Types of Validity

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 июл 2024
  • This podcast covers validity of studies (internal, external, conclusion) and validity of measures/construct validity (face, content, concurrent, predictive, convergent, discriminant).

Комментарии • 75

  • @mikesliter7601
    @mikesliter7601  9 лет назад +104

    I'm happy that people have found this video helpful!

    • @Imponderabilia995
      @Imponderabilia995 5 лет назад

      seriously. I love You right now.

    • @guilhermeadan2329
      @guilhermeadan2329 4 года назад

      still very helpful 4 years later!

    • @academiaofconfinglish387
      @academiaofconfinglish387 2 года назад

      How do u make the video... Will u share plz

    • @lee198877
      @lee198877 2 года назад +1

      7:00 Face validity
      9:28 Content validity
      11:59 Convergent validity
      12:43 Discriminant validity
      14:11 Predictive validity

    • @samaralfageih7739
      @samaralfageih7739 Год назад

      Excuse me . How the test can be valid and reliable and how reliable can not be valid?

  • @lydiaornot
    @lydiaornot 2 года назад +4

    This is so helpful, thank you, Mike. You are REALLY good at explaining concepts and find relevant, easy to understand examples. You are def. doing a better job than my psych research lecturer haha

  • @RaisedByArmadillos
    @RaisedByArmadillos 8 лет назад +2

    This video might have got me past a severe bump in my studies. Big thanks!

  • @IbrahimJatau
    @IbrahimJatau 6 лет назад +7

    This video is helpful! The concepts were explained for easy understanding to non-statisticians

  • @nataliajaramillo6545
    @nataliajaramillo6545 5 лет назад +1

    This was so helpful!!!! It's the clearest explanation that I have seen covering this material.

  • @TheKaradashian
    @TheKaradashian 8 лет назад +10

    I've been struggling trying to make sense out of these concepts and this video has helped so much. Thank you!

  • @brenhancock7219
    @brenhancock7219 4 года назад +1

    Just what I needed - Wicked Mike!

  • @giannavervaet41
    @giannavervaet41 5 лет назад +5

    Thanks for explaining ! It was really helpful!

  • @connie4551
    @connie4551 4 года назад

    Thank you so much! You've explained them really well! So helpful!

  • @WlLL96
    @WlLL96 5 лет назад +1

    Great vid, my man! Many thanks.

  • @oriannatorres1765
    @oriannatorres1765 5 лет назад +1

    THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THIS VIDEO!

  • @KathySolita
    @KathySolita 8 лет назад +1

    Great job, thank you for the explanation

  • @evanovianti1593
    @evanovianti1593 9 лет назад +2

    yes, this video is really helpful

  • @kangma4462
    @kangma4462 6 лет назад

    clear to understand and it covers core ideas of validity. thanks

  • @alfredmathias3961
    @alfredmathias3961 4 года назад +1

    Thanks a lot for good explanation and clearly.

  • @heatherbingaman5693
    @heatherbingaman5693 Год назад

    WOW! Really excellently clearly done!! TY!!

  • @brandonriggs3844
    @brandonriggs3844 9 лет назад +3

    Mike Sliter. Your video helped me finish my Organizational Psychology test. Thank you.

    • @cakansha1
      @cakansha1 5 лет назад

      You look cute asf. Are you single? 😂

  • @annalisaslifestyle4267
    @annalisaslifestyle4267 5 лет назад +1

    Very helpful, I am currently studying and recognize my knowledge on this topic were not as in depth as i would like

  • @Freemyworld1
    @Freemyworld1 9 лет назад +3

    Thank you so very much...

  • @laurenwilliams5204
    @laurenwilliams5204 9 лет назад +3

    thank you, very helpful!

  • @jamesp8095
    @jamesp8095 5 лет назад +1

    Thank you for the video.

  • @christineguirguis5521
    @christineguirguis5521 5 лет назад +1

    Thank you! So helpful!

  • @Victoria-vm1be
    @Victoria-vm1be 5 лет назад +1

    Thank you so much!! 🤗🤗

  • @mbadiou
    @mbadiou 6 лет назад

    Brilliant video, thank you

  • @maram5102
    @maram5102 3 года назад

    Thank you so so much , well explained !

  • @sof2955
    @sof2955 6 лет назад +2

    thank you, this was very helpful

  • @sweetsmall14
    @sweetsmall14 4 года назад

    This video helped put the terms in a normal way where everyone can understand this! When I read the book it looks like mumbo jumbo!!

  • @nauduliuke
    @nauduliuke 2 года назад

    thank you so much, this has been very useful studying for my exam

  • @vivianesalibadagher2135
    @vivianesalibadagher2135 9 лет назад +2

    thank you this was really helpful !

  • @robsvideos1140
    @robsvideos1140 3 года назад

    Thanks for the video. Im studying this stuff in college now.

  • @awwadelmahadi5883
    @awwadelmahadi5883 8 лет назад +1

    Awesome! Thanks man.

  • @ruthtappinph.d.5003
    @ruthtappinph.d.5003 8 лет назад +1

    excellent teaching video!

  • @saniamoursik
    @saniamoursik 6 лет назад

    Thanks! Very clear.

  • @user-fm8ns3cc3t
    @user-fm8ns3cc3t 10 месяцев назад

    This is very helpful! I had to do an assignment for my Psychology of Personality class and no matter what content I read, I just couldn't get a grasp of face validity to save my own life; it all just sounded like gibberish to me

  • @youneverknew_me
    @youneverknew_me 7 лет назад +5

    Thank you, Mike! This is so eye-opening, I got really confused with those unorganized validities yet you organized them in clarity. And I have a question for you, hope you answer it soon: Is it valid if I measured the test of "Predictive TOEFL" used in my local university with a score related to the TOEFL components?
    And one more, do I need to compare both English major in my university (English Education and English Literature) score courses related to TOEFL components? Or it is enough to test just one of them?

  • @gloriaantonios8072
    @gloriaantonios8072 9 лет назад +4

    thank you!

  • @gabiUFC
    @gabiUFC 8 лет назад +1

    thank you for the video. it was very useful thanks ;-)

  • @shonpe2392
    @shonpe2392 7 лет назад +1

    Great video. Very in depth. Do you have anymore? I need help with a research design class for I/O Psych

  • @mariannemichael2612
    @mariannemichael2612 7 лет назад

    Thanks a lot. It was really useful

  • @catherined8936
    @catherined8936 6 лет назад +1

    THANK YOU!

  • @mikkoaaltonen4198
    @mikkoaaltonen4198 9 лет назад +2

    Thanks!

  • @viannapillai6995
    @viannapillai6995 2 года назад

    Thank you!

  • @mohammadhesamrabiei3968
    @mohammadhesamrabiei3968 Год назад

    Awesome explanation

  • @letswonder6612
    @letswonder6612 2 года назад

    Big help Thank you

  • @maevequinn4127
    @maevequinn4127 6 лет назад

    Thank you

  • @tanveenkalra5057
    @tanveenkalra5057 4 года назад +2

    I owe you some really good marks .. :)

  • @meg86
    @meg86 2 месяца назад

    thanks mikee :)

  • @smichael0712
    @smichael0712 4 года назад

    Thank you for this video. Can you do a video on trinitarian and unitary?

  • @easyphysics2846
    @easyphysics2846 5 лет назад

    Thanks...

  • @mandirasworld1591
    @mandirasworld1591 5 лет назад +2

    I need the explanation of validity

  • @johnwoodruff8298
    @johnwoodruff8298 5 лет назад +1

    Very helpful, I missed my lecture over these concepts, and I was having trouble understanding these with only definitions. Only thing I did not get from this was incremental validity.

  • @aaronkoh4567
    @aaronkoh4567 Год назад

    Hi, could I ask, if I have an experiment that seeks to measure which burger is more popular, through a forced choice survey that only allows a selection of one burger,
    Would that affect construct validity, considering that I have failed to account that someone may like both burgers equally much, or may dislike both burgers?
    Would this pertain to construct validity? Or internal validity?

  • @kathywyman9460
    @kathywyman9460 8 лет назад +3

    Is the slide that comes up around 10:56 mark (and the accompanying narration) supposed to say "Content" where it says "construct" in first bullet point (Face+ construct)?

    • @kathywyman9460
      @kathywyman9460 8 лет назад +1

      (Not meant as a random criticism....a well-done and very helpful video overall. Just trying to make sure I'm understanding this concept correctly.)

    • @mikesliter7601
      @mikesliter7601  8 лет назад +3

      +Kathy Wyman Yeah, you are correct. Sorry about that; had the typo in the slide and compounded the typo by saying it incorrectly aloud!

  • @couragee1
    @couragee1 Год назад

    thanks

  • @mandasari1143
    @mandasari1143 6 лет назад

    How make the table concept validity ?.

  • @riada4959
    @riada4959 7 лет назад

    THANK YOU SO FUCKING MUCH!!!

  • @itswhateverbro13
    @itswhateverbro13 2 года назад

    Hey why did you stop making videos

    • @mahmd87.
      @mahmd87. Месяц назад

      H😊😮😮9iiiiiiiiiuuhggggggggggggggfffffffffffffhı😢

  • @joshc6569
    @joshc6569 6 лет назад +1

    Convergent is otherwise known as construct??

    • @joshc6569
      @joshc6569 6 лет назад

      Never mind. Covered construct in the end

  • @mttbear
    @mttbear 7 лет назад

    In the question, "to what extent does this department have waste and inefficiency in its operation?" I am to evaluate validity and reliability.... What are your thoughts?

  • @asmaaali1391
    @asmaaali1391 Год назад

    thanks
    i wish if you muslim

  • @andyd6462
    @andyd6462 5 лет назад

    am sorry to day bt instead of simplifying things u have complicated it.

  • @matthe3234
    @matthe3234 3 года назад

    Thanks, very helpful!

  • @rmercadejas1951
    @rmercadejas1951 2 года назад

    Thank you

  • @aaronkoh4567
    @aaronkoh4567 Год назад

    Hi, could I ask, if I have an experiment that seeks to measure which burger is more popular, through a forced choice survey that only allows a selection of one burger,
    Would that affect construct validity, considering that I have failed to account that someone may like both burgers equally much, or may dislike both burgers?
    Would this pertain to construct validity? Or internal validity?