What is Cronbach's Alpha? - Explained Simply (Part 3)

[@hanslofgren8199]

Thanks man, you are skilled, pedagogic, interesting and easy to listen to.

[@edmundbuzon3392]

Hans Löfgren Agree. The only problem is that he is kind of a d*ck for cutting the videos. (quoting this from one of the comments) But yeah, he can improve by not cutting them. Currently, he is too worried about getting more view counts which is kinda funny. xD

[@JohnJoseph26]

By far the most helpful explanation of Cronbach's Alpha! Well Done how2stats!

[@tenochtitilian]

Does a great presentation on Cronbach's alpha. Concludes by telling you it's superseded by Omega.

[@vikramgarcha9031]

Dear sir,
Your videos are simply the best. Very clear , to the point self explanatory and easy to understand and comprehend..

[@TheKaradashian]

Thank you! This is awesome.
If I watch this another 1000 times I'll understand! These things take me so long to learn but this video was so much more helpful than my stupid textbook!

[@LorCorVin]

Awesome explaination, you helped not only to understand it in a glimpse but even provided the awesome not on the meaning of the cut off criterium acording to Nunnally which helped me a lot :)

[@thelateknights]

This was fantastic. Thanks so much! This is hands down the best video on Cronbach's Alpha.

[@paulkerruems]

Thank you - I thought you explained this beautifully for me, a non-statistician, but involved in psychometric assessments; thanks again.

[@dr.anubhutinigam5467]

Thank you. This was the best video I have come across so far.

[@Isuppose12]

Love all your stat videos💝 Thanks!

[@TheBizz1913]

Thank you so much. I really needed this in my life. I can not believe I understood everything you actually said.

[@ScotchTapeification]

Best explanation I have gotten on the topic

[@CheeseColeslaw]

Excellent video. Very clearly and concisely explained.

[@zuzana2703]

This is really great ! Thank you - you have a very good explanation and presentation skills ! Looking forward for more of your videos :)

[@FaisalKhan-jg6kg]

thanks for the series. clear and simple.

[@fabiomoreira8923]

Thank you so much! Very helpful!

[@zihanjj]

Thank ... one of the best explanations I have seen...

[@how2stats]

Thanks!

[@adriftinsleepwakefulness7039]

But what is internal consistency in the first place? Why do we need it? And how Cronbach solve it? What is the difference with others? Could you please get more into where it came from rather than how to use it?

[@eguirald]

Thank you for your highly instructive videos! I have enjoyed them greatly.
I reckon that a very high alpha coefficient may not actually be an auspicious thing since it may stem from a redundancy in the items, in the sense that some of them are assessing the same question.

[@subasanakashyap7007]

Thanks for the informative video. Respect.

[@kingmramra]

Thank you very much Sir. I have learned a lot from you.

[@kaylawilson805]

This was great! Saved me so much time

[@CEDESSMX]

very helpful! thank you

[@mericguzelant]

Thanks mate, you've been very helpful!

[@couragee1]

thank you!

[@corepune]

Thanks so much! It has been helpful.

[@syedatabassumfareed5499]

Thank you so much, it was a great help!! Once again thank you for sharing...
Can you please tell me how to write the interpretation and thesis?

[@1standlasttogo]

thanks a ton. from Egypt

[@dr.anasababneh284]

very useful, Thank you

[@Leon-zx2cc]

Streiner pointed out that a value of alpha above. 90 may be too high and indicate redundancy in the items. Im confused.

[@how2stats]

That would be a possibility, if you had only a small number of items (say, 8 or less). However, I've seen scales with 30 or more items with reliability of .90 and the items are definitely not redundant.

[@Maldmorfs04]

thanks. Im still confused but now at elast I know what is it about.

[@zhehabeshascience3066]

good

[@haisni]

Thank you so so much!!! :) :)

[@zulffiquer732]

Thanks

[@teabsamrith5351]

Hi, i would like to ask you some question. What is we found in cronbach's alpha if items deleted is N/A. What should we do and is it right to have this thing appear.Thanks a lots

[@zulffiquer732]

Thanks