06:45 - Actually the business of 339 is equipped with the Recaro CL6710 while the A21N business is equipped with the Thompson Aero Vantage 33:30 - Actually the business of 339 is equipped with the Recaro CL6710 while the A21N business is equipped with the Thompson Aero Vantage I apologize for the mistake
Hi, Thankfully we flew through turbulence areas just twice: the first while climbing over New York area and then, ER, over northern Canada. In the second part of the flight in particular there was no significant weather. Coming to your question: In theory, yes, the smaller is an aircraft, the more it could be unsteady while crossing turbulence areas. But in this particular case, I mean the strong tailwind and the stormy areas over US and Canada, I don't think flying aboard an A380 or a B747 would have made any difference We would have experienced roughly about the same turbulence. Thanks for your comment. Greetings!
Hi! You're right. They're very similar but actually different. Aboard 339 the C seat is Recaro CL6710 while aboard A21N the seats are Thompson Aero Vantage. I'll preform a correction note in the description. Thank you for your help. Greetings
Hi, she didn't any mistake. Basicly you should be right: the difference between US and Portugal is normally 5 h. But not all year long. In fact in the US the daylight time is on since the second sunday of March while in EU we turn into daylight time just at the last week end of March. During those two weeks Portugal timezone is still WET (UTC + 0) while in NYC they already have EDT (UTC-4). Then Portugal is just 4 hours haead of NYC in this short timeframe. Thank you for your comment! Greetings from Italy
06:45 - Actually the business of 339 is equipped with the Recaro CL6710 while the A21N business is equipped with the Thompson Aero Vantage
33:30 - Actually the business of 339 is equipped with the Recaro CL6710 while the A21N business is equipped with the Thompson Aero Vantage
I apologize for the mistake
Did using the A321N rather than a wide body possibly a factor contributing to the insane turbulence during the whole journey?
Hi,
Thankfully we flew through turbulence areas just twice: the first while climbing over New York area and then, ER, over northern Canada. In the second part of the flight in particular there was no significant weather.
Coming to your question:
In theory, yes, the smaller is an aircraft, the more it could be unsteady while crossing turbulence areas.
But in this particular case, I mean the strong tailwind and the stormy areas over US and Canada, I don't think flying aboard an A380 or a B747 would have made any difference
We would have experienced roughly about the same turbulence.
Thanks for your comment.
Greetings!
Business class seats in A339 are different.
The ones in that A321LR are same like in TAPs older A332 (I think they have 2 ones left)
Hi!
You're right. They're very similar but actually different. Aboard 339 the C seat is Recaro CL6710 while aboard A21N the seats are Thompson Aero Vantage. I'll preform a correction note in the description.
Thank you for your help. Greetings
Flight attendant made a mistake, Portugal is 5 hours ahead of New York, or even the East coast of the USA, not 4 hours ahead lol.
Hi, she didn't any mistake. Basicly you should be right: the difference between US and Portugal is normally 5 h. But not all year long.
In fact in the US the daylight time is on since the second sunday of March while in EU we turn into daylight time just at the last week end of March.
During those two weeks Portugal timezone is still WET (UTC + 0) while in NYC they already have EDT (UTC-4). Then Portugal is just 4 hours haead of NYC in this short timeframe.
Thank you for your comment!
Greetings from Italy
@TheNextFlight right, that's true during daylight savings time. I forgot about that lol. Your welcome!
יפה
Thank you so much!
I'm glad you enjoyed.
Greetings
Wsg gng