@@Kireth Yes, early in the movie when Mardenborough joins a competition against pro Gran Turismo drivers, there's a big screen with all of the drivers' webcams, and you are one of those drivers. Thought you knew this. 🥰🥰
I don’t see anything controversial. Do you expect them to keep improving the game and the content at $30? I don’t know how much the DLC and season pass will be but at the moment this is a great sim for a very fair price
Pay is ok and this game it diserves, but I hope it won't be early access anymore, otherwise this is kind of scam (they sell products and if any problem "is early access")
I see a lot that is controversial. All the important core features they actually promised, like asynchronous racing, aren't in. It's just an early access game - yet they're selling DLC's, tracks and there's even a season pass... But I guess it's fine, gamers have accepted total defeat. 🤣
I would like to add two more things: 1- I am one of the lucky people for whose the game runs smoothly since day 1, so pay for dlc wouldn't be wrong. But I know very well I am minority and dlc for early access games is not right, not even logic to expand a game before finish it. 2- Motosport games is not a little indy studio who need the support of the community, is a full grown company, so make the game functional for the majority of players before ask for more money should be a must.
I got no problem paying for extra DLC for updated content, however I don't think they should be able to sell DLC and season passes whilst still hiding behind Early Access.
I completely disagree that it’s “okay to charge for “DLC” that’s supposed to be in the game. Maybe for some other games, “yes it’s ok to charge a bit”, but sorry, not Le Mans Ultimate, they should be ashamed. The fundamental core elements of a racing game such as: cars and tracks doesn’t constitute as “DLC”. If you keep supporting this type of ludicrous behaviour from developers, when does this all end? The developers will just keep on charging and asking for money for EACH and EVERY track, car, or radar etc. As a result customers will be end up paying more money than a full fledged triple A title. Right now as it stands, the amount of content in this release is at best: an unfinished demo. It’s ridiculous and getting way out of hand: games nowadays are so incomplete it’s not even funny: On top of that they are charging for every little addition (cars and tracks) that is fundamental to the racing game? In my opinion it is completely unacceptable. Also it creates problems for the game as a whole, because not everyone will buy the additional content: this will create a “disconnect in the racing lobbies / community” with some users clearly having an advantage over others. As an incentive: the early access adopters who obviously made a commitment to support the game at its earliest stages, shouldn’t have to pay additional money for content that SHOULD BE INCLUDED in a full release. But now it doesn’t seem like there is any real benefit to being an early adopter at all: it just seems more like a blatant scam. Come on please, just take a look at the tiny amount of cars and tracks compared to other racing games? They haven’t even completed the base game yet and already they are thinking about how to milk customers for every track, car that gets a future release. Let’s put things into perspective and use GT7 as a comparison: the amount of content in that game destroys LMU and they even included VR option for free? Plus they have given away many free monthly updates (some updates can contain up to four new cars and a track) and people are still complaining. GT7 is a title in my opinion has the right to charge for DLC because the game itself has enough content and features in its base game. As much as I like this game, LMU may be good and has a lot of potential but it has a long way to go, I mean seriously a long way…. By the way, these guys are not working for free either and this title wouldn’t even be released or exist if their budget didn’t support it. It’s not an excuse: let’s be perfectly honest, this game is none other than a short demo 😡
No problem paying for 2024 season content and beyond, we do this anyway in other sims. Appreciate they're adding some of that content for free too. Excited for online driver swaps, not fussed about the asynchronous stuff, I actually prefer to get stuck into a 24h race against other players with my friends
I don’t even understand why are you asking why need to pay for additional content ??!! This is completely a normal thing ! even more normal when you know the price of the game and the free access to multiplayer… And please stop comparing a real simulation to arcade car games for children like GT7 and Forza…
When iRacers pay almost $30 for a track and car combo, paying that amount for an entire game doesn't feel as bad. Then the iRacers continue to pay monthly subscription charges, and THEN COME BACK TO BUY MORE TRACKS AND CARS when it rotates to the next week... How many people just grabbed both the new Mustang and Corvette GT3's for nearly the same cost as the entire LMU game? All of these sim devs know the player base has no problem spending money if they make a good game, so this shouldn't surprise anyone. If you play/pay iRacing's extortion fees and then complain about this game, you're the problem.... (not you specifically Kireth, but the community as a whole). iRacers will be $500 in the hole to a game they have to keep paying to play and then have the audacity to question another game's DLCs. It's wild. And I say all of that to say, I also don't love DLC's while still in early access. Between the DLC and alluding to a subscription plan, these guys are doing their best to tap into iRacing's model as best they can. From a business perspective, they should. People set money on fire in this hobby all the time. We'll have to see how it works out for them....
I'm not a fan of the ghosting on the starts either but I prefer that a 100% to the rolling starts on iRacing. The ACC start without the ghosting would be perfect if they added it to iRacing. Also props to LMU for giving people the stuff we need without having to install external overlays. It's the thing that frustrates me in iRacing where the hud looks very dated and everybody is using external overlays. You expect the best for what you pay to play iRacing but they could not ad something as simple as a radar...
Complain for paying people work then buy car setups by track paying each one 5 euro on third party websites 😂 If you go on 3rd party website and buy all setups for just one car for the all 7 tracks you already paid more than the price of the game… By the way have you paid for all the patches and updates so far? They also will release some cars for free and people still complain…
While not all roses, it sounds reasonable to me. ACC was in a terrible state at release after early access. New tracks and 7 GT3, 2 of them free is not a bad deal depending on price. At only $30 dollars for base game early access proce, I can't imagine DLC and season pass will cost too much. You will spends tons more than that for any other racing game. My issue is I'd love to suport Studio 397, but really don't trust motorsports games as Lemans Ulitmate is about all they have anymore.
I have no problems with them asking us to pay for more content. They need the revenue stream, this is normal. So long as the asking price is reasonable and they keep making improvements, I'm all in!
I dont mind paying for DLC package content, if pricing is similar to ACC. IRacing is much more costly. Start methods, I think can be revamped to make it less hectic and with better structure, that is likely an easier fix. The radar…. I am not a fan of adding. IMHO I dont think as a “SIM” it’s a good thing, as a “Game”, sure. If you want to be as real as possible and more authentic, dont have the radar, use a spotter. It’s MEANT to feel claustrophobic and tense. It’s all about situational and spatial awareness. SO sure maybe radar at lower license levels to get people started, but in that same vein assists and radar and such don't support skill improvement, if the goal is realism. But, I love LMU and really look forward to the new content!
If this game had launched at a higher price than $30.00 I would probably be upset. If they work the season pass system correctly to make it worth my time, I feel it's alright. I have been very impressed with the game so far, and it most definitely feels more complete than say any NASCAR game in the last 10 years. The handling mistakes are more my lack of skill, rather than fundamental flaws within the game engine. Many of the proposed changes are quality of life. There have definitely been fewer game breaking bugs than with something like WRC 23. Though I have had my share of random CTDs. I love the transparency of their developers and the RUclips videos from the team explaining their roadmap. That communication alone makes me respect what 397 is doing. After the pure calamity that has been Helldivers 2 and the aftermath, I think developers are finally getting fed up with the publishers and taking back (quality) control of their content!
I really want to love this sim but at the moment, I feel quite ambivalent towards it. Maybe I just need to knuckle down and dive into it fully. As for the paid DLC, I don't think it'd be a problem, but that's gonna depend on the costings I think. £25 for what we have already is a bargain I think. ACC & iRacing have paid DLC, so why not LMU. It's far better than Rennsport anyways.
forza motorsport does not do this but it costs 5/6 times more then lmu. also lmu has best car handling and ffb at the moment. They are putting so much effort in the car physics and each car feels great and different. But all of them are engineered great. This is a great update. i have now 195 races online, started from day 1 and cant wait for the dlc. Saison pass is not season pass like other sims. Its a bundle where you get all the content which will be released without to buy each dlc separate and probably will be some better offer if you take all of them. But again: I hope lmu hype will come back because i‘m sure if the game was released as it is now, they would have 10x more player. And on top of that lmu community is amazing. Ps: Why is not ok to ask for more money but is ok to promote academy which is selling setups for money? Lets be real - there is nothing wrong with the last update :)
I am really looking forward GT3 cars. I am not a fan of artificial driving assists and I am just not good enough for hypers or LMP3. I hate giving money to motorsports games but the devs are doing a great job and deserve the success. This is the game to play until ACE is out.
Mixed feelings about DLC this early, to be honest. If this title is to survive, then MG does need to keep generating revenue, so I'm kind of OK with that. The problem with these early access releases is that it all becomes a bit blurry in terms of what exact level of content one actually signed up to buy at the time of purchase. That's the difficult bit, but overall this title is going in the right direction and I'm prepared to turn a blind eye to the DLC aspect and just get it.
I have zero issues paying for tracks or cars. But not when your game crashes constantly, has tons of insane bugs, totally broken AI, the worst load times of any game in the last 4-5 years, etc.
LMU is already the best racing title on the market and is amazing value for money. It costs money to develop and improve games. If you want to play you have to pay.
Le Mans Ultimate is my first "non first party" racing sim, i understand im in the minority here naturally, but the direction they are taking in terms of paying for "DLC" packs while we are still in the same physical year that the game released doesnt make sense to me in any way.This got me very frustrated, but after reading these comments i see there is a side i dont yet understand.
Thirty dollars, it was just for six tracks and for twelve cars, it was expected. I don`t think it is cheap for so little. I think there will be cheaper bundles with the game and the season pass later.
If you have paid for ams2 all the dlc's and that game really came out of beta and they still have a lot of work to do, why criticize an early access that has better gameplay than ams2?
To be competitive the season pass should not be more that 25% of the yearly subscription of iRacing. Did they give the pricing for the DLC? If they did how does it price out vs iRacing's a-la-cart pricing model without the volume discount?
I have no issues paying for quality DLC. Not to mention, they were MORE than generous on the early access content. I remember ACC having 1 car and 1 track, I believe. Sounds like this will have many new features. The radar is a nice edition. Also the new liveries. When you figure to race multiplayer in a simcade like GT7, you have to pay for a PS+ subscription. Online racing in LMU is free. The paid content is not an issue.
Happy to pay, best Multiclass AI I have raced against, they can lap without losing ridiculous time, and the cars just look and feel good to drive, Forza and GT should have mode's that work like this game, and are miles off with no effort to impove in sight.
Simracing is a niche and price is not bad. If you want to play gt7 in multiplayer you have to pay the Sony full price and you have to buy subscription for Ps+ Essential. You can play LMU in multiplayer with no additional cost if you want. If LMU fix all there bugs and give a good VR experience it's OK.
From the current price point the amount of content is acceptable, however, they need to develop it to full release state. The announced content is not directly related to their ea-release, so asking for money is ok from my perspective. The development of such games is a business after all, and they need to make money to continue working on it.
Until they release triple screens natively in the game, without having to use rfactor2 workarounds, I won't play, today it's impossible to play, the menus freeze and are very slow
My question, if you answered it I apologize, is this season pass an annual thing? Or is it like a Top Gear season. meaning several per year. I am hearing it as annually. If annually, I have no problems whatsoever with it. Several times per year..........I will wait and see if the game keeps growing. I just got up and have had one sip of coffee, so please, take it easy on me if this should be obvious. ; )
😂😂 studio397 strikes again “I see they didn’t learn from rfactor 2” This game will be dead before the end of the year. There is going to be no point in throwing money at this with the arrival of ac evo and having reiza and I racing constantly making changes and adding content to their games.
Kireth are you aware that you are in the Gran Turismo movie as one of the pro drivers? I tried to bring this up in your Discord once.
I'm in the Gran Turismo Movie?
@@Kireth Yes, early in the movie when Mardenborough joins a competition against pro Gran Turismo drivers, there's a big screen with all of the drivers' webcams, and you are one of those drivers. Thought you knew this. 🥰🥰
Chat is he right
I don’t see anything controversial. Do you expect them to keep improving the game and the content at $30? I don’t know how much the DLC and season pass will be but at the moment this is a great sim for a very fair price
Would you hire this guy to teach you anything about racing? lol
Pay is ok and this game it diserves, but I hope it won't be early access anymore, otherwise this is kind of scam (they sell products and if any problem "is early access")
I see a lot that is controversial. All the important core features they actually promised, like asynchronous racing, aren't in.
It's just an early access game - yet they're selling DLC's, tracks and there's even a season pass...
But I guess it's fine, gamers have accepted total defeat. 🤣
It is still in early access, it is waaayyy to early for dlc, they should focus on bugs first.
Seems like a very greedy move to me.
I would like to add two more things:
1- I am one of the lucky people for whose the game runs smoothly since day 1, so pay for dlc wouldn't be wrong. But I know very well I am minority and dlc for early access games is not right, not even logic to expand a game before finish it.
2- Motosport games is not a little indy studio who need the support of the community, is a full grown company, so make the game functional for the majority of players before ask for more money should be a must.
Its the lambo lmdh not the alpine lmdh ...
I have no problem to pay for that content. I also want to get paid for my work. What do you want? Everything for free? Do you work for free?
No, but they released it scaled down in EA. Selling dlc when still in EA is not how it should be.
@@sjorsrozendaal218 so would it be okay if they say: "EA is over now! here is the first DLC"? xD
I got no problem paying for extra DLC for updated content, however I don't think they should be able to sell DLC and season passes whilst still hiding behind Early Access.
I completely disagree that it’s “okay to charge for “DLC” that’s supposed to be in the game. Maybe for some other games, “yes it’s ok to charge a bit”, but sorry, not Le Mans Ultimate, they should be ashamed. The fundamental core elements of a racing game such as: cars and tracks doesn’t constitute as “DLC”. If you keep supporting this type of ludicrous behaviour from developers, when does this all end? The developers will just keep on charging and asking for money for EACH and EVERY track, car, or radar etc. As a result customers will be end up paying more money than a full fledged triple A title.
Right now as it stands, the amount of content in this release is at best: an unfinished demo. It’s ridiculous and getting way out of hand: games nowadays are so incomplete it’s not even funny: On top of that they are charging for every little addition (cars and tracks) that is fundamental to the racing game? In my opinion it is completely unacceptable.
Also it creates problems for the game as a whole, because not everyone will buy the additional content: this will create a “disconnect in the racing lobbies / community” with some users clearly having an advantage over others.
As an incentive: the early access adopters who obviously made a commitment to support the game at its earliest stages, shouldn’t have to pay additional money for content that SHOULD BE INCLUDED in a full release. But now it doesn’t seem like there is any real benefit to being an early adopter at all: it just seems more like a blatant scam.
Come on please, just take a look at the tiny amount of cars and tracks compared to other racing games? They haven’t even completed the base game yet and already they are thinking about how to milk customers for every track, car that gets a future release.
Let’s put things into perspective and use GT7 as a comparison: the amount of content in that game destroys LMU and they even included VR option for free? Plus they have given away many free monthly updates (some updates can contain up to four new cars and a track) and people are still complaining. GT7 is a title in my opinion has the right to charge for DLC because the game itself has enough content and features in its base game.
As much as I like this game, LMU may be good and has a lot of potential but it has a long way to go, I mean seriously a long way….
By the way, these guys are not working for free either and this title wouldn’t even be released or exist if their budget didn’t support it. It’s not an excuse: let’s be perfectly honest, this game is none other than a short demo 😡
If it gets PS5/VR support I'll give them whatever they want :)
No problem paying for 2024 season content and beyond, we do this anyway in other sims.
Appreciate they're adding some of that content for free too.
Excited for online driver swaps, not fussed about the asynchronous stuff, I actually prefer to get stuck into a 24h race against other players with my friends
I don’t even understand why are you asking why need to pay for additional content ??!! This is completely a normal thing ! even more normal when you know the price of the game and the free access to multiplayer…
And please stop comparing a real simulation to arcade car games for children like GT7 and Forza…
He is shilling like he always is. Subs and clicks are all that he cares about no matter what he shows or says.
DLC in a early access game...u r joking. Im out. Bye bye.
When iRacers pay almost $30 for a track and car combo, paying that amount for an entire game doesn't feel as bad. Then the iRacers continue to pay monthly subscription charges, and THEN COME BACK TO BUY MORE TRACKS AND CARS when it rotates to the next week... How many people just grabbed both the new Mustang and Corvette GT3's for nearly the same cost as the entire LMU game?
All of these sim devs know the player base has no problem spending money if they make a good game, so this shouldn't surprise anyone. If you play/pay iRacing's extortion fees and then complain about this game, you're the problem.... (not you specifically Kireth, but the community as a whole). iRacers will be $500 in the hole to a game they have to keep paying to play and then have the audacity to question another game's DLCs. It's wild.
And I say all of that to say, I also don't love DLC's while still in early access. Between the DLC and alluding to a subscription plan, these guys are doing their best to tap into iRacing's model as best they can. From a business perspective, they should. People set money on fire in this hobby all the time. We'll have to see how it works out for them....
I'm not a fan of the ghosting on the starts either but I prefer that a 100% to the rolling starts on iRacing. The ACC start without the ghosting would be perfect if they added it to iRacing. Also props to LMU for giving people the stuff we need without having to install external overlays. It's the thing that frustrates me in iRacing where the hud looks very dated and everybody is using external overlays. You expect the best for what you pay to play iRacing but they could not ad something as simple as a radar...
Complain for paying people work then buy car setups by track paying each one 5 euro on third party websites 😂
If you go on 3rd party website and buy all setups for just one car for the all 7 tracks you already paid more than the price of the game…
By the way have you paid for all the patches and updates so far? They also will release some cars for free and people still complain…
While not all roses, it sounds reasonable to me. ACC was in a terrible state at release after early access. New tracks and 7 GT3, 2 of them free is not a bad deal depending on price. At only $30 dollars for base game early access proce, I can't imagine DLC and season pass will cost too much. You will spends tons more than that for any other racing game.
My issue is I'd love to suport Studio 397, but really don't trust motorsports games as Lemans Ulitmate is about all they have anymore.
I have no problems with them asking us to pay for more content. They need the revenue stream, this is normal. So long as the asking price is reasonable and they keep making improvements, I'm all in!
No problems with paid dlc aslong as it doesn’t go full subscription like i racing so us more casual sim players can actually afford to play
I dont mind paying for DLC package content, if pricing is similar to ACC. IRacing is much more costly. Start methods, I think can be revamped to make it less hectic and with better structure, that is likely an easier fix. The radar…. I am not a fan of adding. IMHO I dont think as a “SIM” it’s a good thing, as a “Game”, sure. If you want to be as real as possible and more authentic, dont have the radar, use a spotter. It’s MEANT to feel claustrophobic and tense. It’s all about situational and spatial awareness. SO sure maybe radar at lower license levels to get people started, but in that same vein assists and radar and such don't support skill improvement, if the goal is realism. But, I love LMU and really look forward to the new content!
pro player no radar, now stfu
@@Ducankovic lol, what?
LMU VR forced me to drive without HUD...and i am thankful for that.
If this game had launched at a higher price than $30.00 I would probably be upset. If they work the season pass system correctly to make it worth my time, I feel it's alright. I have been very impressed with the game so far, and it most definitely feels more complete than say any NASCAR game in the last 10 years. The handling mistakes are more my lack of skill, rather than fundamental flaws within the game engine. Many of the proposed changes are quality of life. There have definitely been fewer game breaking bugs than with something like WRC 23. Though I have had my share of random CTDs. I love the transparency of their developers and the RUclips videos from the team explaining their roadmap. That communication alone makes me respect what 397 is doing. After the pure calamity that has been Helldivers 2 and the aftermath, I think developers are finally getting fed up with the publishers and taking back (quality) control of their content!
I really want to love this sim but at the moment, I feel quite ambivalent towards it. Maybe I just need to knuckle down and dive into it fully. As for the paid DLC, I don't think it'd be a problem, but that's gonna depend on the costings I think. £25 for what we have already is a bargain I think. ACC & iRacing have paid DLC, so why not LMU. It's far better than Rennsport anyways.
forza motorsport does not do this but it costs 5/6 times more then lmu. also lmu has best car handling and ffb at the moment. They are putting so much effort in the car physics and each car feels great and different. But all of them are engineered great. This is a great update. i have now 195 races online, started from day 1 and cant wait for the dlc. Saison pass is not season pass like other sims. Its a bundle where you get all the content which will be released without to buy each dlc separate and probably will be some better offer if you take all of them. But again: I hope lmu hype will come back because i‘m sure if the game was released as it is now, they would have 10x more player. And on top of that lmu community is amazing. Ps: Why is not ok to ask for more money but is ok to promote academy which is selling setups for money? Lets be real - there is nothing wrong with the last update :)
I am really looking forward GT3 cars. I am not a fan of artificial driving assists and I am just not good enough for hypers or LMP3.
I hate giving money to motorsports games but the devs are doing a great job and deserve the success. This is the game to play until ACE is out.
Mixed feelings about DLC this early, to be honest. If this title is to survive, then MG does need to keep generating revenue, so I'm kind of OK with that. The problem with these early access releases is that it all becomes a bit blurry in terms of what exact level of content one actually signed up to buy at the time of purchase. That's the difficult bit, but overall this title is going in the right direction and I'm prepared to turn a blind eye to the DLC aspect and just get it.
I have zero issues paying for tracks or cars. But not when your game crashes constantly, has tons of insane bugs, totally broken AI, the worst load times of any game in the last 4-5 years, etc.
LMU is already the best racing title on the market and is amazing value for money. It costs money to develop and improve games. If you want to play you have to pay.
Le Mans Ultimate is my first "non first party" racing sim, i understand im in the minority here naturally, but the direction they are taking in terms of paying for "DLC" packs while we are still in the same physical year that the game released doesnt make sense to me in any way.This got me very frustrated, but after reading these comments i see there is a side i dont yet understand.
Thirty dollars, it was just for six tracks and for twelve cars, it was expected. I don`t think it is cheap for so little.
I think there will be cheaper bundles with the game and the season pass later.
If you have paid for ams2 all the dlc's and that game really came out of beta and they still have a lot of work to do, why criticize an early access that has better gameplay than ams2?
Love LMU CONTENT!!!
Happy to pay as long as it’s good content tracks and cars. After all the are not a charity.great vid👍
This game is just on a different level in VR...it's quickly becoming my go to racing game
Without VR it's a big no thanks
Still no word about TrackIR support. Pfff...
Maybe its just me but I'm not really bothered by this.
Radar? Get your game up people. Triples or nothing.
i love this game
i will pay for the upate but they need to finish the game first
I am thinking of buying your gt7 guide but I am kinda confused, like do you only get acces to a few videos? Or is there more to it
Hello! There's 8 bespoke videos and written instructions/challenges with each of them
@@Kireth thanks for the info!
Really hope you enjoy it if you decide to purchase, let me know!
@@Kireth I don’t use pay pal so I can’t buy rn but my dad uses it but he is out of town for a few days
@@Kireth never mind I managed to buy it, I am very exited to try it out
It's beta dude, games not out yet. Chill
To be competitive the season pass should not be more that 25% of the yearly subscription of iRacing. Did they give the pricing for the DLC? If they did how does it price out vs iRacing's a-la-cart pricing model without the volume discount?
Keep an eye on your inbox Gary!!
@@Kireth Roger that boss!
What's the word on VR in LMU?
no eta yet, they claim they wanna do it justice and not just port over what the engine is generally able to do
I have no issues paying for quality DLC. Not to mention, they were MORE than generous on the early access content. I remember ACC having 1 car and 1 track, I believe.
Sounds like this will have many new features. The radar is a nice edition. Also the new liveries.
When you figure to race multiplayer in a simcade like GT7, you have to pay for a PS+ subscription. Online racing in LMU is free. The paid content is not an issue.
Happy to pay, best Multiclass AI I have raced against, they can lap without losing ridiculous time, and the cars just look and feel good to drive, Forza and GT should have mode's that work like this game, and are miles off with no effort to impove in sight.
Comparing Forza and GT7 to this is apples to Tomatoes 😂😂
lol, fake drama here we go again......
Simracing is a niche and price is not bad. If you want to play gt7 in multiplayer you have to pay the Sony full price and you have to buy subscription for Ps+ Essential. You can play LMU in multiplayer with no additional cost if you want. If LMU fix all there bugs and give a good VR experience it's OK.
i'm happy to pay AFTER early access ends, not before. i want the full game first then the extras.
HOPE THEY OPTIMIZE THE SHT OUT OF IT
From the current price point the amount of content is acceptable, however, they need to develop it to full release state. The announced content is not directly related to their ea-release, so asking for money is ok from my perspective. The development of such games is a business after all, and they need to make money to continue working on it.
Im waiting for vr.
I say bring it on!!
Anybodys race start out fine then it starts to stutter and its like it cuts the wheel for a split second as the race progresses ?
So when’s it coming to console??
Its graphic engine aint supported on console….buy a pc
Game looks good but no VR, they get none of my money..
Will the new cars be in early access or finished? If they are finished then ok to pay. if they are alpha then no.
Until they release triple screens natively in the game, without having to use rfactor2 workarounds, I won't play, today it's impossible to play, the menus freeze and are very slow
My question, if you answered it I apologize, is this season pass an annual thing? Or is it like a Top Gear season. meaning several per year. I am hearing it as annually. If annually, I have no problems whatsoever with it. Several times per year..........I will wait and see if the game keeps growing.
I just got up and have had one sip of coffee, so please, take it easy on me if this should be obvious. ; )
😂😂 studio397 strikes again “I see they didn’t learn from rfactor 2” This game will be dead before the end of the year. There is going to be no point in throwing money at this with the arrival of ac evo and having reiza and I racing constantly making changes and adding content to their games.
Comparing LMU to AMS2 online play....HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Full fail.