Pixel 7 pro will Not get new Features Like the Zoom enhance with Android 15 ... So have fun With your Pixel iam done with Them...
During your browser test it looks like the Pixel has 4 tabs open while the S24 only had 2?? Couldn't that have helped the S24?? Then during the Google Maps test, Pixel had to display white most of the time, while the S24 was showing greenish. Wouldn't that also help the S24??
The Tensor platform is fundamentally flawed. It's perpetually slower and less efficient than its respective Snapdragon counterpart for any given year. Knowing this fact, I don't see why anyone would justify paying the same level of money for worse performance. Now, if each Pixel was $200 cheaper per each model, it may make sense as a "flagship killer" rather than a flagship. Just my 2 cents.
@@ezioauditore9416 yea i know the Pixel has the Pixel Launcher and Galaxy has OneUI but why does Google Messages and Google Maps look different on each phone
18% better battery life while having a smaller battery and a higher resolution is combined at least a 20% difference! thats huge
Light performance on the Samsung would likely end up having 30% when the pixel died
And slightly bigger display also with better performance
@@DragonOfTheMortalKombatin this test the screen was the same brightness
I doubt the extra 60mah would matter but this come to show how nobody can beat snapdragon which I find pretty stupid that Google persists on keep using their tenser g soc
@@thealex232323apple clearly beat snapdragon though? they use much smaller battery’s (around 4200 mAh) and still sometimes come on top with their chips.
Google needs be jailed for putting that processor for 1100$
Or the people that buy it for that price.
@@serrael-182that's why I wait 5-6 months to buy it as a reasonable price
Probably. I got mine for $250 with the trade in of my busted 7 pro.
@denischiosa4496 I feel like google is putting it at its current price for max profit to then price the phone where it was supposed to be and call it a discount.
samsung gave you a display that's half as bright for 200$ more.
If only the price of pixel was lower, it'd have been acceptable. But at that price its competing directly with apple and samsung. And no where it is near them performance wise with ufs 3.1 along with having a huge difference in battery life.
Just wait for sales. Pixel prices come down quickly.
it probably is better than what iPhone has to offer though.
@@PrimePixelRUclips stop being a pixel sheep and think for yourself
No Pixel slanted channel even mentions UFS 3.1. There is a lot of deceit in channels plugging the overpriced underpowered Pixel 9 series.
@@PrimePixelRUclips Completely not true. The price is the same as apple down to the storage size.
Pixel need to chill their ass with that pricing, and they'll make a big W.
Not a lot of people gonna spend 1K for a tensor G4, even tho we have[ _been promised_ ] 7 years of updates.
899 for the 9 Pro XL, 729 for the 9 Pro, and 669 for the 9. That is a *noice* deal
Do you really want to use the same phone for 7 years?
@@billzkustomzyes
@@billzkustomza lot of people do. Plus reselling a support phone is better then selling a phone with no more support:
@@billzkustomzThe way this usually works is the people who can afford to buy the new flagship phone, use it for maybe 3 years and then pass it on to a relative who can't afford a new phone or to one of their children. It's not usually one person using the phone for all that time.
It's fine as long as they are not chilling their ass on the discount.
The S24 Ultra is seven months older, too.
It also has the 2 times stronger chip
15 pro max is even older, with a smaller batter and that beats the S24 Ultra, too.
@@DerangedScout yeah but that's lil bit more acceptable as Samsung is also more powerful. Apple builds their own chip on their software so it's easier for them to make everything run smooth while consuming less battery. But there is a new battery tech out there that is smaller and keeps for juice. Let's see when the newest Samsung's and iPhones will build them in their phones.
@@emin62bek I mean, the battery test PhoneBuff runs includes apps optimized for both phones for the most part. Plus the 15PM won in the speed test...
@@emin62bek More powerful? 15PM won in the speed test. The speed tests he conducts includes apps optimized for most phones. (Not sure why my last comment was deleted)
It was honestly quite impressive to see the Google performing well into the 10 hour mark. At least it is improving, but needs more work if it wants to catch up to Samsung and Apple.
It needs a flagship level processor and flagship level storage speed to compete. And justify it's ridiculous price.
Yo, the S23 Ultra battery, when it came out last year, was just as good as the S24 Ultra's. Samsung's really stepped up their battery game over the years.
As always, awesome video!
Not really my s23ultra still last know we're near a day I'm at 40% battery and it's only 14:45 here
What did you expect when the battery size is the same
@@harryvlogs7833 I wish I had your battery life. I have had to charge a second time already and I am already at 91% 15:02 here 🤣
The s23 ultra reminded me of apples iPhone 13. It made a big leap in battery life.
@@InsighterofTech mmmn not that big leap in battery life still doesn't last a day any iPhone or phone
Im a Pixel use and will say that Google needs to have the basics (screen, camera, battery, charging, build) down to a T if they plan on sticking to the 'simple everyday' route. Its not a powerhouse, so they need to makesure everything else is immaculate so that the purchase and price is justified.
They also use archaic ufs 3.1 storage on the Pixel 9 series which will not age well at all. It will not be too long before advanced demanding apps will have this device staggering all over the place. People don't realise what they are buying here. It is slow by many midrange device standards. It's pricing is daylight robbery.
The screen, camera, display and build absolutely on point with the pixel 9 series. It's the processor that's always been the issue
@@mohammedsalimahmed5230 iPhone SE about to murder the Pixels when it comes out next spring at 500 buckaroos
Only thing stopping me buying pixel is the chip set lagging behind the competition and lower than average battery life.
I'm using Pixel 9 pro XL for the last 2 weeks and the battery life is fantastic. I'm getting a minimum of 8 hours screen on time on an average and 9.5 hours being the highest with 10% left. All this happened along with 24 hours of total usage. So I'm not worried about this comparison as I'm quite happy with its performance. I don't game much so I'm not worried about that as well. The price? Yeah it could have been a little cheaper but I am a happy customer.
PS: I'm not supporting just because I spent moneey on it but because the battery life is actually good!
The S24 Ultra is down 3/4th it's life cycle, just saying. Waiting for Apple to release it's iPhone 16 Pro Max, would love to see some more efficiency gains..
You don't know if it's been used and charged for the past 7 months though, it may have just been placed in storage and charged 5-10 times. Lithium-ion batteries can also last you 2 years before you start noticing differences in battery life.
@@PrimePixelRUclips by life cycle, I meant the product cycle, indicating the new S25 Ultra is around the corner, I used the wrong word, apologies for that...
@@PrimePixelRUclips 20-80 charging can make lithium batteries last up to 4 years, a good BMS chip can make the battery last by 1 year extra added ontop. Keeping the phone below 40 celsius, helps it last as well. My old Xiaomi is 3.5 years yet I got away with using only 55% the whole day with an hour recording at 1080p, 4h on screen.
Not surprised Google is still behind but charging similar prices.
I have a OnePlus 12 and my girlfriend has an s24 ultra. We both love our phones and neither one of us ever worry about running out of battery. I used to have a google pixel 6 and even while using battery saver the battery life was horrible. It drained like crazy, and after that experience I will never buy another google pixel device at least until they swap away from their exynos based tensor chip.
Can you please do atleast 30-40% of the test on mobile data as mobile data consumes more battery compared to wifi
Ditto. Each phase should have a wifi and a mobile data pass.
Still waiting for "iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Battery Drain Test"
Me too 😉
Ok samsung users waiting for s25 ultra🤩🤩
I actually think the iPhone might get beat this time
@@vitriolveio 😑 let's see
@@vitriolveio Mrwhosetheboss' test showed samsung destroying the apple battery by a huga margin due android 14 being highly efficient vs 13
I love the Samsung s24 ultra battery. It's a real beast.
Mine doesn't last long, noticed on Day 1 that the battery is not as advertised , am i missing something 🤷♂️
@@muchalobest6070 facing same issue from day 1 and it's been 3 days I've bought my 24 ultra but battery is too poor 😢
@@muchalobest6070 im sayin bro, i need to charge mines like 2 times a day
the only thing I can think of is the S24U has been out since February and has had 6 months worth of software updates to help optimize things (and it seems like Samsung releases an update every 2 weeks) whereas the Pixel 9 series has only been out for a couple weeks and they haven't fully optimized it yet.
I had the S22 Ultra... 8 Gen 1 was a beast I know, but in battery life againts my S24 Ultra this last one has a Great battery life. I'm happy with it 😊 only Super F! Angry with the camera thats all, have a great day everyone 👋🏻
The fact that the s24 ultra has been used for 7 months. Really says a lot about its battery 🔋
Best battery test on RUclips much more realistic
Slower, worse battery life, not a fundamentally different software experience...who is the target demographic for this phone?
People who want the best camera experience on a phone.
@@v_creator7514 so again they will opt for S24 ultra. So the question still remains understand, who is the target demographic for this phone.
@@harshvardhansinhaBecause they want the worse camera experience of the ultra? I don't think so.
People who want a simpler android experience while also getting the latest android features first.
@v_creator7514 pixel has the worse cameras. And without video boost, it's a total garbage. Lmao
Would be nice to see this same test after Android 15 drops since the 9 series was supposed to launch with to see if the Pixels were in fact optimized around that version.
I just bought the pixel 9 pro xl and it's very snappy from the pixel 7. On the pixel battery adapters over time. I agree with other comments about the price but I got free headphones that I sold and got a huge amount for trade in and £100 from amex offer. Bringing the cost down to 400.
Trust me, a $600-$700 S23 Plus is a much better deal than this $1200 Pixel 9 Pro XL.
🚶🏽♂️🚶🏽♂️🚶🏽♂️
I like the Pixel 9 Pro XL but truly it's overpriced. It shouldn't cost more than $850 for the 256GB.
Got a pixel 9 for 300$ on black friday through my carrier with a 25$/m 55gb data plan. Getting one for 850$ is a straight scam
S24 Ultra and Iphone 15 pro eats pixels in breakfast when it comes to hardware. Google just can't compete on hardware level.
Samsung hardware? It’s Qualcomm hardware.
80% of what’s in a Samsung phone isn’t developed by Samsung.
You math is wrong
1 screen
2 battery
3 camera
4ram
5ssd
6 body
These are just some of the parts made by them for all phones not only their own use math mate@dominic7012
@@dominic7012 it doesn't matter if the end result for Samsung is best Android Flagship on market. Same goes of iphone and other brands. A 1000$ phone needs best hardware to justify it's price. Even apple uses screens made by LG and Samsung so they do not left behind in any category.
@dominic7012 That's literally the same for all of these. Apple only makes it's chips, samsung makes the screens for all three plus the cameras for itself and the pixel. Any phone can have good hardware but it depends on how they optimize it with software
The irony is Pixel also falls behind on the software side.
As stated by many, this phone would have been competitive if it was $900 for the xl and maybe 800 for the pro. Pricing the phone at the same price as the apple pro phones with way worse battery and processor is a joke. Other than buying it to put your own bootloader on it, there is no reason or any justification to get the pixel over the competition
Here's an idea. Compare the old flagship like the 22 ultra with the new 24 ultra 😮
Are you planning battery drain test for all 15 and 16 series phones?
One thing to know about the pixel 9 is that the adaptive charging feature really slows down the charging big time. And that deactivating the feature doesn't really deactivate it. If you really want to deactivate adaptive charging you have to go to the battery saver, select adaptive charging at the bottom and turn off "Use Adaptive Charging".
I'm all for saving energy but this feature on the pixel 9 is aggressive and will literally take up to 12 hours to fully charge the phone.
the Galaxy really showed what it's about with the browser test (and standby), but imagine how much better it would be if it used it's official apps, like samsung internet, samsung email, etc.
Pixel 9s are simply NOT worth the asking price. Criminal pricing.
And just by geekbench numbers, the G4 should be compared to something like an 8 Gen 2 or maybe even the 8+ Gen 1.
Yeah sure the G4 has good AI capabilities and is plenty fast for normal apps but its gonna show its age waaay earlier than an 8 gen 3 based device.
when you're so early that all you see in the comments are bots.
Aren't you a bot somehow?
@@strategistaow3520 aren't you also one?
Internet is a fucking place
They want $1100 for a phone that has significantly worse battery life and performance?
Pixel 9 should have been $599, Pixel 9 Pro $799 and Pixel 9 Pro XL $899. Then they would have been great value and a worthwhile choice for customers, but as it stands why on earth would you get one lol
I got mine for 999 with the promotions and got some freebies too. If you pay retail then yes it's stupid... But let's not forget the 24 ultra costs about 2-300 more
I wouldn’t even get a pixel 9 pro at 999 over a 16 pro even though I prefer androids. At least the 16 pro would do better in performance longevity and battery life.
Actually, that 1100$ is for the 128gb variant 😅
@@Subbias2024and you think you did well? 😂
the pixel beats it on mobile data only, and its 200$ cheaper than a s24 ultra...and twice as bright. so yeah it's worth it if you want the best display on an android right now (US).
This is also why I still think that the chip is the most important component in a phone
Really need you guys to do the iPhone 16s battery test😭
Finally!! Let's Go!!
Pixel apologists will defend their chips as being efficient and good enough for everyday tasks without issues. The same can be said about the A series for Samsung mid ranger. But the pixel cost over 1000. Where is the value with that?
okay Samsung apologist.
Everyone please trust me phone buff keeps putting the same clip of s24 battery test in every comparison check the time and the comparison with the iPhone 15 pro max it’s the same clip every time
Isn't that good? No battery degradation
Why other youtubers show different results in favor of pixel 9 pro XL. I am confused.
What tests?
Their tests aren't as thorough and non biased as Phonebuffs. He calibrates everything and takes out human error from the equation, which is why I think he's the most reliable battery and speed tester of phones.
they run more benchmarks than this which will cause the snapdragon chip to work at peak performance and consume more battery than the other.
@@GeekyNerdThao93He also does his tests on wifi which makes it totally meaningless. Some channels do tests on mobile data which is the only battery life that really matters to me.
RUclipsrs owe a lot to Google. It’s their return of favour
I AINT GONNA SAY NOTHING BUT WATCH THE PHONE CLOCKS
Genuinely curious how yall match your animated slider with the real time battery life of the phones?
Lo más esperado!
256GB+ pixel pro models use UFS 4.0 with a 3.1 controller btw
128gb and possibly non-pro uses 3.1
0:44 whats up with the lens? seems dusty/scatched
do you make one test and then use that test for the phone against other phones?
spoiler alert : Samsung won by a whole 1 hour and 38 mins
on wifi...check any test using only data. pixel wins.
@@TheElementSwing nope pixel loses even more they heat up fast and on data it taxes them
@@TheElementSwing?? It's even worse on Data
@@TheElementSwingnot at all lmao
2024 and the RUclips comment section still filled with tons of people arguing over which phone is “better”.
The Elephant in the Room is that Tensor is Exynos, that Exynos is garbage, has always been garbage (according to many Samsung phones that I owned), thus this test like many others just proofs it. Pixel Pro phones with that chipset never has been flagship phones, except the price, I don’t get the hype. They try to make up for it with software and AI, but that is a gimmick and over marketing IMO.
Tensor remains a joke. In other news, water is wet
0:56 for the start of the test.
we need the 16 pro max battery test to disprove the fake test by mrwhosthebossftw
Can we appreciate this guy 🔥
Who’s coming here every day to see if the iPhone 16 pro max vs galaxy s24 ultra has been released?? Coz it’s only official when phonebuff does it!!!
Are you using fresh new phones for each test????
is there a similar battery drain test with a Samsung phone using the Exynos soc? That would be a more balanced test since we don't all live in the USA or South Korea. Sites deemed acceptable to have the Snapdragon chipset. Google have done their software best using a competitors chip.
ALL S24 Ultra got the Snapdragon-SoC. 🤪
Don't cry lika a Google-Baby. 😏
Suggestion: since you have access to a mini cell tower, could you do a simulated bad cell signal test to see how these devices handle those situations?
Thats why its not just about having larger battery capacity… just watch this video and its actually about efficiency and power consumption
I would love to see the same test but with WiFi off - just mobile data (preferably 4G).
I have both, but pixel pro 9 is becoming my primary phone, better photo and using experience.
In terms of power consumption, the Google Tensor G4 processor is not optimized very well, even if there are some improvements compared to the Tensor G3.
i am curious how would they perform while on dark mode and mobile data instead of wifi
*Did you set both phones to max resolution in display settings?*
I dosent change things that much it still drives all the pixels its maybe a 5 % difference at most but they both have a 1080p default resolution so it wont make a difference
Adding "XL" at the end of the product's name doesn't do much, it seems.
🔴 The ultra in this test did a 2 min better than in the last video against the 15 pro max that did the exact same time 27h and 45min
Good
As someone who's on a pixel 8 I can't wait to switch to the 16 pro
The battery especially on idle is awful
This just makes you feel even more sorry for the Pixel So-called Pro XL 🤭🤣
Watching on my S24 Ultra.. Phone of the year ❤
would love to see this test with the samsung exynos version
Did you let the pixel's battery adapt for few days?
It's missing an important point. When the telephone is sleeping how long does it take to receive a phone call, a message, notification.
Note pixel and galaxy #TIME😮
how is the battery of the s24 identical as 6 months ago vs the iphone ? did u use the old software? bcs the newer updates of the s24 ultra made the battery worse
With looks of it he does the battery test when the phone comes out and just keeps re- using that same test. If you get what I’m saying
plz make a video on exynos 2400 vs 8 gen3 we will love it!
Where to get your Samsung wallpaper plz
Do u make Iphone 16 Pro Max vs Galaxy S24 Ultra battery test
@phonebuff In S24U vs IPhone 15 pro S24U did 27h 43 min,in here it did 27h 45min So isn't the official record now ?
OnePlus 12 vs pixel 9 XL speed test, and battery test that will be something.
0:06 the way he said ULTRAAAAA
He didn't scream
it was more of an ulltraAaa 🎶
Exactly lol😂@@kasadam85
I've actually have been having the complete opposite experience with my Pixel 9 Pro XL compared to my S24 Ultra.
Though I might suspect the Ultra is doing more background tasks compared to the Pixel. But I don't have any actual concrete standardized test I can do to confirm.
All I know, is under my personal usage, my Pixel lasts longer than my Ultra.
It throttles it's underpowered chip to extend battery life. Try taking photos at 50Mp resolution rapidly one after the other on a Pixel 9 Pro XL even, and watch it soon stagger and lag and even fail to take pictures at all when you press the shutter button. An S24 Ultra or IPhone 15 Pro Max will fly through such a task. The processor on the Pixel 9 (and it's storage speed) are midrange phone level.
Hello All,
Got my s24 ultra 3 days back and from day 1 am facing battery draining issue even i don't use dat much like playing games or music but still facing such issue pls let me know if am missing anything. Thank you
why is the time on the phones a minute apart at the start of the test and 6 minutes apart when the pixel dies???
Problem is the Tensor chip has to work harder than the snapdragon because its weaker, thus using power power. Or am I wrong?
Pixel 9 pro xl vs iphone 15 pro max battery test please
In real life usage, I'm getting all day battery on the pixel and performance of it is fine since im not overly taxing the processor, but I am debating to return my pixel pro xl. Once the AI novelty wears off, I'm really just going to be left with a phone whose hardware is from 2021.
That’s why I decided to keep the Pixel 8 Pro. Since the Android 15 beta was released, the battery life appears to be quite similar to the Pixel 9 Pro XL. Moreover, the AI capabilities will also be available on the P8P. Considering the price tag of over £1200, there aren’t many significant additional benefits to upgrading.
Fine ist Not enough for the Price...
You know that this means you will Not all the Features for newer Phones in 2-3 Years because of Lack of Performance 🤣
Even my Pixel 7 pro will Not get new Features Like the Zoom enhance with Android 15 ...
So have fun With your Pixel iam done with Them...
@@gameplays1993 that's why I'm debating to return lol. As soon as this AI stuff is old news, hardware is so far behind.
@GeekyNerdThao93 A $600 S23 Plus will do as well if not better than this Pixel 9 Pro XL
@@rolins3279 I came from a s21 ultra. It's like similar performance honestly lol
What do you mean by delta in the sentence (very big delta)?
Gap
it means difference. You are using it in maths
@@interproservice Thanks for clearing this up.. But why not just use plain English? What's the point of using mathematic term?
We must acknowledge that Samsung is atleast a year head from both apple and google
During your browser test it looks like the Pixel has 4 tabs open while the S24 only had 2?? Couldn't that have helped the S24??
Then during the Google Maps test, Pixel had to display white most of the time, while the S24 was showing greenish. Wouldn't that also help the S24??
I have no idea if it makes a difference, but you're right, the Tensor is keeping 2 more tabs open.
2 crying Google-Babies. 😂
@@ezioauditore9416 Meh, I have owned both phones. But they want everything to be equal, so the details should matter!!
I'll still get a Pixel I think. Just cleaner UI, faster updates and no bloat. Or I'll get the one that is cheapest on Black Friday
isn't the pixel processor based on exynos ?
you should test the sony 1 mark 6 , apparently it has insane battery life
It's all about optimization and Snapdragon 😅
The Tensor platform is fundamentally flawed. It's perpetually slower and less efficient than its respective Snapdragon counterpart for any given year. Knowing this fact, I don't see why anyone would justify paying the same level of money for worse performance. Now, if each Pixel was $200 cheaper per each model, it may make sense as a "flagship killer" rather than a flagship. Just my 2 cents.
I have seen other reviews saying the Pixel's battery life is actually the longest. Please use multiple reviews to enhance your knowledge.
Why do some Android apps look different on each phone when they are same app running on Android?
Yeah, they have the same OS ...
BUT they have differently User-Interfaces!
(pure Android vs One-UI by Samsung)
So, the look can be different.☝️😉
@@ezioauditore9416 yea i know the Pixel has the Pixel Launcher and Galaxy has OneUI but why does Google Messages and Google Maps look different on each phone
Soon we enter the s25 series leak season 🤔, snapdrsgon8gen4 vs Exynos 2500 😅
How about stand-by time? I don't use my phone non-stop all day.
He just tested it, right now. 🤪😂
You have to watch the video. 😏
Spoiling ...
Pixel needs more than twice of Energy. 😵
SONY XPERIA 1 VI VS APPLE iPhone 15 Pro Max, please. 😊 SONY is the King of Speed test
Why i am getting only 5-6 hours of SOT on s24ultra 😢
Where is s24u and OnePlus 12 battery test?
Do 13 pro max vs 16 pro max battery drain test please.