We've received thousands of comments, likes and views of support for Think English and Bangla. As a charity all your shares and likes mean a lot to us! Subscribe above to keep watching. ❤
বাড়া চোদা খাংকির পোলা কিছু কিছু কুওার বাচ্চা বসে আসে হিন্দু দের রসাতলে ডুবিয়ে দেবার জন্য তাদের মধ্যে এই কিট একটা চ্যনেল বন্ধ কর মাগির পুত তুই কি বোঝাতে চাস? আর্য মানে যানিস? খাংকি মাগির ছেলে?
Thanks for clarifying this piece of history. Slavs never really produced any racist ideology, nor they produced a leader wanting to take over the world. Indirect lingvistic evidence points to a high civilization in the north and around Ukraine. They travelled all the way to India, but the sanskrit words like numbers or word for door hasn´t changed a that much and I can understand them in sanskrit even if they are thousands of years old. (Nowaday Slavs didn´t move around that much, hence slower change of language, they were more in contact with the mother culture.)
@@temporaryexistence1974 Linguistic, textual, genetic and archaeological evidence for the Out of India Theory of Indo European Languages Baghpat Chariots, Weapons and the Horse in the Harappan Civilization - Dr. BK Manjul ruclips.net/video/fZvKpjjTpgg/видео.html Findings from the latest genetic study conducted by ASI in collaboration withe Reich Lab at Harvard using the ancient DNA from Rakhigarhi slides at 29:00 mark ruclips.net/video/Dio3Ep0nlv4/видео.html ruclips.net/video/n4WFk0iEK5k/видео.html ruclips.net/video/f0Lg1b_8N54/видео.html ruclips.net/video/-wIu3dUsmtY/видео.html Here are the tribes that spread the Indo European languages from South Asia to West Asia, Central Asia and to Europe Avestan) Afghanistan: Proto-Iranian: Sairima (Śimyu), Dahi (Dāsa). NE Afghanistan: Proto-Iranian: Nuristani/Piśācin (Viṣāṇin). Pakhtoonistan (NW Pakistan), South Afghanistan: Iranian: Pakhtoon/Pashtu (Paktha). Baluchistan (SW Pakistan), SE Iran: Iranian: Bolan/Baluchi (Bhalāna). NE Iran: Iranian: Parthian/Parthava (Pṛthu/Pārthava). SW Iran: Iranian: Parsua/Persian (Parśu/Parśava). NW Iran: Iranian: Madai/Mede (Madra). Uzbekistan: Iranian: Khiva/Khwarezmian (Śiva). W. Turkmenistan: Iranian: Dahae (Dāsa). Ukraine, S, Russia: Iranian: Alan (Alina), Sarmatian (Śimyu). Turkey: Thraco-Phrygian/Armenian: Phryge/Phrygian (Bhṛgu). Romania, Bulgaria: Thraco-Phrygian/Armenian: Dacian (Dāsa). Greece: Greek: Hellene (Alina). Albania: Albanian: Sirmio (Śimyu). Shrikant Gangadhar Talageri talageri.blogspot.com/2020/03/the-rigveda-and-aryan-theory-rational_27.html Five waves of Indo-European expansion: a preliminary model (2018) Igor A Tonoyan-Belyayev I. Tonoyan-Belyayev www.academia.edu/36998766/Five_waves_of_Indo-European_expansion_a_preliminary_model_2018_ Mayuresh Kelkar
Linguistic, textual, genetic and archaeological evidence for the Out of India Theory of Indo European Languages Baghpat Chariots, Weapons and the Horse in the Harappan Civilization - Dr. BK Manjul ruclips.net/video/fZvKpjjTpgg/видео.html Findings from the latest genetic study conducted by ASI in collaboration withe Reich Lab at Harvard using the ancient DNA from Rakhigarhi slides at 29:00 mark ruclips.net/video/Dio3Ep0nlv4/видео.html ruclips.net/video/n4WFk0iEK5k/видео.html ruclips.net/video/f0Lg1b_8N54/видео.html ruclips.net/video/-wIu3dUsmtY/видео.html Here are the tribes that spread the Indo European languages from South Asia to West Asia, Central Asia and to Europe Avestan) Afghanistan: Proto-Iranian: Sairima (Śimyu), Dahi (Dāsa). NE Afghanistan: Proto-Iranian: Nuristani/Piśācin (Viṣāṇin). Pakhtoonistan (NW Pakistan), South Afghanistan: Iranian: Pakhtoon/Pashtu (Paktha). Baluchistan (SW Pakistan), SE Iran: Iranian: Bolan/Baluchi (Bhalāna). NE Iran: Iranian: Parthian/Parthava (Pṛthu/Pārthava). SW Iran: Iranian: Parsua/Persian (Parśu/Parśava). NW Iran: Iranian: Madai/Mede (Madra). Uzbekistan: Iranian: Khiva/Khwarezmian (Śiva). W. Turkmenistan: Iranian: Dahae (Dāsa). Ukraine, S, Russia: Iranian: Alan (Alina), Sarmatian (Śimyu). Turkey: Thraco-Phrygian/Armenian: Phryge/Phrygian (Bhṛgu). Romania, Bulgaria: Thraco-Phrygian/Armenian: Dacian (Dāsa). Greece: Greek: Hellene (Alina). Albania: Albanian: Sirmio (Śimyu). Shrikant Gangadhar Talageri talageri.blogspot.com/2020/03/the-rigveda-and-aryan-theory-rational_27.html Five waves of Indo-European expansion: a preliminary model (2018) Igor A Tonoyan-Belyayev I. Tonoyan-Belyayev www.academia.edu/36998766/Five_waves_of_Indo-European_expansion_a_preliminary_model_2018_ Mayuresh Kelkar
@Electroweak Epoch you're so ignorant, we South Indians are no way genetically or racially different to North Indians. We are dark bcoz of the skin adaptation to strong sunlight and UV exposure. It's nature's choice. Please don't make it a reason for NOT learning Hindi or Sanskrit. Historically Cholans also used Sanskrit, atleast they didn't have this wrong notion.
@Electroweak Epoch I don't completely disagree with what you said however heres the thing, there was always both inbound and outbound migrations throughout the history which is common to any region. With that said, evidence on our cultural heritage predates evidence on Aryan inbound migration if at all. Although there could be Aryan or any other gene mixing from outside, be mindful there is also mixing within the country between so called north n south Indians for thousands of years thanks to empires, conquests etc hence you'd find a darker skinned person in the north just as much as you'd find a lighter skinned person in the south like me.
Brother, in Tamil David politics and Dalit (Mulnivasi) politics it is used for political gain to the core brother ! (Many riots and massacres have happened brother) !
@Electroweak Epoch brother relax! I am not a Rajput so I am out of Radar 😏! And even if Rajputs are targeted than (Mr. Chauhan) of the publication (The Shuda) would also be attacked and the (Aheria) Jatavs and many more , as their Gotras are same as proposed of the Early Aryan Tribes and by that logic more than 99% of Dalit population would be wiped out (if we go on ethnicity) And I don't agree on your genetic parts (let's not talk it) as it is very controversial . Brother , nothing will happen by riots ! (Riots have happened) nothing was the result ! RSS if wants than can do a lots of things , but does not do because it knows nothing is the result of riots in our situation ! (We are INDIANS ) and for us it is scientifically not a right method ! The real revolution are the Trade and Entrepreneur societies like (IUDL) , and they have revolutionised more the lives of Dalits , even than Dalit politics ! ( CAPITALISM 🤑🤑💰💰💰) is the revolution brother! Sorry for saying (brother) if you are sister !
Minor correction- The Hindu Nationalists usually deny the Aryan Migration Theory. When we say ANI it has some proportion of Steppe ancestry (As per genetic study but some ppl calling them Aryans. It does not mean higher castes have Aryan origin. Entire India has some percentage of Steppe ancestry.
No only in North West Indians have high ANI dna in high proportion, but if you see in lower caste people its actually less compared to Brahmins ‼️ If you go deep south, except Brahmins, no one has ANI dna in them. Even South Brahmins have very few % similar to North West lower caste people ‼️
North Indians are ancestors of steppe not vice versa. Look up out of Africa migration theory which is based on evidence of mt DNA. Indians are ancestors of europeans and central Asians and even east Asians. Indians mixed with/drove away Neanderthals from European continent until they went extinct. I'm not even supporting out of India migration theory. mt DNA is more reliable compared to y chromosome haplogroup for tracing lineages. Indians migrated to Europe and central Asia ~50k years ago.
The narrator completely flipped the sides. It's the left-liberal wing of India that whole-heartedly supports the Aryan Invasion theory while the Right Wing Nationalists completely oppose it.
It’s actually the opposite. Hindu nationalists totally reject Aryan migration theory and leftist-liberals and political parties in the south are the ones actually believe in it. I liked the scientific part of this video, but the part about Indian politics is poorly researched. But I give a thumbs up 👍 to this video anyway for their effort in making this video which is 90% accurate.
True. This channel needs to quit their bullshit. Britishers made a bullshit theory and tried to rub it in our faces and now when it has been proven wrong, they're trying to put the blame on us about how "We believed that since forever".
In this very video he states the Aryans did indeed migrate to India. Just that they aren't the creators of HVC. It's literally genetic science. You can choose to not believe it but it happened.
@@VolcardoReviewer No. It didn't. Read current research papers being published. It happened the other way round. The authors name is Dr. Niraj Rai. His team has published papers in Nature. One of the most prestigious journals out there. This video is made out of propaganda just to fuel hatred towards Hindus.
@@shauryatiwari9400 lol there is ample genetic evidence that North Indians have significant admixture from the aryans who migrated after the indigenous population mixed with ancient Iranian farmers. Unless Dr. Niraj Raj proves that genetic testing all of a sudden is wrong then it’s a pointless argument. Also it has nothing to do with Hindus. Genetics has no bias or agenda.
@@VolcardoReviewer Bruh. I'm a molecular biologist in a pharma company . Dr. Niraj Rai works at Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeosciences. I don't know why you have you head so up your poo poo point that you won't look outside your rectum.
No they don't have Hindu kings ...before Hindu kings Buddhism was all over Asia ...but because of brahminism / manuwadis Buddhism started declined from 500 ad and towards...brahmin kings killed Buddhist monks in india , they vanished Buddhism from indian nepal land and created cast system.
@manu no bro ... Dravidian and tamilians are not Hindus...before 500 AD , south indians have there own culture called aseevaham...this culture was also popular in Sri Lankan Tamils...in this culture, they practiced siddham parampara ( yogic practices) and in there culture shiva and Murugan were not gods and they were siddhas ...but this Arya Brahmins hijacked there siddhas and made bullshit Ganapathi stories and stuff..and one thing Ravana is historical figure but ram is imaginary figure created by brahmins to defame Ravana .. because ravan was so popular in ancient Indian tribe people.. here in Maharashtra tribe people adivasi still worship Ravana king..
I am a student of history. We always read that Indus valley civilization was much more older and far advanced civilization. It was established much before Aryans came in India. And the downfall of Indus valley civilization is still unknown.
Yes , the so called RW hindu nationalist have always denied any Aryan invasion theory and have always believed that we were the once who created harrapan civilization and we look different because of geography , this leftists have now started to contradict themselves
@@charum721 what are prooves the skeleton has about 99 Percent of south Indian dna, and olz see the structure of body to determine race colour doesn't make
@@charum721 Tamilians are also mixed with aryans because In the time of maurya empire, Tami kings allied with north Indian states and kingdoms united north with south so mixing is common
I could argue he didn't even said indian but u knew already that he wasn't saying that aryan invasion theory is indian but he was talking about supremacy of aryan race in Indian politics
I was also shocked by misinformation. The left always supported migration, invasion theory and Hindutvawaadee always opposed it. Yet, the narrator flipped the sides.
lol, it is the original channel "think" in "english" there is also "think" in "bangla" too, these guys do get alot wrong though but it is not related to the name of the channel but rather bad research
That is only the literal meaning. Sanskrit itself means ‘modern language’ but it’s just a name for that particular language. So is the term Aryan, it’s the name the race call themselves.
@@Frederer59 Out of Africa is the best theory. Africans are so diverse BECAUSE they inhabit all the world's DNA in their genetics. It's a rule in evolution that when a small group leave the original population, they lose features and no longest represent the original population. Even though they come from there. It's basic Biology knowledge and anyone who believes in science can understand how the out of Africa theory works. That is why (mostly) everyone on earth has atleast a small bit of African DNA in them.
@V S Almost all videos debunking Aryan Invasion theory is of BJP. The color of skin across the world,near the equator, is darker and far away from it is whiter. Hindu Organisations don't believe in Aryan-Invasion theory. It's a creation by British to bring their Racial ideas into India. India has Lord Shiva who is white as Camphor (karpurgauram) and Lord Krishna who is Dark as the Night sky! Racial ideas are no where to be found in India, except in Communists and Radical Leftists.... Who use this for their own goals by Divide and Rule.
@V S Nonsense there is NO Hindutva book which talks about any racial identity. "Arya" talks about being Nobel... But that doesn't mean "true blood" nonsense. The only books which have this are of commies and leftists...
The dna from Indus valley civilization only matches with a group of people called "Irular" in South India who are Tamils. Tamil language is 3500 years old, thousands of years older than sanskrit, and some say that the ending period of the Indus valley civilization and the start of the Tamil civilization are same, meaning Tamils were the Indus valley civilization.
Nope. Not entirely true. The genetic divide between Dravidians and North Indians is not much. It suggests that both have very similar ancestry. About the language, Sanskrit and Tamil share a lot of similarities along with a lot of languages from India. Don't fight about it. Find unity in all this BS.
@@shauryatiwari9400 no one is fighting here. Why stating a fact is taken as an argument? Tamil and Sankrit are both individual languages. Sanskrit didn't had a script of its own, so they borrowed the devanagiri script and wrote the hymns during 1 century AD. Whereas Tamil originated before 1500 BC according to archeological findings until now. Tamil literature Tholkappiam was estimated to have written 2600 years ago. There are a lot of similarities between Tamil practises and indus valley civilization. I just pointed that out. I didn't degrade sanskrit by any means. And I'm proud that our country has such ancient beautiful languages which no other country has.
@@shauryatiwari9400 well you can search for it with "does sanskrit have a script of it's own?" and read the links. The first link is obviously from wikipedia's and you can find about what I said in 3rd para. If you look for more authentic source, you can buy books and read. Again, it's not a "claim" I simply made. Sanskrit is my pride too. However, that shouldn't stop one from learning the truth.
I tried finding a source to it but couldn't. The Wikipedia still states that Sanskrit is a subset of Indo-European languages, when it has been proven wrong due to incomplete evidence. We need to understand that the history of Indians goes very deep and there have been periods of great exchanges of culture in Indian subcontinent. Hell, they have temples built in Combodia and Indonesia. The intermesh of languages created in India where words are pronounced similarly in most vedic languages suggest a common origin which is now lost to time. We should however try not to fight over it, since the siddhantas written in both the languages have stood the test of time and that is what matters.
Ok, I live in India but I never heard/saw/experienced that the "Hindu nationalists" are supporting any Aryan Invasion theory. Whether we are Aryan or not is not even a significant topic for us, atleast in the Northern India ; There maybe some talks about it in Southern India as there was/is a deliberate action to cause a divide by this Aryan vs Dravidian theory. Nothing more than that.
It is amazing how so many of our own people do a terrible job of representing India. I mean for example, ancient India was huge and this guy has a map of ancient India that goes to Pakistan? So ancient India stopped in Pakistan? So who ruled Afghanistan in ancient India? Who lived there? No Hindus? No Buddhists? No Jains? No one? I mean in Mahabharat they reference Afghanistan. The oldest parts of Afghanistan were known to have Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, and Aryans. All these people are linked to India then. Afghanistan was part of ancient India. And this guy acts like a British map of India is Ancient India then?
I am from central India and had my DNA analyzed by 23andme. My father’s side came back with haplogroups only found in Norwegians and Ukrainians. They postulated that this was part of a population that migrated around 10,000 years ago (last ice age). My mother’s side came back as Tibetan. For my wife, from North India, it came back Sardinian and part Syrian. It really gets your head spinning about who we really are.
Really relieved to see comments section. I was highly anxious throughout the video. On what basis is he projecting these ideas. Maybe some of extremists believe in AIT, but most of the Hindus have always rejected it and think it to be a propaganda by Britishers.
Most of uppercast hindus I guess no surprises there many of them in the comment section........ And it also disprove hindu right wing obsseion being the people who originated from india and spread across other part of world ..... call it migrations or invasion in both way the study smash hindu extremists ...... Also modern day genetic study confirms uppercast hindu got higher steppe ancetry dna which gradually decreases in cast hierarchy.... Mean it makes low cast Hindu native of india or in simple descedents of early humans also the founder of early civilisation in india with which today uppercast hindus got nothing do with .....
AIT was brought by British missionary ppl, they first came to south india, where ppl had dark skin , and when they saw north india they saw different colour of skin there, then they played divide and rule,in ancient text or no ancient scholar has ever written a thing about a different race.In Sanskrit Arya means noble, Dravida means south,it never refers to race
But, I have read this regarding OIT too. In 1583, an English Jesuit traveling to India noted the similarities between Greek, Latin, and Sanskrit. Two years later, in 1585, an Italian merchant by the name of Filippo Sassetti noted the similarities between the words for numbers in Sanskrit and Italian. In 1768, a French Jesuit, upon studying Sanskrit concluded that Greek, Latin, and Sanskrit must have a common ancestor. In the 1780s, an English judge, one William Jones, sent to Calcutta to study native Indian laws turned into a Sanskrit enthusiast. He too was educated in Greek and Latin and he too arrived at the conclusion that "no philologer could examine them all three [languages] without believing them to have sprung from some common source, which, perhaps, no longer exists." Linguists learned of Jones' finding and flocked to India to trace the origin of these languages. Their initial theory was that these languages originated in India and traveled westward, in short, the Out-of-India Theory. The claim of a long oral tradition for Sanskrit seemed to have been the basis for this theory. And linguists set out to prove this. So, doesn't that also mean OIT is bought by Missionaries(Jesuits)too?
looks like you did not understood the video, Aryan migration is a truth and so was aryans and Indians are a mixed race is another truth, all humans are home sapiens is another truth.
I am 83 and I remember my grandfather who served in India whilst in the British Army telling me that he had visited Mohenjo Dahru . The archeologists convinced him that the builders of this amazing site were well above our intellectual level. Just looking at the ancient temples in India suggests that remarkable people dwelt in that land. Thank you
In actual theory supports rss claim that Indian,pakistani, bangladeshis have same ancestors And indo aryan theory is bullshit But periyarist and leftist support this theory I am going to report this shit 🤷🏽♂️
The bad caste system literally became a thing in last thousand year. Real caste system is for identifying skills it was flexible, there was no untouchable a thousand years ago
@@enthusiasticphilanthropist9298 actually literally real texts , there is no untouchables shit in that, it's caste system based on one's skill not one's birth.
Immense respect for the man behind this video. In a time when social media is filled with hatred and political mobilization, it is heartwarming to see someone who speaks facts and ultimately brings in the message that whether we are from a different nation or whether we look different, ultimately we are humans with daily work pressure to feed and maintain ourselves and our loved ones...
-Our Prime Minister is a Hindu nationalist and he is OBC(other backward caste) , -And our president who was proposed by our Prime Minister is a Dalit (the lowest caste - “untouchable”in ur words) -And 60% of politicians of BJP(Hindutva Nationalist political party) are lower castes. -And The party leader of BJP is a OBC. YOU ARE MEDDLING WITH FACTS MY FRIEND Z
I have reported the video as misleading, disliked the video and unsubscribed the hinduphobic channel for the same hinduphobic propaganda as RW doesn't associate at all with what he described us as, neither we support divisive theories like Aryan invasion theory nor we think at all like he said we do.
@@nilnull5457 Liberandu and Anti Hindu. It is ironic how people just project up Very few cases of Extremism of One Religion while completely ignoring the Millions killed by Is!amic State
@@tchatinfo8972 and where has the regional language being removed ? In all Indian states Adminstration is taken in the Mother tongue of the State. I am a South Indian and I have learned Hindi only from 5-8 th. How does becoming Bilingual make u Forget ur mother tongue ? Would u forget ur mother tongue if u learned French as a hobby ? India doesn't even have a National language. Only an Official language. Administration in all States take place in their Mother Tongue. Civil Service officers are made as District collector depending on their Rank. Anyone cannot be arbitrarily made as a Collector. Moreover the lower class even has large reservation. Now it depends on the Hardwork made by the People to excel. Looks like u don't have a clue about Indian administration and basic politics. Read it from True sources. This is what happens when people learn from Idiots like Druv Rather who don't even live in India
@@tchatinfo8972 in History books Only Islamic invaders are Shown Gloriously. No one nations about the Meenakshi temple , Chola Dynasty or about Shivaji . I do support the fact that History textbooks of India is just a waste of time. They actually don't even Talk about North India. What they talk about is About India under Islamic rule. It is true that The South History of India is largely avoided. It is because Under The Congress rule of Nehru , They Started appeasing the Muslim Minority for Votes. So our History textbooks don't Talk about Either the North or South History. They only describe about Islamic History and British Indian History. People from the North too feel that their actual History is not described . And about the language thing, in my State from classes 5-8 Hindi is also taught among my mother tongue. We r taught our mother tongue from Kindergarten. So I see The Hindi classes as an opportunity to learn another language. I won't forget my mother tongue if I learn if I learn another language 🤔 Dear , I am still not getting the issue u r trying to convey . Because we are taught Hindi Only for 3 years and that too along with Our Mother tongue. Do explain more deeply about the issue 😊
Your so wrong when you say Right wingers rely on the aryan theory, instead they're trying to prove it wrong! Thankyou for this Video, I am a right wing Nationalist, proudly so, and your video will help argue the leftists
@@indianinja420 Saraswati River is the answer for all of this. There was a mighty river existed at least 5000 years ago in its died up form. That river started to died up from about 20,000 years ago. That exact location is documented in Vedas, Ramayan and Mahabharat in its different from (In Veda the river was described as mightier than Ganga and Indus; in Ramayan it was not the prominent river rather it was Ganges and Mahabharata clearly described how the rived is already dried up in places). Sedimentology, isotope analysis of river-bed rocks and fossils, satellite images, archeological finding all supported the existence of a mighty river exactly where it was describe in those scriptures. So, of course there was a great civilization existed and they later migrated towards East and mixed with the Native European population. If you search the climatology of the world from 20,000 years and India was one of the luckiest place to live. India was least affected by the last mini Ice age. Himalaya on the north, with the biggest plane on its south and blessed with so many mighty rivers like Sarawati, Ganges, Indus, Brahmaputra, Krishna, Kaveri, and heavy monsoons (someplaces it was twice a year but not like Africa) India was way ahead of other civilization...
NO ONE in India considers Aryan invasion as believable and the notion of them being highest is also NOT thought by a vast majority. The existence of Sarsaswati civilisation dates around 8000 years. That is correctly known as Sarsaswati Indus civilisation. Consider the density of population 8000 years ago. All those killings and conquest makes little sense. It was more of shared integration with occasional conflicts. The caste system came much later and the idea of Hindu faith is ALSO gross misunderstanding. The theories of Aryan and purity is NOT part of so called Hindu nationalist BUT only colonial teaching and it's victims.
@- king- how come our gods are almost similar with greek mythology. Till now the excavations indicate the greek mythology is older. What is your opinion about it ?
^the indus valley skeletons dna matched the irula tribe of Tamilnadu.. If hindians are always present in India why is the skeleton dna pattern matching people thousands of kms away from where it was buried? Lol
Bro u got it completely worng, I don't know from where u are claiming Right wing parties upholding aryan invasion theory.. Almost all Indians want aryan invasion theory to be disproven as It claims Indian Civilization was brought from outside . It was britishers who wanted it for their political purposes
Aryan Invasion may have been disapproved but not Aryan Migration. Second thing don't generalize it as "Indian Civilization". I think you are referring to Vedic civilization. Ya it has it's origin from West.
Yes , the so called RW hindu nationalist have always denied any Aryan invasion theory and have always believed that we were the once who created harrapan civilization and we look different because of geography , this leftists have now started to contradict themselves
@@AdityaSingh-gb2lk nah actually if you look at the people who are pushing for dropping the aryan invasion theory are hard core right wing activists. One of the most prominent names being Dr. Subramaniyam Swamy and many more. I suggest you watch the panel discussion held by the arth.
Sorry my friend read the history of your country india never was united. India is a continent like a europe with diverse people people. I am from Iran a country with a fraction of population of india. If I want to say Irainan are pure or not diverse is my ignornace. The most important thing is what is the best thing for these people accepting their differences and living with hormany together dispite that like USA and europe or fighting for purity.
I have reported the video as misleading, disliked the video and unsubscribed the channel for the same hinduphobic propaganda as RW doesn't associate at all with what he described us as, neither we support divisive theories like Aryan invasion theory nor we think at all like he said we do.
Aryan Theory has been proven True In Rakhigarhi excavation site Two skeleton were founded by the excavation team of Indus valley site . The female skeleton has more DNA similarities with " Iranian farmer-gatherers " And Male skeleton DNA has more similarities to the " Irula tribal " group population in the Nilgiri mountains of kerala and Tamil Nadu . And they did not find European gene called R1A1 gene in those skeletons founded in Rakhigarhi excavation site .
Another video hastily uploaded, without proper research and understanding of the Hindu community, just to satisfy the bubbling inner urge to regard their practices as a sham.
(Right extremists) Upper caste hindu people don't want to believe that they belong to WSH ancestry. You can see in India that the upper caste people have white skin tone whereas the lower caste people have black skin tone, this tells something of their ancestry.
That's over generalization and huge deduction. He already explained all Indians have percentage of Ani+asi. It's only that the steppe ancestry is slightly higher in North Indians (especially higher castes). And no upper castes aren't all white. Most are brown, some are white but most are still brown.
So called intellectuals like you are the ones who first claim these theories are right and after when it's proven wrong you guys are trying to blame the Hindu nationalists for this theoy. Wow that's called hipocracy level..🤫🤐🤭😂 And yay there's nothing wrong in being a Hindu and a nationalist..🚩🇮🇳
What this video says is there are two distinct races in India and the ancient Indus Valley civilization has nothing to do with Aryans. This is totally against the ruling party propaganda that there is only one race in India. Just keep your eyes and ears open and watch it again.
@@tiju.j Go and check your knowledge bjp have always been denying this Aryans vs dravidian theory you can listen to subrahmanyam swami talking about it. If you still don't understand then watch the vedio again no need to distribute your half knowledge.
@@tiju.j this theory was planted by britishers and then followed by Communists and some political parties for south. But now after DNA tests we concluded that there is no Aryans and dravidians but we all are one then these so called intellectuals are trying to turn the arrow on bjp and rss side.
@@shubhangi3796 it's practically impossible for Indians for be one people .there has been many migrations into india even after the Aryan migration be it the Greeks heptalites ,white huns ,kushans etc but then again dna for now is ineffective against detecting ancient migrations ( especially into india) because of the nature on how we determine whether a dna is from india . Linguistics is the best method by far.and that by far proves that a migration has taken place and that language and writting that came to sanskrit came form outside and tamil or proto tamil s orgin is different hence proving that there was 2 distinct civilization that laid it's bid to the Indian subcontinent
Actually Right wing have Supported what you have said 😅😅😅😅 According To Them India is India and All the Muslims Sikhs Jains Hindus Bhuddist Are Natively From Indian Subcontinent only They Actually Move it towards the fact that NON Hindus should agree that There Ancestors Were Hindus Only So They should not Fight with Hindus And They support This by Archaeological Evidences Which suggests that People In Indus Valley Civilization Have Performed many rituals at that time As Modern Hindus Does EG :- " Havans "
@- king- for Indonesian like me, we easily change our view toward something because we are open for foreign influence. I'm Indonesian Muslim and our ancestor used to be Hindu-Buddhist. But there also misconception or misunderstanding among the Indian especially the one anti-Muslim Indian that Indonesian native religion was Hinduism which are not true. Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam and Christianity is the same foreign religion that came to archipelago before Hinduism came to Indonesia, Indonesian ethnic group and tribe practice their own traditional religion like Sundanese practicing Sunda Wiwitan and Javanese practicing Kejawen and so on. So as Indonesian Muslim sometimes i laugh when show anti-Muslim and Hindu supremacy Indian ask us to convert back to Hinduism like it the original of our ancestor religion which are not and even if we need to convert back to original native religion than probably it wont be Hinduism to
@@ernisupriani9270 I'm a hindu and I'm well aware of this fact too. It's impressive that both of our Air force has the word *Garuda* in logos. I see Indonesia or south east in general are very polite and kind in nature mostly. But it's not the case in here in Sub-continent. People are brainwashed and are still are not aware of the current world order. Although it might sound a little bias to you but I live in a Muslim dominated place in India and I see the difference between people of two community. Muslims here in Sub-continent has some weird kinda mentality towards a radical goal which is why you see the current surge of Hindu nationalism which is at times toxic (which you have mentioned). The muslim invasion and the way indian constitution and democracy works it's kinda alarming that's why you see a new wave of Hindu nationalism in India.
Fascinating. I am educating myself thanks to people like yourself. My Irish ancestors (Gailige) come from the European steps. My father told me a story of how we (an elite Army of step culture) moved from northern India further West into Europe. We were selected to pioneer and explore. Thank you 🙏
Yes , the so called RW hindu nationalist have always denied any Aryan invasion theory and have always believed that we were the once who created harrapan civilization and we look different because of geography , this leftists have now started to contradict themselves
@Among Us oh dear. I hope you are being ironic. If not speculate on exactly why athiests think religious fundamentalists are stupid; really, really, really stupid.
@@lightscameras4166 sorry but if someone believes humans started in Jerusalem because of a religious text they deserve ridicule (and scorn, and contempt) ignorance is not a virtue.
I have reported the video as misleading, disliked the video and unsubscribed the channel for the same hinduphobic propaganda as RW doesn't associate at all with what he described us as, neither we support divisive theories like Aryan invasion theory nor we think at all like he said we do.
@@vigneshn2730 : ellarume Africa la irundhu idam peyarndhu vandha vanga than. Inga yarumey original illa. Ellarumey Vanderigal than.Tamilargalnu nammala name sollikira nama inime vera yarayum Vanderigalnu solla koodadhu.adhu anagarigam
@@vigneshn2730 : pannirukanga .pannalanu solli nammala name yematha koodadhu. pala naatkaluku munnadi idhe madiri vera oru video vai Parthen.adhulayum Human origin started in Africa and then moved to central Asia nu than sonnanga .adhavadhu apo adhu Persia ippo Iran .anga irundhu oru group europe ,American continent Noki ponanga innoru group Indian subcontinent noki ponanga. Most important thing ennanna ipadi kilambuna 2 group layum pengal (women) illa .only 2 groups of men migrated .one migrated towards Europe,American continent and other group moved towards Indian subcontinent.women from that Persian region didn't migrate nu solranga.even if some women moved with men they would have died in their journey due to deadly diseases due to low immunity. The men who migrated from Africa to Persia and then to Indian subcontinent lived peacefully here and mixed with girls belonging to India.(there is no evidence how these women reached india or from where did they come to india much before the men's group reached Indian subcontinent.) .they also have done research on DNA of north Indian women and South Indian women and they found out that DNA of both women from North india and South india matched exactly.this proves that women in india both North and South are all and the same. then next research they did was to match Indian women DNA with Persian women DNA. They didn't match at all.plus the DNA of Indian men didn't match with DNA of Indian women.this made them prove that Indian men from both North and South are not the original ancestors of india.it is the Indian women who are the original ancestors of india. Plus the DNA samples of Indian men matches perfectly with DNA samples of Persian men who migrated to Europe, America and those in Iran. The only question that needs to be answered is from where this Indian women came to india when the home sapien originated in Africa. There is no definite answer to this .more research has to be done on this.but one thing is very clear .men in india both North and South are not the original ancestors especially we Tamil men are not the original ancestors as we claim ourselves.
@ABHISHEK RAJU and how does even the facts point towards the speculations that he made.....you are not giving any scientific or rational presentation u r just blondly supporting him
@ABHISHEK RAJUhuhh ridiculous........but he didn't provide any source even i can say things and call them scientific and btw he just mocktailed his own imagination and some studies and called them the facts which is ridiculous
Right wingers/hindu nationalists rejected Aryan invasion theory only when Dalits confronted the oppression by saying that it makes upper castes outsiders then. Its a very recent change in tone. Otherwise, its known that some brahmins tried to convince british rulers to not discriminate against them since they also descended from white Europeans. But britishers refuted them by saying that they were inferior now that they had mixed with natibe indians. Overall its all very stupid.
@Poozhikadakan there is a difference between Rig Vedic religion nd Hinduism. Rig Vedic religion has almost no dravidian influence except a very few loan words. But, Hinduism which should be actually called *Agamo-Vedism* . Agamic part has dravidian roots like d yogic,tantric culture,idol worship. Nd d Shaivism,Shaktism,Yogic culture/Shramanic culture has dravidian roots. Vishnu is just aryanised version of Dravidian God *Perumal* . Krishna is a post vedic created God. Nd Ganesha worship started from south which was inspired from *Ajivika's* (an ancient Shramanic religion) 3rd Tirthankar(Markali Gosalar) symbol which was *Elephant* . Nd Brahma is just d extension of Vedic deity Agni. Though in Shaivism d Rudra form I.e. ferocious form is from Vedic Rudra.But, d lingam worship,yogic form is from Dravidian culture. I am proud of both my Vedic nd Dravidian ancestors. Our Vedic ancestors were truthful,confident,great warriors,alpha males,spiritual,Kings,honest.
@Electroweak Epoch then tell me why d Gurjars,Jatts r Shudras?? They have even more Central Asian DNA than many Brahmins nd they comes under OBC,ST. Nd look at Chirag Paswan who is a dalit leader. Does he look like a native with his blue eyes nd so called aryan features
Dude, you're telling the exact opposite, let me tell you something, I hold views that many consider me as a centre rightist okay, and it's the right wing that led to the disproving of the 'aryan invasion Theory', the left loves the Aryan invasion theory and they kept it in the books and peddled it, the right has always been saying that we are the people of this land we didn't come from anywhere, British came up with that Theory for their divide and rule policy and the left nourished it, the right understands theres no 'Aryan', because we don't have the word 'aryan' in our languages, the closest one is Arya which means and noble man. Btw I'm also from the south. This video is full of BS and almost a political propaganda.
Aryan Theory has been proven True In Rakhigarhi excavation site Two skeleton were founded by the excavation team of Indus valley site . The female skeleton has more DNA similarities with " Iranian farmer-gatherers " And Male skeleton DNA has more similarities to the " Irula tribal " group population in the Nilgiri mountains of kerala and Tamil Nadu . And they did not find European gene called R1A1 gene in those skeletons founded in Rakhigarhi excavation site .
@@mscreationworks5787 fact check rakhigarhi site predates, "Aryan invasion/Aryan migration" time frame by 1000 years. The later part of rakhigarhi was done by 1900 BC, it was a part of pre Indus, at around 6500 BC and also part of mature Indus from 2500-1900 BC, "Aryan invasion" is claimed to be around 1500 BC, and it's not a new thing, there were many foreign Skeltons found in harrappa and pre Harappan era and they were buried in a different manner than the local ones, mesopotamian seals were also found, does that mean Indus valley was a part of mesopotamia? No it means they were trading,these skeletons were foreigners who had travelled to India as the civilisation was at its peak and offered better life, basically 'america of the past'. There's no archeological evidence whatsoever of Aryan migration. It was also their claim that chariots were brought in by "Aryans" until they found a battle horse chariot at sinauli which also predates Aryan migration or whatever the BS they try to peddle.
@@dotsanddash8083 Sinauli site is financed by BJP and Uttar Pradesh government . The excavations in Sinauli were conducted by Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) in 2005-06 and in mid-2018. The same Archaeological Survey of India . which tried to stop and Hide the DNA result of the Rakhigarhi and keezhadi excavation . According to one of greatest Researcher Asko Parpola who specializes in Indus valley civilization and also a Finnish Indologist and Sindhologist , current professor emeritus of Indology and South Asian Studies at the University of Helsinki. According to Asko Parpola these finds were Ox or Bull - pulled carts not horse - pulled "chariots " .
@@mscreationworks5787 I don't have time for your speculations, conspiracy theories, and political propaganda, battle chariots can't be pulled by ox and bulls 😂 have some sense. So much for your politics, why was sinauli excavation halted in 2006? .And the skeleton found at Rakhigarhi which dates back to 2500 BC mature Harappan era, didn't have the R1A1 gene, let's assume ASI "hid" it, why would they? The skeleton predates Aryan invasion by 1000 years, so sorry to break your bubble, you're on a witch hunt for a thing which never was. They have been beating this dead horse of a theory of Aryan invasion for a century now, and still it remains a theory and not a fact 😂,it was just another policy of the British to divide and rule. Do we see variations in the gene pool today? Yes but those variations were introduced much later during the Indo Greek, Indo Bactrian empires, During the Mauryan, Kushan dynasty, when people of central Asia mingled with north western Indians. Aryan migration never happened.
@@dotsanddash8083 Than why did not scientists find European gene called R1A1 gene in those skeletons founded in Rakhigarhi excavation site of Indus valley . But Brahmins and Higher caste people have higher percentage of R1A1 gene or European gene .
Yes, I totally trust Imtiaz Shams to tell me about Hinduism, Hindu culture, and who my ancestors were. That too with one reference by a guy who wrote a book. Not a peer-reviewed paper published in a credible journal, no no, a book. Heck, even I can publish a book today with my opinions; doesn't make it facts though. Imagine submitting this whole paper of your opinions based on one reference to your university professor. Automatic zero. Also anyone worth their weight in salt would know India, and in particular right-wing India, has ALWAYS discredited and denounced the Aryan Invasion Theory and quickly shut down any sort of paper on the subject. They have always said Aryans were indigenous to India. Anyone who knows Sanskrit would know Aryan is a title, meaning noble. It was conferred to anyone, and sometimes whole tribes, who believed in The Vedas and upheld Sanatana Dharma and its principles. Take a quick read of The Rigveda wherein specific tribes spanning from Afghanistan to SE Asia were identified as being Aryan or Mleccha ("other" "foreign" a "non-Aryan) for purposes of identifying who was a friend and who was a foe both politically and geographically. It was never a title conferred to someone based on their ethnicity, race, or even skin color, but rather their beliefs. The English f/cked up more than just our mindset apparently.
Yes , the so called RW hindu nationalist have always denied any Aryan invasion theory and have always believed that we were the once who created harrapan civilization and we look different because of geography , this leftists have now started to contradict themselves
There are three races in India. They are: the caucasian (much of northern and central India) ; the Dravidian ( south india - probably related to the negroids); and the mongloid ( northeast India). That was centuries ago. In all those centuries the intermarriages between the caucasian and Dravidian races have brought about the Indians we see today.
Bro I think U should know that how India got its name then U will get that Aryans are not only Hindus but people living in indus civilization were named as Hindus
@@niweshlekhak9646 Are you saying that Vedic people who were Aryan's called themselves " Gentlemen " Just like Brahmin named Savarkar called himself veer Savarkar . After being begged for mercy before British government
Arya is a title. It means someone who is noble. The English royall f/cked us up by transcribing what they "thought" so many of our words meant, what our traditions meant, heck even what they "though" our religion is about. Anyone who follows The Vedas is automatically Aryan. It just means someone who is noble and subscribes to the dharmic path. That's literally it. Not some fancy Europeanizes blonde hair, blue eyes, excellent in everything because they exist , sort of idea.
@@niweshlekhak9646 Arya means Gentleman Than why Gentleman divided society and humanity by dividing Humans into four categories . And Make himself Almighty in caste system .
@Parshu108 youre lying. Most brahmins even now has the untouchable phobia. I dont spread lies mate. Your right wing does. And aryan theory has its back on evidence like these. So fuck your right wing
This video is to talk about the time even before Hinduism... Its talking about the first people who came from Africa and entered and flourished in indian subcontinent..
The Indo-Aryan migration is a historical fact and no amount of jingoistic whitewashing will repaint the true history. It is well documented in the common proto-linguistics, in the common threads of practise like sati and written in the tablets of time found all over the eurasian steppes.
Hindu never consider themselves Aryan.There is a arya(आर्य) which means man would carry highest value.you have a wrong impression about arya.you mixed it with aryan
Aryans are Aryas...why are you trying to propagate Hindutvawadi propaganda? Why can't you take the truth as truth? Spreading serious false stuffs... Only you exclusively invented the Aryans/ Aryas differentiation theory. Any proven data??? There is none.
@@narenkarthik2469 Indian Constitution 1950 made it by birth. Gov in 1950 had a chance to make it based on financial conditions and could have make it progressive but failed to do so.
We should all remeber Mr Ahmed here had no clue about India and its politics but its serves his agenda so he is happy to mis-inform here.. Not a single person knows or talks about Aryans in India yet here he mentioned it couple of times. we all know why lol
I was also shocked by misinformation. The left always supported migration, invasion theory and Hindutvawaadee always opposed it. Yet, the narrator flipped the sides.
Thank you, King! Had tons of arguments with my brother about our ancestry. He constantly cites "Aryan" as our ancestry but it's so divisive and linked to colourism.
Aryans are just imaginary items as Hinduism lived more before...the aryans are accused of destroying the indus civilization and establishing Hinduism but this is totally false because when Archeologists started their work on Indus civilization they found Vishnu murti which was about 2 lakh 50 thousand years old....So no Aryan invasion happened
@@ItsRaghav123-t6k oh kido they found pahupati and other few idols in indus but it doesn't mean they were hindus they just adapted gods from other civilization and other groups they adapted pashupati idol and named it shiva even kali was from another group(not indus valley) real hindu gods were indra agni varuna surya vayu naradar etc just like greeks And 2lakh 50 thousand year old idol of vishnu? Lmfao If you ask Indian archaeologists when the first modern humans arrived in India, at least some of them are likely to put a date that is perhaps as early as 120,000 years ago. But if you ask a population geneticist…the answer is likely to be around 65,000 years or so ago. Then there's you who's saying 2lakh 50 thousand years ago😂😂😂😂👌
I know right oak sir is a legend and most of indians don't even know people like him i first saw oak on srijan talks channel which is now renamed to sangam talks if im not mistaken
I've done quite a lot of genetic research and this R1a1 paternal haplogroup, which is related with the Indo Aryans is significantly present in today's South Indians (Tamils) as well...One would expect to find it exclusively in the higher castes of South India but what genetics have revealed is a whole lot different... This paternal marker is not just present in all castes but also in the tribal populations across South India...So the debate as to who is and who isn't of Indo Aryan descent is gets even more confusing
R1a1 is found in:- *>72% of Bengali Brahmins* *>60% of Gujarati Lohanas* *>67% of Sikhs&Afghans* *>31% of Iyengar Tamil BRAHMINS* The fact that Brahmins&North Indians have the highest frequency of R1a1 is damning proof of the fact that it's Aryan. If all of Indians had 50-70% R1a1 ancestry you may have a point. R1a1 is brahmin/Aryan DNA, plain&simple. Yes, there is "significant" Aryan DNA in Tamil BRAHMINS, tell me something i don't know already.
@@விஷ்ணு_கார்த்திக் Search Genetics and archaeogenetics of South Asia About Y haplogroup R1a "It has also been found in several South Indian Dravidian-speaking tribals including the Kotas (41%) of Tamil Nadu,[78] Chenchu (26%) and Valmikis of Andhra Pradesh[59] as well as the Yadav and Kallar of Tamil Nadu suggesting that M17 is widespread in these southern Indians tribes"
@Yahweh Official Yaa.. its a standard propaganda but a very professional one. Its good because general people wont easily be able to read in between the lines and connect the dots. Here is a "short" analysis of what he actually wants to say. ------------------------------------------------------------------ INDUS VALLEY CIVILIZATION 0:53 Aryans used as "political weapon" too by nationalist in Europe and America and in India --> see Hindus and Christians use it as political weapon (note - no mention of Islam) 2:04 Massive "Iranian" populations mixed with "(Indian) Hunter gatherers" and thus became the "Indus Valley Civilization" --> see, the original people of India came from Africa and then Iranian made the Indus Valley Civilization. No glory to the Hindus. All glory to the Iranians. And all hindus are actually Irianians. 2:20 Harrapa and Mohenjodaro - we found no relation to the Aryans --> see 1. the Christians don’t get the glory to make the Indus Valley Civilization. 2. Hindu nationalists are wrong to think that higher caste hindus built the Indus Valley Civilization 2:32 3. It was the Iranians as i already told you that just earlier CONCLUSION: The glory of the Indus Valley Civilization from whom the Vedic Scriptures and all the knowledge came; the credit goes to the Iranians. There is nothing like the original Hindus. --------------------------------------------------------------- ORIGINAL INDIANS 2:54 The Aryan Invasion of the British is proven to be wrong. --> see it was not the Christians who made India great. 3:28 ANI - Aryans (European) + Africans who migrated to India ASI - Iranians + Africans migrated to India see, there is nothing like the native Hindus in India. So, all the glory that you “Hindus” boast about is not yours in fact. 4:28 Later many people came in India like moguls and Europeans but these groups did not have their genes spread like the early Irianian farmers. --> see, although many people came to India they are genetically originally Irainian. CONCLUSION: The original Indians are mainly Iranian. All glory of India is mainly courtesy of Iranians. There is nothing like the original Hindus. ---------------------------------------------------- The roots of the author of this book he is referring to, the bashing of the "hindu nationalists", downgrading the Christians in the name of Europeans, silent glorification of Islam etc. I can tell you more and go in a "real" depth of the deception he is making here. His presentation is very sneaky. Its a job of a very sophisticated and professional organization with a lot of money and backing. I suspect its an Islamist propaganda. Its very easy to dismantle/disprove but very difficult to see. But people simply cannot see it unless you use your brain which most people don’t while watching YT.
@@pranavjoshi9084 yes brother, you are absolutely right, your analysis are greater than this video, they don't wanna take Mahabharat and Ramayana or RigVeda as reference. Because they hate our Hindu scriptures and the actual Vedic people.
3:25 Do you have historic proof that women dressed that way? Indian women are not as unholy as you portray them to be, or you want them to be, or you want them to think they are
@@stanspaforabetterlife5058 what study? Bharhut statues from maurya and sunga periods clearly show what they wore. Its neither saree nor lehenga. Saree came in from the kushan period only, which also is quite old.
U forget to mention r1a has the highest diversity in india. It is originated most likely in india. R1a and r1b are daughter haplogroup of r1. R1 is from R and haplogroup R descends from haplogroup F-M89 which is originated in india. These yamnaya dna was itself r1b and it originated in india. If they would ve even migrated to indus valley why we not find any sudden cultural shift. Haplogroup f originated in india. Haplogroup m and n (x chromosomal) also originated in india. This shows that india was orginal founder zone after out of africa migration where humanity 1st settled down and from india it went to other parts like europe and central asia. We find both cultural and linguistic evidence too.
So I'm very glad to see someone try present scientific results in an honest way. But there are a few inaccuracies that irk me. 1:02 "We tend often to think of History as what's written or recorded... but that's only 5000 years old." In the academic context the definition of history literally relies on written records. Anything before written records is prehistory. 2:55 How does this study disprove the Aryan Invasion Theory? I'm not implying AIT is correct, but according to the logic presented here the Aryans could have destroyed the Indus Valley Civilisation. You're starting with the assumption that IVC is Aryan - which it's not. Now run through the same segment without that assumption and you have't disproved AIT. Aryan invasion theory is disproved, but not for the reasons you've given. Aryan Migration Theory still holds true, obviously. 3:30 Graphics are wrong. The ASI and ANI are pretty much the same with the major difference being that ANI has Yamnaya admixture. It's not four different isolated populations, it's 3 mixed ones. ANI = ASI + Yamnaya, ANI being made up of two other ones - Southeast Asian hunter-gatherer and Iranian-related ancestry. ANI = North Indian Population + Aryan population makes no sense... like what's that, extra white North Indians??? Kashmiris? 4:00 Also misleading. Upper castes, particularly Brahmins, simply have more steppe pastoralist (Yamnaya) DNA. It's not necessarily ANI DNA... cause that would mean that everyone in North India is a Brahmin, which obviously isn't true.
1)Steppe absent among harappan and anatolian. 2)Steppe striking very high among Brahmin. 3)Steppe origin in yamnaya. It's not so hard to concluded Brahmin forefathers were yamnaya. But Most north india non-brahmin have less steppe with 75-80% harappan.
Question please: When first humans were living in Africa around 300,000 yrs ago .. Africa, Gulf and India and other land masses, would probably were one big piece of land together at that time ? If that’s so, the narrative completely takes a new/interesting turn, I guess.. ?
70,000 years ago, there were 7,000 of us living in Africa (after a Volcano explosion). There was no "Race", at that time. We were all the same. This is an excellent review! Probably the first Indians, were the Andaman Island people, who moved there 50,000 years ago.
The Aryans could have culturally appropriated history of the Dravidians and other native people in ancient South Asia. My grandfather and few of his friends attended of one of their friend's wedding in 1956 in a small town in Pakistan Punjab and one of the local old man told them his life story of joining the Army in 1940 and then going to North Africa to fight Rommel Army in Libya. After 40 years he met one of old friend after long time who also attended that wedding and he was telling others that it is the story of his grandfather. So people take achievements of others and and claim as their own.
@ꅏꍟꍏꌚꍟ꒒ Many Dravidians adopted language and culture of the Aryans.I myself has L Y-Haplogroup DNA which is basically Dravidian haplogroup and I am Muslim Pakistani speaking Urdu and Sindhi, both are Indo-European languages, and living 50 miles from Indus River.
@Weasel caste system is now more similar in north india than in tamilnadu or kerala . indus valley was a dravidian civilization indeed . there are now barely any brahmins left in tamilnadu since most were kicked out to the shithole they came from which is north india
First of All it is impossible now a days to Test DNA as many n many ppl are getting mixed. But few may hav preserve thr linegae. Ths video is not scientific or right as it only tested few sample .india is having over 1 billion population.At least test 50cr sample 🤣🤣🤣🤣. They didnt mention Ice age . So whole video is Ab. FALSE
Yes , the so called RW hindu nationalist have always denied any Aryan invasion theory and have always believed that we were the once who created harrapan civilization and we look different because of geography , this leftists have now started to contradict themselves
This narrative is based on a total misconception that Aryans were from outside India. Neither Ramayana nor Mahabharata speaks about Aryans as outsiders. Arya is a word of respect. Brahmins never rode horses or even bore arms. It is nowhere said upper castes alone were fair. What was said was that some people were fair and some dark. Several great Rishis were not even Brahmins. Total misconception. Further, Sanskrut, the language developed in India entirely.
I visited Harappa once, it's 40 kms from my hometown. It seems like some abandoned 19th century town The sewers, symmetrical bricks don't seem like the work of some thousands of years old people And I've heard mohenjodaro is even bigger...
They are very modern and impressive. The community was sharing everything, like in monasteries. They apparently died from paludism, once their river became almost dry, like a pond or a marsh, full of mosquitos.
@R G The role that climate plays in genetics of skin color takes thousands of years with lots of isolation to become noticeable. People groups move much faster than this.
@Isaac KAITHAYIL Dravidians aren't Indo-Iranian they came from some steppe in the Western part of the Middle East and were related to the groups that later became the Semitic people.
@Syed Murtaza hey bro stop this mess you think whites will consider you white .. They will never so be happy and let others be...Unknown many people from USA who say they are white but are not fair .. human matters not complexion so brother take chill pill
One correction.. The central right-wing party, BJP is against this Aryan Invasion Theory.. They don't spread this theory but they discard it.. Its the South Indian regional parties from TN who propagate this theory and the central left wing party Congress support this whenever they sit in opposition..
one currection. if i remember correctly , in madhya pradesh a stone tools as old as 350000 years old were found & out african theory has been pushed 70000 years more into past after new skeletons of modern humans were found
would love to learn more ( i know v r all homo sapiens ), it's interesting, I can only 'guess' the north is prob. from mid.east, the south from africa, prob. all from africa anyway, may be combined studies including DNA, archeology, etc. will enlighten us all, i thought the word ariya encompasses civilized, intellect and moral entities summed up as ' noble ', regardless as said, interesting. ( northern China has archeology findings of Europeans too )
Sorry to say, but you are using 2018 paper by David Reich, where as a new revision of the paper was published in 5 sept 2019 and Rakhigarhi DNA paper was published in Oct 2019. I am proving your claims wrong here. 1. You claim: At 2:10 "massive Iranian population migrated to North of India who mixed with Indigenous Asian Hunter Gatherer community and built Indus Valley Civilisation" Rebuttal: Study published says something different. Read paper here = doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.048 a) First farmers of the Fertile Crescent contributed little to no ancestry to later South Asians. b) The ancestry which is called as Iranian-related splits from South Asia more than 12,000 years ago. Implying there was common ancestor who lived more than 12,000 years ago. Paper does not say that this ancestry came from Iranian side. David Reich said that it may be possible that the ancestor lived in South Asia rather than Iranian area. Read point 1 of his interview - tinyurl.com/y6k3jqn7 c) Rather paper shows that Indus people in the past were migrating to central asian sites of Gonur and Shahir-e-sokhta. Over there, the Indus people are found mixing with local of central asia. They are called as Indus Periphery Cline. See figure 2B of the paper, where IVC cline's ancestry profile is shown. The IVC cline DNA samples were 25% of the total samples found there. This indicates that significant amount of Indus population was migrating to those sites. Also skeletons were dated as old as 3300 BC meaning the mixing of DNA sample occurred much earlier than 3300 BC to reach that mixed ancestry profile. If you see the Iran/Turan ancestry profile, you see that every single local DNA sample have this Andemanese ancestry which you are calling Indigenous Asian Hunter gatherer. d) The main point - IVC is the single/primary source of ancestry for South Asia - you missed to say. whee ANI is minimumm 71% IVC and ASI minimum 55% IVC. 2. Lets discuss Steppe ancestry component in present day Indians. You added this mumbo-jumbo of nationalism and High caste & U tried to give it a political swing. Let's try to be scientific okay? Let me show you published evidence from the 5 sept 2019 published supplementary material of all 246 groups of South Asia which are studied. Let's see in which period did the steppe ancestry mixed with South Asians. Let's see when did the high caste - such as Brahmin got steppe ancestry in them. Go to the link (tinyurl.com/yyhbvunn) and download "Tables S1 to S5" where the material is listed. It is excel spreadsheet. Note: Out of 246 groups. 140 groups are samples and only 77 groups are dated. - Go to Tab 5 - names S5 (246.modern.groups). - Column A is name of the groups. - Column P give you dates (both mean and interval) - Interval gives you upper limit and lower limit of the dates. - Column E contains Yes/No if the group is Brahmin or not. - Column AI to AK contains AHG (Andemanese), Indus periphery pool and Steppe components. They all sum up to 1.0 Now lets look at your claim of high class Brahmin to see when they had Steppe ancestry mix in them and what percentage and what is the time period. Because every sample had a different mix time so there is a interval for each group. and mean time in years BC is also given. On average South Asians have 12.6 % steppe component. With Indo-European speakers with average of 14.3% and Dravidian language speakers with average of 7.7% At 3:20 you made a false claim that Aryans entering India 3500BC. Where as David Reich himself said Steppe ancestry arrived between 1500-2000 BC. Lets see so called upper cast Brahmin. Out of 246 groups only 11 Brahmin groups are tested. Out which only 5 are dated. I will copy the Steppe component from column AK and time period from column P Bhumihar_Bihar = 27.4% steppe & Mean of 714 BCE (1612 BCE - 200 CE) over period of 1,400 years Brahmin_Tiwari = 26.3 % steppe & Mean of 984 BCE (1467-501 BCE) over period of 900 years Bhumihar_UP = 23.9% steppe & Mean of 609 BCE (1630 BCE - 499 CE) over period of 2,100 years Brahmin_UP = 24.3% steppe & Mean of 488 BCE (1077 BCE - 130 CE) over period of 1,200 years Brahmin_Vaidik = 16.3% steppe & Mean of 1015 BCE (1394-636 BCE) over period of 700 years. Now look there is no mass migration at all. The mixing is occurring over a period of 700 years to 2100 years. This gradual mixing does not bring language or replace languages. Similarly in all groups there is NO Migration anywhere. There is only gradual mixing over 1000+ years period. There only only 7 groups whose average date falls between 1500-2000 BC out of which (Dogra, GujratiC, Kuruba, Chakkiliyan, Adi_dravider, Malayan, Ulladan) - There is not a single Brahmin group - 5 groups are dravidian - only 2 groups are Indo-European speakers -one is Kashmiri Dogra (22.2% steppe) and other is GujratiC (17.7% steppe) Out of 77 dated groups - only 11% groups have steppe component 20% but less than 29.8%. Only These percentages are also result of gradual mixing of 1000+ years period. There is NO mass migration or even a migration at all. How do you explain Language replacement here? how can less than 15% average ancestry with GRADUAL mixing of over period of 1000+ years can replace a native language? RIPLogic 3. Seems like you do not know that as per the linguistic model. Indo-Iranian live together in Iranian plateau after which the alleged Aryan migrate to Indus region bringing Sanskrit. But there is no model of steppe migration bringing Sanskrit here. This is the second biggest Flaw. a) Do you know that Uralic languages have a lot of borrowed words from Indo-Iranian languages. This is only one way borrowing. It is only possible if Indo-iranians migrated to west into Uralic areas and assimilated with them. Thus only one way borrowing happens. b) How come all the common Indo-European deities (Total 19) only exists in Rigveda but not in any other IE language. The tally (out of 19): Vedic (19), Greek (9), Avestan (7), Germanic (7), Roman (4), Baltic (4) Slavic (3), Celtic (2), Hittites (1), Albanian (1). see comment for more details on deities. Northwest India is the homeland of Proto-Indo-European languages. First you answer above then I will provide more irrefutable linguistic and genetics proof (of origin of R2* in India and R1a* in India. and R1b* west to India - probably in central asia)
The following, for example, is an almost exhaustive list of common Indo-European deities found in the mythologies of more than one branch. Note that every single one of these deities is found in the Rigveda: Dyaus Pitar (Vedic), Zeus Pater (Greek), Jupiter (Roman), Dei Patrous (Illyrian), Dievs (Baltic). Uṣas (Vedic), Eos (Greek), Aurora (Roman), Aushrine (Baltic). Varuṇa (Vedic), Odinn/Wodan (Germanic), Ouranous (Greek), Velinas (Baltic). Asura (Vedic), Aesir (Germanic), Ahura (Avestan). Marut (Vedic), Ares (Greek), Mars (Roman). Parjanya (Vedic), Perkunas (Baltic), Perunu (Slavic), Fjorgyn (Germanic). Traitana (Vedic), Thraetaona (Avestan), Triton (Greek). Aryaman (Vedic), Airyaman (Avestan), Ariomanus/Eremon (Celtic). Saramā/Sārameya (Vedic), Hermes (Greek). Pūṣan, Paṇi (Vedic), Pan (Greek), Vanir (Germanic). Rudra (Vedic), Ruglu (Slavic). Danu (Vedic), Danu (Irish). Indra (Vedic), Indra (Avestan), Inara (Hittite). Śarvara (Vedic), Kerberos (Greek). Śrī (Vedic), Ceres (Greek), Freyr/Freya (Germanic). Bhaga (Vedic), Baga (Avestan), Bog (Slavic). Apām Napāt (Vedic), Apām Napāt (Avestan), Neptunus (Roman), Nechtain (Celtic). Ṛbhu (Vedic), Elbe (Germanic = English Elf). Yama (Vedic), Yima (Avestan), Ymir (Germanic). The tally (out of 19): Vedic (19), Greek (9), Avestan (7), Germanic (7), Roman (4), Baltic (4) Slavic (3), Celtic (2), Hittites (1), Albanian (1). And in all the deities which are shared by the Avesta, it is clear that the connection is to and through the Rigvedic deity: further, the Avesta represents a highly evolved, highly anthropomorphized and highly transformed state of religion and mythology, which shows very few connections with the natural phenomena that they represent, except through analogical comparison with the Rigveda.
@@rahulchawla6256 Really good information. Good work atleast someone is doing their primary research rather than reading off stuff from websites. Can you share information about R1a and R2 origin in India. Although I have seen Dr Niraj Rai and Dr Gyanendra Chaubey in public claiming that R1a in India has 60% more diversity than Europe and they said their new paper is coming soon about R1a origin in India. Are there any other papers already available?
@@gurnidarsingh2830 There are several papers which reveals that R1a is originated in India. The age of R1a is the OLDEST in India than in any other part of the world. please read Sharma et al to see the see ages. 1. Sharma et al - read here www.nature.com/articles/jhg20082 2. Sengupta et al - Read here www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1380230/ 3. Thangaraj et al 2010 - can't seem to find the paper. will look later. 4. Kivisilt et al 2003 - origin in South or west asia 5. Sahoo et al 2006 - origin in south or west asia 6. Mirabal et al 2009 - origin in Northwest India or central asia Niraj Rai himself in several videos claimed that India has 3-4 times more diversity of R1a than Europe and he said he is Certain about R1a origin in India and will be publising a paper soon based on DNA analysis of 10,000 people (the biggest number ever tested) R2 rarely exist outside India. Please look for papers published. Sorry I don't have enough time to spend her.
Took a great time to type this....but thank you for such valuable information....I've took a screenshot of every word that you have typed.... This is such invaluable...❤❤
Not really. Right Wing opposes Aryan invasion theory, the opposite of what he said. He passed of Varna system as Caste system, when Caste means Tribe/Jati. He is full of blatant lies.
Yes , the so called RW hindu nationalist have always denied any Aryan invasion theory and have always believed that we were the once who created harrapan civilization and we look different because of geography , this leftists have now started to contradict themselves
In Sunauli (Uttar Pradesh),a chariot was discovered, which is dated nearly 4000 years old(1900 Bce) that debunks Aryan Invasion Theory! aryan migration theory ,was a theory ,made by the colonisers,to inject racial supremacy of their! They couldn't digest,That Bharatiya (Indian) ,were actually an advanced civilization,which wrote AYURVEDA,YOGA, SPIRITUALITY, MEDITATION AND EVEN great Philosophical,Dance,music etc. They made this, theory to make everyone believe,it was Aryans from Central asia,Who came with such things,not Indians. ANI was used by Dravidian to create ideology and boost anti caste movement!
Then this presenter had to be particularly incompetent and dum to have spent so much time researching and to get everything completely wrong. The Aryan invasion theory was promoted by the extreme leftz atheists and Marxists in India, not by Hindu Nationalists who have always debunked it as a British Empire lie designed to justify the racist myth britush were trying to establish that because they were white they had right to steal India's resources and misrule the country.
@@opaaaaaaaaaaa You're projecting your own flaws of emotionalism and derision onto others. Did you do YOUR research and realize that this ignoray.mus (or deliberate lier) in this video projected complete falsehoods, before YOU made your self righteous and ridiculous comment? Obviously not. The irony is that you made yourself guilty of what you were mocking others for. But then that's typical of you isn't it?
We've received thousands of comments, likes and views of support for Think English and Bangla. As a charity all your shares and likes mean a lot to us! Subscribe above to keep watching. ❤
বাড়া চোদা খাংকির পোলা কিছু কিছু কুওার বাচ্চা বসে আসে হিন্দু দের রসাতলে ডুবিয়ে দেবার জন্য তাদের মধ্যে এই কিট একটা চ্যনেল বন্ধ কর মাগির পুত তুই কি বোঝাতে চাস?
আর্য মানে যানিস? খাংকি মাগির ছেলে?
Thanks for clarifying this piece of history. Slavs never really produced any racist ideology, nor they produced a leader wanting to take over the world. Indirect lingvistic evidence points to a high civilization in the north and around Ukraine. They travelled all the way to India, but the sanskrit words like numbers or word for door hasn´t changed a that much and I can understand them in sanskrit even if they are thousands of years old. (Nowaday Slavs didn´t move around that much, hence slower change of language, they were more in contact with the mother culture.)
@@temporaryexistence1974 Linguistic, textual, genetic and archaeological evidence for the Out of India Theory of Indo European Languages
Baghpat Chariots, Weapons and the Horse in the Harappan Civilization - Dr. BK Manjul
ruclips.net/video/fZvKpjjTpgg/видео.html
Findings from the latest genetic study conducted by ASI in collaboration withe Reich Lab at Harvard using the ancient DNA from Rakhigarhi
slides at 29:00 mark
ruclips.net/video/Dio3Ep0nlv4/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/n4WFk0iEK5k/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/f0Lg1b_8N54/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/-wIu3dUsmtY/видео.html
Here are the tribes that spread the Indo European languages from South Asia to West Asia, Central Asia and to Europe
Avestan) Afghanistan: Proto-Iranian: Sairima (Śimyu), Dahi (Dāsa).
NE Afghanistan: Proto-Iranian: Nuristani/Piśācin (Viṣāṇin).
Pakhtoonistan (NW Pakistan), South Afghanistan: Iranian: Pakhtoon/Pashtu (Paktha).
Baluchistan (SW Pakistan), SE Iran: Iranian: Bolan/Baluchi (Bhalāna).
NE Iran: Iranian: Parthian/Parthava (Pṛthu/Pārthava).
SW Iran: Iranian: Parsua/Persian (Parśu/Parśava).
NW Iran: Iranian: Madai/Mede (Madra).
Uzbekistan: Iranian: Khiva/Khwarezmian (Śiva).
W. Turkmenistan: Iranian: Dahae (Dāsa).
Ukraine, S, Russia: Iranian: Alan (Alina), Sarmatian (Śimyu).
Turkey: Thraco-Phrygian/Armenian: Phryge/Phrygian (Bhṛgu).
Romania, Bulgaria: Thraco-Phrygian/Armenian: Dacian (Dāsa).
Greece: Greek: Hellene (Alina).
Albania: Albanian: Sirmio (Śimyu).
Shrikant Gangadhar Talageri
talageri.blogspot.com/2020/03/the-rigveda-and-aryan-theory-rational_27.html
Five waves of Indo-European expansion: a preliminary model (2018)
Igor A Tonoyan-Belyayev
I. Tonoyan-Belyayev
www.academia.edu/36998766/Five_waves_of_Indo-European_expansion_a_preliminary_model_2018_
Mayuresh Kelkar
Linguistic, textual, genetic and archaeological evidence for the Out of India Theory of Indo European Languages
Baghpat Chariots, Weapons and the Horse in the Harappan Civilization - Dr. BK Manjul
ruclips.net/video/fZvKpjjTpgg/видео.html
Findings from the latest genetic study conducted by ASI in collaboration withe Reich Lab at Harvard using the ancient DNA from Rakhigarhi
slides at 29:00 mark
ruclips.net/video/Dio3Ep0nlv4/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/n4WFk0iEK5k/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/f0Lg1b_8N54/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/-wIu3dUsmtY/видео.html
Here are the tribes that spread the Indo European languages from South Asia to West Asia, Central Asia and to Europe
Avestan) Afghanistan: Proto-Iranian: Sairima (Śimyu), Dahi (Dāsa).
NE Afghanistan: Proto-Iranian: Nuristani/Piśācin (Viṣāṇin).
Pakhtoonistan (NW Pakistan), South Afghanistan: Iranian: Pakhtoon/Pashtu (Paktha).
Baluchistan (SW Pakistan), SE Iran: Iranian: Bolan/Baluchi (Bhalāna).
NE Iran: Iranian: Parthian/Parthava (Pṛthu/Pārthava).
SW Iran: Iranian: Parsua/Persian (Parśu/Parśava).
NW Iran: Iranian: Madai/Mede (Madra).
Uzbekistan: Iranian: Khiva/Khwarezmian (Śiva).
W. Turkmenistan: Iranian: Dahae (Dāsa).
Ukraine, S, Russia: Iranian: Alan (Alina), Sarmatian (Śimyu).
Turkey: Thraco-Phrygian/Armenian: Phryge/Phrygian (Bhṛgu).
Romania, Bulgaria: Thraco-Phrygian/Armenian: Dacian (Dāsa).
Greece: Greek: Hellene (Alina).
Albania: Albanian: Sirmio (Śimyu).
Shrikant Gangadhar Talageri
talageri.blogspot.com/2020/03/the-rigveda-and-aryan-theory-rational_27.html
Five waves of Indo-European expansion: a preliminary model (2018)
Igor A Tonoyan-Belyayev
I. Tonoyan-Belyayev
www.academia.edu/36998766/Five_waves_of_Indo-European_expansion_a_preliminary_model_2018_
Mayuresh Kelkar
বাঁড়া তোর কুরআনে হে গে চোঁচাই ।
It doesn’t matter where you are in the world. There is always some group that claims they are magically better than everyone else.
Yes and this has been going on for years and years
If only every human know that what makes them magical is that they are human, homo sapiens, as all other people are.
This guy is also ignoring how South Indians claim to be more ancient than north
@@nedisawegoyogya yes homo sapiens means Africans.
Homo Sapiens= Early Africans. That's what we all are!
I am from india...never heard of aryans in any political rally or even news... FYI i do not support any political party
@Electroweak Epoch
dasam varnam adharam
Dark skin is impious - Rgveda
@Electroweak Epoch you're so ignorant, we South Indians are no way genetically or racially different to North Indians. We are dark bcoz of the skin adaptation to strong sunlight and UV exposure. It's nature's choice. Please don't make it a reason for NOT learning Hindi or Sanskrit. Historically Cholans also used Sanskrit, atleast they didn't have this wrong notion.
@Electroweak Epoch I don't completely disagree with what you said however heres the thing, there was always both inbound and outbound migrations throughout the history which is common to any region. With that said, evidence on our cultural heritage predates evidence on Aryan inbound migration if at all. Although there could be Aryan or any other gene mixing from outside, be mindful there is also mixing within the country between so called north n south Indians for thousands of years thanks to empires, conquests etc hence you'd find a darker skinned person in the north just as much as you'd find a lighter skinned person in the south like me.
Brother, in Tamil David politics and Dalit (Mulnivasi) politics it is used for political gain to the core brother ! (Many riots and massacres have happened brother) !
@Electroweak Epoch brother relax! I am not a Rajput so I am out of Radar 😏! And even if Rajputs are targeted than (Mr. Chauhan) of the publication (The Shuda) would also be attacked and the (Aheria) Jatavs and many more , as their Gotras are same as proposed of the Early Aryan Tribes and by that logic more than 99% of Dalit population would be wiped out (if we go on ethnicity)
And I don't agree on your genetic parts (let's not talk it) as it is very controversial .
Brother , nothing will happen by riots ! (Riots have happened) nothing was the result ! RSS if wants than can do a lots of things , but does not do because it knows nothing is the result of riots in our situation ! (We are INDIANS ) and for us it is scientifically not a right method !
The real revolution are the Trade and Entrepreneur societies like (IUDL) , and they have revolutionised more the lives of Dalits , even than Dalit politics ! ( CAPITALISM 🤑🤑💰💰💰) is the revolution brother!
Sorry for saying (brother) if you are sister !
Minor correction- The Hindu Nationalists usually deny the Aryan Migration Theory.
When we say ANI it has some proportion of Steppe ancestry (As per genetic study but some ppl calling them Aryans. It does not mean higher castes have Aryan origin. Entire India has some percentage of Steppe ancestry.
No only in North West Indians have high ANI dna in high proportion, but if you see in lower caste people its actually less compared to Brahmins ‼️
If you go deep south, except Brahmins, no one has ANI dna in them. Even South Brahmins have very few % similar to North West lower caste people ‼️
Ancient people of South Iran were Elamites, maybe Dravidian cousins. Before Persian people arrive in the Middle East.
@@im1480 may be intermixing would have stopped after some centuries and then caste system would have started.
North Indians are ancestors of steppe not vice versa. Look up out of Africa migration theory which is based on evidence of mt DNA. Indians are ancestors of europeans and central Asians and even east Asians. Indians mixed with/drove away Neanderthals from European continent until they went extinct.
I'm not even supporting out of India migration theory.
mt DNA is more reliable compared to y chromosome haplogroup for tracing lineages. Indians migrated to Europe and central Asia ~50k years ago.
@@abhinaysingh8306 yeah after decline of budhism and jainism in india around early medivel india caste system become rigid
Aryans are highest caste and use it as right wing nationalism in India?? What?
Nope it's false
The narrator completely flipped the sides. It's the left-liberal wing of India that whole-heartedly supports the Aryan Invasion theory while the Right Wing Nationalists completely oppose it.
If you can't see that, then you are clearly politically blind.
Bjp or hindutva never talks about Aryans or other races. Show me a single video.
They talk about Sanskrit.
You dumb ...Aryan theory is to humiliate great Indian history , It's nothing just rumours...
@Зравасия Ааря no no no...you never studied history..and I think u never enroll yourself into school..you r the fake degree buyer's
@Зравасия Ааря but u believe in islamic invasion and but not aryan invasion they destroyed our harrapa civilization..
@Зравасия Ааря why are supporting aryan not invaded..are u Aryan
@Зравасия Ааря the problem I can see you in this by statement that you are defending your ancestors origin and am defend my origin..
That's iy
It’s actually the opposite. Hindu nationalists totally reject Aryan migration theory and leftist-liberals and political parties in the south are the ones actually believe in it. I liked the scientific part of this video, but the part about Indian politics is poorly researched. But I give a thumbs up 👍 to this video anyway for their effort in making this video which is 90% accurate.
True. This channel needs to quit their bullshit. Britishers made a bullshit theory and tried to rub it in our faces and now when it has been proven wrong, they're trying to put the blame on us about how "We believed that since forever".
In this very video he states the Aryans did indeed migrate to India. Just that they aren't the creators of HVC. It's literally genetic science. You can choose to not believe it but it happened.
@@VolcardoReviewer No. It didn't. Read current research papers being published. It happened the other way round. The authors name is Dr. Niraj Rai. His team has published papers in Nature. One of the most prestigious journals out there. This video is made out of propaganda just to fuel hatred towards Hindus.
@@shauryatiwari9400 lol there is ample genetic evidence that North Indians have significant admixture from the aryans who migrated after the indigenous population mixed with ancient Iranian farmers. Unless Dr. Niraj Raj proves that genetic testing all of a sudden is wrong then it’s a pointless argument. Also it has nothing to do with Hindus. Genetics has no bias or agenda.
@@VolcardoReviewer Bruh. I'm a molecular biologist in a pharma company . Dr. Niraj Rai works at Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeosciences. I don't know why you have you head so up your poo poo point that you won't look outside your rectum.
Hindus have nothing to do with a race, Sumatra, Java, Bali, Borneo all had Hindu kings.
@manu lol
No they don't have Hindu kings ...before Hindu kings Buddhism was all over Asia ...but because of brahminism / manuwadis Buddhism started declined from 500 ad and towards...brahmin kings killed Buddhist monks in india , they vanished Buddhism from indian nepal land and created cast system.
@manu no bro ... Dravidian and tamilians are not Hindus...before 500 AD , south indians have there own culture called aseevaham...this culture was also popular in Sri Lankan Tamils...in this culture, they practiced siddham parampara ( yogic practices) and in there culture shiva and Murugan were not gods and they were siddhas ...but this Arya Brahmins hijacked there siddhas and made bullshit Ganapathi stories and stuff..and one thing Ravana is historical figure but ram is imaginary figure created by brahmins to defame Ravana .. because ravan was so popular in ancient Indian tribe people.. here in Maharashtra tribe people adivasi still worship Ravana king..
@Hare Krishna lol
@Hare Krishna lol.. aren't you suppose to be vegetarian..
Iam an Indian and I oppose BJP politically.But I had never heard of them saying about Aryans😂😂😂
Check old rss speach during of British
They don't say it. But their pups propagate the idea. RSS being the lead
DMK in tamil nadu say to nirth indians
I am a student of history. We always read that Indus valley civilization was much more older and far advanced civilization. It was established much before Aryans came in India. And the downfall of Indus valley civilization is still unknown.
Yes , the so called RW hindu nationalist have always denied any Aryan invasion theory and have always believed that we were the once who created harrapan civilization and we look different because of geography , this leftists have now started to contradict themselves
Yes. The dna from the regions around Indus valley matches with a group of people called "Irular" who are Tamil people. Tamils are not aaryans.
@@charum721 what are prooves the skeleton has about 99 Percent of south Indian dna, and olz see the structure of body to determine race colour doesn't make
@@charum721 Tamilians are also mixed with aryans because
In the time of maurya empire, Tami kings allied with north Indian states and kingdoms united north with south so mixing is common
It was because of decline in Sarswati river as mentioned in vedas
2:44 lol! Do your research, it was not Indian theory. It was purely British theory.
This guy from this video seems to have lost it! 🤣🤣🤣
I could argue he didn't even said indian but u knew already that he wasn't saying that aryan invasion theory is indian but he was talking about supremacy of aryan race in Indian politics
@ꅏꍟꍏꌚꍟ꒒ but he was paid by British and aryan invasion theory given by Mortimer WHEELER not by Max Muller he only coined word and rigveda translation.
Then why do Indians still believe in it. We could have just forgotten about it.¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@ꅏꑀꁲꈜꑀ꒒ There is no evidence that Indus Valley Civilisation is Dravidian, Dravidian civilisation is more costal civilisation.
God bless people from India big greatings from Serbia🙏
Thanks Brother..wish the same to our Brothers and sisters from Serbia
Love 🙏❤️
Gentleman... What's the Nobel cause of wishing 🤣
🙏❤️
If you really want to bless us,stop thinning Aryan as a race ,there was no such race in India it's just a Sanskrit word for respect🙏
Im not sure how much I trust information about indian history and politics from a channel called "think english".
I was also shocked by misinformation. The left always supported migration, invasion theory and Hindutvawaadee always opposed it. Yet, the narrator flipped the sides.
lol, it is the original channel "think" in "english" there is also "think" in "bangla" too, these guys do get alot wrong though but it is not related to the name of the channel but rather bad research
haha
@@DailyLifeSolution propaganda at its peak .
Exactly.
Aryan is just a Sanskrit word meaning " legendary man"
Not a group .
*Noble man
@@abhinnakhale7520 it's same noble man are always legendary
👍
That is only the literal meaning. Sanskrit itself means ‘modern language’ but it’s just a name for that particular language. So is the term Aryan, it’s the name the race call themselves.
@@tiju.j so acc to ur logic islam is also a race😂
Means one who speaks in noble way. Rigveda used it as a toungue / Language
This sounds more like a political video than scientific. I was still waiting for some actual history to replace the discredited theories.
Yes, DNA and blood-lines science is providing definitive information. Out of Africa theory not true.
@@Frederer59 , what does the information say.
@@Frederer59 Out of Africa is the best theory. Africans are so diverse BECAUSE they inhabit all the world's DNA in their genetics.
It's a rule in evolution that when a small group leave the original population, they lose features and no longest represent the original population. Even though they come from there.
It's basic Biology knowledge and anyone who believes in science can understand how the out of Africa theory works. That is why (mostly) everyone on earth has atleast a small bit of African DNA in them.
@@Frederer59 More nonsense.
True, sound like liberal speaking after reading dan brown (*free world) 😅
BJP doesn;t talks about Aryan Theory. Don't spread BS hate, do your research
@V S right wing rejects Aryan invasion theory.
@V S Almost all videos debunking Aryan Invasion theory is of BJP.
The color of skin across the world,near the equator, is darker and far away from it is whiter. Hindu Organisations don't believe in Aryan-Invasion theory. It's a creation by British to bring their Racial ideas into India.
India has Lord Shiva who is white as Camphor (karpurgauram) and Lord Krishna who is Dark as the Night sky!
Racial ideas are no where to be found in India, except in Communists and Radical Leftists.... Who use this for their own goals by Divide and Rule.
They don't because it's a theory and not proven. If you're really looking for origin then we all came from Africa.
Ok bjp Supported
@V S Nonsense there is NO Hindutva book which talks about any racial identity. "Arya" talks about being Nobel... But that doesn't mean "true blood" nonsense.
The only books which have this are of commies and leftists...
The dna from Indus valley civilization only matches with a group of people called "Irular" in South India who are Tamils.
Tamil language is 3500 years old, thousands of years older than sanskrit, and some say that the ending period of the Indus valley civilization and the start of the Tamil civilization are same, meaning Tamils were the Indus valley civilization.
Nope. Not entirely true. The genetic divide between Dravidians and North Indians is not much. It suggests that both have very similar ancestry. About the language, Sanskrit and Tamil share a lot of similarities along with a lot of languages from India. Don't fight about it. Find unity in all this BS.
@@shauryatiwari9400 no one is fighting here. Why stating a fact is taken as an argument? Tamil and Sankrit are both individual languages. Sanskrit didn't had a script of its own, so they borrowed the devanagiri script and wrote the hymns during 1 century AD. Whereas Tamil originated before 1500 BC according to archeological findings until now. Tamil literature Tholkappiam was estimated to have written 2600 years ago. There are a lot of similarities between Tamil practises and indus valley civilization. I just pointed that out. I didn't degrade sanskrit by any means. And I'm proud that our country has such ancient beautiful languages which no other country has.
@@charum721 Care to cite a source for the theory of Sanskrit not having a script of its own. Seems like a dubious claim to me.
@@shauryatiwari9400 well you can search for it with "does sanskrit have a script of it's own?" and read the links. The first link is obviously from wikipedia's and you can find about what I said in 3rd para. If you look for more authentic source, you can buy books and read. Again, it's not a "claim" I simply made. Sanskrit is my pride too. However, that shouldn't stop one from learning the truth.
I tried finding a source to it but couldn't. The Wikipedia still states that Sanskrit is a subset of Indo-European languages, when it has been proven wrong due to incomplete evidence. We need to understand that the history of Indians goes very deep and there have been periods of great exchanges of culture in Indian subcontinent. Hell, they have temples built in Combodia and Indonesia. The intermesh of languages created in India where words are pronounced similarly in most vedic languages suggest a common origin which is now lost to time. We should however try not to fight over it, since the siddhantas written in both the languages have stood the test of time and that is what matters.
Ok, I live in India but I never heard/saw/experienced that the "Hindu nationalists" are supporting any Aryan Invasion theory.
Whether we are Aryan or not is not even a significant topic for us, atleast in the Northern India ; There maybe some talks about it in Southern India as there was/is a deliberate action to cause a divide by this Aryan vs Dravidian theory. Nothing more than that.
exactly.....his statements felt motivated
Exactly bro i also think the same.
😁😁😁😁😁😁😁
Bro RW in india are against aryan invasion theory.
Please do proper research before publishing a video about it.🙏
Sir research published by Howard university
lmao! you have nothing to contribute anything else except based on religion. This channel is based on Science not bound by religious stupidity.
@@HelloWorld11332 wow!! did that come from your religious textbook? Seems like Science went down to the drain!!!!
@@HelloWorld11332 S C I E N C E please
@@HelloWorld11332 that's one trash! No sign of science
I think you don't understand that your actually arguing the Hindutva point XD and debunking the leftwing oppression propaganda XD
Lol 😂 this guy is totally misinformed on this topic
Exactly, last time I checked it was BJP members who were trying really hard to debunk the aryan invasion theory
He's somewhat tight and wrong, even though he's trying his best to be pragmatic about the research
He got the science right but didn't get the politics right.
@@prasadpawar7027 no he just didn't get the interpreting of the study right.
It is amazing how so many of our own people do a terrible job of representing India. I mean for example, ancient India was huge and this guy has a map of ancient India that goes to Pakistan? So ancient India stopped in Pakistan? So who ruled Afghanistan in ancient India? Who lived there? No Hindus? No Buddhists? No Jains? No one? I mean in Mahabharat they reference Afghanistan. The oldest parts of Afghanistan were known to have Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, and Aryans. All these people are linked to India then. Afghanistan was part of ancient India. And this guy acts like a British map of India is Ancient India then?
I am from central India and had my DNA analyzed by 23andme. My father’s side came back with haplogroups only found in Norwegians and Ukrainians. They postulated that this was part of a population that migrated around 10,000 years ago (last ice age). My mother’s side came back as Tibetan. For my wife, from North India, it came back Sardinian and part Syrian. It really gets your head spinning about who we really are.
Apparently it has to be analysed through Y cromozom, it tells you exactly what race you are, if you really want to know.
It gets my head spinning about how dubious and unreliable these commercial, DNA analysis companies are.
@@fatosshubert7272 lol that's only paternal line
May be it was a lone tourist ended up in India
Absolutely fascinating 👍
Really relieved to see comments section. I was highly anxious throughout the video. On what basis is he projecting these ideas. Maybe some of extremists believe in AIT, but most of the Hindus have always rejected it and think it to be a propaganda by Britishers.
Only left extremists believe in such bs.
Most of uppercast hindus I guess no surprises there many of them in the comment section........ And it also disprove hindu right wing obsseion being the people who originated from india and spread across other part of world ..... call it migrations or invasion in both way the study smash hindu extremists ...... Also modern day genetic study confirms uppercast hindu got higher steppe ancetry dna which gradually decreases in cast hierarchy.... Mean it makes low cast Hindu native of india or in simple descedents of early humans also the founder of early civilisation in india with which today uppercast hindus got nothing do with .....
@ШEАSЕL superb explanation 👏
I am relieved to see this comment
They are in denial that Hinduism did not ORIGINATE in INDIA --- this will put them in a weird position to argue with Muslims which came from Arabia.
AIT was brought by British missionary ppl, they first came to south india, where ppl had dark skin , and when they saw north india they saw different colour of skin there, then they played divide and rule,in ancient text or no ancient scholar has ever written a thing about a different race.In Sanskrit Arya means noble, Dravida means south,it never refers to race
But, I have read this regarding OIT too.
In 1583, an English Jesuit traveling to India noted the similarities between Greek, Latin, and Sanskrit. Two years later, in 1585, an Italian merchant by the name of Filippo Sassetti noted the similarities between the words for numbers in Sanskrit and Italian. In 1768, a French Jesuit, upon studying Sanskrit concluded that Greek, Latin, and Sanskrit must have a common ancestor. In the 1780s, an English judge, one William Jones, sent to Calcutta to study native Indian laws turned into a Sanskrit enthusiast. He too was educated in Greek and Latin and he too arrived at the conclusion that "no philologer could examine them all three [languages] without believing them to have sprung from some common source, which, perhaps, no longer exists."
Linguists learned of Jones' finding and flocked to India to trace the origin of these languages. Their initial theory was that these languages originated in India and traveled westward, in short, the Out-of-India Theory. The claim of a long oral tradition for Sanskrit seemed to have been the basis for this theory. And linguists set out to prove this.
So, doesn't that also mean OIT is bought by Missionaries(Jesuits)too?
@@Asura3kWorld
Absolutely but they themselves buried it for their Colonial interests.
Read book Early Indians..
It already proved it is true
looks like you did not understood the video, Aryan migration is a truth and so was aryans and Indians are a mixed race is another truth, all humans are home sapiens is another truth.
Life formed in africa. All civilizations moved from africa to other continents. That's what he is saying
A very pleasant accent free and easily understandable dialogue for a very complex subject. Congratulations young man !
I am 83 and I remember my grandfather who served in India whilst in the British Army telling me that he had visited Mohenjo Dahru . The archeologists convinced him that the builders of this amazing site were well above our intellectual level. Just looking at the ancient temples in India suggests that remarkable people dwelt in that land. Thank you
Lol Hindu nationalist says the opposite, you literally backed Hindu nationalist 😂
That's what I was thinking Right wing never believed the invasion the first place
Deshbhakti is insider view.
Nationalism is outside view. There is no right wing in India.
@@dharmavarta but how?
I mean on the surface BJP identifies with right wing,if I am not wrong
also there are very anti-left
@@kashutosh9132 The so called Right wing in India is a reaction to the rising influrnce of Leftist and pseudoleftism in India.
@@shubh.bapi_9423 so there is right wing na?
2:51 dude r u for real??! That is exactly what they are opposing.
This guy is a leftist. This is how they create false narrative. One person at a time .
This is a semi-political video. I realized after watching it.
In actual theory supports rss claim that
Indian,pakistani, bangladeshis have same ancestors
And indo aryan theory is bullshit
But periyarist and leftist support this theory
I am going to report this shit 🤷🏽♂️
He is just a youtuber. Not an intellectual person. Ignore.
Ignore that. He is a poor educated moron
The bad caste system literally became a thing in last thousand year. Real caste system is for identifying skills it was flexible, there was no untouchable a thousand years ago
That stupidity cost 800 years of slavery
Oho did your ancestors came and told you?
@@musicstudy7610 absolutely 😂😂😂😂.
@@enthusiasticphilanthropist9298 actually literally real texts , there is no untouchables shit in that, it's caste system based on one's skill not one's birth.
@@enthusiasticphilanthropist9298 it's a recorded history as well.
Immense respect for the man behind this video. In a time when social media is filled with hatred and political mobilization, it is heartwarming to see someone who speaks facts and ultimately brings in the message that whether we are from a different nation or whether we look different, ultimately we are humans with daily work pressure to feed and maintain ourselves and our loved ones...
Ceo of misinformation & narrative building.
Agree with the information in the video.
-Our Prime Minister is a Hindu nationalist and he is OBC(other backward caste) ,
-And our president who was proposed by our Prime Minister is a Dalit (the lowest caste - “untouchable”in ur words)
-And 60% of politicians of BJP(Hindutva Nationalist political party) are lower castes.
-And The party leader of BJP is a OBC.
YOU ARE MEDDLING WITH FACTS MY FRIEND Z
True. Either he is making a genuine observational mistake or is a librandu.
I have reported the video as misleading, disliked the video and unsubscribed the hinduphobic channel for the same hinduphobic propaganda as RW doesn't associate at all with what he described us as, neither we support divisive theories like Aryan invasion theory nor we think at all like he said we do.
@@nilnull5457 Liberandu and Anti Hindu. It is ironic how people just project up Very few cases of Extremism of One Religion while completely ignoring the Millions killed by Is!amic State
@@tchatinfo8972 and where has the regional language being removed ?
In all Indian states Adminstration is taken in the Mother tongue of the State.
I am a South Indian and I have learned Hindi only from 5-8 th. How does becoming Bilingual make u Forget ur mother tongue ? Would u forget ur mother tongue if u learned French as a hobby ?
India doesn't even have a National language. Only an Official language. Administration in all States take place in their Mother Tongue. Civil Service officers are made as District collector depending on their Rank. Anyone cannot be arbitrarily made as a Collector. Moreover the lower class even has large reservation. Now it depends on the Hardwork made by the People to excel.
Looks like u don't have a clue about Indian administration and basic politics. Read it from True sources. This is what happens when people learn from Idiots like Druv Rather who don't even live in India
@@tchatinfo8972 in History books Only Islamic invaders are Shown Gloriously. No one nations about the Meenakshi temple , Chola Dynasty or about Shivaji .
I do support the fact that History textbooks of India is just a waste of time. They actually don't even Talk about North India. What they talk about is About India under Islamic rule. It is true that The South History of India is largely avoided. It is because Under The Congress rule of Nehru , They Started appeasing the Muslim Minority for Votes. So our History textbooks don't Talk about Either the North or South History. They only describe about Islamic History and British Indian History. People from the North too feel that their actual History is not described .
And about the language thing, in my State from classes 5-8 Hindi is also taught among my mother tongue. We r taught our mother tongue from Kindergarten. So I see The Hindi classes as an opportunity to learn another language. I won't forget my mother tongue if I learn if I learn another language 🤔
Dear , I am still not getting the issue u r trying to convey . Because we are taught Hindi Only for 3 years and that too along with Our Mother tongue. Do explain more deeply about the issue 😊
Your so wrong when you say Right wingers rely on the aryan theory, instead they're trying to prove it wrong! Thankyou for this Video, I am a right wing Nationalist, proudly so, and your video will help argue the leftists
So they don't believe in the out of India theory or they don't believe in the Aryan migration? Either way you're not making a good point
This guy a Bangladeshi and belongs to the peaceful community. What can you expect from him!
@@indianinja420 Saraswati River is the answer for all of this. There was a mighty river existed at least 5000 years ago in its died up form. That river started to died up from about 20,000 years ago. That exact location is documented in Vedas, Ramayan and Mahabharat in its different from (In Veda the river was described as mightier than Ganga and Indus; in Ramayan it was not the prominent river rather it was Ganges and Mahabharata clearly described how the rived is already dried up in places). Sedimentology, isotope analysis of river-bed rocks and fossils, satellite images, archeological finding all supported the existence of a mighty river exactly where it was describe in those scriptures. So, of course there was a great civilization existed and they later migrated towards East and mixed with the Native European population. If you search the climatology of the world from 20,000 years and India was one of the luckiest place to live. India was least affected by the last mini Ice age. Himalaya on the north, with the biggest plane on its south and blessed with so many mighty rivers like Sarawati, Ganges, Indus, Brahmaputra, Krishna, Kaveri, and heavy monsoons (someplaces it was twice a year but not like Africa) India was way ahead of other civilization...
@@indianinja420 They don't believe in the Aryan invasion theory.. instead believe in the Indigenous Aryan theory
Thts what I was thinking 😂
"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake."
-Napoleon Bonaparte.
Let him fail and totally destroy him😉☻🤗😊
Respect
That’s why he should have taken his own advice
perhaps you should take that advice yourself.
What if the mistake ruins the global peace..
NO ONE in India considers Aryan invasion as believable and the notion of them being highest is also NOT thought by a vast majority. The existence of Sarsaswati civilisation dates around 8000 years. That is correctly known as Sarsaswati Indus civilisation. Consider the density of population 8000 years ago. All those killings and conquest makes little sense. It was more of shared integration with occasional conflicts. The caste system came much later and the idea of Hindu faith is ALSO gross misunderstanding. The theories of Aryan and purity is NOT part of so called Hindu nationalist BUT only colonial teaching and it's victims.
He's Bangladeshi Imtiaz Shams spreading Hinduphobia, his so-called charity gets funding from Arab nations. Connect the dots
Right Wing vehemently opposes Aryan Connection. 🤷🏻♂️
The hindu nationalist are actually opposing it
@Akansha Yadav the word is Arya not Aryan I guess
@- king- how come our gods are almost similar with greek mythology. Till now the excavations indicate the greek mythology is older. What is your opinion about it ?
@@vikrraal Greek mythology is older than ours. No lmao
@@parthpol2202 it is not boy read history
I've learnt more from the comment section here than I did watching the video. Fascinating.
Yupp , this man is building false narrative his channel name say it all. 🤡
All the RW says "Aryan invasion is a myth".
He is talking pure bullshit. The research he is mentioning makes no such inference.
@@vishwajeetagrawal5923 so you are saying that Aryan invasion is true
@@-Blue-_ he isnt
Yeah man. This guy is talking bullshit
^the indus valley skeletons dna matched the irula tribe of Tamilnadu.. If hindians are always present in India why is the skeleton dna pattern matching people thousands of kms away from where it was buried? Lol
Narrator-Bonya Ahmed
Says a lot
🤣
Forgotten Havildar Abdul Hamid, Param Vir Chakra, who died for bums like you?
A mistake he made. Should not have.
So narrator should be bhraman ? Talking about ramayan ?
Lmao we all know how impartial people named Ahmed are towards a specific group of polytheists@@alphaff9939
Sangi spotted 😂😂😂😂😂
Exactly these western & muslim building false narrative
Bro u got it completely worng, I don't know from where u are claiming Right wing parties upholding aryan invasion theory.. Almost all Indians want aryan invasion theory to be disproven as It claims Indian Civilization was brought from outside . It was britishers who wanted it for their political purposes
@Sikandar Suri recent harrapan escalation disproves migration theory!
Aryan means Noble!
@@TheKing-qu8cm it is Arya not Aryan
Aryan Invasion may have been disapproved but not Aryan Migration. Second thing don't generalize it as "Indian Civilization". I think you are referring to Vedic civilization. Ya it has it's origin from West.
Yes , the so called RW hindu nationalist have always denied any Aryan invasion theory and have always believed that we were the once who created harrapan civilization and we look different because of geography , this leftists have now started to contradict themselves
Ehhh...but here in India it's actually the left wing disapproving this research.😵😵
@Hare Krishna ruclips.net/video/uSX4-DKUpn0/видео.html
Its actually right wing
@@AdityaSingh-gb2lk nah actually if you look at the people who are pushing for dropping the aryan invasion theory are hard core right wing activists. One of the most prominent names being Dr. Subramaniyam Swamy and many more.
I suggest you watch the panel discussion held by the arth.
@@AdityaSingh-gb2lk no its actually not XD
@Durden Tyler Your confused XD
No right wing people use that word " aryan" because we know that this word divided india in many ways
What the hell is this
Sorry my friend read the history of your country india never was united. India is a continent like a europe with diverse people people.
I am from Iran a country with a fraction of population of india. If I want to say Irainan are pure or not diverse is my ignornace.
The most important thing is what is the best thing for these people accepting their differences and living with hormany together dispite that like USA and europe or fighting for purity.
@@mb.khatibi6444 you seem dumb!
Yeah now they learn making Hindu Vs Muslim is best to fulfill their power greed.
BTW they know how to deal with cast system.
@@fahadbadroos You care about dealing with Ahmadis !! Let caste system on us !!
I have reported the video as misleading, disliked the video and unsubscribed the channel for the same hinduphobic propaganda as RW doesn't associate at all with what he described us as, neither we support divisive theories like Aryan invasion theory nor we think at all like he said we do.
Aryan is Sanskrit word means noble person so it's more correctly European migration theory
Right wing in India was always against the Aryan Invasion theory and caste system .
Correct.
Aryan Theory has been proven True
In Rakhigarhi excavation site Two skeleton were founded by the excavation team of Indus valley site .
The female skeleton has more DNA similarities with " Iranian farmer-gatherers "
And Male skeleton DNA has more similarities to the " Irula tribal " group population in the Nilgiri mountains of kerala and Tamil Nadu .
And they did not find European gene called R1A1 gene in those skeletons founded in Rakhigarhi excavation site .
Yes.
Another video hastily uploaded, without proper research and understanding of the Hindu community, just to satisfy the bubbling inner urge to regard their practices as a sham.
Most religious practices are sham , regardless of it being Hindu or not
I admire your presentation skills. However Hindu nationalists are against the Aryan invasion/migration/tourism theory.
Change it from Aryan invasion to Aryan migration and eventual dominance. It's a proven fact that upper caste Hindus have more central Asian DNA.
@@yorgenibnstrangle3072 😂😂just a myth
@@bruhhh8570 whatever you say Mr kala
@@yorgenibnstrangle3072 Mr kala who? Back then it was invasion failed drastically then became migration the picnic theroy 😂
@@bruhhh8570 you are right. Very smart kala.
(Right extremists) Upper caste hindu people don't want to believe that they belong to WSH ancestry. You can see in India that the upper caste people have white skin tone whereas the lower caste people have black skin tone, this tells something of their ancestry.
That's over generalization and huge deduction. He already explained all Indians have percentage of Ani+asi. It's only that the steppe ancestry is slightly higher in North Indians (especially higher castes).
And no upper castes aren't all white. Most are brown, some are white but most are still brown.
How wrong could you be
This video yes
The bjp rss fucking everyone disregards the aryan theory
I can show you many upper caste people who have jet black skin tone and vice versa.
Its a stereotype, upper caste to have light skin tone and lower cast have dark skin only.😂😂😂dumb
I am Dalit but I have fair skin and Aryan features.😂
So called intellectuals like you are the ones who first claim these theories are right and after when it's proven wrong you guys are trying to blame the Hindu nationalists for this theoy. Wow that's called hipocracy level..🤫🤐🤭😂 And yay there's nothing wrong in being a Hindu and a nationalist..🚩🇮🇳
Jai Hind. right on.
What this video says is there are two distinct races in India and the ancient Indus Valley civilization has nothing to do with Aryans. This is totally against the ruling party propaganda that there is only one race in India. Just keep your eyes and ears open and watch it again.
@@tiju.j Go and check your knowledge bjp have always been denying this Aryans vs dravidian theory you can listen to subrahmanyam swami talking about it. If you still don't understand then watch the vedio again no need to distribute your half knowledge.
@@tiju.j this theory was planted by britishers and then followed by Communists and some political parties for south. But now after DNA tests we concluded that there is no Aryans and dravidians but we all are one then these so called intellectuals are trying to turn the arrow on bjp and rss side.
@@shubhangi3796 it's practically impossible for Indians for be one people .there has been many migrations into india even after the Aryan migration be it the Greeks heptalites ,white huns ,kushans etc but then again dna for now is ineffective against detecting ancient migrations ( especially into india) because of the nature on how we determine whether a dna is from india . Linguistics is the best method by far.and that by far proves that a migration has taken place and that language and writting that came to sanskrit came form outside and tamil or proto tamil s orgin is different hence proving that there was 2 distinct civilization that laid it's bid to the Indian subcontinent
Machan, As long as South Asia preserves Dhamma, we will be fine 🇱🇰
Why do you wrote dharma as dhama stop deteriorating indian culture😡😡😠
@@vve2059 it's the same you idiot, don't be so ignorant
@@vve2059 In Buddhism Dharma is Dhamma.
you mean dharma right?
@@vve2059 Dharma is Sanskrit, Dhamma has roots in Pali. Ultimately it's the same. Don't make atrocious comments.
Actually Right wing have Supported what you have said
😅😅😅😅
According To Them
India is India and
All the Muslims
Sikhs Jains
Hindus
Bhuddist
Are Natively From Indian Subcontinent only
They Actually Move it towards the fact that
NON Hindus should agree that
There Ancestors Were Hindus Only
So
They should not Fight with Hindus
And They support This by Archaeological Evidences
Which suggests that
People In Indus Valley Civilization
Have Performed many rituals at that time
As Modern Hindus Does
EG :- " Havans "
@- king-
Indian Subcontinent Muslim *
@- king- for Indonesian like me, we easily change our view toward something because we are open for foreign influence. I'm Indonesian Muslim and our ancestor used to be Hindu-Buddhist. But there also misconception or misunderstanding among the Indian especially the one anti-Muslim Indian that Indonesian native religion was Hinduism which are not true. Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam and Christianity is the same foreign religion that came to archipelago before Hinduism came to Indonesia, Indonesian ethnic group and tribe practice their own traditional religion like Sundanese practicing Sunda Wiwitan and Javanese practicing Kejawen and so on. So as Indonesian Muslim sometimes i laugh when show anti-Muslim and Hindu supremacy Indian ask us to convert back to Hinduism like it the original of our ancestor religion which are not and even if we need to convert back to original native religion than probably it wont be Hinduism to
@@ernisupriani9270 I'm a hindu and I'm well aware of this fact too. It's impressive that both of our Air force has the word *Garuda* in logos.
I see Indonesia or south east in general are very polite and kind in nature mostly. But it's not the case in here in Sub-continent. People are brainwashed and are still are not aware of the current world order. Although it might sound a little bias to you but I live in a Muslim dominated place in India and I see the difference between people of two community. Muslims here in Sub-continent has some weird kinda mentality towards a radical goal which is why you see the current surge of Hindu nationalism which is at times toxic (which you have mentioned). The muslim invasion and the way indian constitution and democracy works it's kinda alarming that's why you see a new wave of Hindu nationalism in India.
@@ernisupriani9270 I also agree with u. that u had U r own religions in indonesia .
Fascinating. I am educating myself thanks to people like yourself. My Irish ancestors (Gailige) come from the European steps. My father told me a story of how we (an elite Army of step culture) moved from northern India further West into Europe. We were selected to pioneer and explore. Thank you 🙏
Why do I get a vibe that it's not a history lession, more of a shoving of questionable political opinions?
True! His logic is preconceived notion without proper research or paid agenda or he is going bonkers!
@@akshitthapliyal lodu lalit modu lalit.
@P B ishalodu
Yes , the so called RW hindu nationalist have always denied any Aryan invasion theory and have always believed that we were the once who created harrapan civilization and we look different because of geography , this leftists have now started to contradict themselves
Yes, we are all mixed in one giant bowl of genetics called homo sapiens. There's no such thing as "pure race" 😁
Yes, all were can really say is that if we go back far enough we are all Africans !
@Among Us oh dear. I hope you are being ironic. If not speculate on exactly why athiests think religious fundamentalists are stupid; really, really, really stupid.
@@jonlinin9682 again, generalizing all religious people as fanatics is a huge mistake
@@lightscameras4166 sorry but if someone believes humans started in Jerusalem because of a religious text they deserve ridicule (and scorn, and contempt) ignorance is not a virtue.
@@jonlinin9682 Amen Ra👏🏾👏🏾
It's the left wing that hold AIT tight and right tried to debunk it
I have reported the video as misleading, disliked the video and unsubscribed the channel for the same hinduphobic propaganda as RW doesn't associate at all with what he described us as, neither we support divisive theories like Aryan invasion theory nor we think at all like he said we do.
Finally a more truthful presentation than the many on the net. Good luck and keep it up.
This video looks like a video against BJP even though I'm a liberal. Most of the information and timeline of migration is false in the video.
I mean... Not that I'm saying you're wrong but how do you know if the info is false in the video?
@@Star-fb8jm cause we just know the ground realities how do you know it right btw?
It's not. This has been done at careful research. Please read David Reich et all.
Dude, Take time to analyze the facts written in Tamil too.
Anna antha DNA vetchu Tamil peoples DNA VA check pannagala illaiyaa...konjam solringala pls.....
@@kalaimsc5876 panna வில்லை
@@kalaimsc5876 Adhu panna matanga.. panna unmai thaerindhu vidum... Sindhu valley nagarigamum keeladi nagarigamum orae makkal valndha idamaga Iruka vaipu undu..
@@vigneshn2730 : ellarume Africa la irundhu idam peyarndhu vandha vanga than. Inga yarumey original illa. Ellarumey Vanderigal than.Tamilargalnu nammala name sollikira nama inime vera yarayum Vanderigalnu solla koodadhu.adhu anagarigam
@@vigneshn2730 : pannirukanga .pannalanu solli nammala name yematha koodadhu. pala naatkaluku munnadi idhe madiri vera oru video vai Parthen.adhulayum Human origin started in Africa and then moved to central Asia nu than sonnanga .adhavadhu apo adhu Persia ippo Iran .anga irundhu oru group europe ,American continent Noki ponanga innoru group Indian subcontinent noki ponanga.
Most important thing ennanna ipadi kilambuna 2 group layum pengal (women) illa .only 2 groups of men migrated .one migrated towards Europe,American continent and other group moved towards Indian subcontinent.women from that Persian region didn't migrate nu solranga.even if some women moved with men they would have died in their journey due to deadly diseases due to low immunity.
The men who migrated from Africa to Persia and then to Indian subcontinent lived peacefully here and mixed with girls belonging to India.(there is no evidence how these women reached india or from where did they come to india much before the men's group reached Indian subcontinent.) .they also have done research on DNA of north Indian women and South Indian women and they found out that DNA of both women from North india and South india matched exactly.this proves that women in india both North and South are all and the same. then next research they did was to match Indian women DNA with Persian women DNA. They didn't match at all.plus the DNA of Indian men didn't match with DNA of Indian women.this made them prove that Indian men from both North and South are not the original ancestors of india.it is the Indian women who are the original ancestors of india.
Plus the DNA samples of Indian men matches perfectly with DNA samples of Persian men who migrated to Europe, America and those in Iran.
The only question that needs to be answered is from where this Indian women came to india when the home sapien originated in Africa. There is no definite answer to this .more research has to be done on this.but one thing is very clear .men in india both North and South are not the original ancestors especially we Tamil men are not the original ancestors as we claim ourselves.
Another day another english telling us our history, nothing unusual
Someone intellectual found.
@ABHISHEK RAJU all things he said are mere speculations......based on the same research many speculations has been done.....
@ABHISHEK RAJU eeshhh give me the evidence that this is the most accepted one.....u telling this is the most accepted one can't make it acceptable
@ABHISHEK RAJU and how does even the facts point towards the speculations that he made.....you are not giving any scientific or rational presentation u r just blondly supporting him
@ABHISHEK RAJUhuhh ridiculous........but he didn't provide any source even i can say things and call them scientific and btw he just mocktailed his own imagination and some studies and called them the facts which is ridiculous
Right wingers/hindu nationalists rejected Aryan invasion theory only when Dalits confronted the oppression by saying that it makes upper castes outsiders then. Its a very recent change in tone. Otherwise, its known that some brahmins tried to convince british rulers to not discriminate against them since they also descended from white Europeans. But britishers refuted them by saying that they were inferior now that they had mixed with natibe indians. Overall its all very stupid.
The evidence perfectly suggest Varana wasn't based on Brith XD since it was a later 5 centry distortion #facts
Yes true, a societal distortion in the mindset occurred only around 5th to 10th century
@Poozhikadakan there is a difference between Rig Vedic religion nd Hinduism. Rig Vedic religion has almost no dravidian influence except a very few loan words. But, Hinduism which should be actually called *Agamo-Vedism* . Agamic part has dravidian roots like d yogic,tantric culture,idol worship. Nd d Shaivism,Shaktism,Yogic culture/Shramanic culture has dravidian roots. Vishnu is just aryanised version of Dravidian God *Perumal* . Krishna is a post vedic created God. Nd Ganesha worship started from south which was inspired from *Ajivika's* (an ancient Shramanic religion) 3rd Tirthankar(Markali Gosalar) symbol which was *Elephant* . Nd Brahma is just d extension of Vedic deity Agni. Though in Shaivism d Rudra form I.e. ferocious form is from Vedic Rudra.But, d lingam worship,yogic form is from Dravidian culture. I am proud of both my Vedic nd Dravidian ancestors. Our Vedic ancestors were truthful,confident,great warriors,alpha males,spiritual,Kings,honest.
@Electroweak Epoch then tell me why d Gurjars,Jatts r Shudras?? They have even more Central Asian DNA than many Brahmins nd they comes under OBC,ST. Nd look at Chirag Paswan who is a dalit leader. Does he look like a native with his blue eyes nd so called aryan features
Varna means colour, skin colour, it's clearly based on birth.
True
Dude, you're telling the exact opposite, let me tell you something, I hold views that many consider me as a centre rightist okay, and it's the right wing that led to the disproving of the 'aryan invasion Theory', the left loves the Aryan invasion theory and they kept it in the books and peddled it, the right has always been saying that we are the people of this land we didn't come from anywhere, British came up with that Theory for their divide and rule policy and the left nourished it, the right understands theres no 'Aryan', because we don't have the word 'aryan' in our languages, the closest one is Arya which means and noble man. Btw I'm also from the south. This video is full of BS and almost a political propaganda.
Aryan Theory has been proven True
In Rakhigarhi excavation site Two skeleton were founded by the excavation team of Indus valley site .
The female skeleton has more DNA similarities with " Iranian farmer-gatherers "
And Male skeleton DNA has more similarities to the " Irula tribal " group population in the Nilgiri mountains of kerala and Tamil Nadu .
And they did not find European gene called R1A1 gene in those skeletons founded in Rakhigarhi excavation site .
@@mscreationworks5787 fact check rakhigarhi site predates, "Aryan invasion/Aryan migration" time frame by 1000 years. The later part of rakhigarhi was done by 1900 BC, it was a part of pre Indus, at around 6500 BC and also part of mature Indus from 2500-1900 BC, "Aryan invasion" is claimed to be around 1500 BC, and it's not a new thing, there were many foreign Skeltons found in harrappa and pre Harappan era and they were buried in a different manner than the local ones, mesopotamian seals were also found, does that mean Indus valley was a part of mesopotamia? No it means they were trading,these skeletons were foreigners who had travelled to India as the civilisation was at its peak and offered better life, basically 'america of the past'. There's no archeological evidence whatsoever of Aryan migration. It was also their claim that chariots were brought in by "Aryans" until they found a battle horse chariot at sinauli which also predates Aryan migration or whatever the BS they try to peddle.
@@dotsanddash8083 Sinauli site is financed by BJP and Uttar Pradesh government .
The excavations in Sinauli were conducted by Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) in 2005-06 and in mid-2018.
The same Archaeological Survey of India . which tried to stop and Hide the DNA result of the Rakhigarhi and keezhadi excavation .
According to one of greatest Researcher Asko Parpola who specializes in Indus valley civilization and also a Finnish Indologist and Sindhologist , current professor emeritus of Indology and South Asian Studies at the University of Helsinki.
According to Asko Parpola these finds were Ox or Bull - pulled carts not horse - pulled "chariots " .
@@mscreationworks5787 I don't have time for your speculations, conspiracy theories, and political propaganda, battle chariots can't be pulled by ox and bulls 😂 have some sense. So much for your politics, why was sinauli excavation halted in 2006? .And the skeleton found at Rakhigarhi which dates back to 2500 BC mature Harappan era, didn't have the R1A1 gene, let's assume ASI "hid" it, why would they? The skeleton predates Aryan invasion by 1000 years, so sorry to break your bubble, you're on a witch hunt for a thing which never was. They have been beating this dead horse of a theory of Aryan invasion for a century now, and still it remains a theory and not a fact 😂,it was just another policy of the British to divide and rule.
Do we see variations in the gene pool today? Yes but those variations were introduced much later during the Indo Greek, Indo Bactrian empires, During the Mauryan, Kushan dynasty, when people of central Asia mingled with north western Indians. Aryan migration never happened.
@@dotsanddash8083 Than why did not scientists find European gene called R1A1 gene in those skeletons founded in Rakhigarhi excavation site of Indus valley .
But Brahmins and Higher caste people have higher percentage of R1A1 gene or European gene .
Yes, I totally trust Imtiaz Shams to tell me about Hinduism, Hindu culture, and who my ancestors were. That too with one reference by a guy who wrote a book. Not a peer-reviewed paper published in a credible journal, no no, a book. Heck, even I can publish a book today with my opinions; doesn't make it facts though. Imagine submitting this whole paper of your opinions based on one reference to your university professor. Automatic zero. Also anyone worth their weight in salt would know India, and in particular right-wing India, has ALWAYS discredited and denounced the Aryan Invasion Theory and quickly shut down any sort of paper on the subject. They have always said Aryans were indigenous to India. Anyone who knows Sanskrit would know Aryan is a title, meaning noble. It was conferred to anyone, and sometimes whole tribes, who believed in The Vedas and upheld Sanatana Dharma and its principles. Take a quick read of The Rigveda wherein specific tribes spanning from Afghanistan to SE Asia were identified as being Aryan or Mleccha ("other" "foreign" a "non-Aryan) for purposes of identifying who was a friend and who was a foe both politically and geographically. It was never a title conferred to someone based on their ethnicity, race, or even skin color, but rather their beliefs. The English f/cked up more than just our mindset apparently.
I see पुरुष of culture exist.
Yes , the so called RW hindu nationalist have always denied any Aryan invasion theory and have always believed that we were the once who created harrapan civilization and we look different because of geography , this leftists have now started to contradict themselves
@@pigeonlover935 I wouldn't say always. The early north indian hindu nationalists embraced the idea of a "North Indian Aryan ancestry".
@@spacemann1425 it was the Periyar who propagate it and to create enmity
There are three races in India. They are: the caucasian (much of northern and central India) ; the Dravidian ( south india - probably related to the negroids); and the mongloid ( northeast India). That was centuries ago. In all those centuries the intermarriages between the caucasian and Dravidian races have brought about the Indians we see today.
Although outdated concept, I can understand Caucasian and Mongoloid.. _but there is no race called dravidian_ you dimwit!
Bro I think U should know that how India got its name then U will get that Aryans are not only Hindus but people living in indus civilization were named as Hindus
Indus valley civilization has nothing to do with Aryans or their vedic culture.
@@vighig1903 pashupati seal in found in Indus valley cope hard now
Veda's and Ramayana tell you that Aryans were local and Lord Rama's family called their family as " Arya ".
No Aryans means noble, that's why Lord Rama's family was called as Arya.
@@niweshlekhak9646 Are you saying that Vedic people who were Aryan's called themselves " Gentlemen "
Just like Brahmin named Savarkar called himself veer Savarkar .
After being begged for mercy before British government
@@mscreationworks5787 No not Aryan, in sanstrik "Arya(R yay)" means noble. Not Aryan race.
Arya is a title. It means someone who is noble. The English royall f/cked us up by transcribing what they "thought" so many of our words meant, what our traditions meant, heck even what they "though" our religion is about. Anyone who follows The Vedas is automatically Aryan. It just means someone who is noble and subscribes to the dharmic path. That's literally it. Not some fancy Europeanizes blonde hair, blue eyes, excellent in everything because they exist , sort of idea.
@@niweshlekhak9646 Arya means Gentleman
Than why Gentleman divided society and humanity by dividing Humans into four categories .
And Make himself Almighty in caste system .
Infact this will unite Hindus .... We are one ...hence proved ....
As long as there are brahmins who consider others as untouchable and consider themselves as the supreme, there wont be any unification.
Yes
We all are one.
We all are Tamilians.
Come back to your roots
@Parshu108 youre lying. Most brahmins even now has the untouchable phobia. I dont spread lies mate. Your right wing does. And aryan theory has its back on evidence like these. So fuck your right wing
This video is to talk about the time even before Hinduism... Its talking about the first people who came from Africa and entered and flourished in indian subcontinent..
@@bitik9847 i think untouchability is now a days is even more prominent in South compared to the north India..
The Indo-Aryan migration is a historical fact and no amount of jingoistic whitewashing will repaint the true history. It is well documented in the common proto-linguistics, in the common threads of practise like sati and written in the tablets of time found all over the eurasian steppes.
Hindu never consider themselves Aryan.There is a arya(आर्य) which means man would carry highest value.you have a wrong impression about arya.you mixed it with aryan
Aryans are Aryas...why are you trying to propagate Hindutvawadi propaganda? Why can't you take the truth as truth? Spreading serious false stuffs... Only you exclusively invented the Aryans/ Aryas differentiation theory. Any proven data???
There is none.
@@barnaliadhikary9421 read Sanskrit bro
He said Hindu Nationalists, that's an ideology.
@@wit-hope4569 then who created caste system based on occupation
U may say it is not based on birth but it actually and practically based on birth
@@narenkarthik2469 Indian Constitution 1950 made it by birth.
Gov in 1950 had a chance to make it based on financial conditions and could have make it progressive but failed to do so.
Half Knowledge
So true
So show your full knowledge
@@dontbeafraidimhere5421 how much your knowledge?
Science doesn't lie but youtuber does.
@@rageofraj I said this to your mother, when she refused to accept that your DNA matches with Mine. 🤧
The cast system as we know it today has nothing to do with Hinduism
It has everything to do with Hinduism, because Brahmins ask first u r caste than your name
no sir hinduism is based on caste
We should all remeber Mr Ahmed here had no clue about India and its politics but its serves his agenda so he is happy to mis-inform here..
Not a single person knows or talks about Aryans in India yet here he mentioned it couple of times.
we all know why lol
I was also shocked by misinformation. The left always supported migration, invasion theory and Hindutvawaadee always opposed it. Yet, the narrator flipped the sides.
Those who considering him as Muslim, actually he is ex-muslim now
There are no ex-muslims he has become worse now he's a communist now both are same .
@Wake No. No . There aren't . Period ....
Really
@@manojkothwal3586 there are no ex mulsims, only sleeper cells
@@manojkothwal3586 वो एक्स मुस्लिम है
Thank you, King! Had tons of arguments with my brother about our ancestry. He constantly cites "Aryan" as our ancestry but it's so divisive and linked to colourism.
Lol! I have an Assamese friend who says he's descendant of Germans.
@@MrALenCar321 lol
ruclips.net/video/uSX4-DKUpn0/видео.html
Aryans are just imaginary items as Hinduism lived more before...the aryans are accused of destroying the indus civilization and establishing Hinduism but this is totally false because when Archeologists started their work on Indus civilization they found Vishnu murti which was about 2 lakh 50 thousand years old....So no Aryan invasion happened
@@ItsRaghav123-t6k oh kido they found pahupati and other few idols in indus but it doesn't mean they were hindus they just adapted gods from other civilization and other groups they adapted pashupati idol and named it shiva even kali was from another group(not indus valley) real hindu gods were indra agni varuna surya vayu naradar etc just like greeks
And 2lakh 50 thousand year old idol of vishnu? Lmfao If you ask Indian archaeologists when the first modern humans arrived in India, at least some of them are likely to put a date that is perhaps as early as 120,000 years ago. But if you ask a population geneticist…the answer is likely to be around 65,000 years or so ago.
Then there's you who's saying 2lakh 50 thousand years ago😂😂😂😂👌
You should read books by Nilesh niklanth oak to learn true concepts and stop making such half baked and false information.
I know right oak sir is a legend and most of indians don't even know people like him i first saw oak on srijan talks channel which is now renamed to sangam talks if im not mistaken
@Aditi Y,
Nilesh niklanth oak's theory has nothing to do with this. He is just trying to analyze human origin based on DNA research.
Its actually the other way.. oak is half baked and this is pure dna science..
Thanks for info I will check him now
The problem is any one comes with a mic and camera and start bashing on RUclips without tangible facts..
Self proclaimed professor intellectual.
The Iranians that you are saying about are actually the local people of ancient Iran. And Iranians are actually the Aryans who migrated to Iran
I've done quite a lot of genetic research and this R1a1 paternal haplogroup, which is related with the Indo Aryans is significantly present in today's South Indians (Tamils) as well...One would expect to find it exclusively in the higher castes of South India but what genetics have revealed is a whole lot different... This paternal marker is not just present in all castes but also in the tribal populations across South India...So the debate as to who is and who isn't of Indo Aryan descent is gets even more confusing
That's complete lies R1a1 is non-existent in Tamils
@@விஷ்ணு_கார்த்திக் You are so wrong...There is significant R1a1 in Tamil groups
R1a1 is found in:-
*>72% of Bengali Brahmins*
*>60% of Gujarati Lohanas*
*>67% of Sikhs&Afghans*
*>31% of Iyengar Tamil BRAHMINS*
The fact that Brahmins&North Indians have the highest frequency of R1a1 is damning proof of the fact that it's Aryan. If all of Indians had 50-70% R1a1 ancestry you may have a point. R1a1 is brahmin/Aryan DNA, plain&simple.
Yes, there is "significant" Aryan DNA in Tamil BRAHMINS, tell me something i don't know already.
@@விஷ்ணு_கார்த்திக்
Search
Genetics and archaeogenetics of South Asia
About Y haplogroup R1a
"It has also been found in several South Indian Dravidian-speaking tribals including the Kotas (41%) of Tamil Nadu,[78] Chenchu (26%) and Valmikis of Andhra Pradesh[59] as well as the Yadav and Kallar of Tamil Nadu suggesting that M17 is widespread in these southern Indians tribes"
@@dodoraptor8387Pov: you're south indian dravidian nigga 💀
The video is more like “look we found something that support our cause and theory let me rub it in ur face”
haha
80% team of this channel are muslims and christians -- 6:12
what do you expect?
but a quality propoganda i must admit.
@Yahweh Official Yaa.. its a standard propaganda but a very professional one. Its good because general people wont easily be able to read in between the lines and connect the dots.
Here is a "short" analysis of what he actually wants to say.
------------------------------------------------------------------
INDUS VALLEY CIVILIZATION
0:53 Aryans used as "political weapon" too by nationalist in Europe and America and in India --> see Hindus and Christians use it as political weapon (note - no mention of Islam)
2:04 Massive "Iranian" populations mixed with "(Indian) Hunter gatherers" and thus became the "Indus Valley Civilization" --> see, the original people of India came from Africa and then Iranian made the Indus Valley Civilization. No glory to the Hindus. All glory to the Iranians. And all hindus are actually Irianians.
2:20 Harrapa and Mohenjodaro - we found no relation to the Aryans --> see
1. the Christians don’t get the glory to make the Indus Valley Civilization.
2. Hindu nationalists are wrong to think that higher caste hindus built the Indus Valley Civilization 2:32
3. It was the Iranians as i already told you that just earlier
CONCLUSION: The glory of the Indus Valley Civilization from whom the Vedic Scriptures and all the knowledge came; the credit goes to the Iranians. There is nothing like the original Hindus.
---------------------------------------------------------------
ORIGINAL INDIANS
2:54 The Aryan Invasion of the British is proven to be wrong. --> see it was not the Christians who made India great.
3:28
ANI - Aryans (European) + Africans who migrated to India
ASI - Iranians + Africans migrated to India
see, there is nothing like the native Hindus in India. So, all the glory that you “Hindus” boast about is not yours in fact.
4:28 Later many people came in India like moguls and Europeans but these groups did not have their genes spread like the early Irianian farmers. --> see, although many people came to India they are genetically originally Irainian.
CONCLUSION: The original Indians are mainly Iranian. All glory of India is mainly courtesy of Iranians. There is nothing like the original Hindus.
----------------------------------------------------
The roots of the author of this book he is referring to, the bashing of the "hindu nationalists", downgrading the Christians in the name of Europeans, silent glorification of Islam etc. I can tell you more and go in a "real" depth of the deception he is making here.
His presentation is very sneaky. Its a job of a very sophisticated and professional organization with a lot of money and backing.
I suspect its an Islamist propaganda. Its very easy to dismantle/disprove but very difficult to see. But people simply cannot see it unless you use your brain which most people don’t while watching YT.
@@pranavjoshi9084 yes brother, you are absolutely right, your analysis are greater than this video, they don't wanna take Mahabharat and Ramayana or RigVeda as reference. Because they hate our Hindu scriptures and the actual Vedic people.
@@pranavjoshi9084 long and not useful comment. You didn't add any new information.
3:25
Do you have historic proof that women dressed that way?
Indian women are not as unholy as you portray them to be, or you want them to be, or you want them to think they are
yes. there are books. they mostly went topless with heavy ornaments and sometimes a cover, more optional. Can quote some if you are interested
@@guharup if u do some study …
U will know Indian traditional clothes are saree , lehengas etc
@@stanspaforabetterlife5058 what study? Bharhut statues from maurya and sunga periods clearly show what they wore. Its neither saree nor lehenga. Saree came in from the kushan period only, which also is quite old.
@@guharup fine .
But now it’s saree and lehengas .
@@stanspaforabetterlife5058 the video is not about now, its about history. Covered your face in a lehenga and lost the way?
U forget to mention r1a has the highest diversity in india. It is originated most likely in india. R1a and r1b are daughter haplogroup of r1. R1 is from R and haplogroup R descends from haplogroup F-M89 which is originated in india. These yamnaya dna was itself r1b and it originated in india.
If they would ve even migrated to indus valley why we not find any sudden cultural shift.
Haplogroup f originated in india. Haplogroup m and n (x chromosomal) also originated in india. This shows that india was orginal founder zone after out of africa migration where humanity 1st settled down and from india it went to other parts like europe and central asia. We find both cultural and linguistic evidence too.
So I'm very glad to see someone try present scientific results in an honest way. But there are a few inaccuracies that irk me.
1:02 "We tend often to think of History as what's written or recorded... but that's only 5000 years old." In the academic context the definition of history literally relies on written records. Anything before written records is prehistory.
2:55 How does this study disprove the Aryan Invasion Theory? I'm not implying AIT is correct, but according to the logic presented here the Aryans could have destroyed the Indus Valley Civilisation. You're starting with the assumption that IVC is Aryan - which it's not. Now run through the same segment without that assumption and you have't disproved AIT. Aryan invasion theory is disproved, but not for the reasons you've given. Aryan Migration Theory still holds true, obviously.
3:30 Graphics are wrong. The ASI and ANI are pretty much the same with the major difference being that ANI has Yamnaya admixture. It's not four different isolated populations, it's 3 mixed ones. ANI = ASI + Yamnaya, ANI being made up of two other ones - Southeast Asian hunter-gatherer and Iranian-related ancestry. ANI = North Indian Population + Aryan population makes no sense... like what's that, extra white North Indians??? Kashmiris?
4:00 Also misleading. Upper castes, particularly Brahmins, simply have more steppe pastoralist (Yamnaya) DNA. It's not necessarily ANI DNA... cause that would mean that everyone in North India is a Brahmin, which obviously isn't true.
1)Steppe absent among harappan and anatolian.
2)Steppe striking very high among Brahmin.
3)Steppe origin in yamnaya.
It's not so hard to concluded Brahmin forefathers were yamnaya. But Most north india non-brahmin have less steppe with 75-80% harappan.
@@xeonquantum3966 And your point is?
@@MultiSciGeek Sry I misunderstood your comment... You were right..
@KAUSHIK KUMAR brahmin mentioned in rig veda..
This is meaningless today .
There are no pure Aryans in India .No pure Dravidian either .
Exactly
actually classifying society on basis of aryan dravidian is bullshit,society shud be classified on rich and poor concept so that its fair
Well said my friend, we are all Homo Sapiens, there is no reason to discriminate
Question please: When first humans were living in Africa around 300,000 yrs ago ..
Africa, Gulf and India and other land masses, would probably were one big piece of land together at that time ?
If that’s so, the narrative completely takes a new/interesting turn, I guess.. ?
You're just proving the Right Wing point of view XDD ...Thank you tho!
The early Aryas certainly didn't evolve out of Africa.
Oh yeah that some arbitrary group is more “pure” than another arbitrary group and more deserving of things.
@@arbabk RW never said this in india... there claim is exact what this man proved in a video
@@arbabk 😂 they never said that
70,000 years ago, there were 7,000 of us living in Africa (after a Volcano explosion). There was no "Race", at that time.
We were all the same.
This is an excellent review!
Probably the first Indians, were the Andaman Island people, who moved there 50,000 years ago.
The Aryans could have culturally appropriated history of the Dravidians and other native people in ancient South Asia. My grandfather and few of his friends attended of one of their friend's wedding in 1956 in a small town in Pakistan Punjab and one of the local old man told them his life story of joining the Army in 1940 and then going to North Africa to fight Rommel Army in Libya. After 40 years he met one of old friend after long time who also attended that wedding and he was telling others that it is the story of his grandfather. So people take achievements of others and and claim as their own.
@ꅏꍟꍏꌚꍟ꒒ Many Dravidians adopted language and culture of the Aryans.I myself has L Y-Haplogroup DNA which is basically Dravidian haplogroup and I am Muslim Pakistani speaking Urdu and Sindhi, both are Indo-European languages, and living 50 miles from Indus River.
@Weasel caste system is now more similar in north india than in tamilnadu or kerala . indus valley was a dravidian civilization indeed . there are now barely any brahmins left in tamilnadu since most were kicked out to the shithole they came from which is north india
First of All it is impossible now a days to Test DNA as many n many ppl are getting mixed.
But few may hav preserve thr linegae.
Ths video is not scientific or right as it only tested few sample .india is having over 1 billion population.At least test 50cr sample 🤣🤣🤣🤣.
They didnt mention Ice age .
So whole video is Ab. FALSE
@@Sathish11SK all Indians are my brothers and sisters , love for tamil brothers from north india
Yes , the so called RW hindu nationalist have always denied any Aryan invasion theory and have always believed that we were the once who created harrapan civilization and we look different because of geography , this leftists have now started to contradict themselves
Bravo, how you and your team mixed the different groups and tribes together that's really marvelous. Excellent work
Nothing "marvelous" about this stupid amateur video.
This narrative is based on a total misconception that Aryans were from outside India. Neither Ramayana nor Mahabharata speaks about Aryans as outsiders. Arya is a word of respect. Brahmins never rode horses or even bore arms. It is nowhere said upper castes alone were fair. What was said was that some people were fair and some dark. Several great Rishis were not even Brahmins. Total misconception. Further, Sanskrut, the language developed in India entirely.
This guy is following too much western conception. He should read vedic history the anseers are all their.
Finally find someone who is not brainwashed yet🌞🎈🥳💯
I visited Harappa once, it's 40 kms from my hometown. It seems like some abandoned 19th century town
The sewers, symmetrical bricks don't seem like the work of some thousands of years old people
And I've heard mohenjodaro is even bigger...
Both are branches of Indus Valley civilization
They are very modern and impressive. The community was sharing everything, like in monasteries. They apparently died from paludism, once their river became almost dry, like a pond or a marsh, full of mosquitos.
Iam not dark skin but agree dark skin Indians were the indigenous Indians & harappan civilisation was the first before Indus value
@Isaac KAITHAYIL this is why India is still a developing country.
@R G The role that climate plays in genetics of skin color takes thousands of years with lots of isolation to become noticeable. People groups move much faster than this.
@Isaac KAITHAYIL Dravidians aren't Indo-Iranian they came from some steppe in the Western part of the Middle East and were related to the groups that later became the Semitic people.
@Syed Murtaza hey bro stop this mess you think whites will consider you white .. They will never so be happy and let others be...Unknown many people from USA who say they are white but are not fair .. human matters not complexion so brother take chill pill
Ahh no one in modern South Asia are only descended from Harappa civilization
One correction.. The central right-wing party, BJP is against this Aryan Invasion Theory.. They don't spread this theory but they discard it.. Its the South Indian regional parties from TN who propagate this theory and the central left wing party Congress support this whenever they sit in opposition..
one currection.
if i remember correctly , in madhya pradesh a stone tools as old as 350000 years old were found & out african theory has been pushed 70000 years more into past after new skeletons of modern humans were found
would love to learn more ( i know v r all homo sapiens ), it's interesting, I can only 'guess' the north is prob. from mid.east, the south from africa, prob. all from africa anyway, may be combined studies including DNA, archeology, etc. will enlighten us all, i thought the word ariya encompasses civilized, intellect and moral entities summed up as ' noble ', regardless as said, interesting. ( northern China has archeology findings of Europeans too )
Sorry to say, but you are using 2018 paper by David Reich, where as a new revision of the paper was published in 5 sept 2019 and Rakhigarhi DNA paper was published in Oct 2019.
I am proving your claims wrong here.
1. You claim: At 2:10 "massive Iranian population migrated to North of India who mixed with Indigenous Asian Hunter Gatherer community and built Indus Valley Civilisation"
Rebuttal: Study published says something different. Read paper here = doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.048
a) First farmers of the Fertile Crescent contributed little to no ancestry to later South Asians.
b) The ancestry which is called as Iranian-related splits from South Asia more than 12,000 years ago. Implying there was common ancestor who lived more than 12,000 years ago. Paper does not say that this ancestry came from Iranian side. David Reich said that it may be possible that the ancestor lived in South Asia rather than Iranian area. Read point 1 of his interview - tinyurl.com/y6k3jqn7
c) Rather paper shows that Indus people in the past were migrating to central asian sites of Gonur and Shahir-e-sokhta. Over there, the Indus people are found mixing with local of central asia. They are called as Indus Periphery Cline. See figure 2B of the paper, where IVC cline's ancestry profile is shown. The IVC cline DNA samples were 25% of the total samples found there. This indicates that significant amount of Indus population was migrating to those sites. Also skeletons were dated as old as 3300 BC meaning the mixing of DNA sample occurred much earlier than 3300 BC to reach that mixed ancestry profile. If you see the Iran/Turan ancestry profile, you see that every single local DNA sample have this Andemanese ancestry which you are calling Indigenous Asian Hunter gatherer.
d) The main point - IVC is the single/primary source of ancestry for South Asia - you missed to say. whee ANI is minimumm 71% IVC and ASI minimum 55% IVC.
2. Lets discuss Steppe ancestry component in present day Indians. You added this mumbo-jumbo of nationalism and High caste & U tried to give it a political swing. Let's try to be scientific okay? Let me show you published evidence from the 5 sept 2019 published supplementary material of all 246 groups of South Asia which are studied. Let's see in which period did the steppe ancestry mixed with South Asians. Let's see when did the high caste - such as Brahmin got steppe ancestry in them. Go to the link (tinyurl.com/yyhbvunn) and download "Tables S1 to S5" where the material is listed. It is excel spreadsheet.
Note: Out of 246 groups. 140 groups are samples and only 77 groups are dated.
- Go to Tab 5 - names S5 (246.modern.groups).
- Column A is name of the groups.
- Column P give you dates (both mean and interval) - Interval gives you upper limit and lower limit of the dates.
- Column E contains Yes/No if the group is Brahmin or not.
- Column AI to AK contains AHG (Andemanese), Indus periphery pool and Steppe components. They all sum up to 1.0
Now lets look at your claim of high class Brahmin to see when they had Steppe ancestry mix in them and what percentage and what is the time period. Because every sample had a different mix time so there is a interval for each group. and mean time in years BC is also given.
On average South Asians have 12.6 % steppe component. With Indo-European speakers with average of 14.3% and Dravidian language speakers with average of 7.7%
At 3:20 you made a false claim that Aryans entering India 3500BC. Where as David Reich himself said Steppe ancestry arrived between 1500-2000 BC. Lets see so called upper cast Brahmin.
Out of 246 groups only 11 Brahmin groups are tested. Out which only 5 are dated. I will copy the Steppe component from column AK and time period from column P
Bhumihar_Bihar
= 27.4% steppe & Mean of 714 BCE (1612 BCE - 200 CE) over period of 1,400 years
Brahmin_Tiwari
= 26.3 % steppe & Mean of 984 BCE (1467-501 BCE) over period of 900 years
Bhumihar_UP
= 23.9% steppe & Mean of 609 BCE (1630 BCE - 499 CE) over period of 2,100 years
Brahmin_UP
= 24.3% steppe & Mean of 488 BCE (1077 BCE - 130 CE) over period of 1,200 years
Brahmin_Vaidik
= 16.3% steppe & Mean of 1015 BCE (1394-636 BCE) over period of 700 years.
Now look there is no mass migration at all. The mixing is occurring over a period of 700 years to 2100 years. This gradual mixing does not bring language or replace languages.
Similarly in all groups there is NO Migration anywhere. There is only gradual mixing over 1000+ years period.
There only only 7 groups whose average date falls between 1500-2000 BC out of which (Dogra, GujratiC, Kuruba, Chakkiliyan, Adi_dravider, Malayan, Ulladan)
- There is not a single Brahmin group
- 5 groups are dravidian
- only 2 groups are Indo-European speakers -one is Kashmiri Dogra (22.2% steppe) and other is GujratiC (17.7% steppe)
Out of 77 dated groups - only 11% groups have steppe component 20% but less than 29.8%. Only
These percentages are also result of gradual mixing of 1000+ years period. There is NO mass migration or even a migration at all.
How do you explain Language replacement here? how can less than 15% average ancestry with GRADUAL mixing of over period of 1000+ years can replace a native language? RIPLogic
3. Seems like you do not know that as per the linguistic model. Indo-Iranian live together in Iranian plateau after which the alleged Aryan migrate to Indus region bringing Sanskrit. But there is no model of steppe migration bringing Sanskrit here. This is the second biggest Flaw.
a) Do you know that Uralic languages have a lot of borrowed words from Indo-Iranian languages. This is only one way borrowing. It is only possible if Indo-iranians migrated to west into Uralic areas and assimilated with them. Thus only one way borrowing happens.
b) How come all the common Indo-European deities (Total 19) only exists in Rigveda but not in any other IE language. The tally (out of 19): Vedic (19), Greek (9), Avestan (7), Germanic (7), Roman (4), Baltic (4) Slavic (3), Celtic (2), Hittites (1), Albanian (1).
see comment for more details on deities.
Northwest India is the homeland of Proto-Indo-European languages. First you answer above then I will provide more irrefutable linguistic and genetics proof (of origin of R2* in India and R1a* in India. and R1b* west to India - probably in central asia)
The following, for example, is an almost exhaustive list of common Indo-European deities found in the mythologies of more than one branch. Note that every single one of these deities is found in the Rigveda:
Dyaus Pitar (Vedic), Zeus Pater (Greek), Jupiter (Roman), Dei Patrous (Illyrian), Dievs (Baltic).
Uṣas (Vedic), Eos (Greek), Aurora (Roman), Aushrine (Baltic).
Varuṇa (Vedic), Odinn/Wodan (Germanic), Ouranous (Greek), Velinas (Baltic).
Asura (Vedic), Aesir (Germanic), Ahura (Avestan).
Marut (Vedic), Ares (Greek), Mars (Roman).
Parjanya (Vedic), Perkunas (Baltic), Perunu (Slavic), Fjorgyn (Germanic).
Traitana (Vedic), Thraetaona (Avestan), Triton (Greek).
Aryaman (Vedic), Airyaman (Avestan), Ariomanus/Eremon (Celtic).
Saramā/Sārameya (Vedic), Hermes (Greek).
Pūṣan, Paṇi (Vedic), Pan (Greek), Vanir (Germanic).
Rudra (Vedic), Ruglu (Slavic).
Danu (Vedic), Danu (Irish).
Indra (Vedic), Indra (Avestan), Inara (Hittite).
Śarvara (Vedic), Kerberos (Greek).
Śrī (Vedic), Ceres (Greek), Freyr/Freya (Germanic).
Bhaga (Vedic), Baga (Avestan), Bog (Slavic).
Apām Napāt (Vedic), Apām Napāt (Avestan), Neptunus (Roman), Nechtain (Celtic).
Ṛbhu (Vedic), Elbe (Germanic = English Elf).
Yama (Vedic), Yima (Avestan), Ymir (Germanic).
The tally (out of 19): Vedic (19), Greek (9), Avestan (7), Germanic (7), Roman (4), Baltic (4) Slavic (3), Celtic (2), Hittites (1), Albanian (1). And in all the deities which are shared by the Avesta, it is clear that the connection is to and through the Rigvedic deity: further, the Avesta represents a highly evolved, highly anthropomorphized and highly transformed state of religion and mythology, which shows very few connections with the natural phenomena that they represent, except through analogical comparison with the Rigveda.
@@rahulchawla6256 Really good information. Good work atleast someone is doing their primary research rather than reading off stuff from websites. Can you share information about R1a and R2 origin in India. Although I have seen Dr Niraj Rai and Dr Gyanendra Chaubey in public claiming that R1a in India has 60% more diversity than Europe and they said their new paper is coming soon about R1a origin in India. Are there any other papers already available?
@@gurnidarsingh2830 There are several papers which reveals that R1a is originated in India. The age of R1a is the OLDEST in India than in any other part of the world. please read Sharma et al to see the see ages.
1. Sharma et al - read here www.nature.com/articles/jhg20082
2. Sengupta et al - Read here www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1380230/
3. Thangaraj et al 2010 - can't seem to find the paper. will look later.
4. Kivisilt et al 2003 - origin in South or west asia
5. Sahoo et al 2006 - origin in south or west asia
6. Mirabal et al 2009 - origin in Northwest India or central asia
Niraj Rai himself in several videos claimed that India has 3-4 times more diversity of R1a than Europe and he said he is Certain about R1a origin in India and will be publising a paper soon based on DNA analysis of 10,000 people (the biggest number ever tested)
R2 rarely exist outside India. Please look for papers published. Sorry I don't have enough time to spend her.
Took a great time to type this....but thank you for such valuable information....I've took a screenshot of every word that you have typed.... This is such invaluable...❤❤
Bihar comes under east india. Also u guys believe a foreigner?? A foreigner will tell u abt ur ancestry wow 🙄🙄
You just picked some messed up facts and added some science. 😂
better *cooked up science
Coloniality is so deep rooted that they couldn’t find better name than - Think English
This speaker sure has a personal bias to his thinking. WOW! Insulting much?
Dude, you are EXCELLENT! This was summarized and presented with such clarity. It was superb.
Not really. Right Wing opposes Aryan invasion theory, the opposite of what he said. He passed of Varna system as Caste system, when Caste means Tribe/Jati. He is full of blatant lies.
You just watched the sweet lies of the left.
Yes , the so called RW hindu nationalist have always denied any Aryan invasion theory and have always believed that we were the once who created harrapan civilization and we look different because of geography , this leftists have now started to contradict themselves
@@AyushKumar-gs9nsgenetics is biological fact.
Do a genetic test of your first then u about your self .
Don't watch any political wing blindly
The sanskrit word is आर्य aarya which means decent or noble. There is no race called Aryan.
That's exactly right.
In Sunauli (Uttar Pradesh),a chariot was discovered, which is dated nearly 4000 years old(1900 Bce) that debunks Aryan Invasion Theory!
aryan migration theory ,was a theory ,made by the colonisers,to inject racial supremacy of their!
They couldn't digest,That Bharatiya (Indian) ,were actually an advanced civilization,which wrote AYURVEDA,YOGA, SPIRITUALITY, MEDITATION AND EVEN great Philosophical,Dance,music etc.
They made this, theory to make everyone believe,it was Aryans from Central asia,Who came with such things,not Indians.
ANI was used by Dravidian to create ideology and boost anti caste movement!
We need more such Natural History about the Indian Subcontinent!
Presenter:- I have done more than 5 months of research to do this presentation.
Random Viewer:- Bulls**t!!
Then this presenter had to be particularly incompetent and dum to have spent so much time researching and to get everything completely wrong. The Aryan invasion theory was promoted by the extreme leftz atheists and Marxists in India, not by Hindu Nationalists who have always debunked it as a British Empire lie designed to justify the racist myth britush were trying to establish that because they were white they had right to steal India's resources and misrule the country.
@@repealsection230forbigtech4
Have you research about the subject?
Or are you speaking because your emotions took over your thoughts.
@@opaaaaaaaaaaa You're projecting your own flaws of emotionalism and derision onto others. Did you do YOUR research and realize that this ignoray.mus (or deliberate lier) in this video projected complete falsehoods, before YOU made your self righteous and ridiculous comment? Obviously not. The irony is that you made yourself guilty of what you were mocking others for. But then that's typical of you isn't it?
@@repealsection230forbigtech4 Get a life.
Get educated.
Presenter : paid hindu phobic content given to me by anyi national
Viewers: Boss DK , we saw you color as soon as you spoke.
Actually U guys HAVE TO research MORE about india nd use western Refrences..because .90% are just against of india.