If you found my videos useful you can always buy me a coffee! 👉 www.buymeacoffee.com%2Fcrazytechlab&v=kE_vmGCq_E8 Buy the MSI MPG Z790 Carbon WiFi here - amzn.to/407ixgi Buy the Intel Core i5-13600K here - amzn.to/3JiYtRi
There's an easy way around the high temperatures: buy an LGA 1700 frame bracket (from Thermaltake for example). There are even some special ones for water coolers, depending on the water cooler manufacturer. The standard loading mechanism is fastening too tight, which bends the CPUs.
Do both, a good contact twixt cooler and CPU is a sensible starting point, mine running exactly the same settings and benchmark was 17°C cooler than he gets in the video with fancy liquid cooling, I on the other hand am using a sub £100 AIO (Arctic Liquid Freezer ii) my post overclock temps are better than his initial baseline temps. Don't underestimate the value of the Thermalright mount solution.
with MSI boards just set the lite load cpu setting in bios to level 9 or lower and the temps drop drastically.. mine peaks at 81c instead of 100C.. Intel stated the default level 12 is to high for this CPU... Other brands probably have the same setting under another name.. but MSI calls it Lite Load. This is all over on Reddit.
I'm currently running mine at 5.2 P Core and 4.0 E Core at 1.14v. This works fine for me atm as it idles and runs under load much cooler (70-71c in CB R23 @ 100%) than stock settings with some boost. Considering I mainly use my system for gaming and its 1440p anyway, and I have very warm ambient temps, this really meets my needs. To run cooler, lil bit faster and lesser power draw 🙂.
I'd suggest putting the E cores to 4.1 while using the same voltage. On mine at 5.3 P cores and 4.1 E cores my CB r23 scores 25400. The E cores really help in multi core apps.
You have an MSI board.. if you want just better temps.. change Lite Load to level 9 or 5 instead of level 12... Intel already stated 12 is too high! Huge temp drops.
So this is a 200MHz boost to the peak boost you’re seeing and a whole lot more to the all-core boost most likely and it will run cooler too. I’ve got this sample up to 5.7.
Great Video. It worked with my Gigabyte Z690 Board easily, but now i have an msi B760m Mortar Board here and i neither get the Ratio over 51 nor there is a Voltage override mode, only Offset. Now im lost😕
My i3 13600k runs at ~145W ~1.135V Under full load on R23 with scores of ~23k multi 2k single. 70°C max with a peerless asassin cooler (air) Do i need to push mlre power through it to boost performance? ive seen people saying 180-200W, how would i do that?
@@CrazyTechLab Sounds great. I couldn't help notice that Linus Tech Tips say that one should stay away from CPU Core Voltage Mode as seen in this video: ruclips.net/video/9b3JUiK1aWU/видео.html and yes I did hear that you said your method was the simplest way not the most efficient way, but is it bad ?
Do you have any similar videos to safely and easily overclock DDR4 RAM? I have 2 sticks of DDR4 3600 Mhz RAM paired to my 13600KF that I want to tweak safely.
To be honest there are far more limited performance gains for memory. The simplest way with DDR4 is to set it to 1.4v and raise the frequency. That’s usually enough for 200-600 MHz overclock but the problem is all memory sticks are different. If you buy a 13600K then most of them will be able to do the over clock that I’ve done in this video. Memory doesn’t work like that because underneath the chips change all the time and manufacturing and an over clock that works on one side of memory one week won’t work on a kit that’s bought in six months time. It’s more trial and error. You can easily increase the frequency by 200 MHz usually. Just make sure you stress test.
Can I apply these settings if I have a 750 watt power supply which is a 2021 Corsair rmx 2021 series. a Msi z690 pro-a. And a 360mm aio.or will I see issues if I copied your settings because I don’t want to copy what you got. and it breaks my system or turns my pc into a ticking time bomb. pls be quick to respond.My current gpu with this setup if important is a auto overclock and manual tuned memory ram rx6700xt
The settings should work but I cannot guarantee it will be stable as different motherboards work differently. However, this is a very safe voltage so it won't hurt to try
HORIBLE ADVICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ALMOST 80% OF TIME PC IS IN IDLE.... WHY DA FK FORCE CPU TO USE 1.2V INSTEAD OF 0.7V? Better to use offsets. than making static voltage, static freq and wasting energy. Not to mention you did not showed us stock score!!
Offsets are more complicated and completely defeat the point of this video which I stressed at length was going to be as simple as possible. I said clearly in the video that this is not the most efficient overclock. There are better ways and hundreds of videos how to do it that. but they require more settings to be tweaked. So no it’s not terrible advice. It’s exactly what I intended. Secondly while I didn’t show the initial score I mentioned it when retreating as being 23,000 with the final result around 2000 points higher than this.
imagine that..just 2 things to change and you gain much from this monster of cpu already.. thank you for letting the people who doesn't know anything about overclocking or afraid to do it
@@Key-z2x i have no clue to even set up bios, i had my friend help me with the setup, i built it but the computer stuff isn't me, i made sure the temps and fans were working properly, this video is perfect 10/10 for us non nerds :)
This is the best and most simple guide to OC your 13600K. Thanks a lot 🙏 I never thought that a 13th gen i5 would almost match last-gen’s i9 12900K in benchmarks. It’s a great chip if you control the voltage and have a decent cooling solution.
@@CrazyTechLabhey i have a question i have an KF version of the cpu and when i used 55 ratio it didn't show in cpu z afterwards if i try to change any other settings after setting p core ratio to 55 it just resets to auto
Thank you, great video. You kept it brief and simple! Have your tried Intel's XTU utility? It's my understanding that it applies the overclock settings upon windows launch vs BIOS. That make is much faster to try different settings and in the even of a crash the next reboot defaults to stock settings without the need of clearing CMOS/BIOS reset. Once you have a long history of being stable that's when you can choose to move the settings to BIOS. At least that's how I understand how it works. I'm awaiting on parts to do a I5 - 13600K build.
If you're willing to tweak, you'll most likely be able to get more out of the cpu, mine is able to do 5.6GHz all P cores and 6.2GHz on a single P core and 4.4GHz all E cores. I might have won silicon lottery, but it's always worth to tweak stuff, just don't mess with the voltage too hard :D
Be aware - MSI runs ridicolous voltages in their boards which lowers the CPU health. I crippled a Ryzen 5700G cos of that, which doesn't even run stock anymore. Also RAM is usually more unstable and needs more voltage on these boards.
MSI has a policy to provide voltage and ruin CPUS, I am a skylake x user, I know, how my cpu got screwed with bios updates, since earlier, on an older bios, voltages were so good, now, its +200 - 300mv for stock
I use to be able to set the multiplier above 51. I don’t know what happened but when I try 52 or higher it will flip back to 51 when I hit enter. I can over clock the Ecores though. Has anyone heard of this happening and how to fix it?
I've been able to stay stable at 5.6ghz on P-Cores, and 4.3 on my e-core @1.23v Temps are staying under 75c mind you I'm air-cooled. Thanks for this tutorial. Deff helped me dial in numbers that work best for me and gives me more than some wiggle room for extra performance out of this CPU. 👌
Nice... Best i've done so far is 5.5Ghz. Crashed when I tried to push it to 5.6Ghz... even with an increase in voltage to 1.35V. Guess my silicon isn't quite as good.
@nflikt I had to pull back form 5.6 to 5.5 for that reason, after a windows update for some reason when I'd benchmark in 3Dmark I'd crash before benchmark begins of course it's pushing 100% utilization but It was a very odd flip flop, I as well tried to increase voltage up to 1.375v and even beough down e-core. Onky way i was able to stick to 5.6 was when i stopped using the effeciency cores.. I've since upgraded to a 13700k and as well clocked it at 5.5ghz with 4.5ghz on e cores at 1.35v. Deff performance vs the 13600k is minimal but I can deff justify the extra $100 during games and workloads as it deff feels like it's far much less under pressure in terms of utilization
I've tried doing this but Cinebench multicore rest just would not run. Went back to my undervolted 1.14v at 5.2 P-core/4.0 E-core. I believe mine needs 1.25/1.26v to apply these settings as I've tried 1.22 and 1.23 still would crash Cinebench instantly. Reverting back to my old undervolt allowed Cinebench to run seamlessly.
Your score was well under my 13600k score I could tell by the length of the bar next to the 24k one above it.... I adjusted lite load to level 9 from default 12 and my cinebench score went up and my temps dropped nearly 20C peak as 81C was my hottest core. Intel confirmed motherboard makers have set the default to 12 which is to high and not needed.. also why the temps are stupid high on the New Intels.. everyone is saying they are designed to run this hot etc but they infact do NOT need to.
Hi, I tried these settings running an MSI Z790 PRO WIFI P, after I made the changes, cinebench will not run and it gives me an application error, I un-installed and reinstalled a few times. I'm wondering if the 1.2 voltage isn't enough for me to push 5.5ghz. What say you?
Hi thanks for this upload. Have they changed the voltage supplied by bios since you posted this? I'm getting pretty much the same score but at a max P core temp of 73°C (MSI Z690 Edge DDR4)
I crash when I apply 5.5 in xtu. But honestly at base speeds I score 24k in cinebench and thermal max is 80C with an air cooler, HwInfo64 shows no thermal throttling…. Confused why your hitting 90C with AIO
Must have lost the silicon lottery (kinda) was able to do 5.5 GHz on P cores and 4 GHz on E cores but only stable voltage 1.275V rock stable. Board is MSI z790 A pro wifi DDR4
thanx for the video - i am running this processor at audio workstation and looking for some single core improovements also latency related as ableton wont work so well with this processor - any help will be welcome thanx!
My 13600k needs 1.26V with LLC set to „Turbo“ (Gigabyte naming 🙄) to achieve 5.5 P, 4.4 E and 5.0 Ring speeds in R23. For CB2024 it needs 1.28V to run stable.
I haven't received my hardware yet so I'm not sure how it is on MSI boards, but one thing that was mentioned about ASUS boards is that, in the BIOS, it'll ask you what type of cooler you have. If you choose liquid, it will bump up the settings and you'll have issues with high temps. If you choose box or tower cooling, it becomes manageable. Not having done my new build yet, I don't know what kind of stock temps I'll be getting, but hopefully I won't be maxing out in Cinebench like that.
Bloody brilliant mate. Amazing video. This helps a lot. I got my 13600k just 3 days ago and was much worried why its running so hot. Surprised to find out that Overclocking actually helps with temps.
@@CrazyTechLab Agreed. Like out of curiosity on default clock speed of 5.1GHz, I tried to undervolt it to see how low can I get and I actually managed to get it stable at 1.150V. Ran Cinebench for 30min to stress test and it went well. And most amazing was the amount of temperature drops.
For MSI boards just change the Lite Load CPU setting in bios to level 9... some guys run much lower like level 5 and the temps drop drastically.. its not the overclock that made it cooler.. its the decrease in voltage..
Great vid! about to try this with my 13600k. Got a question regarding power plans - Do you use the 'Ultimate Performance' power plan when overclocking? I tried it in stock settings and it seems to disable cores clocking down on idle, although effective clock speed reads 0 and temps are still same on idle. Will using Ultimate Performance power plan while OC'ing be safe/beneficial or not recommended? Thanks!
I ran default settings and only changed the settings in the video. Ultimate performance usually opens the taps on power limits so may increase temps and power consumption. It shouldn’t have much benefit to overclocking with the settings we use as we’re just increasing the voltage and multiplier
@@CrazyTechLab I ended up using 'turbo ratio' OC setting for P cores and set by core usage manually to 55x for the range of loaded cores from 1-6, and 'all core' E cores at 43x. Using 'adaptive' voltage mode @ 1.25v (in bios) with CPU LLC at level 3 giving me 1.30-1.306v under load. Had 1-4 P-core usage at 57x and 5-6 P-core usage at 55x and although it seemed stable during Cinebench, OCCT, p95 small fft avx off, y cruncher tests, 3dmark & unigine loop runs, it eventually began crashing playing Spider-man remastered after I ran Windows Ultimate power plan which keeps static voltage and Core frequency, c states on though. My out of the box default settings was doing 1.37v on load and I thought that was high. Can't believe yours was pumping 1.41v for stock!! that's crazy. I've got MSI z790 tomahawk d5 btw.
How's the 13600k running now we know the issues with it? Mine has degraded over the 18 months I've had it. It started out happy at x53 multiplier, and I had to drop it back to x51 after about a year as it became unstable. I was never able to achieve any kind of undervolting, and now just for stock, it needs +0.75v at x51 because the microcode bug has literally fried it.
My CPU is currently running less than 2.5Ghz and is not stable going from 1.2Ghz to 2.4Ghz fluctuating often. I have the same CPU and PC feels slow but before the Ghz were higher at above 3 and pc was faster. Base speed is 3.5Ghz but it never went above 3Ghz. And now i see that i can overclock to above 5Ghz haha no wonder my pc feels slow when the cpu is running at less than 2.5ghz
My bios has different names for these things, I gave it a shot and got the core speed right but the core voltage was constantly changing and above 1.200, and cinebench wouldn’t even start so i switched back to default. Any help please?
My bios has different names for these things, I gave it a shot and got the core speed right but the core voltage was constantly changing and above 1.200, and cinebench wouldn’t even start so i switched back to default. Any help please?
One thing about the i5-14600kf is can get near 6ghz under 1.3v all P cores and at 5.8ghz all cores at 1.26v no core goes over 75c. (with 4.6ghz E-cores and 48x ring). This is also with a z790 but also exact same PC and tested different chips in the store to confirm
Thansk for this video ,mate! Have a 13600k with prime z790p d4. Tried to run 55 p core, and 41 e core with 1.25V actual vrm core voltage.. windows11 says me... nope :D what do u suggest , lower te p core or higher the voltage? Or should i try to keep vrm voltage on auto, and global voltage to adaptive, and start set a minus offset? Thanks a lot again.
Warzone 2 crashed on me ,i have the 6950xt any tips? Update: i put the voltage to 1.300 ,and it's working, can i lower it a bit ,or should i leave it ?
Always try for as low a voltage as possible. You’re not going to damage anything at all But not at the expense of games crashing. Stability comes first 😄
@@CrazyTechLab so I went as low as 1.10 when it crashed I put it to 1.15 hasn't crashed so far , I'm getting around 160 fps on warzone 2 and my GPU is not even overclocked.
Much thanks, was considering getting a 13900k for VR in flight sim. But will give OC a try first. I haven’t OCd since I had my 3570k (great cpu) a few years ago. VR in the Varjo Aero is a premium experience to say the keast, but keeping the visuals and a comfortable framerate requires squeezing every ounce of performance out of every piece of hardware.
It’s an option but not necessary. The whole point with this guide was to stick to just the multiplier and voltage keeping it to just two steps, which still results in big performance boosts.
Nice! Depending how the X3D chips go the 13600K will likely be my next CPU. Crazy power for the cash. Saw in your original review it was pretty overclockable but didn't realise it will actually run cooler! And as luck will have it, I am really liking the MSI Z790 ITX board too :) Great video as usual!
@@gergelykiss1142 in all tests 13600k is better, shut up already. also mboards and memory (for equal performance in tests) for ryzen are much more expensive
@@gergelykiss1142 Fwiw I had nothing but issues on my Ryzen 5XXX PC. Everything from terrible undervolting performance to TSC desync. Intel works out of the box and has a ton of headroom for OC/UV.
Hi. I am planning to use 13600K but should I change my PSU. Currently my set up is 5600X, 3060 twin edge, Deepcool AK620, PSU Bequiet 600W system power 9
cpuz has a user validator table with the top 5 users having clocked their 13600K's to over 8000mhz. most using msi godlike or rog apex, no doubt with good cooling
@@CrazyTechLab I was trying to find out the best bios settings to aid with lower idle and working temps, on essentially a near identical board (z690 carbon,13600K), 6000mts ram, peerless assassin air cooler (which runs cooler than the twin fan corsair aio previously did before it gave in to cautionary pump display issues, due to weak core to pump cables or the commander struggling itself after a couple of days of use). After a windows 11 install with the air cooler it ran at 32c idle, many installs later it's now at 38c. There does not seem to be additional services running but of course that doesn't account for win services and updates. It stays there. Some 3d software even when it's clearly struggling (no gpu yet) doesn't stretch the temp beyond 45c for some reason.. although prime95 with default settings does hit 100c as in your initial case. The hottest part of the board is easily the pch temp (60c idle,reported through fancontrol)
Depends on the system. If I dropped a 13900K in my system I’d likely get a higher score than with this CPU. The 13900K can hit 5.8GHz so it should be faster. It could have been the memory or cooling I was using
I did everything In the video but when I look at my task manager I’m not getting 5.5 ghz stable instead it dips to 3ghz sometimes and even 2ghz my board is a z690-pro a ddr4
Could be just Intel's turbo mode/power saving features when CPU is not at load. Try running Cinebench and monitor core usage on Coretemp (like in video) and Frequencies of each core on CPUZ by clicking on "core speed" to bring up all core speeds (like in video). If your temperatures are all below 90*C and all core speeds read 5486-5500mhz while the test is running then its fine. On idle it's supposed to come down and relax and voltage reduced accordingly.
Great video! Tried the same settings as best as I could determine on My Asrock Z790 Pro RS MB bios but it screwed up my system, would not even boot into the bios until I pulled the battery!
Quick question: After overclocking using BIOS the frequency stays fairly static (where before if under no load it would drop to say 2GHz) is there a way to change this? would it be altering the CV mode to adaptive? Using XTU it appears to regulate better.
It would be yes. This is a very simple guide on getting better results with a minimum of fuss so everyone can have a go. Adaptive mode is a step up in complexity and precisely what I wanted to avoid but yes it can allow the CPU to downclock rather than sitting at the overclock.
Depends. 13600K is on a dead-end socket so while it will be faster than the 7600X for games, you can only upgrade to the 14th Gen CPUs from Intel and they're not really much of an upgrade. I'm assuming that you're coming from a much older PC than either Intel LGA1700 or AMD Socket AM5 and you're looking to buy a new motherboard for those CPUs?
@@CrazyTechLab no, i haven't any old desktop i am buying new desktop pc for gaming but i had big confusion in these two cpu intel i5 13600k and d r5 7600x which best for gaming and bettter in 1% lows.. please tell me deeply about those cpus please I'll pay you some bucks, and it me help me a lot.
@@goluop0982 Is the 13600K your max budget? Because an even better CPU would be the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and that would also mean you're buying into a platform that has a CPU upgrade path. The 13600K would be better all round than the 7600X. Also depends what graphics card you have or plan on getting
@@CrazyTechLab gpu for now is rx 6750 xt or rtx 3060 ti using for gaming 2 years around 2026 then which I buy One more thing that i have max budget for intel i5 13600k then what should I take for only gaming skip amd r7 7800 xt because of my low budget
@@goluop0982 Definitely Ryzen 5 7600X tbh. There's very little difference between it and the 13600K in games even with a 4090 and at low resolutions. So I'd go with the 7600X, a cheap Socket AM5 motherboard and 6400 DDR5 memory
That’s a good score! Yeah the idea with this guide was a simple stable overclock with just one or two settings. Can appreciate there a lot more you can do. What stuff did you tweak?
I can run mine at 5.5 4.3 and temps barley go above 60 Celsius, using a NH-15 I think its called (the black Noctula) havent touched voltages just changed clock speeds. Tested it with £D marks CPU test, got top 1% in the world and 4th in the UK made me wonder how well it could do if I knew what I was actually doing
how can you ppl get so low voltages with theses high speeds, 1.2v is only stable with the normal speeds and temps 55/60. the max i could get without crash is 1.34v and 5.3ghz like wtf??? (tried to see if could get lower with xmp disable but also no) temps also don't go past 80, i never go beyond 1.35v but i surely can increase that. if i auto oc with oc tuner (asus) puts in 5.2ghz and 1.390 but this is crazy for a pc that is always on basically
Im running MSI Z790-A Pro WiFi, but im unsure if the CPU Lite Load is messing with this when I try doing the same thing ive had issues. What did you use for CPU Lite Load for this? I also have the 13600kf tho if that makes any difference which I would think its not really any huge difference when it comes to voltages or am I wrong?
Well I just got mine and well I have good cooling and running default clock with xmp was only getting 70's, but I put it at 1.2 volts and put mine to test at 5.3 and it hit 90 as a max but it didn't stay there and the voltage was like stock it never stuck somewhere around 1.37 or something. Now this was each with the 10 min timers. If you let yours go 10 minutes what is your temps on the 5.5 you are running thank you.. ps. I'm using the cinebench r24 I just saw, and also when I pick no testing duration it seems it just keeps going? It doesn't stop at one minute and it doesn't show me a comparison of other cpus. I did get a test result on my 5.3 around 1900+ forgot exactly, but I know it was in the 1900's @ 5.3 I also noticed on this gigabyte board changing this core voltage to 1.2 doesn't stick, I read somewhere it's probably due to llc, but for us that the voltage isn't sticking what can we do to force it?
heei nice dude but i dont understand this why are the clock speeds not running low on that software i have that same problem and i se by others that i runs lower is that a motherboard problem becouse i want to get that fixed it is possible>>???
These settings caused an unbalanced system for me unfortunatly. During a passmark test i got BSOD's due to high temps on the CPU. Lowering the ratio to 53 didn't cause any problems so far. I have a Be Quiet Dark Rock Pro 4 CPU-cooler and a few very good Be Quiet Silent Wings 4 case fans. Maybe water cooling is needed to get higher results.
I had a similar issue with my 9600k a few years ago, I replaced the DR4 Pro with NH-D15, no issues. Of course there may be an element of silicon lottery at play too, but if you can accommodate a 280mm AIO I'd try that next.
If it’s due to the high temps, then just lower your voltage more then, maybe that means you have a good chip but a bad cooler as it should go to such high temps at 1.20V
Tysm for this video mine is coming in the mail with a z790 board and I got the ddr5 ram already my scout cooler will be the ak620 and my case is nzxt h510 elite so I wanted to make sure everything runs great I’m excited to swap out this i7 9700 it’s bottlenecking my Rx 6800 in a bit of games actually. But rn playing the hell outta starfeild haha
If you found my videos useful you can always buy me a coffee! 👉 www.buymeacoffee.com%2Fcrazytechlab&v=kE_vmGCq_E8
Buy the MSI MPG Z790 Carbon WiFi here - amzn.to/407ixgi
Buy the Intel Core i5-13600K here - amzn.to/3JiYtRi
Also worked with my i5 13600k + gigabyte aorus elite z790 board. P-Cores to 55 and E-Cores to 41 with Override & 1.2 Volt.
lol id wager 50$ these cores dont last 10 secs on p95 without avx
@@yoadknux was thinking the exact same thing when reading half these comments lmao
@@yoadknux Please prove that. I am just getting 13600k and gonna OC it. Just gathering info.
What are the p cores called on gigabyte
There's an easy way around the high temperatures: buy an LGA 1700 frame bracket (from Thermaltake for example). There are even some special ones for water coolers, depending on the water cooler manufacturer. The standard loading mechanism is fastening too tight, which bends the CPUs.
True, but you can lower them futher still if you reduce the voltage using a manual overclock like this
Do both, a good contact twixt cooler and CPU is a sensible starting point, mine running exactly the same settings and benchmark was 17°C cooler than he gets in the video with fancy liquid cooling, I on the other hand am using a sub £100 AIO (Arctic Liquid Freezer ii) my post overclock temps are better than his initial baseline temps. Don't underestimate the value of the Thermalright mount solution.
with MSI boards just set the lite load cpu setting in bios to level 9 or lower and the temps drop drastically.. mine peaks at 81c instead of 100C.. Intel stated the default level 12 is to high for this CPU... Other brands probably have the same setting under another name.. but MSI calls it Lite Load. This is all over on Reddit.
I'm currently running mine at 5.2 P Core and 4.0 E Core at 1.14v. This works fine for me atm as it idles and runs under load much cooler (70-71c in CB R23 @ 100%) than stock settings with some boost. Considering I mainly use my system for gaming and its 1440p anyway, and I have very warm ambient temps, this really meets my needs. To run cooler, lil bit faster and lesser power draw 🙂.
you talking about your settings or the video tutorial?
I'd suggest putting the E cores to 4.1 while using the same voltage. On mine at 5.3 P cores and 4.1 E cores my CB r23 scores 25400. The E cores really help in multi core apps.
I used Intel speed optimizer and it hits 25900 . 1 core x55 ,5 cores x54 , e cores x 41 .
How to set e cores to 4.1 ghz?
@Krzysztof S just change the ratio to 41, like you do with P cores, I have them at 5.3.
score of cpu voltage ?
i wanna set p core 5.3 and e core 3.9 for daily use.. how many score i set to the cpu voltage ? 1200 or les?
You have an MSI board.. if you want just better temps.. change Lite Load to level 9 or 5 instead of level 12... Intel already stated 12 is too high! Huge temp drops.
Mine runs at 5.3/4.1 out of the box on MSI A Pro D4. I will watch though.
So this is a 200MHz boost to the peak boost you’re seeing and a whole lot more to the all-core boost most likely and it will run cooler too. I’ve got this sample up to 5.7.
Great Video. It worked with my Gigabyte Z690 Board easily, but now i have an msi B760m Mortar Board here and i neither get the Ratio over 51 nor there is a Voltage override mode, only Offset. Now im lost😕
What is the p core called on a gigabyte motherboard
Golden sample.
My i3 13600k runs at ~145W ~1.135V Under full load on R23 with scores of ~23k multi 2k single. 70°C max with a peerless asassin cooler (air)
Do i need to push mlre power through it to boost performance? ive seen people saying 180-200W, how would i do that?
Why are your voltages no longer dropping at idle?
Thanks for a great video. Will this work on i5-14600KF as well ?
The 14th gen series should be just as good if not need less voltage. I’ll be doing another video for them soon
@@CrazyTechLab Sounds great.
I couldn't help notice that Linus Tech Tips say that one should stay away from CPU Core Voltage Mode as seen in this video: ruclips.net/video/9b3JUiK1aWU/видео.html and yes I did hear that you said your method was the simplest way not the most efficient way, but is it bad ?
Terrible, I followed the guide to the T. Blue screen right away. Now I have no internet/wifi options. Wtf
Do you have any similar videos to safely and easily overclock DDR4 RAM? I have 2 sticks of DDR4 3600 Mhz RAM paired to my 13600KF that I want to tweak safely.
To be honest there are far more limited performance gains for memory. The simplest way with DDR4 is to set it to 1.4v and raise the frequency. That’s usually enough for 200-600 MHz overclock but the problem is all memory sticks are different. If you buy a 13600K then most of them will be able to do the over clock that I’ve done in this video. Memory doesn’t work like that because underneath the chips change all the time and manufacturing and an over clock that works on one side of memory one week won’t work on a kit that’s bought in six months time. It’s more trial and error. You can easily increase the frequency by 200 MHz usually. Just make sure you stress test.
Doesn't work for me. It didn't even boot.
Thanks, how to overclock e cores my are working at 3,8
Can I do this with an Air Cooler? (thermalright peerless assassin se 120)
It should be okay but follow the guide and check your temperatures before and after.
@@CrazyTechLab thank you! Do I need to do anything with CPU Lite Mode? It's currently on mode 8 or 9
does it works with b760 aorus elite ax ?
@@FireVision No sadly you need a Z series motherboard for that to work
@@CrazyTechLab so I can do it with z790 tomahawk or tuf z790 gaming plus wifi ?
@FireVision Tomahawk would be fine. Asus TUF these settings may not be stable as Asus often configures its BIOS slightly differently
Can I apply these settings if I have a 750 watt power supply which is a 2021 Corsair rmx 2021 series. a Msi z690 pro-a. And a 360mm aio.or will I see issues if I copied your settings because I don’t want to copy what you got. and it breaks my system or turns my pc into a ticking time bomb. pls be quick to respond.My current gpu with this setup if important is a auto overclock and manual tuned memory ram rx6700xt
Yes that will be absolutely fine
I HAVE SAME I5 BUT GIGABYTE Z790 GAMING AX SHOULD MAKE SAME? TO OVERLOCK TILL 5.5
The settings should work but I cannot guarantee it will be stable as different motherboards work differently. However, this is a very safe voltage so it won't hurt to try
I have the same MB gigabyte gaming X AX. Did the settings work okay?
@@robertjohn2249 nope bro crash i let default
Im never buy gigabyte agaain
@@gerkusianamana Me to. Next time Asus or MSI
I have 13600k 5.5 p-core, 4.4 e-core ring 4.5. DDR 5 6600 cl34. And cinebench result 26700. How you make 25000?
You just answered your own question. Because you overclocked the e cores. I didn’t. You adjusted the ring. I didn’t. and use faster memory than I did.
@@CrazyTechLab thats fair:)
@@evilash6010 That’s a good climb up though. Shows that overclocking the e cores should be the next step for sure!
I started getting blue screens....
i got it stable at 1.3 v @ 5.5
override mode, really? Such a bad guide.
HORIBLE ADVICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ALMOST 80% OF TIME PC IS IN IDLE.... WHY DA FK FORCE CPU TO USE 1.2V INSTEAD OF 0.7V? Better to use offsets. than making static voltage, static freq and wasting energy. Not to mention you did not showed us stock score!!
Offsets are more complicated and completely defeat the point of this video which I stressed at length was going to be as simple as possible. I said clearly in the video that this is not the most efficient overclock. There are better ways and hundreds of videos how to do it that. but they require more settings to be tweaked. So no it’s not terrible advice. It’s exactly what I intended. Secondly while I didn’t show the initial score I mentioned it when retreating as being 23,000 with the final result around 2000 points higher than this.
@@CrazyTechLab dont listen to him..this worked perfectly on my msi z790-a pro ddr4 board
imagine that..just 2 things to change and you gain much from this monster of cpu already.. thank you for letting the people who doesn't know anything about overclocking or afraid to do it
No, this is some lazy overclocking, bro's leaving out like 20%
@@Key-z2xhe says that’s not what this is about lol…
@@Key-z2x i have no clue to even set up bios, i had my friend help me with the setup, i built it but the computer stuff isn't me, i made sure the temps and fans were working properly, this video is perfect 10/10 for us non nerds :)
This is the best and most simple guide to OC your 13600K. Thanks a lot 🙏
I never thought that a 13th gen i5 would almost match last-gen’s i9 12900K in benchmarks. It’s a great chip if you control the voltage and have a decent cooling solution.
Thanks dude! That was the goal! Plenty more settings you can tweak but it’s all about getting you hooked with something safe and easy to follow.
@@CrazyTechLabhey i have a question i have an KF version of the cpu and when i used 55 ratio it didn't show in cpu z afterwards if i try to change any other settings after setting p core ratio to 55 it just resets to auto
@@skakuneu Hi what motherboard do you have?
@@CrazyTechLab a MAG B760 TOMAHAWK WIFI DDR4
@@skakuneu unfortunately you need a Z690 or Z790 chipset motherboard for overclocking. The B760 doesn’t support it 😕
Thank you, great video. You kept it brief and simple! Have your tried Intel's XTU utility? It's my understanding that it applies the overclock settings upon windows launch vs BIOS. That make is much faster to try different settings and in the even of a crash the next reboot defaults to stock settings without the need of clearing CMOS/BIOS reset. Once you have a long history of being stable that's when you can choose to move the settings to BIOS. At least that's how I understand how it works. I'm awaiting on parts to do a I5 - 13600K build.
If you're willing to tweak, you'll most likely be able to get more out of the cpu, mine is able to do 5.6GHz all P cores and 6.2GHz on a single P core and 4.4GHz all E cores.
I might have won silicon lottery, but it's always worth to tweak stuff, just don't mess with the voltage too hard :D
Does disabling E cores save power and increase overclocking headroom ?
hey! My pc is not booting up even at 1.35 volts. I have rog strix z79. could u guide me accorindgly.
@@asawalwarraich Can’t guarantee these settings will work on an Asus board sorry!
Be aware - MSI runs ridicolous voltages in their boards which lowers the CPU health. I crippled a Ryzen 5700G cos of that, which doesn't even run stock anymore. Also RAM is usually more unstable and needs more voltage on these boards.
MSI has a policy to provide voltage and ruin CPUS, I am a skylake x user, I know, how my cpu got screwed with bios updates, since earlier, on an older bios, voltages were so good, now, its +200 - 300mv for stock
Damn no wonder i need dram volt 1.5 to run 3600mhz 😮
I wouldn’t run these settings my Games all crash now just keep the auto settings and OC your GPU….
I use to be able to set the multiplier above 51. I don’t know what happened but when I try 52 or higher it will flip back to 51 when I hit enter. I can over clock the Ecores though. Has anyone heard of this happening and how to fix it?
@@Ahmad_SyaI ran fine with 1.35 volt? At 3600
I've been able to stay stable at 5.6ghz on P-Cores, and 4.3 on my e-core @1.23v Temps are staying under 75c mind you I'm air-cooled. Thanks for this tutorial. Deff helped me dial in numbers that work best for me and gives me more than some wiggle room for extra performance out of this CPU. 👌
can i ask what’s ur cpu air cooler?
@heyitsnotmars
I was running a Cooler Master Hyper212.
But now,
I'm using a DeepCool LT520 AIO. Deff a solid cooler. 👌
Nice... Best i've done so far is 5.5Ghz. Crashed when I tried to push it to 5.6Ghz... even with an increase in voltage to 1.35V. Guess my silicon isn't quite as good.
@nflikt I had to pull back form 5.6 to 5.5 for that reason, after a windows update for some reason when I'd benchmark in 3Dmark I'd crash before benchmark begins of course it's pushing 100% utilization but It was a very odd flip flop, I as well tried to increase voltage up to 1.375v and even beough down e-core. Onky way i was able to stick to 5.6 was when i stopped using the effeciency cores.. I've since upgraded to a 13700k and as well clocked it at 5.5ghz with 4.5ghz on e cores at 1.35v. Deff performance vs the 13600k is minimal but I can deff justify the extra $100 during games and workloads as it deff feels like it's far much less under pressure in terms of utilization
@TruePlatform Oh it could very well be an update. I had a few issues with my 14th gen testing last week and it was software related!
I've tried doing this but Cinebench multicore rest just would not run. Went back to my undervolted 1.14v at 5.2 P-core/4.0 E-core. I believe mine needs 1.25/1.26v to apply these settings as I've tried 1.22 and 1.23 still would crash Cinebench instantly. Reverting back to my old undervolt allowed Cinebench to run seamlessly.
Thanks Man, this is the best overclock video of this processor. Please do an overclock of i7-13700k processor
Your score was well under my 13600k score I could tell by the length of the bar next to the 24k one above it.... I adjusted lite load to level 9 from default 12 and my cinebench score went up and my temps dropped nearly 20C peak as 81C was my hottest core. Intel confirmed motherboard makers have set the default to 12 which is to high and not needed.. also why the temps are stupid high on the New Intels.. everyone is saying they are designed to run this hot etc but they infact do NOT need to.
13600(kf) can do this?
@@alltimelegendfps9270 It's the same CPU, It's just that KF doesn't have integrated graphics.
Please post an overclocking guide for the 13700k as well. It'll be helpful. I couldn't locate another video that was this simple.
I think 5.5ghz all core @ 1.2v was a bit aggressive for the masses.
June 2023, using 13600k and a Gigabyte Z690 Aorus Elite, my default Vcore is around 1.2V and is not stable for 5.5Ghz.
how you know
how many PSU watts did you use while doing overclock? Im currently using 850w so im hesitant to do overclocking.
I got to 5.7GHz and more voltage and my system was only using 390W under load. 850W PSU will be fine
@@CrazyTechLab sir this is all my component
Cpu: i5 13600k,
Gpu: Aorus master 3090,
Mobo: Asus Rog Strix Z690-G
Memory: Kingston gen4 m.2 (500GB), Samsung gen3 m.2 (256GB), 1TB Toshiba HDD, 500gb HWST HDD
Ram: ddr5 Kingston 8x2 16GB
Aio: Tri-Fan Id cooling
Fans: 7pcs 120mm Fan ID cooling
well what could i say with a 550 Watts supply with 3080 'n full bore 13600k
Hi, I tried these settings running an MSI Z790 PRO WIFI P, after I made the changes, cinebench will not run and it gives me an application error, I un-installed and reinstalled a few times. I'm wondering if the 1.2 voltage isn't enough for me to push 5.5ghz. What say you?
Same problem for me with the msi pro z690-A wifi mobo
My Cinebench crashes @5.5Ghz unless I up the voltages to 1.3. and temps run in to the 90s. Any ideas?
Wow I'm totally clueless right now but would love to know more
This worked perfectly. Thank you
Glad to hear it!
Hi thanks for this upload. Have they changed the voltage supplied by bios since you posted this? I'm getting pretty much the same score but at a max P core temp of 73°C (MSI Z690 Edge DDR4)
hi just curious what u use for cpu cooler?
I'm assuming this is a very aggressive LLC setting, there is barely any vdroop, yet not mentioned at all, and 1.4 voltage at stock absolutely insane
Can I do this on a 13600KF processor?
Is there a difference in overclocking KF and K processors?
their identical basically , the f just doesn't have integrated graphics
I crash when I apply 5.5 in xtu. But honestly at base speeds I score 24k in cinebench and thermal max is 80C with an air cooler, HwInfo64 shows no thermal throttling…. Confused why your hitting 90C with AIO
Must have lost the silicon lottery (kinda) was able to do 5.5 GHz on P cores and 4 GHz on E cores but only stable voltage 1.275V rock stable. Board is MSI z790 A pro wifi DDR4
Nice, good job and great board
love your Cosmo benchmark set up, thx 4 the info
thanx for the video - i am running this processor at audio workstation and looking for some single core improovements also latency related as ableton wont work so well with this processor - any help will be welcome thanx!
IF any of you are reading this , Please post here your BEFORE and AFTER CPU temperature reading. I would love to see other readings. Thank you :)
🔥❄
My 13600k needs 1.26V with LLC set to „Turbo“ (Gigabyte naming 🙄) to achieve 5.5 P, 4.4 E and 5.0 Ring speeds in R23. For CB2024 it needs 1.28V to run stable.
I haven't received my hardware yet so I'm not sure how it is on MSI boards, but one thing that was mentioned about ASUS boards is that, in the BIOS, it'll ask you what type of cooler you have. If you choose liquid, it will bump up the settings and you'll have issues with high temps. If you choose box or tower cooling, it becomes manageable.
Not having done my new build yet, I don't know what kind of stock temps I'll be getting, but hopefully I won't be maxing out in Cinebench like that.
When I try to adjust the Core frequencies manually, they always revert to 5.1ghz. I can't adjust it manually at all.
Which motherboard do you have?
@@CrazyTechLab I have the same issue on a Asus prime b660m-A WiFi D4 motherboard
@@kentika378 Unfortunately you need Z690 or Z790 chipset motherboards to allow overclocking as we’ve shown in this guide.
Looks very easy but it seems I have a complete messed up sample. Mine can't even run stable with 5300 at 1,275 v
Did you modify Lite Load in some way?
mine can just baarely do 5.2 at 1.22V. I guess I'm gonna need a massive cooler in order to do any OC at all
great. 26068 Points CB R23 . on 650gramms of air . Matterhorn 210 Watt Cooler. 5.4Ghz - 4.3 . AVX 1 . seeing 1.285 Volts then.
Bloody brilliant mate. Amazing video.
This helps a lot. I got my 13600k just 3 days ago and was much worried why its running so hot.
Surprised to find out that Overclocking actually helps with temps.
I was too tbh! It's a simple way to cut temps but even if you can't hit 5.5GHz, its still worth doing to lower temps
@@CrazyTechLab Agreed.
Like out of curiosity on default clock speed of 5.1GHz, I tried to undervolt it to see how low can I get and I actually managed to get it stable at 1.150V. Ran Cinebench for 30min to stress test and it went well. And most amazing was the amount of temperature drops.
@@sabyfoz538 Nice! It will be interesting to see what 14th gen can do as well.
For MSI boards just change the Lite Load CPU setting in bios to level 9... some guys run much lower like level 5 and the temps drop drastically.. its not the overclock that made it cooler.. its the decrease in voltage..
Great vid! about to try this with my 13600k. Got a question regarding power plans - Do you use the 'Ultimate Performance' power plan when overclocking? I tried it in stock settings and it seems to disable cores clocking down on idle, although effective clock speed reads 0 and temps are still same on idle.
Will using Ultimate Performance power plan while OC'ing be safe/beneficial or not recommended?
Thanks!
I ran default settings and only changed the settings in the video. Ultimate performance usually opens the taps on power limits so may increase temps and power consumption. It shouldn’t have much benefit to overclocking with the settings we use as we’re just increasing the voltage and multiplier
@@CrazyTechLab I ended up using 'turbo ratio' OC setting for P cores and set by core usage manually to 55x for the range of loaded cores from 1-6, and 'all core' E cores at 43x. Using 'adaptive' voltage mode @ 1.25v (in bios) with CPU LLC at level 3 giving me 1.30-1.306v under load.
Had 1-4 P-core usage at 57x and 5-6 P-core usage at 55x and although it seemed stable during Cinebench, OCCT, p95 small fft avx off, y cruncher tests, 3dmark & unigine loop runs, it eventually began crashing playing Spider-man remastered after I ran Windows Ultimate power plan which keeps static voltage and Core frequency, c states on though.
My out of the box default settings was doing 1.37v on load and I thought that was high. Can't believe yours was pumping 1.41v for stock!! that's crazy. I've got MSI z790 tomahawk d5 btw.
Im owner of I5 13600k and thanks for the guide. 👍
Hey my setup msi pro z790-a ddr4 3600mhz( 4x8 32gb) I had to give at least 1.25V to run it at 5.5 if I give less voltage it throws to desktop in games
How's the 13600k running now we know the issues with it? Mine has degraded over the 18 months I've had it. It started out happy at x53 multiplier, and I had to drop it back to x51 after about a year as it became unstable. I was never able to achieve any kind of undervolting, and now just for stock, it needs +0.75v at x51 because the microcode bug has literally fried it.
My CPU is currently running less than 2.5Ghz and is not stable going from 1.2Ghz to 2.4Ghz fluctuating often. I have the same CPU and PC feels slow but before the Ghz were higher at above 3 and pc was faster. Base speed is 3.5Ghz but it never went above 3Ghz. And now i see that i can overclock to above 5Ghz haha no wonder my pc feels slow when the cpu is running at less than 2.5ghz
My bios has different names for these things, I gave it a shot and got the core speed right but the core voltage was constantly changing and above 1.200, and cinebench wouldn’t even start so i switched back to default. Any help please?
My bios has different names for these things, I gave it a shot and got the core speed right but the core voltage was constantly changing and above 1.200, and cinebench wouldn’t even start so i switched back to default. Any help please?
Very nice video dude! Congrats from Brazil
horible video with horible advice!
One thing about the i5-14600kf is can get near 6ghz under 1.3v all P cores and at 5.8ghz all cores at 1.26v no core goes over 75c. (with 4.6ghz E-cores and 48x ring). This is also with a z790 but also exact same PC and tested different chips in the store to confirm
That's good to know!
Most performance gain is from cache and ram OC.
Thansk for this video ,mate! Have a 13600k with prime z790p d4. Tried to run 55 p core, and 41 e core with 1.25V actual vrm core voltage.. windows11 says me... nope :D what do u suggest , lower te p core or higher the voltage? Or should i try to keep vrm voltage on auto, and global voltage to adaptive, and start set a minus offset? Thanks a lot again.
unstable on 5.5 GHz 1.2v, crashing game after 10 seconds (z790 tomahawk)
Warzone 2 crashed on me ,i have the 6950xt any tips?
Update: i put the voltage to 1.300 ,and it's working, can i lower it a bit ,or should i leave it ?
Always try for as low a voltage as possible. You’re not going to damage anything at all But not at the expense of games crashing. Stability comes first 😄
@@CrazyTechLab ok thanks, and should I lower it down by how many number?
@@CrazyTechLab I'm sorry for the noob question I'm super new at this 😅
@@slysta3232Not at all. You're the very person I aimed this video at. Overclocking is fun and safe!
@@CrazyTechLab so I went as low as 1.10 when it crashed I put it to 1.15 hasn't crashed so far , I'm getting around 160 fps on warzone 2 and my GPU is not even overclocked.
Much thanks, was considering getting a 13900k for VR in flight sim. But will give OC a try first. I haven’t OCd since I had my 3570k (great cpu) a few years ago. VR in the Varjo Aero is a premium experience to say the keast, but keeping the visuals and a comfortable framerate requires squeezing every ounce of performance out of every piece of hardware.
Oooh. Very nice! I’m a big flight sim fan. Which one would you be using?
Thanks for the video, I'm just interested as to why you did not max the power limits? Is this not neccessary?
It’s an option but not necessary. The whole point with this guide was to stick to just the multiplier and voltage keeping it to just two steps, which still results in big performance boosts.
@@CrazyTechLab I thought that may be the case but thought I'd check. Thanks for the video and the reply!
Can I overclock with a thermalright peerless assassin cpu cooler? Every overclock video has liquid cooling is why I'm asking
Nice! Depending how the X3D chips go the 13600K will likely be my next CPU. Crazy power for the cash. Saw in your original review it was pretty overclockable but didn't realise it will actually run cooler! And as luck will have it, I am really liking the MSI Z790 ITX board too :) Great video as usual!
Crazy power? A 7700 better for gaming and draw less power.
@@gergelykiss1142 in all tests 13600k is better, shut up already. also mboards and memory (for equal performance in tests) for ryzen are much more expensive
@@gergelykiss11427700 costs more and isn’t even supposed to be the 13600k’s equivalent
@@2saw 😂😂cost £10 more and it comes with a cooler woooow. And better in gaming than the 13700k wooooow. Crazy isn’t it?
@@gergelykiss1142 Fwiw I had nothing but issues on my Ryzen 5XXX PC. Everything from terrible undervolting performance to TSC desync. Intel works out of the box and has a ton of headroom for OC/UV.
Hi. I am planning to use 13600K but should I change my PSU.
Currently my set up is 5600X, 3060 twin edge, Deepcool AK620, PSU Bequiet 600W system power 9
nope. running a cx550M here, paired with 3080. 13600k full-bore - not a problem. It's running cool actually
I have on my i5 13600k on pcore 5.4ghz and ecore 4.3ghz with 1.220v on p and e core.
cpuz has a user validator table with the top 5 users having clocked their 13600K's to over 8000mhz. most using msi godlike or rog apex, no doubt with good cooling
And more than just two settings and not a super easy overclock that anyone can do with half decent cooling like this one 😉
@@CrazyTechLab I was trying to find out the best bios settings to aid with lower idle and working temps, on essentially a near identical board (z690 carbon,13600K), 6000mts ram, peerless assassin air cooler (which runs cooler than the twin fan corsair aio previously did before it gave in to cautionary pump display issues, due to weak core to pump cables or the commander struggling itself after a couple of days of use).
After a windows 11 install with the air cooler it ran at 32c idle, many installs later it's now at 38c. There does not seem to be additional services running but of course that doesn't account for win services and updates. It stays there. Some 3d software even when it's clearly struggling (no gpu yet) doesn't stretch the temp beyond 45c for some reason.. although prime95 with default settings does hit 100c as in your initial case. The hottest part of the board is easily the pch temp (60c idle,reported through fancontrol)
will it survive the test in prime95? What mode do you have with CPU LCC?
How come you are able to get a higher CB23 Single thread score from 13600k compared to 13900k? Does 13900k not OC to 6.1?
Depends on the system. If I dropped a 13900K in my system I’d likely get a higher score than with this CPU. The 13900K can hit 5.8GHz so it should be faster. It could have been the memory or cooling I was using
I did everything In the video but when I look at my task manager I’m not getting 5.5 ghz stable instead it dips to 3ghz sometimes and even 2ghz my board is a z690-pro a ddr4
Could be just Intel's turbo mode/power saving features when CPU is not at load. Try running Cinebench and monitor core usage on Coretemp (like in video) and Frequencies of each core on CPUZ by clicking on "core speed" to bring up all core speeds (like in video). If your temperatures are all below 90*C and all core speeds read 5486-5500mhz while the test is running then its fine. On idle it's supposed to come down and relax and voltage reduced accordingly.
It’s fine now I don’t get 5.5ghz exactly but I’m always at 4.8 ghz or higher now
Great video! Tried the same settings as best as I could determine on My Asrock Z790 Pro RS MB bios but it screwed up my system, would not even boot into the bios until I pulled the battery!
Same here
Same to me unfortunately. Glad I have clear cmos button on motherboard
Quick question: After overclocking using BIOS the frequency stays fairly static (where before if under no load it would drop to say 2GHz) is there a way to change this? would it be altering the CV mode to adaptive? Using XTU it appears to regulate better.
It would be yes. This is a very simple guide on getting better results with a minimum of fuss so everyone can have a go. Adaptive mode is a step up in complexity and precisely what I wanted to avoid but yes it can allow the CPU to downclock rather than sitting at the overclock.
HELP when I change my pcore ratio the number does not set
Which motherboard do you have?
Which prossesor should I buy for gaming intel i5 13600k vs amd Rayzn r5 7600x
Depends. 13600K is on a dead-end socket so while it will be faster than the 7600X for games, you can only upgrade to the 14th Gen CPUs from Intel and they're not really much of an upgrade. I'm assuming that you're coming from a much older PC than either Intel LGA1700 or AMD Socket AM5 and you're looking to buy a new motherboard for those CPUs?
@@CrazyTechLab no, i haven't any old desktop i am buying new desktop pc for gaming but i had big confusion in these two cpu intel i5 13600k and d r5 7600x which best for gaming and bettter in 1% lows.. please tell me deeply about those cpus please I'll pay you some bucks, and it me help me a lot.
@@goluop0982 Is the 13600K your max budget? Because an even better CPU would be the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and that would also mean you're buying into a platform that has a CPU upgrade path. The 13600K would be better all round than the 7600X. Also depends what graphics card you have or plan on getting
@@CrazyTechLab gpu for now is rx 6750 xt or rtx 3060 ti using for gaming 2 years around 2026 then which I buy
One more thing that i have max budget for intel i5 13600k then what should I take for only gaming skip amd r7 7800 xt because of my low budget
@@goluop0982 Definitely Ryzen 5 7600X tbh. There's very little difference between it and the 13600K in games even with a 4090 and at low resolutions. So I'd go with the 7600X, a cheap Socket AM5 motherboard and 6400 DDR5 memory
didn't work for me would not boot to windows, I went back to normal settings
1.200v not working with my cpu it crashes as soon as Windows boots up any tips?
Mobo: Gigabyte Z690 Gaming X
Xmp enabled
LLC set to low
This will only work on MSI boards as other settings may be different.
Damn, I'd be worried about running 90 degrees on my CPU for long periods of time. That's hot!!!
Another reason to manually overclock it - it was a lot cooler afterwards
Hey man, would this OC be fine if I was running the 13600k but with a ddr4 board. Specifically, the nzxt n5 z690?
T.I.A!
You can try but might not be stable. Different manufacturers apply different voltages. Won’t do any harm to try though.
@CrazyTechLab Thanks bro. Good stuff 👌
I run mine at 5.4 and get a score of 25500, but I also edited many more options compared to what was done here...
That’s a good score! Yeah the idea with this guide was a simple stable overclock with just one or two settings. Can appreciate there a lot more you can do. What stuff did you tweak?
I couldn’t even boot windows with this configuration
I can run mine at 5.5 4.3 and temps barley go above 60 Celsius, using a NH-15 I think its called (the black Noctula) havent touched voltages just changed clock speeds. Tested it with £D marks CPU test, got top 1% in the world and 4th in the UK made me wonder how well it could do if I knew what I was actually doing
how can you ppl get so low voltages with theses high speeds, 1.2v is only stable with the normal speeds and temps 55/60. the max i could get without crash is 1.34v and 5.3ghz like wtf??? (tried to see if could get lower with xmp disable but also no) temps also don't go past 80, i never go beyond 1.35v but i surely can increase that. if i auto oc with oc tuner (asus) puts in 5.2ghz and 1.390 but this is crazy for a pc that is always on basically
Crashed in seconds in P95. Opted for 54 PCORE, 40 ECORE, 45 Ring @ 1.123v. Ran p95 for 15-20 mins so I'm gonna go ahead and assume it's stable.
When I follow this step for step, I try to run cinnebench and it crashes. Even got a BSOD. Any work around?
Also, first ever time overlocking.
@@ahmadalhasan3936 Firstly congrats on your first overclock! First thing to do is to try for 5.4GHz.
I did exactly this in the video and windows couldn’t boot 3 times… not sure what’s going on
Did you manage to boot?
Did you find out what the issue was?
Im running MSI Z790-A Pro WiFi, but im unsure if the CPU Lite Load is messing with this when I try doing the same thing ive had issues. What did you use for CPU Lite Load for this? I also have the 13600kf tho if that makes any difference which I would think its not really any huge difference when it comes to voltages or am I wrong?
Well I just got mine and well I have good cooling and running default clock with xmp was only getting 70's, but I put it at 1.2 volts and put mine to test at 5.3 and it hit 90 as a max but it didn't stay there and the voltage was like stock it never stuck somewhere around 1.37 or something. Now this was each with the 10 min timers. If you let yours go 10 minutes what is your temps on the 5.5 you are running thank you..
ps. I'm using the cinebench r24 I just saw, and also when I pick no testing duration it seems it just keeps going? It doesn't stop at one minute and it doesn't show me a comparison of other cpus. I did get a test result on my 5.3 around 1900+ forgot exactly, but I know it was in the 1900's @ 5.3
I also noticed on this gigabyte board changing this core voltage to 1.2 doesn't stick, I read somewhere it's probably due to llc, but for us that the voltage isn't sticking what can we do to force it?
not everyone is so lucky.. my 13600KF crashes on Cinebench in less than 4 minutes with just a 100MHz overclock (5.2 P-cores) with locked 1.2V
heei nice dude but i dont understand this why are the clock speeds not running low on that software i have that same problem and i se by others that i runs lower is that a motherboard problem becouse i want to get that fixed it is possible>>???
These settings caused an unbalanced system for me unfortunatly. During a passmark test i got BSOD's due to high temps on the CPU. Lowering the ratio to 53 didn't cause any problems so far. I have a Be Quiet Dark Rock Pro 4 CPU-cooler and a few very good Be Quiet Silent Wings 4 case fans. Maybe water cooling is needed to get higher results.
I had a similar issue with my 9600k a few years ago, I replaced the DR4 Pro with NH-D15, no issues. Of course there may be an element of silicon lottery at play too, but if you can accommodate a 280mm AIO I'd try that next.
If it’s due to the high temps, then just lower your voltage more then, maybe that means you have a good chip but a bad cooler as it should go to such high temps at 1.20V
Tysm for this video mine is coming in the mail with a z790 board and I got the ddr5 ram already my scout cooler will be the ak620 and my case is nzxt h510 elite so I wanted to make sure everything runs great I’m excited to swap out this i7 9700 it’s bottlenecking my Rx 6800 in a bit of games actually. But rn playing the hell outta starfeild haha
Even I'm not ddr5 ? Can i do this ? I have msi pro z790-p wifi ddr4 my ram is 3200mhz
Because when i tried i only get 5087.56MHz