Medium Format Camera Hasselblad X or Fujifilm GFX? Analysis Point by Point - IN ENGLISH
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 июл 2024
- Medium Format Camera Hasselblad X or Fujifilm GFX? Analysis Point by Point - IN ENGLISH
#fujifilm #hasselblad #mediumformat
Versión en Español: • Cámara de Formato Med...
Version en Français: • Appareil Photo Moyen F...
Where to buy: Europe:
Digit-photo: dp.gt/a/pptpgf5nc (code créateur GIBAUD)
Fujifilm
gfx100ii: dp.gt/a/oemujaz9s
gfx100s: dp.gt/a/w3oma1wfl
gfx50sii: dp.gt/a/oaefzlyom
Hasselblad
X2D: dp.gt/a/aj0tvp49m
X1DII: dp.gt/a/b27v8spid
907xCFV100C: dp.gt/a/qmbkn5pvc
907xCFVII50C: dp.gt/a/846x4xey5
Paypal Donation: paypal.me/EricGibaud
Web: ericgibaud.com
Send questions to email: info@ericgibaud.com
Facebook: / ericgibaudphoto
Instagram: / egibaud
Twitter: @EricGibaud
500px: 500px.com/ericgibaud
K&F Concept:
USA: bit.ly/3CMrfb5
Smallrig: bit.ly/3HWuoYU
Viltrox: bit.ly/3uKZpXY
TTartisan: bit.ly/3I8NRSn
Neewer: bit.ly/3uGDQYe
Sirui: bit.ly/3V8Wvr9 5% Discount eric5
Meike: bit.ly/3js4rpJ
Ulanzi: bit.ly/3hXCiGP
Second hand gear: KEH
bit.ly/3HtNy7X
Westcott: bit.ly/3ZAl2J3
Sandmarc product code GIBAUD10
www.sandmarc.com/
Amazon USA: amzn.to/3gbGTnT
Westcott Flashes:
FJ80: bit.ly/3tOjH25
FJ200: bit.ly/3aZkbww
FJ400: bit.ly/3awGGbV
My products by K&F Concept
Carbon tripode BA225 bit.ly/2UKgeDw
Giant 2,40m tripod: bit.ly/39dbTg5
UV Protector Filter: bit.ly/3CYPFLq
Filter Holder Kit + ND1000 Filter (10 stops): bit.ly/3ijgQs1
ND1000 Filter (10 Stops): bit.ly/3ijgQs1
ND64 Filter (6 stops): bit.ly/3wCHkK4
ND8 Filter (3 stops): bit.ly/3wKsFMK
PRO System Holder: bit.ly/3m4MFaB
Circular polarizer: bit.ly/3kvlJjG
Natural Night Filter: bit.ly/36BSrbw
Magic Plate:: bit.ly/36BSwMm
Magnetic Filter kit: bit.ly/3ijhR3j
Graded filters: bit.ly/2VOJ6Lp
VND 2-400 bit.ly/3z75dv1
VND 2-32: bit.ly/3ok3EXB
VND 8-128: bit.ly/3L7clOF
Lens adapters:
M42 - Fujifilm USA: bit.ly/3CnELzr
M42 - Micro 4/3: USA: bit.ly/3CqkCcg
Black diffusion filters / Mist
1/1 USA: bit.ly/2WH2fPW
1/2 USA: bit.ly/3mLKh9T
1/4 USA: bit.ly/3kJDyKL
1/8 USA: bit.ly/2WH2Fpu
Aluminium tripod: bit.ly/3B5cRrr
Vlogging microphone and tripod kit
USA: bit.ly/3m9vmWM
Small Back pack: bit.ly/3B8MLnp
Large Back Pack: bit.ly/3mpsGUq
Sandmarc Product. Please use coupon ERICGIBAUD
Variable ND filter for camera: bit.ly/3k6kzuV
Lenses for smartphones:
Fish-eye: bit.ly/2YM6SZR
Anamorphic: bit.ly/2XfX0H5
Macro: bit.ly/39moeih
Tele: bit.ly/2YR6HfP
Wide: bit.ly/3Eg5zCT
Pouch: bit.ly/3Cdacf3
iPhone Pro case: bit.ly/3Ee7WpT
Stepup ring: bit.ly/3AcFGkW
LED Lights:
RGB LED: bit.ly/3hR7ww7
BI-Color LED: bit.ly/3hymTcy
Variable ND filter: bit.ly/3C9NO6k
Film Rig: bit.ly/3CfFRMK
Hybrid Filter: bit.ly/3C9Qh0A
ND Filters: bit.ly/2YNVRXY
My gear on Amazon USA:
Camera Olympus OMD E-M5 MK2 Silver amzn.to/2E9m45k
Camera photo Olympus OMD E-M5 MK2 Black amzn.to/2Ec9Zw7
Lens Olympus 12-40mm 2.8 PRO amzn.to/2U1zK9q
Lens Olympus 7-14mm 2.8 PRO amzn.to/2U4rfKz
Lens Olympus 60mm 2.8 MACRO amzn.to/2E8nnl2
Lens Olympus 40-150mm 4.0-5.6 amzn.to/2E2HBMU
Lens Sigma 19mm 2.8 amzn.to/2tBlM2o
Back pack Olympus CBG12 amzn.to/2E6y3Rg
Flash Godox AD200 amzn.to/2IzqnMX
Flash trigger Godox XproO amzn.to/2U1zYgM
Flash support S mount Godox amzn.to/2U43Nxa
Umbrella Wescott 2,2m / 7’ amzn.to/2Eti5So
Deep parabolic sofbox 90cm Godox amzn.to/2E7jxc4
Umbrella octobox 80cm amzn.to/2EtbnMv
Flash stand Phottix 200cm amzn.to/2tzLAvA
Flash Godox TT600 amzn.to/3bj09YA
Flash Yongnuo 560 III amzn.to/2Eu0R7C
Flash Trigger Yongnuo RF603C II amzn.to/2Etk4WQ
Gimbal DJI Osmo Mobile 2 amzn.to/2U0l7D8
Wireless microphone Boya by-wm6 amzn.to/2Vaqzn4
Microphone Comica VM20 amzn.to/35oR1AH
Microphone for iPhone Boya DM1 amzn.to/2Eu1E8A
Recorder Zoom H5 amzn.to/2U5Yayk
Tripod Benro IT15 amzn.to/2IC1noa
Mini tripod Manfrotto PIXI Smart amzn.to/2EsXoWN
Tripod Manfrotto 190X amzn.to/2EbLsaR
Manfrotto Tripod head 324RC2 amzn.to/2VatOLo 
Наука
Thanks for this exposé. I own 3 x GFX cameras and 8 lenses and have used Blad. Blad is soooooo slow and cumbersome. GFX outclasses the Blads in all areas.
Thank you for your feed back
Most honest comparison between Hasselblad and GFX system that is free of any Halo effect biases.
Thank you very much
wow, couldn´t agree more ! it is the first video I have watched about hasselblad x which does not mislead or tell plain lies as many of the (bought ) YT guys do. I´m very convinced hasselblad is kept alive with the smallest possible commitment so that DJI can use the name on their drones nothing more. when you see it this way everything makes sense. fuji on the other hand delivers very clever what pros need as they understand this is the most important group of customers for MF cameras.
Thank you very much
Different users have different requirements and priorities, objective and subjective. You don't have to be a paid shill, as you imply, to have a preference for the Hasselblad system. What examples do you have of the "YT guys" deliberately misleading people?
I haven't seen anyone of note denying that Hasselblad is smaller, less versatile, and has supply issues. These are entirely fair criticisms and good reasons for some - most - to opt for Fuji instead, before even considering the price. I don't think it's fair to suggest this means Hasselblad are being run as a minimum viable operation.
Personally, I'd also suggest that the most important group of buyers are the hobbyists - because they make up the *vast* majority of the people buying cameras and lenses, in *every* format. Indeed, the bulk of pro photographers would struggle to afford new mirrorless gear of any kind, let alone medium format. It is, sadly, not a well paid profession for most people.
@@BlazeFirereign hasselblad used HNCS as marketing claim long before the X but it was not a big thing before the YT guys started phantasising about color science. now it is one of the most praised advantages and then this fools show you images rendered with LR instead of Phocus. so all this magical advantage can be incorporated in a simple DNG profile build by adobe ? they also never talk about the missing AF-C option which is totally bogus considering how important this is in combination with eye af. every motive benefits from this feature exempt absolute static ones but on YT this gets downplayed.
in the film days most MF user had been amateurs but this has changed with digital. hasselblad sells at very low numbers compared to fuji and almost no pro buys into this system for the reasons Eric laid out. having a relative large body and than sticking small lenses with compromised optical design on it does not makes sense either. also not having a line of excellent zoom lenses is a big disadvantage too the folks excited about the V logo and lens design never touch....
Great video! As a user of the GFX 100 and GFX 100II, I’d like to hear more about how you achieve accurate color in flesh tones
hm, you definitely don´t want accurate skin colours... but anyway , correct WB ( with a color checker) is a key point
Eres un crack! Glad to see that there are some outthere that still point out the nasty little details. Almost pulled the trigger on a 907x due to the size factor but the size of the new lenses made no sense to me unlees Blad hirred an alchimist that defies the laws of know phisics. Thanks for confirming all that I have learned over decades of buying/using photograpy gear and thanks for the heads up!
I think your criticisms of Hasselblad are largely fair. It's certainly not the right system for most people. The GFX system is substantially less expensive, more versatile, and has more certain backing behind it, for results that are very similar at the end of the day.
But I do think there's a place for the X system, for some photographers. It does offer a different shooting experience, one that I personally find far more enjoyable than any other offering, especially with Hasselblad's focus on compact, lightweight primes, an area where I think Fuji are lacking. But I'm just a hobbyist, and I can put up with the difficulty of getting lenses.
I think one key thing for any photographer, hobbyist or professional, is to evaluate whether a system does what they need *now,* instead of buying into a system and expecting future firmware updates and lens releases that will meet their needs.
I would like to comment on weather sealing, and to play devil's advocate here: I *suspect* Hasselblad's approach here is to avoid saying "weather sealing" unless the kit is actually IP rated, to discourage use in harsh conditions. To my knowledge, Fujifilm don't IP rate their gear - and if your Fuji kit experienced any problems due to water or dust ingress, they would brush off any complaints or warranty, just as Hasselblad would. The same is true of any other camera manufacturer. And there are cases of "weather sealed" cameras, lacking an IP rating, that have experienced ingress problems, like the Sony A7III which had problems with its battery door.
There is certainly some consideration for weather sealing with Hasselblad, with visible gaskets on lens mounts, batteries, and port covers, and the XCD 28P is actually IP52 rated - although it stands alone in this regard. The only manufacturers that IP rate lots of their kit are OM System and Leica, and they're the only ones that I'd expose to rougher weather.
The 120 mm is a beast of lens, thanks for sharing
Thank you for sharing your opinion
I'm buying the HB 907x 100c and I don't care if it has no ibis as long as you are able to use the proper shutter speed in relation to the focal length. I've always used Leica M cameras (M11 recently) which have no ibis and in 10 years I had zero issue by just applying the above rule. On my Nikon Z9 and Leica SL2 ibis is often off as I never shoot handheld below a safe shutter speed due to the excellent high ISO capabilities of modern sensor. Hasselblad AF is worse than Fujifilm but if I need a good AF and I'm a pro, I always choose Sony/canon/nikon not really Fuji. Fuji offers several colour profiles but no proprietary raw converter whereas HB can benefit from Phocus. If you are a pro, colour science is the main "goal" to achieve. HB has a slower pace for sure but gives a colour science that no other camera brand can provide. As to weather sealing, no camera brand unless Leica declares an IP rating, not Sony, Canon Nikon nor Fuji. HB X2d is weather sealed and also 907X (it's even declared on the spec sheet on their website) but to a lower extent. I do agree on poor firmware update strategy by HB, they should improve this aspect.
Well… you make several mistakes… OM SYSTEM does indicate IP rating.
Canon, Nikon and Sony do indicate weather sealing, Hasselblad just does not say anything officialy about any sealing!
My experiencie is that I have no problem getting the same colors in Lightroom or Iridient with Fujilm as I get with Phocus with my Hasselblad.
IBIS on 100mpix is not the same strory as no ibis on a less resolution sensor…. With 100mpix and no ibis, a bare minimum is 1/250s… and if your idea is to use a 100mpix on a film Hasselblad, bare in mind that V lenses will not resolve the 100mpix, the 50mpix is far better option for that.
Thank you for your opinion.
@@EricGibaud First of all, it's nice to talk to you! You're right HB does not expressly state that it is weather sealed but the doors, the battery, and the rear of the lenses are rubber-sealed, which should make the X2D weather resistant. I used a OM system OM1, Nikon Z9 and Leica SL2 in heavy rain and I've always protected them with a cover, I'll do the same with my HB. As to colour profile, you should know that both Adobe and Capture One emulate the colour profile of different camera manufacturers but they only provide generic colour profiles. Phase one has C1, HB Phocus, Nikon NX, Sony Imaging Edge, Canon DPP, Fujifilm HAVE NOTHING specific and you must use LR or C1. As to IBIS, as you know, 60mp on 24x36 FF are equivalent to 100mp on 44x33 sensor, I had no issue with my Leica M11 (or my HB X1D with no ibis in 2018) and I hopefully won't have any issue with my 907x 100.
Yes, maybe Fujifilm should create their own software. Of course I do hope you will be happy with your 907. Have a great day!
Bravo et merci pour cette analyse, enfin la fin de la langue de bois.Hasselblad est ou malheureusement était une grande marque. Depuis la reprise par DJI c’est juste la catastrophe, délais sur produit( j’ai l’impression d’acheter une Ferrari) et manque de vision et de considération pour les pros. CQFD 👏
I don’t understand…I just watched your RUclips where you were ecstatic over the Hasseblad 907x50??
Hello. Yes, as I say, I am happy about my camera buy not happy at all about Hasselblad total lack of seriousness. No firmware update that were supposed to happen, no availability of lenses etc. This makes Haselblad an option that is not reliable if your income depends on your camera. I don’t see what you don’t understand. You maybe happy about your care until you discover there are no spare parts available for months if it breaks down.
Fujifilm had a chance to rock the market but opted to price the camera near the same price as a Hassel or a Leica.
it is cheaper than canon Nikon and sony high end cameras !
1/2000 sych speed is a big deal
Hasselblad has the superior colors of the two, so I purchased an older CCD 80MP Phase One instead. The mirrorless cameras are not well done yet in my opinion.
Thank you for sharing your experience
haha where do you folks get this BS from ?
Hasselblad is just too expensive ...
That’s why they are Hasselblad. Ever heard of leaf shutter? They are expensive to make. Know what leaf shutter does ? Allow sych at 1/2000 sec. That’s flash at 1/2000 which you can you with big aperture outdoors without need for HSS and big flashes
Not any brand can compare the Hasselblad 16 bit dept quality.
😂😂😂 gfx has the same sensor and same 16 bits 😂😂😂 built by Sony. actually gfx100ii and gfx 100sii have even more recent sensor than X2D. Please come up with other reasons for prefering Hasselblad, this one is not valid, sorry
..do you even understand the practical impact of more bit depth ?
@@EricGibaud Fujifilm are doing new things with the sensor - see Jim Kasson's excellent work figuring out what it's doing for ISO 80 - and may have adjusted the cover glass and microlens setup, but it's the same Sony IMX461 sensor found in the X2D and the first generation 100/100S.
This is not entirely correct. The focus speed between the Fuji and Hasselblad is depending on the lens combination. The Fuji with the 55mm is slower than anything while the the x2d and 907x 100c with the new xcd 55mm 2.5 is ok (blazing fast if you compare with the Fuji. On the other hand the Fuji 110mm is super fast against the Hasselblad system... Fuji does seem to have a better autofocus but only a few lenses can benefit from that. Next to that Fuji lenses are HEAVY and BULKY compared to Hasselblad. Then again Fuji is a better weather sealed. Last but least Fuji works better with other (fe Leica) glass. The leaf shutter on the Hasselblad makes it almost unusable (banding with artificial light and rolling shutter). So... each of them have their own advantages depending on your type of photography 😁👍🏼
Hello, thank you for sharing your experience.
@@EricGibaud Thank you for making these videos 😊👍🏼
no the hasselblad x2d 100 is simply not on the same level as a GFX 100II/sII even with the slowest lenses.
@mauriceijenders This isn't true at all. The GFX 100II has better AF performance with ANY GF lens, than the Hasselblad X2D with even the fastest Hassy lens. So what you wrote is pretty much the opposite of reality. The GF55 and GF80 are probably the slowest lenses in the GFX systems, yet they still perform better on the 100ii than anything Hasselblad can muster. That is because the AF performance of the GFX100ii is by far the best of any middle format camera. Independent of the lens. Fast AF lenses like the 110 only make the gap even larger. Edit: just to add. I am not knocking Hasselblad. I own Fuji GFX, but a colleague shoots only Hassy, and I have had good experiences with the X2D and an older 907/50.