I’ll have to look that one up. However, it does make sense with regards to the tradition of the Father handing over his authority at the alter. I’ll get back to you. Thanks for the question.
You’re probably right. However, the father walking the daughter to the alter and giving her away is founded in something unique to the sacrament of marriage. I have never been to an ordination of a religious sister, but I don’t think the Father gives her away, because to marry Christ is a higher authority. I will think on this and ask around.
@@catholicdad876 I've watched a lot from Fr. Chad Ripperger (especially the Liber Christo) when he speaks on exorcism. The natural right authority in the context of performing exorcism over children by parents seems to cut off at the same age for both sons and daughters.
Great to hear from a fellow Catholic 🙏
Where do you get the idea that the father retains authority over their daughters but not their sons at a certain age?
I’ll have to look that one up. However, it does make sense with regards to the tradition of the Father handing over his authority at the alter. I’ll get back to you. Thanks for the question.
@@catholicdad876 I think it stems more from tradition and a sense of piety than it does the natural law.
You’re probably right. However, the father walking the daughter to the alter and giving her away is founded in something unique to the sacrament of marriage. I have never been to an ordination of a religious sister, but I don’t think the Father gives her away, because to marry Christ is a higher authority.
I will think on this and ask around.
@@catholicdad876 I've watched a lot from Fr. Chad Ripperger (especially the Liber Christo) when he speaks on exorcism. The natural right authority in the context of performing exorcism over children by parents seems to cut off at the same age for both sons and daughters.
Once the son moves out or marries, he becomes responsible for himself
Christ -> man -> woman -> child
There isnt "Church" between Christ & man