The HORRIFIC Death Of Kaiser Wilhelm II - The Last Emperor Of Germany

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 авг 2024
  • In June 1941, after spending decades of his life in isolation Kaiser Wilhelm II, a man who is considered the main warmonger who brought the First World War to Europe died in The Netherlands. He was a man who had animosity for many countries across Europe, and he also would live to see the Second World War break out across the continent, however the Nazis who were now in control of Germany would consider what to do with the body of the former emperor. But Kaiser Wilhelm II was the last emperor of Germany, and he was a man who built Germany up to become a great power which resulted in the First World War, but he was a man who was the eldest grandchild of Queen Victoria the British Queen. He would call the shots following the death of Victoria, and dictated for a death mask to be cast of his grandmother’s face against her will. But as mentioned following the First World War he would flee Germany and he lived out the rest of his life in exile. But what is the story of his death?

Комментарии • 221

  • @RamblinRick_
    @RamblinRick_ Год назад +64

    My German language teacher was a child in the Netherlands in the town where the Kaiser lived. As a child, my teacher visited the Kaiser on many occasions. He describe him as a kind man.

    • @CarlosJuarez-eb5gx
      @CarlosJuarez-eb5gx Год назад +3

      So?

    • @nickbrowning3270
      @nickbrowning3270 11 месяцев назад

      @@CarlosJuarez-eb5gxbe quiet fool 🧙‍♂️

    • @oliveoil7642
      @oliveoil7642 9 месяцев назад

      @@CarlosJuarez-eb5gx The ally’s propaganda portrayed him as a war mongering tyrant to fit their narrative. The truth is never allowed to be told by the defeated!

    • @mangot589
      @mangot589 2 дня назад

      I’ve read that he wasn’t a total warmongering jackanapes. I’m not sure what to think about him. Most of the time, I think he was a total POS. But he was surrounded by Blood and Iron ideology growing up, from childhood, sycophants (you’re ALWAYS RIGHT, MY PRINCE!) , the “right to rule however you wish, GOD chose YOU, and in an extremely militaristic world at that sad time in history. Idk. If that’s all you’re taught, what else do you know? Loved his nan. Hated his mother. Criticized both. Loved both. , Especially when you’re a young man who has been taught from childhood You’re THE MAN? I’m not even going to excuse all the birth and small arm stuff. That’s crap. After all HE, and nobody else lost his crown for him, it seems he was perfectly pleasant, like OP said. I don’t know that much about him, so if somebody wants to recommend a good BALANCED book, I’d be glad to hear about it! Thanks!

  • @gerardjagroo
    @gerardjagroo Год назад +97

    You're getting worse with the clickbait. He just died of illness for heaven's sake!!! 😡 😡😡😡

  • @pauldiamond9219
    @pauldiamond9219 Год назад +49

    Um, how exactly does dying in ones sleep count as "horrific"...unless you are a Viking or a Klingon?

    • @mr.vargas5648
      @mr.vargas5648 Год назад +6

      Yep that's clickbait right there he died like most of will by age.

  • @nancydubusky1296
    @nancydubusky1296 Год назад +46

    Why is every biography of anyone on the internet entitled the "Horrific death?" We all die of something no matter how famous we are.

    • @paulcorrigan3753
      @paulcorrigan3753 Год назад +10

      You're correct.
      It is overblown - the adjectives such as 'horrific', 'brutal', 'vicious' - and each use demands an explanation.
      Why was a death 'horrific'? What was 'brutal' about it.
      All it really means is that the video's maker is an amateur.

    • @harridan.
      @harridan. Год назад

      The Unfairly Peaceful Death of Wilhelm ll who deserved to have been hanged for war crimes would have been more apt.

    • @laurentdevaux5617
      @laurentdevaux5617 Год назад +5

      True. And about Wilhelm II, he didn't had an horrific dead at all, he died quite peacefully at 82, though in exile

    • @francissmith213
      @francissmith213 Год назад +5

      We all die of the same thing … a lack of breath 😂

    • @michaelwhisman
      @michaelwhisman Год назад +5

      @@paulcorrigan3753 I was taught, in military intelligence, that you could identify a lie by the numbers of adjectives and adverbs.

  • @jackyanderson9330
    @jackyanderson9330 11 месяцев назад +5

    He was a real hero. He was defending his land and his people. There is an old adage that whom much is given, much is expected. He was an Emperor and he never wanted his country or his people to be subject to any foreign rule. No head of a family will want any member of his to be subject to another person or people outside the family anyway.
    He never wanted that war with Great Britain to the best of my knowledge. Afterrall he has British blood.
    But much was given to him to be the defender of his land and his people. So he wasn't a Dictator. He was the father of the land and no father will want /like you to come and mistreat his children for any reason.
    The difference between him and his cousin the King of Great Britain was a family feud which he never wanted because he has deep love and respect for his Grandmother Queen Victoria and his maternal land Great Britain.
    We who are living in this modern generation should not forget that the Anglo Saxon relationship is one of the oldest in the history of man both in language and culture. Let's eschew our differences in the past and work for a better tomorrow. I love that.

  • @gjc1
    @gjc1 Год назад +76

    I don’t believe you understand the meaning of “horrific”. You need to flesh out your narrative with more specific information and detail; for example, it was his left arm that was damaged in his blotched birth. He blamed his British mother and her doctor for it.

    • @cbachinger
      @cbachinger 8 месяцев назад +1

      And the author hasn't said a word in 7 months.

  • @MsCharley13
    @MsCharley13 Год назад +47

    Hardly a horrific death

  • @nellymartinez8374
    @nellymartinez8374 Год назад +23

    Kaiser wilhelm II died peacefully at a great age for the era, in his own bedroom at his Huis Doorn manor of his own, he was lucky after abdication to be retired in a simple way of life, when the first world war began he was unable to lead it, this war was ended 4 years after because of his unability to stop it, we can't count the amount of young men in all countries who paid the heavy price of their lost life, most of them are still missing and rare ones are discovered and find by dna for the benefit of their families who can finally buried them.

  • @bigchungus6528
    @bigchungus6528 Год назад +15

    Welcome to Her Horrific History

  • @peterselles590
    @peterselles590 Год назад +26

    so evry death is horrific to you? i quess its all just clickbait,

  • @debraturner4559
    @debraturner4559 10 месяцев назад +6

    Recent biographers who have re-examined the life of Wilhelm II do not consider him a warmonger. That turned out to be the British propaganda at the time of WWI. In fact, Wilhelm II spent many of his summers in Great Britain and loved his grandmother, Queen Victoria and the UK. He worked very hard at diplomacy to keep WWI from starting. His generals did want the war. Also although Wilhelm II wrote diplomatic letters to Hitler who was then the leader of Germany, he was never fooled by the Nazis and always intensely disliked and mistrusted the Nazis Party.

  • @richardshiggins704
    @richardshiggins704 Год назад +10

    Drop the "Horrific" title . To die in your 80s is definitely NOT horrific .

  • @aquarius044
    @aquarius044 Год назад +7

    HORRIFIC?????? OK, my father, who died of lung cancer REALLY had a horrific death, in this case.

  • @roystone9932
    @roystone9932 Год назад +16

    HORRIFIC !!!!, i don't think so . His cousin Tzar Nicholas had an horrific death along with his wife and children . Wilhelm II was a vain and petulant man but managed to escape the same end as his cousin by fleeing Germany ..........with trainloads of treasure .

    • @sp4c3g
      @sp4c3g Год назад +2

      he was lucky indeed! his cousin nicholas ii and family paid for all his european relatives

    • @romanheart8997
      @romanheart8997 Год назад

      The Germans are far more Civilized than the filthy inbred Russians("Soviets").....the German People would have allowed the Kaiser to "Retire quietly" on a Prussian Estate. Even Hitler thought the "Kaiser" was No risk to his new Germany. The Prussian Aristocracy(most of the General Staff).... were still viewed as the Natural Upper class.

  • @takashitamagawa5881
    @takashitamagawa5881 Год назад +15

    I wouldn't say that he was a warmonger, he certainly wasn't solely responsible for all the death and horror of WWI. Austria-Hungary and Russia bore more direct responsibility for what happened in the summer of 1914. But Germany and Prussia in particular were in the strongest position to stop the war from breaking out and widening. Tragic that his father Frederick III had only a few months on the throne, it seems likely that he would have resisted the more militant elements within the government rather than have Germany embark on an arms buildup and ultimately sign off on the Schlieffen plan to invade France through Belgium. A wiser ruler could have recognized Germany's position in Europe as one of being potentially surrounded by enemies.
    While Bismarck did recognize that sobering reality of Germany's situation and who as Chancellor sought out alliances his foreign policy had the flaw of leaving France totally out in the cold.

    • @scottabc72
      @scottabc72 Год назад +5

      France literally had a policy of 'revenge' (revanche) with the stated goal or retaking Alsace-Lorraine and it was on this basis they secured an alliance with Russia decades before WW1. Britain joined the alliance simply because Germany was building a fleet that approached the size of the British Navy. There was plenty of blame to go around for WW1

    • @takashitamagawa5881
      @takashitamagawa5881 Год назад +1

      @@scottabc72 The relative roles of Germany and France in the outbreak of war in 1914 can certainly be debated. It should be noted that there were those in the Prussian leadership in 1870-1871 who had misgivings about taking Alsace-Lorraine knowing what it could mean for the future.
      Going back to Kaiser Wilhelm II the point I wanted to make is that he can't be held responsible for the outbreak of WWI in the same way that Hitler is held responsible for the outbreak of WWII a quarter century later. The situation in 1914 was far murkier.

    • @scottabc72
      @scottabc72 Год назад +5

      @@takashitamagawa5881 I agree, my position is that WW1 was a systemic failure rather than the leadership of any one state. I think Germany was a little more responsible but only a little.

    • @williamcurtin5692
      @williamcurtin5692 Год назад

      You're leaving out Serbia? But seeing that he could have stopped Austria from pursuing their desired foolishness, he bears the biggest guilt to me. But he was weak and when he was getting cold feet was pulled back in by his generals whining about how stopping the mobilization would screw up the rail traffic over the Rhein bridge at Koln.

    • @ISIO-George
      @ISIO-George Год назад +3

      Not going to write a long post about every country's role. Just going to say there is plenty of blame to go around, and none of the major powers were sinless in trying to prevent the war. One part of events, that is usually not mentioned in the march to war, is that literally at the 11th hour, when it finally sunk in for Germany that Britain would enter the war, Germany desperately tried to get AH to call off it's invasion of Serbia, which was about to begin. It was to no avail.

  • @achantus1
    @achantus1 Год назад +7

    A quite normal death for an old man. How is this HORRIFIC? Click bait title.

  • @Austin8thGenTexan
    @Austin8thGenTexan 7 месяцев назад +1

    Learning of the Kaiser's very comfortable death was so *horrific* that I blew my coffee across the breakfast table! 🤗

  • @ldmx4039
    @ldmx4039 Год назад +2

    He was not the sole person responsible for WW1, i would like to rebuke that the Austrians started the conflict to combat terrorism

  • @paulcorrigan3753
    @paulcorrigan3753 Год назад +6

    I think he was more correctly called German Emperor instead of Emperor of Germany. That was to accommodate the sensitivities of the various kings, dukes, princes and so on of the constituent state of a united Germany.

  • @robleeatheart
    @robleeatheart Год назад +4

    Rather judgemental, although I do understand the author's point of view ... Many historians have considered George V, the Romanovs, the Hapsburgs and the French equally responsible for the horror of WWI, which changed the world irrevocably ...

  • @benedict_323
    @benedict_323 Год назад +14

    He wasn't a warmonger. The Russian Tsar the inept Nicholas II was the warmonger. It was he who mobilised the Russian army on the German border an act of war and refused to pull back. That lit the fuse that caused war to break out in other places. Of course it was the German invasion of Belgium that brought Great Britain into the war. If only his mother and uncle The Kaiserin Friedrich and Edward VII survived it possibly all could have been avoided.

    • @davidlogan4329
      @davidlogan4329 Год назад +1

      Correct. The Russian Tsar was indeed a massive criminal.

    • @Rosiecrossley1
      @Rosiecrossley1 Год назад +1

      Correct the kaiser wrote to Nicholas advising him to change his ways but that was ignored

    • @romanheart8997
      @romanheart8997 Год назад

      Oh YES....So True!....And lets NOT forget the "Frogs"....that were itching to revenge their Losses in the Franco-Prussian war....Or the Brits that were eyeing ALL of Germany's Overseas Territories.

  • @paulbennett4415
    @paulbennett4415 Год назад +12

    In the 1974 TV series 'Fall of Eagles', the actor🎭 Barry Foster portrayed Kaiser Wilhelm II; the likeness is uncanny .

    • @Erik-sw8wm
      @Erik-sw8wm Год назад +1

      Great series highly recommend

    • @2msvalkyrie529
      @2msvalkyrie529 Год назад +1

      Yes.! What a performance !!

    • @michaelsergejhelgesson1637
      @michaelsergejhelgesson1637 11 месяцев назад +1

      How interesting! I have never heard of it before ( I think ),
      but now I will watch it! Thanks!

  • @rog4864
    @rog4864 Месяц назад

    From what I have read, the Kaiser was in no way a warmonger. In fact he had come up with a plan for peace the he had submitted to his cousins King George V of Great Britain and Tsar Nicholis of Russia and from what I read , they both agreed this plan could work and keep peace. But the ministers or cabinet officials of all three Monarchs defied their orders to not mobilize and so the Kaiser was forced to mobilize his troops as well. To call this man a villain for all time is a real injustice to him and his family.

  • @susanc4622
    @susanc4622 Год назад +14

    I’ve always thought that Bismarck was the real power in Germany up to the 1880’s. Bismarck used force to unite Germany but a also introduced much social reform. Perhaps, they wouldn’t have had WW1 if Wilhelm had listened to Bismarck. To start a war was not declared illegal until the founding of the League of Nations so no matter how bitter everyone was, the Kaiser and his generals could not have been declared criminals for starting a war. How do you think the English Empire was founded? Even though starting a war is now illegal, instigators of war are rarely punished.

    • @Erik-sw8wm
      @Erik-sw8wm Год назад

      The whole narrative that the Kaiser was responsible for World War I is pure and utter bullshit.

    • @Erik-sw8wm
      @Erik-sw8wm Год назад

      Not sure what Bismarck has to do with anything? He died in 1898.

    • @Piepsiify
      @Piepsiify Год назад +2

      Germany was united in 1871 after a war against France wich was started by France to a trick of Bismarck (Emser Depesche). Bismarck was some kind of political architect for a unitied Germany. He implemented a system of peace treaties with other countries to make a war very unlikely because that war might have escalated quickly.
      Later Austria-Hungary declared war against Serbia (Franz Ferdinand assasination), Russia declared war against Austria-Hungary, because of that Germany declared war against Russia and so on…

    • @evancoker194
      @evancoker194 10 месяцев назад +1

      Bismarck built modern Germany. The old Kaiser and Bismarck stood behind each other respectively. They knew what they were doing. Wilhelm II had a complex because he was a crippled king, mad at the whole damned world. He lived to threaten and use his huge Army, and he finally did. In the works forever. His mouth shattered nerves everywhere.

    • @evancoker194
      @evancoker194 10 месяцев назад

      @@Erik-sw8wm Bismarck always said " Keep friends with Russia." Wilhelm started out disagreeing with, and then firing Bismarck. And walked away from Bismarcks' " Drei Kaiser Bund." Later Wilhelm tried to fix it back with his cousin the Czar, but the Russians turned a deaf ear.

  • @wernerwirsching2058
    @wernerwirsching2058 Месяц назад

    The Emperor wasn't responsible for the outbreak of WW1 !!! Germany was allied with Austria-Hungaria, and when Russia was proclaiming the war to Austria , he had to do his duty.

  • @M-I-k-e1301
    @M-I-k-e1301 10 месяцев назад +1

    I don’t get why people don’t hold Russia at least somewhat responsible for ww1. Yea Austria-hungry attacked Serbia but russia was the first major power to mobilize its troops and Germany had no choice but to respond (mobilize )or face not being able to be ready in time to stop Russian army from sweeping eastern Germany

  • @MarciaWilson-hq9ii
    @MarciaWilson-hq9ii 8 месяцев назад +2

    He died peacefully of old age hardly a horrific death more exaggerated nonsense

  • @BELCAN57
    @BELCAN57 Год назад +2

    Read some history books. There were various and sundry reasons for The Great War. The Austro-Hungarians, Russians, Serbians and French had a little something to do with it.

  • @sanderdeboer6034
    @sanderdeboer6034 Год назад +1

    This video is a bit too one sided in my opinion, and while I agree that Germany played a pivotal part in the start of WW1, and the Kaiser was a war monger who didn’t want to show ‘weakness’, both Germany and the Kaiser can’t be blamed for the total outcome of WW1.
    Most historians agree that when taking in all the facts and circumstances all powers involved bare responsibility for the prolonged war and its many casualties. The reason why the Kaiser played the role he did, has to do with a complex of factors. Like his very HARSH upbringing and ‘treatments’ to correct his arm, which was non functioning because of a problem at birth.
    The fact all royals in Europe are connected to each other and basically one family, also played a part in this. Wilhelm was very fond of Queen victory and the UK as a country. Which he frequently visited, however he had a love hate relationship with England when it came to other relatives and the UK as a whole.
    He also grew up in a time where having a handicap was seen as a big problem, which caused him both psychical and mental suffering. Plus being a military focused person was ingrained in him from a very early age. In front of the palace he grew up in, there was a miniature fortress with actual working miniatures canons.
    You have to see his actions within the context of his time and circumstances, but to be fair, he was a vulnerable narcissist with annoying threats. One of the things I can still remember from visiting Huis Doorn here in the Netherlands is the eating arrangement. People could only start eating when the Kaiser started, and had to finish if he finished. Meaning that often people hardly eat at all, and were still hungry after leaving the dinner table.
    He also loved to chop wood, and probably chopped down most trees around Huis Doorn. But he did donate the wood to surrounding villages so people could be warn in winter. A very complex and difficult character to judge, however I do understand the hostility towards him. I am against the death penalty myself, but given the fact thousands were shot during WW1 for often not even doing anything wrong, he deserved it much more then them.

  • @royledbetter2050
    @royledbetter2050 Год назад +1

    This poor narrator stumbles reading the simplest words. It really is pitiable. Most unfortunate.

  • @davidmondello6504
    @davidmondello6504 Год назад +6

    Hardly a horrific death.

  • @naturalobserver1322
    @naturalobserver1322 Год назад +5

    Always love how the British can always find fault with everyone but themselves.

    • @richardkeilig4062
      @richardkeilig4062 9 месяцев назад

      The naval blockade by the UK and later with the USA caused millions of deaths by starvation and lasted till the summer of 2019. It was not right.

  • @17461771
    @17461771 5 месяцев назад

    As a Swede, my life would be complete if Germany would crown His great grandson. Gud bevare Konungen!

  • @davidlogan4329
    @davidlogan4329 Год назад +1

    Wilhelm II was German Kaiser. He was never ever Kaiser of Germany. That title never existed. His father was Friedrich III and never Frederick.

  • @JonathanBresnihan77
    @JonathanBresnihan77 День назад

    This title is conpletely misleading. He did NOT die "horrifically." In fact, he got to live out his final years in a labish country mansion in the Netherlands with his family.

  • @sorenaleksander2670
    @sorenaleksander2670 Год назад +3

    Is this AI generated or just terribly written?

  • @powhatan1165
    @powhatan1165 11 месяцев назад

    pointing the finger of blame at Wilhelm II is pure BS, all of Europe including Great Britain was equal in guilt for letting events spiral into a World War

  • @theironknight597
    @theironknight597 Год назад +1

    Good deal of bias in this video, history is written by the winners. He died from a pulmonary embolism.

  • @othmanbengrich
    @othmanbengrich 9 месяцев назад

    Is it based on the fact that Austria and Germany did not suffer from love troubles, and that France, Britain and Russia were innocent of the conflict and had no hand in it? Enough falsifying history, while the Tsar was spending his vacation after the assassination of the Archduke of Austria.The President of France was making a support visit to Britain and Russia and expanding the scope of the crisis (during July, which is a holiday).

  • @Eazy-ERyder
    @Eazy-ERyder 11 месяцев назад

    "Horrific?" Wth?? That's ridiculously misleading. The man lived out his golden years comfortably in a MANSION in the Netherlands. He also was offered several opportunities for asylum, like in Britain when Churchill reached out to him at the offset of WW2.

  • @empressrohroh
    @empressrohroh Год назад +8

    sorry too much pontificating in lieu of just history.

  • @CharlieEverton-mv7yq
    @CharlieEverton-mv7yq 8 месяцев назад +1

    suggest he was not a warmonger a creature of his time who rightly or wronglybelie .

  • @henkhemming6674
    @henkhemming6674 Год назад +1

    Baroness Ella van Heemstra (1900-1984), the mother of actress AUDREY HEPBURN, sold "Huis Doorn" to the Kaiser..true fact.

  • @richardshiggins704
    @richardshiggins704 Год назад +2

    Don't forget my horrific death !!

  • @ernestchacon4928
    @ernestchacon4928 Год назад +1

    Queen Victoria's grandchildren were all very beautiful and handsome ppl.

  • @irene3196
    @irene3196 Год назад

    My grandmother had a photograph of the Kaiser hanging behind her toilet.

  • @rosesprog1722
    @rosesprog1722 8 месяцев назад

    He he, the true story is the exact opposite of what is being claimed here, so typically British, nation before truth.

  • @richardkeilig4062
    @richardkeilig4062 9 месяцев назад

    Why he so cruel? I am not sure. The Austrian government made massive mistakes. Also, William's chief minister did not follow directives from the Kaiser. The Czar of Russia mobilized his army when they should not have. I believe he was a good man, and did not want war.

  • @glass2467
    @glass2467 Год назад +2

    HORRIFIC is only click bate here, and probably in most of your videos. Just another contributor to a flood of BS in today's world. Not that his death was easy. That being said, the video is good.

  • @TheOmegaman1911
    @TheOmegaman1911 8 месяцев назад

    Sorry , but The Kaiser wasn't buried .....His coffin has rested on a Dias for the past 82 years in the mausoleum .

  • @svenerikjohansson8130
    @svenerikjohansson8130 7 месяцев назад

    It is true he was considered a war monger by the western powers, but the first fighting in WW1 was, if I´m correct, between Austria and Serbia, after the assacination of the Austrian crown prince Franz Ferdinand. Austria was allied to Germany, and Serbia was allied to Russia, and Russia to France which led to a much larger war, so the situation was much more complex than it was in 1939, when first Germany, and then the Soviet Union, invaded Poland, followed after 2 days by Brittish and French declarations of war against Germany.

  • @cyndiroberts5922
    @cyndiroberts5922 Год назад +29

    I am glad Victoria wasn't alive to see what her in laws did after her passing.

    • @c.w.8200
      @c.w.8200 Год назад +7

      As if whatever the British were doing wasn't horrific enough at any point in the last few hundred years.

    • @janegardener1662
      @janegardener1662 Год назад +12

      Wilhelm was her grandson.

    • @jenniferhanson8136
      @jenniferhanson8136 Год назад +1

      Victoria wasn't German

    • @SputnikDeb
      @SputnikDeb Год назад +7

      @@jenniferhanson8136 But Victoria was Kaiser Wilhelm's grandmother.

    • @H1GH.FL1Y3R
      @H1GH.FL1Y3R Год назад +2

      ​@C. W. Every country has a past. There has been lots of empire builder throughout the years. Can you point out one time the British committed genocide? I'm open to education if you are able.

  • @user-ci7we9of6p
    @user-ci7we9of6p 2 месяца назад

    that story doesn't make sense, kings dont do that

  • @user-vu6lq7yk1n
    @user-vu6lq7yk1n 6 дней назад

    So the "horrific" part is nobhis death but rather how he was able to live comfortably while in exile? Not so much a horrible death. He died of old age. Misleading title on this video.

  • @rodneymarsden3003
    @rodneymarsden3003 Год назад +1

    Wilhelm the 1st with Bismarck did a lot more for the German people than Wilhelm the 2nd.

  • @julietcunningham852
    @julietcunningham852 Год назад +2

    Some cities in America also have lists of World War One dead. There is one near me in Boston.

  • @jrossofskb
    @jrossofskb Год назад +6

    What birth defect did he try to hide? I didn't understand what you said.

    • @maryellencook9528
      @maryellencook9528 Год назад +4

      He probably had a form of Bell's Palsy, or a similar neurological injury. It's not unusual for an infant born of a difficult delivery will suffer a fractured clavicle. Sometimes this will damage the nerves up near the clavicle and neck region. It can lead to complete or partial paralysis of the effected limb.

    • @rolandcharriez7631
      @rolandcharriez7631 Год назад +10

      He had a withered arm. I think it was due to his birth when during that time. Because of the difficult labor with his mom, the doctors would have extracted the child with forceps; he was injured during that time. You can see which arm was aflicted in photos; he alway had the withered arm tucked away or hidden in photos.

    • @georgeadamsii7777
      @georgeadamsii7777 Год назад +5

      Erbs Palsy, it shortened his left arm. He had nerve damage at the left shoulder and debilitating ear infections for his entire life.

    • @jrossofskb
      @jrossofskb Год назад +2

      Thank you all for explaining!

    • @peterselles590
      @peterselles590 Год назад +3

      Congenital Limb Defect (arm)

  • @dorienberteletti2129
    @dorienberteletti2129 Год назад +1

    The commentator needs to get another job!

  • @lianefehrle9921
    @lianefehrle9921 Год назад +4

    Thank you for talking about him. I have seen his castle and it is absolutely huge. Some of his castle has stores inside of it.

    • @davidlogan4329
      @davidlogan4329 Год назад

      Huis Doorn is not huge. It is a Dutch manor house. His palaces in Germany were large.

    • @lianefehrle9921
      @lianefehrle9921 Год назад +1

      @@davidlogan4329 that is what I was talking about. His castle 🏰 in Germany

  • @TheOmegaman1911
    @TheOmegaman1911 8 месяцев назад +1

    Horrific? My Arse ......

  • @lesliearadi3747
    @lesliearadi3747 Год назад +1

    Poorly narrated

  • @viljamilindnvall
    @viljamilindnvall 10 месяцев назад

    its funny that adolf blames germanys loss to wilhelm II but yeat he also loss the war

  • @judithmitchell4667
    @judithmitchell4667 9 месяцев назад +1

    "Horrific"? Click Bait!

  • @wimweender1306
    @wimweender1306 Год назад +1

    Wilhelm 😊❤

  • @jenniferhanson8136
    @jenniferhanson8136 Год назад +6

    Queen Victoria in the royal family in England were related to the royal family of Russia

    • @kfemme68
      @kfemme68 Год назад +3

      Queen Victoria married her children into all or most of the royal families in Europe. Some say it's the reason that the Romanov's had the downfall when they did because she also passed her hemophilia on to many of them also.
      Victoria passed her hemophilia to her daughter Alice who then passed it down to her daughter, Alix (who became Alexandra Feodorovna) who then passed it to her only son. Alexei (the heir to Tsar Nicholas II) was born with it and Alexandra would try anything to cure it thus how Rasputin wormed his way into the palace. He took advantage of a desperate mother who would do anything, pay anything for her son to be cured so she couldn't be blamed for having an heir that probably wouldn't survive to take his place after his father.
      WWI (probably had the most to do with it and that you can lay at the feet of her cousin Kaiser Wilhelm) and Alexandra's German heritage had a little more to do with their downfall than Rasputin and the hemophilia but it all played a part.
      A little more history on how many of the royal houses of Europe are tied together through marriages of Victoria and Albert's children. 🙅🏼‍♀️🤷🏼‍♀️🤦🏼‍♀️🤣

    • @GaelinW
      @GaelinW Год назад +2

      Queen Victoria is literally referred to as the "Grandmother of Europe."

  • @csomanathchakrapani7521
    @csomanathchakrapani7521 6 месяцев назад +1

    One-sided durt

  • @patricia8888
    @patricia8888 Год назад +6

    What a great content. Greetings from Brazil 😀

  • @angloturbo7137
    @angloturbo7137 Год назад +3

    Serbia fired the first shots on some dude in his car.
    Serbia is to blame simple as.
    Kaiser did nothing diffrent from britain and similar ambitions ect.😂

  • @JL-XrtaMayoNoCheese
    @JL-XrtaMayoNoCheese 8 месяцев назад

    Why are you slandering the Kaiser? The Milner group started the war, not the Kaiser

  • @peterthayer4967
    @peterthayer4967 11 месяцев назад +1

    Poorly researched and hateful anti-Wilhelm diatribe
    I could supply many facts but what's the use.

  • @chrismccartney8668
    @chrismccartney8668 Год назад +1

    Stunted narrative

  • @keithbessant
    @keithbessant 11 месяцев назад

    Didn't the US enter the war in 1917?

  • @Erik-sw8wm
    @Erik-sw8wm Год назад

    Thank you for the great photos! However, your commentary is subject to debate! Obviously, your mind has been conditioned to think one way

  • @billdurham8477
    @billdurham8477 Год назад

    Fascinating, thank you. "It'll start over some damn silly thing in the Balkans" opined he about WW1

  • @lawrenceyoung72
    @lawrenceyoung72 14 дней назад

    Handsome man

  • @waynegray5568
    @waynegray5568 Год назад +6

    Learn your subject matter! Wilhelm had a withered arm because Queen Victoria insisted on a British doctor at his birth who screwed up! This in part, led to Wilhelm's resentment of the UK.

    • @davidlogan4329
      @davidlogan4329 Год назад +4

      Wilhelm II had a non-functioning shorter arm due to the fact that he was violently pulled from his mother's womb. He was a breech birth. The alternative was the death of both mother and baby. The Doctor saved both lives.

  • @lenculpepper9150
    @lenculpepper9150 10 месяцев назад

    One could only hope to die in such a "horrific" manner.

  • @Krusador42
    @Krusador42 10 месяцев назад

    I believe that the video is historically incorrect in many parts.

  • @Paula-Galgo
    @Paula-Galgo 5 месяцев назад +1

    Horrific?

  • @yasmeen531
    @yasmeen531 10 месяцев назад

    As usual British biases come out even in documentaries.

  • @shawnastephens1536
    @shawnastephens1536 7 месяцев назад +1

    He seemed like a hateful person. I don't understand why he hated his British family so much. Family fighting family very sad😢.

  • @TravelingThruLife
    @TravelingThruLife Год назад

    Talk about click bait title

  • @neiljosephbennett9119
    @neiljosephbennett9119 Месяц назад

    Stupid clickbait ...... the title alone is a warning to avoid this crap.

  • @michaelwhisman
    @michaelwhisman Год назад

    The Americans entered the war in 1917. Duh!!!

  • @derrickstorm6976
    @derrickstorm6976 2 месяца назад

    My God this was an off-topic ramble, and like written by a high schooler

  • @bluefalco8784
    @bluefalco8784 Год назад +1

    schestzwich hollstein lol

    • @LB-gz3ke
      @LB-gz3ke Год назад

      I enjoyed mention of the Flying Arches. I pictures McDonald's signs flying overhead!

  • @amakl755
    @amakl755 8 месяцев назад

    Wow!! IDK wt part of horrific do u mean btw king George V was also responsible for WW1 + Tsar of Russia + Raymond poincare of France all those should be charged for war crimes

  • @andersrahbek7666
    @andersrahbek7666 Год назад +2

    Thank you so very much for this inspiring history lesson!

  • @ajkleipass
    @ajkleipass Год назад +1

    If you'll pardon the tangent, during the last years of his life, did Wilhelm have any contact with his cousin Edward VIII / the Duke of Windsor? They both seemed to look to Hitler as a means to restoring themselves to their respective thrones.

    • @palastofhistory4026
      @palastofhistory4026 Год назад +1

      No Kaiser wilhelm II didn't have any contact with Edward VIII
      Also Edward never wanted to regain his throne

  • @Angelfeather100
    @Angelfeather100 Год назад

    HORRIFIC?!!!!

  • @patbowman6723
    @patbowman6723 Год назад

    Another informative and interesting video. thanks very much.

  • @chrisjarvis4449
    @chrisjarvis4449 Год назад

    the die of wilhelm was cast at his birth when that Scottish doctor that delivered him botched the whole thing by over drugging wilhelms mother and her poor baby was made a cripple by that quack of a dr. . so yes he had a great dislike of any thing English .

    • @kevinsargeant9171
      @kevinsargeant9171 Год назад

      Queen Victoria sent 2 bottles of Laudanum ( opium water) to the Kaiser’s mother to reduce the pain of childbirth . Her physician hadn’t used it before and accidentally overdosed her during the birth - sedating both mother and baby which necessitated the use of forceps in the delivery which caused the deformity to neck and left shoulder - injuries that had grave consequences for a whole Generation.....

  • @nancyseman2719
    @nancyseman2719 Год назад +3

    To bad it wasn't a horrific death. If anyone deserved it, it was him.

  • @natuna23
    @natuna23 Год назад

    dislike button.

  • @Booka60
    @Booka60 Год назад

    Huis Doorn is like a time-capsule for the Imperial way of life he led. That it is stained with so much blood, came to mind when looking at his dinner services. There was in his private study, a exquisite little photo of the murdered Tsarvich Alexis of Russia, proudly displayed, touchingly sweet. Then to think that he created all of that nightmare. His bedroom featured a garishly elaborate, huge, fold out lavatory. Yes, the Kaiser's sh*tter! Everything else was very prim and overly decorated, with very fine but useless things of vanity and saccharine sentiment. He spent his time cutting down trees, and was known as the 'Logger of Doorn'. He wiped out untold acres of woodland, with huge piles of wood neatly stacked...sort of like bodies in piles. His tomb is just off from the manor, and you can just see through the barred stained glass the outline of his red coffin, strewn with ancient dead wreaths. It is a beautiful place.

  • @CarlosJuarez-eb5gx
    @CarlosJuarez-eb5gx Год назад +1

    Guys, in your feed, use the video options and select "Do not recommend channel"

  • @nyckolaus
    @nyckolaus Год назад +7

    He was a beast.

    • @meeeka
      @meeeka Год назад

      He was a narcissistic baby idiot.

    • @zzzbbbooo
      @zzzbbbooo 10 месяцев назад +1

      He was not actually. He was proud and pompous but he was not an evil man.

  • @shirleyhowley4721
    @shirleyhowley4721 Год назад +1

    What an arrogant monster ! Queen Victoria said he was an unpleasant child with a temper although he wanted her to love him !

  • @mito88
    @mito88 Год назад +3

    warmonger...

  • @kerraptregolls4929
    @kerraptregolls4929 Год назад

    He was left…..