I find it incredibly tedious; and I'm really very appreciative that Paul takes the time not only to film it, but to narrate and edit it as well. As tedious as it is, it's a wonderful encyclopedia of testing that I find myself referring to again and again.
I appreciate the chronograph information. Always good to see how close or not the velocity is from what is printed on the box from the different brands of ammo.
Remember folks, ammunition is often tested in barrel lengths you may not be using the ammo in, especially 22 LR ammunition (often tested in rifles), and longer-barrelled handguns (not your ultra-sub-compact-mini-9mm or snubbie revolver with a 1 inch barrel). You'll see significant pressure differences caused by short barrels, not bad ammo.
@Mark H, I agree with what you are saying. I was just trying to express my appreciation for Mr Harrell’s approach and assessment of the data. Especially the variation in velocity he gets from the same ammo. He seems to give a fair assessment.
Paul Harrell once again showing us he's deadly at long range; most might scoff at the "20 yard pistol shooting WTH" but look at the size of these groups, 3, 4, 5"
@@mattberry4457 Paul had to send a drunken man to the sweet by and by because he endangered his(Paul's) wife on a camping trip. It was dark and the man was driving his truck at the time. It's not always about the size of the groups, but if you can perform under intense pressure.
@@mattberry4457 Hmm, guessing his groups were approximately 4". At 20 yards, standing in the cold. I'd say pretty darn good. Duplicate the conditions, record yours and post up, whilst standing, free hand, no bench rest.
Over the years I have widdled down the number of firearms related channels I watch. Paul your's has been ny favorite since the day I stumbled in here. Outstanding content delivered by a true professional.
The only reason I really like to see the chronometer tests is to see the variability. For sure 20fps is like 2% and won’t do much outside of high level competition, but higher variability shows lower QC.
I shamefully admit to drifting a little during the chronograph segments, but only because the background scenery is so often gloriously, well, scenic. Very glad he keeps them in regardless.
Good information, well presented. I know know more about a couple ammunition manufacturers that I did not know before; very helpful. As for Mr. Harrell wearing his LBV in the field, I assume it is because in Mr. Harrell's well reasoned thinking he considers it necessary to wear it in the field. He's out there alone, with his expensive guns and expensive camera equipment and is responsible for his own safety. I think that is very logical.
Wow, two Paul Harrell videos in a single day! Actually gives me a reason to celebrate this holiday weekend. Also, that ammo test was so tedious...loved it! Thanks for keeping it detailed.
I'm glad you're still out here presenting data in this way. I may not need to know about that ammunition right now, but I might in the future, and it will be nice to have an honest and trustworthy comparison if that day comes.
Sorry if there are active concerns that your having to be alert for Paul. Goes without saying, love all of your content and I have learned so much for you. Thank you Paul !
I won't re-quote anything from Paul's other videos, but there's enough bits and pieces of info in them that it's logical and fairly easy to understand why he carries his LBV loadout the way he does. Another great vid Paul, thank you for the information as always!
I always figured the reason you wear that kit in every video is because of your military experience; it's what you've trained with. You know it, are comfortable with it and it works for your needs just fine, so why change it? And as always, fantastic video!
I live in Central Arizona and have not seen any of the Patriot Sports in local stores yet. Have noticed more Magtech and .25 caliber lately. Been wearing surplus LBE and WW II web gear for many years.
My BP9 likes 124 grain stuff, and luckily, so does my wife's BP9. So we both carry the same weapon everyday, along witht the same ammo. 125 grain Sig V-crown.
Great comparison review! Thanks for doing the dirty work for a fair test, and seeing how it performs, in case as you said it becomes available and reasonable. Love your work and dry humor!
Another masterpiece 👍😎👍 . Please continue to put the chronograph footage as a part of the presentation. Thanks for all the great content and entertainment.
I've been to the Patriot store front/warehouse and they're nice folks with big plans. I found the ammo a bit more accurate than the Winchester and Remington I normally shoot. They have big plans for the future
Thanks for the video! That all of the ammunition except the MagTech seemed to go left a little bit was interesting. I hadn't thought about the angle of the sun causing that, but I can see where that would be an issue.
Curious what defensive ammo you use and does the Magtec pattern similarly to it? I reload 9mm, 124 grain round nose for training ammo. It patterns very close to my Speer Gold Dot, 124 grain defensive ammo. But when I was running low on my reloads, I wanted to buy some commercial ammo. I'll give the Magtec a shot and see how it does. Thanks for any reply. Cheers
As always, great video. The 'not theatrical' comment at the beginning was a shock. Perhaps Paul will fill us in at some point soon. Needless to say, if he feels the need to be permanently prepared and armed .... theres a good reason. Stay safe.
Paul: I watch these videos intently (have not seen everything you've done though) and I appreciate you calling out your fliers, but can you go into why they happen and ways to eliminate them? Seems to be a very interesting phenomenon and many amateurs seem to blame the gun first off and/or the ammo but never themselves.
Very rare occurrence indeed, since that instance requires the refresh rate of the camera align perfectly with the particular position of the projectile Higher rate cameras increase that probability, of course super slow mo cameras built to catch it everytime
Paul, love your vids and you advertised that you will have to sprinkle in some of those sponsored videos. But in short succession they are a getting a bit bland. Just a suggestion - maybe you could spice them up a bit with showing what self defense load they would be a good training match for looking at recoil and point of impact
That one was very obvious; the sun was gleaming on it making it a copper blur and I'd wager it was either an artifact of the camera's frame rate or even a slightly underloaded round, or both!
@@Hjerte_Verke Given typical shutter speeds for outdoor lighting, there was an extremely narrow time window for the camera to capture that moment. I wonder if the diagonal lines are due to the bullet rotating. I'm guessing the rifling of the gun barrel is designed to induce 1 full rotation per N inches of travel, and perhaps the diagonal lines in the frame would line up with that. Rolling shutter could be a contribution, though it is hard to tell how much.
It is interesting that your first two choices had far less vertical stringing, which is generally a sign of velocity changes….at least with rifles at longer distances anyway.
New to the channel. Here to see how Patriot Sports LLC ammo performs since it’s what’s available at my gun store. Love all the info and different comparisons. I’m going to pull the trigger and purchase Patriot Sports 223 55 grain for my AR and see how it goes.
7:26 Not sure if it was a trick of the light but I usually don't see the projectile headed for the target so clearly. Especially with 9mm. I always think it's cool to see.
Paul is a great shot with a pistol!! I am 80 and my hands shake a good bit, so my pistol groups at 20 yards are far and wide. I think it may be the ammo that I shoot??
Except for two rounds, the Patriot struck me as being tightly clustered around 1050. I computed the standard deviations, and Patriot wins in that measurement. Standard deviations are: 13.56 (MagTech), 10.67 (Winchester), 9.93 (Remington), and 8.56 (Patriot)
Looks like pretty good ammo that I'd have no problems shooting, but after pricing it on their website, it looks pretty expensive and not too widely available. For my purposes, I can, and have, bought other 9mm training ammo for considerably less and gotten pretty decent results.
Love that 92FS platform. Dumbest trade I ever made was giving up my Taurus PT100 (.40 cal clone to that pistol you were shooting. Actually location safety was much better). Anyway at 15 yds on a sand bag that old pistol (circa 1985) would keyhole a mag if the shooter did his job...at least with my 180 gr reloads.
I wouldn't mind seeing the same test with Igman 124g 9mm. I've been finding it online for a very competitive price with others like CCI Blazer Brass, Sellier & Bellot, and PMC. I've been using it and have been happy with it.
I know I'm going to try it. Now that I know my local gun shop offers it. Especially for the price. If I pick it up at the gun shop. I don't have to pay shipping costs. That, saves in some cases. BIG MONEY! Since most ammo suppliers charge by weight. Since this gun shop is only 4 miles from my house. No brainer
Do you think you'll do a comparison between the standard run of the mill hunting rifle rounds like 30-06 and 308 and so on compared to the magnum rifle rounds like 300 winmag and 6.5 creedmore and so on? How much flatter shooting the latter are, how much more energy they have and damage they can do, and is the difference significant enough to justify the added costs for the purposes of hunting?
Always wondered if standard deviation was an important stat. It's supposed to be a measure of consistency... and when it comes to ammo I think consistency would be one of the most important factors (after velocity and bullet type for the same caliber... and reliability of course).
@@Jonathan906 Yeah, thanks. I saw that. Was wondering if it's important. Like, would you choose a round with a greater standard deviation if the other stats were better? (like greater velocity). Have read before though that sometimes greater velocity equals less penetration, because it causes greater expansion. Like HP 22lr, it's more deadly from a handgun, because it penetrates deeper (without any expansion)... but when fired from a rifle it penetrates far less, because it expands.
@@deucedeuce1572 It might depend on how much greater that standard deviation was. Generally speaking, I like consistency, but there are other factors to consider. I don't own a chronograph myself, so I can't measure the ammo I use like Paul does.
For target ammunition, I think standard deviation, which a chronograph can measure, would be one of the two major concerns, the other being bullet shape. If a bullet is the same weight as others, but is asymmetrical forward of the portion that bears on the rifling, or the base is not perfectly flat, it might chronograph consistently, but not hit the target with the accuracy of correctly shaped bullets. It would be interesting to see a test with hand-loaded deliberately misshapen bullets to see how much effect that might have. I don't know the shape effect could easily be measured with production ammunition, but I think it would require thorough examination of each bullet, and test barrels securely mounted on a bench. Of course, with self-defense or hunting ammunition, reliability, bullet design and power become important factors as well.
Interesting that the chronograph said all the rounds were below the speed of sound or "subsonic" yet I could hear the sonic boom from each of them when fired... interesting
Paul Harrell, the self-described “Average Shooter”. LOL. Your humility is amazing. Love your videos. And yes, even the tedious chronograph footage.
Paul: I’m an average shooter… look a butterfly 80 yards away, I’ll hit it in the left wing…. Got it!!!!
If he’s the average shooter I need to go back to water guns…
"We've substituted Paul Harrell for the average shooter; let's see what happens..."
Being an _Average Person_ myself, I have to agree, because I shoot as _Average_ as he does. ⭐👍👍🤠🐎🐎🐎
I find it incredibly tedious; and I'm really very appreciative that Paul takes the time not only to film it, but to narrate and edit it as well. As tedious as it is, it's a wonderful encyclopedia of testing that I find myself referring to again and again.
The man who always gets to the point.
I appreciate the chronograph information. Always good to see how close or not the velocity is from what is printed on the box from the different brands of ammo.
Remember folks, ammunition is often tested in barrel lengths you may not be using the ammo in, especially 22 LR ammunition (often tested in rifles), and longer-barrelled handguns (not your ultra-sub-compact-mini-9mm or snubbie revolver with a 1 inch barrel). You'll see significant pressure differences caused by short barrels, not bad ammo.
@Mark H, I agree with what you are saying. I was just trying to express my appreciation for Mr Harrell’s approach and assessment of the data. Especially the variation in velocity he gets from the same ammo. He seems to give a fair assessment.
I think seeing the consistency or otherwise is more valuable.
The people at patriot sports are doing a happy dance right now.
Paul Harrell once again showing us he's deadly at long range; most might scoff at the "20 yard pistol shooting WTH" but look at the size of these groups, 3, 4, 5"
those groups are not very good at all.
@@mattberry4457 Paul had to send a drunken man to the sweet by and by because he endangered his(Paul's) wife on a camping trip.
It was dark and the man was driving his truck at the time.
It's not always about the size of the groups, but if you can perform under intense pressure.
@@mattberry4457 Hmm, guessing his groups were approximately 4". At 20 yards, standing in the cold. I'd say pretty darn good. Duplicate the conditions, record yours and post up, whilst standing, free hand, no bench rest.
So I didn't really win a lifetime supply of Pop Tarts?
Thats fkd up sounds like you won the lottery and they just took it all away
😥 sorry to hear that.
No, you win second prize, a used meat target. Contact me on wat z app to collect!
I feel lied to...
Woulda been gold if a scam bot replied to your comment lol
Over the years I have widdled down the number of firearms related channels I watch. Paul your's has been ny favorite since the day I stumbled in here. Outstanding content delivered by a true professional.
With the rare exception, he's the only one I watch.
The only reason I really like to see the chronometer tests is to see the variability. For sure 20fps is like 2% and won’t do much outside of high level competition, but higher variability shows lower QC.
I shamefully admit to drifting a little during the chronograph segments, but only because the background scenery is so often gloriously, well, scenic. Very glad he keeps them in regardless.
@@richhardie6897 Lol, yeah it’s hard sometimes, but you gotta stay awake and watch for stray deer in the background. 😀
@@richhardie6897 If I do drift, I find myself looking for deer or Bigfoot in the background.... and I'm often rewarded with a sighting
Good information, well presented. I know know more about a couple ammunition manufacturers that I did not know before; very helpful.
As for Mr. Harrell wearing his LBV in the field, I assume it is because in Mr. Harrell's well reasoned thinking he considers it necessary to wear it in the field. He's out there alone, with his expensive guns and expensive camera equipment and is responsible for his own safety. I think that is very logical.
Thanks Paul, I always appreciate your reviews!
This review comes at a good time, I'm seeing a lot more 9mm available out there. This helps make some decisions. Thanks for sharing.........
Wow, two Paul Harrell videos in a single day! Actually gives me a reason to celebrate this holiday weekend. Also, that ammo test was so tedious...loved it! Thanks for keeping it detailed.
Paul always throwing out those caveats. Lol. God bless you, Paul.
Thank you Paul for being consistent and professional while having realistic understanding to your topics and explanations. Appreciate you. 👍🏻
Pretty cool, camera catching the flight of some of the rounds.
I'm happy someone else saw that. I thought I was hallucinating.
I had to go back and watch it at 0.25x speed to be sure. I didn't know cameras could even do that.
Thanks for making the Patriot Sports LLC video
I was actually impressed by the Magtech. When available it’s the most affordable I can find.
I like the content Paul you're very informative and objective with all of your ballistic matchups
NEVER TEDIOUS-- always entertaining & informative-- carry on !
I'm glad you're still out here presenting data in this way. I may not need to know about that ammunition right now, but I might in the future, and it will be nice to have an honest and trustworthy comparison if that day comes.
Watching a Paul Harrel video and skipping the chronograph section is like going to eat at a burger place and leaving out the patty.
No
Sorry if there are active concerns that your having to be alert for Paul. Goes without saying, love all of your content and I have learned so much for you. Thank you Paul !
Loved the video Paul, thank you, looking forward to hearing why you are outfitted as you are, hope it’s not down to any injury….
I won't re-quote anything from Paul's other videos, but there's enough bits and pieces of info in them that it's logical and fairly easy to understand why he carries his LBV loadout the way he does.
Another great vid Paul, thank you for the information as always!
Summary for us stupid people?
I always just assumed it was what he was comfortable with and what worked for him. Never really put much thought into it.
@@whoshotashleybabbitt4924 Capitol police Lt. Michael Byrd
I always figured the reason you wear that kit in every video is because of your military experience; it's what you've trained with. You know it, are comfortable with it and it works for your needs just fine, so why change it?
And as always, fantastic video!
I'm thinking more of the possibility of a Big cat, a bear, or a rabid coyote. Wolves are also making a comeback.
He didn't used to, so something has changed. I'm a long time follower.
It's just a sign of the times that Paul has to open carry on the range. Pop-tart banditry is not a joke.
Right on
Paul Harrell, the man the myth the legend
Indeed he is
How is he a " Myth " ?
@@IrnMaiden304 that no man can eat a poptart and shoot accurately at the same time
Consistent, fair and informative. Hallmarks of a Paul Harrell review.
JMHO- I like the ALICE LBE gear.
It's good serviceable kit.
Thanks for the video
Well that was the fastest recap of a previous episode I have ever seen.
Thanks Paul for another smooth video.
I love the Chrono scenes. 10⭐&👍👍🤠
I live in Central Arizona and have not seen any of the Patriot Sports in local stores yet. Have noticed more Magtech and .25 caliber lately. Been wearing surplus LBE and WW II web gear for many years.
Lovely quality and production. Paul Harrell and Co. thank you.
As always, very informative!
Thank you.
My BP9 likes 124 grain stuff, and luckily, so does my wife's BP9. So we both carry the same weapon everyday, along witht the same ammo. 125 grain Sig V-crown.
Great presentation, Paul.
Noticed this is a cinematic video: 24fps movie look. Like the professional production style 👍
We have a double feature this week!
Great comparison review! Thanks for doing the dirty work for a fair test, and seeing how it performs, in case as you said it becomes available and reasonable. Love your work and dry humor!
Another masterpiece 👍😎👍 .
Please continue to put the chronograph footage as a part of the presentation. Thanks for all the great content and entertainment.
Another great video. Thanks Paul.👍
I've been to the Patriot store front/warehouse and they're nice folks with big plans. I found the ammo a bit more accurate than the Winchester and Remington I normally shoot. They have big plans for the future
Great video! Thanks Paul 😊!!
Went and looked up the company. Distributes product out of Topeka Kansas, ammo made in Czech Republic. Only has 124gr 9x19 and 55gr 223/5.56.
I've actually been there and met them. Super nice folks with plans to expand selection
I looked up the word "tedium"... according to Merriam Webster... its "the time spent twiddling thumbs between Paul Harrell videos"...
Thanks Paul! Very enjoyable!
Thanks for the video!
That all of the ammunition except the MagTech seemed to go left a little bit was interesting. I hadn't thought about the angle of the sun causing that, but I can see where that would be an issue.
A two-fer. Christmas came early. Thanks Paul, Semper Fi.
Great
7:28 The camera caught the bullet mid-flight! .25X speed helps.
Interesting review as always.
There is nothing like waking up and hearing the echo of Paul's ammo testing ringing throughout the hills.
I've been happy with Magtec 124gr FMJ for practice. I like that it is loaded a little hotter than the others.
Curious what defensive ammo you use and does the Magtec pattern similarly to it? I reload 9mm, 124 grain round nose for training ammo. It patterns very close to my Speer Gold Dot, 124 grain defensive ammo. But when I was running low on my reloads, I wanted to buy some commercial ammo. I'll give the Magtec a shot and see how it does. Thanks for any reply. Cheers
@@greg9076 It seems to work fine for defensive practice
As always, great video. The 'not theatrical' comment at the beginning was a shock. Perhaps Paul will fill us in at some point soon. Needless to say, if he feels the need to be permanently prepared and armed .... theres a good reason. Stay safe.
2! Count them, 2! Paul Harrell videos!
Thanks Spongebob
Your brother sent a man to hell in minneapolis.
Thanks Paul!
Whoo-hoo! Bonus round! Two PH vids back to back! And some nice, tedious chronograph analysis besides!
Yeah ! Always down to watch that !
Thanks Paul
Every time you upload, we all win a prize
Just wondering about this ammo. Great timing.
Nice video. Thank you.
Great stuff, as always.
Interesting. One of the frames right around 7:28/7:29 caught the bullet just before it hit the target.
Patriot is imported Scorpio from Czech Republic but in a different box, sold direct from their website, and at a higher price than Scorpio? Cool.
Hope your back feels better.
Paul: I watch these videos intently (have not seen everything you've done though) and I appreciate you calling out your fliers, but can you go into why they happen and ways to eliminate them?
Seems to be a very interesting phenomenon and many amateurs seem to blame the gun first off and/or the ammo but never themselves.
Double tap of PH Videos 👍👍
At 7:27 you can virtually SEE that bullet entering the target! Sweet.
Very rare occurrence indeed, since that instance requires the refresh rate of the camera align perfectly with the particular position of the projectile
Higher rate cameras increase that probability, of course super slow mo cameras built to catch it everytime
Is that a new jacket?
thanks
Paul, love your vids and you advertised that you will have to sprinkle in some of those sponsored videos.
But in short succession they are a getting a bit bland.
Just a suggestion - maybe you could spice them up a bit with showing what self defense load they would be a good training match for looking at recoil and point of impact
14:00 WOW the camera happened to capture a frame at just the right time to see the bullet mid-flight!
Same thing happens at about 7:27 too!
Cool! I totally had missed seeing that. Thanks for the heads up.
That one was very obvious; the sun was gleaming on it making it a copper blur and I'd wager it was either an artifact
of the camera's frame rate or even a slightly underloaded round, or both!
I thought I caught that too, so I replayed it back at 25% speed and sure enough that was indeed a bullet in flight.
@@Hjerte_Verke Given typical shutter speeds for outdoor lighting, there was an extremely narrow time window for the camera to capture that moment.
I wonder if the diagonal lines are due to the bullet rotating. I'm guessing the rifling of the gun barrel is designed to induce 1 full rotation per N inches of travel, and perhaps the diagonal lines in the frame would line up with that.
Rolling shutter could be a contribution, though it is hard to tell how much.
Thanks.
Outstanding review.
It is interesting that your first two choices had far less vertical stringing, which is generally a sign of velocity changes….at least with rifles at longer distances anyway.
New to the channel. Here to see how Patriot Sports LLC ammo performs since it’s what’s available at my gun store. Love all the info and different comparisons. I’m going to pull the trigger and purchase Patriot Sports 223 55 grain for my AR and see how it goes.
In my subdued sarcasm Paul, anytime I watch your videos, I win a prize. A day on the range is better than no day.
Is Paul Harrell "the average shooter"? You be the judge.
7:26 Not sure if it was a trick of the light but I usually don't see the projectile headed for the target so clearly. Especially with 9mm. I always think it's cool to see.
You shoot a lot more than I get to. Your groups always make me feel better about my groups. No shade on you. Just you show realistic groupings.
Paul is a great shot with a pistol!! I am 80 and my hands shake a good bit, so my pistol groups at 20 yards are far and wide. I think it may be the ammo that I shoot??
Except for two rounds, the Patriot struck me as being tightly clustered around 1050. I computed the standard deviations, and Patriot wins in that measurement. Standard deviations are: 13.56 (MagTech), 10.67 (Winchester), 9.93 (Remington), and 8.56 (Patriot)
Looks like pretty good ammo that I'd have no problems shooting, but after pricing it on their website, it looks pretty expensive and not too widely available. For my purposes, I can, and have, bought other 9mm training ammo for considerably less and gotten pretty decent results.
Love that 92FS platform. Dumbest trade I ever made was giving up my Taurus PT100 (.40 cal clone to that pistol you were shooting. Actually location safety was much better). Anyway at 15 yds on a sand bag that old pistol (circa 1985) would keyhole a mag if the shooter did his job...at least with my 180 gr reloads.
Paul referring to himself as “the average shooter”. Stop! My sides! 😂
Keep the ammo reviews coming paul 👍👍
I use Magtech 45 ACP, and it certainly has more recoil than other brands, so it must be a hotter load than average.
The only guy on RUclips that I automatically click like before I hit play
Thanks!
I wouldn't mind seeing the same test with Igman 124g 9mm. I've been finding it online for a very competitive price with others like CCI Blazer Brass, Sellier & Bellot, and PMC. I've been using it and have been happy with it.
I know I'm going to try it. Now that I know my local gun shop offers it. Especially for the price. If I pick it up at the gun shop. I don't have to pay shipping costs. That, saves in some cases. BIG MONEY! Since most ammo suppliers charge by weight. Since this gun shop is only 4 miles from my house. No brainer
Do you think you'll do a comparison between the standard run of the mill hunting rifle rounds like 30-06 and 308 and so on compared to the magnum rifle rounds like 300 winmag and 6.5 creedmore and so on? How much flatter shooting the latter are, how much more energy they have and damage they can do, and is the difference significant enough to justify the added costs for the purposes of hunting?
Always wondered if standard deviation was an important stat. It's supposed to be a measure of consistency... and when it comes to ammo I think consistency would be one of the most important factors (after velocity and bullet type for the same caliber... and reliability of course).
Standard deviations are: 13.56 (MagTech), 10.67 (Winchester), 9.93 (Remington), and 8.56 (Patriot)
@@Jonathan906 Yeah, thanks. I saw that. Was wondering if it's important. Like, would you choose a round with a greater standard deviation if the other stats were better? (like greater velocity). Have read before though that sometimes greater velocity equals less penetration, because it causes greater expansion.
Like HP 22lr, it's more deadly from a handgun, because it penetrates deeper (without any expansion)... but when fired from a rifle it penetrates far less, because it expands.
@@deucedeuce1572 It might depend on how much greater that standard deviation was. Generally speaking, I like consistency, but there are other factors to consider. I don't own a chronograph myself, so I can't measure the ammo I use like Paul does.
For target ammunition, I think standard deviation, which a chronograph can measure, would be one of the two major concerns, the other being bullet shape. If a bullet is the same weight as others, but is asymmetrical forward of the portion that bears on the rifling, or the base is not perfectly flat, it might chronograph consistently, but not hit the target with the accuracy of correctly shaped bullets.
It would be interesting to see a test with hand-loaded deliberately misshapen bullets to see how much effect that might have. I don't know the shape effect could easily be measured with production ammunition, but I think it would require thorough examination of each bullet, and test barrels securely mounted on a bench.
Of course, with self-defense or hunting ammunition, reliability, bullet design and power become important factors as well.
I like the magtech because where I live it’s as cheap as anything else yet it isn’t underpowered like most others
Hey Paul, I got your message in the chat. I sent you the $100 processing fee. How long does it usually take to get the prize? Thanks.
Wait, I paid $250 processing fee! 😆
Hmmmmmm
My prize was supposed to be
shipped freight paid
Excellent review, as always Paul. Could you tell me what chrono you are using? Thanks
Caldwell ballistic precision.
Interesting that the chronograph said all the rounds were below the speed of sound or "subsonic" yet I could hear the sonic boom from each of them when fired... interesting
Paul, you are not the adverage shooter. My groups would be much much more spread out. ;)