Police Put In Their Place By DJ & PJ Audits
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 сен 2024
- Out and about with DJ Audits in Peterborough today we were stopped and questioned by Police.
At first there was just the one police woman, but soon another police officer arrived and joined in the conversation, and this is what happend.
Please enjoy the video
#djaudits #pjaudits
My Photography Channel:
/ @pjauditsphotographer7917
Q - What is your email address?
A - pjaudits@hotmail.com
Q - What Drone Do I Use?
A - DJI MINI 3 PRO
My Referral Link - amzn.to/3Fp8Thg
Q - What Camera Do I Use?
A - Sony ZV-1
My Referral Link - amzn.to/3JCVV1G
Q - What Bodycam Do I Use?
A - GoPro HERO11 Black
My Referral Link - amzn.to/3ZCNh97
Q - What Audio Mic For Gopro
A - GoPro Media Mod
My Referral Link - amzn.to/42mq7FU
Q - What Body Harness Do I Use
A - Chesty V2 - Performance Chest Mount (GoPro Official Accessory)
My Referral Link - amzn.to/3l9ODJz
Q - Where Can I See All Your Links In 1 Place?
A - LinkTr.ee
My LinkTree - linktr.ee/pjau...
2 police cars 2 police officers for a non-crime. Yet complain they are under-staffed. Try getting them to turn up when your house has been burgled. To busy for real crimes.
JUST TELL HER TO JOG ON !! I prefer people like yardley ski who tell them to FOXTROT OSCAR.
Me, too!
It's always from there perspective never from the law-abiding publics.
The quality of currently serving police is absolutely appalling.
Meanwhile 2 miles away a burglary victim has been waiting 6 days for a visit from the 'far too busy Police'.
Oh wow....where did you get this information from.... please share with the rest of us ie.... response time and workload....if not, keep your gob shut
@@andrewchild1592 It was a joke😂😂
Miss police woman Its none of your business why they are filming in public. Its perfectly lawful. They dont have to tell you so leave them alone.
They are pampering to big business which robs them on a daily basis. They could make more with a RUclips channel than their jobs.
She turned nasty, when you questioned her
Remember they are not your friend the more questions you answer the more they ask
Too true, tell them nothing, where did the other plod pop up from? Listening to him he will never get on the Chase because he didn’t seem very bright
No cop is anyone's friend , except another cop, maybe. I hope they are lonely.
@@ratman5229 anyone know a bright cop? Seems the only way they get the job is to be thick.
Never talk to the Police. Never trust the Police. Always film the Police.
@@davidlacey7982 Two questions are asked of prospective coppers.
Are you stupid ? And are you racist ?
If they get yes to both questions they’ll ask …
“When can you start ?”
"you can see how that looks from our perspective" ... from their perspective they should ask themselves is what your doing lawful and if so they should bugger off
If they were confronted with a lady wearing religious face coverings (no, this is not a racist, but a context question), would they approach it in the same way? They would not. They make broad assumptions about someone wearing a balaclava, which is not unlawful, and then conjure up spectres of terrorists without reasonable cause. The fact is police are out of touch with the people that pay them to protect society, and end up having the awful interaction skills so prominently displayed in these videos.
I like the way the PC says it’s not a problem when he is called out for not informing his BWC is on. 😂😂😂😂 as if he is letting DJ off! that’s nice of him. Ding dong
He spent the whole interaction looking confused then tried to act clever. It's almost as if nobody has ever answered back to the stupid twonks respectfully and it annoys them because there's nothing they can do.
DJ hound have replied, “it may not be a problem for you, but it is a problem for me!”
*should
SHE IS DOING SOMEONE OUT OF A JOB
did she have her car on idle for the entire time?
If they stop at the roadside, they have to. The system in the cars takes a lot of power, i.e., ANPR RT, and if they have put the lights on.
Marked units never get turned off. They go through three shifts a day. The only time they get turned off is when they go to the workshop.
@@No.Handle31well with all that hot air plods we’re pouting she/he needed the air conditioning on 🤭🤭🤭🤭
Hasn't read the Highway code. Shouldn't be stopped with engine idling.
Police with nothing better to do than expect stop and account from members of the public.
Do they get backhanders from business for a speedy response to the waste of taxpayers money?
Are the UK Police still on that bonus points scheme. If so you may well have a point.
My wife stopped at a zebra crossing.A man accused her of approaching the crossing too fast (He was drunk).She tried to explain she was not going to fast.He threatened her,shouted abuse and kicked her cars mirror off. I called 101 and they were not interested.They need to get their priorities in order.We are all fed up with them pandering to corporations.
Should've said he was filming her.
My co worker was assaulted and the police were not interested yet someone filming gets an immediate response from 2 police officers in different cars and filming in public isn't illegal, they wonder why the public have lost faith in them.
Theyre job is to protect the satanic pedophile ring that runs the world,
Why didn't you get out n knock his teeth in??, citizens arrest?....coppers aren't here to babysit us...I mean considering how shitty our economy is and how few coppers there are on the street, did you really expect the spg to turn up????
Thames Valley is the history of the Peelers.
They get 6 months training AND it shows. Pathetic really, 🙄
Even if Do-nuts received 6 years training they still wouldn't know anything in the end.
they need atleast 6 years.
you need to study for 3 years to get into IT. but only 6 months for Police? thats nuts.
She had no right to say you were evading her questions. Such ignorance...
Thick as shit.
I didn't think it was against the law to not answer intrusive questions. Her job is to jog on.
What do cops actually think their jobs are. This is not part of the social contract we agread to
6 months to become a copper 3 years for a hairdresser !!!!!!!
Says it all really!
Imagine that you’re driving and get stopped by the police and asked where you’ve been, where you are going and why ? Then you say I’m visiting friends. . . . but why are you doing that, how long have you been friends etc etc. The police really need to get to grips with how they interact with the public. Unfortunately, they tend to assume you are in the wrong and that they are always right.
Definitely agree 💯
Imagine all that then using the information to shut down trafficking gangs. It's funny how the people who don't want to speak to the police are the ones with things to hide.
Excellent comment, really puts that questioning in perspective.
More criminals join the force as its so easy to join and alot that have been in the force a long time have criminal records
@@SoupDragon63 not just lockdowns!! Every time I’ve been pulled over they always ask “where have you been where are you going”
I hate it when they say "can you see it from a police point ...... " they have lost the argument before they start so its just gonna end in cop splaining
Next time anyone gets burgled when you ring the police just say you there are two men out side flying a drone you will get 2 cars in minutes, no trouble😆
Telling them someone is smoking weed gets a speedy response too.
Next time the kids are out dealing or wrecking something get a drone and film them police should be out in a second.
One of my PET HATES is when people sit in their car on a sunny day with their engine running whilst stopped at the side of the road having a chat with some pedestrians - just like that silly policewoman did for the best part of 20 minutes! GRRRRRR!!!! You should have picked her up on it!
illegal in many countries
100% Agreed
Point well made 👍
Couldn't agree more! She should have the common sense and decency to park her vehicle and approach people on foot if she wants to engage in conversation.
It’s obvious by this cops attitude that she received little or no training about public photography.
She probably specialises in a different field. It's amazing how many people think that ALL police should know ALL the laws.
@@juliandavies1974 She knew enough to hint at terrorism
It’s obvious by this cops attitude that she received little or no training. There, I fixed that for you.
Perhaps she was more importantly trained in preventing and responding to emergency calls from the Public for help you wanker
@@juliandavies1974f she is asking questions about a specific topic eg photography and or drones then the onus is on her to do due diligence first before making herself look like a muppet…….but hey ho this is the standard we expect nowadays…
It is never just a conversation, it's an interrogation.
Interrogation mixed with fishing.
I'd like to see DJ experiment with remaining silent, not assisting in their investigation, not totally silent, but let them know he doesn't have to explain everything.
Policing by it's very nature is about asking questions - it's hard for them not to do it.
Not it’s not to she just doing her job
Anything you say can & will be used against you in a court of law 🤫
@@tonyjlorns1727 this is not their job. Is this really how you want your police spending their time and your money? Stopping law abiding citizens to try and protect businesses from nothing unlawful?
Never speak to the police enough said.
Not even two minutes in and the "terrorism" card has been played. If she genuinely thought you were terrorists, would casually idling in a car with one hand on the wheel be the appropriate response to such a danger?
I believe they are supposed to disengage and call the terrorist squad.
It's because they are the terrorists, and they know it. They are desperate to label others with it to make themselves feel better. What a state our police are in.
I wish the people who had planned and done recon for the Manchester bombings had been stopped. But the probably did public photography without hoodies etc... but if they hadve been question, things may have been vert different.
@@juliandavies1974 pretty sure that there was Intel on those guys but sadly it still happened and shouldn't have. The police recourses should be used for one purpose only instead of wasting time handing out fines. They have one duty and that's to up hold common law. No harm bo loss no breach of the peace. If only they did this.
@@Dephective1 correct
She Policing feelings and not the law.
not only the male broke policy and guidelines by not informing that he was recording on his BWC but also the female because she covertly transmitted the entire conversation via her radio, probably for voice recognition purposes
notice her adjusting the gain of the microphone multiple times and the screen of the radio staying active the entire time
Where's the policy about the radio?
Policy and guidelines only seem to take affect when it's in the youtubers favor.
@@juliandavies1974 believe me police act on policy that suits them 1000s of times a day, stopping and searching members of the public, just one point.
@@juliandavies1974 When its on public ground of course it is , these police just dont know/or ignore laws .P.C- live life fully .
My god, you are so paranoid 😂😂🤡
Isn’t there a law about leaving your car on idle??
Two Police cars for this when they won't even turn up to actual crimes. We'll have to start adding "and they had a drone with them" whenever we report anything in future....
they do turn up to crimes though.
@@yetidodger6650 not in my recent personal experience I'm afraid. I understand that Police resources are scarce but this makes it all the more frustrating to see them waste time due to the paranoia that a camera seems to ignite.
@@yetidodger6650 They don't. I live on a main road, which is part of the city wide ring road, just over 1 mile from the main central police station.
I've reported countless things over the years, which I've seen out of my window like:
Car crashes (there's been at least 8-10 in the last 4 months in the exact same spot), roof tile theft, criminal damage, attempted car theft, fights, fights with swords & machetes etc
It's roughly 50/50 whether they turn up or not.
Even when they do turn up, they're useless...
With the 2 separate sword fights, with 2 separate households, which happened in the last 5 years, no armed Police were sent, and no ambulances were sent.
They sent just a couple of unarmed female cops, who had a quick chat which lasted no more than a few minutes, with people in the gardens of those households, then left.
They didn't take any written statements from them or me.
They didn't arrest anyone.
And they didn't confiscate any weapons.
Even though there was blood everywhere on both occasions, and I specifically mentioned both the machetes and the samurai swords on the phone
@@yetidodger6650 took them 3 days to attend an old lady in my street whose door was kicked in and house burgled....
@@davidelderbristol the auditing of most police stations suggests that police resources are far from scarce - tens of cars standing idle for days on end, large numbers of constables immediately available to question people with a camera for half an hour....
Section 3.5.5 of police policy states they are contractually obliged to inform you they are recording under police policy and GDPR rules and regulations.
It’s a policy that ensures they don’t break a law, but the importance is lost on them.
Is the section 43 the only tool they use to question and try to criminalise and accuse men with a camera as terrorist activity on public property which is not a crime and this is without any evidence…don’t you just hate hand talkers lol😂…and what the police and business owners should understand you guys are supplying a public information service and good or bad publicity for businesses something we wouldn’t see on a daily basis thanks guys 👍🙂be safe
No 43 is not the only tool, they also abuse PACE, sec 5 public order as often as possible.
@@Tiny-TimThey use section 50 even more as that's one of the only ones that details are to be given.
@@Tiny-Tim I know what you mean but the first one they always pull out the hat is section 43
If they don't want their building filming, they shouldn't put it in a public place. Are we supposed to close our eyes if we walk past it?
yeah never any logic to that. they put a ''private'' building in middle of the town and expect ppl to avoid it or what? lol.
if its so secret then put the building in a secure and secret location where nobody can enter.
You were filming a news organisation in public? and, they complained to the police? ROFL
Too much explanation lads. You need not talk to her at all
Yep
20mins with the diesel engine running. It’s easy spending other people’s money
Love PJ's comment in the final 10 seconds! 🤣🤣
You guys were so polite to the woman cop answering her endless stream of silly questions (and her suggestion of terrorism), because she doesn’t appear to understand that you are not obliged to answer any of her questions especially when conducting a legal activity. I bet she questions her partner as to why they spent more than 3 minutes in the toilet😀.
Seemed to be sitting all that time with the car engine running wasting fuel,not even the decency to turn it off.
@@DavidWilson-hh2gn Greta thunberg wouldn't be pleased lol 🤣😅
I’m under the impression that if cops actually knew their job and the boundaries that they are supposed to abide by there should’ve been no interaction with either PJ or DJ. Why is it so hard for cops to recognize what public photography looks like and the drone laws?
Stupidity.
Because they don't care what the law is - they want to protect the establishment. End of.
She thinks she’s a master detective. Thinks. Hence the uniform, and lack of stripes.
They do know their boundaries but prefer to cross same boundaries on the assumption that the general public do not know their rights, they also prefer to assist private corporations rather than helping the public.
Corporate clownery.
What a Karen that WPC is.
The confused look on Herman monster’s head is hysterical it’s like he is doing complicated physics
🤣
Mouth breather was my first thought when he arrived.
The control room operator should have just told the complainant that what they reported is legal and that should have been that, but no doubt the complaint was embellished.
which is why there should be a comeback for "aggravated complaints"....
What an absolutely darn useless police woman, she'd be better off getting a job in McDonalds with the kids flipping burgers. She got schooled there by her male colleague on how to engage with the general public
I wouldn't trust a burger produced by her !
She's not qualified to flip burgers.
Why didn't she turn the bloody engine off??
She's an entitled little baggage!!!!!
She had to keep her hoofs warm.
The more the video goes on, the more that idling, fishing, tired and/or uninterested, Joanne Froggatt-a-like, female cop, angers me.
She gets annoyed when questions aren't answered, which they don't have to answer.
She mentions section 43.
After DJ has explained that they were filming in a public place, she rudely starts talking on the radio.
She says she's not satisfied with their answer of filming in a public place...
She carries on fishing for details of why they're filming and where the footage will be going.
She assumes they've been on private land.
Claims she wasn't fishing for details, when she clearly said "What's the website?" just 26 seconds earlier.
Still wants to know what it's for, even though it's none of her business, and is irrelevant.
After PJ has explained they film businesses usually on industrial estates, and DJ explained a scenario of why you might film a company, she assumes it's some type of revenge, and gets annoyed with DJ for correctly pointing out her fishing attempt.
She clearly wasn't happy about having to provide her details, especially as she hadn't got their details.
She gets more and more annoyed, admits she isn't interested in learning about drone laws, and only wants to know the reasons for lawful drone filming.
Then the male cop uses the repetitive line...
"You can see it from our point of view" No, no I can't! It has nothing to do with you.
Doesn't announce he's filming, and says " It's not a problem."
I would answer every cop question with, "It is none of your business. Go tell the Police time wasting company, that members of the public are allowed to film anything they can see from public." And I would point out the idling too.
" My job is to find out " she says , it's her job to KNOW THE LAW before she sets out in that police vehicle . Thank goodness for auditors as yourselves showing us how clueless the police are . You wiped the floor with those two clowns .
I'm really puzzled about how these people function in life because of the weird way they think. Their questions and the way they absorb information in the answers they get just baffles me. It's like the sun is out so it's daylight and they ask why is the sun out.
You're easily baffled
This unfortunately is the lamentable level of policing you get when the minimum educational requirements to be a PC is just 2 GCSEs and 18 weeks training.
Dont confuse GCSEs with intelligence.
And just 2 x grade C GCSEs (basically being able to spell your name😀).
Another great video pj @ Dj 👍👍👍
We should change the “POLICE” badge on the uniform to “MAKING KARENS HAPPY”.
Or I'm a thick lying coward with an over inflated ego.
The biggest problem with police is they are of a different mind set than anybody else. Police must establish control of a situation first, then they arrest, investigate charge or not. Completely different to us non Plods. You handled it well.
They are trained to take control of a situation and establish if a person has or is about to commit an offence. The problem with the premise of taking control, is that Rice V Connally 1966 means there is no legal obligation for member of the public to assist the Police prior to arrest or caution.
Thus, when the Police (as in this case) make the claim that avoiding to answer a question raises suspicion, they are actually acting contrary to Rice V Connally 1966.
I disagree. These pair of Audit Muppets provoke a response for Thier shitty little channel....I wonder if PJ is on Welfare Benefits as he never seems to have a real job yet advertises his cheap Tat merchandise for exorbitant prices..and if this income is disclosed ?
@@andrewchild1592 In regards to your first assertion, your premise is, "provoke", which is to stimulate a reaction from someone.
I reply that, they are exercising the right to engage in lawful activity in a public place. If someone feels provoked by a member of the public exercising the right to engage in lawful activity in a public place, then the issue lies with that person feeling provoked, rather than with the lawful activity itself. Further, they don't even choose to engage with people, instead, people choose to engage with them.
In regards to your second assertion, your premise is whether they are working or claiming benefits.
I reply that, this is incongruent with whether they are exercising the right to engage in lawful activity in a public place. Whether that activity is lawful, is predicated upon Parliament prescribing or proscribing that activity. Whether they are working or not, does not determine Parliaments decision on that activity.
To summarise, your argument is made up of two premises which are both personal attacks. Therefore, both assertions are Argumentum Ad Hominem.
Seems the police are a problem, it's their own fault for being so egotistical and lieing all the time it appears.
@@mousecoder1306 indeed they are.
We’ve nothing to fear with these muppets looking after us , have we ???
Hopefully then they are not around when you need them then....just call PJ instead
@@andrewchild1592 Cops are never around when needed by the public. Getting robbed? Being broken into? Reporting a crime? see you in ten days maybe and here's a crime number. Cops are there for big business not for the general public.
I just do not get it, the collective of police chiefs encourage members of the public to take photos and video. As it can be helpful to the police to investigate incidents etc. yet the average rozzer will criminalise photography with the terrorist card etc within seconds.
that's an interesting thought - "I'm photographing my immediate vicinity in case someone commits a crime, for which the footage cpuld help the police."
She just cannot accept that innocent members of the public can take photographs and videos in a public place and insists that details should be given in answer to her inane questions. It was her who used the Terrorism word and when questioned about that quickly had to backtrack. She needs to realise in order to invoke the Terrorism Act she must have "Reasonable Suspicion" - she tried it on and it didn't work.
Our Police are thick woke scared unicorns that do nothing to protect citizens from any crimes just stand in the city centers for corporate firms and buildings and wardens for concerts and rainbow festivals " even tho they have THousands of cameras and security" they are not police as they don't police anything
She cannot believe anyone could be as sad as these two!
Standing in a public place but sending a drone with camera into a private place is not legal.
@@TheBladereddragon Sorry my friend you need to read the CAA regulations for a drone under 250g. What was done is perfectly within the regulations and therefore legal.
What she can’t accept is her ego being butt hurt by the public not quaking in fear
Great tag team 👍🇬🇧👊
Showing the contempt they have for the people they are supposed to serve and who pay there wages.
Amazing how quick they come out for large business types but if a member of the public calls they takes hours to come, if at all.
@Paul Burke and its a shop.
Plenty at protests too
The fact police respond to businesses with their own (3rd world) security quicker than Doris who got burgled 3 days ago. 🤦♂️
Doris??, Doris????...who the fuck is Doris???....Nice straw woman argument....
Police wasting their own time again.
Just gotta love the 'intimidating scowl' the male cop was using. Cracked me up 🤣
It's disturbing how clueless the police are.
All she is doing is asking a simple question and these two dickheads are being argumentative and trying to be clever
Do you expect EVERY officer to know every law. I expect you know 100% every aspect of the job you do...
@@juliandavies1974 if I didn't I would get fired.
@jimdixon3131 well I work in a warehouse and don't know every job.
@jimdixon3131 so go on, what is it you do.
But your not really answering my question above are you.
Hello DJ It's nice seeing you on a video, I always hear you only on your videos, great job you guys are doing.
D j have they put a warrant out for assault on you n you When you were defending yourself ? Love the way you handled it btw and backed up with pj 🙂 keep up the good work guys
I do love the “obviously you can understand it from our point of view”. This is “obviously” the phrase taught when stopping and questioning people who are undertaking lawful activities.
Spot on. They are thr only people in the country that talk with that robotic mind controlled training.
So we are now aware these two need retraining 😂
FFS...do me a favour
In intelligence !!....let's start them off ....What letter is this ? 'A'
Not necessarily, I think PJ n DJ are well capable of auditoring 👍
@@king77703 I meant the po po
@@countrycoastlifeI always wonder why no one gets my jokes 🤔
It's time the police started simply telling the people who call them complaining about a member of public with a camera or a drone that it's perfectly legal. ....They are slowly getting there.
I agree if they are complying with the CAA legislation and guide lines
It’s like reporting someone for driving a car. So the next question should be, are they breaking any rules?
That’s far too easy!
You don't have the legal right to know anyone's business WPC - foxtrotoscar!
A bloke walking down the street in a pink tutu is unusual but perfectly legal.
You are obviously on mind altering drugs if you see that
not that unusual anymore unfortunately
PJ and DJ wrapped these two police constables in knots. They got a rude awakening and free education. 😎👍🏻
And wasted the officers time and prevented her from carrying out her duties. Just tell her what you're doing and she can carry on. She's only there because some building owner called the Police and she was directed to attend. You 'auditors' are simply there to antagonise people. GET A FU*KING JOB and earn the right to exist.
@@IanM18 I agree. These auditors actually delayed police car #2 from getting to KFC (16:32). Police car #1 couldn’t even be bothered getting out of the car. I’m pretty sure DJ and PJ are both employed.
Obvious that the playing field got a little too level for Phoebe and Chandler here...And it was fun watching the female emerge from the delusional haze that was making her think she was going to control the contact.
The lads together. Constructive conversation loved it. ❤
I did not think it was constructive. They let her ask stupid questions and PJ saying stupidly we are doing nothing wrong pathetic
You are both so concerned about proving your rights that you talk too much.....
Just ask them if any law has been broken and keep quiet......
"see it from our perspective", why, that's not my problem.
Police have stopped using BMW vehicles because a few have caught fire sending them to auction with holes drilled in the engine blocks. Maybe next time interrogate an officer about the scandal and see how they answer your questions. Could be interesting
They'll tell you they don't know and accuse the auditor of a hate crime.
in actual fact, bmw have declined to supply further police vehicles as a result of the bad publicity - the way they are used contributes to their breakdown and associated failings
Whats the police doing ? when a member of the public has to educated them, crazy, take care out there xcx
My opinion the male cop should be fired he acts more suspicious than you...he break his policies and then he want to bully you.
Bless her, she thinks she's making good points...
Amazing police turn up for a completely legal activity but when my neighbour plays music full blast at 3am there not interested. Great. Another amazing video guys. ✌️❤️👍👍👍
Next time just tell the plod your neighbour has a camera - they'll be round in a flash!
@@ClearLight1967 yh that's well funny but unfortunately true. ✌️👍
easy target- no danger in questioning an auditor though, your potentially irate neighbour may cause them more of a problem
@@lozziel9662 yh but isn't their true job to uphold common law. No harm no loss no breach of the peace. They have become a gang of money grabbers. But that's a whole discussion in itself.
@@maximan4363 yh I've gone down those channels and the landlord is kicking him out as I think he's behind on rent. And FYI I called 101 when calling the police I understand it wasn't an emergency.
Just as an experiment i would like an auditor to get a FOIR list of all the crimes reported whilst they are questioning you about a lawful activity. I think it would be interesting.
The time the coppers spent with PJ and DJ Joe Public was save from the coppers. That is a win.
I'd like an auditor to go to a travellers camp and document the good and bad they do.
You could start your own channel publishing that info.
@@juliandavies1974 Are the travellers paid with tax money?
@@juliandavies1974 you a bit racist pal?
Your best bet with the police is as soon as she said it lawful just say have a nice day and walk away because they will try to fit you up with something. It’s never just a friendly conversation you can easily walk yourselves self into getting nick very easily.
yep, they will try to question you until there is a suggestion of wrongdoing....
Am I breaking the law? No, goodbye.
Absolutely agree
Have these police not got anything better to do, such as arresting 14 year olds for dropping a book?
The inspector at the press conference never mentioned the death threat.
There is something truly insidious about the WPC bint - tell her to mind her own business and go catch some criminals if she can.
Brilliant... You both make a great team guys. 👍👍👍👍
Hi P J, this young policewoman is having a problem with you two, she seems to think that she has some proper reason for her concerns when in fact without any evidence of an offence she has no justification for her behaviour.
At the point at which she ventures into speculation this just digs an ever deeper hole and somebody needs to teach her to stop digging. For a variety of dodgy 'reasons' far too many cops seem to think that the public have to serve them not the other way round.
I will give her some credit for sitting there listening to you, it does make a pleasant change to encounter a cop who is not too rude and aggressive.
The second one rocks up and dives in when it gets to the bit about his camera he twitches and wriggles about a simple yes no answer to your legitimate question, he then give a typical torrent of cop-waffle about what you 'must' accept about them being silly.
I do still think that the service you provide with your observations and information is probably the best training they are going to get, really the Home Office should be paying you!.
Cheers, Richard.
Cop failed to inform him that his camera was on, also stood the whole time with his hands in his pockets... NOT ALLOWED lol
Car engine running all the time? Not very enviromently friendly
It's always good to see that plods protect the PMs rights to party and refuse to investigate the PM breaking the law, but nevertheless acost the public for not breaking the law by photographing in public.
They always look after their own their fellow tories.
😂 it’s in the bag love 😂
The thick blue line strikes again! “We can’t get anybody to you for 3 days as we are under-staffed!” Yer right!!!😂
He was chatting shit when he said they had something new delivered and was worried 🤣🤣
yep, even an idiot would realise that situation is of there own making, hardly a police matter....
That PC who came into the video @ 5:48 I suspect is a member of MENSA. They are also parked on double-yellow lines.
He is taking her out for a KFC lucky fella 😍
The police were completely disinterested when I had my car and a few years later, a bike stolen, yet they can quickly attend 'non-crimes'. The need to challenge professional, friendly and non-confrontational auditors is yet another area in which police prioritise the investigation of public concerns over genuine criminals.
Corporate enforcers, waste of space.
I’m surprised one of the big TV channels hasn’t done a documentary on the phenomenon of auditing!
They'd put it in bad light so best not ... Remember MSM propaganda machine
They are planning to ask Stacy Dooley to do a documentary to smear auditors as "far right criminals".
@@user-pf5xq3lq8i serious? 😂
it makes me so mad to see police wasting time when me or you ring them up to report some thing they have not got time to send any one out
She was a wee bit naughty ! Great video gentlemen .
No she wasn't, she was fishing...nit picking and assuming that she knew far more about any given subject
Hello 999 I've just been burgled.
Sorry we have no spare officers
so true
I actually phoned 999 last week for a bad motorway RTC, and the operator and me listened to a lovely engaged tone, the operator had to redial around to get me connected to police control. We even got, a recorded messages that they are too busy call back later,and then press for options. Finally the operator got me throu somewhere, and they had no clue of this motorway locations, and they had to get a paper map out to find the junction, which in fact is one mile away from a police hq.
Honestly guys you gave them too much of your time just say nothing illegal the balls in your court!
2 cars for photographers whilst victims of real crime get a crime number!
Its good that crime is at an all time low that two officers can stand around and engage so positivley with the public
Always remember, they can always escalate at any point and charge you with resisting