I think you should test more games with minimum/recommended requirements for each game as just as you did with Minecraft. It would be much more interesting to watch
@@zWORMzGaming 2nd market might be different where you live, but where I do it's totally possible. Because in store gpus are expensive and we have good & secure 2nd online market sites, gpus are really popular especially since the mining boom there. So one can buy & sell gpus without losing anything on the purchase at all (even gain on it)
For Minecraft at 60fps; A 2nd gen I3 and it's Integrated graphics or Core 2 duo with a Gt 240 or HD 5570/6450 For Minecraft at 200fps a !5 or Ryzen 5 from the 2000 or 6th gen For Minecraft at 1000fps A I7 or Ryzen 7 from ryzen 3000 or 9th gen For minecraft with shaders Gtx 1060 Rx 590/5600xt (Because AMD does worse with Open Gl) Minecraft with Seus PTGI for 4k RTX 3080 (Does Seus even work well on AMD at all?) I5 12600k or Ryzen 7 5700x
Thanks zwormz for testing this one out, I hope warzone 2.0 does not go as bad with future updates like the previous one did, i wonder do they really iron out the problems or make it worse.
@@lnfinyx while it’s true it’s not optimized that well it is a better game graphically which takes more power from the cpu and gpu even at lower settings
@@marcowulliampopirers2216 well, you have to decide what the minimum acceptable experience is for most people. Is 480p/30 acceptable? Probably not for most people. It's not like a real minimum is a thing, since you could always lower resolution more, or put up with a lower frame rate.
720p 30 fps is mostly an enjoyable experience and can be taken as minimum. although for competitive games, i agree, definitely the aim should be a stable 60 and recommended should be 1440p with 144 stable fps
Anywhere from 232 to 140 fps. Bit of a mess ruclips.net/video/4xoGUhHI7nA/видео.html | Call of Duty : Warzone 2.0 | 1080p | LOW SETTINGS | i7-9700K | RTX 3060 TI | 32 GB 3600Mhz RAM
Nice benchmark as always bro, btw 12:45 you should have put that face in the thumbnail lol And another thing, with my ryzen 5 3600 i suffered a lot of performance issues in this one un particular and and found a fix using the ryzen master just to increase a little bit the frequency and it went smoother after that, maybe the same it can be done with intel to improve the performance by a little with the recommended requeriments, cause im pretty sure the 1060 6gb is capable of way more fps in cod games
no bro it's your GPU... wierdly... 1060 6gb is a Fire card, but only in the reliability department. Not the speed department. I have R5 3600 and GTX 970 (both OC'ed to the moon on Ryzen Master/Afterburner) Still can't hit 60+ consistently in mw2/warzone etc - it's like 45-65 depending on where you are and what's going on. also your actual internet connection makes a big difference in your games smoothness. MW2 Crashes every 3rd or 4th warzone game. This shithouse game has got me wanting to just get like a 2060 Super and call it done Real niggas DON'T NEED to GIVE NVIDIA their 3090/4090 money. Definitely gonna get a 2060S or some similarly priced RX card....
My pc does just fine on wz2, I got a rx560 i5-4590 and 16gb ram, I don't play a one of the presets but I am using fsr on balanced and my settings are pretty balanced as well. it does really fucing good in the regular game as well
I was using a i7 3770(oc) and a Rx 580 and got around 60 to 90 fps 1440p mixed settings with fsr quality. I think you should get more fps using i7 4770k but the video says otherwise.
I have a 3060 ti and a i5-10400f and no matter the settings I can't get a stable 100 fps with constant drops into the 60-70s. Its basically unplayable for me Idk how you get that much FPS on 1440p with that hardware.
@@ZayoFPS Recently I got a laptop with RTX 3060 . In warzone 2 I get 90 to 130 (Avg.112) at mixed settings with dlss quality. Something might be wrong with your settings selection for you to get this low fps or you could prefer visuals that's totally fine too.
@@munifkhan5724 I've tried every single setting possible. Literally everything on low to everything on high same problem. It appears to be a CPU bottleneck so I just gave up. I may try again soon to see if they optimized anything. What CPU do you have?
CPU usage is extremely high in this game, I have a 6700xt and 5600x, and at times I'm only using around 50% of my GPU at 1080p, hope they find a way to reduce CPU load
Then try to increase load on your gpu by for example.. increasing resolution scale to 120% or so. And also try to cap your fps to lower rates, between 60-90 fps. These 2 things wil 100% help
@@tanmay_6363 I don't believe it is from my experience. Ti, short for Titanium, is their way of getting around the card SKUs that end in 5 in my opinion. It gives them and extra model between two models.
I had a 10th gen i3 8 GBs for 2400 Mhz of RAM and a RTX 3060 TI and the game played like shit at lowest settings and with texture streaming turned off and it was like a slideshow lmao and when I installed 8 more GBs of RAM it ran like a champ at medium settings so idk wtf is going on with this game also resize bar was on both times
There are still bottlenecks with modern GPUs if you pair them with something that's less powerful than a 12gen intel or 5000 series amd CPU, because it's very CPU intensive, even the i7 4770 should do a good job at handling the 1060 in most games however it's not the case here. At this point you just rather crank up the settings so your GPU utilization goes up without significant hit on performance, why they even recommend you to use NIS if the performance gain is 0, just disable NIS or keep it and increase the settings.
I don’t know about intel but my 3700x has no issues playing this game above 100fps which turns into a gpu bottleneck . The 3000 series are still very capable but in a few years I’ll probably change my mind
@@rage2387 i just bought the 5600g brand new for 100 dlls here in Mexico, so i should be good as far as the processor not bottlenecking right? I plan on running a rx6600 or a rx5700xt whatever’s available
you guys know a lot more then me, can i get your opinions on my laptop? im running a rtx 3080 ryzen 7 5800hs 16gb ram but im struggling a lot with fps, theyre all over the place between 75 to 95, and im trying any setting possible but i really dont know
Kryyyyyyzzp! I would love to see a video from you testing different settings in this game to show what your findings are for the most optimized settings. I’m currently running a 3070 and a 5900x, but just purchased a 3080ti in hopes to finally get 144fps average at 1440p w quality DLSS. I know you don’t normally do settings videos, but a lot of people trust your testing over other RUclipsrs. Just an idea, thanks!
I have a 12700K and 3080, and with DLSS Quality at 1440p I am getting 150fps average on the Extreme preset. Without DLSS I have to go down to balanced to get 144fps
@@dilaraeira6813 Yip, even at 1080p. You might get some games that have a bit of a CPU bottleneck at 1080p, but for the most part it will be great. Had that exact same combo
I'm more surprised how the RX 580 is still holding up quite fine to this day the fact i still have that card for almost 4 years by now and still being used to this day. Altough, wishing for a new and better card by the end of this year maybe.
Have you set the Game's RenderWorkerCount to "4" for the i7 4770k, because by default it's set to "2" and it helps alleviating the bottleneck by utilizing more threads thus pushing gpu usage past 80% and gaining about 10fps or more on average
It's running on 4 at least, the 4770K was above 50% utilized and the 2500K was at 100% :) Still I believe it makes a difference, but I don't except people to fiddle with cfg files to be able to play a game properly on recommended requirements... They should adjust it themselves on a system basis. They read your hardware and set recommended settings after all.
@@zWORMzGaming be careful playing with worker count. setting it to core count might cause more issues. If you want to, you can adjust it for 1-2 values lower than core count
I'm able to just about play the game at like 25 fps on my Laptop on the absolute lowest settings Which really surprised me Here are the specs 8GB RAM Intel core i5-1135G7 Nvidia GeForce MX350
I think you would get more out of the CPU if you changed the RendererWorkerCount value. ~50% utilization seems low for a 4c/8t CPU when my 6c/12t Ryzen is in the 60+% range. Also, my friend has a 4670K (4c/4t) and he manages 50-70fps on 1440p with FSR on a 5600XT.
Basically the game doesn't use HT or it uses very little of it. Poor optimization. I don't expect people to have to fiddle with cfg files to play a game on recommended or minimum requirements either!
@@zWORMzGaming It could be though that the RendererWorkerCount is set to 2 so 4 might give a bettet result. The logical cores can then handle the background tasks. But you are right, this shouldn't be needed because the average gamer won't know how to do that.
Finally got a CPU that won’t bottleneck me in most games, the i7-12700K first cpu with hyperthreding and sadly my 2080Ti can’t run this game very good at 1440p without using DLSS and DLSS on this game doesn’t seem sharp enough
@@havefun1226 yea that’s like what i get in MP without using DLSS and using low-medium settings. The 3070 and 2080Ti are very similar aside from the DLSS and RT versions so that makes sense.
@@n0pe_7 Yea that’s not too surprising the 9900K is still a beast and the 12700K is basically the same cpu just with the added 4E cores and threads which help but not much. Still a 30%+ performance increase over a 9700K but that 3080 12GB is a great card you should be getting more than 160 this game is so poorly optimized for PC its astonishingly bad.
@@-BUGZ- i play on lowest details (except textured) on native 1440p And i get about 135-160 fps… Actually expected those framerates with high derails. I cant stand dlss in this game Fidelity cax looks A LOT better
Thanks for the another minimum/recommended system requirements video as always, you are hella good at this job :) Appearently this game is heavily optimized on the single core performance because my old i5-7500 (from 2017) renders average 60 to 65 FPS average in city with much more GPU utilization (mostly %88 to %96 ish). Here's my own system performance if anyone interested in comparing the CPU performance with 1060 6GB: ruclips.net/video/-aDsA5QAOL0/видео.html
@@zWORMzGaming So true, I guess the GTX series GPUs are affecting severely near the water, I've experienced the same thing :) but as you also said optimization would have been better especially when it comes to multithreaded old CPUs like 4770K..
@@Augmented_Realism Is there any way to make my GTX1650 utilization reach 95% instead of 60%? I have i5 11th gen and I get 45fps avg in Both lowest settings and Mid-High custom settings. The game is crashing too and I have 8gb ram. It never crashed in Warzone1.
Unoptimized game completly. I have R5 3600 and 6700XT and all i get no mather what is stuttering paired with frame spikes all over the place on 1080p res. Great work of 3000 devs in 3 years.
Thanks for the video! I noticed you most propably ran to the same issue, I witnessed with the "recommended" setup you were running: CPU is artificially bottlenecked (utilization around 60% not more). You will experience 60+FPS pretty much all time with those pc parts, if you change renderer count like advised for example in this video as the first tip: ruclips.net/video/5RNaJfVxdcs/видео.html Hopefully this reaches ppl strugling with weirdly low fps in this title :)
You have to overclock if you use a K cpu.. the overclock sometimes makes a huge diference... It is not the same being all the time around 70 with drops to 60s than being in the 60s with drops to the 50s...
15:22 1060 6gb i7-7700 16gb ram, user here, and i get exactly the same fps as your 1080p recommended on minimum settings so i don't really know what are the actual recommended requirements for the game but i would say you need a 1660 super to atleast consistently hit 60fps+
I have i7-3770 and GTX 1060 6GB and I have The same experience where I can’t get over 60FPS in certain scenarios. I went with custom settings but still the same as recommended settings.
Warzone is a highly CPU demanding game. 1060 is able to run this game somewhat smoothly, youre just being CPU-limited. I have this problem with my 1660S, can't wait to upgrade my i5 7400 to a 12400f
@@kennyotsu4357 I saw that I am bottlenecked with my cpu but I hope that in the next 2 years I will get a new PC so Incan play it like it should be played.
I played this on the GT 1030 overclocked by 240+ on the cores and 250+ on the memory got around like 28-70 FPS with FSR 1.0 100% upscaling I would say it's not too bad since I'm used to these low frame rates
Im kind of new to pc gaming and i got a laptop (asus tuf gaming f15) with a GTX1650 (4GB of VRAM), i5 10th gen, 8GB of ddr4 ram i believe, and this game runs at 30-50 fps (sometimes higher, sometimes lower, but most of the time at those fps) with all settings set to low, is there something wrong with my computer?
I was thinking, maybe you could do a video with your “recommended settings” and see how’s the performance on that, but either way, I love this “minimum/recommended specs” kind of videos. Love from Portugal ❤
What I find weird is the 1060 being the recommended, and I've tested it with a 1060 6GB and it really struggles, not even in minimum settings it can get stable 60 FPS, had to use upscaling to keep it running alright, while my 1660 Super, only a 30% stronger can jump straight to 1440p balanced settings or 1080p extreme settings and normal textures (because of VRAM limitation) and both do for a really good 60FPS experience without need of upscaling, although I use NIS or FX CAS to smooth it out a little and activate dynamic res to keep it more stable, the resolution change is not so noticeable with the upscaling smoothing it up
I'm on an i5-2400 (below minimum CPU but it's not a lot worse than 2500K) and a 1050Ti with 16GB 1333Hz and the game is pretty much unplayable. The FPS are pretty much the same no matter what settings I choose. FPS is usually 30-45fps and never hits 60 even with NIS performance. I've tried lowering resolution to 720p but it fucks up the aspect ratio.
I don’t think there’s bottleneck, a low resolution it uses more CPU than GPU, I think you should try with better graphics, I should reduce the “bottleneck” and you should get the same FPS with better quality
i know you are bombarded with this type of comment regarding 4770k utilization, but im pretty sure that game pretty much ignores HT/SMT in your case because roughly it was ~50% of utilization in your video not above. Sure in certain moments you could see like 55-60% spikes but they are that, spikes, in most cases if game ignores SMT/HT its quite typical for msi afterburner to indicate few spikes a bit above 50%, but AFAIK its never "strict 50% or bust". Ofc it doesnt change the fact that it runs like crap, i wonder if getting into config files for render thread command lines would fix that issue. But yeah great video, thoroughly enjoyed it!
I am surprised the i7 4770K struggled so much in that game. My i7 3770, with a RTX 3060, and 32 GB DDR3 1,600 MHz RAM got about the same FPS. ~53 FPS on average at 1080P, ultra, with on demand texture streaming enabled. But I didn't test where Kryzzp tested. I just ran around.
you need to upgrade that cpu, i also have an 4 cores cpu (i5 6500) and it gets 50's fps on average same as you, this game is not so demanding for gpu but for the cpu's is another story..
@@Rogaze Nope, I don't need to. Weirdly enough the i7 3770K (different computer), but that is the fastest I have. But I have a modern computer too, LGA 1700. It has a Intel Pentium G7400. That CPU wins in some games, and the i7 3770 wins in others.
I'm running a i7-4790 locked at 4ghz on all cores, paired with a decent ram kit. I get around 75-80 fps with 1866mhz CL10, with 2133mhz I get around 80 fps without the drops, well 2400mhz CL11 it stays near 85-90fps. This game like Warzone 1 loves fast ram. For 3770 u should use the +400mhz turbo lock (4.1 all core, 4.3 single core) and try atleast 2133mhz, some chips can handle 2400mhz as well. I'm also using a 1650s with optimized settings.
When the CPU is bottleneck going on a lower res is not the solution. This happens because faster the GPU is and faster it does its calculations about graphics, requesting everytime newer data to the CPU that is too old to afford the speed of the gpu... so, for a sweet spot U have to work really hard to find the correct balance between graphics and frames... btw the low req. stuff will not go far from 30 fps so get a good graphics and stay at 30 not below....
Yeah I tested the default recommended settings that the game set, without touching anything. And then the minimum settings with that turned off. Didn't change anything btw lol
Honestly, I'm surprised the I7 struggled so much considering it's still more than enough for 60+ fps on games like Cyberbug 2077 with a slight overclock.
It's because Cyberpunk makes use of hyperthreading and Warzone really doesn't. When Cyberpunk is making your games optimization look bad you know you messed up.
i have a rx570 and a core i7 9700k and 16 gb of ram everything is slightly overclocked and i run 60 - 95 fps without much hitching im kinda blown away on how the game runs it either runs great or crap but still is better than warzone 1
im running an i3 2100 with a gtx 1070 as a media server, I couldn't imagine it'd game smoothly, the file transfers peg the cpu to 100% with compression lol
The performance for these specs are nuts. I have a laptop with a i5-9300h and a rtx 2060 dual channel 32gig of RAM that cant even achieve 60 fps on low setting with DLSS on Performance. All my drivers are updates aswell. Help would be amazing, been watching you channel since before you hit 100k. Great video!
Hey I had this exact problem with a i7 3770k GTX 1070, my gpu usage was like at %50-60 my core count was a 2 instead of 4 while maxing out on usage, you have to change it in the game files
I tried minimum and maximum settings but still get the same fps I use a core I5-3470 and gtx1650oc 16gb ddr3 ram in warzone 1 I got around 50 to 65 fps. Warzone 2 Is very badly optimized.
Idk why but my laptop can't at all play mw2 even though its much above the recommended I'm always stuttering which is annoying but I think it might be due to my ram being full. Upgrading to a desktop soon
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
I have a fix for the stutters, set the VRAM usage allowance to 60 instead of 80 or what it was on default, completely fixed my stutter issues.
Thanks so much
That's ridiculous. So simple to solve and they still not have a patch for that
@Ayanami where can i change it?
@@rul4131 in the Quality settings, scroll down
yeah thank you, what about latency?
"Even while dropping it is not dropping." Wiser words have never been spoken 😁
If you lock the FPS the best way to do it is through 3rd party software like Riva tuner statistics it gives completely smoother frame times.
Does it really work?
@@pabloisblessed777 it does
could u explain a lil more what does the 3rd party software do make it smoother or add fps?
@@kevinjuarez5796 They make it smooth, if you lock up 30fps in most game it will just feel rough
I think you should test more games with minimum/recommended requirements for each game as just as you did with Minecraft. It would be much more interesting to watch
Yeah but that would require an infinite budget and almost every CPU / GPU from every generation!
@@zWORMzGaming 2nd market might be different where you live, but where I do it's totally possible. Because in store gpus are expensive and we have good & secure 2nd online market sites, gpus are really popular especially since the mining boom there.
So one can buy & sell gpus without losing anything on the purchase at all (even gain on it)
@@zWORMzGaming We can donate to the cause! I have a couple older ryzen cpu's lol
@@zWORMzGaming Lol. Yeah
For Minecraft at 60fps;
A 2nd gen I3 and it's Integrated graphics or Core 2 duo with a Gt 240 or HD 5570/6450
For Minecraft at 200fps
a !5 or Ryzen 5 from the 2000 or 6th gen
For Minecraft at 1000fps
A I7 or Ryzen 7 from ryzen 3000 or 9th gen
For minecraft with shaders
Gtx 1060 Rx 590/5600xt (Because AMD does worse with Open Gl)
Minecraft with Seus PTGI for 4k
RTX 3080 (Does Seus even work well on AMD at all?)
I5 12600k or Ryzen 7 5700x
It's always been this way, minimum is usually to "run it" recommended is a playable experience.
Thanks zwormz for testing this one out, I hope warzone 2.0 does not go as bad with future updates like the previous one did, i wonder do they really iron out the problems or make it worse.
It gets worse, its a new game and its alr worse optimized then the OG warzone
@@lnfinyx while it’s true it’s not optimized that well it is a better game graphically which takes more power from the cpu and gpu even at lower settings
They’re gonna make it worse. They don’t know what they’re doing
I think at this point, minimum system req should aim for 1080/60 low in kinetic/competitive games, and 1080/30 low for slower paced stuff.
in that case they wouldn't really be "minimum requrementes"
@@marcowulliampopirers2216 well, you have to decide what the minimum acceptable experience is for most people. Is 480p/30 acceptable? Probably not for most people.
It's not like a real minimum is a thing, since you could always lower resolution more, or put up with a lower frame rate.
720p 30 fps is mostly an enjoyable experience and can be taken as minimum. although for competitive games, i agree, definitely the aim should be a stable 60 and recommended should be 1440p with 144 stable fps
Bro I got i5 11400H gtx 1650 8 gb ram and I get 20 fps on low settings
that's basically what recommended requirements are though
14:56 Warzone 2 so realistic, they tried to replicate Windows BSOD screens as well
CaN i hAz yOuR olD viDeO caRD tO plAY waRzoNE 2?
Lmaooo
Sed 😔
I want the card to, let's play rock paper scissors
@@AlexTwy-p9e 1 year after?
@@AlexTwy-p9e 1v1 for it
Using a 2500K without overclocking is like making coffee without water
Thank you for exposing them, one of the best channels tbh.
I love your videos man! Always brings some positive energy!
OMG IM EARLY AND IVE BEEN A FAN FOR SUCH A LONG TIME UR MY FAV BENCHMARK RUclipsR AND ALSO THX FOR COMMENTING ON MY NARUTO VIDEO ALONG TIME AGO!
Hey! Thanks mate 😁
Np ahaha
12:44 best reaction 🤣
Adjust your RenderWorkerCount to 4 cores. By default it were set to 2. Or if you have more, just set to 3/4 of cores you have.
How do you do that? I might change that
You know, it isn't an average consumer's job to do this. It's their job.
It's running on 4 at least, the 4770K was above 50% utilized and the 2500K was at 100% :)
where is that config file located?
@@hibutamu4884 Documents\Call of Duty Modern Warfare\players\adv_options.conf
Anywhere from 232 to 140 fps. Bit of a mess ruclips.net/video/4xoGUhHI7nA/видео.html | Call of Duty : Warzone 2.0 | 1080p | LOW SETTINGS | i7-9700K | RTX 3060 TI | 32 GB 3600Mhz RAM
Game need to get optimized and to be focused on the gpu not CPU
the game engine is so shit
I noticed this. Couldn't get more than 150-160fps even tho gpu usage was like 70
I'M LOVING THAT POP FILTER ADDITION. Your voice is even more pleasant now, thanks :)
I have an i7 6700k and a 1080. Drops below 60 and stutters constantly. Really hope they fix the performance.
that's bad because I'm getting an i5 6400 it arrives tomorrow 😐
@@christohees9150 yeah the cpu bottleneck in this game is horrible
@@idnotavailable0527 😬
Nice benchmark as always bro, btw 12:45 you should have put that face in the thumbnail lol
And another thing, with my ryzen 5 3600 i suffered a lot of performance issues in this one un particular and and found a fix using the ryzen master just to increase a little bit the frequency and it went smoother after that, maybe the same it can be done with intel to improve the performance by a little with the recommended requeriments, cause im pretty sure the 1060 6gb is capable of way more fps in cod games
no bro it's your GPU... wierdly... 1060 6gb is a Fire card, but only in the reliability department. Not the speed department.
I have R5 3600 and GTX 970 (both OC'ed to the moon on Ryzen Master/Afterburner)
Still can't hit 60+ consistently in mw2/warzone etc - it's like 45-65 depending on where you are and what's going on. also your actual internet connection makes a big difference in your games smoothness. MW2 Crashes every 3rd or 4th warzone game.
This shithouse game has got me wanting to just get like a 2060 Super and call it done
Real niggas DON'T NEED to GIVE NVIDIA their 3090/4090 money. Definitely gonna get a 2060S or some similarly priced RX card....
12:43 Gamer moment
14:42 Was waiting for you to say "That's what she said" lmao
My pc does just fine on wz2, I got a rx560 i5-4590 and 16gb ram, I don't play a one of the presets but I am using fsr on balanced and my settings are pretty balanced as well. it does really fucing good in the regular game as well
the 16gb ram helps too
i was put on recommended settings, and no, it’s not good for fps. you can tone down a few settings and get 90-100 fps
I was using a i7 3770(oc) and a Rx 580 and got around 60 to 90 fps 1440p mixed settings with fsr quality. I think you should get more fps using i7 4770k but the video says otherwise.
Because The Game runs better in AMD graphics cards.
I have a 3060 ti and a i5-10400f and no matter the settings I can't get a stable 100 fps with constant drops into the 60-70s. Its basically unplayable for me Idk how you get that much FPS on 1440p with that hardware.
@@ZayoFPS Recently I got a laptop with RTX 3060 . In warzone 2 I get 90 to 130 (Avg.112) at mixed settings with dlss quality.
Something might be wrong with your settings selection for you to get this low fps or you could prefer visuals that's totally fine too.
@@munifkhan5724 I've tried every single setting possible. Literally everything on low to everything on high same problem. It appears to be a CPU bottleneck so I just gave up. I may try again soon to see if they optimized anything. What CPU do you have?
@@ZayoFPS desktop i7 3770 @4.3Ghz 16 gb ram and laptop Ryzen 7 5800h 16gb ram
The fact you changed cam opacity, very thoughtful
CPU usage is extremely high in this game, I have a 6700xt and 5600x, and at times I'm only using around 50% of my GPU at 1080p, hope they find a way to reduce CPU load
Then try to increase load on your gpu by for example.. increasing resolution scale to 120% or so. And also try to cap your fps to lower rates, between 60-90 fps. These 2 things wil 100% help
I use pretty bad specs and its pretty frustrating when i buy a game and cant run it because the minimum or recommended is very inaccurate
Can't wait to build my own pc it will take couple of months but I'll get there one day
So gtx 1650 is better than 1060? What is Ti?
@@tanmay_6363 I don't believe it is from my experience. Ti, short for Titanium, is their way of getting around the card SKUs that end in 5 in my opinion. It gives them and extra model between two models.
@@tanmay_6363 nope , 1060 is stronger than 1650 , about 30% stronger based on benchmark
@@zacanderson7539 👍🏻
@@tanmay_6363 Get the 6GB model.
I had a 10th gen i3 8 GBs for 2400 Mhz of RAM and a RTX 3060 TI and the game played like shit at lowest settings and with texture streaming turned off and it was like a slideshow lmao and when I installed 8 more GBs of RAM it ran like a champ at medium settings so idk wtf is going on with this game also resize bar was on both times
There are still bottlenecks with modern GPUs if you pair them with something that's less powerful than a 12gen intel or 5000 series amd CPU, because it's very CPU intensive, even the i7 4770 should do a good job at handling the 1060 in most games however it's not the case here.
At this point you just rather crank up the settings so your GPU utilization goes up without significant hit on performance, why they even recommend you to use NIS if the performance gain is 0, just disable NIS or keep it and increase the settings.
I don’t know about intel but my 3700x has no issues playing this game above 100fps which turns into a gpu bottleneck . The 3000 series are still very capable but in a few years I’ll probably change my mind
@@rage2387 i just bought the 5600g brand new for 100 dlls here in Mexico, so i should be good as far as the processor not bottlenecking right? I plan on running a rx6600 or a rx5700xt whatever’s available
@@angelmoreno7843 u bought version "g" which is worse than normal version
you guys know a lot more then me, can i get your opinions on my laptop? im running a rtx 3080 ryzen 7 5800hs 16gb ram but im struggling a lot with fps, theyre all over the place between 75 to 95, and im trying any setting possible but i really dont know
@@reup1k if its laptop then check if its connected to power supply cuz it's going to use more power than being on battery
bro u r a life saver ! love it and keep it up
we need a comparison of these specs vs the better versions of the minimum and recommended specs
love you man you always listen to the comments
Kryyyyyyzzp! I would love to see a video from you testing different settings in this game to show what your findings are for the most optimized settings. I’m currently running a 3070 and a 5900x, but just purchased a 3080ti in hopes to finally get 144fps average at 1440p w quality DLSS.
I know you don’t normally do settings videos, but a lot of people trust your testing over other RUclipsrs. Just an idea, thanks!
I have a 12700K and 3080, and with DLSS Quality at 1440p I am getting 150fps average on the Extreme preset. Without DLSS I have to go down to balanced to get 144fps
can r5 5600x hundel 3070 ?
@@dilaraeira6813 Yip, even at 1080p. You might get some games that have a bit of a CPU bottleneck at 1080p, but for the most part it will be great. Had that exact same combo
@@bestlamegamer oh wow thanks imma get me an 3070 thanks again
You guys have 3070 and 3080 Ti, and here I am with gt 1030 🙃. Praying to get 30 fps 🙂
I'm more surprised how the RX 580 is still holding up quite fine to this day the fact i still have that card for almost 4 years by now and still being used to this day. Altough, wishing for a new and better card by the end of this year maybe.
Have you set the Game's RenderWorkerCount to "4" for the i7 4770k, because by default it's set to "2" and it helps alleviating the bottleneck by utilizing more threads thus pushing gpu usage past 80% and gaining about 10fps or more on average
Hum so the game instals with 2 cpu count only is that what your saying? And where do we change that in the ini of the game?
It's running on 4 at least, the 4770K was above 50% utilized and the 2500K was at 100% :)
Still I believe it makes a difference, but I don't except people to fiddle with cfg files to be able to play a game properly on recommended requirements... They should adjust it themselves on a system basis. They read your hardware and set recommended settings after all.
@@zWORMzGaming be careful playing with worker count. setting it to core count might cause more issues. If you want to, you can adjust it for 1-2 values lower than core count
Yeahh this is what i mean, it woks Bro, before i change cnfg file i cant even reach 60 now my system funs above 60 - 75 fps
@@dolanhape1600 specs?
like that u took the time to test this setup out need more people doing this👍👍👍👍👍👍
Stuttering but playable imo and I would lock it at 30 just for consistency with aiming.❤
30!?!
Locking fps in a competitive game to 30 isn't really a good idea
@@ole7492 Better experience than not playing at all
@@harveysmith6636
You got a point
@@lentzdrums6984 30 is playable, so many games even older cods were fps locked at 30 and no one complained
I'm able to just about play the game at like 25 fps on my Laptop on the absolute lowest settings
Which really surprised me
Here are the specs
8GB RAM
Intel core i5-1135G7
Nvidia GeForce MX350
i have the same specs but the mx550 what do you think i would be able to run it at
I think you would get more out of the CPU if you changed the RendererWorkerCount value. ~50% utilization seems low for a 4c/8t CPU when my 6c/12t Ryzen is in the 60+% range.
Also, my friend has a 4670K (4c/4t) and he manages 50-70fps on 1440p with FSR on a 5600XT.
Basically the game doesn't use HT or it uses very little of it. Poor optimization.
I don't expect people to have to fiddle with cfg files to play a game on recommended or minimum requirements either!
@@zWORMzGaming It could be though that the RendererWorkerCount is set to 2 so 4 might give a bettet result. The logical cores can then handle the background tasks.
But you are right, this shouldn't be needed because the average gamer won't know how to do that.
4670k with a 5600 xt is wild
12:44, takes headphones away, *MERDA*, proceeds.
Finally got a CPU that won’t bottleneck me in most games, the i7-12700K first cpu with hyperthreding and sadly my 2080Ti can’t run this game very good at 1440p without using DLSS and DLSS on this game doesn’t seem sharp enough
I was surprised that it runs on 140-160 fps on my 9900k
My 308012gb is fully utilized
In the beta i was sometimes cpu bottlenecked on 120 fps
Ryzen 7 5800x3d 3070 whit dlss on 130 ish
Fps on 1440p
@@havefun1226 yea that’s like what i get in MP without using DLSS and using low-medium settings. The 3070 and 2080Ti are very similar aside from the DLSS and RT versions so that makes sense.
@@n0pe_7 Yea that’s not too surprising the 9900K is still a beast and the 12700K is basically the same cpu just with the added 4E cores and threads which help but not much. Still a 30%+ performance increase over a 9700K but that 3080 12GB is a great card you should be getting more than 160 this game is so poorly optimized for PC its astonishingly bad.
@@-BUGZ- i play on lowest details (except textured) on native 1440p
And i get about 135-160 fps…
Actually expected those framerates with high derails.
I cant stand dlss in this game
Fidelity cax looks A LOT better
full of energy! love you!
Showcasing the power of the i5 2500k my trusty 11 year old CPU. Still a bomb when overclocked.
u mean it becomes a bomb when overclocked
Literal bomb
I do apprieciate that mw2 was optimized on the ps4 and xbox one to quite the measures.
Thanks for the another minimum/recommended system requirements video as always, you are hella good at this job :)
Appearently this game is heavily optimized on the single core performance because my old i5-7500 (from 2017) renders average 60 to 65 FPS average in city with much more GPU utilization (mostly %88 to %96 ish). Here's my own system performance if anyone interested in comparing the CPU performance with 1060 6GB:
ruclips.net/video/-aDsA5QAOL0/видео.html
Good to know that at least it runs well on 4 threads! Still, bad optimization though, too stuttery and many FPS drops near water.
@@zWORMzGaming So true, I guess the GTX series GPUs are affecting severely near the water, I've experienced the same thing :) but as you also said optimization would have been better especially when it comes to multithreaded old CPUs like 4770K..
@@zWORMzGaming lagga to me with the i5 7500
I guess this explain why i got freeze when i drop from the plane in warzone (R5 1600)
@@Augmented_Realism Is there any way to make my GTX1650 utilization reach 95% instead of 60%?
I have i5 11th gen and I get 45fps avg in
Both lowest settings and Mid-High custom settings.
The game is crashing too and I have 8gb ram. It never crashed in Warzone1.
Unoptimized game completly.
I have R5 3600 and 6700XT and all i get no mather what is stuttering paired with frame spikes all over the place on 1080p res. Great work of 3000 devs in 3 years.
Thanks for the video! I noticed you most propably ran to the same issue, I witnessed with the "recommended" setup you were running: CPU is artificially bottlenecked (utilization around 60% not more). You will experience 60+FPS pretty much all time with those pc parts, if you change renderer count like advised for example in this video as the first tip: ruclips.net/video/5RNaJfVxdcs/видео.html
Hopefully this reaches ppl strugling with weirdly low fps in this title :)
Sounds like a RAM bottleneck.
as Always glad to watch your video always enjoy it !!thanks lot ...have nice weekend and good game..
When I read the requirements after playing the game I called BS, finally a video using the minimum and recommended.
You have to overclock if you use a K cpu.. the overclock sometimes makes a huge diference... It is not the same being all the time around 70 with drops to 60s than being in the 60s with drops to the 50s...
a perfect video as always kryzzp ;)
15:22
1060 6gb i7-7700 16gb ram, user here, and i get exactly the same fps as your 1080p recommended on minimum settings so i don't really know what are the actual recommended requirements for the game but i would say you need a 1660 super to atleast consistently hit 60fps+
5:08 wouldn't be better to play in 1080p with xess in quality.?
for 100+ fps a 3600x, for more 5800X3D or new gen cpus
I have i7-3770 and GTX 1060 6GB and I have The same experience where I can’t get over 60FPS in certain scenarios. I went with custom settings but still the same as recommended settings.
Warzone is a highly CPU demanding game. 1060 is able to run this game somewhat smoothly, youre just being CPU-limited. I have this problem with my 1660S, can't wait to upgrade my i5 7400 to a 12400f
@@kennyotsu4357 I saw that I am bottlenecked with my cpu but I hope that in the next 2 years I will get a new PC so Incan play it like it should be played.
@@malicovjek hope you get your hands on a new hardware ASAP!
I played this on the GT 1030 overclocked by 240+ on the cores and 250+ on the memory got around like 28-70 FPS with FSR 1.0 100% upscaling I would say it's not too bad since I'm used to these low frame rates
Sad for u
28-70 💀
forgot to say it's also 720p so it looks like total crap but at least it's playable
oh i love the minimum and recommended series
💪😁
Im kind of new to pc gaming and i got a laptop (asus tuf gaming f15) with a GTX1650 (4GB of VRAM), i5 10th gen, 8GB of ddr4 ram i believe, and this game runs at 30-50 fps (sometimes higher, sometimes lower, but most of the time at those fps) with all settings set to low, is there something wrong with my computer?
Nope, GPU should run fine, but this game chows the CPU, and there is nothing you can do about it. I'm sitting with the same problem on this side...
the 2500k was a legendary cpu
Nice! Great work keep it up!
Thanks :)
@@zWORMzGaming where do you get most of your oldie gpus anyway ebay?
bro i love your videos😁
Thank you 😃
Perhaps they recommend the K version because they expect it to be overclocked?
Minimum never really meant it playing at 60fps even on low settings, minimum is targeted for 30fps on lowest in every game.
I still have a RX550 due to never really doing pc gaming other then GMOD back in the day. Good to know I can play till I upgrade 😂
I was thinking, maybe you could do a video with your “recommended settings” and see how’s the performance on that, but either way, I love this “minimum/recommended specs” kind of videos.
Love from Portugal ❤
13:30 - U are ram bounded 8+4 gb dont work like dual channel when usage is above 8gb of ram
It's the requirements 🤷
Hi kryzzp! Love your videos but i am still waiting for more standalone videos of gta 5 with more GPUs
Btw amazing thumbnails!
What I find weird is the 1060 being the recommended, and I've tested it with a 1060 6GB and it really struggles, not even in minimum settings it can get stable 60 FPS, had to use upscaling to keep it running alright, while my 1660 Super, only a 30% stronger can jump straight to 1440p balanced settings or 1080p extreme settings and normal textures (because of VRAM limitation) and both do for a really good 60FPS experience without need of upscaling, although I use NIS or FX CAS to smooth it out a little and activate dynamic res to keep it more stable, the resolution change is not so noticeable with the upscaling smoothing it up
I'm on an i5-2400 (below minimum CPU but it's not a lot worse than 2500K) and a 1050Ti with 16GB 1333Hz and the game is pretty much unplayable. The FPS are pretty much the same no matter what settings I choose. FPS is usually 30-45fps and never hits 60 even with NIS performance. I've tried lowering resolution to 720p but it fucks up the aspect ratio.
I don’t think there’s bottleneck, a low resolution it uses more CPU than GPU, I think you should try with better graphics, I should reduce the “bottleneck” and you should get the same FPS with better quality
Why is this looking way better than it should be?
i know you are bombarded with this type of comment regarding 4770k utilization, but im pretty sure that game pretty much ignores HT/SMT in your case because roughly it was ~50% of utilization in your video not above. Sure in certain moments you could see like 55-60% spikes but they are that, spikes, in most cases if game ignores SMT/HT its quite typical for msi afterburner to indicate few spikes a bit above 50%, but AFAIK its never "strict 50% or bust". Ofc it doesnt change the fact that it runs like crap, i wonder if getting into config files for render thread command lines would fix that issue. But yeah great video, thoroughly enjoyed it!
Btw on steam it says Storage: 125 GB available space ,but it's only 20gb somewhere or 30
I have i5 2400 and hd 7870 ghz edition and run wz2 on 50-60 fps
I am surprised the i7 4770K struggled so much in that game. My i7 3770, with a RTX 3060, and 32 GB DDR3 1,600 MHz RAM got about the same FPS. ~53 FPS on average at 1080P, ultra, with on demand texture streaming enabled. But I didn't test where Kryzzp tested. I just ran around.
you need to upgrade that cpu, i also have an 4 cores cpu (i5 6500) and it gets 50's fps on average same as you, this game is not so demanding for gpu but for the cpu's is another story..
i have a i7 3770non k at 4.7ghz runs fine
@@Rogaze Nope, I don't need to. Weirdly enough the i7 3770K (different computer), but that is the fastest I have. But I have a modern computer too, LGA 1700. It has a Intel Pentium G7400. That CPU wins in some games, and the i7 3770 wins in others.
@@Rogaze this game loves fast ram, overclock the ram for best results.
I'm running a i7-4790 locked at 4ghz on all cores, paired with a decent ram kit. I get around 75-80 fps with 1866mhz CL10, with 2133mhz I get around 80 fps without the drops, well 2400mhz CL11 it stays near 85-90fps. This game like Warzone 1 loves fast ram. For 3770 u should use the +400mhz turbo lock (4.1 all core, 4.3 single core) and try atleast 2133mhz, some chips can handle 2400mhz as well.
I'm also using a 1650s with optimized settings.
I feel like they just need to optimize the game a bit better to put less load on these older CPU’s
It's 2022. It's time minimum specs are benched for 60 fps and recommended for at least 120.
i play this on ryzen 3 4300g with vega6 on 1080p lowest and i have beter experience then min.requirements.
10 years ago. I was poor af and has the shitties computer. I use to barely get 20-25 fps 720 low settings on most of my games
When the CPU is bottleneck going on a lower res is not the solution. This happens because faster the GPU is and faster it does its calculations about graphics, requesting everytime newer data to the CPU that is too old to afford the speed of the gpu... so, for a sweet spot U have to work really hard to find the correct balance between graphics and frames... btw the low req. stuff will not go far from 30 fps so get a good graphics and stay at 30 not below....
Kryzzp do you have a benchmark of doom eternal with a rtx 3070 laptop since im buying the game today
Demand texture stremming was on in 9:50
Yeah I tested the default recommended settings that the game set, without touching anything. And then the minimum settings with that turned off.
Didn't change anything btw lol
Honestly, I'm surprised the I7 struggled so much considering it's still more than enough for 60+ fps on games like Cyberbug 2077 with a slight overclock.
It's because Cyberpunk makes use of hyperthreading and Warzone really doesn't. When Cyberpunk is making your games optimization look bad you know you messed up.
@@Evan_Schaefering Ouch. That was a blow to both Cyberpunk and Warzone but still, it's so true
i have a rx570 and a core i7 9700k and 16 gb of ram everything is slightly overclocked and i run 60 - 95 fps without much hitching im kinda blown away on how the game runs it either runs great or crap but still is better than warzone 1
im running an i3 2100 with a gtx 1070 as a media server, I couldn't imagine it'd game smoothly, the file transfers peg the cpu to 100% with compression lol
The performance for these specs are nuts. I have a laptop with a i5-9300h and a rtx 2060 dual channel 32gig of RAM that cant even achieve 60 fps on low setting with DLSS on Performance. All my drivers are updates aswell. Help would be amazing, been watching you channel since before you hit 100k. Great video!
I got a gtx 1060 6gb and i5 7000 something 24gb of ram and get like 60 fps on medium settings
Try to watch all those tutorials to get more fps and optimise your pc
Great idea!
How do you play the game without the game stuttering so bad that its unplayable? (im talking about 2 or 3 stutters per second, not microstutters)
Hey I had this exact problem with a i7 3770k GTX 1070, my gpu usage was like at %50-60 my core count was a 2 instead of 4 while maxing out on usage, you have to change it in the game files
i remember my 2600k was running at 4.6ghz. these CPUs have huge overclocking headroom
Would love to see you test the i5 2500K Stock VS OC
Yeah was hoping this would be in the vid for posterity's sake.. my old PC is a 2500K but it was running way faster than 3.3Ghz (still is)
yah, amd take advantage on this game i was running it on my r9 270x(modded drivers) 1080p fsr UQ low im getting 45-55fps.
Please can you try the rx 470 on every game ?
When i see my 1060 6gb in recommended requirements I got excited... but when I play the game noup...
I tried minimum and maximum settings but still get the same fps I use a core I5-3470 and gtx1650oc 16gb ddr3 ram in warzone 1 I got around 50 to 65 fps. Warzone 2 Is very badly optimized.
Idk why but my laptop can't at all play mw2 even though its much above the recommended I'm always stuttering which is annoying but I think it might be due to my ram being full. Upgrading to a desktop soon
I think a ryzen 5 2600 or a i5-8500 with a 980/1660/590 should be the recommended for 1080p medium or even high
Looks like it’s only been optimized to use 4 threads. Weird that the 4770k is stuck around 50% utilization most of the time if that’s not the case