Hey Chaps! Correction: Pixel 4 has SD855, not 865 (typo). ALSO I've had some feedback you'd prefer all phones to be at 60hz. That's fair. I think it's a scientific vs real-world debate. My thinking was this is closer to a real test with the phones set up as close to how most of us would use them IRL. Also, Pixel 4XL can't easily be forced to 60hz. But feedback is noted - the iPhone's lead would be reduced if all phones at 60. 👍
Dear Tom from the Tech Chap, I apperacaite that you are doing a battery test & i feel sorry that you had to work for 11 hours & 30 minutes, Anyways, yes i would like to see a charging speed test, & i think you should deserve 1M subs or more Thanks,
@@nicolasprountzos712 it's not about the processor bro, both have 7nm finfet process, the s20 goes to the last because the screen size is so huge, resolution is quad HD plus and the refresh rate is 120hz and the iPhone won the round because it's only has a 60hz display, if they include the huawei mate 30 pro it will win easily
@Cem il it is a shit because the display is so huge, the resolution it's qhd and the refresh rate is 120hz, iPhone won the round because it only has a 60hz display
Take a moment to laugh at exynos... I mean 5000 battery, great work samsung... pushing hardware to work like Snapdragon 865, but not exynos is consuming more battery but performance drops a lot too while gaming...
Redfield Markz yup remember A9 chip on iphone 6s made by samsung on 14nm is worse than tsmc in 16nm which is crazy till now they carry that inferior chip
the regular Pixel 4 was a joke though when it was released. got better now, but still aint great, espacially compared to phones in its pricerange and formfactor
@@HustlerBoy420 actually no...its cheaper than most flagships released other than the OnePlus 8 but then it's no the same form factor...the phn that is the same form factor is much more expensive i.e the iphone 11. 90hz at that size... it's not bad it's what u shud expect.
@Αντώνης Σάμπαλης and exynos flagship chipset for 2020 with the latest arm cores in it vs a phne with a last gen chip and 1300mAh less battery for a screen size that is 0.6" less. And pixel is at qhd where as samsung is at fhd which negates the 90vs 120. So i say impressive.
Владислав Романов yeah apple only has 60hz. Simple truth is iPhone users won't really care for higher refresh rates until apple implements it and apple won't implement it unless they feel can do so without significant battery drain like the others
@@MrRambee it could. for example, if you know that you will have a long trip, a flight for example, switching to 60Hz is a wise choice for better battery life
I wish you had commented the same last year when oneplus was the only one at 90hz and others at 60hz Never the less still I appreciate that you said it now 💖
Would be interesting to see how the OP8 Pro competes with the iPhone 11 Pro when it's set to FHD+ and 60Hz (to see if it has better battery life when set equal to the iPhone, even if most users won't actually use it like that)
I did the same, I've been a Samsung user for years but I just had enough with that chipset, the differences are just too big between the Exynos and Snapdragon version, infact I feel like they shouldn't even name both versions of the phone after same name. I switched to OnePlus 7t pro, best decision I've ever made.
Yeah, Completely agree with u. Used s9 exynos for over 1.5yrs but i had to carry a powerbank always with me. Now, buying oneplus 8 just because of camera & fast processing speed.
For all OP fans complaining about the prices, this is your fault. You guys wanted more, better, bigger and you got it. But as they say, beauty costs. But OP cares enough to give you what you want at a better price compared to others.
They increased their margin and started ignoring their real fanbase which made them big....that is unkind from OP I think people have the right to complain about that.
@@gurgelplus I am also a op fan bt people like u just see the price and not the increase in the features, quality, design etc which when seen in other company's phone no one will complain about its price
he spent 11 hours and 30 minutes without any break to let us know about the stats. how can people dislike this video? 🥴 great work on that video Tom ❤️ thanks a lot ❤️
@SKEKMAL this isn't supposed to be a real world test, nobody is going to be using their phones like this. Comparing them with the same refresh rate would give a more objective and normalised indication of how long their battery lasts. Enabling a higher refresh rate for this test is very silly, as it clearly gives a disadvantage to the Android phones that they don't actually have.
You gotta be kidding, that's because everybody else has up their game with 90 to 120 refresh rates and qhd screens while crapple is still pushing 60hz as standard with 1080p screen. If they put all the phones at 60hz, Apple wouldn't even come close. these apple sheep reviewers know exactly what they're doing. they deliberately set all the other phones to the fastest draining setting to make Apple look good. Smh, it's pitiful.
James Smith your point is? The iPhone has a small battery, and the screen resolution is 2688x1242 pixels. Its above 1080p. Then the « Screen refresh rate » is useless then if you dont want to use it just to save battery.
1- 5G chipsets are power hungry 2- faster screen refresh rate means more battery consumed 3- unoptimized android OS which is known to be a resource hog
real winner is OnePlus 8pro because it was at 120 hz qhd+ most of the time compared to 60 hz fhd+ of iphone. I think it would have beaten the iphone if switched to 60 hz fhd+
No bro it's not like that, cuz any any of this mobile can long last more than that mobile cuz that mobile was only used to check time(stop watch).if that mobile was run like the rest of mobiles it already went off
that would be interesting too. But I think most would want to use the higher refresh feature on these phones in real life. Or at least, they'd experience it as it's on by default or with the phones 'auto-switch' modes.
Agreed, Samsung phones in general should be cheaper for the laggy software which gets slower overtime.. Exynos versions should be even more cheaper than rest of Galaxies.
@@MAFz7 common get an update we're in 2020 you can't say this just clichés .. i'm on my s7 edge for 4 years now no lagg no slow performance and it is an exynos version so please don't spread fake news
Yes definitely 😊 I would further appreciate if it would be a wireless charging test cause I really want to see how good op 8 pro 30w wireless charging can do I have never got so many likes
Random Vids the 30w wireless charging on the Op8+ only works on their own custom build dock if you use the normal qi wireless charging, oneplus 8+ will only charge at 5w.
I'm FREAKING SURPRISED with the Oppo! I was sooo skeptical with those 4260mah vs 4500 in the oneplus. I was SURE the battery life would be its Achilles' heel, and... I was completely wrong! Damn! Very close to the Oneplus 8 pro. I'm pretty impressed.
90 and 120 Hz are great but I don’t mind the 60 Hz on iPhones. They are smooth anyway. And after seeing the test result, i don’t mind at all. I prefer a longer lasting battery.
Noted for next time. But in a real world scenario this is how the phones would be set up. You can't always just turn off all new features and cater to lowest common denominator as that's not real world. People with a s20 will mostly use it at 120hz
I've left samsung because of the poor battery performance... Since the end of February I got an OnePlus 7T Pro and it's awesome! With Samsung i couldn't get more then 3 hours of screen on time. Now with my OnePlus 7T Pro I can get around 8 to 9 hours of screen on time. I'm happy that I made the switch. :D
That's great battery life from OnePlus. I think at 60hz and FHD resolution it would have beat the Apple, even with a slightly larger screen. Would have a s20 Ultra right now if it wasn't for the exynos. Just pre-ordered my OnePlus 8 pro!
I think its time to move to apple INSANE CAMERA INSANE PERFORMANCE INSANE OPTIMIZATION INSANE BATTERY INSANE SUPPORT Yes Insane price but considering all of the above things is kinds justified
@@paimon7911 all 120hz phones have huge batteries so they should optimize their software and if you can't give the excuse If your implementing a 120hz display optimize the software and make sure it gets good battery It's 120hz is just an excuse for android fans to crap on the good studd of apple
Recent years? I own s9 plus exynos version and this phone has been a disappointment. Surely, it turned heads in the first year because of looks. But the performance has been very bad.
@@harshpranami7802 Yes Samsung S9 exynos sucks. The battery life and performance is terrible. Im very happy with my Oneplus 7 pro now. Very snappy up until now even it is a 1 year old phone and battery life if good.
I would be interested to see them all at 60Hz but I must say, I am impressed with the iPhone. Historically I've never been an iPhone fan and I still prefer Android, but I do admire, to an extent, Apple's strategy of sticking with a similar design for a few years and focusing all of their attention on the things that matter, like performance and battery.
@@saitama2508 Irrelevant. It's not a direct comparison unless the other devices match the iPhone display settings as closely as possible. If the OnePlus 8 Pro can beat the iPhone 11 Pro Max when it's at 1080p 60Hz, then it clearly has superior battery life. Just because it empowers users to up their display settings shouldn't penalise it and prevent it from winning the competition. Otherwise you incentivise manufacturers to provide the lowest possible display settings.
Damn oppo kind of surprised me. A relatively small battery with that huge 120hz qhd display and it still did surprisingly decently. That variable resolution probably helps battery life a lot
To be honest, you must keep everything at 60hz display, i mean its a cool feature that the other phone has the higher refrest but it kinda unfair because iPhone is at 60hz while the other phone is in their higher refresh rate
for the sake of fairness? yes, kinda. But for the realistic test? I think no. For everyone who bought flagship with higher refresh rate, there's no point decrease the refresh rate, that's such an exclusive feature... I already used to 120hz in my daily phone, and I would absolutely not decrease it for better battery life, do you understand this point of view? Well, I still understand why ppl want the test to set on same level refresh rate, for the sake of fairness, but that's really not realistic in my opinion. I think, the test should held in the best possible condition for each phone, I bought 120hz smartphone, so then turn it on seriously! Don't you think so. Or...just make two or more videos then lol, one video for the default screen out of the box, then the second test is using the same level 60Hz as ppl wish. Tho I care more for the first video, if you ask me
@@doniamer2009 well not crap but remember not long ago people were trashing the pixel 4 due to its battery. Well they look pretty stupid now imo as it outlasted the new s20 ultra which costs a kidney.
GOOGLE You Beauty: I still remember the time all the tech guys were so hard at that Pixel 4 XL for its battery. ( Now Pixel 4 starts at $499 and it's a steal. )
With a 60 hz refresh rate is it even relivent to use the iPhone in this test it had the advantage of not being upto scratch for the test, there software is great but it's always last years or the year befores hardware optimised chipset but a failure to innovate and inspire anymore!
A great test! Thank you for the video, it was informative and interesting to watch. Exynos, 5000 mAh battery... That's just "wow", but from negative side ))
Remember when pixel 4 only had 4 hours screen on time And thats why I dont trust tech reviews they use the phone 2weeks ( you know who I mean ) and switch to another one The real winner is the 499$ pixel for me
its about contents tested other reviewrs use heavy stuff like benchmarks over and over wish reduce screen on time it is about how well the phone performe versus other phones screen on time doesnt mean anything also 2 weeks means battery is 99/100% healthy also pixel 4 is 2800mah battery wish is weak for 90hz (not a winner) u can get fhd+ 120hz 6000mah zenfone 6 camera and +++++ for 480$ (rog phone 2)
@@UnknownGamer-uz5iz rog 2 use stock android like pixel oneplus use oxygen os wish is better than stock android, but if it is samsung one ui and huawei i agree with u stock is better
Well, obviously everyone likes this tests, including myself. It helps a lot deciding what phone to buy. However regardless if it´s default that some have 120hz display and Iphone 60Hz, the truth is that it makes a lot of difference and I don´t think is a fair comparison. Specially because some of the 120Hz phones, it is possible to swap to 60Hz. Some people may use the 120Hz when they are at home, and 60Hz when they need to travel or something. Good test anyway and we appreciate the work :)
@@Racko. iPhone was running at 60Hz on a small screen with 4G, at 120Hz with a bigger screen+5G it'd still be among the last ones if they add 500mah the price will jump $500 lol.
Here's something that more incredible than how trash is exynos chipset is, there are some issues that the next pixel phone which is Pixel 5 will rocking in exynos chipset :)
The pixel 5 will still be running snapdragon. The Pixel 6 will be running an in house chip made by Google, in collaboration with Samsung, NOT the exynos chip
Tech chap:- this is going to be a fair test Also tech chap putting a 1080p 60hz phone in the test and declaring him the winner😑 Either you set all phones at 1080p 60hz and then include the iPhone Or keep all phones at 90/120hz and just skip the iPhone in the test Cause you are just confusing and misleading those people who doesn't have much tech knowledge And also you are blindly giving apple credits for its efficiency while you yourself don't know the efficiency level on other phones M sure the iPhone will loose badly when all phones will be set to 1080p 60hz Didn't expect this from you Time to unsubscribe you
Divyesh Sinha clearly mistaken. iPhones have the best efficiency when it comes to battery optimisation and low power requiring cores in the new A13 Bionic. So it won’t “LOSE* badly” as you said.
@@venkatkandukuri4924 why do you think so Only Cause apple told you? All these years apple used to loose battery test They were efficient before agreed But are they still efficient? It's a debatable topic with the 11 pro max At present you are just guessing Let's hope some guy Some guy makes a battery comparison video with other phones at 1080p 60hz
I think the winner is between ONE PLUS 8 PRO and OPPO FIND X2 PRO. Large display, higher refresh rate with QHD+. Only a difference is a battery. followed by Huawei, then Pixel 4XL, then S20 Ultra and iPhone 11 pro max in the last. Also, I think a fair comparison was supposed to be, all devices set to 60Hz at FHD+.
I think few people realize that current phones are so powerful, you can easily keep them in "Power saving" mode. With my current phone, I never went out of "Battery Saver" mode. Because the performance it's all the same in daily tasks, .but the battery is upped a lot. Maybe you should do a max performance vs battery saving mode battery longevity test.
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
Hey Chaps! Correction: Pixel 4 has SD855, not 865 (typo). ALSO I've had some feedback you'd prefer all phones to be at 60hz. That's fair. I think it's a scientific vs real-world debate. My thinking was this is closer to a real test with the phones set up as close to how most of us would use them IRL. Also, Pixel 4XL can't easily be forced to 60hz. But feedback is noted - the iPhone's lead would be reduced if all phones at 60. 👍
Yeah
Which one best Samsung s20+ or note 10+
Pixel 4 XL is not FHD+, neither has option for this. It's Qhd+ only
Dear Tom from the Tech Chap,
I apperacaite that you are doing a battery test & i feel sorry that you had to work for 11 hours & 30 minutes,
Anyways, yes i would like to see a charging speed test, & i think you should deserve 1M subs or more
Thanks,
Imagine if apple put 5,000 mAh in that device? It will surely be a 2 day device.
Shame Exynos, Utter *Shame.*
Puppy shame
This is not about the processor, the display and the resolution and refresh rate is so high
Can you import the sd variant? Its unlocked so it works with all carriers around the world right?
@@evil_xsimon3639 no you're absolutely wrong,exynos does drain the battery faster than the snap ver.
@@nicolasprountzos712 it's not about the processor bro, both have 7nm finfet process, the s20 goes to the last because the screen size is so huge, resolution is quad HD plus and the refresh rate is 120hz and the iPhone won the round because it's only has a 60hz display, if they include the huawei mate 30 pro it will win easily
S20 has 5000 mAh which is more than all of them, then also......
I think it is the exynos version that's why it didn't performed well.
The Snapdragon will give you an additional 30 mins at most.
Just import snapdragon since its unlocked
please dont forget that display size does eat up battery , its only 5000 mah to support the giant screen
@Cem il it is a shit because the display is so huge, the resolution it's qhd and the refresh rate is 120hz, iPhone won the round because it only has a 60hz display
@@lukhanyolungadyani4531 it beat the iPhone by every way and if it was on 60hrt it would also beat it by battery
Surely the winner is the phone with the timer - it outlasted them all, lol
Exactly
Yes but the iPhone has the worst screenl (it still very good tho)
Haha
Not hard when you have the worse refresh rate , memory , and screen
Segis Puig Verdaguer they are set in the same resolution u idiot
Take a moment to laugh at exynos... I mean 5000 battery, great work samsung... pushing hardware to work like Snapdragon 865, but not exynos is consuming more battery but performance drops a lot too while gaming...
Watching this from s20 ultra lte u are right😥😤
exynos just a inferior processor 🤦♂️
Redfield Markz yup remember A9 chip on iphone 6s made by samsung on 14nm is worse than tsmc in 16nm which is crazy till now they carry that inferior chip
It‘s a shame because otherwise the s20 ultra would be a freakin good phone
Samsung's exynos just a scam !
Yep I just got scammed
People should ban them until they come up with a solution
@@ashkaanmulji9083 same here bro
@@davidrzmv3052 exactly
@@gideonewuah4644 but to be fair for me I don't feel that bad because the most I do is watch videos only if it had better battery life
So everyone complaining about the Pixel's small battery, yet it still outlasts the S20 Ultra.
Lol
the regular Pixel 4 was a joke though when it was released. got better now, but still aint great, espacially compared to phones in its pricerange and formfactor
@@HustlerBoy420 actually no...its cheaper than most flagships released other than the OnePlus 8 but then it's no the same form factor...the phn that is the same form factor is much more expensive i.e the iphone 11. 90hz at that size... it's not bad it's what u shud expect.
@Αντώνης Σάμπαλης and exynos flagship chipset for 2020 with the latest arm cores in it vs a phne with a last gen chip and 1300mAh less battery for a screen size that is 0.6" less. And pixel is at qhd where as samsung is at fhd which negates the 90vs 120. So i say impressive.
Not so fast...that's the crap version of the Ultra with the Exynos...
Am i surprise that a 60hz screen phone last the longest ?! No
I’m surprised that the Exynos chip is that trash.
60hz screen phone also has the smallest battery
@@amritkang13 And the 2nd smallest display, and lower resolution
i didnt expect Oneplus 8 Pro do so well considering the 2K large screen combined with 120Hz. Very well optimed
@@amritkang13 too much weed i guess
Also that phones battery degrades, it was released last year. Apple really did a good job on optimization.
Nobody:
Really nobody:
Nokia: what a shame
Please give me a mind should i buy s10 or iPhone X ?
@@kevinzavalina7030 S10
@@kevinzavalina7030 iphone
This was really entertaining.
Good job OnePlus.
Good job Apple
Apple has only 60 Hz
Владислав Романов yeah apple only has 60hz. Simple truth is iPhone users won't really care for higher refresh rates until apple implements it and apple won't implement it unless they feel can do so without significant battery drain like the others
@@vladyslavromanov7039 Yes, apple is the looser here. you cannot compare 60hz with 120hz and qhd screen.
there are tests made there apple still the king stfu
@@kingdeedee Tests have been made prouddroid shit Apple = king
Could you maybe confirm just for comparison how the situation looks like when all phones are at 60hz? thx :)
But then it wouldn't reflect real world use which would be useless..
@@MrRambee it could. for example, if you know that you will have a long trip, a flight for example, switching to 60Hz is a wise choice for better battery life
@@Geomlord exactly my point
@@MrRambee maybe for you but I like to have an option in case I have long day without access to power
I wish you had commented the same last year when oneplus was the only one at 90hz and others at 60hz
Never the less still I appreciate that you said it now 💖
Would be interesting to see how the OP8 Pro competes with the iPhone 11 Pro when it's set to FHD+ and 60Hz (to see if it has better battery life when set equal to the iPhone, even if most users won't actually use it like that)
+ both dark theme
I think OP 8 Pro will win by seeing this test.
Finally someone mentioned this
Thanks bro💖
@@lorep7412 literally all phones will beat the iPhone when set to 1080p 60hz
I too wish they were all at 60hz to see if the iPhone is more efficient or is it just less drain on the battery
And here we see why I'm replacing my 5th Samsung phone with a one+. I'm sick of waiting for a snapdragon Samsung! Bloody exynos.
I understand, i'm waiting for my oneplus 8 pro too replacing my samsung.
I did the same, I've been a Samsung user for years but I just had enough with that chipset, the differences are just too big between the Exynos and Snapdragon version, infact I feel like they shouldn't even name both versions of the phone after same name. I switched to OnePlus 7t pro, best decision I've ever made.
S20 has 120hz for this reason he lost and the iphone lost because iphon use 60hz and 120hz consume mote
@@Aleeex03_ O+ 8 pro has 120hz too :) see how garbage that exynos is
Yeah,
Completely agree with u.
Used s9 exynos for over 1.5yrs but i had to carry a powerbank always with me.
Now, buying oneplus 8 just because of camera & fast processing speed.
For all OP fans complaining about the prices, this is your fault. You guys wanted more, better, bigger and you got it. But as they say, beauty costs. But OP cares enough to give you what you want at a better price compared to others.
Exactly bro 👏👏
In India the base variant of OP 8 pro released at only 720USD. Great pricing
They increased their margin and started ignoring their real fanbase which made them big....that is unkind from OP
I think people have the right to complain about that.
@@gurgelplus they're a company, not a charity service. When you're running a business, you've got to do what you gotta do.
@@gurgelplus I am also a op fan bt people like u just see the price and not the increase in the features, quality, design etc which when seen in other company's phone no one will complain about its price
Ew samsung exynos is so way behind
frr
I'm from Singapore.. But I want snapdragon not exynos. How to get snapdragon?? Must I go to American to get it?
@@nazbmn242 Import it! use services like vpost
@@clickbaitpro don't forget if you import no warranty
@@blade8800 ok i hate samsung for this... shame on em
The interesting thing there is how much RUclipsrs bashed the pixel 4 XL , and it actually performed better than the s20 ultra , thanks for the vid !
And is like 10% worse than most other phone which is nothing
That's because since it came out, google have been working on improving battery drain through software. It is way better now than it was back then
With a much smaller battery.
The phone with the largest battery lost to the rest of the crowd. Samsung is a joke
@@kramshiron Just check my last tweet at Hani_4k and see the screenshots I've shared. Don't follow me. Just see it.
he spent 11 hours and 30 minutes without any break to let us know about the stats. how can people dislike this video? 🥴 great work on that video Tom ❤️ thanks a lot ❤️
The Samsung fanboys mad at the results.
u know he isn't that fool to wait for 12 hours, he probably only spend about 2 hours at most.
Including the iPhone really skews the figures. Run it again with them all at 60 hertz.
@SKEKMAL this isn't supposed to be a real world test, nobody is going to be using their phones like this. Comparing them with the same refresh rate would give a more objective and normalised indication of how long their battery lasts. Enabling a higher refresh rate for this test is very silly, as it clearly gives a disadvantage to the Android phones that they don't actually have.
shut up
2019 vs 2020, lol
Iphones infos is lower than this 5phone 3900mAh is really food for iphone because it uses low energy. Sory for my bad english
Anyone remember when Apple would always get last 3 years ago? How times have changed.
It's because of the refresh rate, iPhone still at 60hz
You gotta be kidding, that's because everybody else has up their game with 90 to 120 refresh rates and qhd screens while crapple is still pushing 60hz as standard with 1080p screen. If they put all the phones at 60hz, Apple wouldn't even come close. these apple sheep reviewers know exactly what they're doing. they deliberately set all the other phones to the fastest draining setting to make Apple look good. Smh, it's pitiful.
James Smith your point is? The iPhone has a small battery, and the screen resolution is 2688x1242 pixels. Its above 1080p. Then the « Screen refresh rate » is useless then if you dont want to use it just to save battery.
1- 5G chipsets are power hungry
2- faster screen refresh rate means more battery consumed
3- unoptimized android OS which is known to be a resource hog
@@hannahmontana5117 The iPhone is 4G and 60Hz with a small screen, with 5G and 120Hz it probably wouldn't fare much better than the S20 Ultra.
real winner is OnePlus 8pro because it was at 120 hz qhd+ most of the time compared to 60 hz fhd+ of iphone. I think it would have beaten the iphone if switched to 60 hz fhd+
Exactly my thoughts to
maybe 2h more than the iPhone
I would probably agree with that!
@@Thetechchap Do another test with all phones to 60Hz?
but why would you put it at 60Hz when 120Hz is a feature of the phone that you are paying
only if iPhone's outstanding optimization meets Android's variety of customization...
Next time ,we want a test with all of them at 60hz
sure thing! Noted the feedback
@@Thetechchap The same resolution as well
@@Thetechchap I'd really love that man. Just for reference.
And I wish the OnePlus had a 90Hz settings. Something in-between
@@Thetechchap can you include a gaming phone ? Like the asus rog 2. Just to have every categories
A butthurt person who couldn't accept the defeat of his favourite android phone .
But the real question is what phone is used as a timer to track this ? Seems like that's the best one as it times everyone and still kept running.
Ah ah! Thats funny but obviously that one was only doing the count. Not other applications...
Huawei.. but which model I don't know.
@Ezra Redgwell no the s9 doesnt have a notch, might be one of the budget samsungs 🤷♂️
Its the huawei p30 pro
No bro it's not like that, cuz any any of this mobile can long last more than that mobile cuz that mobile was only used to check time(stop watch).if that mobile was run like the rest of mobiles it already went off
The real winner is the P30 Pro timing all of them
😂😂😂
You like a blind
I agree. Because the RUclips he played it was from the browser. Not from app.
@@BritishianFoodbychefsyedrahil Well,That's the P40 Pro
I’ve to say
When Apple comes with 120Hz + 5000mAh battery...🤭
Sam Jerome they will only do it when they can guarantee iPhone 11 Pro Max level battery life. Apple really smashed it with battery life in this thing
Wait 4 years for that
@@osiristweet73 60hz fhd+ nahh. Not fair battle
You can wait another 2 years for that when others phone move to another tech
@I I yeah Oneplus 8 pro is 1300nits, 10bit, 1440p, 120hz and still performing like a champ
Actually the real winner is OnePlus 8 pro.
Pushing double the refresh rate at 120hz and QHD resolution.
The ultimate beast of 2020.
Wish it did not have the curves.
True and it is cheaper than the iPhone 11 Pro Max
Probably oneplus would’ve been my option if I didn’t get the iPhone 11 Pro Max
Oneplus 8 pro is the clear winner. As always oneplus doesn't disappoint.
i think oppo is the winner here considering it charges insanely fast
Yessir
@@TheBigEmstos yes oppo did great and it has a smaller battery, but it doesn't have the highest quality screen compared to OnePlus
@@lellienicole their screens are identical
@@TheBigEmstos Oneplus 8 pro also charger really quickly
4:21 you got me i just jumped to the end 😂
Gotta say Huawei has done an amazing job in reducing the bottom chin bezzel...it is so so sleek
Hey man it came first in other video better than 11 pro max but here it's different
You should do one with all of them at 60hz
that would be interesting too. But I think most would want to use the higher refresh feature on these phones in real life. Or at least, they'd experience it as it's on by default or with the phones 'auto-switch' modes.
Iphone still wins
@@Thetechchap yeah but it will give us an idea how iPhone 12 will perform if it's gonna have a 120Hz display, you should do it.
@@mythbuster4315 but it lost to Mate30 Pro, so no.
This would be very interesting to see. Also, wish the ROG Phone II was there as the Android device with biggest battery capacity.
I dont want 11:30 hours.. (60 hz and FHD+), I want QHD+ and qhd 120 hz :)) Never Settle ONEPLUS 8
I am user of both iphone and one plus but I feel one plus"QHD" is inferior than apples "FHD"
@@ajinkyakapale3060 you need to visit an eye doctor asap
@@Divyesh_Sinha he needs a therapist for his fanboyism as well.
@@ajinkyakapale3060 you need to visit an eye doctor asap
@@ajinkyakapale3060 Display Mate says otherwise.
The Exynos version should be cheaper.
MadOrange644 It is
@@robot2374 The Ultra is the same price worldwide
Agreed, Samsung phones in general should be cheaper for the laggy software which gets slower overtime.. Exynos versions should be even more cheaper than rest of Galaxies.
@@MAFz7 common get an update we're in 2020 you can't say this just clichés .. i'm on my s7 edge for 4 years now no lagg no slow performance and it is an exynos version so please don't spread fake news
@@limitededitiion Samsungs are still laggy in 2020, even the Note 10 still stutters out of the box.
You got a new subscription just for putting this out so early 👍🏼
Exactly. His effort is appreciated.
Wow 1:04 p40 pro have Quran (Muslims book) on it ❤️
I’m proud of my 11 pro max. Good video man !
Shame on 60 hz display 😂😂
Aamien Gurung doesn’t matter much until you are a gamer. Most games support 60 FPS only.
Till you take any real large pics and see it has no detail lol
Yes It's Me 11 pro max has still best in camera section . What are u talking about.
@@toxicfellow1239 absolutely not even close, it's a good camera but today's phones blow it away with real detail
Yes definitely 😊
I would further appreciate if it would be a wireless charging test cause I really want to see how good op 8 pro 30w wireless charging can do
I have never got so many likes
Random Vids the 30w wireless charging on the Op8+ only works on their own custom build dock
if you use the normal qi wireless charging, oneplus 8+ will only charge at 5w.
50% in 30 minutes far better than s20 ultra but
10 watt only on regular wireless charger
40w of Huawei too
Defintely impressed by the oneplus 8 pro!
LoVeD it
I mean it was a fun comparison but your telling me the smallest screen size and lowest refresh rate lasted the longest? NO SHIT!!
Insane the difference between the SD and Exynos Ultra.
Sorry for anyone wasting any money on the S20U.
That's unfair .Go with 60 hz all of them and FHD+ and we will see who's the real winner
That's exactly my point is. you cannot compare 60Hz with THE 120 HZ.
yes, you can since the iPhone is a mobile from last year and this year the mhA have been increased to support more hz
Raad Samu iphone too😂
Raad Samu the 11pro max outperforms all lash years 60hz flagships 🤦🏻♂️
JT- cry me a river!!
Excellent performance from oneplus, qhd and 120 hz refresh rate still came 2nd.
I'm FREAKING SURPRISED with the Oppo! I was sooo skeptical with those 4260mah vs 4500 in the oneplus. I was SURE the battery life would be its Achilles' heel, and... I was completely wrong! Damn! Very close to the Oneplus 8 pro. I'm pretty impressed.
My third day with oppo find x2 pro. Easily getting 6-7 hours of screen on time even with heavy usage.
90 and 120 Hz are great but I don’t mind the 60 Hz on iPhones. They are smooth anyway. And after seeing the test result, i don’t mind at all. I prefer a longer lasting battery.
Can you do a test where all of the phones are at 60 hrz ?
exactly Iphone worked in 60Hz.
That's the right way to do a battery drain test.
He should have done so. This test is as dumb as most of other tests on youtube. Never rely on these people.
Noted for next time. But in a real world scenario this is how the phones would be set up. You can't always just turn off all new features and cater to lowest common denominator as that's not real world. People with a s20 will mostly use it at 120hz
You're not buying a 120hz phone and use it in 60hz. This actually tested the phone in real life situation.
The actual heck is Samsung doing?!?! They need to fix every flaw of the S20 with the Note 20.
They'll use different chipsets next year, so Note 20 which will be released this year will have same destiny like current Exynos phones.
I've left samsung because of the poor battery performance... Since the end of February I got an OnePlus 7T Pro and it's awesome! With Samsung i couldn't get more then 3 hours of screen on time. Now with my OnePlus 7T Pro I can get around 8 to 9 hours of screen on time. I'm happy that I made the switch. :D
Same here using 7T Pro dude, easily getting over 8 hours of screen on time consistently
I consider that bad because I get up to 13+ hours of sot with my Huawei phone.
@@MAFz7 okay but I don't like Huawei 😂
But that SOT is awesome! What Huawei phone do you have?
That's great battery life from OnePlus. I think at 60hz and FHD resolution it would have beat the Apple, even with a slightly larger screen. Would have a s20 Ultra right now if it wasn't for the exynos. Just pre-ordered my OnePlus 8 pro!
I think the difference in screen refresh rate has made a huge difference in battery consumption.
I think its time to move to apple
INSANE CAMERA
INSANE PERFORMANCE
INSANE OPTIMIZATION
INSANE BATTERY
INSANE SUPPORT
Yes Insane price but considering all of the above things is kinds justified
60 hz screen goodluck with that
@@Saidinho10 do U need 120 hz to game on your phone lmao
Ewww Only 60hz
Pai Mon u don’t even have the phone idk why ur bragging
@@paimon7911 all 120hz phones have huge batteries so they should optimize their software and if you can't give the excuse
If your implementing a 120hz display optimize the software and make sure it gets good battery
It's 120hz is just an excuse for android fans to crap on the good studd of apple
"The one plus 8 pro will never die"
*dies immediately after*
What? It died half an hour later...
The endurance on that thing is impressive
I remember always wanting the Exynos version but in recent years nope.
Right? Lol
Recent years? I own s9 plus exynos version and this phone has been a disappointment. Surely, it turned heads in the first year because of looks. But the performance has been very bad.
@@harshpranami7802 Yes Samsung S9 exynos sucks. The battery life and performance is terrible. Im very happy with my Oneplus 7 pro now. Very snappy up until now even it is a 1 year old phone and battery life if good.
@@harshpranami7802 After s7 exynos sucks.
@@Kotoamatsukami6910 exactely cause i still have my 4 years old exynos s7 edge now that i see what exynos had became 😓
I have been waiting for this test. You are the best youtuber!
I would be interested to see them all at 60Hz but I must say, I am impressed with the iPhone. Historically I've never been an iPhone fan and I still prefer Android, but I do admire, to an extent, Apple's strategy of sticking with a similar design for a few years and focusing all of their attention on the things that matter, like performance and battery.
Imagine a phone with an extra 1000 maH but because of the chip it lasts 3 hours less than a phone with a smaller battery 😂
Why is that iphone there? Put them all on 60hz and 1080p , just to see the results.
But you are not gonna use them that way
thats true
@@saitama2508 Irrelevant. It's not a direct comparison unless the other devices match the iPhone display settings as closely as possible.
If the OnePlus 8 Pro can beat the iPhone 11 Pro Max when it's at 1080p 60Hz, then it clearly has superior battery life. Just because it empowers users to up their display settings shouldn't penalise it and prevent it from winning the competition. Otherwise you incentivise manufacturers to provide the lowest possible display settings.
@@bryncb Nah, you just wanna see the OP 8 Pro win
Bojan Mitreski bahahaha
iPhone 11 Pro Max is the best for me
Very helpful video 👍
And a camera comparison of all these flagship would be a nice idea
Am I the only one who wants to see a battery comparison when the phones are at their default settings? 😩
Just imagine what if iphone has 5000 mah battery 🔋!
It’s all about optimism
The phone is a app drawer it has no real festures
It doesn't though , people will keep saying what if what if until apple decides to put a bigger battery .
I phone don't have higher refresh rate, 😭
Virus The Gamer
But it still won though. Cry harder
When iphone puts 5000mah battery , every other phone would be having graphene batteries . 😂
*The Tech Chap:* ofcourse I want this to be a fair fight so all the settings are the same...
*sets iphone to 60hz and every other phone to 90/120hz
Lol and then set the One Plus and OPPO to dynamically refresh. The only one at a disadvantage is the Samsung locked at 120
Samsung:120hz
Huawei:90hz
IPhone:60hz
It's unfair.
But oneplus Pro was at 120hz, so what gives?
Hello ? OnePlus: 120 Hz + QHD, AND smaller battery than Samsung. Quite fair.
Damn oppo kind of surprised me. A relatively small battery with that huge 120hz qhd display and it still did surprisingly decently. That variable resolution probably helps battery life a lot
Iphone : what is big battery?
Samsung: uhm
🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️ 60Hz?
To be honest, you must keep everything at 60hz display, i mean its a cool feature that the other phone has the higher refrest but it kinda unfair because iPhone is at 60hz while the other phone is in their higher refresh rate
for the sake of fairness? yes, kinda.
But for the realistic test? I think no. For everyone who bought flagship with higher refresh rate, there's no point decrease the refresh rate, that's such an exclusive feature... I already used to 120hz in my daily phone, and I would absolutely not decrease it for better battery life, do you understand this point of view?
Well, I still understand why ppl want the test to set on same level refresh rate, for the sake of fairness, but that's really not realistic in my opinion. I think, the test should held in the best possible condition for each phone, I bought 120hz smartphone, so then turn it on seriously! Don't you think so.
Or...just make two or more videos then lol, one video for the default screen out of the box, then the second test is using the same level 60Hz as ppl wish. Tho I care more for the first video, if you ask me
Thank God I didn't get the s20. To charge 1400 with a huge battery and a crap battery life is mind boggling. Samsung have lost the plot.
i wouldn't say 8 hours is crap but i agree with you it should have at least beat the oneplus8 pro considering it runs at full resolution plus 120 hrz
@@doniamer2009 well not crap but remember not long ago people were trashing the pixel 4 due to its battery. Well they look pretty stupid now imo as it outlasted the new s20 ultra which costs a kidney.
The best value for the money in a long run is the iphone
Only run at 60hz🤣
If all this phone run at 60hz then maybe the samsung is the winner here or the OnePlus 🤣
@@NzyDray I think oneplus wil destroy them al oneplus has the best battery optimazation of al Android phones
What will be the result for all at 60hz
GOOGLE You Beauty: I still remember the time all the tech guys were so hard at that Pixel 4 XL for its battery. ( Now Pixel 4 starts at $499 and it's a steal. )
With a 60 hz refresh rate is it even relivent to use the iPhone in this test it had the advantage of not being upto scratch for the test, there software is great but it's always last years or the year befores hardware optimised chipset but a failure to innovate and inspire anymore!
Do an all 60hz pls!
A great test! Thank you for the video, it was informative and interesting to watch.
Exynos, 5000 mAh battery... That's just "wow", but from negative side ))
the fact that Samsung is still using Exynos instead of SnapDragon (outside of US) is mind bogglingly.
Now time to charge this all devices video
All at 60 would be great to see!
Noted for next time :)
@@Thetechchap i think it will make a clear comparison as we all know that 120hz will be more consuming than 90hz and 60hz
Would probably not change much but yeah I would be keen to see this to
@@Thetechchap when will the video come out at 60hz?
@@osiristweet73 Well, according to some reviewers, the 90hz and 120hz drains more battery compared to 60hz. Just like how dark mode save your battery
Skip the iPhone in this test or set all the phones to 60hz.
agree
Random Compilations but to be fair, iphone 11 has only 3900mAh.
@@jccpa2728 display refresh rate and lighting consuming most battery capacity.
@@nicon82 good point
Remember when pixel 4 only had 4 hours screen on time
And thats why I dont trust tech reviews they use the phone 2weeks ( you know who I mean ) and switch to another one
The real winner is the 499$ pixel for me
Pixel 4 did amazing with the 90 hz on now imagine when they finally add a bigger battery with the pixel 5
its about contents tested other reviewrs use heavy stuff like benchmarks over and over wish reduce screen on time it is about how well the phone performe versus other phones screen on time doesnt mean anything also 2 weeks means battery is 99/100% healthy also pixel 4 is 2800mah battery wish is weak for 90hz (not a winner) u can get fhd+ 120hz 6000mah zenfone 6 camera and +++++ for 480$ (rog phone 2)
Wonder what the screen brightess would change if anything. You need to run the pixel at max on the day to day.
@@Abujound I know but the software is not good alot of problems with the android 10
A problem you will never have with the pixel
@@UnknownGamer-uz5iz rog 2 use stock android like pixel oneplus use oxygen os wish is better than stock android, but if it is samsung one ui and huawei i agree with u stock is better
One like, one comment and one subscribe from my side.. just because of your 11 hours.. you spent 11 hours for this video ! Salute man.
Well, obviously everyone likes this tests, including myself. It helps a lot deciding what phone to buy. However regardless if it´s default that some have 120hz display and Iphone 60Hz, the truth is that it makes a lot of difference and I don´t think is a fair comparison. Specially because some of the 120Hz phones, it is possible to swap to 60Hz. Some people may use the 120Hz when they are at home, and 60Hz when they need to travel or something. Good test anyway and we appreciate the work :)
I phone user hit a like💥❤️
I Love A"Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max"So Much Better 👍😊💙💙💙💙💙💙
People will never accept that IOS is the best OS ever made
*Now, imagine apple adding another 500mah to the Pro Max!!!*
*damn! that would the ultimate battery phone!!*
It was on 60hz vs 120hz but yeah its an amazing performance for a 4000mah
It’s insane. Apple’s battery optimization is unmatched
@@Racko. iPhone was running at 60Hz on a small screen with 4G, at 120Hz with a bigger screen+5G it'd still be among the last ones if they add 500mah the price will jump $500 lol.
Could you please try the low refresh rate on op vs the iPhone?
Huawei p40 pro beat s20 ultra in battery also😅
if i was on the test i would came first maybe in 15 sec
Add a stand by test so is true to real life (and you take a nap)!
Here's something that more incredible than how trash is exynos chipset is, there are some issues that the next pixel phone which is Pixel 5 will rocking in exynos chipset :)
LMAO if pixel 5 fails pixel is done sadly
The pixel 5 will still be running snapdragon. The Pixel 6 will be running an in house chip made by Google, in collaboration with Samsung, NOT the exynos chip
Amazing video, I suscribed
The real winner...
The phone thats doing the timer
Aahahaha
Damn iphone 11 pro max 🔥
Tech chap:- this is going to be a fair test
Also tech chap putting a 1080p 60hz phone in the test and declaring him the winner😑
Either you set all phones at 1080p 60hz and then include the iPhone
Or keep all phones at 90/120hz and just skip the iPhone in the test
Cause you are just confusing and misleading those people who doesn't have much tech knowledge
And also you are blindly giving apple credits for its efficiency while you yourself don't know the efficiency level on other phones
M sure the iPhone will loose badly when all phones will be set to 1080p 60hz
Didn't expect this from you
Time to unsubscribe you
That's exactly what I was thinking.
Divyesh Sinha clearly mistaken. iPhones have the best efficiency when it comes to battery optimisation and low power requiring cores in the new A13 Bionic. So it won’t “LOSE* badly” as you said.
@@venkatkandukuri4924 why do you think so
Only Cause apple told you?
All these years apple used to loose battery test
They were efficient before agreed
But are they still efficient?
It's a debatable topic with the 11 pro max
At present you are just guessing
Let's hope some guy
Some guy makes a battery comparison video with other phones at 1080p 60hz
Screw exynos
Exactly 😈
Can you import snapdragon with no issues?
Plot twist the desk had hidden wireless charging coils in it
I think the winner is between ONE PLUS 8 PRO and OPPO FIND X2 PRO. Large display, higher refresh rate with QHD+. Only a difference is a battery. followed by Huawei, then Pixel 4XL, then S20 Ultra and iPhone 11 pro max in the last.
Also, I think a fair comparison was supposed to be, all devices set to 60Hz at FHD+.
Mi 10 pro ?
The real winner: OnePlus 8 Pro
no the real winner is the iphone
Iphoneeee❤️❤️😂😂
I think few people realize that current phones are so powerful, you can easily keep them in "Power saving" mode.
With my current phone, I never went out of "Battery Saver" mode. Because the performance it's all the same in daily tasks, .but the battery is upped a lot.
Maybe you should do a max performance vs battery saving mode battery longevity test.
Wow!!! This is the best phone comparison i ever saw 👍👍👍👍👍