The Boeing 777X vs The Airbus A380 - What Plane Wins?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 окт 2022
- With the Boeing 747 program coming to an end, the 777X will become the American planemaker’s flagship aircraft.
Over at Airbus, production of the A380 has also ended. Be that as it may, the A380 is a newer plane than most of the passenger 747s produced, and still has a fair bit more flying to do.
So, if we were to spot a Boeing 777X and Airbus A380 parked side by side at an airport sometime in the next few years, which plane would you hypothetically hop aboard? Let’s compare the two jets in today’s long haul video!
Article: simpleflying.com/boeing-777x-...
Our Social Media:
/ simpleflyin. .
/ simple_flying
/ simpleflying. .
Our Website
simpleflying.com/
For copyright matters please contact us at: legal@valnetinc.com 
Развлечения
Hit the nail on the head when saying airlines might not like the a380 (due to operational costs) but passengers love it. Its the most comfortable plane I have ever flown on. It feels so spacious in 10 abreast economy, plus its super smooth and quiet.
The only problem with the twin-engined widebodies is that airlines try to profit too much. It would've been spacious if it wasn't for them cramming every seat they can.
Yeah, well. . . I’d far prefer to have gone ANYWHERE in my Cessna 172. . . but. . . affordability. . . The 380 can only go to a small range of airports.
I need to fly on a 380 again to see if it really lives up to all the praise, it’s been 7 years since my last A380 flight…. I was a kid at the time, so any plane was exciting and felt the same. Now I’m older, I can validate whether people who wax lyrical about the A380 are just enamoured by the aircraft’s size and the occasion, or if it really is an airborne lounge.
@@magnustan841 if u were a kid 7 years ago….u are still a kid today. 😂
It certainly was quiet and had quite a bit of room, but the super thick windows limit my views... and that's not something to love.
simple flying on the 787 :
many people don’t like flying on the 787
me: large windows , quiet cabin and those cool chevrons. what’s not to love
The A380 is definitely the better plane when it comes to choice, even though it is a quad jet it still better in carrying passenger numbers from A-B. but then again the 777 has the better technology now. I would love to fly on the A380 again before they are all phased out. in future there will only be one option. the 777-9X. also the A380 is less fuel efficient due to its seize and engines numbers.
777x is better because it has much better runway performance
I haven't flown a 777 yet, but the A380 was so quiet. It was wonderful.
I love the 777 but definitely prefer A380 as a passenger
119 A380s?!!?!!? holy cow
I was surprised to hear the 787 Dreamliner isn’t popular with passengers. I have honestly never heard any complaints about them.
Its the windows that make it such a bad pasenger expirience
@@astroboy4653 perhaps. On my last few flights I’ve sat in aisle seats, and passengers next to the windows keep them covered as much as possible. Do windows matter any more? Most passengers seem to HATE them now!
@@markiangooley I think that from a recording viev it is still better to have shutter windows because the flight attendants can control the windows and half of the time they had them not dimmed and then they forget about it so yeah bye.
I hate the 787 QANTAS have them and are trying to force them on the Oz -UK trip. But they are a pain after the 380.
Let me enjoy my fucking eye-blinding sunrise you mfs REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
One thing they didn't mention is airport availability (unless I missed it). The A380 is very limited to the airports it can fly into. While they 777x with the fold up tips will be able to fly into nearly all major airports. I'm lucky enough to have seen it fly as we live in the testing area. It will be a nice addition to the commercial skies for sure. As far as comfort goes. That is subjective. I think airlines that use the A380 put a lot of effort making it a premier flying experience. A320 vs 737. They both are just buses in the sky. Comfort is not a major concern for most carriers.
A380 cabin width is 6.6m, not 5.8m as identified in your table. It’s significantly wider than the 777X cabin.
The 777x is the successor to the 777-300Er and that plane is not ready to be replaced yet so it makes sense that the 777x will come in the near future so by the time they role of the production line airlines will have a suitable replacement for 747-400s and 777-300Er
0:30 - 0:35
I would board on whichever I booked my ticket on.
The 777X if it released, it has previous generations and a freighter. Nice video. Keep up the good work.
Love your videos, thank you 👌
A car guy that’s an aviation geek. Joe you’re special.
I remember an article in a specialized magazine that tried to predict the future of air travel. Two ideas are represented; according to the first, everything should have remained the way air traffic has been organized since the 60s and 70s of the last century, but airline companies only should flew more efficient and less noise/Co² poluting planes. Another approach envisioned a smaller number of large aircraft transporting large number of passengers from large and commercially viable long-haul airports to similar-sized airports on other continents. In addition to these large transport hubs, there were also medium-sized transport hubs within the all aray of transport hubs, from where passengers would be fly to their final destination in a smaller airport by smaller or medium-sized aircraft, depending on the number of passengers or cost efficient lines. The number of passengers would stabilize after some time and serve as a "measuring tool" for airlines and, along with other market trends, would help airlines select new aircraft models according to passenger capacity, fuel consumption and application of new technologies. It seems to me that Airbus predicted the future of global air traffic much better, but that is why Boeing focused on the production of medium-sized aircraft.
The A380 was designed for a hub and spoke system. Boeing was right at the time; airlines and passengers were moving to a point to point organisation, avoiding change overs and flying directly to their destination. Boeing designed the 787 instead, that was spot on.
The A380 was twenty years to late. The airbus engineers had envied the 747 for so long, they designed a better plane for a vanishing market.
No doubt, airlines will progressively retire the A380 once they receive the 787, A350 and 777x in sufficient numbers to do so.
There is no future for triple or quadruple engine planes. Then can't compete on efficiency.
It would be gread to see a a380 wit 2 engins in the future
I fly Emirates Saigon, Dubai, London or Birmingham routes, the Saigon Dubai leg is on a B777, and the second leg is on an A380. Both outbound and inbound are overnight flights and so my body wants sleep. The A380 business seating package is the best I've used, with the 777 more coffin like and does not allow for turning with ease. Also, it's a two-seat arrangement on the window sides of the aircraft. The A380s bar is great to wander to and have a beer standing at the bar. Sadly, Emirates do not offer the A380 on the Saigon leg.
We just want 2-4-2 configuration aircrafts. That's all we ask for.
The Boeing 777X short takeoff is amazing, measuring 251 feet, the aircraft can seat 426 passengers in a standard two-class configuration, and is longer than both its predecessor the 777-300ER (242 feet 4 inches) and the Airbus A350-1000, which has a length of just over 242 feet. There are are other good features that has to be seen in person.
I'll hop on the A380. I'm just a more airbus guy and i find the A380the most comfortable ever (3-4-3 economy ) seconding my opinion is the A350-900/900ULR(3-3-3 economy) Its just its memories in the A380that will never draw me away (My first flight wasin a Singapore A380 since then ive flown it 12 times)
For A380 as long as they able to make a full capacity for everyflight then it is worth it. When it come 777x based on papers the efficiency is the very key of this type, even if the plane is not full cap. it is still has positive income since the overall plane make it cheaper for maintenance too.
As has been said, none of us can know what the 777X will be like for passengers. My order of preference of existing aircraft type would be:
1. A380
2. A350-900
3. 777-300ER
4. A330-300
5. B787-9
When I fly, it’s ultra-long haul. Even though the 787 is pressurised to a lower altitude and has better climate control than some of these older aircraft, it just feels very small inside.
please tell me turbulence comparison between the two, i am flying in 3 days , and really nervous. is A380 better than boeing in terms of turbulence due to its big size?
A380 definitely wins our hearts & memories
From an economy passenger's perspective (annual trips from Australia to UK and back), the A380 is quieter and smoother than anything else. The old 777ER was nearly as good. The 787 is somewhat behind - the only plane that has ever made me throw up in turbulence. And yes, when booking this year's flights, aircraft type was important.
Indeed. 3 years ago, I flew a 777-300ER to Singapore with Singapore Airlines, but about a month ago i used Qantas instead, with their QF1 flight to Singapore. The A380 that Qantas uses for QF1 is far more comfortable (excluding passenger service, but that was affected by covid) than the SQ 777-300. Airbus really put passenger comfort as their priority.
Not sure how the 787 is behind the 777-300er considering all the better things it have.
Planes like the 777-300ER are still fairly new and performing well. Once airlines need to retire these Im sure they’ll be more than happy to switch to 777X.
There is no guarantee. The B787 and A350 are newer airframe designs, have operational history and and cheaper than the B777-9.
@@chrismckellar9350 B787 I highly doubt it. Size and capacity it’s not even close to the 777. A350-1000 is possible yeah but bear in mind opting for the 777X will reduce crew training costs and also loyal customers may get a good deal from Boeing
@@chrismckellar9350 787’s havé very good range but in size they’re probably comparable to like a 767 or an A330
@@y66nick - The way things are going with increasing global uncertainty and effects of a warming planet, will have an impact of medium to ultra long haul air travel, moving towards direct non stop 'point to point' travel will favours the B787 all variants and/or the A350 all variants. The B777-9 is expensive rehash airframe design and will not have the sales like the B787 and the A350 especially since Boeing and Airbus have been fine tuning their airframe designs to get extra range on a tank of fuel. Even with these enhancements, plus both aircraft types are still be cheaper than the B777-9.
@@y66nick - Which variant of the B787 are you referring too that probably is comparable to like a 767 or an A330?
I do love these comparison video’s, there is of course a massive difference between the two, the A380 is flying around the world successfully and without any controversy over its certification. The B777x however is not yet certified, if the current war between Boeing and the FAA is anything to go by, it might not be certified, if it is eventually certified it might just have missed the boat as far as long range high density travel is concerned as most operators have already gone for either the A380 or the A350.
You should try and get some more background music, only 2 or 3 library music tunes that run on loop in every video
Those tracks are sick though, please don't stop using them Simple Flying
One airplane has already been retired and the other is still riding on a promise. How long its comeback lasts could depend on the confidence in the other to prove it’s worth the wait.
I for one am glad to see the A380s fly a few more years. Saying the 777X is "riding on a promise" is a bit harsh. With 4 prototypes flying it is a matter of when not if.
@@danharold3087 that was to contrast with how swiftly others and also non-aviator reporters and analysts from all reliable news houses jumped in to bash on the economics argument initially made for the A380 to fly.
Just like with a toddler demanding something to reject it once provided, all turned on a dime the minute the trend took momentum.
It completely ignored the commitments, investments and the awareness to the public, tailored to integrate that jet in the passengers flying choices.
Many airports and other vendors accepted to adjust their facilities and services to accommodate the A380.
There are many airlines that regularly fly practically empty, it's a common practice in their logistics, even to recently issue a letter of apology for having contributed to carbon emissions. There must be something else beyond the quad jet operations and maintenance that triggered its demise. I miss the 747, and the Concorde that have been around since the late sixties.
Thank you for your reply.
Ones in production and the others production has ended. Seems that would be a point to bring up in this video.
What is the background music?
Most passengers hate the 787? What are you guys smoking over there.
No one said most passengers hate the 787…
@@MrSchwabentier did you not watch the video?
@@tommy7873 i did. I recommend you watch it again and then check the difference between „many“ and „most“…
@@MrSchwabentier my bad, he indeed said many, and not most.
For passengers, hands down the A380 dominates. With the much higher demand these days and the lack of crew and ramp service, these two along with the Queen of the skies will be in need fortunately. Emirates already asked for an updated A380! Kinda makes you think if the A321XLR is the right choice for legacy carriers...
pax can be misused. It is not yet airplane characteristic like number of seats but might be a sign of misusing the plane, or simply - using it in the wrong routes, isn't it?
boeing have a winner once again coming to the market 777-9 ,8 wow.
A380 looks like a military aircraft and flying on Emirates cattle class or business class is a fantastic experience.
08:15 - Since when has the Dreamliner become unpopular with passengers? Am I missing something here??
We must continue explore all avenue to space and large airplane is closest beginning. Dare to dream will either make it or break us while making us
It’s not just fuel consumption but maintenance of twice as many engines…
A thinly-veiled Boeing advert? I look forward to comparisons when the 777X has been flying a while. It just goes to show how eagerly awaited the 777x actually is.
The B777x was developed as a replacement of the B777-200 primarily and the B747-400, but since the decision of many airlines to retired early the A380, then the B777X have become the best option currently in the market. If Boeing decides to launch the B797 as the replacement for both the 757 and 767, then Airbus will not have much options to offer but to keep upgrading theirs planes to make them Neo with more efficient engines and new wings.
The NMA won’t replace the 767.
The 787 is officially the 767’s successor as a passenger plane. The 767 is still being produced for cargo application though I would imagine that once Boeing releases a 787F, I’m sure the big cargo airlines like UPS and FedEx will start operating those to replace both older 767Fs and A300Fs.
When the B777x comes out, it will be the King of the Skies, just like it’s two predecessors, the Queen of the Skies in the B747, and the Princess/Prince of the Skies in the B787. Can’t wait for it’s eventual roll out (5 years behind). But the pandemic sort helped Boeing by 2 years
I am surprised by the fuel cost charts u used
As i prefer max capacity of fuel tanks/typical capacity passengers/ max distance that will give liter(gallon or kg) per passenger per km( or miles)
I must try to fly onboard the A380 as soon as possible but time will tell me. Unfortunately, Malaysia Airlines and China Southern Airlines will be retired there A380s by the end of 2022
the 450-500 passenger twin jet single deck plane called the Airbus A370 will enter service in 2035 and it will run on 100% SAF.
Hi there , please sync the subtitles up with the video . Thank you!
I like the a380 more because it’s amazing how such a big thing is taking off. In my mind the a380 looks just better.
A830 !!!!!!!!! i hope it doesnt go nowhere it was the smoothest plane ive been on
You can't compare two planes that are so vastly different in capacity. To even suggest the 777X is "as good as" an A380 is hilarious.
And Emirates is requesting that Airbus make a few "Super" A380s for them exclusively. I doubt that will happen but they might do a one-off version to appease them.
TRUE , its better.
Whats up with those captions. Weird
While I have onlt been on the A380 once I loved it and I did fly 3 long haul on 777 to compare while not 777x likey not much change
I would get on the one that was flying to where I wanted to go to. The one I have a ticket for. I’m not sure you understand how airports work.
380s are more popular with the passengers but the operators hate them.
8:16 "...a plane that airlines like, but many passengers don't."
I have not flown on a B787 Dreamliner. So I ask, what do passengers not like about the Dreamliner?
It is not an airbus.
@@danharold3087 #airbusforever #airbusforthewin #airbusforthewin
@@heidirabenau511 Do you hold a significant block of Airbus Stock Heidi ?
the windows shades, which they claim to be controlled by the crew (i believe this only happens on overnight flights)
@@heidirabenau511
The video and audio files are about Boeing 777X versus A380. The text file has nothing to do with the video, it's all about 777X versus A350 and other planes. Weird.
Not the same. It’s 777X vs 350-1000. That was the Qantas competition Operation Sunrise. The A-350 won. Non stop flights Sydney - London Heathrow.
Capacity
A350-1000 : 369 seats
777-8 : 384 seats
777-9 : 426 seats
This will shock most of you to hear this; the 777X is only 9 ft longer than a 777-300 ! It has a larger capacity it would seem by cramming more seats in.
It’s not some super large plane, nothing like an A380 which has an extra 100 seat capacity over the 777X
It’s also note worthy that the new GE9X power units produce *less* thrust than the GE90-115b units that are fitted to the dash 300 fleet.
I just hope Boeing don't pull off a large scale 737MAX on the 777X
A single deck wide body passenger jet can never win over a double decker wider body A 380, which features attractive upper deck amenities.
thank you for using takeoff mass instead of takeoff weight.
If Emirates likes the A380 and makes money flying it they can add slightly-used aircraft to their fleet by purchasing at a discount from other airlines that are retiring the model. That could be a better deal financially than adding the new 777X.
The confort of any plane is related to the airline company owning the plane. If is Singapore Air the confort should be superb…if the company is a local Japanese company doing flights low cost, they can pile up 40% more passenger into it. I am an ex Boeing Tech and there is not this plane is better than this other one…the end product out of the assembly line is a plane with an empty shell that is waiting for the seating arrangement ordered by the airline company.
im going to hop on the 777x
I think you are missing Cathay Pacific in the 777x orders
Etihad only getting six as well.
Wow hard to say.
Boeing should be thankful that the 777x didn't enter service in 2020. The would have been a horrible time for a new long haul high demand/capacity plane to enter service given the restrictions brought on by the pandemic.
777x is Coming, when?!?
You forgot Lufhansa also bought many 777x planes
Airbus can produce new aircraft by using the a380,remove the upper deck make the plane just two engine and keep the size..so it will be A370,orA390.
I wonder if A380 with a new wing design and engines might improve its economics at a reasonable cost. If this was the case then 77X might be less atractive. What about a double deck A350?
An updated 380 simply not in the cards. Airbus has already reallocated the assembly faciality and demand for it is too low.
8:23 Passengers don't like the Dreamliner?!?!? How suprising.
In time Boeing will come out with 777-10 due to demand from rising passenger long haul volume. That one will seat 450+ and ease transition some from retiring a380…I bet this will occur
Really, with the long certification progress and the 777-9 is running 5 years pate and the 777-8 passenger variant is at the risk of being scrapped and has no firm orders for the passenger variant, so it looks like it is unlikely that the 777-10 will ever enter service
@@heidirabenau511 why, just because you say so?
What will airbus replace it's 100+ a380s with then?
There is no comparison. They are two vary different types of aircraft.
Having flown on both of these aircraft the A380 is a RollsRoyce. The 777 is an updated 1960 Ford.
One is large, quiet and smooth. The other noisy and cramped. If you don’t agree you are just a key board aviator who has NEVER BEEN IN AN A380.
To summarize A380 vs 777 debate:
Passengers - A380
Airlines - 777
Boeing put profits ahead of human lives. I will always fly Airbus if I can help it. I wish southwest would switch to Airbus
A380 by far. It is in service, it's flying daily. Boeing is five years late into service.
Having flown both within a week of each other, A380 is much better for the passenger
You haven’t flown on a 777x
How can you compare a aircraft that doesn't exist to a aircraft that should never have existed?
7777x hands down. Fuel efficiency along gets Boeing the win. Also passengers want more frequency and direct flights. A380 is too large for most non hub to hub flights. This isn’t even close.
Boeing 777-8 and 777-9 easily.
Boeing can t beat never against Airbus when it comes to safety
But you forgot that the A380 thanks to its capacity has lower fuel burn per passenger than the 777X.
No it doesn't. 🤦😂😂Lol
@@mmm0404 per passengers the A380 is a fuel efficient plane but for lower demand route it is not profitable
@@heidirabenau511 no it's not. The 777X will have a seat cost similar to the 787 and a350 , that's definitely lower than the a380...
Don't tell me just because the a380 can seat 500+ seats that it now has a lower seat cost . It's quite very heavy and has one of the Poorest seat cost performances of any modern jet
a380
An older airframe in service is better than two airframes on an order book. News of the A380’s death was premature.
Just flown 777 from London to Bangkok and back economy class. Nightmare. Very cramped within the aircraft and only having one door to enter and exit the aircraft is awful. Give me the A380 widebodied spacious four engines over the 777 any day.
I love the 777 it’s going to be the king of the skies
A380 is the best plane ever made
A very subjective best. :)
#airbusforever #airbusforlife #airbusforthewin
Yeah I agree
I have traveled in all the major aircraft of boeing and airbus..right from 320 to 380 ....737 to 747
Personally as a passenger airbus is more pleasant experience than boeing
A380.
A380 definitely *WON* because 777x not yet show up for competition.
777
Fuel comparisons should be on a per seat basis, not aircraft mass.
A380
A380 .....or ......the stablemate of the 737max , the 777 , eerrrmmm....let me think ,
Far more flexibility in the 77X compared to the A380, and much more opportunity for making money.
From a passengers standpoint The A380 is the better plane. Ignoring ticket price it would always be my first choice.
But the 777X is the ones airlines want to fly.
@@danharold3087 - except for the landings, I would agree with you. I also prefer Boeing, from my understanding of the Airbus philosophy of flight.
@@EdOeuna #airbusforever #airbusforthewin #airbusforlife
@@heidirabenau511 #whyallthehashtags?
Boeing 777X is a better plane. But Airbus A380 gives a more enjoyable ride
My preference would be to stay off a new Boeing type for the first few years. Managers at Boeing and regulators at the FAA need to earn my trust back.
And who are you exactly?
@@mmm0404 The passengers who have to put their life in the hand of those people?
B777_9x ,73mert
A380 hands down
cathay pacific fly 777x is better