Tutorial: Shutter Speed for Filmmakers / PART I
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 июл 2017
- This is Part 1 of a 3 Part Tutorial in the Filmmakers Compendium.
PART 1: The Basics
All you need to kow about Shutter Speed: Why is shutter needed for smooth motion, what is motion resolution and how does „motion blur“ effect the perception of movement.
PART I • Tutorial: Shutter Spee...
PART II • Tutorial: Shutter Spee...
PART III • Tutorial: Shutter Spee... 
Кино
Media Division is undoubtedly the best You Tube channel for learning film craft.You are like a university for post - graduate studies whereas other channels are like high school.I don't mean to say that other You Tube channels don't give relevent and useful content and that they are not hard working.But what comes from Media Division is so much above others that one has to experience it to believe it.I find you guys presenting the most technical stuff in the most engaging and lucid manner.You are certainly a University of Technical aspects of film- making on You Tube.
Thanks Ajay… very hay that you appreciate. Yeah, we aim higher than most others … and that is whats keeping us small ;-(
Finding your channel provoked what I think would be a feeling similar to accidentally unearthing buried treasure. You are a great teacher and I will learn a great deal here. THANK YOU.
Glad you think so Albert… it's nice to be appreciated
Hands down, you guys create some of the best tutorials across all of RUclips. Your work is exceptional, bottom line.
Thanks a lot Carlos… glad you feel that way. I find our older episodes lacking the depth and effort that we provide with the newer ones
There is no better tutorial/training/explanatory series about filmmaking (and general photography principles) on the Net. The fact that these videos are openly available to the public is so beneficial to the broadening of knowledge in this field that they should have a revolutionary effect in improving both Indie and established filmmaking. I say this as a former university-level technical photography instructor and 40-year professional photographer and videographer. Thank you Media Division!
Thats very kind of you John... thanks you VERY much. I feel like these early videos really match our standards now... but hey, one needs to look back at ones own history. Very glad you feel that they are still worthy.
This is the best tutorial I ever heard about this topic. Thank you!
Thanks a lot Florian!! thanks for watching!
They always are.
May you be bestowed with all the happiness in the world, you are doing a noble deed at such a high quality, kudos to you man
Thank you. Please keep making video. In future some of your regular viewer will reach great height in entertainment industry and you will be appreciated in future.
Thank you... I hope you are right... or something more beneficial for us directly
Your content is the best out of all film making stuff on youtube. To me you are perfectionist. Thank you.
Thanks a lot Sachin..... that is very nice of you to say and very motivating! Thank you for being around.
Watching this with a background in photography really changes the perspective of shutter speed.
Btw your channel is so next level! I really wish all your efforts would pay off in one way or another because the quality of your videos, if we can really call them like that - more like movies, is insane
Thanks Jure... yeah, that make two of us... and they will need to
@@MediaDivision Patreon!
I would support you directly.
Simply great. Clear and concise
Thanks man!!!! Glad it works for you.... for me, this seems ages old
I wish I found this channel sooner.....I Love it!!!!
Thanks man… better late then never 😅
0 dislike. you earned it man. really great way of learning. thank you
pssst don't tell anybody… otherwise I get a ton of dislikes 😂😂 Thanks man!!!
You are, by far, the best channel on all subjects cinema. I hope you make a million (or more) dollars.
We are working on our 5th million… after the first 4 million didn't work out 😂😂😂 I wish we will get somewhere there. Thanks a lot for the motivation Gabby!
That is the best explanation of NTSC interlaced video I've ever heard, basically Increased motion resolution through interlacing with a decrease in frame resolution (field vs frame) short and sweet. Archive doc producers are still dealing with :)
Thanks man... not only NTSC... all interlaced formats (PAL, 1080i...). Yeah... I am really happy that these formats going away... they are a real hassle in post and in a world of diverse native resolutions.
Your channel is really the best!
Ernst Morozov thanks Ernst
Just like everyone else, your video is one of the absolute best I have seen on RUclips, please keep producing them, they are so extremely helpful! Really appreciate how much context and examples you give around the technical details, which makes understanding and remembering a lot easier, keep up the great work mate.
Thanks a lot Michael... thats very motivating for me! Thanks for hanging around.
I am new here and this is the best channel with the highest quality that I have seen on youtube! well done.
Thank you Lucas… appreciated. Now, I wish YOuTube would see that the same way 😁 Spread the word… but not with this old ass video
A lot of information shared within 10 mins,, I got so much clarity on the topic as it was explained so well .Thank you 🙏🏻
My Pleasure Ira… glad it was helpful for you
Your channel makes me got hope for online education .
Thanks a lot
Thanks man.... the newer episodes are much better tough 😉
Smartest guy in Hollywood
… well, thanks a lot. Wish I was in Hollywood… before the Donald.
Just found your channel and it's amazing man, keep it up! I would love to see more useful tutorials for filmmaking :)
Thanks Midnight... we are on it. We shifted toward "infotainment" instead of simple tutorials, but those usually include tutorials. Glad to have you around
This is so good it should have more views. Thank you for sharing your knowledge. Merci.
Thanks man... well spread the word ;-)
I really appreciate the fact that you manage to get Jürgen Klopp to voice over your great videos.
I am always amazed how RUclips is a lesson in human perception and pareidolia.
I sound as much as Jürgen Klopp as I sound like Morgan Freeman as they sound alike. I look as much as Hugh Laurie as I look like Christoper Lee or the 50 others I am supposed to have an "uncanny" similarities with that look nothing alike.
This channel is so helpful and informative!!! This man needs more subscribers...
Thanks man... glad you like it. Couldn't agree more ☺
Perfect videos on your channel. Deserves much more subscribers
Thanks again Samir!
Amazing eye brow work!
Eye brow?!?!
Great tutorial sir
Thanks
thank you so much for taking the time to explain all of this
my pleasure Abraham... thanks for watching
Perfect lesson! Thank you!
Thanks a lot!
Thank you very much Nikki
I really liked your explanation of this interesting topic.
Btw, Reidly Scott also uses fast shutter speed at fight and action scenes , as well as slow shutter speed at dreamy scenes.
My pleasure Muhammad… sure…. many many do.
This is gold! Thank you for this!
Thanks Louise
zero dislikes. now that, you don't see often. well done!
Don't tell anybody.... or it will change quicker then you can say "like"
Was struggling to understand how shutter speed relates to the frame rate when filming motion...you helped me tremendously with this video...going to watch part 2 & 3 asap! Many thanks! Liked and subscribed for sure!
Glad this helped.... it is very old and very basic. Our newer videos are definiely desigened for a much deeper understanding of things.
Extremely useful. Thank you so much.
Glad it was helpful!
Brilliant description! !
Thanks ... glad you like it!
:) I'm glad too see your one the best tutorial. I feel a lot better about the direction and the consultant guided me in the right path on how I should approach from photography to videography in the future.
sound like you are on your way!!!
Oh, and the framerate of film (24fps) was mainly chosen because it was the minimal speed to get acceptable speech out of sound systems that was printed on the projection print. Before sound on film, the acceptable fps was anywhere between 12 to 20 fps... And in very early on it often fluctuated because the projector and cameras were both hand cranked and the operators couldn't keep the speed steady because of muscle fatigue...
yes.... I know
Good to know. Interesting too
another factor is that they chose the minimal frame rate that would still create smooth motion so they saved film roll
I think it was mainly chosen as a compromise between cost and realism. 24fps is extremely slow by some modern standards, I’d rather see 240 fps, no motion blur and no chop.
hi Nik how are you you are great bro your lessons are very important for me thank you so much
It is my pleasure Amman! Thanks for the motivation
This channel is awesome! Just subscribed!
Thanks Jimmy! Glad to have you!
I really like your examples.
Thank you!!!
This was helpful thank you
Glad you like it!!
big fan from 🇳🇵 Nepal
That is great man ... super nice to have such an international audience. Glad to have you around
That was great thanks!
Thanks for whatching
I'm glad you mentioned Dragon Slayer. I love that movie and the effects. I didn't know about Go Motion. I think people should you it more often because it makes thinks so much realistic than some CGI effects.
I wish there would be a revival of go motion.... it is just so complex and CGI is getting cheaper and more realistic by the hour. I don't think it is going to happen.
@@MediaDivision Definitely! Star Wars would be a good starting point for a go notion revival. They have the money for that :D
Thank you, good info.
My pleasure Hiker!
672 likes and 0 dislikes, highest number of likes with 0 dislike I've ever seen. Great!
pssssst ..... don't tell anyone.... otherwise it will change immediately 😅
Greate video, thank you!
Pleasure Ialo... rather watch our new videos!
Very Helpful Video
Thank you Abhinav… glad you like it.
Very helpful. Bob
Thanks Bob!
Omg you amazing man
Thanks a lot Knight King!!!
Thank you so much
Absolutely my pleasure man
very very very good channel
Thanks man… glad to have you around
Great work man, like to dislike ratio says everything about your content.
psst .... don't tell anyone, or they'll dislike it ;-) thanks again Spiderman
Nice!
Thanks!
Danke sehr, ziemlich gut!
Cheers
Danke………… uuuuuuuuralt… guck lieber unsere neuen
Dude, that Terminator stop-motion scene made it even more creepy, and I love it for that.
Keep up the good work.
Oh... absolutely.... I love the factory scene. I would purposely include strobing in modern CGI to get that creep factor. it is just a good example where realism breaks a bit.
great channel ! one recommendation would be to incorporate text and graphics to your videos for reinforcement of the subject by reading.
thanks for your input Alejandro. This is an old video and our new one have much improved production quality.... although we still strongly believe to only use text is necessary and as little as possible. It's all about transporting context through images
Awesome stuff
...and thank you again!! ;-)
@@MediaDivision
Super
Thanks Lazar
classic 2d animation used "smears" and "squash and stretch" techniques to somewhat replicate motion blur. See samples of it on google. Coraline(and all films by studio Laika) implemented this techniques with their 3d models which is why their animation appears way smoother than traditional stop motion.
In photography, shutter speed or shutter speed corresponds to the inverse of the exposure time and refers to the period during which the shutter of a camera is open.
It is expressed in seconds and fractions.
.......so? do we say anything going against that? This is for shutter in film
@@MediaDivision Yeah, I know, but I'm just talking about it if it's an photo.
great
Thank you Ahmed
good job on the intro
On this one?!?!? Watch one of our newer ones
I wish you could make an Tutorial about lenses. What lens in which Szene. There are a lot of possibilities but which is easy and good enough?! Hope you do it as soon as possible. I wanna make my first short film but I need still a bit of classes. But anyway thank for you all your clips. 👍🏽
I feel like that is a bit too basic to make an episode about, don't you.
I think, that every scene demands a little insight about what you want to do... how it is supposed to feel... so on. The focal length follows. I often shoot just with 50mm and get away just fine with it... remember that the human eye is only one focal length, too.
Here is something very cool that Deakins shows... ruclips.net/video/hoLVqtU7QeA/видео.html
I would try this approach... put yourself into the viewers place. Is this a scene where he would look around, explore the setting? Choose something wide. You want him to look closer and harder. Chose something long. You don't want to draw attention to the viewpoint at all. Choose a normal lens. If you din't want to expressively use focal length for effect, choose the most natural focal length for any given view point.
Now... you can totally play with focal length to invoke an emotion, or to hide something.
"Blade Runner" used long lenses for the street scenes to hide the small size of the set... causing disorientation and a feeling of claustrophobia. "It follows" used wide lenses for deep DoF and wide FoV and to create a nervous tension in the viewer, because he permanently has to "scan" the whole scene.
Be creative.... try alternatives... test. Think every scene through before you shoot it. Watch movies that you like (and that have a comparable mood), and see what they have done.... ask yourself... why?! Just follow the steps of the DoP & Director... you will get it.
Hope that helps
Thanks for the informative video. My older Pana SD900 video cam, has 25 interlace or 50 progressive settings which I prefer to shoot in. So as not to require extra lighting when shooting 50p I would rather set frame shutter speed/angle to 50/(360). As I am only filming interviews indoors with controlled lighting with little or no movement from the subject. Any suggestions would be really appreciated. Can't find this info anywhere. Tony
It is a bit odd that your cam doesn't support 25p when it does offer 50p. 25i will generate 50 half-picutes and no progressive images. Conversion to 25p will produce artefacts. If you can set shutter speed to 1/50 manually, it should result in a 50p signal with double frames... if you drop those on a 25p timeline you should be good. That is very wasteful in terms of bandwidth.
im glad i found this so early in my film journey. remember the name folks, I'll be big someday
You don't lack confidence Tosan... don't let that govern your art. You have to be your greatest critic to improve. Most great filmmakers are extremely critical with themselves.
@@MediaDivision Thank you!
honestly who the fuck are these 6 people that disliked the video? are you guys oscar winning cinematographers already???
What....actual theory, logic and practical advice....who know?
cheers Cedd!!!!!!
And if i shoot and upload 50/60 fps (not for slo-motion), shutter must be 100/120, right?
By the 180° rule yes... but I have seen many use 1/50 to preserve a bit more of a classic film look and to have the option to just display any other frame after shooting. The best is to try it for yourself and to find out what you want!
The problem is all phones takes only 30fps. And you'll get flickering lights in EU/Asia.
Is there a good free Motion Blur Filter out there?
not so... get the www.filmicpro.com/ app and you gain control....
Maybe resolve has a feature like that... find out
What mic do you use?
For the voice overs we use a Rhode NT USB
Hi one more question please. I have in the past shot in 25i and rendered it out at 25p in editing programme. Is this ok? Thanks Tony
It is a bit odd that your cam doesn't support 25p when it does offer 50p. 25i will generate 50 half-picutes and no progressive images. Conversion to 25p will produce artefacts. If you can set shutter speed to 1/50 manually, ir should result in a 50p signal with double frames... if you drop those on a 25p timeline you should be good. That is very wasteful in terms of bandwidth.
@@MediaDivision Thanks so much, camera is Panasonic sd900 3ccd of which I have 2 to shoot interviews. The 25 is definitely interlace I have checked sample with media info. Based on your help I think 'shoot manual 50p 180 shutter' (28mbs.) Would it make more sense to drop on 50p timeline and export as 50p? Would be viewed on devices and tv's, do you think that would cause any issues? Thanks Tony
If it doesn’t double frames it look quite different to use 50 FPS over 25fps. HDTVs can display both without problems. I would use 25fps timeline because of the narrative look. It is a bit hard to believe that you are creating HD content for TV using these cameras.
@@MediaDivision Hi one last thing. After testing on Samsung tv found it did not like 50p output - So will capture 50p 100 shutter (add light if required on interviewee) and export at 25p Thanks
Just do 50p at 360 shutter and export at 25p… that will give you 180 shutter for each frame. BTW 360 shutter is impossible as there needs to be time for the sensor to flush… but most manual cams offer it anyways (loosing a couple of milli seconds)
lol I didn't see the spill of bluescreen on terminator
What camera is this and the settings??
Thanks
GH5 / Vlog L and I don't like it any more at all... old video
Thanks
Also... Fun note... The Muybridge idea of using multiple still cameras to capture fast motion is essentially the same as the Bullet Cam rigs that were all the rage after The Matrix.
...
I'll see myself out...
thats right... in a very simple way
I still wonder why camera manufacturers don't include a auto-exposure auto lock during recording. You pick up the camera, it autoexposes and then, no matter what happens in front of the lens, the exposure settings aren't changed during recording. This would help immensely for newcomers... Or for pros who need to just pull out the camera to grab a quick shot.
The camera gets things into the rough ballpark and then the exposure stays fixed unti thel next recording .
Couple that with a push to autoexpose button (like the push to autofocus button some cameras have) and you can quickly adjust things mid recording if need be.
Of course I too advocate that all people who want to learn photography should learn full manual modes. And most of the times it's far superior. But sometimes it can be "good enough" to just let the camera adjust things while you as a photographer gets the subject in frame to get the shot. And it would greatly improve shots that normal people record without knowing the intricacies of shutter, iris and light metering as it would eliminate the constant exposure fluctuation when they move past windows and such.
Thats exactly how cameras like EVA1 and FS7 work. Consumer cams are just what they are... built for consumers and their needs. There is always manual mode.
@@MediaDivision I'm going to save for EVA1, ef mount ready is a bonus as I already own canon lenses.
@@tenslider6722 I hope you will have fun with EVA... more cool things are coming to her in the future.
Was ist die richtige Bildrate und Verschlusszeit für Slowmotion
Videos?
Regel ist: (Die Faustregel für die Belichtungszeit lautet: Doppelte Framerate. Bei 25 p, sollte man also mit 1/50 Sekunde belichten, bei 50fps mit 1/100 Sekunde). Das bedeutet für eine Slowmotion Mit 4 Fächer langsamer bei 25P aufnahmeinstelung und 100 Bildfrequenz soll Belichtungszeit 1/200 Sekunden sein.
Meine frag ist warum bei Sony S&Q Mode. Wenn ich 25P und 100 FPS einstellen warum Belichtungszeit wird automatich auf 1/100 Sekunde statt 1/200 Sekunde.
Viele Lieben dank für ihre Aufmerksamkeit und Antworten.
What is the right frame rate and shutter speed for slow motion
videos?
The rule is: (The rule of thumb for the exposure time is: double the frame rate. At 25 p, you should expose with 1/50 second, with 50 fps with 1/100 second). That means for a slow motion with 4 compartments slower at 25P and 100 frame rate exposure time should be 1/200 seconds.
My question is why with Sony S&Q Mode. When I set 25P and 100 FPS why exposure time is automatically set to 1/100 second instead of 1/200 second.
Many thanks for your attention and answers.
I can’t tell you why Sony does anything… I don’t have one.
How digital and common camera is total different. Today a real computer and software but equal entire Hollywood. Because image data of famous celebrities are available for infinity. But real computer is hard to find without windows hacking. Therefore future is just lense and electricity is enough
Again... words.... no coherent meaning
What difference between pal in Europe video than asian and america video
PAL= higher spatial resolution at 50hz NTSC = higher temporal resolution at 60hz
You can google this
I miss my wife
Sorry for that!