There are thousands and thousands of Psych students entering undergrad and graduate programs every year. How is it that you don't have hundreds of thousands of views?! Your explanations are clear, they are relatable, and your examples compliment the content so well. Your whole channel should be added to students outlines as a resource. Love your content!
I loved this video. I'm taking my child psychiatry boards in 6 weeks and this was the first time I truly captured these concepts. Thank you very much for those examples, they were super helpful!
wow, I have already commended you elsewhere, but this is seriously THE best explanation I have ever come across, including during bachelor studies in psychology...thanks!
Great videos! everything was making sense for me until we got to criterion validity - I can't seem to make it make sense! Any other examples or ways of trying to understand it? Thanks so much!
Sure, another example to demonstrate the two kinds of criterion-related validity could be for an assessment designed to measure levels of aggression for a child. Concurrent validity for this assessment might see if there's a relationship between the child's aggression score on the assessment now and current behavior problems or fights at school. For predictive validity, I might see if this assessment is able to predict aggressive behavior later, such as arrests for aggressive crimes in adulthood. Hope this helps!
This video covers a section of the introductory psychology guidebook I wrote, which summarizes key concepts found across a range of introductory psychology books and courses. So not all intro texts or courses would cover all of these and may choose to just focus on a few types.
Hi, could I ask, if I have an experiment that seeks to measure which burger is more popular, through a forced choice survey that only allows a selection of one burger, Would that affect construct validity, considering that I have failed to account that someone may like both burgers equally much, or may dislike both burgers? Would this pertain to construct validity? Or internal validity?
I think this would be considered an issue related to content validity in that your measure doesn't include all relevant aspects (other burger options, etc).
The idea is that if you aren't measuring what you intend to measure (low construct validity) then the data isn't useful for drawing conclusions about the properties you claim to be investigating, even if the assessment seems to be valid in other ways (it's comprehensive or it allows predictions about other variables, etc.)
![[#2024MAMA] G-DRAGON - 무제(Untitled, 2014)+POWER+HOME SWEET HOME+뱅뱅뱅+FANTASTIC BABY | Mnet 241123 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ox29z5Nf1Uk/mqdefault.jpg)
There are thousands and thousands of Psych students entering undergrad and graduate programs every year. How is it that you don't have hundreds of thousands of views?! Your explanations are clear, they are relatable, and your examples compliment the content so well. Your whole channel should be added to students outlines as a resource. Love your content!
Thanks so much for the compliments, I'm glad to hear that the videos are helpful for you. I hope my videos can reach and help even more students too!
I've never had anyone explain these to me the way you do. Commendable! Really thankful for your insights and teaching. ♡
Thanks, I'm glad I can help!
Best explanation I've seen so far on youtube
I loved this video. I'm taking my child psychiatry boards in 6 weeks and this was the first time I truly captured these concepts. Thank you very much for those examples, they were super helpful!
Glad this could help, best of luck in your studies!
@@PsychExamReview thank you for saying that!!
This is included in my report on my master's degree. Thank you for the comprehensive explanation!
I am level 1 and I am very confused 😔
So so helpful! 😊 Thank you for taking the type to help us pass because you explain a theoretic concept in simple terms!
Glad I can help!
wow, I have already commended you elsewhere, but this is seriously THE best explanation I have ever come across, including during bachelor studies in psychology...thanks!
You're welcome, glad to hear these explanations help, thanks for the compliment!
very helpful & easy to understand! the examples really helped. thank you for making this!
You're welcome, glad it was helpful!
God bless you sir, I was just laughing through out at the simplifications used 😅.....you good man
Very clear and easy to understand. Thanks!
You're welcome!
didn't know validity types could be this easy peasy lemon squeazy lol make more videos thenks bruv
Haha, you're welcome!
Great videos! everything was making sense for me until we got to criterion validity - I can't seem to make it make sense! Any other examples or ways of trying to understand it? Thanks so much!
Sure, another example to demonstrate the two kinds of criterion-related validity could be for an assessment designed to measure levels of aggression for a child. Concurrent validity for this assessment might see if there's a relationship between the child's aggression score on the assessment now and current behavior problems or fights at school. For predictive validity, I might see if this assessment is able to predict aggressive behavior later, such as arrests for aggressive crimes in adulthood. Hope this helps!
Thanks very much!
You're welcome!
Great. This was useful.
Glad to hear that!
Wow thank you so much! Could you pls share the source of the sorts of validity in assessment??? 😊
This video covers a section of the introductory psychology guidebook I wrote, which summarizes key concepts found across a range of introductory psychology books and courses. So not all intro texts or courses would cover all of these and may choose to just focus on a few types.
Great summary!
Thanks!
very helpful. Thank you
You're welcome!
Hi, could I ask, if I have an experiment that seeks to measure which burger is more popular, through a forced choice survey that only allows a selection of one burger,
Would that affect construct validity, considering that I have failed to account that someone may like both burgers equally much, or may dislike both burgers?
Would this pertain to construct validity? Or internal validity?
I think this would be considered an issue related to content validity in that your measure doesn't include all relevant aspects (other burger options, etc).
Is this Bill Hader's better-looking brother?
Why does construct validity subsumes all types of validity?
The idea is that if you aren't measuring what you intend to measure (low construct validity) then the data isn't useful for drawing conclusions about the properties you claim to be investigating, even if the assessment seems to be valid in other ways (it's comprehensive or it allows predictions about other variables, etc.)