How Good Was Michael Chang Actually?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 сен 2022
- How Good Was Michael Chang Actually?
Michael Chang was a great fascinating player of the modern era. One of the most remarkable achievements in tennis history was his victory at the French Open as a seventeen-year-old.
At times, he went toe-to-toe with one of the world's best. Let's see how good Michael Chang truly was.
Channel inspired by Channel inspired by TennisTV, TENNIS TALK with Cam Williams, WTA, Tennistic Productions, CULT TENNIS
Inspired by How Good Was Andre Agassi Actually?
Inspired by How Good Was Pete Sampras Actually?
Inspired by How Good Was Boris Becker Actually?
SUBSCRIBE: bit.ly/tennisplusyt
SUBSCRIBE: bit.ly/tennisplusyt
For copyright matters relating to our channel please contact us directly at : luxurypluschannel@gmail.com
In this video we go over tennis,tennis plus,roland garros,wimbledon,us open,australian open,chang,michael chang,michael chang tennis classic,michael chang tennis,how good was michael chang actually,michael chang us open,michael chang highlights,pete sampras michael chang,michael chang best moments,michael chang life after tennis,michael chang vs pete sampras,united states tennis association,atp tour,michael chang early life,michael chang career,michael chang winner
#michaelchang #chang #tennis 
Спорт
Chang was one of the reasons I got into tennis. My parents saw a young Chinese/Taiwanese player win the French Open and decided to see if I could do the same. Sadly for them, I'm nowhere near as skilled as Chang. But I still love tennis and will continue to play until I'm old and confined to a wheelchair.
Albert Yu / me too, inspired by Micheal , I was 30 years old in 1989 French open the year Micheal Chang won his grand slam championship, I picked up tennis game, still playing tennis since then.
Taiwanese American, he isn’t Chinese
Why can’t people just get inspired by a great player and not make up some racial reason to like something. The whole concept it so exhausting.
@@socalstr your name sounds white so you wouldn't know.
@@harrison3910 which is just Chinese-American at the end of the day
It's incredible how much Chang got given his lack of a big weapon - but his speed was breathtaking. I watched him live a few times and often his opponent dropshots or killer shots that looks impossible to retrieve, but then he retrieved it and counterpunched to a winner. When I met him in person, I saw his thighs were otherworldly huge and muscular, that gave him that speed.
Michael Chang was an inspiration for generations of Asian Americans and continues to be even today! I never really enjoyed his grind it out style when compared to beautiful strikers like Pistol Pete or Andre, but his grit, determination, and chess skills on the court always garnered a ton of respect. An absolute legend and unique players to come out of the greatest era of American tennis players in the sport's history.
God loves you, seek him and if you want forgiven of your sins and want to be certain that your sins are forgiven believe in the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved
There were two phases to Chang's career, first was the 17 year old who won the French Open by running everything down, surprising his opponents with his incredible acceleration and change of direction. In the second phase of Chang's career, he was no longer a baseline grinder, but an attacking all court player. Chang was a fixture in the top-10 in an extremely tough era of tennis, and made it to 3 other Grand Slam finals, against Sampras, Becker, and Muster, who are also all-time greats.
God loves you, seek him and if you want forgiven of your sins and want to be certain that your sins are forgiven believe in the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved
To me, Chang's 1989 French Open run and Ivanisevic's 2001 Wimbledon run are the two best runs to a grand slam title in the modern history of men's tennis.
Chang absolutely maximize his talent and imo was an overachiever. There were so many great players in his era he had to do battle with. Unfortunately, he was just an undersized player going against all the heavyweights. He had that mentality of never giving up on a ball similar to that of Nadal and Joker.
Chang was basically the first significant Asian athlete I remember seeing in any sport, not just tennis. He led the way for a lot of people outside of tennis too
God loves you, seek him and if you want forgiven of your sins and want to be certain that your sins are forgiven believe in the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved
Chang was the first one to break through in winning a major title during the early Sampras, Agassi, Courier, Chang generation of tennis. I think his early achievement was a major push for the other Americans to believe they could do the same or better.
Sampras credits Chang for giving him confidence to win the 91 US Open
Pound for pound the best tennis player ever :) Gilbert said there will never be another champion under 6ft tall again. If you grew up playing tennis, you know it's difficult being short in this game. He was able to compete at a huge disadvantage of being only 5'8. Thanks for all the memories Chang.
he is 5'8" on a good day. he's more 5'7" to be honest. he and Diego Schwartzman are about the same height.
I understand Gilbert's comment, back in the 70's when i was growing up there was an interesting dynamic there: big games versus grinders, the Cliff Richeys, Harold Soloman etc. Going for it shots/mistakes versus getting the ball back/not making mistakes. Now, not so much technology has eliminated that sort of specialization. There does seem to be a sweet spot though if Federer and Djokovic and Nadal are examples right around 6' 1".
Hewitt won 2 slams and was the youngest no 1 (until alcaraz recently) and was only 5'9
@@jahlu90nishoki got close at the same height someone in the 5'9 to 5'10 range could win a major but he would have to have extreme athleticism think nfl wr genetics
The Chang v Edberg 1992 US Open semifinal is still the longest match in US Open history, at 5 hrs and 26 minutes. I think that is important info to mention.
He was my favorite player, he would run everything down and I loved that about him and tried to do the same when I played.
i watched him play in London, as short as me around 1.7m but super fast, could generate good power and really good hands. His mentality was second to none, doggedly dogged and a very quick thinker
Considered his small size, he has accomplished a lot in tennis.
Another legend... miss seeing Chang on TV.
Oh I loved watching Chang play. He was my favourite male player.
Thank you for sharing. A great guy!!😊😊
He ran everything down; he was a counter puncher. That was his game; no more, no less. Often good enough, but sometimes not enough.
He's one of the hardest working tennis professionals. He never left anything on the court. It eventually to a toll on his body. He was never the same after his injury. He lost his speed and power but was ever bit as cerebral as before. I often wondered how he'd be if he didn't get injured.
Agreed. That’s why the serve is such a valued weapon in men’s tennis. You need to be able to win a percentage of quick points without having to grind through a best of five set match over a two week tournament.
He was the first tennis player. I was a fan of.
Chang needs more credit for inspiring so many Asian kids (and likely other kids as well) to play tennis. There were so few POCs tennis pros during the 90s.
Breaking the mould. Love it. A real trailblazer. Credit to him, his family and all of the people that believed where others didn't.
Albert Yu, Michael Chang is one my inspirations too!!!
My favorite player of all-time❤ Greatest footwork tennis has ever seen💯
The accomplishment of Michael Chang was huge! 15th seed and defeated legendary players, Lendl and Edberg. And they were on form and were not hampered with any injury, etc. Chang's use of stamina, speed and strategy gave inspiration to future players like Hingis, Hewitt, Nadal, David Goffin, Olivier Rochus, etc. And the wave of female East Asian players, maybe even Western Asian players like Russia and Ukraine. Hingis definitely known for her strategic play and overall court smarts. Coincidentally, Hingis enjoyed success early on much like Chang. Players who are not athletically gifted like Nadal, but gifted in other areas are more likely than not to enjoy success early on as teenagers as opposed to their mid twenties. But, if you take the gifts of Chang and put in the body of an athletically gifted player like Nadal...14 grand slam singles titles at the French Open and counting! If I'm not mistaken, players like Nadal and Hewitt have credited Chang as their inspiration as speed is one of their core weapons. Hingis used her smarts and anticipation to mimic a speedy tennis player like a Chang. What hurt Chang was the hip injury that he never really rebounded from. Chang has some very close matches with top contenders, but unforced errors at crucial moments which Chang did not make when he was 17 years old without the hip injury, had lead Chang not to win more grand slam singles titles. I wonder because Chang has to use so much energy to win matches in his 20s, that Chang was not able to play doubles and win grand slam doubles and/or mixed titles? Hmmm...and Hingis never really rebounded from her ligament injury. Hingis should have won 1997, 1999 French Open Finals, and especially, 2002 Australian Open Final.
Nadals not athletically gifted? Lol.
Every child picking up tennis MUST watch Chang. Period. Otherwise, they're missing out on some extremely key lessons in sports, and worse yet, in life.
Golden era of tennis... chang, agassi, sampras, courier, edberg... prince graphite versus wilson pro staff.
People say Chang was a pusher but 1996 till the end of his career, his game consisted more of all out attack with his forehand. He was doing very well on slower hard court like Indian Wells where he had time to run around his backhand to hit inside out forehands. It was actually sometimes frustrating to see him commit way more unforced errors during that time of his career especially after he missed out on the number 1 ranking for a passing shot he missed during match point.
Michael Chang was to tennis, what Ayrton Senna was to F1. Senna went after every opportunity, after every gap, fighting tooth and nail for every corner. Likewise, Chang never gave up a point, chasing every ball until it was impossible to get to. Their belief in God, drove them both to do their absolute best. It was said of Senna, that he was a danger to the other drivers, because he drove like death didn't matter. Michael Chang was a joy to watch on court. God bless him and his family.
How do you play each other 31 times but hold a 12-8 lead ??
Hahaha just looked on the comments to see if anyone noticed. He meant to say 12-9 for Edberg, for a total of 21 matches
They draw 11 times
Reference: I'm a chess player
He was not only very good but excellent....one of best of the great era of the late 80's to the 90's. If court was as slow like they are today, he would have won 3 or 4 more Grand Slam...at least! I was a big fan !
Michael Chang is world class good.
Will always be my hero!
Chang had a good backhand and was very good at rallying. If he was better at anything over others, it was his speed. You don’t get to his level on will alone though. He was still very talented. Just never got to number one.
Michael Chan was a great player like the way he played because he gave you 100%. Just like Connor's they gave you 100% on every shot
As a kid growing up Chang was the real deal. He did not have a big serve, was not tall but his counterpunching game appealed to me. Similar was the case of Lleyton Hewitt. Chang gave us a tutorial on how to maximize your potential. If not for Sampras would have added to his Grand Slam tally.
Underrated player
ahahah great name "bouse master" 😁
Wow, 8-12 vs Sampras head to head, that’s pretty impressive.
Wonderful Tennis
Player!!!💐💐💐💐💫
All of those guys from that era could still be Top 10 today.
Will you do a video covering Andy Murray when he has retired going through his career?
3:58 now we know who Carlos learned that trick from.
He was a scrappy player. Hustled for every ball. Played well enough to knock off a high-seeded player on that player's way to the semi-finals. Shorter players have to play that much harder and their bodies wear out earlier in their careers. Still, a formidable opponent. I watched him play tough matches where he prevailed, but it still amazes me that he had such stats against the greats.
Please do McEnroe next
Anyone know how fast Michael was in the 100 yard / meter dash ? It appears he had world class speed !
Wasn’t that Lendl quote said to Agassi? Maybe I’m remembering wrong
"they would go on to play 31 times", "with Edberg leading 12-8", ...
Totally inspirational to people, especially Asians, b\c tennis you think is dominated by really tall Europeans (and Americans). Mike Chang, Li Na, (Bruce Lee, ...maybe Jeremy Lin.. he he). Back in the day I kicked an oversized Prince racket, an aluminum one, b\c Michael Chang used Prince. A group of kids in my neighborhood got into tennis around this same time, played until the sun went down or they turn the lights out.
My math is bad. How did he face edberg 30 times and be down 12-8?
OG Pusher
Wasn't he among the first to use extended racket ? Thanks for the great job you have done here. Really good to find this interesting topic here
That's right! I remember how the extended racket really helped his serve.
People dont appreciate how hard it is to compete at that level being only 5ft 8.
Wow...I'm today years old when I learned his name is Michael Chang and not Chan. My parents would pronounce his name with an accent so I legit thought it was Chan lol.
Michael Chang was 5' 9 so he was hardly short. I can hit a 120+ MPH serve and I am same height
he was fast, had a great lob, fun to watch played Lendl and Edberg tough - Chang was down 12- 8 to Sampras and 12 - 9 to Edberg that's pretty good
i wish i had half the competitiveness of mcenroe and the graciousness of chang.
the only thing that limits Michael Chang is his height. has he been 15 cm (6 inches taller), he would have won more grand slams for sure.
Unfortunately, After Chang, Sampras, Agassi, Courier, the US would see no dominant men players yet.
Does he still hood the record? Youngest winner in a grab slam event?
Rod Laver 5'7" and Ashleigh Barty 5'5" both legendary players.
Accept Islam
Edberg and Chang played 31 times and the head to head was 12-8? How does that work
Diego Schwartzmann still one of the best players in the game. Ash Barty retired at number one with one of the best serves on WTA's tour. Size isn't completely irrelevant, but if you can't move well on the court, size and serve doesn't matter.
Generally Asians are small ,but they ASIANS HAVE GREAT REFLEXES AND SPEED and that why they dominate badminton ,table tennis , kabaddi sports
How I wish he could win more than one grand slam .
yeah well Marcelos Rios, Nalbandian, and Mark Philippousis Zero
there are very few short players these days, Schwarzman is the only one in the top 20
He played atp tour finals so must have been in top 10 at least…
Amazing what he accomplished. I think he gave away some productive career time at the end by trying too hard to make his serve a weapon. His first serve % cratered and he became a victim to his second serve. But remarkable career nonetheless.
Eh? Does 12+8 = 31??
Nadal is basically the 2.0 version of Michael Chang.
He’s got his own YT channel: ruclips.net/user/TennisSpin
Chang and Edberg okayed 31 times, with Edberg leading 12-8? I’m no mathematician, but that doesn’t sound right lol
Chang faced Edberg 31 times and Edberg led the head to head 12-8. I feel like you’re trolling Asian watchers with your math!
During his 1989 Roland Garros winning run he left just 3 games to Sampras in the second round. All commentators stated that "this american (Sampras) plays a far too beautiful Tennis to win anything in his career" 😂😂😂😂
Good enough to be no 2 ranking and has one grand slam
He won one major.....
Well he played at the highest level and won titles and a slam....is that really a question?
The next generation of tennis players has not arrived yet?
Chang was fast but I never enjoyed watching him play. He was a pusher. He returned everything to his opponent but had no weapons other than his legs.
Chang had great return of serve. One of the best according to ATP statistics. The return of serve is the second most important shot in the game.
Wat u expect when he's undersized
Chang was about a modern day USTA 5.5
Can't be a top player with that size anymore.
Beautiful dim sim eater
chang nishioka same same
huh
different era though
their speed and power may be similar
but Chang in the 90s was exceptional
Nishioka in the modern era not so much
tennis has evolved
Is the voice over done by AI?
Nope
Super fast but cheap AF. Paid for stringing with a Big Bag of change
He was the Bruce Lee of tennis! 🤣🤣🤣
He was a one-hit wonder... After the French Open, he never won another Grand Slam, despite getting into several finals and trying out giant rackets.
That is actually better than most of the tour. How many well known tennis players have never won one? He may not be a great but he is an overachiever given his disadvantage in height and reach.
@@kweizi5712 Those "well-known but slamless players" will soon be forgotten. Chang is only remembered because of his lucky slam at the French.
@@jw999 Better lucky than never.
Not that good compared to the greats of that time period.
Sorry guys, but chang is overrated…
to be overrated, is to be rated overly high. He was never overrated, because of the shear fact that he was never rated too high to begin with.
MC = way over-rated