You’re Being Awkward What Is Your Name…..
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 22 май 2024
- Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @pinac-audit
buy me a drink: www.buymeacoffee.com/pinacaudit
➟ Disclaimer: the Video Clips Used in This Video Are Not Owned by This Channel & , we post it for criticism and review purposes only.
help me get to 10K subscribers
my instagram / pinac_audit
my patreon: patreon.com/user?u=81786767
original video • "Any Breach of the Pea...
channel / @pureaudits
thank you for 8000 subscribes.
this channel is to expose corruption and get all discipline information on public employee's
Exceptions to copyright
Details of the exceptions to copyright that allow limited use of copyright works without the permission of the copyright owner. Criticism, review and reporting current events
Fair dealing for criticism, review or quotation is allowed for any type of copyright work. Fair dealing with a work for the purpose of reporting current events is allowed for any type of copyright work other than a photograph. In each of these cases, a sufficient acknowledgement will be required.
www.gov.uk/guidance/exception...
my videos take a long time because of all the research to get as much information as i can and FOI requests take time. I'm waiting of the results from a FOI request's and then ill be making more video's i don't want to just go and look for a reaction.
Please note: The drone flyer is NOT the producer/narrator
It's BP Visits.
Why did you give up any identification you didn't break a law sorry you melted.
Definitely she took a photo of his opperater id she can find out all about you from the CAA bit stupid .I M O
Agreed
Defo
I suspect he fancied one or both of them so there was a simping factor.
ATM 2021 Schedule 9 1) (a) (i) (ii) merely requires reasonable grounds that a flight is or has taken place.
The recommendation is to register the drone flyer ID in someone else's name.
STOP giving ID your make it difficult all other Auditors !!!
Exactly...all in all a very poor audit
Stop telling folk what to do ! Just nwcause you sit there w4nking off to DJ ya hero 😂 .
Not every Auditor is a total D1ck Head ! So he wants to ID. That's up to him !
The best on here is Charles Veitch. He always gives his name, he never hides his face, hes been on here longest and is the best.
I dont have to give my name, I look like a bank robber to intimidate people, is what the numpties do.
The police addiction for names is like a druggie for heroin.
Cop Crack
Trouble is not enough people know their rights and just do what the police ask. It should be police policy to say in these situations where no crime has been committed..."Can I ask your name? You're not obliged to give it to me"
Pure Audits needs to brush up on his drone laws..HE GAVE HIS ID WITHOUT REASON...
DECLINED to give details,always correct them.
Yet he did give them his details
You shouldnt have shown your flyer id. That just held you up, and now they are identifying you and putting you on a watch list.
Definitely
Yep. He wasn’t even flying , didn’t have to and shouldn’t have
no arrest no ID
Dropped a bollocks there fella showing the op ID
If the Police fined businesses for using 999 / wasting police time, they WOULDN'T do it again.
The big cop is gonna be a problem,as long as she is a cop.😢😢
Hopefully, she's no longer a cop.
A BIG problem 😁😂😁😂😂😁🤡
Keeps bull sh🤬ting 🥱🥱🥱🤮🤮🤮
She was not entitled to copy that operators licence.
She is, and she's also entitled to his name and address.
NEVER show the filth your operator ID..unless they have grounds to suspect a crime..they are NOT entitled to "just have a look"..while copying the numbers
Unfortunately that is incorrect. See Section 9.2 of the Air Traffic Management and Unmanned Aircraft Act 2021. A constable only requires reasonable grounds to believe that a drone is being or has been flown in order to check that it is registered per sub-section 9.2(3). The question of it being under/over 250g then determines the applicable distance it must be from buildings and people.
@@maunsell24 ONLY if they suspect an offense has been committed
@@stevedawg9588 So in other words,.... anytime they want 🤔😇
@@stevedawg9588 Incorrect, they can require you to provide details if they believe you are or have been flying...
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2021/12/schedule/9
Provision by remote pilots of information about UAS operators
2(1)A constable may exercise the power conferred by this paragraph in relation to a person (P) if the constable-
(a)has reasonable grounds for believing that-
(i)a flight by an unmanned aircraft is taking place or has taken place, and
(ii)P is or was the remote pilot of the unmanned aircraft, and
(b)has reasonable grounds for suspecting that a relevant registration requirement is or was applicable as respects the UAS operator for the unmanned aircraft and the flight.
(2)The constable may require P to provide such information as the constable considers reasonable as to the identity of-
(a)the person or persons who are or were the UAS operator for the flight, or
(b)the person or persons who made the unmanned aircraft available for use by P.
(3)In this paragraph “relevant registration requirement” means a requirement imposed by, or referred to in, any of the following provisions of the ANO 2016-
(h)article 265A(9)(b) (specific category: display of UAS operator's registration number);
He become a victim of his own stupidity ,he melted straight away..
Doesnt matter if they are young girls. Pureaudit needs to get a little more assertive. They sense your weakness and now trying to bully you.
There aw bullies,it's how there trained to treat the public,intimidate, frighten and do whatever it takes to get our details,fucking morons,what a complete waste of police resources, I thought police scotland were bad 😮
Blue lights for filming... That's resources well spent!!! By the time they've dealt with this "incident" possibly there's lots of actual crimes taking place!
Spot on m8,there just a complete embarrassment fae top tae bottom
so... they have established that no crime has been committed, and they still won't leave him alone? That is causing alarm, harassment and distress.
Not detained, walk away.
Just because they are police women you gave them EVERYTHING they ask for....poor audit 😞
Poor Zpolice idiots
Drone details are not required unless they are SURE THAT A CRIME HAS BEEN COMMITTED !
Why show your drones operator ID unless they believe you have broken the law?
If you haven't flown your drone - no offence!
You haven't got to prove your innocence. They have to prove your guilty of an offence....
Here’s a tip. You’re only required to display the operator ID whilst flying the drone.
As soon as it lands you can destroy it and just print another one the next time you use it.
Mate tell them nothing.
DO NOT let her take the details down.
Usually pure audits is OK. Total fail on this one though. I know he's newish, but has to learn on the job quickly. Gave to much information, talked to much, didn't pull the Constables up on anything. More concerned about gdpr? By handing operaters I.d. over if he wasn't on the prnc before, he definitely is now.
The state of those two women
Pure monsters
Never ever give those clowns your operator ID, you can show that you have it on the drone but they have no right to record it as you have just given your personal details away.
Wouldn't of got my drone id
I thought the law had changed recently and if requested you do have to give them the operator id??
@@Donotwillnot show them, not give them. It's there in case the drone is lost or causes a accident. They have no right to ask for it especially for ID purposes.
No crime has been committed.
@@alexanderevanska4274 understood i hadn't realised that. So they cannot ask for it just as a way to identify you? It must be because they believe a crime has happened? Im sure alot of coppers do use this to get id though? Thanks for that 👍
"Wasting police time" they do it themselves, WHY is it not a crime to waste PUBLIC time?
It is it a section 5 of the criminal law act 1967 subsection 2 it States. )Where a person causes any wasteful employment of the police by knowingly making to any person a false report tending to show that an offence has been committed, or to give rise to apprehension for the safety of any persons or property, or tending to show that he has information material to any police inquiry, he shall be liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for not more than six months or to a fine of not more than [F3level 4 on the standard scale] or to both.
They should av been gone by now,they are harassing this man now
@@pinac-audit I KNOW the law, he didn't call the filth, they did, THEY committed the crime of making false reports and wasting police time. What I meant is, the filth are ALWAYS wasting time attending NO CRIMES. A man with a cam.... Wasting THEIR time..and more important..OURS..
Blue light for a man doing a legal hobby. Yet phone up for a burglary and you'll be given a crime number to give to your insurance. Case closed. Off the books. 😡👊🙏🏴
Spot on m8,there an embarrassment the lot of them,fae the east coast of fife,oor polis are just corrupt fae top tae bottom and are involved in a lot of bad murky shit,never speak to these people,ever
Just tell them they are dismissed and go back to work.
I wouldn't even conversate with them and carry on about ma business, daftys the pair of them,no emergency, waste of time,total joke
Stop helping them trying to incriminate you. Before it bights you in the arse.
Young girls!!!! Soo bloody WHAT???? Equality.
WOW BLUE LIGHTS FOR A CRAMRA 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
Because who ever called lied about what was happening.
The person who called should then be arrested for wasting police time but they won't,divvies,the man's done nowt wrong
When they say are you willing to give me your name, you should say " I'm going t decline your offer"
Or , if you give me your address.
TELE TUBBIES IN BLUE
This need to be a lesson how to not doing things. He gave up his rights straight away. No of fence no name. No crime no id. Simple
Cars with dash cams going in...best tell them not to film young girls
“It’s a FREE COUNTRY. I have a RIGHT to be as awkward as I want and it’s NONE OF YOUR F’ing business” !!!! “Also, I’m not talking to you so GET LOST” ! Then SILENCE.
Once your given id out they will expect it of everyone 😮
They should’ve asked permission before deleting it. He’s committed an offence and these officers have done nothing? Jokers 🤡🤡
Dnt give id until charged
@18:06 PC requires consent to take a photograph of a Person , as
PACE 1984
section 64A
(1A) to take Photograph elsewhere than a police striation
(a) with the appropriate consent. ; or
(b) if the appropriate consent is withheld it is not practicable to obtain it,
case law :-
Wood v Commissioner of Police 2009
overturning high court decision, found Wood "right to privacy"b
had been infringed by taking the photographs by "retention of photographs " of Wood by Police
Note: :-
The "retention" of photographs was the key element of this case
👆🏻
hence even in the police guidance :-
code :- D512A
Photographs taken under PACE s. 64A
(a) may be taken with persons the consent
👆🏻
UNLESS (1B) A person falls within this subsection if he :-
(a) has been arrested by a constable for an offence;
(b) taken to custody
Section (6A)
In this section,
a "photograph" includes a moving image "
all the best 🙏
The Operator ID should not be given to the police unless you have been suspected for a crime. Also, it only gives the name of the person who owns the drone and not who flies it.
Why was he actually showing his drone ID
🎵Feelings......🎶🎶🎶 Never mind the LAW!
The security guard looks like he knows all about young girls - and probably young boys.
I dont understand why he let the cop take a record of his flyer id from the drone....knowing that they could check and get his details??
9:02 -Refused Details- Correct these clowns ---> DECLINED to VOLUNTEER details which are NOT REQUIRED and can not be COMPELLED ! 😉👍
ugh... why did he let her take a pic of his operator ID. He was not obliged to show them.
It's not illegal to record juveniles, it is illegal to record juveniles in a compromising situation. Dressing room, toilets, sexual nature, and distribution of such records. Juveniles walk the street and captured by multiple CCTV cameras of private and public buildings, traffic cameras, dash cameras and nobody, but nobody has a problem with that. Why is it only when a camera attached to a person it becomes a problem?
Good job he didn't run they were a little bit away from the car 🙄
No need to give name, but they always say you are being awkward
Be as awkward as you like.
Refused to give them their fix. That’s what she meant.
Always ask them why they need to know? They often say because you have to, then they come unstuck and disappear down the rabbit hole of section 26 offences!
Great review. I like pure audits 👍
Here come the brave girls in blue. Can’t attend a burglary but can harass a man with a camera.
Those cops really struggled, they tend to not know what being awkward or aggressive is.
Auditor why give up drone number, just say it is under 250 grams, nothing else. Give up ID only is Arrested. They only want your details to see if you are wanted.
Did blondie really say "i'm not a fan of being recorded" while she's got a bodycam switched on??? She also admitted he's doing nothing illegal, then fatty claims he's "refusing" to ID. It's like a French and Saunders sketch.
Never show them anything
The security guys are getting paid…..
You had zero legal obligation to give them anything so now they will write you up in an incident report with all your details which could hinder you in the future, never give pigs your details willingly because they use your information with malicious intent.
There breaking the law bye taking your flyer I'd when you haven't committed a crime
Rice v. Connolly (1966) is an English legal precedent holding that there is no strict, general legal duty to assist a police officer prior to any possible arrest or caution, with even basic police enquiries nor to accompany the officer to a requested location.
If he's not flying the drone then why give the number?, Just a sly way to id him.. If your not flying it then no need to give it...
My understanding is you dont have to give Operator ID
If your drone isn't up you don't need to give the I'd number
You gave up ID, not cool. Not cool
Agree%%%
Why aren't the Police questioning the Security plank about false reports and wasting Police time? Serious question
That would involve work!
No crime ,no id
cops in a cop car nearly ran me over. They demanded my name. I said why are you ON MY PRIVATE LAND & ROAD? They argued it was public, I said ok arrest me for walking on my own private road that serves my prive house. They drove off
Officers No Crime you dont have the authority to demand ID
So she doesn’t like being filmed but I bet she’s happy to film everyone else? Wrong person, wrong job!
Not legal it’s lawful what your doing
Bloody hell wake up! No offence has been committed so she has no right to see the drone take it's ID, nor does she have any right to question the auditor. Sorry, but I just don't understand this repeated infringement of people's rights.
Aaahhh, the guy with his big brother's suit on!
A Police Lie - We are very busy.
Remember the 5.8% success rate.
She never misses breakfast
seen as he admits to deleting the picture and breaching GDPR, I'd send the video to the ICO, make a complaint and get a payout from it.
I think the Information Commission needs to be brought into this, why is the Civil Aviation Authority giving police information without a Court Order, the Data they hold falls under GDPR
I think I would say oh I don't have a card, and see what they do then.
apparently the new drone laws have changed and says that you must give your op id when requested by police, so they can run it, i didn't know that, even if it isn't flying apparently, and even if no crime suspected, new rules, handy for the cops and just a bit biased imo.
"we've got young girls here 18/19"
And?
Nobody is spying on them, they are adults walking in public... Trying to make it something sexual is disgusting
Never talk to them they cant handle it 😂😂 remain silent as is your right
Very poor you need to put a piece of insulation tape over your operators ID they have no right to it unless you are committing an offence
I don't believe he had to give them his drone ID he only had to show he had one and not hold it for them to take a picture of it.
A concern is not a crime
Coppers still not accepting that we need thousands of people filming and recording everything it doesn’t matter about comfort as they are quick to inform us when they decide to stop and search, detain and question applying handcuffs which aren’t built for comfort. So let’s all abide by the law and forget about common courtesy it’s nice but not required legally. Keep the coppers under scrutiny at all times and report them the second they put a foot wrong.
You do not have to ID, giving them your flyer number IS being ID’d, you only have to show you have one. The security guard was acting from him own nature as most do. He is the one to be watched around young women.
These Police call outs for camera men are beyond... the even crazy part is they turn up on blue HAHA
I wouldn’t even talk to them.
Never give ID 😮 dont do it
I would definitely get a FOI request put in to their station and they need to learn more about the law and not waste their time e on this?
Why did you show your Operators ID...? You were NOT breaking any laws.
You gave your drone operators ID without having to but refused your name saying "I don't have to". They can easily get your name now you gave the OID. ? Makes no sense
Bad cop should be asking for that
Rear end talking cop
He was NOT INTERESTED in what you said whatsoever, he simply wanted his own way. He then pulls the young girl cards. Be very careful giving your I.D in these situations you never know what he will say.
I wouldn't give them the id. They will use it to identify you and put you on file as a "trouble maker"