🎥 Join our RUclips members and patrons to unlock more than 170 exclusive videos: ruclips.net/channel/UCMmaBzfCCwZ2KqaBJjkj0fwjoin or patron: www.patreon.com/kingsandgenerals and Paypal www.paypal.com/paypalme/kingsandgenerals as well!
That's true of several "Old World"/Eastern Hemisphere societies. Cleopatra was closer in time to us than she was to the Pharaohs who built the pyramids. I'm sure there's an equivalent in China, but I'm not sure what it would be.
Neolithic/bronze age civilizations tended to last much longer than subsequent iron age ones. This happened in South Asia, but also in Levant and Europe. The shift was mainly due to the domestication of horse cca 3.000 BC, then apparition of chariots around 2.000 BC and radical changes in warfare brought by them.
As a Pakistani Hindu, seeing their pools, fire altars, Pashupati Seal, yogi terracottas, sculpture with tilak, that they used turmeric and had similar dishes…its wild. Theres much more to ancient history we dont know.
@@SonofIndia1999no the indo Aryans are the ancestors of pakistan northern India Nepal Bangladesh sri lanka. IVC is a Dravidian civilization the ancestors of southern india
@@llawliet57807 Just because the IVC possibly have spoken some dravidian doesn't mean they aren't the ancestors of current Northwest of India. Language family =/= genetics. The people there have descent from both IVC peoples and Indo-Aryans
The Indus Valley place names are relatively recent. ‘Mohenjo Daro” was a local name from much later local inhabitants. The name Mohenjo Daro translates into “Ghost Town” or “City of the Dead”.
Like Medina Azahara in Spain (City in ruins in Arabic) Didn't know the meaning until an Arabic speaking colleague asked me why did I say "City in Ruins"
There're also theories that it is "Mohan jo Daro," meaning "the mound of Mohan." Also, the common spelling is Mohen, not Mouan, in Sindhi Mu-an means dead, Mohen is no word. Mohen jo Daro would mean "The mound of Mohen" not "the mound of dead".
My ancestral home is 45 mins drive from Harappa site. Sometimes I wonder there might still be numerous smaller Indus Valley settlements buried in the periphery including my hometown. This was a very good video. Thank you.
Can you guys make a video on the Mahajanapadas, aka the first large cities that emerged in the northern part of the subcontinent after the fall of the Indus Valley civilization.
@RojaJaneman yup, i've seen it in some of their other videos and too, and here also the map at 2:05 looks intentionally altered. Most likely someone in their research or editing staff is either Pakistani and just a random muslim who has a India-hate boner
This was a good introduction to Indus valley civilization and you covered it well, would also love for you to look at the post Indus valley indo gangetic tribes leading to the mahajanapadas, it's genuinely fascinating history that most aren't aware.
I visited these sites when I was working in Pakistan - it seems we cannot read what little they left in writing (clay) which makes the Indus Valley Civilization very difficult to understand.
@@xerogue I Will believe the indian archaeological board which is filled with competent archeologist who have made recent discoveries like the presence of old temple under mosques then some Harry like u who is a youtuber commenter cosplaying as archeologist critic. Indian side of Indus is preserved and new sites in haryana like the rakhighiri have been discovered by the indian archeological team. On the other hand terrorism infested has been destroying anything that is not in conformity with islam.
@dhimankalita1690 India and Pakistan are equally corrupt and intolerant. Hindutvas are busy rewriting history on the Indian side to fit their political agenda.
@@arandomguy007Give me a break... Pakistan was never ever in picture for 5k yrs it was India & the main sites which are getting discovered are all in India on the Banks of Saraswati River now known as dysfunctional & dry riverbed of Ghaggar & Hakra channel. So kindly gets your facts right.
isnt it called the pasupathi seal? Pasupathi is an avatar of Shiva. Plus he's doing a high level yoga move which shiva is also known for as he is called the "Adiyogi" meaning ultimate yoga practitioner. The assosiation to cows and bulls also ties it to Shiva as his "Vahana"(vehicle) is a bull/cow
@@xerogue Dude stfu what nonsense are you saying 😭 The most ivc genes are in south india then in adivasi tribes in tribes in india. Modern Pakistanis and Northern indians have indo Aryan genes not ivc. What kind of text book they guys hand you over across the border 😭
@@xerogue The world indo Aryan comes from indo which means Indian and Aryans which were the central Asian steppes which migrated to south asia after ivc has ended. They have no relation with ivc you bufoon😭
@@BarlasofIndusand ? Majority of indus valley sites are in India. The biggest and oldest sites are in India.The Indus valley people the Dravidians are in India wtf are saying ?😭
@@BarlasofIndusIndia is named after the Indus , Indus Valley is a part of the oriental history . And the civilisation as well. The whole subcontinent is also considered Indian subcontinent by nearly everyone. I guess you are living under the rock
I really appreciate your citation list. It makes it much easier to trust the information in the videos as credible and also to read more about the subject
Make videos on Indian Empires like Maurya, Gupta, Maratha, Cholas, Pratiharas, Rashtrakutas, Chalukyas, Vardhanas, Palas, Sikhs, Vijaynagara. There are many other too but these are the Great ones.
Let's not just restrict history to this flag 🇮🇳 because other people claim a much older history. So at least put the flag of the land it all started on
@@Dankseid-o1u Pakistani: We are Arab/Turk/Persian/ Afghan, IVC is not ours. Indian: No you are Hindu descent lol Pakistani: You are right, We are Hindu descent and should celebrate IVC Indian: No you are Arab Quraysh lol Pakistani: you Indian are not happy in any situation smh 😒
@@huzaifaniaz7329 When it is convenient to Indians; "Pakistanis are Arabs its not your history lol", when it's not convenient to Indians; "Pakistanis are Indian descendents, you can't run from your history lol". Indians themselves are confused lol.
As the south asia is gradually getting more significant on global level. Its culture, stature, and history will also get prominent and known to all. Thanks for making an informative, unbiased ,and interesting video. Love from Lahore-Punjab, Pakistan.
@@arandomguy007 "Indus Valley Civilisation" isn't really limited just to Indus river. It's a misnomer based on 1920s discoveries only. This video mentioned Rakhigarhi, but didn't go deeper into it, and just showed the old restricted map.
India has more sites of the IV but 90% of all cultural artefacts and significant pieces of evidence for their culture, arts, and lifestyle have come from sites in Pakistan even tho Pakistan has fewer sites overall. Ancient Pakistan was the centre of the Indus valley.
The most fascinating of the Civilization is the town planning. Cities of Indus Valley were well planned- Right angled road, well built drainage system, Same residential buildings with Wells and hygiene, use of bricks of same size. They seemed to have an excellent knowledge of public architecture.
I live in Islamabad Pakistan very close to Taxila. Actually, near the capital city Islamabad in the hills, there are multiple remains of Indus civ and even gandhara civilizarion.
@@lordbloodraven9347 Who mentioned anything about the turks. Plus Hinduism is a relegion which was formed much later. Indus Civ did have idol gods. There is some evidence of that. But that doesn't mean it was hindu civilization. Keep your religious Nationalism out of Study of History. Not much is Known about IVC
Kya baat kar raha hai. Yeh saab Angrezo ne jhoot mooth ka banaya tareekh hai. Pehle yahan bandar kism ki nasl ke log rehte the jinhe kapde banana bhi nahi aata tha. Islam aane se pehle yahan ki tehzeeb African jaisi thi.
Why we need historical and mythological movies when we have a great youtube channel called Kings & Generals ? The animation quality and narration is getting better and better each year. Iam regular viewer of your videos. Thankyou. Gouri Sankar. K Please do more videos related to Indian subcontinent. I have enjoyed your Indian videos on Indus Valley Civilization, Mauryan Empire Under Emperor Ashoka, Gupta Empire, Indo Greek Kingdom, Indo Roman Trade etc. My suggestions are given below. 1. Pre historic peoples of Indian sub continent: Ancient Ancestral South Indians (AASI) Basal East Eurasians From East Africa. (Oldest Inhabitants Came Here 45,000 Years Ago.) 2. Mehrgarh Civilization ( Zagrosian Iranian Pastoralists Mixed With AASI) 3. Indus Valley Civilization: ( Zagrosian Iranian Hunters Mixed With AASI) A detailed exploration based on archeaology and genetics. 4. Sintastha Culture (Southern Russia - Kazhaksthan Border. Ancestors Of Indo Aryans, Indo Iranians & Indo Mittanis) 5. Bactria & Margiana Archarological Complex (Mix Of Anatolian Farmers, Iranian Neolithic Farmers & Caucasus Hunters - Gatherers) 6. Rig Vedic Period : A Detailed Study On Early Vedic Society. 7. Later Vedic Period : Decline Of Rig Vedic Society, Composing Of Yajur Veda, Sama Veda & Atharva Veda Along With 13 Upanishads. 8. Rise Of 16 Mahajanapadas: Also Known As Second Urbanisation. (Epics Like Ramayana, Mahabharata & Puranas Were Written In This Period. Rise and Spread Of Jainism & Buddhism. Expansion Of Hinduism In South India, Odissa & Bengal.) 9. Sangam Age Literature & Society In Tamizhakam (Kerala & Tamilnadu) 10. History Of Sri Lanka 11. Kalabra Invasion : Dark Period Of Tamil History Which Led To Fall Of Chola, Chera & Pandya Kingdoms. 12. Rise & Expansion Of Pallavas In Southern India : Split Between Satavahanas & Pallavas, Sanskrit & Maharashtri Prakrit Inscriptions In Palm Leaves & Copper Plates. Defeated Kalabras, Chalukyas & Cholas. Introduction Of Grantha Script For Tamil, Khmer, Thai, Bahasa Indonesian, Malay etc. Large Scale Migration Of Apara Shikha Brahmins To Tamizhakam Encouraged By Pallavas. Construction Of Agamic Temples & Revival Of Hinduism From Jain Kalabra Onslaught. 13. Medieval Cholas : Largest Maritime Naval Empire In India. 14. Kannauj Tripatriate Struggle Between Gurjara Prathiharas, Rashtrakutas & Palas. 15. Malik Kafur's Invasion Of Kanchi, Madurai, Sri Rangam, Trichy, Tanjavur & Chidambaram. 16. Vijayanagara Empire 17. Cochin - Zamorin Wars 18. Travancore Kingdom Under Marthanda Varma & Ramayyan Dalawa. 19. Siege Of Palakkad Fort By British (Carnatic Wars Between Tippu Sultan With French On One Side v/s Zamorin With British On Other Side.) 20. India's Contribution To Two World Wars. Thankyou 🙏
Amazing video on the IVC, aka the Sapta Sindhu Civilization. I hope to learn more about it in the future and am hopeful that seals, clay tablets, or stelae with longer inscriptions and written material will be uncovered from the sites. These discoveries could help us learn more about this enigmatic civilization.
Not many historians cover the sublime harappans many will appreciate this video. I hope this incredible video will inspire other content creators in teaching us more about a people lost by the vedic dark ages. One of the greatest sculptures of all time is called the dancing girl. The dancing girl a very prehistoric artifact shows a women who is actually a black women wide nose thick lips bushy hair and especially her tall slim lengthy arms and legs. The priest king and the dancing girl sculptures also have slanted eyes of asians. In earnest don't debauch the ancient harappan heritage by removing the obvious african and asian features in favor of the vedic people. Vedic sanskrit is part of the cluster of european languages english german greek persian etc.
@@arandomguy007 जो भिखारी अपने क्षेत्र की सभ्यता और सांस्कृतिक धरोहरों को नष्ट करने में लगे है , ऐसी संवेदनशील स्थानों पर शादी जैसे आयोजन करते है, उनका सिंधु घाटी सभ्यता पर कोई अधिकार नही । 😁
Indus Valley civilization is a shared heritage of both India and Pakistan. Instead of fighting people should rather focus on protecting the heritage sites.
Exactly. Protect the Pashupati seals, Lingas, Religious statues and people who worship animals and pipal trees. All of which were the religious practices of the Harappan Civilisation.
Problem is Pakistan is a nation formed simply because they are majority muslum, where only their religion has the right to exist, which rejects Indian philosophy and culture and follows a religion founded far away, thousands of years AFTER Indian civilization was founded.
Im sorry i simply cannot accept that. Pakistan was created on the rejection of indian and hindu culture. They cannot now suddenly lay claim to the indus valley civilization. Factually,it makes no sense. Pakistan is a modern creation with a culture borrowed from medieval central asia. They have nothing to do with the indus valley. I will accept yes,it is more important to preserve the heritage sites than fight over it
The reason why Indus River civillisation is misterios is because it was not a unified kingdom it was like The "Holly" "Roman" "Empire" of the early ancient world.
@Mmemememehu pakistan rejected thier civilization and hated thier culture and broke most of the artifacts tho. And now adopted a pedo worshipper as thier god.
As a Sindhi, I am very happy you covered the civilization that had existed within our lands, The Indus river is still as important to Pakistan as it was to people living in IVC back then. Various major landmarks of IVC lie in Sindh and many yet remain to be uncovered.
More Bronze Age video ideas: the Minoan civilization, the Hyksos, Ugarit, the Shutu, the Olmecs, the Caral-Supe, and the Phoenicians. I was going to ask about Gilgamesh but that would be for the Wizards and Warriors channel!
A great video from K&G! This has got to be one of yhe impartial analysis of IVC without the usual biases. Really hope that K&G int he near future makes videos on the Majanpadas and also the elusive proto Dravidian civlisation of southern India.
@@RoTelnCheese dosent matter most are in India the people of Indus valley were dravidians which are in India the oldest site bhirrana is also in India.
Many Pakistanis are claiming indus vally civilisation But pakistan has nothing to do with the ancient civilization of indus valley It was a prequel of vedic civilization
@நான்தான்-007 Even in that case, why should pakis larp? Pak has little connection to IVC either way If it was dravidian, then India (South) has more claim If it was proto-vedic, then also dharmic India has way more claim than abrahamic pakistan
Fun facts, out of some of the words rigveda uses for indus people is Mlechha, which comes literally from meluha, a term used in mesoptamian texts for indus people Some other words rigveda uses for them are anindra - indra less Anyavrata - someone with different (anya) vows (customs) Ayanjya - those who don't yajnya Shishandeva - those who worship lingam My favourite of the word rigveda used for indus people is नृषद् meaning someone who sits among humans. Meaning the types of creatures who are not humans but still sit among humans.
Fun facts , highest amount of ivc is found in brahmins like niyogi vadiki iyer iyenger tulu chitpawan. It's ivc itself who became Aryans by blending with another population
@@understanding.everything south indian uppercaste aren't native to south too they came from north only, they took part in brahminising the south North indians are on denial
@@Perseus-x4t No, Highest Amount of IVC is found in Irula tribe in south india, on the other hand Brahmins of UP have highest amount of R1A1 genes (aryan gene), Most Indians today have mixture of both.
See Yajnadevam’s videos on the recent decryption of the Indus Script, which is now determined to be based on the Sanskrit Language and the Hindu religion. I urge the author of this video to issue an updated video based on the new peer-reviewed information.
Spectacular thing about indus valley civilization is that modern people of indian subcontinent largest genetic component about 70% is from indus valley.
@@Anshulhe what is the source because from what I know The majority of genetic component in south asia is from true indians. The first people who migrated from African to south asia. Then comes indus valley who were Iranian neolithic farmers . Their genetic influence is strongest in Southern India. Then the indo Aryans who have the most influence in northern India and Pakistan Nepal Bangladesh Sri Lanka.
@@llawliet57807 Wrong, People who first migrated out of Africa 70,000 years back long but changed in fact the oldest remnant of pre harappan ancestry i.e so called indigenous AASI component itself contains 30% Neolithic component. And it's not Iranian Neolithic farmers but pre farming populations who settled in india from about 12,000 bce as shown by recent genetic analysis. Hence it's now believed that these populations intermixed with indigenous AASI populations about 5000 years before formation of Indus valley On the basis of which modern studies indicate even farming was independently developed. Now coming to average IVC person genetics it's about 80% Neolithic and 20% aasi. Whereas the modern population is about 65% IVC Neolithic, 20% aasi and 15% steppe indo european. And IVC women skeleton from rakhi garhi from about 4000 years ago, confirms high IVC continuation across indian populations from pakistan to Bangladesh, kashmir to srilanka. www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=frontline.thehindu.com/arts-and-culture/heritage/harappan-ancestryis-the-single-largest-source-population-for-almost-all-people-in-india-today/article32514104.ece&ved=2ahUKEwjSx7q3zIuJAxV4k68BHW-jPKUQFnoECB8QAQ&usg=AOvVaw1Wy9h6EDWOcatAeq4qAtOb
@llawliet57807 F haplogroup originates in Indian Subcontinent and 90% of all non African males have links to F haplogroup. R haplogroup originates between Indian Subcontinent & Iranian Plateau. Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam
@llawliet57807 F haplogroup originates in Indian Subcontinent and 90 % of all non African males have links to F haplogroup. R haplogroup originates in Indian Subcontinent and Iranian Plateau
I first learned about this civilization taking a course with Professor CC Lamberg-Karlovsky at Harvard (he at one point had been Benazir Bhutto's professor). Even though I mainly focused in Roman civilization in my degree, that was perhaps the best course I ever took in college.
Also Sindhu Saraswati civilization. Our books talk about the river saraswati. The archeological remains at Rakhigarhi and Kalibanga were along the course of river that disappeared. Update your knowledge.
Rigvedic and later Vedic texts are used to suggest identification of present-day rivers or ancient riverbeds. The River Sarasvati is said to lie between the Yamuna on the east and the Shatdru on the west in the Rigveda's Nadistuti Sukta (10.75); the river Sarasvati was a tributary of the Bhagirathi River, which was active until the 16th century, but is almost non-existent today.Majumdar, Dr. R.C., History of Ancient Bengal, First published 1971, Reprint 2005, pp. 2-3, Tulshi Prakashani, Kolkata
@@kanika0846 Please IVC has nothing to with Aryans Civilization, In Vedic age aryans were nomadic people they never build cities but they were rather destroying cities they came across. Indra is famous for conquering and destroying ports so Indra was given the epithet “Purandara”, which literally means “destroyer of forts” or "breaker of cities"
@@stalinsampras my friend 😂😂 Aryan invasion theory is debunked already. There were no Aryans. Secondly, you're talking about godly figures to prove your point? 😂 Isn't it ironic? Using "Aryans" to disconnect the "Aryans" from IVC? Books my friend books, read them
@@kanika0846 You are definitely in a bubble if you think Aryan Migration Theory is debunked 😂🤣, I only hear that from Hindu Nationalist who claim what you said. But Aryan Migration Theory is the Current Scientific Consensus taught all around the world in Various Departments from History, Archaeology to linguistics. Heck they are even taught in Indian Universities. How is it ironic again? In Rig Veda Aryans were nomadic and pastoral people, they literally did not build cities and there are literally no cities in Vedas, Vedas describe no such cities and fortifications but whereas ivc is literally filled with cities and towns there are 1500+ such places. If IVC was vedic why do we see no cities in vedas they do not talk about cities or towns and no talks on town planning. If IVC is vedic why do we find no horses in IVC, Where as horses were the most important animal in Vedas and Vedic age How Ironic that you are asking me to Read Books when you are literally parroting Fringe Hindu Nationalist Narrative that is Out of India Theory.
"Shared History of India and Pakistan" is not an accurate description . History of India (or Bharat) is more than 5,000 years old starting from Early Indus Valley Civilization and at its peak under Emperor Ashok Maurya (3rd Century BC aroundish) , the Mauryan Empire (Hindu[Chandragupta Maurya] to Buddhist [Ashoka Maurya]) spanned over modern day Afghanistan , Pakistan & India. This was all before Islam even existed. History of Pakistan starts from only 1947 because Pakistan is primarily just people of Indian religions who were forcefully (or not) converted into Islam & their descendants later demanding a nation of their own where Islam would be the main & (these days) only religion.
Yes, which means exactly what you attempt denying here - they are the same people as you and are simply of another religion. Still means you share origins and history.
@@عظيمشاھعبداللطيفڀٽائيthe people of ivc are not the same as modern day sindhis. Infact ivc gene composition is most similar with south indians rather than Pakistanis or north indians.
That Means Civilizations are actually based on religions,😂 That means if you change your religion so your father and mother will be changed also, You are truly a genius,.👏👏👏
My grandfather worked in India between 1961 and 1992. In the early sixties, he, my grandma and my father and brothers and sisters went to Lothal. I don't know exactly where that is. Anyway, they were playing by the banks of a creek and found lots and lots of little statues. My Grandpa took one of them to the city hall, not really knowing what to do, and told the staff there that they had found these small statues (terracotta) by the creek. They they didn't seem very interested and apparently nothing happened. My grandpa first kept that one statue, it was really tiny, and later felt bad and donated it to a museum in Paris. Probably not the ideal situation. But it's kind of weird also that the local government in Lothal didn't seem to care. To be honest, my grandpa thought they probably sent someone down to the creek and had the statues sold on the black market. It sad how archaeological things get dispersed.
I would suggest people watching this video to take it with pinch of salt. A Good number of inaccuracies are there about the History of IVC. Though it's a well done video.
No one takes everything on the internet in face value but saying this can make the hard work of the creator go to waste. Unless you are a professor or expert in the field, saying it has inaccuracies doesn’t sit well. If you provide examples, then it can be discussed
@@MarshaloftheEmpire So far, you seem to forget there still can be many uncovered sites in Pakistan... besides the majority of Indus river still runs in Pakistan.
@@عظيمشاھعبداللطيفڀٽائي Well you see India has more potential for bigger and more sites as per recent data. At the time of independence India had no sites while pakistan had all major and minor sites. Fast forward today india has around 1000 of total ivc sites out of 1400 also has the oldest and biggest. Also recently discoveries in india has led archaeologist to beleive that indus valley has no epicentre. It was multiple centre civilization. Indus river being only one of them others are in Indian state of Haryana Rajasthan and Gujarat. There are also more sites undergoing Survey in Indian state of Haryana than whole pakistan lol
@@عظيمشاھعبداللطيفڀٽائي You do realise that the existence of the Pakistani state in the region of the Indus valley is merely an outcome of religious demography which favoured the Muslim league right? If Muslims had been the majority in Maharashtra then Pakistan would be formed there, would that make them Marathas now? Lol
my parents' hometown is 30 mins from harappa, it's weird to think that we're from one of the first centres of civilisation. I've been to see the ruins and it's fairly humbling to see how little remains of once was a great civilisation however also fascinating that anything still exists from such an ancient place. You can see lots of pottery found from the area too which are in good condition and there's a creepy skeleton on display
Indo Aryans came from Southern Russia Yajurveda 13/37, "O wise men, learn from the sages of old, who are hospitable, like charioteers who harness their horses, who are well controlled by the skilled, and who have seated themselves on the seat of justice." Here the Vedas ask to learn from the ancient sages, that is, there were ancient human civilizations when the Vedas were written. Then I saw who were charioteers, horsemen. As we know, Ratharohana, i.e. the chariots was invented long after human civilization The oldest known chariots have been found in burials of the Sintashta culture in modern-day Chelyabinsk Oblast, Russia, dated to c. 1950-1880 BCE
Sinauli, India had chariots at the same time as Sintashta. Sinauli is one of the earliest archaeological sites in the Indian subcontinent that provides evidence of chariots and royal burials with warfare elements during the Ochre Coloured Pottery (OCP) and Copper Hoard culture in the Ganga-Yamuna doab, more than 4,000 years ago. The material culture recovered at Sinauli indicates that the Sinaulians were involved in warfare activities. The antiquities recovered show a high degree of sophistication in wood and copper craftsmanship. Eight burials have been excavated so far. Among them was a unique royal burial with a copper-decorated coffin with legs, and a lid that featured high-relief carvings of anthropomorphic figures. These figures wore headgear with two horns and a Ficus religiosa (sacred fig tree) at the center. The figures, besides having detailed faces, were depicted with broad shoulders and torsos. This burial also contained two chariots, a copper pot, a helmet, two stick tops, a copper channel, a copper-decorated whip, gold-steatite beads, and pottery, suggesting the individual was of royal status, possibly a chief or clan leader. The discovery of three full-sized chariots in these royal burials suggests warfare took place in the region. The chariot wheels were decorated with three rows of copper triangles radiating from the center. This discovery indicates that Indians were using chariots, helmets, and swords in warfare more than 4,000 years ago. Additionally, the recovered items include antenna swords with wooden hilts and copper spiral wiring
@@Kalki0025 The distance between these two place (Chelyabinsk and Sinauli) is over 4400-5600 km even on todays roads, which is huge. and takes 40+ days of walking time without stopping, to make it, so with 8 hour walk per day it takes 122 days or longer. Chariotry could have developed simultanously as well... Or there could have been a civilization that domesticated horses, and spread fast with this military advantage. But even then 100-200 years feels really fast to get this distance in actual ways of domestication, so i feel simultanous discovery is more reasonable...
The Indus Valley Civilization was originally started by the native Dravidians (Ancestors of the Tamils, Telegus, and Kannigas) and flourished until the invasion of the Aryans.
The original dravidians speakers were light skinned. The Darkies in south india have very little dravidian blood despite speaking dravidian languages. It is like African Americans speaking the english language It was not their native language in the first place. In short, South Indians have only a little Dravidian blood.
@@theawesomeman9821 my friend Aryan invasion theory is just fake , indus valley civilization wasn't destroyed by Aryan attack , most of historian believe it was natural cause of its end
Dravidian people migrated from ancient Iran. These proto-Iranian farmers Dravidianized ancient India and also influenced Hinduism or animistic religions that existed alongside the hunter-gatherer populations there The impact of Dravidian migration on the region was possibly more significant than later Aryan migration to southern India. Dravidians may have displaced the Andamanese tribes. Old Tamil shows similarities with the Elamite language.
The maps need a lot of corrections. Rakhigarhi is part of the IVC. The Indus Delta used to be further East into the Rann of Kutch (it used to until 1890s) and Bay of Cambay. Present day Gujrat used to be an island and Swamp land (like Florida). Ghagra used to flow parallel to the Indus along the channel of present day Luni. The region was greener.
@libshastra exactly!! finally I found a comment on this Too many Indians in the comments are like "saar wow thanks for vid" Instead of criticizing and fact checking the video for deleted a huge chunk of the IVC area. I would bet that someone in the research or editing team is an inbred-paki
@@cyberverse9141 Your History starts from a mere 70+ years but this dates more than 5k. Plus more of bharat history before indus valley, inscribed in Vedas. Our Indian history is divided into eras One unfortunately after muslim inavsions. And others before that. And yes modern day Pakistan is doing utmost to save the culture of Bharat👍
@@ridingwithsoumo2710 based on what? 🤣 did Punjab, Sindh, Balochistan, Kashmir, Kpk fell from the sky in 1947 😂 These Pakistani provinces have history older than all provinces of India 🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰
Pakistanis like Palestinians changed their identity. But genetically the Pakistanis are the natives and descendants of the Indus valley civilization. @@ridingwithsoumo2710
Land of Punjab, Sindh, KPK, Balochistan is now called Pakistan. The history on that land belongs to Pakistanis. It is not bihari or UP walas history. Be proud of your bihari or UP heritage.
@@stangerdanger7252 Surely you haven't understood what i wrote in my initial statement. Anything pre-1947 has nothing to with PK, you may claim post-1947 history. Btw, just as PK was created from thin air in 1947, so eventually it will vanish in thin air in future. Even PK name was first coined in 1930s, which is not even a blip in the long Indian history.
@@hamzakhattak8309 Just a small example for delusional or less-read Pakistanis, your loving political party which created PK, it's full name was 'All India Muslim league' established 1906. So, you you see India existed before 1947. And i agree you 'converted arab slaves' are occupying 90% of Indus since 1947.
@@rupendra79 So Bangladesh which formed on 1971 has no relation to its land before 1971? These Bangladeshi came out of on 1971 ? Modern day benglis have 100% right on their land and history of 1000s of years. Stop stealing history of other people, your history is confined to bihar and UP.
1. 15:40 - Really curious to know which year this map is from when India and Burma are part of British empire but Pakistan is a separate entity... 2. Overall a good video but you need to update theory of decline about IVC. New research and findings suggest that the IVC was actually more concentrated towards the Ghagra Hakkar river system (aka Saraswati) which eventually dried up and therefore made the people migrate towards Gangetic planes. This is based on the finding that majority of IVC sites are based around Ghagra Hakkar not Indus river i.e. around 2/3 of the total sites found so far. This also goes along with the mention of the river Saraswati in Rig Veda in its prime, thereby, indicating that the IVC itself was the Vedic civilization and it has existed much before the proposed 3500 BC since the river that vedas talks about supposedly started drying up around after 4000 BC.
Modern historians are changing the way they look at the history of South Asia wherein ancient Pakistani history (which evolved distinct to the Indian lands history) is being given its own credit and context. Over the next decade you can expect to see this approach become more commonplace as Pakistanis have started to value their own history. And secondly, even tho India has more IV sites than Pakistan, 90% of all cultural artefacts and evidence of IV culture comes from the sites in Pakistan. This is evidence enough for historians to suggest that Pakistan was the cultural and historical centre of the Indus Valley, and the sites in India were merely extensions to the actual important sites that are in Pakistan. This is why many historians believe either Harrapa or Mohenjo Daro to be the capitals of the civilisation and not any Indian site. The IV also extended into Afghanistan and Iran. Pakistan is the IV centre. The culture and civilisation centred around here. Plus over the past decade or so Pakistan has made no progress in excavating new sites - and I’m sure if Pakistan poured resources into this it would easily have more sites or larger quantity and quality. All in all it’s irrefutable that the IVC is mainly ancient Pakistani history, and as time goes on and more and more historians start accrediting ancient Pakistani history as ancient Pakistani history, we’ll see this perspective become more commonplace.
@@BananaConnoisseur my dear bheemte, to decipher a script, you need some text, long texts to match the context. But in case of IVC there is only 1 slab of 1 line. You can never decipher it! Got it mr gyaanchand?
@@Zecos 😂😂 you exposed yourself. "Now Pakistanis have started to accept their history" well, I'm so glad they now know that they're not sheikhs 😂😂 not Arabs, not turks, but INDIAN!
@@kanika0846 Puhhjeet my son, if you believe the IVC to be Vedic then its script should match to an Indo-Aryan script like Sanskrit, right? But it doesn’t, therefore it’s not Vedic! This is purely from a linguistic standpoint, we’re not even touching genetic data or archaeology. I’ll award you a bronze medal since you tried really hard🥉
@@AyushDew7 with you? Who tf are you to claim Indus Civilization? You belong to Ganga, we are the sons of the indus valley. It's civilization and history belongs to us. Just look at the region of indus, not even 10% of your country comprise of Indus. Only north western part of your country relates with us. Otherwise your nation is totally different from us. You belong to ganga, we belong to indus.
@@hariskiani9601 kid genetically & culturally you have no connections with Indus valley civilization they didn't have any Aryan dna in them but Pakistanis have almost 30% Aryan genes. Genetically people of south india, gujrat, and Middle caste people of central India are closest to IVC because later after flood they migrated to coastal parts of India. You guys are living there doesn't mean your ancestors are from ivc
We, Indians, are the living continuation of the Indus Valley civilisation. We are the Indus Valley people. Don't bring in Pakistan into this matter, as it is only 75 yrs old, simply because Mohenjo daro and Harappa happens to be in modern day Pakistan. The Pakistani people are mixed central Asian, persian and Turkic islamic descent ( except may be the people of Punjab, and Sind), and have nothing to do with Indus Valley Civilisation. They are relatively recent muslim immigrants, who have displaced the Hindu population of the place eastwards, in the last 800 years of Islamic rule of India. We, Hindus, living in India, are the original Indus Valley people.
Lol You are trying to say that majority punjabis and sindhi who make 70 percent of Pakistan's population are not decedent of the this land and came from somewhere else and a hindu living in bagal and asam or kerla or Goa or somewhere else in india thousans of miles away is actual person of this land just because he is hindu??
@Farooq_Tv exactly. That is what population displacement is. It happened to the Indus valley people when so called Aryans came from Northwest. It happened again with the arrival of muslim Turks and Aghans after Mamud of Ghazni's conquest of Multan, Punjab and Sind reinforced further after annexation by Mohd of Ghor ( in fact, colonisation started from the time of Bin Qasim in the 8th century). Resident hindu population was exterminated just as it is being done today in Pakistan and Bangladesh. Those who survived, fled eastward or southwards.
@@arijitmukherjee1719 Genetically, there are more Bengali and Punjabi Muslims than Hindus or others. Every tribe that exists in Hinduism also exists among Muslims, sharing the same DNA, complexion, and origins-only the religions differ. This has been proven multiple times. The only distinct group in Pakistan may be the Pashtuns. If we combine India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and the surrounding region, there would be more Muslims than Hindus. So, who truly owns this land? We belong here, and no attempts by governments to kill or displace us will succeed.
@@CliffCardirelax. The only country to use nukes offensively is the US. Pakistanis and Indians have great restraint considering how much hate there is.
Genetically Dravidian language speaking South Indian agricultural groups such as Velamas,, Reddys, Thiyyas, Vellalars show the most proximity to ancient Indus Valley DNA. However there is a concerted effort to appropriate this history by Pakistani and even North Indian nationalists. Truth cannot be hidden.
NO, these Stupid theories don't even have anthropological evidence. First of all, learn that Dravidian itself is an Hypothetical reconstructed Language family. Meaning There is NO Definitive evidence for it. Nobody is trying dissort History
Genetically South Indian agricultural groups such as Reddys and Velamas show the most proximity to ancient IVC DNA. There are IVC DNA samples which are nearly identical to Reddys. Chief ministers Revanth Reddy and Jagan Reddy of Telangana and Andhra respectively are two of the most famous from this group.
@@BarlasofIndusThere are sino-tibetans like in Northeast India Cause India is a artificial project made by British and all thanks to British The more you realize the more partition such as Bangladesh makes sanse
Thank you for covering ancient history of my country Pakistan. People say our history is only 70 years long. When our civilization has been the most ancient one
I reccomend you to read "The chalice and the blade" by Riane Eisler. Even if some of what it is said in the book is nowadays outdated, due to the fact it was written 40 years ago, I think it brings some really interesting points of reflexion on this ancien civ. Keep up the good work.
Genetically South Indian farmers such as Telugu Reddys and Velamas are the real descendants of Indus Valley. There are IVC periphery DNA samples which are nearly identical to Reddys. Chief ministers Revanth Reddy and Jagan Reddy of Telangana and Andhra respectively are two of the most famous from this group.
The DNA of a Male skeleton founded in Indus valley site of Rakhigarhi . Which was ( Classified as '" I4411'' ) shows affinity with present-day South Indian tribal populations , most notably the " Irula Tribal group " population in the Nilgiri Mountains of kerala and Tamil Nadu . A total of 61 skeletons were found till 2016
@ulrichkristensen4087 Bro , First understand that Ancient Iranians and Indo European language Steppe pastoralists were different group . But before entering Indian Subcontinent Steppe pastoralists stayed at Iranian lands and started to adopt their names like " Arya " even Religious & cultural heritage That's , why Anicent Iranian Religious book called " Avesta " has close similarities with Rigveda
This comment section reaks with whatsapp uni graduates and the amount of kanging by pajeets is insane😭😭 Saraswati river and other made up sites, this whole we waz indus saar propaganda is getting bigger in india and the amount of these nallay that believe in it is even crazier
🎥 Join our RUclips members and patrons to unlock more than 170 exclusive videos: ruclips.net/channel/UCMmaBzfCCwZ2KqaBJjkj0fwjoin or patron: www.patreon.com/kingsandgenerals and Paypal www.paypal.com/paypalme/kingsandgenerals as well!
Thank-you for covering the Indus Valley civilization. It is to the Subcontinent what Ancient Greece was to Europe.
Thumbnail is wrong
The civilisation is extends as far east as Meerut, Uttar Pradesh India.
Chariots were also found in Sinauli.
At 11:20, the dialogue is almost exactly the same as the first few lyrics of Iron Maiden's "Ghost of the Navigator". Is this intentional?
@@joeschmoe3420 yep
Why is there no mention of the Dravidian peoples and their origins
20 minutes of documentary, and no mention of aliens. This isn't what the History Channel taught me.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Indus Civilization's ancestry can be tracked back to nomadic wolves. Mother wolf 🐺🐺🐺
@@TG_MOGATEAM What?!
Watching the decline of educational channels like History Channel and TLC really pissed me off.
No its actually Nomadic Dolphins, they used to have Legs before they transformed into sea creatures
It's fascinating that the difference between early indus and late Indus is longer than the difference between time of jesus and modern day
That's true of several "Old World"/Eastern Hemisphere societies. Cleopatra was closer in time to us than she was to the Pharaohs who built the pyramids. I'm sure there's an equivalent in China, but I'm not sure what it would be.
That's true of even T.Rex who lived closer to us than earliest dinosaurs in its timeline. Mind boggling stuff!
Neolithic/bronze age civilizations tended to last much longer than subsequent iron age ones. This happened in South Asia, but also in Levant and Europe. The shift was mainly due to the domestication of horse cca 3.000 BC, then apparition of chariots around 2.000 BC and radical changes in warfare brought by them.
Often Iranians use the term "Aryans" to promote themselves
@@Adityabikramnayak actually, there are some Europeans who have wrongly appropriated the term. You may have heard of them, they're called NAZIs.
As a Pakistani Hindu, seeing their pools, fire altars, Pashupati Seal, yogi terracottas, sculpture with tilak, that they used turmeric and had similar dishes…its wild. Theres much more to ancient history we dont know.
They are our ancestors
Whole srilanka india pakistan bangladesh nepal Afghanistan comes from here
Who they?@@SonofIndia1999
@@SonofIndia1999no the indo Aryans are the ancestors of pakistan northern India Nepal Bangladesh sri lanka.
IVC is a Dravidian civilization the ancestors of southern india
@@SonofIndia1999 here come the hindutva fanatics
@@llawliet57807 Just because the IVC possibly have spoken some dravidian doesn't mean they aren't the ancestors of current Northwest of India. Language family =/= genetics. The people there have descent from both IVC peoples and Indo-Aryans
The Indus Valley place names are relatively recent. ‘Mohenjo Daro” was a local name from much later local inhabitants. The name Mohenjo Daro translates into “Ghost Town” or “City of the Dead”.
Like Medina Azahara in Spain (City in ruins in Arabic)
Didn't know the meaning until an Arabic speaking colleague asked me why did I say "City in Ruins"
Mound of the Dead
cool thx 4 that info!
It was and still is known as the mound of the dead by the locals as in the site itself
There're also theories that it is "Mohan jo Daro," meaning "the mound of Mohan."
Also, the common spelling is Mohen, not Mouan, in Sindhi Mu-an means dead, Mohen is no word. Mohen jo Daro would mean "The mound of Mohen" not "the mound of dead".
I always like to see content not often covered by traditional American or other Western sources. Thank you for your hard work!
Yea actually true Aryan were nothing like mentioned by ad**f hi**er.
Yes, india the quality of western documentaries is unparalleled and glad other parts of tye world are getting attention.
My ancestral home is 45 mins drive from Harappa site. Sometimes I wonder there might still be numerous smaller Indus Valley settlements buried in the periphery including my hometown. This was a very good video. Thank you.
Tou tu Hindu bandarron ki basti ke paas rehta hai😂😂
I'll be teaching Indus Valley Civiliztion Next week, the timing of this video is awesome!
Should add Saraswati-Indus .
It’s great that such topics are being taught now. Good luck.
@@Pharaohof21stcenturyNo such thing exists.
@@Mmjk14751 Then come to haryana
@@Mmjk14751in your dreams
Can you guys make a video on the Mahajanapadas, aka the first large cities that emerged in the northern part of the subcontinent after the fall of the Indus Valley civilization.
Vedic period 😍
Mahajanapadas were comprised of republic also
* early democracy*
@RojaJaneman yup, i've seen it in some of their other videos and too, and here also the map at 2:05 looks intentionally altered. Most likely someone in their research or editing staff is either Pakistani and just a random muslim who has a India-hate boner
YEEEEE!
Check Epimetheus(mahajanpadas)
Spectacular! Love the Bronze Age (and various cultures) content. Keep them coming!
This was a good introduction to Indus valley civilization and you covered it well, would also love for you to look at the post Indus valley indo gangetic tribes leading to the mahajanapadas, it's genuinely fascinating history that most aren't aware.
Would deffo get behind that!!
I visited these sites when I was working in Pakistan - it seems we cannot read what little they left in writing (clay) which makes the Indus Valley Civilization very difficult to understand.
@@xerogue I Will believe the indian archaeological board which is filled with competent archeologist who have made recent discoveries like the presence of old temple under mosques then some Harry like u who is a youtuber commenter cosplaying as archeologist critic. Indian side of Indus is preserved and new sites in haryana like the rakhighiri have been discovered by the indian archeological team.
On the other hand terrorism infested has been destroying anything that is not in conformity with islam.
@@dhimankalita1690yeah as a Muslim we should never be violence towards non muslim. But in reality some people loves sowing chaos
@@dhimankalita1690the birthplace and home of indus Valley civilization is in pakistan not India
@dhimankalita1690 India and Pakistan are equally corrupt and intolerant. Hindutvas are busy rewriting history on the Indian side to fit their political agenda.
@@arandomguy007Give me a break... Pakistan was never ever in picture for 5k yrs it was India & the main sites which are getting discovered are all in India on the Banks of Saraswati River now known as dysfunctional & dry riverbed of Ghaggar & Hakra channel. So kindly gets your facts right.
Superb video. Will you make a video on Hindu & Buddhist heritage of Afghanistan?
Great suggestion! The Zoroastrian, Buddhist, and Hindu heritage of Afghanistan is a fascinating topic that is often overlooked.
Why do you need that lol? Want to break the remaining heritage that left.
@@chillandrelax3783 no dear. I'm not like some hindutva people who want to do away with the Mughal heritage of India.
@@muazzamshaikh2049There's a reason extremists like the Talibs want to destroy every ancient Hindu/Buddhist/Zorostriqn artifact there is.
@@muazzamshaikh2049 The Mughals are not our heritage. They are outsider tyrants just like the British.
isnt it called the pasupathi seal? Pasupathi is an avatar of Shiva. Plus he's doing a high level yoga move which shiva is also known for as he is called the "Adiyogi" meaning ultimate yoga practitioner. The assosiation to cows and bulls also ties it to Shiva as his "Vahana"(vehicle) is a bull/cow
He doesn't know anything Shiva is the oldest god in our dharma but he has lot's of name's adiyogi, Mahesh, Shanker etc he's the first one to do yoga
Shiva was the inventor of yoga
@@MyPunksta and who told you that? Sadguru? 😀
Living in dreams sir
@@kusali11Sadhguru also say it's satyuga😂
The Indus River often gets short-shrift after Mesopotamia and the Nile civilization. It's good to see K&G working to undo some of that.
@@xerogue
Who's we 😭😭
@@xerogue
You are an indo Aryan 😭 your more closer to a bihari or a Bengali than the people of indus valley
@@xerogue
Dude stfu what nonsense are you saying 😭
The most ivc genes are in south india then in adivasi tribes in tribes in india.
Modern Pakistanis and Northern indians have indo Aryan genes not ivc.
What kind of text book they guys hand you over across the border 😭
@@xerogue
The world indo Aryan comes from indo which means Indian and Aryans which were the central Asian steppes which migrated to south asia after ivc has ended.
They have no relation with ivc you bufoon😭
@llawliet57807 if you are from ivc then why are you so far down south now? What did the Aryans do to you people?
I'm from India..
I Thank You from the bottom of my heart for covering my History.
its the indus valley not the gangetic valley lol
@@BarlasofIndusand ? Majority of indus valley sites are in India. The biggest and oldest sites are in India.The Indus valley people the Dravidians are in India wtf are saying ?😭
@@BarlasofIndusIndia is named after the Indus , Indus Valley is a part of the oriental history . And the civilisation as well. The whole subcontinent is also considered Indian subcontinent by nearly everyone. I guess you are living under the rock
Yes i agree @@shilpikvs2009
Bhai India Pakistan share history stop fighting for the love of God(s)
I really appreciate your citation list. It makes it much easier to trust the information in the videos as credible and also to read more about the subject
Thanks for checking it out!
It’s crazy how most channels won’t do that kudos to you K&G
The day King and Generals makes a documentary on Gupta Empire I will start my history major course
It’s already done; it’s for members only.
@@Shahanshah.Shahin Thanks for letting me know mate.
Dislike the Guptas🇿🇦
@KonradvonHotzendorf He is talking about an ancient empire 🤦
@@akhripasta2670 😂 😂
Make videos on Indian Empires like Maurya, Gupta, Maratha, Cholas, Pratiharas, Rashtrakutas, Chalukyas, Vardhanas, Palas, Sikhs, Vijaynagara. There are many other too but these are the Great ones.
Only mauryas nandas guptas kushan and cholas were great
They already have a video about the Sikhs, and I think they have others about the Mauryan empire
Kakatiyas,satavahanas,Reddy kingdom etc as well
@@midfielderlounge2592so were kakatiyas, satavahanas etc
how about mughal empire
I am from sindh and I am proud Sindhi
Thank you for covering my history
Lots of Love from sindh ❤
Lol Pakjeet You are Arab Turk not Sindhi
@@S.D286 ????
@@S.D286arab and turks are two different races. Pick one
@@user-Rayyan123Arab+Turk=Araturk
@@S.D286A bihari/UP/Mp paje3t calling a sindhi outsider 😂😂😂😂 joke of century
Indian Civilization is fascinating. From the Harappans to the Modern Republic 🇮🇳
Let's not just restrict history to this flag 🇮🇳 because other people claim a much older history. So at least put the flag of the land it all started on
@@RandomzzOfficial Arabian desert cult followers fake all*h worshipers p*rkis 🤣🔥 - You have no claim over Indus valley civilization who 🕉🚩🔥
80% of Indus Valley is in modern day Pakistan.
@@LucioRosetti pakistan is an artificial modern colonial project where the colonialists are muslims
@@LucioRosettiit's still called as ancient India
I admire your channel a lot for the quality and efforts. Please do more high quality videos on Indian history 😍
Thank you for covering our history, was not expecting it
Regards from Pakistan
bro you are quraysh, this is not your history.
@@Dankseid-o1u Pakistani: We are Arab/Turk/Persian/ Afghan, IVC is not ours.
Indian: No you are Hindu descent lol
Pakistani: You are right, We are Hindu descent and should celebrate IVC
Indian: No you are Arab Quraysh lol
Pakistani: you Indian are not happy in any situation smh 😒
*Our history lol
@@huzaifaniaz7329 When it is convenient to Indians; "Pakistanis are Arabs its not your history lol",
when it's not convenient to Indians; "Pakistanis are Indian descendents, you can't run from your history lol".
Indians themselves are confused lol.
Your ancestors history
As the south asia is gradually getting more significant on global level. Its culture, stature, and history will also get prominent and known to all. Thanks for making an informative, unbiased ,and interesting video. Love from Lahore-Punjab, Pakistan.
only India from south asia is becoming significant
Lol pakistan is the cancer of south asia.
Its Indian subcontinent not south asia.
@@riderchallenge4250India is a devolved state with none of the lustre of previous south Asian states you are significant for going backwards💀
@@vishvajitkumar9497 It's South Asia, not Indian subcontinent
The largest settlement is in Rakhigarhi in Haryana, India. It's just that major excavation is still left to do.
Chariots from Sinauli
There is no indus river in Haryana its all flows in Pakistan
@@arandomguy007 "Indus Valley Civilisation" isn't really limited just to Indus river. It's a misnomer based on 1920s discoveries only. This video mentioned Rakhigarhi, but didn't go deeper into it, and just showed the old restricted map.
@@SimhaArya-zu7voThat's not a chariot that a solid wheel War Cart
India has more sites of the IV but 90% of all cultural artefacts and significant pieces of evidence for their culture, arts, and lifestyle have come from sites in Pakistan even tho Pakistan has fewer sites overall. Ancient Pakistan was the centre of the Indus valley.
The most fascinating of the Civilization is the town planning.
Cities of Indus Valley were well planned- Right angled road, well built drainage system, Same residential buildings with Wells and hygiene, use of bricks of same size.
They seemed to have an excellent knowledge of public architecture.
I live in Islamabad Pakistan very close to Taxila. Actually, near the capital city Islamabad in the hills, there are multiple remains of Indus civ and even gandhara civilizarion.
What is taxila
Takshashila is the real name
What indus hindu civilization has to do with truks
@@lordbloodraven9347 Who mentioned anything about the turks. Plus Hinduism is a relegion which was formed much later. Indus Civ did have idol gods. There is some evidence of that. But that doesn't mean it was hindu civilization. Keep your religious Nationalism out of Study of History. Not much is Known about IVC
Takshshila* don't corrupt the name.
Kya baat kar raha hai. Yeh saab Angrezo ne jhoot mooth ka banaya tareekh hai. Pehle yahan bandar kism ki nasl ke log rehte the jinhe kapde banana bhi nahi aata tha. Islam aane se pehle yahan ki tehzeeb African jaisi thi.
Why we need historical and mythological movies when we have a great youtube channel called Kings & Generals ? The animation quality and narration is getting better and better each year. Iam regular viewer of your videos. Thankyou. Gouri Sankar. K
Please do more videos related to Indian subcontinent. I have enjoyed your Indian videos on Indus Valley Civilization, Mauryan Empire Under Emperor Ashoka, Gupta Empire, Indo Greek Kingdom, Indo Roman Trade etc. My suggestions are given below.
1. Pre historic peoples of Indian sub continent: Ancient Ancestral South Indians (AASI)
Basal East Eurasians From East Africa. (Oldest Inhabitants Came Here 45,000 Years Ago.)
2. Mehrgarh Civilization ( Zagrosian Iranian Pastoralists Mixed With AASI)
3. Indus Valley Civilization: ( Zagrosian Iranian Hunters Mixed With AASI) A detailed exploration based on archeaology and genetics.
4. Sintastha Culture (Southern Russia - Kazhaksthan Border. Ancestors Of Indo Aryans, Indo Iranians & Indo Mittanis)
5. Bactria & Margiana Archarological Complex (Mix Of Anatolian Farmers, Iranian Neolithic Farmers & Caucasus Hunters - Gatherers)
6. Rig Vedic Period : A Detailed Study On Early Vedic Society.
7. Later Vedic Period : Decline Of Rig Vedic Society, Composing Of Yajur Veda, Sama Veda & Atharva Veda Along With 13 Upanishads.
8. Rise Of 16 Mahajanapadas: Also Known As Second Urbanisation. (Epics Like Ramayana, Mahabharata & Puranas Were Written In This Period. Rise and Spread Of Jainism & Buddhism. Expansion Of Hinduism In South India, Odissa & Bengal.)
9. Sangam Age Literature & Society In Tamizhakam (Kerala & Tamilnadu)
10. History Of Sri Lanka
11. Kalabra Invasion : Dark Period Of Tamil History Which Led To Fall Of Chola, Chera & Pandya Kingdoms.
12. Rise & Expansion Of Pallavas In Southern India : Split Between Satavahanas & Pallavas, Sanskrit & Maharashtri Prakrit Inscriptions In Palm Leaves & Copper Plates. Defeated Kalabras, Chalukyas & Cholas. Introduction Of Grantha Script For Tamil, Khmer, Thai, Bahasa Indonesian, Malay etc. Large Scale Migration Of Apara Shikha Brahmins To Tamizhakam Encouraged By Pallavas. Construction Of Agamic Temples & Revival Of Hinduism From Jain Kalabra Onslaught.
13. Medieval Cholas : Largest Maritime Naval Empire In India.
14. Kannauj Tripatriate Struggle Between Gurjara Prathiharas, Rashtrakutas & Palas.
15. Malik Kafur's Invasion Of Kanchi, Madurai, Sri Rangam, Trichy, Tanjavur & Chidambaram.
16. Vijayanagara Empire
17. Cochin - Zamorin Wars
18. Travancore Kingdom Under Marthanda Varma & Ramayyan Dalawa.
19. Siege Of Palakkad Fort By British (Carnatic Wars Between Tippu Sultan With French On One Side v/s Zamorin With British On Other Side.)
20. India's Contribution To Two World Wars.
Thankyou 🙏
Amazing video on the IVC, aka the Sapta Sindhu Civilization. I hope to learn more about it in the future and am hopeful that seals, clay tablets, or stelae with longer inscriptions and written material will be uncovered from the sites. These discoveries could help us learn more about this enigmatic civilization.
This channel. Simply. Rocks.
Thanks!
@@KingsandGenerals Bulgarian hobby historians adore K&G
@@KingsandGenerals Plz make a video on Ancient Bengal
Not many historians cover the sublime harappans many will appreciate this video. I hope this incredible video will inspire other content creators in teaching us more about a people lost by the vedic dark ages. One of the greatest sculptures of all time is called the dancing girl. The dancing girl a very prehistoric artifact shows a women who is actually a black women wide nose thick lips bushy hair and especially her tall slim lengthy arms and legs. The priest king and the dancing girl sculptures also have slanted eyes of asians. In earnest don't debauch the ancient harappan heritage by removing the obvious african and asian features in favor of the vedic people. Vedic sanskrit is part of the cluster of european languages english german greek persian etc.
Sick. Didn't realise you do ancient civilisations like IVC!
Absolutely fascinating subject
yep, check the playlist
Most underrated ancient civilization in the world.
सिंधु घाटी सभ्यता 🇮🇳 की जानकारी के लिए धन्यवाद 😊
🇮🇳 ❌
🇵🇰 ✅
@@arandomguy007pakistan has nothing to do with indus valley civilisation
@@arandomguy007 जो भिखारी अपने क्षेत्र की सभ्यता और सांस्कृतिक धरोहरों को नष्ट करने में लगे है , ऐसी संवेदनशील स्थानों पर शादी जैसे आयोजन करते है, उनका सिंधु घाटी सभ्यता पर कोई अधिकार नही । 😁
@@Ankit-d9f4uIndus civilization belongs to Pakistan 🇵🇰
Go home and do your namaz , and see if indus valley is mentioned in Quran or not 😂😂@@aligulzar3450
This actually WELL MADE DOCUMENTARY 😊😊 Watching from India..
Indus Valley civilization is a shared heritage of both India and Pakistan. Instead of fighting people should rather focus on protecting the heritage sites.
Like Pashupati Seal
Exactly. Protect the Pashupati seals, Lingas, Religious statues and people who worship animals and pipal trees. All of which were the religious practices of the Harappan Civilisation.
Problem is Pakistan is a nation formed simply because they are majority muslum, where only their religion has the right to exist, which rejects Indian philosophy and culture and follows a religion founded far away, thousands of years AFTER Indian civilization was founded.
Im sorry i simply cannot accept that. Pakistan was created on the rejection of indian and hindu culture. They cannot now suddenly lay claim to the indus valley civilization. Factually,it makes no sense. Pakistan is a modern creation with a culture borrowed from medieval central asia. They have nothing to do with the indus valley.
I will accept yes,it is more important to preserve the heritage sites than fight over it
@@theyellowflashoftheleaf5896 source: trust my godi media bhakt soruce bro
i love this types of videos
it just shows the perspective of civilizations on grander scale of 1000's of years
Please do more videos on ancient indian history it is an extremely large treasure trove.❤
indus valley belongs to pakistan nothing to do with lundia
Another quality video! Great job K&G.
High quality info. Loads of love from India. 🙂❤🧡
Thanks!
I love India but I don’t know too much about their history.
this is Pakistan history
@@marvelbeauty2023 It's both.
This is Pakistan's history
@@cyberverse9141It's both
Nope it isn't it is ancient India and even after separation India still has most of indus valley sites . So get lost @@marvelbeauty2023
Love from Pakistan 🇵🇰 Thankyou for covering our history. Your channel is so underrated wish you more successs.
It's not" Pakistan's " history 😂😂
Well Indus valley is in Pakistan so it's Pakistani cry hard🍆@@dethfr491
Pakistan has no history Lil bro
how is it your history? This is Indian History; Pakistani history begins in the 1940's. These are Hindus
@@opm3193keep crying frustrated lindu😂
One of the most interesting early civilizations for sure!
The reason why Indus River civillisation is misterios is because it was not a unified kingdom it was like The "Holly" "Roman" "Empire" of the early ancient world.
@@raduraducu2668 yup, no apparent central leader or anything,plus a script that's completely undeciphered.
@@DistantLights ,voten from the princes of these principalities , by other princes just like the Unholy Germ Tribal Confederacy.
Great Pakistan 🇵🇰♥️
@Mmemememehu pakistan rejected thier civilization and hated thier culture and broke most of the artifacts tho. And now adopted a pedo worshipper as thier god.
History of Pakistan is very rich Alhamdulilah ❤🇵🇰
May Allah Pak guide us all to the truth ameen ❤
It was hindu civilization 😂 ... nothing related to ur allah...
@@Why_bharat gangu crying hard for claiming indus region 😂😂indus civilization is history of Pakistan you are gangus and jaamnus 😅
Indian Sindhis are 2.77M in population but own almost 2x the GDP of Bikharistan in wealth.....
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
As a Sindhi, I am very happy you covered the civilization that had existed within our lands, The Indus river is still as important to Pakistan as it was to people living in IVC back then. Various major landmarks of IVC lie in Sindh and many yet remain to be uncovered.
Also from singh. Nothing much happening on IVC on pak side, but indian side doing things.
Mulla ... Indus valley civilization create by dravidan ... and we are not related you current Pakistani ... you guys are Turkish mongol blood
@@vishnuprasad3103 South India doesn’t have a single IVC site lmao. Stop kanging, Patel.
@@BananaConnoisseur Indus valley DNA is the proof you mulla ... don't bark 😂
@@vishnuprasad3103You hole hindu religion come from outside.😂😂😂
And you are talking about other religions 😂😂
More Bronze Age video ideas: the Minoan civilization, the Hyksos, Ugarit, the Shutu, the Olmecs, the Caral-Supe, and the Phoenicians.
I was going to ask about Gilgamesh but that would be for the Wizards and Warriors channel!
Who were the Caral-Supes?
@@Eagler-yc7yx an Andean civilization!
This video feels amazing as I watch it along the banks of the Indus in Pakistan today. Ancestral histories are amazing.
A great video from K&G! This has got to be one of yhe impartial analysis of IVC without the usual biases. Really hope that K&G int he near future makes videos on the Majanpadas and also the elusive proto Dravidian civlisation of southern India.
For the people arguing
If we go just by number of settlements most of them are in India(925 sites in India compared to 475 in pakistan)
Of which the most important are in Pakistan. Sorry
Largest cities and the indus River itself is in pakistan
@@averagenewbie2968 you will upset people with your comment. Some find it hard to digest
@@RoTelnCheese dosent matter most are in India the people of Indus valley were dravidians which are in India the oldest site bhirrana is also in India.
@@averagenewbie2968largest is rakhigarghi which is in india
Great video as ever 😊 I'm a British born Pakistani I'm glad you covered this civilization. Much love from England ♥️
Paki powa
❤🇵🇰🇵🇰
Tere papa hindu the. Arab nahi😂
@@keisuketakahashi3597 tere bab animalistic the. hendu nahi😂
@@keisuketakahashi3597 Race aur religion ka tuje fark ni pata 😂
My city, Udaipur has the Ahar site. It pre-dates the Indus Valley Civilisation, but was also a part of the Indus Valley Civilisation at some point.
Many Pakistanis are claiming indus vally civilisation
But pakistan has nothing to do with the ancient civilization of indus valley
It was a prequel of vedic civilization
Vedic civilization had no connection to indus
@@JakeRed378pashupati seal was found there
@@JakeRed378 it has everything to do with it
@நான்தான்-007 Even in that case, why should pakis larp?
Pak has little connection to IVC either way
If it was dravidian, then India (South) has more claim
If it was proto-vedic, then also dharmic India has way more claim than abrahamic pakistan
Mudu da pandri.. Idhu rendu nadaoda sandai nee edhuku middle la vandhadre.. Summa iru..
Fun facts, out of some of the words rigveda uses for indus people is Mlechha, which comes literally from meluha, a term used in mesoptamian texts for indus people
Some other words rigveda uses for them are
anindra - indra less
Anyavrata - someone with different (anya) vows (customs)
Ayanjya - those who don't yajnya
Shishandeva - those who worship lingam
My favourite of the word rigveda used for indus people is नृषद् meaning someone who sits among humans. Meaning the types of creatures who are not humans but still sit among humans.
Fun facts , highest amount of ivc is found in brahmins like niyogi vadiki iyer iyenger tulu chitpawan.
It's ivc itself who became Aryans by blending with another population
So basically north Indians crying on south Indian upper castes 😂😂
@@understanding.everything
south indian uppercaste aren't native to south too they came from north only, they took part in brahminising the south
North indians are on denial
@@Perseus-x4t No, Highest Amount of IVC is found in Irula tribe in south india, on the other hand Brahmins of UP have highest amount of R1A1 genes (aryan gene), Most Indians today have mixture of both.
@@stalinsampras dude it's the highest AASI found in Irula tribe not IVC know the difference and talk and steppe doesn't mean Aryan
See Yajnadevam’s videos on the recent decryption of the Indus Script, which is now determined to be based on the Sanskrit Language and the Hindu religion. I urge the author of this video to issue an updated video based on the new peer-reviewed information.
Spectacular thing about indus valley civilization is that modern people of indian subcontinent largest genetic component about 70% is from indus valley.
@@Anshulhe what is the source because from what I know The majority of genetic component in south asia is from true indians. The first people who migrated from African to south asia. Then comes indus valley who were Iranian neolithic farmers . Their genetic influence is strongest in Southern India.
Then the indo Aryans who have the most influence in northern India and Pakistan Nepal Bangladesh Sri Lanka.
@@llawliet57807 Wrong, People who first migrated out of Africa 70,000 years back long but changed in fact the oldest remnant of pre harappan ancestry i.e so called indigenous AASI component itself contains 30% Neolithic component.
And it's not Iranian Neolithic farmers but pre farming populations who settled in india from about 12,000 bce as shown by recent genetic analysis. Hence it's now believed that these populations intermixed with indigenous AASI populations about 5000 years before formation of Indus valley
On the basis of which modern studies indicate even farming was independently developed.
Now coming to average IVC person genetics it's about 80% Neolithic and 20% aasi.
Whereas the modern population is about 65% IVC Neolithic, 20% aasi and 15% steppe indo european.
And IVC women skeleton from rakhi garhi from about 4000 years ago, confirms high IVC continuation across indian populations from pakistan to Bangladesh, kashmir to srilanka.
www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=frontline.thehindu.com/arts-and-culture/heritage/harappan-ancestryis-the-single-largest-source-population-for-almost-all-people-in-india-today/article32514104.ece&ved=2ahUKEwjSx7q3zIuJAxV4k68BHW-jPKUQFnoECB8QAQ&usg=AOvVaw1Wy9h6EDWOcatAeq4qAtOb
@llawliet57807 F haplogroup originates in Indian Subcontinent and 90% of all non African males have links to F haplogroup.
R haplogroup originates between Indian Subcontinent & Iranian Plateau.
Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam
@llawliet57807 F haplogroup originates in Indian Subcontinent and 90 % of all non African males have links to F haplogroup.
R haplogroup originates in Indian Subcontinent and Iranian Plateau
Aryan Dravidian concept is fake and rooted in racism. It was proposed by Max Muller who was a racist and an evangelist.
Thankyou for covering the history of Pakistan. ❤🇵🇰
Incoming people from Ganga 🇮🇳 to claim the history of Pakistan.
I first learned about this civilization taking a course with Professor CC Lamberg-Karlovsky at Harvard (he at one point had been Benazir Bhutto's professor). Even though I mainly focused in Roman civilization in my degree, that was perhaps the best course I ever took in college.
You're just going to casually drop Iron Maiden lyrics at 11:18 and hope no one notices? lol
Alexander the great 🤘
@@AbrarTheQureshi Ghost of the Navigator actually but at least you got the spirit
@@vaderthegreater haha, that's my favourite album.
Also Sindhu Saraswati civilization. Our books talk about the river saraswati. The archeological remains at Rakhigarhi and Kalibanga were along the course of river that disappeared. Update your knowledge.
Rigvedic and later Vedic texts are used to suggest identification of present-day rivers or ancient riverbeds. The River Sarasvati is said to lie between the Yamuna on the east and the Shatdru on the west in the Rigveda's Nadistuti Sukta (10.75); the river Sarasvati was a tributary of the Bhagirathi River, which was active until the 16th century, but is almost non-existent today.Majumdar, Dr. R.C., History of Ancient Bengal, First published 1971, Reprint 2005, pp. 2-3, Tulshi Prakashani, Kolkata
@@rajasphadke3995 yes! Scientifically proven. That's why it's called sapt sindhu, seven rivers, of which saraswati was also one
@@kanika0846 Please IVC has nothing to with Aryans Civilization, In Vedic age aryans were nomadic people they never build cities but they were rather destroying cities they came across. Indra is famous for conquering and destroying ports so Indra was given the epithet “Purandara”, which literally means “destroyer of forts” or "breaker of cities"
@@stalinsampras my friend 😂😂 Aryan invasion theory is debunked already. There were no Aryans. Secondly, you're talking about godly figures to prove your point? 😂 Isn't it ironic? Using "Aryans" to disconnect the "Aryans" from IVC? Books my friend books, read them
@@kanika0846 You are definitely in a bubble if you think Aryan Migration Theory is debunked 😂🤣, I only hear that from Hindu Nationalist who claim what you said. But Aryan Migration Theory is the Current Scientific Consensus taught all around the world in Various Departments from History, Archaeology to linguistics. Heck they are even taught in Indian Universities.
How is it ironic again? In Rig Veda Aryans were nomadic and pastoral people, they literally did not build cities and there are literally no cities in Vedas, Vedas describe no such cities and fortifications but whereas ivc is literally filled with cities and towns there are 1500+ such places.
If IVC was vedic why do we see no cities in vedas they do not talk about cities or towns and no talks on town planning. If IVC is vedic why do we find no horses in IVC, Where as horses were the most important animal in Vedas and Vedic age
How Ironic that you are asking me to Read Books when you are literally parroting Fringe Hindu Nationalist Narrative that is Out of India Theory.
Excellent explanation of Indus valley civilization.❤
"Shared History of India and Pakistan" is not an accurate description . History of India (or Bharat) is more than 5,000 years old starting from Early Indus Valley Civilization and at its peak under Emperor Ashok Maurya (3rd Century BC aroundish) , the Mauryan Empire (Hindu[Chandragupta Maurya] to Buddhist [Ashoka Maurya]) spanned over modern day Afghanistan , Pakistan & India.
This was all before Islam even existed. History of Pakistan starts from only 1947 because Pakistan is primarily just people of Indian religions who were forcefully (or not) converted into Islam & their descendants later demanding a nation of their own where Islam would be the main & (these days) only religion.
Please do not claim Sindhi history. Just because we are muslim does not mean our blood changed
These people who were insulting Pashupati Seal until 2017 are now claiming it as their heritage 😂
Yes, which means exactly what you attempt denying here - they are the same people as you and are simply of another religion. Still means you share origins and history.
@@عظيمشاھعبداللطيفڀٽائيthe people of ivc are not the same as modern day sindhis. Infact ivc gene composition is most similar with south indians rather than Pakistanis or north indians.
That Means Civilizations are actually based on religions,😂
That means if you change your religion so your father and mother will be changed also,
You are truly a genius,.👏👏👏
My grandfather worked in India between 1961 and 1992. In the early sixties, he, my grandma and my father and brothers and sisters went to Lothal. I don't know exactly where that is. Anyway, they were playing by the banks of a creek and found lots and lots of little statues. My Grandpa took one of them to the city hall, not really knowing what to do, and told the staff there that they had found these small statues (terracotta) by the creek. They they didn't seem very interested and apparently nothing happened. My grandpa first kept that one statue, it was really tiny, and later felt bad and donated it to a museum in Paris. Probably not the ideal situation. But it's kind of weird also that the local government in Lothal didn't seem to care. To be honest, my grandpa thought they probably sent someone down to the creek and had the statues sold on the black market. It sad how archaeological things get dispersed.
I would suggest people watching this video to take it with pinch of salt. A Good number of inaccuracies are there about the History of IVC. Though it's a well done video.
🤔 .. for example ? ..
No one takes everything on the internet in face value but saying this can make the hard work of the creator go to waste. Unless you are a professor or expert in the field, saying it has inaccuracies doesn’t sit well. If you provide examples, then it can be discussed
Can you also make a video on the Gandhara civilisation?
The confidence with which amateur conjectures are dished out as historical facts is mind blowing.
Quite possibly this civilization was either the first or one of the first to have flush toilets.
Yup
Yeah sadly the Northern Aryans destroyed everything and didn't even inherited the system which today now they be 💩 in the streets of Delhi
@deandeathstrike9398 Paki😂 pretending to be from south.
@deandeathstrike9398 Pucki pretending to be from south😂
@@akhripasta2670😂😂
Please do a video 1500 bce aryan invasion from cental asia
@@joebidet2050 Aryan invasion theory is debunked now. It's not real
its fake
That's quite racist as well as challenging for India's unity
So skip that topic
You guys have been killing it and asserting/ elaborating upon questions I have always wanted answered in fascinating and engaging manners.
Am sure the comments would be very respectful and there would be no arguments between 2 specific nations regarding claim of Indus valley civilisation
geographically its only in one state
@@BarlasofIndus There are more IVC sites in India(925) than Pakistan(475)
@@MarshaloftheEmpire So far, you seem to forget there still can be many uncovered sites in Pakistan... besides the majority of Indus river still runs in Pakistan.
@@عظيمشاھعبداللطيفڀٽائي
Well you see India has more potential for bigger and more sites as per recent data.
At the time of independence India had no sites while pakistan had all major and minor sites.
Fast forward today india has around 1000 of total ivc sites out of 1400 also has the oldest and biggest.
Also recently discoveries in india has led archaeologist to beleive that indus valley has no epicentre. It was multiple centre civilization. Indus river being only one of them others are in Indian state of Haryana Rajasthan and Gujarat. There are also more sites undergoing Survey in Indian state of Haryana than whole pakistan lol
@@عظيمشاھعبداللطيفڀٽائي You do realise that the existence of the Pakistani state in the region of the Indus valley is merely an outcome of religious demography which favoured the Muslim league right? If Muslims had been the majority in Maharashtra then Pakistan would be formed there, would that make them Marathas now? Lol
my parents' hometown is 30 mins from harappa, it's weird to think that we're from one of the first centres of civilisation. I've been to see the ruins and it's fairly humbling to see how little remains of once was a great civilisation however also fascinating that anything still exists from such an ancient place. You can see lots of pottery found from the area too which are in good condition and there's a creepy skeleton on display
Indo Aryans came from Southern Russia
Yajurveda 13/37,
"O wise men, learn from the sages of old, who are hospitable, like charioteers who harness their horses, who are well controlled by the skilled, and who have seated themselves on the seat of justice."
Here the Vedas ask to learn from the ancient sages, that is, there were ancient human civilizations when the Vedas were written. Then I saw who were charioteers, horsemen. As we know, Ratharohana, i.e. the chariots was invented long after human civilization
The oldest known chariots have been found in burials of the Sintashta culture in modern-day Chelyabinsk Oblast, Russia, dated to c. 1950-1880 BCE
Sinauli, India had chariots at the same time as Sintashta.
Sinauli is one of the earliest archaeological sites in the Indian subcontinent that provides evidence of chariots and royal burials with warfare elements during the Ochre Coloured Pottery (OCP) and Copper Hoard culture in the Ganga-Yamuna doab, more than 4,000 years ago.
The material culture recovered at Sinauli indicates that the Sinaulians were involved in warfare activities. The antiquities recovered show a high degree of sophistication in wood and copper craftsmanship.
Eight burials have been excavated so far. Among them was a unique royal burial with a copper-decorated coffin with legs, and a lid that featured high-relief carvings of anthropomorphic figures. These figures wore headgear with two horns and a Ficus religiosa (sacred fig tree) at the center. The figures, besides having detailed faces, were depicted with broad shoulders and torsos.
This burial also contained two chariots, a copper pot, a helmet, two stick tops, a copper channel, a copper-decorated whip, gold-steatite beads, and pottery, suggesting the individual was of royal status, possibly a chief or clan leader. The discovery of three full-sized chariots in these royal burials suggests warfare took place in the region.
The chariot wheels were decorated with three rows of copper triangles radiating from the center. This discovery indicates that Indians were using chariots, helmets, and swords in warfare more than 4,000 years ago.
Additionally, the recovered items include antenna swords with wooden hilts and copper spiral wiring
Aryan invasion theory has already been proven wrong .
@@Kalki0025 The distance between these two place (Chelyabinsk and Sinauli) is over 4400-5600 km even on todays roads, which is huge. and takes 40+ days of walking time without stopping, to make it, so with 8 hour walk per day it takes 122 days or longer. Chariotry could have developed simultanously as well... Or there could have been a civilization that domesticated horses, and spread fast with this military advantage. But even then 100-200 years feels really fast to get this distance in actual ways of domestication, so i feel simultanous discovery is more reasonable...
@@Kalki0025 indian ones are not spiked charriots .and early ivc people did not know any creature called horse
@@Kalki0025Slav Russians doesn't have South Asian hunter gatherers DNA admixture while North Indians have European hunter gatherers DNA admixture
The Indus Valley Civilization was originally started by the native Dravidians (Ancestors of the Tamils, Telegus, and Kannigas) and flourished until the invasion of the Aryans.
What is sources of your claim. DMK.
@@cbadaik9498 Not just DMK say that, plenty of credible research organizations say so like Usborne, BBC, and Oxford.
The original dravidians speakers were light skinned. The Darkies in south india have very little dravidian blood despite speaking dravidian languages. It is like African Americans speaking the english language It was not their native language in the first place. In short, South Indians have only a little Dravidian blood.
@@theawesomeman9821 my friend Aryan invasion theory is just fake , indus valley civilization wasn't destroyed by Aryan attack , most of historian believe it was natural cause of its end
Dravidian people migrated from ancient Iran. These proto-Iranian farmers Dravidianized ancient India and also influenced Hinduism or animistic religions that existed alongside the hunter-gatherer populations there
The impact of Dravidian migration on the region was possibly more significant than later Aryan migration to southern India. Dravidians may have displaced the Andamanese tribes. Old Tamil shows similarities with the Elamite language.
Thank you @kingsandGenerals for sharing our remarkable civilization ❤
The maps need a lot of corrections. Rakhigarhi is part of the IVC. The Indus Delta used to be further East into the Rann of Kutch (it used to until 1890s) and Bay of Cambay. Present day Gujrat used to be an island and Swamp land (like Florida). Ghagra used to flow parallel to the Indus along the channel of present day Luni. The region was greener.
@libshastra exactly!! finally I found a comment on this
Too many Indians in the comments are like "saar wow thanks for vid" Instead of criticizing and fact checking the video for deleted a huge chunk of the IVC area.
I would bet that someone in the research or editing team is an inbred-paki
As a Pakistani I would like to thank you for making video on the IVC. Bothe the cities are truly fascinating and historical treasures.
But muslims are destroying the artifacts in pakistan and afghanisthan .
This is not your history this is Indian civilization
@@Coolguy-or8ex shutup stupid!
@@Coolguy-or8exIt is his history mr lindu living 1500 km away from the actual place and have no DNA of that😂😂😂
@@abuzaformohammedaman9205it is unfortunate to have that in pakistan
and that explains all of you are converted 😂
Oh hell yes. I've been interested in learning more about this civilization/culture.
Thanks for you efforts ♡
The History of Bharat( non Islamic) is very rich in culture and beyond imagination.
Bro doesn't know difference between religion and ethnicity/Culture. Indus Valley Civilization is Pakistan became it was in modern day Pakistan 🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰
@@cyberverse9141 Your History starts from a mere 70+ years but this dates more than 5k.
Plus more of bharat history before indus valley, inscribed in Vedas.
Our Indian history is divided into eras
One unfortunately after muslim inavsions.
And others before that.
And yes modern day Pakistan is doing utmost to save the culture of Bharat👍
@@ridingwithsoumo2710 based on what? 🤣 did Punjab, Sindh, Balochistan, Kashmir, Kpk fell from the sky in 1947 😂 These Pakistani provinces have history older than all provinces of India 🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰
Pakistanis like Palestinians changed their identity. But genetically the Pakistanis are the natives and descendants of the Indus valley civilization. @@ridingwithsoumo2710
lmao bharat was in ganges then
if kings and generals ever goes down the path of the history channel, i'm gonna lose it
Why would we
Incredible insights! Your approach really makes complex ideas feel accessible
0:28 Pakistan was created in 1947. It has nothing to do with anything pre-1947 history.
Land of Punjab, Sindh, KPK, Balochistan is now called Pakistan. The history on that land belongs to Pakistanis. It is not bihari or UP walas history. Be proud of your bihari or UP heritage.
@@stangerdanger7252 Surely you haven't understood what i wrote in my initial statement. Anything pre-1947 has nothing to with PK, you may claim post-1947 history. Btw, just as PK was created from thin air in 1947, so eventually it will vanish in thin air in future. Even PK name was first coined in 1930s, which is not even a blip in the long Indian history.
India was also created in 1947.
Indus Valley is near-entirely in Pakistan. Keep complaining.
@@hamzakhattak8309 Just a small example for delusional or less-read Pakistanis, your loving political party which created PK, it's full name was 'All India Muslim league' established 1906. So, you you see India existed before 1947.
And i agree you 'converted arab slaves' are occupying 90% of Indus since 1947.
@@rupendra79 So Bangladesh which formed on 1971 has no relation to its land before 1971? These Bangladeshi came out of on 1971 ? Modern day benglis have 100% right on their land and history of 1000s of years. Stop stealing history of other people, your history is confined to bihar and UP.
Next Video Do Andronovo Culture
NO
@@anshumansarkar3206
تو چی میگی
Great suggestion 💯
@@anshumansarkar3206 What No?
1. 15:40 - Really curious to know which year this map is from when India and Burma are part of British empire but Pakistan is a separate entity...
2. Overall a good video but you need to update theory of decline about IVC. New research and findings suggest that the IVC was actually more concentrated towards the Ghagra Hakkar river system (aka Saraswati) which eventually dried up and therefore made the people migrate towards Gangetic planes. This is based on the finding that majority of IVC sites are based around Ghagra Hakkar not Indus river i.e. around 2/3 of the total sites found so far. This also goes along with the mention of the river Saraswati in Rig Veda in its prime, thereby, indicating that the IVC itself was the Vedic civilization and it has existed much before the proposed 3500 BC since the river that vedas talks about supposedly started drying up around after 4000 BC.
Modern historians are changing the way they look at the history of South Asia wherein ancient Pakistani history (which evolved distinct to the Indian lands history) is being given its own credit and context. Over the next decade you can expect to see this approach become more commonplace as Pakistanis have started to value their own history.
And secondly, even tho India has more IV sites than Pakistan, 90% of all cultural artefacts and evidence of IV culture comes from the sites in Pakistan. This is evidence enough for historians to suggest that Pakistan was the cultural and historical centre of the Indus Valley, and the sites in India were merely extensions to the actual important sites that are in Pakistan. This is why many historians believe either Harrapa or Mohenjo Daro to be the capitals of the civilisation and not any Indian site. The IV also extended into Afghanistan and Iran. Pakistan is the IV centre. The culture and civilisation centred around here. Plus over the past decade or so Pakistan has made no progress in excavating new sites - and I’m sure if Pakistan poured resources into this it would easily have more sites or larger quantity and quality.
All in all it’s irrefutable that the IVC is mainly ancient Pakistani history, and as time goes on and more and more historians start accrediting ancient Pakistani history as ancient Pakistani history, we’ll see this perspective become more commonplace.
Answer this. If IVC is a Vedic civilization then why can’t the IVC script be deciphered? What mental gymnastics are you gonna pull off lmao
@@BananaConnoisseur my dear bheemte, to decipher a script, you need some text, long texts to match the context. But in case of IVC there is only 1 slab of 1 line. You can never decipher it! Got it mr gyaanchand?
@@Zecos 😂😂 you exposed yourself. "Now Pakistanis have started to accept their history" well, I'm so glad they now know that they're not sheikhs 😂😂 not Arabs, not turks, but INDIAN!
@@kanika0846 Puhhjeet my son, if you believe the IVC to be Vedic then its script should match to an Indo-Aryan script like Sanskrit, right? But it doesn’t, therefore it’s not Vedic! This is purely from a linguistic standpoint, we’re not even touching genetic data or archaeology. I’ll award you a bronze medal since you tried really hard🥉
Thank you for covering our ancient history. 🇵🇰❤️
Bhikaristan 😂
Its Indian, not pakistan. Indians share more dna from indus valley civililization than pakistanis according to recent studies.
How can you claim this if you don't share any culture with us?
@@AyushDew7 with you? Who tf are you to claim Indus Civilization? You belong to Ganga, we are the sons of the indus valley. It's civilization and history belongs to us.
Just look at the region of indus, not even 10% of your country comprise of Indus. Only north western part of your country relates with us. Otherwise your nation is totally different from us. You belong to ganga, we belong to indus.
@@hariskiani9601 kid genetically & culturally you have no connections with Indus valley civilization they didn't have any Aryan dna in them but Pakistanis have almost 30% Aryan genes. Genetically people of south india, gujrat, and Middle caste people of central India are closest to IVC because later after flood they migrated to coastal parts of India. You guys are living there doesn't mean your ancestors are from ivc
been waiting for this for so long
We, Indians, are the living continuation of the Indus Valley civilisation. We are the Indus Valley people. Don't bring in Pakistan into this matter, as it is only 75 yrs old, simply because Mohenjo daro and Harappa happens to be in modern day Pakistan. The Pakistani people are mixed central Asian, persian and Turkic islamic descent ( except may be the people of Punjab, and Sind), and have nothing to do with Indus Valley Civilisation. They are relatively recent muslim immigrants, who have displaced the Hindu population of the place eastwards, in the last 800 years of Islamic rule of India. We, Hindus, living in India, are the original Indus Valley people.
Lol
You are trying to say that majority punjabis and sindhi who make 70 percent of Pakistan's population are not decedent of the this land and came from somewhere else and a hindu living in bagal and asam or kerla or Goa or somewhere else in india thousans of miles away is actual person of this land just because he is hindu??
@Farooq_Tv exactly. That is what population displacement is. It happened to the Indus valley people when so called Aryans came from Northwest. It happened again with the arrival of muslim Turks and Aghans after Mamud of Ghazni's conquest of Multan, Punjab and Sind reinforced further after annexation by Mohd of Ghor ( in fact, colonisation started from the time of Bin Qasim in the 8th century). Resident hindu population was exterminated just as it is being done today in Pakistan and Bangladesh. Those who survived, fled eastward or southwards.
@@arijitmukherjee1719 Genetically, there are more Bengali and Punjabi Muslims than Hindus or others. Every tribe that exists in Hinduism also exists among Muslims, sharing the same DNA, complexion, and origins-only the religions differ. This has been proven multiple times. The only distinct group in Pakistan may be the Pashtuns.
If we combine India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and the surrounding region, there would be more Muslims than Hindus. So, who truly owns this land? We belong here, and no attempts by governments to kill or displace us will succeed.
@@Foshoo1nah
It hasn't even been an hour and the comment section is getting filled with Nationalist bots and bots that have some "interesting" profiles.
You kidding? The Pakistan-India rivalry surpasses the Balkans. What’s worse is that they’re both nuclear powers.
@@CliffCardi No one cares about Balkans outside of europe.
Honestly it's depressing. I utterly despise ultra-nationalist historical revisionism.
@@CliffCardirelax. The only country to use nukes offensively is the US. Pakistanis and Indians have great restraint considering how much hate there is.
Pakjeets don't have any history 😆
Love this channel so much. Free history and anthropology on the daily.
Thanks!
Genetically Dravidian language speaking South Indian agricultural groups such as Velamas,, Reddys, Thiyyas, Vellalars show the most proximity to ancient Indus Valley DNA. However there is a concerted effort to appropriate this history by Pakistani and even North Indian nationalists. Truth cannot be hidden.
NO, these Stupid theories don't even have anthropological evidence. First of all, learn that Dravidian itself is an Hypothetical reconstructed Language family. Meaning There is NO Definitive evidence for it. Nobody is trying dissort History
Disappointed that there is no mention of the Dravidian people and their connection to this
Finally IVC video from K&G
Thanks for the video it was good
Genetically South Indian agricultural groups such as Reddys and Velamas show the most proximity to ancient IVC DNA. There are IVC DNA samples which are nearly identical to Reddys. Chief ministers Revanth Reddy and Jagan Reddy of Telangana and Andhra respectively are two of the most famous from this group.
This is by far the best video that I have ever seen on the Indus Valley Civilization.👍
Comment section has become a battleground
I'm actually tired of these indian national wars. They're all the same people i'll be real.
@@thewarlock539 I second that
@@thewarlock539 generically,not really. India itself is made up of three races(Aryan mixed north, Dravidian Tamils south, and north east)
@@thewarlock539 The whole war exists because some of the Indians refuse to believe that they are Indians.
@@BarlasofIndusThere are sino-tibetans like in Northeast India
Cause India is a artificial project made by British and all thanks to British
The more you realize the more partition such as Bangladesh makes sanse
Thank you for covering ancient history of my country Pakistan. People say our history is only 70 years long. When our civilization has been the most ancient one
Indus valley is a part of India. Pakistan's history is 70 years only. The only reason why pakistan was created was primarily because of Muslim league.
Country of 3rd generation convert who hate their history
@@AdityaKumar-eg5tnlol India was only made in 1947 by that same logic
@@mlgdigimonstart worshipping shiva then
Indus people worshipped shiva
@@Vlad---what Beharis /Tamils use to worship before Vedic time ?
We(Pakistani) worship Allah or shiva still it will not make Pakistanis Beharis/Tamils
I reccomend you to read "The chalice and the blade" by Riane Eisler. Even if some of what it is said in the book is nowadays outdated, due to the fact it was written 40 years ago, I think it brings some really interesting points of reflexion on this ancien civ.
Keep up the good work.
Genetically South Indian farmers such as Telugu Reddys and Velamas are the real descendants of Indus Valley. There are IVC periphery DNA samples which are nearly identical to Reddys. Chief ministers Revanth Reddy and Jagan Reddy of Telangana and Andhra respectively are two of the most famous from this group.
How can we check or learn about DNA ancestry to ancient groups? I mean where is the source
The DNA of a Male skeleton founded in Indus valley site of Rakhigarhi . Which was ( Classified as '" I4411'' ) shows affinity with present-day South Indian tribal populations , most notably the " Irula Tribal group " population in the Nilgiri Mountains of kerala and Tamil Nadu . A total of 61 skeletons were found till 2016
@@mscreationworks5787It collapsed when the Indo Europeans or rather the Indo Iranians arrived
@ulrichkristensen4087 Bro , First understand that Ancient Iranians and Indo European language Steppe pastoralists were different group . But before entering Indian Subcontinent Steppe pastoralists stayed at Iranian lands and started to adopt their names like " Arya " even Religious & cultural heritage
That's , why Anicent Iranian Religious book called " Avesta " has close similarities with Rigveda
@mscreationworks5787 Indo Iranians, came from the same source as the Indoe Europeans, same language group and DNA
Thank you kings
Best video on this topic in RUclips.
This comment section reaks with whatsapp uni graduates and the amount of kanging by pajeets is insane😭😭
Saraswati river and other made up sites, this whole we waz indus saar propaganda is getting bigger in india and the amount of these nallay that believe in it is even crazier