The Boeing 777x vs Airbus A350 - Which Plane Is Best?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 май 2024
- Dealing with setback after setback, Boeing has been hard at work getting the 777X ready to enter service. But the giant aircraft with its iconic folding wingtips will have to outpace its nearest competitor, the Airbus A350, if it is to gain market share. So which one is better? Let's take a look.
Article link: simpleflying.com/777x-vs-a350/
Our Social Media:
/ simpleflyin. .
/ simple_flying
/ simpleflying. .
Our Website
simpleflying.com/
For copyright matters please contact us at: legal@valnetinc.com 
Развлечения
As much as I love the 777X, I have to admit the A350 is an absolute marvel of engineering
Honestly, I just cannot understand what is plaguing Boeing with their 777X? Even the FAA have doubts on some aspects of its development? Hopefully Boeing can sort it out very soon. Yes, the A350 rules the skies for now. Absolute marvel of an aircraft
When you try the 777X-8 with the cabin altitude as a private jet and much further range, I think you'd change your mind
@@abdelkadermehiz9407 what bullshit to read!!!
The A350 is a proven reality while the 777x still has to deliver its promise
So true, but before that it needs to promise to deliver!
The A350 is a Dreamliner knockoff! And, actually not as good or as fuel efficient.
@@sainnt the A350 does not even compete against 787, Stop comparing them.
@@sainnt and the fact that you say is a “Dreamliner knockoff” they are different.
@@kathy8770 They're similar in terms of the way they were built. They're the only two mainly composite aircraft, and the Dreamliner was first.
I flew the A350-1000 Business Class on the Qatar QSuite from Dallas to Doha, Qatar then onto Chennai, India... Compared to many other planes, the A350-1000 made of composites was supremely quieter and I loved the huge windows... Looking forward to the 777X in a couple of years....! it looks like a winner by economical calculations & passenger comfort as well as sheer looks alone...
I think that we’re all wining by having Airbus and Boeing fighting for the better plan.
Great sharing
Did you ever fly a Dreamliner?
@@radiohead2206 Yes but it was the Boeing 787-9...A beautiful plane, but I wasn't impressed with it as much as the Airbus A-350-1000 which was incredibly quiet and my flight from Doha, Qatar to DFW was luxurious. I am definitely excited to see and fly on the new 777X coming out next year...
I'm actually amazed how a350 is compared to both b777 and b787, and still is able to keep up or even outclass both on some areas
b787 is a330neo competitor also?
@@ezrasianturi6159 yes but the 787 is way beyond its league and is outselling it. The a330 neo cannot keep up with the 787
The 787 doesn't compete directly with a350 because it's a bit smaller and the a350 -1000 competes more with the 777X-8. The -9 is longer and a bit larger , suited for previous 777 300 and 747 operators
@@mmm0404 They do overlap by a bit. 78J and 359 are quite similar, with 78J having slightly lower seat cost and higher capacity, while 359 flies further.
Between a 789 and 359 they have similar payload range capability, with 359 bigger and flies further, while 789 smaller and cheaper.
A330NEO can't match 787 in all metrics, but doesn't have to. Within 4000nm its fuel burn trails by ~2%, which is actually impressive for a low cost development of just $2B, with only the engine and winglet are significantly changed. They have ~2/3 of 787 orders since launch, and in a few sales battle 787 has to match price to win, despite being a more modern and capable frame.
In comparison, Boeing carrierd much more extensive changes and spent at least $6B on 777X, still cannot compete head to head with A350.
@@steinwaldmadchen
The B789 is a smaller than the a350 and has less range but not by much.
In terms of sitting capacity the 787-10 does match the -900 , but lags terribly with range .
The 777X competes more with the 350-1000 , and that's for the Smaller -8X... , The -9 is larger . I don't think the 777X was ment really to complete with the a350 but mostly as a replacement for current 777 operators and previous 747 operators.... It's a better replacement for for Emirates a380 than the 350 . That's why Emirates has not ordered the -1000 ....
Having flown the A350 on several different airlines (sihngapore, Thai and BA to name 3) I do love it. What would give me most cause for concern with the new 777 is that it is brough to us by the company that fudges issues to get certification on other developments of existing airframes and build quality issue. I think I would want to see it working for a fair while beforew I sit on it, mind you I said the same about flying twin jets across the Altantic many years ag
Honestly, thank you for just starting the vid without any stupid bumpers or anything like that that wastes 5-10s of vid time. Really appreciate it.
I’m sure both are fabulously capable aircraft, but when push comes to shove, would I trust a new Boeing? - no. Airbus every time
The A350 as its actually flying...
#airbusforever
This is why this video makes no sense. Until the 777X dont start flying, it cant be compared to the A350. Im belive, the 777 X will be better. Boeing need a win after the MAX
I love flying on the A350 and its unparalleled comfort but I'm really looking foward to trying the 777X.
Hopefully get it by the end of 2025 haha
Agreed!
if you really like 10-across seatings in 777x
@Beef Supreme I have a family of 3 so a 3-4-3 config would be perfect for me. I make a point of paying extra to pick my seats.
Qatar A350 Q-suite is probably the best flight experience I’ve ever had. So sad that Airbus and Qatar are on bad terms because it’s a great product
The 777x will certainly be better with its wider cabin, Qatar airways will be able to configure their planes better and have more comfortable seats! The two planes are superb but I must say that I prefer the 777x which will undoubtedly be better for the passengers and the pilots but as far as airlines are concerned, the A350 meets more needs and is a little more economical!
The Qsuite is also in the triple seven which is the same exact thing, so I don’t know what you’re talking about
@@themanman165 I know but the A350 and the 777 is not the same airplane so the experience is still different :)
@@tigerchuu2148 but its not it's literally the same thing! My girlfriend works for Qatar Airways as a flight attendant so I’ve been on both aircraft multiple times
@@themanman165 The product is the same I know i've flown the qsuit on both airplaines but even though the product are the same the airplanes are not so the experience is different.
I couldn't believe the listed price difference between the two planes when I looked it up. The A350 likely provides better fuel efficiency than the 777 all while coming in at $100 million less. Surely the only reason an airline would consider purchasing the 777 over the A350 is for larger capacity
A350 because its versatile and airbus can further extend on market demand as Ultrafan engines gets ready, and airbus will be in a position to launch a350 neo with further lower fuel burn hence making 777x more vulnerable. Already 777x wont be ready as early as 2025. Boeing will face the same issues like MAXX vs NEO in next 7-8 years.
And then Boeing can replace the 747/777 families with one brand new aircraft family and take the "A350NEO" head on.
@@mh12-47 won't that take years and years to come to fruition?
@@mh12-47 won't that take years and years to come to fruition?
The A350 is not well suited to carry cargo, and that part was missing in this video. Airlines are going to want the 777 because it's going to carry more passengers and cargo, and do it significantly cheaper than the A380. The 777-9 is not built to compete with the A350-1000. It's basically going to be in a class all by itself.
@@sainnt FINALLY SOMEONE UNDERSTANDS!!! I've been saying this since 2013. The A350-1000 competes with the 77W. The 777-9X are class by in itself. The last 10yrs years the fanboys have been comparing the 777X with A35K which never made sense. The 777X was designed to be the true sucessor to the 747-400 and at a stretch the A380.
I was rooting for the 777 but the A350 edges it out...the wingtip bend on the A350 is so cool.
777x will have its work cut out to compete with A350.
I already flew 2 times with the A350 and the Boeing 787-9 in the past 3 years. I must say that in terms of noise the Dreamliner is a little bit more quiet. But compared to A320/A330 and Boeing 777-200/300ER it feels like half the noise. Love them both.
787 is just slightly better than the noisy 777-300ER
The a350 is quiter than 787
@kwwong2893 having flown on both, it's way better than the 300er.
As a European it would be helpful if you add metric scales as well…
As an American i am dissapointed that the unit 'football fields'was never used.
Yes, definitely agree with you! These conversions...
Both are designed for very different needs. Airline CEO's will carfully decide which aircraft suite their needs and order accordingly.
#airbusforever
Exactly. They are both great aircraft, even with the problems, that fill a different need.
long haul. similar capacities
That's not true. These planes are incredibly similar..the 777 has a 30 year impeccable history with thousands of trained techs all over the world.that's the major advantage with Boeing
@@iLoveBoysandBerries But 777X is still significantly bigger with no real advantage on seat cost. Some airlines like JAL and Cathay has started replacing 777 1-to-1 with similar sized 350, or downsizing 77W to 359 instead.
Seems like only those who can fill an A380 are taking 777X, and even if they do, often they don't order as many as they did for 77W.
From the numbers being shown (0.09 vs 0.11 lb/seat/nautical mile), the A350 offers 18% lower fuel consumption on a per passenger basis. This is a big advantage for Airbus; at least a generational gap.
This is why A350 is superior
Too early to draw conclusions about fuel efficiency since 777x hasn't even entered service yet.
What I liked most about the Airbus A350 XWB is in fact the tail and fuselage cameras, which is perfect for me to use during takeoff, landing, and even if my window shade is closed.
07:50 Surprising to see how much heavier the 777x is in comparison to its competitors.
29% heavier than A350-1000
That's because it's not a composite heavy aircraft like the A350 or Dreamliner. It's built using more metal. However it's lighter than the current 777, has composite wings and a much more modern engine. All adds up to 15% better fuel efficiency, and no competition in its class.
@@sainnt But is it not also competing against the a350?
@@blackhole4106 The 777-9 is in a class all by itself. The A350 cannot match it. The A350 competes with the current 777.
@@sainnt I don't know much beyond the specs, but I just know that the 777-9 has similar seating capacity and range as the a350-900. How else do they differ?
One plane is actual certified
#airbusforever
A bird in the hand.....
@@heidirabenau511 lol
A350-1000 😎👌
#airbusforever
The A350 is such a comfortable plane. The width, wall shape and cabin pressure really makes a difference. The curved wings and cockpit windows are so good looking. The 777x looks very good too. If SQ keeps 333 on the 777x it will be very comfortable.
Both are great planes, although i wish Boeing did better and pay more attention to 777X development. SQ probably will do 3-3-3 on 777-9, but I am not that optimistic after they put the 3-3-3 on the 787
777 is wider
They will definitely not go 3-3-3 on the 777X because due to a wider cabin the Economy seats on the 777X with 3-4-3 will be just as wide as on the A350 with 3-3-3.
You got this one right. All the numbers favor the A350 1000. The fact the A350 has better seat/mile economics that the larger 777x speaks volumes. Boeings money plane is the 787 in that it has similar technology to A350 & performance figures are very similar, particularly with GENX engines, by all accounts
I agree, I wonder why they couldn't make an even larger version of the 787 to replace all the 777s while the 787-10 already replaces the smaller 777s. But hands down, Airbus would be my pick.
Doesn’t sound like the new 777 offers that much more than the A350-1000
They really pushed the old airframe to thenlimit to give 777x an chance to compeate with A350... and it might, but im sceptical.
What is really intesting is next gen blank Sheet airline where all tve tech from both 777x and 787 are combined.
@@matsv201 yea we don’t need the 777 to be the next 737,meaning older airframes keep around forever
@@russellstrom8234 while 777 isnt "that" old.. now when we going over to composite, its like when we went from wood to metal, sudenly all airframes are outdated.
@@matsv201 When will it be released in 2100? Boeing says the 777x is due late 25 at least and the 787 hasn't had one delivered in over 14 months. Every military plane the Redhawk trainer still not ready Ospreys kill 51 so far, KC46 Pegasus still not fully deployed and years late all due to QC issues.
@@eleventy-seven boeing and airbus will keep at least one plane under development at any time. Now all boeings staf is bussy fixing thr 777x after they just fixed the 737max. But they will be on the next projecr the minute its in peoduction.
For airbus they finish up the 321XLR and the A350F, then its onto the next priject. I guess the A220-700., then after that probobly a new clean sheet.
The point is. They are always develop8ng somethung.
The 777X has a lot of ground to make up when it finally makes it into service. As was the A380 the Achilles for Airbus, could the 777X be Boeing's???
The 747 had decades to make her mark and stamp herself as the Queen of the skies. While unfortunately the A380 will have far less time, despite being far superior in a lot of ways.
Yes, the A350 will have only had a decade up it's sleeve by the time the 777X is supposedly going to be in service, but given the way technology moves, how the travel industry operates and several other factors... that 10 years advantage, may as well be 30 years. Meaning there's a lot of catching up to do!
I look forward to flying with either when the time comes though, as I find long haul gruelling unfortunately, so anything that makes the flight more comfortable and quicker, whilst also being more efficient and environmentally friendly, to a point, is a good thing.
I'd be cool to see an updated version of this comparison once the 777x actually starts being in service!
Best put the kettle on, it may be quite a wait 😊
B777x order book been opened since 2013 with 341 orders.. whilst the first 9 years of A350 had 777 orders, that's more than double.
The A350-900 is a whole different category than the 777X. Even the A350-1000 is smaller than the 777-9. Compare orders for the A350-1000 and 777-9 and you will be surprised ...
Well if Boeing doesn’t give emirates their fair share, numbers will drop to 300 orders. Meanwhile airbus is constantly working to fulfill hundreds of orders that are not likely to be dropped.
I would look for comfort while I fly. 777x beats A350 in this regard
The take off in 777 is worth every penny, those engines kick you in the butt
2:41 what a livery😍
Both of the giants are quite good machines, however the time will show us which aircraft is better, it's a matter of time.
Hoping that tge a350 would also get more stretvh in order to compete with the 777x specialty for ME airliness
A350 >>
#airbusforever
what is the website at 3:02?
The Boeing 777-9 is a very promising jet and will be an important jet, wait a minute...will it enter service at the first place?probably
350 any day !
By far the best looking plane EVER, btw !
Man, I really hope Boeing are able to deliver on the 777x. Boeing really needs a win after the 737Max.
2022 has been full of losses for Boeing lol
Rough times for them
@@breadbot999 Airbus FAILED in Qatar . Boeing is rising
@@breadbot999 When the corporate world overrules science, shit happens.
@@breadbot999 who told u,, just check the data…they got enough order of 737 max..n there are more than 500 787 over due supply,,,,2023 is gonna be year fr boeing ,since airliners r getting confidence in boeing back
737max was always a great plane. It was a software glitch that caused the crash. They fixed it
The A350 is better overall, but the 777x will obviously be better on high demand routes, like Dubai to Heathrow
how is the a350 better
So the 777-9 empty weight is roughly 50 tonnes higher than 350-1000, while MTOW is 42 tonnes higher. There is no way the 777 can be more efficient with it's higher thrust engines.
The max takeoff weight of a 777x is about 36 tons more than that of the a350-1000
777 all the way and has been proven to be an amaxzing aircraft
The Triple-7 is the best large airliner today, after the newest 747s. The 777-X variant will be here soon.
The 777x fuselage ripped badly during ground tests and Boeing brushed it off by saying the burst happened right at the end of the test, so no worries. After some bad landings and flying around in real-world conditions, that fuselage weakness gives me the creeps. Then there was a report that there was some kind of near-disaster during a flight test that is contributing to the delay in getting the plane flying with the airlines. Sir Tim Clark made the comment that Boeing hadn’t done its homework before committing the plane to begin airline flights some years ago. I sure hope airline engineers and the FAA go over the 777x very carefully before starting scheduled flights.
A350-1000 certainly beat 777-9 efficiency in many way.....but Airlines decisions are very complex tasks....so many factors involved 🛫🤓
Well, you seem to forget that the A350-1000 is a smaller airplane than the 777-9 so overall trip cost is lower obviously. However on a per-seat-basis the 777-9 wins*. In the end it's down to the airline and what the airline needs and which airplane works better for them.
*=Based on the 9-abreast A35K. With the new super cramped 10-abreast Economy the A35K may become better. But which airline will be ready to put their reputation on risk by doing this?
All we need is an A350-1000 XL with 30 more seats and the 777X will be redundant, Im surprised Airbus haven’t made an announcement yet, They have indicated but not confirmed..maybe in the future.
A350 especially with the upgrades coming
I think the triple 7 was supposed to have been revised, it would have been ideal if they thought of making it 50 or 60 percent composite in order to reduce its weight and increase fuel efficiency.
nah they were planning on making a new metal alloy, but composites are too risky. look at the 787 production delays becaouse of the composite.
@@Sanyu-Tumusiimebut isn't it getting better due to the R&D done by some companies according to Coby explains video.
The 777X has a completely new composite wing, the fuselage is of Aluminum-Lithium Alloy, which is significantly lighter than standard aluminum.
Boeing launched the 747 in 1966,entered revenue service in 1970,just 4 years,the 777x was launched in 2012 and is due to enter service in 2025,13 years,compare computer technology of the 60s in issues like design and calculations,with today technology,we are going backwards
With the world essentially coming to a screeching halt with Covid in the middle of it. A Ford Model A took a lot less time to build than a modern car too, wanna daily drive one?
like the A380, the 777X it is too big probably, but the 777X has composite wings, but still.. i think the A350 is the ideal.
Not too big for middle eastern airlines and EX 747/a380 operators. I think the 777X will become more popular with orders after deliveries start
I love the A350 its my favorite plane
Please use the metric system
What type of engine is the Boeing 777X?
777 is the one i chose cuz it is larger and a350 meh ok just a little bit shorter
But ........ a350 imo is comfortable than 777
"The 777-X is proceeding nicely through its development.." Hahahah
Luv the wing design of 777x
777 is a little bit better, for airlines weight and capacity matters, also 777-F is more desirable given the TOW.
What is the point of an aircraft, which comes into service a full 10 years after its direct competitor, but still needs 50% more fuel per nautical mile? Even per passenger seat it still burns more than 20% more fuel. Apart from the economics a direct consequence is that A 350 - 1000 accomplishes with a smaller maximum fuel capacity a significant longer range. It is also less expensive. There are more metrics but these are the ones, which count. There is no question which plane is better. Boeing is unlikely to make much profit from the 777x
The a350 is a great modern airliner and the 777 series is the most successful twin engine wide-jet . It's a pity if Boeing can't get its sh*t together and squanders its own engineering heritage.
it’s premature as the 777-9 hasn’t entered service, both are great aircraft…so we’ll see but i’m voting for the 777-9….❤😊
How can a real comparison be made between a proven production aircraft and a prototype?
The MTOW of A350-1000 is 319 Tons and the range is 16,100km
I like the A350, a very comfortable airliner and one of my fav. But the 777 is where my aviation passion built in me when I was a kid, so I prefer the 777x.
B787 is the best 👍
The one in service takes the win.
Triple 7 for me,bigger & more powerful is better but both very good.
Why would you not compare the a350 to the 787 dream liner - All though I do prefer the A350 !
Just curious ?!
because the a330neo competes with the 787
The original 777 was just great. I am European, so of cause I lean towards Airbus. What I wonder most is, that the 777X although quite a bit newer does not offer too much advantage on paper over the now "older" A350; or am I missing something?
B777X wilt best plane out there.
While I enjoy your content, but isn’t this video a little too soon? How can you declare an aircraft that’s been in service for 7yrs to an aircraft that hasn’t flown a single passenger the winner? That’s like comparing the 787 to Boeing’s next clean sheet aircraft that Calhoun says is a couple years off.
They have another 3 years to make a new one 😃
When comparing two - the word is "better".
the one that sells at higher price maybe the best.
You should better compare the 350-900 with 787 and only the 350-1000 with the 777.
Even A350 vs 787 is not a good comparison as the 787-8 and -9 is in the same category as the A330neo.
Totally agree. The A350 is the best aircraft
How did you come to that xonclusiin when the 777X isnt even in service?
#airbusforever
@@heidirabenau511 thats the problem with fanboys. They only support what they want to. True enthusiasts appreciate everything about aviation without showing bias. The fanboys kust ruin it for everyone else. Both the 777 and A350 are amazing aircraft in their own right
@@mh12-47 The A350 is clean sheet design where is the B777-9 is a rehash of an existing airframe design.
@@chrismckellar9350 the 777X has a wider interior and larger windows. Is better looking and it's predecessor has been voted best wide body for long haul..Having a newer airframe doesn't make the 350 better lol. And technically most 777x airframes will be younger than most 350 anyways
A350 quiter, smooth ride, less 💺
777 louder, smooth, more 💺
Both has it's advantages
Long range A350
Short rang 777
A350 is a better aircraft. I loved flying in it! A350-900 is out selling the -1000 by a wide margin. Larger capacity without much better efficiency of 777-9 will hinder its sales. More likely to fill a smaller and make money instead of flying a larger plane that is not full.
For airlines it is all about running costs and fuel economy per seat mile is a major part of that. The B777X is a superb aircraft but suffers in two regards. Despite all the marketing hype about the B777X it is difficult to see the aircraft as anything other than ‘mutton dressed as lamb’. The A350 is a modern design using light weight composite materials and has now established itself as reliable and efficient. The lack of significant order numbers for the B777X indicates that airlines are not convinced.
And yet, even with the A350 already proven and ready to go, there are over 300 orders for the 777-x Every new aircraft has to prove itself, even if it's a newer version of an older aircraft. Airlines may like the new and shiny modern technology of new aircraft, but they also like the reputation and reliability of proven aircraft, which is why the Airbus is selling so many Neo aircraft, and Boeing is still moving so many Max aircraft despite all the issues.
@@sainnt No US-airline has ordered the B 777X, and none will do it, it is the same as for the b 747-8I, and the b 777X will be the same economical failure for Boeing.
@@he8570 It's not going to fail just because US airlines have not ordered it. Only Delta Airlines has ordered the A350, and it's not a failure.
The 747-8i is not a failure because Boeing actually made a profit, compared to the A380 where Airbus didn't. And they sold plenty of cargo variants.
And, US Airlines are not like Middle East and Asia operators who operate gateway hub operations. US airlines are mostly point to point, getting passengers to their international airport hubs by using regional jets, so they don't need that kind of capacity. They also don't operate first class anymore. That explains why they've ordered way more 787 than any widebody Airbus has to offer. The 777-X will be just fine. Once airlines start operating them, other airlines will join. Plus, it's going to enjoy additional success as a cargo variant. The program will be just fine.
I thought the a350 had a ultra long range too?
Singapore Airlines had ordered 30 firm orders Boeing 777-9X to replace All of its older Boeing 777-200ER.
Which is the best? The one that carries real passengers all over the world
One thing nobody has talked about is why the 777-9 is heavier per seat than the A350-1000. Yes, it's because it has an aluminum fuselage -- traditional aluminum too, not even aluminum lithium. But why? It's not like Boeing doesn't know how to do carbon or AlLi structures. Because Boeing wanted an aircraft that is both bigger and CHEAPER to build than the A350. That cheaper part is important because list prices are bullshit and the flexibility to either make great margins or out discount Airbus in a bid often decides who gets the order.
I prefer the A350 for giving better shoulder Room compare to 777X . Somehow Boeing planes are narrow compare to Airbus. 737 Vs A320 and B787 Vs A350.
Hopefully Airbus will come out with a proper 10 abreast air linear. Have a joint venture with Comac as China is a big market.
A330neo competes With 787
Last time I checked the 777 was wider than the A350 and the 787 wider than the A330(/neo).
As a passenger, I like to 8350 better simply because they have a little better technology in the entertainment system like you can watch different parts of the aircraft on cameras, that boeing does not have! My girlfriend is a flight attendant for Qatar Airways and as far as they’re concerned, Boeing is a better aircraft! They say it’s set up better for crewmembers
Wait a minute, did you say the A350’s wings flap while in flight?? A cue from nature?
Wow Airbus A380. My dad’s favorite
WOOHOO! New vid!
350 already flying for few years , the 777x didn't even get certified
777 all the way
Either option is just a flying boxcar stuffed with passengers. No appeal to me at all. Smaller jets, or turbo props, are more
my style.
So go watch videos about those, it's rather simple.
B777X delays feels like intel's 10nm lithography process delays. B777X will give airbus hard times if they able to deliver this aircraft in 2020. But boeing missed their chances just like intel missed their chances to fight amd with proper product stacks.
Such a valid point, now TSMC can do 5nm chips I think and it looks like China has just cracked the 5nm lithography with Alibaba, but Huawei is brining something new to the table, Photonic 5nm and it's a home grown technology where they don't even need to buy lithography machines. Where is Intel? I think somewhere back in the 80s. Why is it that all phones are ARM, Apple is now ARM, none of these need fans but drop a i7 11th gen into a box with Windows and it will run a fan all day with just notepad open. My thoughts are the same, the US is really dropping the ball on tech and I think Asia is going to get the jump. What does the US do now with trying to ban lithography machines for 5nm processing when China now has their own new custom products. And these planes are the same examples, just so far behind, delays, loss of confidence, better products in other markets.
The elephant in the room is 777X or 777 in general is too heavy. 778 simply can't compete with 35K, and chances are a 350-1100 is lighter than a 77W while carrying as many as a 779. I just can't see how 779 can survive this.
Regarding your computer chip analogs, do note that subsequential Zen architectures actually beats Intel in terms of thermal and power consumption, even at some point have superior IPCs? These are traditional Intel strong holds, yet even with Alder Lake they can't reclaim all of these, actually get worse in some aspects.
In both cases I'd say A350 and Ryzen successfully challenge the status quo, and that's good enough for Airbus and AMD alike.
@@steinwaldmadchen I have defected, M1 max is on it's way.
@@tronwars7130 I'm replying to the TO with Arabic name.
Regarding chip, ARM is definitely a serious challenger to x86, just like how x86 challenged other architectures in HPC space. Of course Apple has the talent, resources and demand inhouse to develop a competent Apple Silicon, but they're not the only one. Fugaku for example, is an ARM-based supercomputer developed by Fujitsu, and it's also highly efficient despite its computing power.
Meanwhile for
@@steinwaldmadchen i think since intel lost their edge over amd they didn't have any core's IP efficient enough to beat Zen cores from amd so they know their weakness and try to offer something they can deliver today (leading single-thread performance and competitive multi-thread performance at OK/good price). It isn't the best way to compete with amd but at least that's what intel can do today. They still needs years to catch up with amd but hopefully they can keep their pace.
should be asked: which one is better for passengers? A350 by a long shot.
Why that? The economy seats in the 777X will be just as wide as in the A350. Business and first seats most probably even wider.
Windows are much bigger, cabin altitude is the same. Noise in cabin should be even less (don't know about this one for sure).
given that the 787 fuselage was half or so composite carbon made, why did the 777X not do the same thing? again, one suspects Boeing decided to go the easy way out...
they decided to keep it that way because of the huge change, there are many 777's out there and most of the airlines that use them have gotten used to their maintenance procedures, making a plane with carbon composites would be
1. time consuming
2. very expensive
3. hard for airlines to get used to
if they decided to use composite carbon, it would literally be better for them to make a new plane itself
Air India just placed a super massive order of 500 Jets from both Air Bus and Boeing...😨
The 777x will certainly be better with its wider cabin, Qatar airways will be able to configure their planes better and have more comfortable seats! The two planes are superb but I must say that I prefer the 777x which will undoubtedly be better for the passengers and the pilots but as far as airlines are concerned, the A350 meets more needs and is a little more economical!
& i hope they don't install dimmable windows
@@jirehla-ab1671 the 777X has no dimmable windows.
@@widget787 boeing provides them dimmable windows as an option.
just check sam chui 2023 air show video somewhere in the middle.
Almost seems like Boeing just wants to win a game of top trumps by creating an aircraft with bigger numbers, so they’ve just made a plane that happens to be longer, taller and more capacity, but the important stuff like efficiency isn’t quite there. Almost like when the a380 became a thing, Boeing quickly decided to create a longer 747 that happened to be longer than the a380vand a340, same thing here, airbus makes a new aircraft so Boeing just makes a larger version of one of its current aircraft to compete and win a game of top trumps.
uhhh no? The plane is designed to fit a certain market , the 747 was first built in 1969 wayyy before the a380 (original 747 designed for cargo and for pan am also) , the original 747 100 could carry 480 passengers in a one class config and had a wingspan of 60m and a length of about 71m , the 747-8 can carry 605 in one class with a length of about 76m and wingspan of 68m , it was made to be better in every way compared to the previous 747 family , not to the a380. The 777X in other ways is a twin engines worthy successor to the queen of the skies. Boeing will always be superior in wb deliveries , as it offers conversions for almost every aircraft (except the 787) . Boeing will always be better at making aircraft that are versatile and flexible, while airbus will favor passenger comfortability as its the only thing its known for. And anyways an actual avgeek likes every plane sooooooo
A350-1000. Top choice for Project Sunrise.
A350 XWB
The only bad thing about the a350 is that a had so many flights with hard landings because the a350s gear are out of the basement
Airbus, because not only a350 but all other Airbus planes are very comfortable and very quiet cabin compared to boeing
Trip7 all the way.. USA1 Boeing1 GE1 GM1 Springfield TRP45 ACP
I ❤ Boeing !
Boeing should have also gone for designing an aircraft as a replacement of 757, having single aisle, regional range aircraft with contemporary look instead of sticking to various models of max as it has atleast the same 56 yrs old outlook ___ may like that 787.
Lhe
The A350 it is my favorite aircraft...
A350 has more space but boeing is a more efficient aircraft like the 787 for example
Indeed we all know A350 is best