Check out the Store: growling-sidewinder.creator-spring.com/ Thanks for watching and I hope you enjoyed the video let me know if you'd like to see more videos of this nature in the future. Thanks again and take care, much Love.
Great video as always! But doesn´t the Eurofighter carry the Meteor instead of the AMRAAM? And would it be possible to make a bandit unknown in the Eurofighter?
You just know there was some steering committee early on in the project that was responsible for the naming conventions that spent an entire meeting giggling and trying to work up the courage to tell their commanding officers the name they had settled on.
@@augiehicks4588 I still wanna see that kill reproduced by Growling Sidewinder eventually, would be a really cool fucking video. He's been doing so much A-10 A2G recently, why not F-15 A2G? Let's pickle ourselves a Hind eh?
2 года назад+129
"Today in Growling Sidewinder School"... I've learned more about fighter jets by watching your videos in the last couple of years than in my entire life.
I really like this educational format, I always wished there was more stuff like this on youtube. Thanks for the quality content and info! Maybe in the future would you consider talking about the history of RWR? I'd be curious to know how it works/how it came about
very informative content, perhaps a similar vid for the soviet/eastern munitions, where data is available...? or a comparison of west vs east. AIM9 R27? AIM120 R77? etc.
7:57 Oops! Your final statement is opposite to the entirety of the rest of the video. I heard it as "It can hardly be argued that the AMRAAM is one of the world's best air-to-air missiles." I think you meant to say that one cannot argue AGAINST the proposition that the AMRAAM is one of the world's best air-to-air missiles. Perhaps it should have been, "It can't be disputed that the AMRAAM . . . ." or "It can hardly be disputed that . . . ." Great video!
The best thing with the meteor is not the range. It's its ramjet propulsion that makes its flight energy profile totally different from a traditional missile. It has more maneuverability even during it's final flight phase thanks to it's capacity to keep burning propellant continuously.
@@ZratP exactly, it’s not about range but how lethal it is at different ranges. It’s no point going a long range if you can’t hit anything. Ramjet stay’s lethal.
@@ZratP very true, the ramjet allows the meteor to essentially be "burning" throughout basically the entirety of its flight meaning it loses little to no kinetic energy
Quite different than your usual style of video, but I liked it. Very well organized and put together. Good information that we can probably see put to use in future videos. Nice job, GS.
While the AIM-120 series is an excellent platform it realistically does not hold up to the likes of the Meteor or perhaps even the PL-15, the DOD and the U.S military are acutely aware of this and are attempting to alleviate this with the development of the AIM-260 JATM, what little we know of that program (relatively), it appears to be the next gold standard in long range ARH missile technology.
If we look at Desert Storm, we can surmise that a true full air battle with fourth gen fighters still requires visual identification or clear awacs id to choose to engage enemies with fox-3 missiles. The AMRAAM fits that envelope so perfectly. Long range seems to be a full WW3 idea.
i really love your diversity of videos man. especially the dogfight and multicrew ones. but i didn't know i'd love your educational videos about military aviation and weaponry. big fan of your DCS radar tutorials btw.
The Ass Ram missile, although very capable, lacked the required lubricant hydraulics for optimal performance during high G spot maneuvers. The missile was later banned by the Geneva convention.
GS, man absolutely love this style of video. You have a different perspective to other RUclipsrs who do military info channels since you get to use a lot of the equipment and are intimately familiar with the shortfalls and benefits of each! Would LOVE to see more videos like this on other weapons (AIM-9, 7, 54, etc…)
Great video growling you should really do it more of these you have an endless catalog of aircraft and weapons to choose from ! Can't wait for the next one it's a great change of pace just like how the ground videos were not sure if many others would agree but I liked it!
@@Penglish56 bruh "best combat proven is the amraam" you mean the sidewinder? which has been in service for almost 3x as long as the amraam, and has the most kills out of any A2A missile.
Higher kill count doesn't equal better, unless you are trying to say that the Sparrow and AIM54 are better than the AMRAAM. The point I was making is that without having seen the Meteor in combat, it's impossible to say how it actually will perform and whether or not it is actually better than the AMRAAM. Idk why you have to be so condescending either lol calm down
@@manofchaitea6904 the same actual combat evidence that put the F-22 as the BETTER air dominance fighter jet in the world, even with a 0 score. 🙃 As i say, the METEOR is in a level ABOVE the AMRAAM.
@@cayancesardeoliveira5708 Actually that not true. The f-22 have seen mock combat against other platforms like the f-15, f-16 in which the f-22 could beat them without being seen.
@@peterp4037 same as METEOR 🤷🏻♂️. The NEZ of the METEOR is 3x the NEZ of the AMRAAM. In mock combat against planes with AMRAAM, the fighter with METEOR outrange the fighter with AMRAAM by far.
Thank you for pointing out the Canadair contribution to the Sparrow II program. Douglas and the USN gave up on the Sparrow II in 1955. RCAF chose the Sparrow II and Falcon missile for the Avro Arrow with the Astra fire control system. I believe Canadair kept this weapons system alive to be improved to the AAMRAM we have today.
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't, by subtracting where it is, from where it isn't, or where it isn't, from where it is, whichever is greater, it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance sub-system uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is, to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position where it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event of the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has required a variation. The variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too, may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computance scenario works as follows: Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is, however it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subracts where it should be, from where it wasn't, or vice versa. By differentiating this from the algebraic sum og where it shouldn't be, and where it was. It is able to obtain a deviation, and a variation, which is called "air"
Ian McCollum : "Today on Forgotten Weapons we have Growling Sidewinder, he's going to introduce us to one of the favorite weapon systems for fighter pilots to hate on, the Aim Seven Radar guided missile." GS "Thanks for having me Ian. The Aim Seven Sparrow, shared none of the pin point accuracy of that little feathered hunter we see in the wild, the aerial acrobat it was named after, plucking insects out of the air with stunning precision... this thing is more like a near sighted seagull that notices nothing smaller than a garbage barge... illuminated by a search light. Let's examine why for a moment..."
Damn love this kind of video from you. Honestly your voice has some soothing quality to it, optimal especially when doing a short documentary about things that go pssssshhh BOOOM
@@MrHistorian123 And what if in its first actual combat use we manage to find out the AMRAAM is better? Many faces have had egg on it over weapons that were better on paper.
@@ChucksSEADnDEAD Please tell me HOW the AMRAAM will possibly be better. Given that the Meteor outperforms it in every single respect, I think that's highly unlikely. And Meteor has been tested and performed to spec in every scenario.
Nicely done. Should of mentioned the unofficial name "Slammer", too. We don't know much about the AIM-260 yet, so naming the AIM-120 the 'best' is a bit difficult. 'Most Proven', 'Most Effective' (ie having an effect)? Certainly.
Best in terms of what? It most certainly beats the trial missiles in terms of availability. Also, while something is in trial, I would refrain it from comparing it with anything, or even qualifying it as a weapon. These are experiments, and usually have tons of unresolved issues (see Mk.14 torpedo for reference).
@@balazsfoldes4700 AIM-260 was _supposed_ to have an IOC of 2022, so it's probably well past trials by now. And yes, new weapons are almost always plagued with teething issues. We really can't say much more, though if it's supposed to replace the Slammer I would say it is to the AMRAAM what the AMRAAM was to the Sparrow. Time will tell.
I love this new way your videos are! I like how it’s very informative and a bunch of videos and pictures to watch. You are very good at making videos like this as I was paying attention the whole time 😂
Python 5, thrust vectoring and more manuevering points that any other missile out something like 18 or 24, and speeds up upon impact i dont think any other missile speeds up upon impact. If what ive seen on them is true, those things will reacquire if it misses. Pretty sure you had a video on one no ?
Hey GS I’d love to see a video where a jet like the F35 can shine, it’s obviously not strongest as a solo dog fighter but is really good in conjunction with other aircraft, could we see a video series where a given jet is set up for the most success, the mission plays to the strengths of the jet? The offset videos are neat where a jet performs where it’s doesn’t play to its strengths but I think it would be neat to see a jet shine, is the F/A-18 hornet best as a dog fighter or more as a strike/attack aircraft; the A10 close air support videos are grey cuz we get to see what the A10 is built for
Missiles are like melee weapons and the aircraft; the weilder. Compared to other melee weapons, the AMRAAM may be outranged or less lethal, but in the hands of an F-22 or F-35, it's still going to be an incredible weapon.
i like how you have such varied content. i prefer the dcs and other flight sim but videos like this are really top notch and i hope you continue to make this type of content
Love these nuggets of knowledge style videos... Oh, make more memes for instagram please . The last few ones (especially the mig 29 and multiple eurofighter one) were absolute gem..
Check out the Store: growling-sidewinder.creator-spring.com/
Thanks for watching and I hope you enjoyed the video let me know if you'd like to see more videos of this nature in the future. Thanks again and take care, much Love.
Great video as always! But doesn´t the Eurofighter carry the Meteor instead of the AMRAAM? And would it be possible to make a bandit unknown in the Eurofighter?
Yes, please.
@@Anarchy_420 raptor has just 8 internal hardpoints 2 of them fox 2 so its going to be atleast 1 kill with guns. would be funn to watch
@@blxuermaster9454 i think it carries a mix of it since you don´t need to many meteors and its larger and havier the the amraam
Yes more video's like this one......Thanks my friend.....
Shoe🇺🇸
You got to love calling a missile designed to fly up a jet's tailpipe an ASRAAM. 😄
Definitely did it on purpose lmao
Lmao, How did I not notice until now?
LOL
You just know there was some steering committee early on in the project that was responsible for the naming conventions that spent an entire meeting giggling and trying to work up the courage to tell their commanding officers the name they had settled on.
It's the most British thing possible to give a very serious subject a rude yet descriptive acronym.
when going by sheer numbers of a2a kills, the gbu-10 trumps the meteor 1-0...
😂
GBU-10*
I assume you're referring to when the F-15E scored an AA kill against a Hind I believe it was, in which case that was a GBU-10 not a 12.
@SpaceKraken and @Augie Hicks thanks i'll change it
@@augiehicks4588 I still wanna see that kill reproduced by Growling Sidewinder eventually, would be a really cool fucking video. He's been doing so much A-10 A2G recently, why not F-15 A2G? Let's pickle ourselves a Hind eh?
"Today in Growling Sidewinder School"... I've learned more about fighter jets by watching your videos in the last couple of years than in my entire life.
this!
I really like this educational format, I always wished there was more stuff like this on youtube. Thanks for the quality content and info!
Maybe in the future would you consider talking about the history of RWR? I'd be curious to know how it works/how it came about
I respectfully second that request!
very informative content, perhaps a similar vid for the soviet/eastern munitions, where data is available...? or a comparison of west vs east.
AIM9 R27?
AIM120 R77?
etc.
A better comparison would be aim9 and r73 because the r73 is intended for close range launches, whereas the r27 is intended for medium ranges.
for me, Meteor remains the better existing Fox-3 missile
7:57 Oops! Your final statement is opposite to the entirety of the rest of the video. I heard it as "It can hardly be argued that the AMRAAM is one of the world's best air-to-air missiles." I think you meant to say that one cannot argue AGAINST the proposition that the AMRAAM is one of the world's best air-to-air missiles. Perhaps it should have been, "It can't be disputed that the AMRAAM . . . ." or "It can hardly be disputed that . . . ." Great video!
I don't know--the MDBA _Meteor_ has to potential to be even better due to its enormous range (more than twice that of AMRAAM).
The *stated* range might be twice that of the AMRAAM, but the numbers we civilians see are totally inaccurate and meaningless.
@@DefinitelyNotEmma the stated IOC date is 2022, the Air Force could just be secretive about it for all we know
The best thing with the meteor is not the range. It's its ramjet propulsion that makes its flight energy profile totally different from a traditional missile.
It has more maneuverability even during it's final flight phase thanks to it's capacity to keep burning propellant continuously.
@@ZratP exactly, it’s not about range but how lethal it is at different ranges. It’s no point going a long range if you can’t hit anything. Ramjet stay’s lethal.
@@ZratP very true, the ramjet allows the meteor to essentially be "burning" throughout basically the entirety of its flight meaning it loses little to no kinetic energy
More videos like this please! I love the little educational/ historical backstories you occasionally put out here for us.
Excellent explanation @GS. These mini documentaries are packed with information and well produced.
thank you very much much appreciated.
That video of the F16 landing gear doors with Sparrows was super neat
I know right never knew about that mounting
Quite different than your usual style of video, but I liked it. Very well organized and put together. Good information that we can probably see put to use in future videos. Nice job, GS.
They have the AIM-260 and the Peregrine missile coming soon
While the AIM-120 series is an excellent platform it realistically does not hold up to the likes of the Meteor or perhaps even the PL-15, the DOD and the U.S military are acutely aware of this and are attempting to alleviate this with the development of the AIM-260 JATM, what little we know of that program (relatively), it appears to be the next gold standard in long range ARH missile technology.
So the meteor and PL-15 have been used in air combat? Nope. Speculation does no determine who is better.
@@manofchaitea6904 So the F-22 and F-35 aren't better than an F-15C and F-16?
Because the first two have never seen combat, the older two have 😉
@@johannafischer8915 except the F22 and F35 have? They're all great platforms.
If we look at Desert Storm, we can surmise that a true full air battle with fourth gen fighters still requires visual identification or clear awacs id to choose to engage enemies with fox-3 missiles. The AMRAAM fits that envelope so perfectly. Long range seems to be a full WW3 idea.
@@Agent_Sparkle when? Against air opponents?
i really love your diversity of videos man. especially the dogfight and multicrew ones. but i didn't know i'd love your educational videos about military aviation and weaponry. big fan of your DCS radar tutorials btw.
thank you man, I really appreciate your support. Much Love.
The Ass Ram missile, although very capable, lacked the required lubricant hydraulics for optimal performance during high G spot maneuvers. The missile was later banned by the Geneva convention.
GS, man absolutely love this style of video. You have a different perspective to other RUclipsrs who do military info channels since you get to use a lot of the equipment and are intimately familiar with the shortfalls and benefits of each! Would LOVE to see more videos like this on other weapons (AIM-9, 7, 54, etc…)
Great video growling you should really do it more of these you have an endless catalog of aircraft and weapons to choose from !
Can't wait for the next one it's a great change of pace just like how the ground videos were not sure if many others would agree but I liked it!
Nice job on the mini-documentary! I would definitely like to see more like this.
The Meteor is the best missile. The AIM-120 is the most widely used
Not combat proven. In theory it could be the best, but currently the best combat proven air-to-air missile is the AMRAAM.
@@Penglish56 bruh "best combat proven is the amraam" you mean the sidewinder? which has been in service for almost 3x as long as the amraam, and has the most kills out of any A2A missile.
@@Doomsday499 considering the video is about medium-long range missiles, I don't think that really applies here.
@@Penglish56 AMRAAM estimated confirmed kills: 16
Sparrow estimated confirmed kills: 55
Phoenix estimated confirmed kills: 78
Interesting thought process you got going on.
Higher kill count doesn't equal better, unless you are trying to say that the Sparrow and AIM54 are better than the AMRAAM. The point I was making is that without having seen the Meteor in combat, it's impossible to say how it actually will perform and whether or not it is actually better than the AMRAAM.
Idk why you have to be so condescending either lol calm down
I'd love to see a video like this about the Meteor.
I think the METEOR is in a category above the AMRAAM.
According to what actual combat evidence?
@@manofchaitea6904 the same actual combat evidence that put the F-22 as the BETTER air dominance fighter jet in the world, even with a 0 score.
🙃
As i say, the METEOR is in a level ABOVE the AMRAAM.
@@cayancesardeoliveira5708 You absolutely owned him there 😂😂😂
@@cayancesardeoliveira5708 Actually that not true. The f-22 have seen mock combat against other platforms like the f-15, f-16 in which the f-22 could beat them without being seen.
@@peterp4037 same as METEOR 🤷🏻♂️. The NEZ of the METEOR is 3x the NEZ of the AMRAAM. In mock combat against planes with AMRAAM, the fighter with METEOR outrange the fighter with AMRAAM by far.
0:58 A fox 3 going active is called Pitbull or Husky depending if it goes active in Medium PRF or High PRF.
Showing the Sparrows mounted to the gear bay doors just sent me on a rabbit hole... thanks...
Right?! I want to see more on that!
That was a well put-together little mini documentary and I definitely didn't burst my sides when you said ass ram.
Nice little documentary. As a European I'd enjoy a similar video about the Meteor :)
you should do a 2022 setup tour, see what gear ur using in todays sim market, opinions on them to date and what not before the holidays and what not👀
Thank you for pointing out the Canadair contribution to the Sparrow II program. Douglas and the USN gave up on the Sparrow II in 1955. RCAF chose the Sparrow II and Falcon missile for the Avro Arrow with the Astra fire control system. I believe Canadair kept this weapons system alive to be improved to the AAMRAM we have today.
mentions the gripen but not the rafale, what a chad move
For anyone thinking gs plays games for a living is sorely mistaken dude puts in work a lot of work this video was amazing
much love Jared. Great comment. All the hard work is worth it when people like you watch.
Videos like this remind me of growing up in the 90s watching Weekday Wings (only...on the Discovery channel--RIP Discovery ;( ). Awesome stuff.
Well, i wish we knew about the Meteor missile and JATM 260. Imagine getting smacked without any warning
Fantastic video, man! Can you do more history videos like this? Specifically on the F 16 😎
The missile knows where it is at all times.
It knows this because it knows where it isn't, by subtracting where it is, from where it isn't, or where it isn't, from where it is, whichever is greater, it obtains a difference, or deviation.
The guidance sub-system uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is, to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position where it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event of the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has required a variation. The variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too, may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computance scenario works as follows: Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is, however it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subracts where it should be, from where it wasn't, or vice versa. By differentiating this from the algebraic sum og where it shouldn't be, and where it was. It is able to obtain a deviation, and a variation, which is called "air"
Thank you, this is the comment I was looking for lol
Ian McCollum : "Today on Forgotten Weapons we have Growling Sidewinder, he's going to introduce us to one of the favorite weapon systems for fighter pilots to hate on, the Aim Seven Radar guided missile."
GS "Thanks for having me Ian. The Aim Seven Sparrow, shared none of the pin point accuracy of that little feathered hunter we see in the wild, the aerial acrobat it was named after, plucking insects out of the air with stunning precision... this thing is more like a near sighted seagull that notices nothing smaller than a garbage barge... illuminated by a search light. Let's examine why for a moment..."
Very well organized and put together.
More of this content PLEASE!!! There, I asked nicely.
6:11 assram... lol
those sparrows on the F-16s gear doors are awesome lol
6:11 Subtitles: "ass Ram" XD
Love these documentary-type videos!! Great stuff, would love more.
I think the only 2 better medium-range missiles are PL-15 and Meteor
Damn I like these types of videos. You explain fighter jet tech really well with your own background knowledge
Damn love this kind of video from you. Honestly your voice has some soothing quality to it, optimal especially when doing a short documentary about things that go pssssshhh BOOOM
Gotta love that dam ol ASRAAM... it loves flying up the tailpipe!
Love the vids man, keep up the great work
I think this just became a channel about air combat, and I'm here for it
No. The MDBA Meteor is, hands down.
Raise your hand if you’ve been tested in combat
@@Aaron-wq3jz I don't have to taste a pint of Tim Taylors Landlord to know it's going to be bloody good. You just know it is. Same with Meteor.
@@MrHistorian123 And what if in its first actual combat use we manage to find out the AMRAAM is better? Many faces have had egg on it over weapons that were better on paper.
@@ChucksSEADnDEAD Please tell me HOW the AMRAAM will possibly be better. Given that the Meteor outperforms it in every single respect, I think that's highly unlikely.
And Meteor has been tested and performed to spec in every scenario.
One word: Meteor.
Thank you, Professor Sidewinder!
Nicely done. Should of mentioned the unofficial name "Slammer", too. We don't know much about the AIM-260 yet, so naming the AIM-120 the 'best' is a bit difficult. 'Most Proven', 'Most Effective' (ie having an effect)? Certainly.
Best in terms of what? It most certainly beats the trial missiles in terms of availability. Also, while something is in trial, I would refrain it from comparing it with anything, or even qualifying it as a weapon. These are experiments, and usually have tons of unresolved issues (see Mk.14 torpedo for reference).
@@balazsfoldes4700 AIM-260 was _supposed_ to have an IOC of 2022, so it's probably well past trials by now. And yes, new weapons are almost always plagued with teething issues. We really can't say much more, though if it's supposed to replace the Slammer I would say it is to the AMRAAM what the AMRAAM was to the Sparrow. Time will tell.
*should've
are we still doing this "should of" thing? this is so 20-teens...
@@ichanmich Sorry, didn't get that grammatical memo.
These mini documentaries are good.
If the AIM-260 isn't already in production, it will be very soon.
This is such a cool concept! When watching DCS content, it can be kind of overwhelming all the different weapon info. Thanks for the good info!
Great video. I remember an old sceen were you flew the FA18 against a Tomcat with Phoenix. Scary as h.
Interesting place where you can put your missiles on the F-16 (2:00)
I love this new way your videos are! I like how it’s very informative and a bunch of videos and pictures to watch. You are very good at making videos like this as I was paying attention the whole time 😂
Your Videos are amazing. Been following you for a year and your stuff just keeps getting better!! Keep it up!
I really like these short video essays. keep up the good work.
As surprise for me I'm one of the loaders on the F22 video, good work all true.
No, AIM stands for Air Intercept Missile. Which is why the Sidewinder is the AIM-9 and the Sparrow is the AIM-7.
Python 5, thrust vectoring and more manuevering points that any other missile out something like 18 or 24, and speeds up upon impact i dont think any other missile speeds up upon impact. If what ive seen on them is true, those things will reacquire if it misses. Pretty sure you had a video on one no ?
Loved this video buddy. Keep them coming.
Best air to air missile in the universe is my moms slipper
You mean 'Surface to Surface', bro😂🤣🤣
Hey GS I’d love to see a video where a jet like the F35 can shine, it’s obviously not strongest as a solo dog fighter but is really good in conjunction with other aircraft, could we see a video series where a given jet is set up for the most success, the mission plays to the strengths of the jet?
The offset videos are neat where a jet performs where it’s doesn’t play to its strengths but I think it would be neat to see a jet shine, is the F/A-18 hornet best as a dog fighter or more as a strike/attack aircraft; the A10 close air support videos are grey cuz we get to see what the A10 is built for
I love this style of educational video. It does well on its own, or as an intro to an engagement. Thanks for the awesome content!
I didn't know you did documentaries. Good show.
Missiles are like melee weapons and the aircraft; the weilder. Compared to other melee weapons, the AMRAAM may be outranged or less lethal, but in the hands of an F-22 or F-35, it's still going to be an incredible weapon.
I really like these informational format videos.
Please keep doing documentary style videos. They’re a real treat.
Hearing the obvious audio cut after ASRAAM just makes it funnier 🤣
i like how you have such varied content. i prefer the dcs and other flight sim but videos like this are really top notch and i hope you continue to make this type of content
The "AssRam". You did that shit on purpose. I wasn't ready.
we need more educational content like this
I love using this missile in dcs it smashes everything in its way.
excellent video, I love these "explain one interesting thing in enough detail, but not in a 35 minute video" type of clips. moar!
Thanks for posting these types of videos. These are very informative and entertaining. Very cool!
this was well put together my guy. well done. btw, can we get some player v player wwii dogfights?
Throwing AMRAAM's since 1997 (DID F-22: Air Dominance Fighter on PC), feels like the best :p.
Awesome channel. Love the videos and how you explain things keep it up and keep up the warthog videos!!
Love these nuggets of knowledge style videos...
Oh, make more memes for instagram please . The last few ones (especially the mig 29 and multiple eurofighter one) were absolute gem..
I knew it was the best because when I was kid, it was the missile I wanted alot of in every air combat game
GS: my friend is the red devil in the f-18 vid shooting the missile. I showed him and he’s down to connect
More of these videos GS! Love it!
Just wanted to say I enjoy ur channel and thanks for making these videos!
6:11 That's some devilish psy ops
Cool video. Like the change up
so close to 400k... keep it up!
More videos like this! Love it!!! Thank you!!
Amazing video, pls do more in this style.
Please do these type of videos again, it was awesome
I really like those informative video, I don't think there is any youtuber that does it quite like you do.
What's the best beginner joystick
I LOVE videos like this man, keep it up!
These history videos are great. Really cool stuff
Very well done and ultimately, informative, looking forward to the AIM54.
Meteor enters the chat
Yes could very well be but since is not battle proven AMRAAM take the nr 1 spot for now
@@fqeagles21 The best things are never battle proven
@@fqeagles21 The F-22 could very well be the best fighter in the world, but since it has not been battle proven we'll say the F-15C is better.
@@paurodriguezriera7979 could very well be
@@fqeagles21 but it's not, because we know that it's design is superior
I love these kinds of videos. Your content has come so far my dude!
U r the fucking Godfather of digital avioncs...love your videos
I appreciate you, much love.
I would love to see you make a series of weapons tech videos.... Lots of uncovered material for you.... No one else does it