Here in Brazil, if we know our family history history in 100 years, is already too much hahaha I only know till my great grandmother (cuz she was alive till last year)
The line I am from can only be definitively traced back to John Gater, born in about 1599 and baptized in England to no known parents, where he traveled to Virginia and had a son named John Gaither (spelling change that has stuck around ever since). My specific line almost ended when one ancestor only had one child and died at age 28 where my branch continues from. I might be mistaken, but I also think that ancestor was the only male child to have male children, meaning his father's line almost died with him.
If anyone's wondering how many unique names there even are, since every monarch seems to be a George, I counted: 1. William 2. Henry 3. Matilda 4. Stephen 5. Richard 6. John 7. Edward 8. Isabel 9. Elisabeth 10. Jane 11. Mary 12. James 13. Charles 14. Anne 15. Sophia 16. George 17. Victoria
asdf asdf apparantly she was extremely beautiful, but when she met him he tricked her by dressing up as a commoner and seeing if she'd still love him even though he wasn't royal (which was an english fairytale or some shit), but since she was german she didn't know the fairytale (because it was an english one, so she had never heard of it) and slapped him. which fucked up their relationship from the beginning. he also called her a horse, and i would imagine that saying that to someone would mess up your relationship. then, there was the fact that she didn't follow many english royal rules. because she was german. he only used her being ugly as an excuse because he couldnt get it up (: tl;dr (ew reddit): she was pretty, henry was just a cunt
Because all of the royal sons had no legit children at the time of William, he and Edward and all of their brothers got married really late in life. It was sort of a mad scramble. Before that, it was pretty straightforward that Princess Charlotte would have become Queen Charlotte, except she died in childbirth and took her baby with her. Her husband, Leopold of Saxe-Coburg, lost out on a chance to be King or Prince Consort of England due to her death, but wound up being elected King of the Belgians instead. Sort of a consolation prize. And Leopold's sister Victoria was Queen Victoria's mum.
Everyone coming here today after the queen's death, and saying this needs an update, obviously didn't watch the last 10 seconds of the video. I think CGP Grey was planning ahead ;)
@@impact0r obviously them too... all children who end up in terrible circumstances no matter what class or status. end of the day they're just children.
In my opinion the whole royal family thing seems hella toxic. I feel like it starts envy and greed betweem family members to decide who gets the crown. I dont like royalty.
Looking at the royal family tree laid out like this, it's really surprising how SHORT it is. You'd think that Wiliam the Conqueror was really ancient, but there were literally only 28 generations separating him from Queen Elizabeth II...
Well, a generation is average 25 years, and can be shorter. So it makes sense. But I get your point. The olden days aren't as old as we think they are.
Queen Anne did have a son but he died at the age of eleven. Most of her pregnancies ended in stillbirths. There was some type of medical problem that could easily be treated these days.
+wombatmike Bloody Mary had a shitloads of miscarriages/stillbirths too, in contrast to her virgin (maybe) sister. But that's less sad because she liked burning prods alive.
A dozen seasons? I wish! the White queen only had one season, the tudors 4, and the Crown 3. I love this type of shows wish there were more made to cover the whole monarchy. The sequels to the While Queen (The White princess and the Spanish Princess) were really good too.
rdpk I just finished watching The Tudors yesterday. I tried so hard throughout the entire series to understand because I've recently just became fixated with all of the England history, but I couldn't. I didn't understand what was happening to England with the wars, the fights between religion, Henry VIII making a new religion, etc. All I understood was the different wives since that's what made me want to watch it 🤦🏻♀️ Now I'm trying to actually understand the religion factor and I feel stupid because I could've watched this all along. 🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️
Well, no, because he wanted to annul his marriage. That is declare it invalid, and thus as if it didn't happen. This was actually fairly common; only 50 years earlier, Richard III declared his late brothers marriage invalid. Henry himself actually annulled all of his marriages besides Jane Seymour and Catherine Parr.
Annulment is actually a totally different thing from divorce, not just from a religious point of view, but legal as well. For example, divorcée can ask for divorce settlement, but an annulled one can’t, because there’s no marriage to begin with in the eye of law.
Don't you know marrying a devorsee is like commenting adultry. Once your married for he/she is a husband/wife for life. If he/she ask for divorce for he/she for ever she shall be unmarried and those who breaks the law is sinning
By the time Harry married Meghan, he was 5th in line (Elizabeth said gender no longer matters so Charlotte goes before Harry). Edward VIII was already crowned a king and the head of Anglican church. You are comparing apples to oranges.
Some uncles but yeah. I doubt he's watching. This is really brief and leaves out a lot of history. I would hope that his teachings were more in depth. Great lessons in leadership.
Henry VI was a weak king. Essentially like all politicians in today's world. All weak. This caused the war of the roses. As we see our own instability with weak leaders.
@Eli Wilson But it sounds silly to narrow it down to such a specific place. Why not call her" Queen of London", or" Queen of Hertfordshire"? Same with "Queen of England", it makes no sense to identify a specific place, rather than simply naming the country she is queen of, which is the United Kingdom. She is indeed queen of a bunch of non-UK places, but she is resident in the UK, hence "Queen of the United Kingdom" Everyone calls her "Queen of the United Kingdom," except Americans who opt for "Queen of England." It just sounds really bizarre and unnatural.
The Royal Family (beginning with Matilda) are related to the previous Anglo-Saxon monarchs (back to Alfred the Great) through Henry I’s wife who was Matilda of Scotland, she was a descendant of Aethelred the Unready’s granddaughter.
the monarchy the royal dynasty the saxe coburg and gothas are not democracy a big Tsunami is coming in the following years so much is being suppressed on online and social media , the British government censorship is Orwellian
What's not to understand? He explains (albeit briefly) what's going on when there's no succession by the eldest son. Wikipedia is your friend for the actual conflicts.
Great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great grand parents🤣🤣
@Ben Im not sure if it is due to my dads entire family coming from Normandy but I have seen many of my own lines that go directly from me to William the Conquerer even back as far as rollo
I am currently re-watching The Crown in anticipation of season 3, and I had this very same thought. That thought got me wondering how different the world would be had Edward been allowed to marry Wallis and remain king.
David Renton edward like other mens lives and him and wallis only stayed together because they became this famous couple, he was not worthy of the throne his brother cared more about duty.
Meh harry and his wife don’t matter they wont be king and queen so they queen let harry marry who ever. Kate middleton on the other hand seems like she was made in a lab to be the perfect queen. The day her and William become king and queen it will be glorious.
Samantha Christensen It’s thought, he didn’t abdicate just because he wanted to marry an American divorcee but also because he was a Nazi sympathiser, so the UK under his rule might have been on a very different side of history.
The truth about the first marriage of Queen Vicyoria to Lord John Elphinstone and mucj more jad been hidden for fsr yo long. I am Queen Victoria's Great Great Great Grand daughter via thay mattiage.
Edward was more complicated and many think that his rumored Nazi sympathies had as much to do with the establishment pressuring him to abdicate as his marriage. It's perfectly understandable for a king to also be a fascist, but to favor foreign fascists over the local crop is to much. Also Harry is down in the succession these days and keeping the rules about divorce would also bar his father.
@@maggiemae7749 Depends on how you look at it. Yes a lot of their ancestors were German but Edward was 6th Generation of his family born in Britain. After a certain point you need to admit the children of immigrants are British otherwise noone in England is legitimately British. Bunch of Johnny come latelies you should all go back where you came from and leave the island to the Welsh and Scots.
Mate try studying the War of the Roses where not ONLY does everyone have the same first name and surname, they're named after their titles too!!!! Have fun remembering which one of the 10203848 Earls of Lincoln, 2398 Somersets or fuckin 122372878946 De La Poles you're talkin about
@@eliegbert8121 Also because the Kings obvs came from the nobility and the nobility liked calling their children the same name because family purity n shit
A sombre update: Elizabeth 2 reigned 7 years longer than Queen Victoria making it over the 70 years finish line. A very impressive achievement! She left the crown to Charles 3, the oldest king to ascend to the throne. From there on, the crown will continue to William, the Prince of Wales, to his son George.
@@thebestchemicalelement4455 Actually, that's the UK, not Britain. I initially said England, because I was trying to differentiate between them and the Scottish monarchy. UK is the correct term because it includes Northern Ireland as well.
7:21 I hadn't noticed this despite watching this video three times, but that's undeniably a Minecraft creeper in the cart on the left of the left image, right?
@Hotsam Noirchards -- Yeah but you see, Hotsam...... you're wrong. And that is why the Electoral College is complicated. You wrote whoever gets the most votes becomes president. Not true. The winner is whomever gets a MAJORITY of electoral votes -- currently 270. However, you could have situations where 3 or more candidates get electoral votes -- with none of them achieving a majority (as has happened on a few occasions). Also, 2 candidates could tie, with each getting 269 electoral votes. (This has never happened.) In both cases, the election is thrown into the new House of Representatives who determine the new president through a vote of the 50 states voting as a bloc (each state getting 1 vote only). This has happened twice. So as you see, in extreme circumstances, it is not at all simple.
Funnlily enough- she's STILL about 4 years away from breaking the record set by Louis XIV for "longest reign over a major European country" and 14 away from the title of "Longest verified reign of any monarch in history" however she is longest reigning female ruler of any nation in history- a distinction previously held by Eleanor of Aquitaine for nearly 800 years who was also partly responsible for Henry the Younger's rebellion against Henry II
@@q345ify yeah but his "reign" started when he was 2 years old so he had a regent for the first 8 years and didn't actually start ruling until his minister died ten years after that, so you can kind of take 18 years off Louis XIV's reign.
I just want to say that Sophia of Hanover is an absolutely fascinating woman and i highly recommend reading her memoirs. the way she, the 13th child of a disgraced king married to the fourth brother with the smallest share of a puny kingdom got to the point where she was heiress to the english throne is absolutely riveting.
Well as a Brit' of Scot's stock; they really weren't all that relevant to this topic *until* the *1603 Union of the Crown's* , which was almost also the UK's birth date ... but the English Parliament said no. (by 1707 they'd come around to it; and the last Stuart monarch [ever] accomplished what James I had originally wanted)
@The Pasty British Guy From Wonderwoman In that case Henry would be a bigamist, since he married Anne Boleyn before the decree of annulment (or in your words, divorce) came through. If it was annulment then the marriage to Anne was valid. If it's divorce, then it's bigamy and invalid.
@The Pasty British Guy From Wonderwoman Hehehehehe ever heard of Louis and Eleanor of Aquitaine? Yea they also "annulled" their marriage in the same way over the same basis of consanguinity even though they both then subsequently married new spouses that are EVEN CLOSER RELATED to each other. Or even King John and his first wife, the heiress of I think the Duchy of Gloucester. You'd be surprised how many royal marriages that had been consummated wound up annulled (annulled, not divorced). Henry VIII despite popular belief was most certainly NOT the first English king to seek an annulment. What I'm trying to say is, "legally" in those ages is just a matter of price, not principle or even religious reasons. "Legally" = what whomever has the most amounts of money says it is. Whatever religious reasons is dragged out as an excuse is just that: an excuse. But make no mistake, Those annulments were handled as annulments, not divorce. That's why Henry's marriage to Anne is legitimised because in the eyes of the Anglican church, annulment = Henry and Katherine's marriage is a "blank sheet of paper", not that it happened and then it ended, but that it NEVER STARTED because it's invalid from the start. It's also the reason why Eleanor of Aquitaine got back her Duchy of Aquitaine on the annulment, instead of losing it as a divorced woman in those days most certainly would.
It wasn't the stress of WW II or the breakup of the empire that killed George VI, it was the fact he was a very heavy smoker and in later life suffered bad health with several smoking-related illnesses, including lung cancer and arteriosclerosis. It no doubt contributed to his other ailments too, just as it did to his daughter Princess Margaret, who died, aged 71, who suffered from a number of conditions that are strongly correlated with smoking and suffered bad health for much of her life. Meanwhile her sister has now surpassed here age by a quarter of a century (and apparently insisted her husband gave up smoking when they married - and he almost made it to 100). It's a lesson on why smoking is a bad idea, and one that will have been echoed in many families.
@@CorePathway Prince Philip lived to almost 100, Queen Elizabeth is 96 years old. I think the smoking is the major factor here, but there is some advantage in widening the gene pool.
Update: as of September 8 2022, Elizabeth II has died at 96, with the crown passing to the now-King Charles III. British people and other Commonwealth citizens reading this, we in America stand with you during this time of mourning ❤️
@@kekkewezel4615 also that the monarchy here serve a basically ceremonious role, and not an actual political one. For example, the monarch can choose anyone for prime minister, but will almost certainly pick the leader of the largest party.
Probably. But I will probably say the family as a whole since family tend to project their "image" to the offspring especially the parent. They have a certain expectation that come for the child, not meeting such expectation probably lead to them having little interest or disdained for the child. There is also different custom many family will have.
the video starts with the wrong line of kings since the english line died out in 1603, king james the scottish king takes over all crowns and invents the united kingdom and his line rules ever since. so he should start with the scottish line of kings which is also way older than the english line
If these are too many people involved with too many different names, do the last dynasty of Egypt. It's a miracle how Cleopatra VII ended up being actually really smart and charismatic, unless the official family tree is completely fake.
I mean it still doesn't. Until George passes and leaves the crown to someone else (and let's be real, the monarchy may be dead by then), the video is up to date.
Basically... William William Henry Stephen Henry Richard John, oi. Henry Ed Ed Ed Rich 2 Three more henrys, join our song Edward Edward Rich the 3rd Henry Henry Ed again Mary 1 Good Queen Liz Jimmy Charles And Charles, and then Jim Will/Mary Anne Gloria George George George George Will Victoria Edward George Edward George 6 And Queen Liz 2 completes the mix.
“The crown went to Queen Anne who also didn’t produce any heirs, though not from lack of effort.” Me: “HEYOOO!” “She was pregnant 17 times.” Me: “HEY... Oh, jeez.”
so thousands of english people have royal blood in their veins it's just that their grand grand grand grand grand grand grand grand grand grand.....grandpa was not crowned king NICE
I agree with you 100% I'm certain there are still tons of ancestors still alive today scattered about the World from way back to even the Egyptian Pharaohs time, which has nothing to do with the U.K. nor the history of the monarch. I told you they came from Sweden. 🐡🐠 Love from Michigan USA 💖 Peace ✌
@@l.lautsprecher3446 "European"is not a nationality, race or ethnicity. Germanic Europeans are from Caucasus and descendants of native Caucasians Waynakhs. South Europeans are from North Africa, India and Middle East. East Europeans are gypsies, Persians and Asians
If you REALLY want to annoy/impress, Horrible Histories did a delightful song to help remember the order and key details: ruclips.net/video/40qOAcz5bUM/видео.html
This video was so unrelevant for so long.. BUT, it was released EXACTLY 7 years ago! King Charles III has just entered the Buckingham Palace - September 9th, 2022. CGP Grey knew already the day and the year, releasing this video 7 years ago, honoring the Queen's 70 years reign. Impressive work, CGP Grey! (how did you know, if you can tell us)
My country doesn't have long history perse, but it has multiple small kingdoms(like 40s of them) that very matter to our history so the history books still thick as hecm
Fun fact: if Victoria had no sons or if all of them died, the line would have merged with the Hohenzollerns, making Kaiser Wilhelm II the British monarch. If we used the modern rules from Victoria onwards, Willy really would have been the King, since his mother was Victoria’s eldest child. Somewhat interestingly, this would mean that the British would have a 100% legitimate claim to France as well, since Wilhelm was an indirect descendant of Napoleon.
omggg94 yes it does... I'm a science student... Yet I'm here you know why because of my new found love for history from that bloody game of thrones 😂😂😂
Yes and although Game of Thrones borrows from a lot of countries’ history, the main premise is the English Wars of the Roses (“wars” because it was a series of wars to claim the throne). It was epic, violent and very, very complicated but also thrilling to learn about. You couldn’t make it up.
David Renton Yes I know it is. But George Martin himself has said in interviews that he was mainly influenced by the English Wars of the Roses - which was a real life series of brutal wars for the crown that went on for years between the houses of Lancaster and York. Nobody could deny the ressemblance with Lannister and Stark? Look up the Wars of the Roses and you will see for yourself that the parallels are unmistakable.
Wait a sec, in between George II and George III there's "Frederick"... you didn't expound on that, who is he? (I'm too busy to look it up I have to research Burundi and Cambodia right now, I'll just come back here when someone can elaborate for me.)
+Geography Now With Primogeniture the crown will pass to the son of the current King, who, if is dead, ie Frederick will pass to any legitimate children he has. Fredrick died before his father did, but left a son, who then became King upon the death of his grand father.
Image 13137 Elizabeth was illegitimate in the eyes of the Catholic Church. Half of England was Catholic and half was Protestant and it sparked wars across Britain. The Catholic half wanted Mary Queen of Scots on the throne because she was Catholic and a legitimate heir, as did the Vatican, Spain, France. BUT she was Scottish and French and that didn't sit well with the law which described that the English monarch should be English. No one wanted Elizabeth, but then Scotland became Protestant and Mary of Scots had made some terrible marriage decisions which lost her the confidence of her own people. Mary Queen of Scots had a son who grew up Protestant, and Elizabeth said that James VI of Scotland would become king IF he consented to the execution of his mother Mary. It's a seriously complicated rivalry and it'd take you months to learn it all but that's the scope of it, religious wars and Elizabeth being viewed by half her country as "the wrong queen"
tacos mexicanstyle I just finished the TV series "Reign". Reading your comment was just like having a recap of the series. I fell in love with Mary. (Well, the personality of Mary in the TV series). Long live Queen Mary of Scots! Long may she reign! 😅😅😅
Remember kids, if you are in line to the throne and your sibling asks you to join them on a hunting trip, just say no.
I see what you did there . I like the game of thrones reference 😏
@@PattBatmann *cough cough* 0:46
Ye
As a younger sibling I can confirm hunting trips are very beneficial for -me- the family
@@PattBatmann ...did you not watch the video
i cant imagine how cool would it be to know your family history stretching back almost 1000 years
Yes! We know about 450 yrs!
Well, one might say everyone's family history goes back to the first human creatures on earth in history 🤔🤷♂️😂
Here in Brazil, if we know our family history history in 100 years, is already too much hahaha I only know till my great grandmother (cuz she was alive till last year)
Yeah but they also have to live with the fact that their relatives were marrying and beheading each other
The line I am from can only be definitively traced back to John Gater, born in about 1599 and baptized in England to no known parents, where he traveled to Virginia and had a son named John Gaither (spelling change that has stuck around ever since).
My specific line almost ended when one ancestor only had one child and died at age 28 where my branch continues from. I might be mistaken, but I also think that ancestor was the only male child to have male children, meaning his father's line almost died with him.
"Not every child matters"
-CGP Grey, 2015
Triskilion Is that you, mom?
Triskilion
“No child left behind” my a**
That's what my dad said to all of his kids exept me and my half brother
ouch
kitty cat? _Natural selection_
I love how there’s a total of like 10 different names over the course of 1000 years
English history is a messy tangle of Henrys, Edwards, Georges, Williams, Richards, Jameses and Charleses.
Even worse in France. King has a male heir? Louis it is.
“James James James James James *Mary Queen of Scots* James”
Wj
I heard Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Eggs, Bacon, and Spam.
I thought that it was a song 😂
And back to the sixteen hundreds.
a youtuber with quality content p
"because not every child matters"
The middle child: Just smile and wave boys, smile and wave
I’m a middle child....
@@BabySonicGT congrats
@@aviz8590 k
@@BabySonicGT Uncongrats
I’m the middle child in 5
I love how a "brief" history of the British Monarchy is one of your longest ever videos.
+WonderWhy Love you channel keep making videos!!!!!!!!!!
true story...
The best part is this is just the monarchy in the past millennium, there was even MORE mess before 1066
OMG I love your videos! Please keep making them they're so addicting!!!!!
+PaulusSupreme I doubt he'll stop anytime soon, he gets $15,500 for each video.....
If anyone's wondering how many unique names there even are, since every monarch seems to be a George, I counted:
1. William
2. Henry
3. Matilda
4. Stephen
5. Richard
6. John
7. Edward
8. Isabel
9. Elisabeth
10. Jane
11. Mary
12. James
13. Charles
14. Anne
15. Sophia
16. George
17. Victoria
Now do Scotland:
1. James
There's like, 8 Charles the 2nds, 10 Edward V and George IIIs and like, 5 Marys
Henry VIII: “Splitter of churches...
And ladies”
This is my new nickname for him.
I paused the video just to look whether someone else noticed it 🤣
I mean...
He did split me and my cousin
HOI4Player1000
Do you know the full story on that? Because I know I do.
@HOI4Player1000 in his defense, she was.
asdf asdf
apparantly she was extremely beautiful, but when she met him he tricked her by dressing up as a commoner and seeing if she'd still love him even though he wasn't royal (which was an english fairytale or some shit), but since she was german she didn't know the fairytale (because it was an english one, so she had never heard of it) and slapped him. which fucked up their relationship from the beginning. he also called her a horse, and i would imagine that saying that to someone would mess up your relationship. then, there was the fact that she didn't follow many english royal rules. because she was german.
he only used her being ugly as an excuse because he couldnt get it up (:
tl;dr (ew reddit): she was pretty, henry was just a cunt
James James James James James James James James James James James James James James ...
OMG it's comrade SovietWomble!!
You forgot to put "Mary Queen of Scots" in the middle of that.
George, George, George, George, Will, Victoria
Because all of the royal sons had no legit children at the time of William, he and Edward and all of their brothers got married really late in life. It was sort of a mad scramble.
Before that, it was pretty straightforward that Princess Charlotte would have become Queen Charlotte, except she died in childbirth and took her baby with her. Her husband, Leopold of Saxe-Coburg, lost out on a chance to be King or Prince Consort of England due to her death, but wound up being elected King of the Belgians instead. Sort of a consolation prize. And Leopold's sister Victoria was Queen Victoria's mum.
Holy shit it's womble
"Hunting accident". Aye, a classic.
Lmao GOT s1
@@rankz5293 LOL
Underrated comment •`~'•
Literally an assassination method in CK3
There goes my 4/3/4 heir
Everyone coming here today after the queen's death, and saying this needs an update, obviously didn't watch the last 10 seconds of the video. I think CGP Grey was planning ahead ;)
Yeah, he's got it covered. Maybe a footnote at most, but honestly everyone knows about the Queen by now so they can figure it out
Wait wdf what!?
Is this the reason why I am getting this is recomdation for last whole week?
Hold up wait a minute
He does say Charles is the longest heir apparent so maybe it does need a update
@@algaesachel8551 Nope, don’t care
Prince Charles: Mum can i rule now
Queen Elizabeth: no
shall we resort to the torcher chamber sire?
Nah, straight to the gallows, mate. She's done
IF QUEEN ELIZABETH II DIED HER CROWN WILL GO TO HER SON CHARLES, NOW THE THIRD
@@vcloudyoutube7853 not if he dies first lmao
@@LucasSantos-ss6ou He actually has coronavirus - apparently it's quite mild, but who knows, he might not become king!
I’d love to see a “brief” history of the Japanese imperial family, one of the longest continuous royal lines in the world
China:
@@Vysair Chinese warlords: I like China so much I prefer to see 25 of them
@Pranay Talati Please explain :)
@Pranay Talati Wow! Complicated! And... incestuous!
Didn't ask
I feel so bad for the children who were supposed to inherit the crown but "went mysteriously missing"
Or the people that were supposed to inherit the crown but then someone had a child putting them further back.
How about the children who were not supposed to inherit the crown and "went mysteriously missing" but were commoners so none cared?
@@impact0r obviously them too... all children who end up in terrible circumstances no matter what class or status. end of the day they're just children.
@@impact0r THATS sad-
In my opinion the whole royal family thing seems hella toxic. I feel like it starts envy and greed betweem family members to decide who gets the crown. I dont like royalty.
Looking at the royal family tree laid out like this, it's really surprising how SHORT it is.
You'd think that Wiliam the Conqueror was really ancient, but there were literally only 28 generations separating him from Queen Elizabeth II...
Well, a generation is average 25 years, and can be shorter. So it makes sense. But I get your point. The olden days aren't as old as we think they are.
Yeah ONLY 28 generations 😂
You can help save 26 million of North Korea people by watch yeonmi park
@@mansionbookerstudios9629 nobody cares
time is a weird thing, for example humans only life 3,692 weeks on average
the saddest thing I've ever heard:
"Queen Anne, who also didn't produce any heirs...she was pregnant 17 times"
that's heartbreaking
+wombatmike She was the Susan Lucci of royal births.
Queen Anne did have a son but he died at the age of eleven. Most of her pregnancies ended in stillbirths. There was some type of medical problem that could easily be treated these days.
+wombatmike And here all I can think of is Stannis's wife Selyse, from the books A Song of Ice and Fire.
+wombatmike Bloody Mary had a shitloads of miscarriages/stillbirths too, in contrast to her virgin (maybe) sister. But that's less sad because she liked burning prods alive.
+mankytoes False. Bloody Mary had only a false pregnancy, no miscarriages or stillbirths
No, this is incorrect. Queen Elizabeth II will outlive every human in history and reign until the heat death of the universe
as if she wouldn't continue to rule the nothingness of nothing
_Why stop there?_
Nah, she has been around since the dawn of time.
Sid Meier's Civilization is truly prophetic
Fennekin Silver wrong.
She will revert to her primal state and rule a new universe.
Duh.
This was a lot faster than watching a dozen seasons of The White Queen, The Tudors and The Crown.
"The Crown" is actually really good. If im thinking of the same show.
@@benjaminnewlon7865 You mean the Netflix series? Some glaring historical licenses aside, I agree.
Don't forget reign
A dozen seasons? I wish! the White queen only had one season, the tudors 4, and the Crown 3. I love this type of shows wish there were more made to cover the whole monarchy. The sequels to the While Queen (The White princess and the Spanish Princess) were really good too.
rdpk I just finished watching The Tudors yesterday. I tried so hard throughout the entire series to understand because I've recently just became fixated with all of the England history, but I couldn't. I didn't understand what was happening to England with the wars, the fights between religion, Henry VIII making a new religion, etc. All I understood was the different wives since that's what made me want to watch it 🤦🏻♀️ Now I'm trying to actually understand the religion factor and I feel stupid because I could've watched this all along. 🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️
"Never fear: The rules are here."
One of the quotes to remember.
You can help save 26 million of North Korea people by watch yeonmi park
7:45 So marrying a divorcee is not ok, for the head of a church that was founded because a king wanted to divorce his wife?
Well, no, because he wanted to annul his marriage. That is declare it invalid, and thus as if it didn't happen. This was actually fairly common; only 50 years earlier, Richard III declared his late brothers marriage invalid. Henry himself actually annulled all of his marriages besides Jane Seymour and Catherine Parr.
Nirtrous Ha!
@@alexander9703 potAYto, potAHto!
Annulment is actually a totally different thing from divorce, not just from a religious point of view, but legal as well. For example, divorcée can ask for divorce settlement, but an annulled one can’t, because there’s no marriage to begin with in the eye of law.
Don't you know marrying a devorsee is like commenting adultry. Once your married for he/she is a husband/wife for life. If he/she ask for divorce for he/she for ever she shall be unmarried and those who breaks the law is sinning
All these “hunting mistakes” and the “unknown disappearance” got me dead 💀😂
Yeah them too..
@@dominicgent3465 what do you mean
@@dominicgent3465 I was gonna say that
@@5.3cheyito Takes a moment to sink in.
Hmmm was it "mistake" or a case of the stabby stabby
You know how complicated the royal family is, when you start half way through the tree and still end up with 9 minutes of names
I mean we went up a millennia of inheritance of a really powerful family. If you go down your family rabbit hole you'll have a long list too 😂
@@thelazyrabbit4220 I tried everything but i have no clue further then 1836
Try France. From around 300 to 1848. Pretty complicated !
@@hugolouessard3914 except the capetians, who were just a long line of father to son inheritances XD
@@thelazyrabbit4220 Hello dear👋👋,how are you doing today?I hope everything is fine with you?
3:48 isn’t it funny how the family tree at this point resembles the shape of Great Britain…
OMG Ur right
I commented this years ago- but like yea
“Not every child matters”
Schools: Write that down
Sheesh pretty chilly pfp you got there
@@thefmdguy1308 What are you talking about? That's just a regular normal person.
@@Mr.Bimgus its a dog now
@@thefmdguy1308 what was it before it is dog now
667th like, sorry!
1936: You can’t marry a divorced American commoner.
Prince Harry: How bout I do ANYWAYY
By the time Harry married Meghan, he was 5th in line (Elizabeth said gender no longer matters so Charlotte goes before Harry). Edward VIII was already crowned a king and the head of Anglican church. You are comparing apples to oranges.
@@lindasek1206 It's a joke buddy
*har har har*
r/unexpectedbillwurtz
lol and look how it turned out for him, ;P american devorced commoners are not suposed to marry british royalty. It just isn't meant to be at all
Prince George is watching this like “damn I’m related to all these people”
Exept for cromwell.
I hope Prince George will read this comment.
@@anthonybenci9035 and crommys son
Some uncles but yeah. I doubt he's watching. This is really brief and leaves out a lot of history. I would hope that his teachings were more in depth. Great lessons in leadership.
Henry VI was a weak king. Essentially like all politicians in today's world. All weak. This caused the war of the roses. As we see our own instability with weak leaders.
8:25 Longest Heir apparent is no more! Though at age 73, who knows how long his reign will last
15-30 years
*"Not every child matters"*
parents: secretly agreeing
loooool
Lmao
I knew it. Mom lied!!
The quiet kid at school typed this
@@gavin3915 HHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
It’s crazy how if even one of these particular events didn’t occur that the Queen of England right now would be someone else
its supposed to be someone else
@@dreascornelias7021 that's what every usurper says.
@@dreascornelias7021 Like who?
why do americans say "queen of england"?
she's "queen of the united kingdom"
@Eli Wilson But it sounds silly to narrow it down to such a specific place. Why not call her" Queen of London", or" Queen of Hertfordshire"? Same with "Queen of England", it makes no sense to identify a specific place, rather than simply naming the country she is queen of, which is the United Kingdom. She is indeed queen of a bunch of non-UK places, but she is resident in the UK, hence "Queen of the United Kingdom"
Everyone calls her "Queen of the United Kingdom," except Americans who opt for "Queen of England." It just sounds really bizarre and unnatural.
"Not Every Child Matters." -Every Parent that has 3 or more Children
edgy
*at least
Yeah being the middle child I can relate
Rly
Miles Weckerle yeah can relate. It is liberating tho, since no one gives a sht about what you do
The Royal Family (beginning with Matilda) are related to the previous Anglo-Saxon monarchs (back to Alfred the Great) through Henry I’s wife who was Matilda of Scotland, she was a descendant of Aethelred the Unready’s granddaughter.
“Not every child matters , so William had three kids we care about” LOL 😂
Very relatable 😂😂😂
the monarchy the royal dynasty the saxe coburg and gothas are not democracy a big Tsunami is coming in the following years so much is being suppressed on online and social media , the British government censorship is Orwellian
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Infinite Man why
😂😂
the royals: keeping it in the family since 1066
... U single? ..... Every king seed hes queen
What about Cromwell
Thanks inbred demons
Inbred demons
@@hughjass2075 after Cromwell Charles I's child (Charles II) took over, so it is still in the family
i'm gonna pretend like i understood all of this
I've watched this video multiple times and I still don't understand it.
Irene Parkin I half understand it, it gets simpler as you go along
abdul haseeb you’re not alone
What's not to understand? He explains (albeit briefly) what's going on when there's no succession by the eldest son. Wikipedia is your friend for the actual conflicts.
It's not that hard to understand
This was such an entertaining and informative video! I really appreciate the humour you added to the brief history of the Royal Family. Great job!
It was made 7 years ago.
@@kurwanko I'm currently working on an AI that generates comments for videos. That comment was one of the generated comments.
@@samyosm why
@@kurwanko Cause it's fun.
Imagine knowing your family tree goes all the way back to 1066 and knowing the people and their names who came before you
And their history and what they did and (maybe) their personality traits? That's sooooo cool
Great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great grand parents🤣🤣
That would be cool to know all your grandparents till like almost a 1000 years ago
@Ben well that’s awkward
@Ben Im not sure if it is due to my dads entire family coming from Normandy but I have seen many of my own lines that go directly from me to William the Conquerer even back as far as rollo
Prince Harry *marries an American commoner and a divorcee*
Princess Margaret : wait..
King Edward VIII : _WAITTTT!_
I am currently re-watching The Crown in anticipation of season 3, and I had this very same thought. That thought got me wondering how different the world would be had Edward been allowed to marry Wallis and remain king.
Probably that means UK will either be neutral or help the fascists in the UK for example Oswald Mosley or maybe join the axis powers to fight USSR
David Renton edward like other mens lives and him and wallis only stayed together because they became this famous couple, he was not worthy of the throne his brother cared more about duty.
Meh harry and his wife don’t matter they wont be king and queen so they queen let harry marry who ever. Kate middleton on the other hand seems like she was made in a lab to be the perfect queen. The day her and William become king and queen it will be glorious.
Samantha Christensen It’s thought, he didn’t abdicate just because he wanted to marry an American divorcee but also because he was a Nazi sympathiser, so the UK under his rule might have been on a very different side of history.
Nobody:
Heirs in the royal family: the death of my siblings was just an a c c i d e n t
FiveGreenBottles 6 6 6 Heir dies.
Ruina Imperri. Woopsies! Was that me that just killed my siblings children? Aww what a silly mistake. Guess i have to be the king now...
@@ruinnaimperii4686 Oops, my game crashed
Oops my 6/6/6 heir died, thank that the game totally "crashed"
No forensics back then
Time for my yearly watch of every CGP Grey video
Prince Harry:*Marries a Divorcee American Commoner, gets away with it*
Ghost of Edward VIII: am i a joke to you
The truth about the first marriage of Queen Vicyoria to Lord John Elphinstone and mucj more jad been hidden for fsr yo long. I am
Queen Victoria's Great Great Great Grand daughter via thay mattiage.
Edward was more complicated and many think that his rumored Nazi sympathies had as much to do with the establishment pressuring him to abdicate as his marriage. It's perfectly understandable for a king to also be a fascist, but to favor foreign fascists over the local crop is to much. Also Harry is down in the succession these days and keeping the rules about divorce would also bar his father.
@@FakeSchrodingersCat that family is German
@@maggiemae7749 Depends on how you look at it. Yes a lot of their ancestors were German but Edward was 6th Generation of his family born in Britain. After a certain point you need to admit the children of immigrants are British otherwise noone in England is legitimately British. Bunch of Johnny come latelies you should all go back where you came from and leave the island to the Welsh and Scots.
I bet Princess Margaret was also spinning in her grave when Harry married Meghan.
"Not every child matters"... Man that hit a little too close to home.
FadeToBlack888 shut the fuck up you fucking jizz fountain.
Tshiamo Segalo _jizz fountain omg_
Tim Evans definitely some extremely necessary information for us. Much thanks
Usually it's the girls who don't matter.
millieo no. Sisters get the most attention. The youngest ones get no love at all. From my experience atleast
how many names were there back then?? there was like 174828 james and 194728 charles and yeah
Mate try studying the War of the Roses where not ONLY does everyone have the same first name and surname, they're named after their titles too!!!! Have fun remembering which one of the 10203848 Earls of Lincoln, 2398 Somersets or fuckin 122372878946 De La Poles you're talkin about
Those were just traditional names, the didn't want a Nehemiah ruling.
@@eliegbert8121 Also because the Kings obvs came from the nobility and the nobility liked calling their children the same name because family purity n shit
lanna d and 125226 henrys
Henry and Edward are the highest on a tie, with 8 each
And thus, this video gains sudden relevance
Ayup.
You can help save 26 million of North Korea people by watch yeonmi park
Ironic that marrying a divorcee is so taboo for the royals yet the Anglican Church was started based on divorce
Wait and see what happens in fifteen years.
@@gabesegun7966 wdym
@@wandefter Prince Charles's Wife, Camilla, is a divorcee, and there was a massive scandal surrounding their affair and Princess Diana
I mean, there is a difference between annulment and divorce. Henry claimed that his marriage with Catherine was invalid.
Back then it was all about the male, it didn't matter if Henry the 8th was divorced it only mattered if the person he was marrying was divorced.
“ not every child matters”
Truer words never been spoken before
@@mr.p215 OOF
You can help save 25 million of North Korea people by watch yeonmi park
*never fear: the rules are here*
He lost america and his mind
I'm the 666th like :)
Hasinaz Ahmad Every Students NightMare
Yeah I still feel even though King John the 1st abused his power he got a raw deal with that Magna Carta ❣🙄
A sombre update:
Elizabeth 2 reigned 7 years longer than Queen Victoria making it over the 70 years finish line. A very impressive achievement!
She left the crown to Charles 3, the oldest king to ascend to the throne. From there on, the crown will continue to William, the Prince of Wales, to his son George.
Tysm ☆
Except for the precise number of "7 years longer than Queen Victoria" you didn't really update much
@@9nikola I edited it
You can help save 26 million of North Korea people by watch yeonmi
You can help save 25 million of North Korea people by watch yeonmi
Britain: James, James, James, James, James, Mary queen of Scots, James
France: Louis Louis Louis Louis Louis Louis Philip Louie
kian croxall Scotland not England
Scotland had all those James, but England did have:
George, George, George, George, Victoria, Edward, George, Edward, George, Elizabeth
@@thebestchemicalelement4455 Actually, that's the UK, not Britain. I initially said England, because I was trying to differentiate between them and the Scottish monarchy. UK is the correct term because it includes Northern Ireland as well.
@@thebestchemicalelement4455 Er du dansk?
All Charles. There a good amount of Charles in France
I can't understand this messy family chart, imagine the little prince George will have to study and remember everything about his messy family chart.
Its confusing at first glance but doesnt take much time to learn
In the UK they probably teach them when they're kids.
well everyone in the uk has royalty in their blood
This is easy to understand, what are you talking about?
@@AustGM we do cut out the non relevant people from the line though to make it easier to study.
England: "hunting accident"
Russia: "vacation in Siberia during the Winter"
I was under the impression that hunting is the only reason to have a Siberia vacation in the winter.
Ottoman : time and place doesn't matter
@@ibrahimkalmati9379 Ottomans were more like fastest to the capital wins
@@syedferoz2188 yeah
7:21 I hadn't noticed this despite watching this video three times, but that's undeniably a Minecraft creeper in the cart on the left of the left image, right?
Oh my
This isn’t the only one. Keep watching older Grey videos to find more.
It's easier to understand how the Electoral College works when a presidential tie is made than the Royal Family's history.
ok
Well, it actually is because the guidelines are clearer, and the Constitution is very hard to amend.
You know something is wrong when it is easier to understand american election laws than the original subject.
@Hotsam Noirchards -- Yeah but you see, Hotsam...... you're wrong. And that is why the Electoral College is complicated. You wrote whoever gets the most votes becomes president. Not true. The winner is whomever gets a MAJORITY of electoral votes -- currently 270. However, you could have situations where 3 or more candidates get electoral votes -- with none of them achieving a majority (as has happened on a few occasions). Also, 2 candidates could tie, with each getting 269 electoral votes. (This has never happened.) In both cases, the election is thrown into the new House of Representatives who determine the new president through a vote of the 50 states voting as a bloc (each state getting 1 vote only). This has happened twice.
So as you see, in extreme circumstances, it is not at all simple.
@@markmh835 he said clear, not simple 🤷♂️
James
James
James
James
*MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS*
James
4:53
@@Mimi-by3gz *IF SHE BREATHES*
*SHE'S A THOOOOOOT*
@@sspark2686 OI dunny dare tae diss oor queen we never even had! Fuck sake man! (don't take this seriously tho)
@@thanospetebtw8352 Mmmmm... ok
Maki momota Oi que putas diceais?
I remember back in 2010 I was like how is Queen Elizabeth still Queen? And 10 years later she still is queen.
Funnlily enough- she's STILL about 4 years away from breaking the record set by Louis XIV for "longest reign over a major European country" and 14 away from the title of "Longest verified reign of any monarch in history" however she is longest reigning female ruler of any nation in history- a distinction previously held by Eleanor of Aquitaine for nearly 800 years who was also partly responsible for Henry the Younger's rebellion against Henry II
@@q345ify yeah but his "reign" started when he was 2 years old so he had a regent for the first 8 years and didn't actually start ruling until his minister died ten years after that, so you can kind of take 18 years off Louis XIV's reign.
Her husband is nearly 100
Still is 6 months later*
@@coconut_1219 Her mother lived till 101.
Came back to watch this again today, for obvious reasons.
"How many James can we put in the Throne?"
Answer: Yes.
That's nothing compared to the French Louis and Spanish Alfonsos.
@@micahphilson ikr
@@idkwhy_0779 There are 19 Louis but if you added the mervonigian king its 23 Louis because Louis came from Clovis
Clovis>Lovis>Louis
What about German Henrys
**France slowly walking out the room with Their kings Named Louis**
7:20
So are we not going to talk about the creeper in the wagon?
Miguel Barrios-Sánchez I guess not ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Miguel Barrios-Sánchez aw man
Wow your eyes are sharp
Hahaha how did you spot That
U a legend
I saw it too
I just want to say that Sophia of Hanover is an absolutely fascinating woman and i highly recommend reading her memoirs. the way she, the 13th child of a disgraced king married to the fourth brother with the smallest share of a puny kingdom got to the point where she was heiress to the english throne is absolutely riveting.
Thank you Mr. Grey, It's moments like this when I really appreciate you.
“Now this is the point where we acknowledge: Scotland Exists”
Damn Grey your playing with fire there
Well as a Brit' of Scot's stock; they really weren't all that relevant to this topic *until* the *1603 Union of the Crown's* , which was almost also the UK's birth date ... but the English Parliament said no.
(by 1707 they'd come around to it; and the last Stuart monarch [ever] accomplished what James I had originally wanted)
*Church:* Kings can't divorce.
*Henry VIII:* I'm about finish this mans whole career
merve. Annulment, not divorce. *YES* , there is a difference.
Hence splitting of church’s and women
@The Pasty British Guy From Wonderwoman In that case Henry would be a bigamist, since he married Anne Boleyn before the decree of annulment (or in your words, divorce) came through. If it was annulment then the marriage to Anne was valid. If it's divorce, then it's bigamy and invalid.
@The Pasty British Guy From Wonderwoman Hehehehehe ever heard of Louis and Eleanor of Aquitaine? Yea they also "annulled" their marriage in the same way over the same basis of consanguinity even though they both then subsequently married new spouses that are EVEN CLOSER RELATED to each other. Or even King John and his first wife, the heiress of I think the Duchy of Gloucester. You'd be surprised how many royal marriages that had been consummated wound up annulled (annulled, not divorced). Henry VIII despite popular belief was most certainly NOT the first English king to seek an annulment.
What I'm trying to say is, "legally" in those ages is just a matter of price, not principle or even religious reasons. "Legally" = what whomever has the most amounts of money says it is. Whatever religious reasons is dragged out as an excuse is just that: an excuse.
But make no mistake, Those annulments were handled as annulments, not divorce. That's why Henry's marriage to Anne is legitimised because in the eyes of the Anglican church, annulment = Henry and Katherine's marriage is a "blank sheet of paper", not that it happened and then it ended, but that it NEVER STARTED because it's invalid from the start. It's also the reason why Eleanor of Aquitaine got back her Duchy of Aquitaine on the annulment, instead of losing it as a divorced woman in those days most certainly would.
Aaaaactually: I'm about to finish my wife's whole career
“He was dead at the time”
So... he wasn’t dead later?
I think you're up to something 🤔
Timestamp?
@@xexpaguette 3:14
🤔🤔🤔🤔
😳
These videos are timeless. I could argue this video is high quality then some videos made now
Teacher: Don't worry, the test isn't that confusing
*The Test:*
For the poor people of GB, literally a test
It wasn't the stress of WW II or the breakup of the empire that killed George VI, it was the fact he was a very heavy smoker and in later life suffered bad health with several smoking-related illnesses, including lung cancer and arteriosclerosis. It no doubt contributed to his other ailments too, just as it did to his daughter Princess Margaret, who died, aged 71, who suffered from a number of conditions that are strongly correlated with smoking and suffered bad health for much of her life. Meanwhile her sister has now surpassed here age by a quarter of a century (and apparently insisted her husband gave up smoking when they married - and he almost made it to 100).
It's a lesson on why smoking is a bad idea, and one that will have been echoed in many families.
well, i dont support smoking at all, but smokers do smoke more the more anxious or nervous they are, and the WWII probably got him pretty nervous
So is inbreeding. Not all royals got that message, but Harry certainly did!
@@CorePathway Prince Philip lived to almost 100, Queen Elizabeth is 96 years old. I think the smoking is the major factor here, but there is some advantage in widening the gene pool.
may she rest in heaven to meet reagan again
@@CorePathway I mean William married a commoner as well.
The only family tree which can out Alabama Alabama.
Roll tide ⚪️🔴⚪️🔴⚪️🔴⚪️🔴
Habsburgs: Am I a joke to you?
Which is no one
No one:
The Hapsburg: You wanna see my family reef?
Japan also has a bit of it
Update: as of September 8 2022, Elizabeth II has died at 96, with the crown passing to the now-King Charles III.
British people and other Commonwealth citizens reading this, we in America stand with you during this time of mourning ❤️
no we don't abolish all monarchies
@@dakotastevens8 of course you yanks don't know the meaning of tradition and history
@@kekkewezel4615 also that the monarchy here serve a basically ceremonious role, and not an actual political one.
For example, the monarch can choose anyone for prime minister, but will almost certainly pick the leader of the largest party.
No we don't
@@dakotastevens8 This outline illustrates that these people wernt fit to rule anyone. They dont care about the well being but anyone but themselves.
"not every child matters" ouch😂😂😂😂😂
The truth hurts sometimes 🤣
cypher12 kim Yeah pretty much. 😕
Depend on the family.
Blugale Doh I'd say it depends on the child..
Probably. But I will probably say the family as a whole since family tend to project their "image" to the offspring especially the parent. They have a certain expectation that come for the child, not meeting such expectation probably lead to them having little interest or disdained for the child. There is also different custom many family will have.
...that his father's rules were dumb and his sisters were dumb-
@Yolanda72 I think you mean sterile not impotent
@Yolanda72 No Henry probably wasn't sterile he had a lot of illegitimate children.
"Scotland exists." -CGP Grey, 2015
It might be weird... but apparently I accidentally spell "Scotland" as "SCONEland"
...yeah, I think I'm hungry ._.
Wait, what???!!!
*mind blown*
Sadly (i can say that cos im scottish)
R.I.P. Demoman
the video starts with the wrong line of kings since the english line died out in 1603, king james the scottish king takes over all crowns and invents the united kingdom and his line rules ever since.
so he should start with the scottish line of kings which is also way older than the english line
Fun fact: in order to be an ancestor or to know when your ancestors were alive is 11 generations ago! (276 years)
"Richard then disappeared under mysterious circumstances..."
*_This enraged Richard severely, leading him to become Richard III_*
eff the gryffindors Oversimplified! Ayyye
What!?
Uday moment
1:50
"Two there should be. No more, no less. A master to embody the power, and an appreciate to crave it."
-Henry II/Darth Bane
Anyone who gets this reference is awesome.
Lt. Daniel Huffman Star Wars. The Rule of Two for the Sith that started with Darth Bane and ended with the Emperor and Darth Vader.
appreciate ? You mean apprentice right ?
Manguch Beg He means appreciate.
Do this for the Habsburgs I dare you
Scoob The Boob
Useful Charts already did it. Look for it on his channel.
Yes!! Me too
YEAH
If these are too many people involved with too many different names, do the last dynasty of Egypt. It's a miracle how Cleopatra VII ended up being actually really smart and charismatic, unless the official family tree is completely fake.
Not all children matter
The fact that this video didn't need changing until just mere hours ago is insane
I mean it still doesn't. Until George passes and leaves the crown to someone else (and let's be real, the monarchy may be dead by then), the video is up to date.
Basically...
William
William
Henry
Stephen
Henry
Richard
John, oi.
Henry
Ed
Ed
Ed
Rich 2
Three more henrys, join our song
Edward
Edward
Rich the 3rd
Henry
Henry
Ed again
Mary 1
Good Queen Liz
Jimmy
Charles
And Charles, and then
Jim
Will/Mary
Anne Gloria
George
George
George
George
Will
Victoria
Edward
George
Edward
George 6
And Queen Liz 2 completes the mix.
Ahh a horrible histories fan hmmmm.
That's all the English King's and Queens since William 1st that there have been.
lol nice
YES!
Aahhh my childhood
That's all the English kings and queens since William 1st there have ever been
7:20 anybody notice the creeper in the carriage 😂
I Was looking for this comment😂😂😂😂
Yeas ofc I did
So minecraft was in the British to sorry
@@twanvanderheijden3463 me two
No, that creeper is real, I can confirm I was there
“The crown went to Queen Anne who also didn’t produce any heirs, though not from lack of effort.”
Me: “HEYOOO!”
“She was pregnant 17 times.”
Me: “HEY... Oh, jeez.”
One survived until 11 years old. Medical practices were not as up to date as they are today.
Yeah. Medics back then were a step ahead of voodoo witch-doctors but three steps behind of current medicine.
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Justin M.D. Nelson This made me laugh extremely hard, thank you lol
Justin M.D. Nelson Her longest lived child was only 11 when he died
I love the Total Annihilation reference. It was my favorite game as a kid.
so thousands of english people have royal blood in their veins it's just that their grand grand grand grand grand grand grand grand grand grand.....grandpa was not crowned king
NICE
*great
Actually make that every european and everyone with european ancestors.
I agree with you 100%
I'm certain there are still tons of ancestors still alive today scattered about the World from way back to even the Egyptian Pharaohs time, which has nothing to do with the U.K. nor the history of the monarch.
I told you they came from Sweden. 🐡🐠
Love from Michigan USA 💖
Peace ✌
@@rangerofnorrath4277 I am guessing everyone is: ruclips.net/video/15Uce4fG4R0/видео.html
@@l.lautsprecher3446 "European"is not a nationality, race or ethnicity. Germanic Europeans are from Caucasus and descendants of native Caucasians Waynakhs. South Europeans are from North Africa, India and Middle East. East Europeans are gypsies, Persians and Asians
Fun fact: the birth of Queen Elizabeth II predates the invention of bread slicers by two years.
She comes from the pre-sliced white bread era.
GAPS NO SLICED BREAD???
@@hyzmarie
Gaps?
@@thebaldcat6708 *gasp
Have you heard about knives? You know, to slice bread with?
So a loaf a bread 👍
How to impress your Parents and girlfriend.
Explain them about Royal family from 1066.
I think that's a great 'how to piss your parent's and girlfriend off'.
i would be impressed actually
How to look really smart in college history 101
impressive
If you REALLY want to annoy/impress, Horrible Histories did a delightful song to help remember the order and key details:
ruclips.net/video/40qOAcz5bUM/видео.html
This video was so unrelevant for so long..
BUT, it was released EXACTLY 7 years ago!
King Charles III has just entered the Buckingham Palace - September 9th, 2022.
CGP Grey knew already the day and the year, releasing this video 7 years ago, honoring the Queen's 70 years reign.
Impressive work, CGP Grey!
(how did you know, if you can tell us)
I just noticed too that this was posted exactly to the date, but of course several years prior
Hii im in 15th September 2022 :>
Condolences to all students in one of the country with super long history... namely China and UK.
And a congratulations to all the history students in countries where Britain erased the culture and left them with less history to learn
Many countries in Europe have a *VERY* long history. I guess you're amercian as you say that
My country doesn't have long history perse, but it has multiple small kingdoms(like 40s of them) that very matter to our history so the history books still thick as hecm
@ÇŞ Ö Italy too
@@bebekdragon7604 Sounds like Germany to me
"Marrying a commoner AN AMERICAN COMMONER AN AMERICAN COMMONER DIVORCEE twice over"
*LE GASP*
@AgingPeak so much for a pure bloodline. Harry's ancestors probably spit on his name every day.
@@user-xs1is9yd5oSo you think members of the British royal family shouldn't marry Americans?
@@shudheshvelusamy7644 no, its because Markle isnt wh1t3.
Escandalo
edward viii was also a nazi symp
Richard the 3 “bestest uncle promising to take care of his brothers son Edward future king”
Edward : goes missing mysteriously
Richard : 😮
Thanks!
"Not every child matter" what I think my parents sometimes think
😂😅
same😐
James
James
James
James
James
*Mary Queen of Scots*
James
PHmapping XD!! Favorite part!
take a guess on my middle name
Dark Spirit JASON
ma name is james
- Mary Queen of Scots is off!
- Can I have James instead?
- You mean James, James, James, James, James, James and James?
- Yes!
- Ugh!
all i hear is
George, Charles, James, Scott, Mary, William, Henry,
In France it just Louis
and Edward lol
and charles
And Richard
Huh where did Scott come from?
0:07 Pangaea stopped existing when the majority of its inhabitants voted for pangexit
James, James, James, James, James, Mary Queen of Scots, James
james
James
James
James
james
Fun fact: if Victoria had no sons or if all of them died, the line would have merged with the Hohenzollerns, making Kaiser Wilhelm II the British monarch. If we used the modern rules from Victoria onwards, Willy really would have been the King, since his mother was Victoria’s eldest child.
Somewhat interestingly, this would mean that the British would have a 100% legitimate claim to France as well, since Wilhelm was an indirect descendant of Napoleon.
This is even stranger when you consider that Napoleons direct descendant, Napoleon IV, died in combat as a British soldier in the Anglo-Zulu wars
Oh wow that would have changed the European history *a lot*
Now that's the alternate history novel I want to read
😩 [shuddering at the thought]
What about if absolute primogeniture was applied since 1066?
Suddenly, the Game of Thrones makes MORE sense.
omggg94 omf HAHAHA
omggg94 yes it does... I'm a science student... Yet I'm here you know why because of my new found love for history from that bloody game of thrones 😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂
Yes and although Game of Thrones borrows from a lot of countries’ history, the main premise is the English Wars of the Roses (“wars” because it was a series of wars to claim the throne). It was epic, violent and very, very complicated but also thrilling to learn about. You couldn’t make it up.
David Renton Yes I know it is. But George Martin himself has said in interviews that he was mainly influenced by the English Wars of the Roses - which was a real life series of brutal wars for the crown that went on for years between the houses of Lancaster and York. Nobody could deny the ressemblance with Lannister and Stark? Look up the Wars of the Roses and you will see for yourself that the parallels are unmistakable.
The RUclips algorithm always serve the best videos at the right time.
And even though he lost america and his mind
NeVeR FeAr ThE RuLeS ArE HeRe
That's becoming my new moto
Wow😂😂😂😂😂😂
I laughed so hard
I don’t get it for some reason.
What does that mean?
Wait a sec, in between George II and George III there's "Frederick"... you didn't expound on that, who is he? (I'm too busy to look it up I have to research Burundi and Cambodia right now, I'll just come back here when someone can elaborate for me.)
keep up the good work man. I really enjoy your channel
Frederick died before he could become the king. I think he fell from his horse. Anyway I like your videos!
+Geography Now With Primogeniture the crown will pass to the son of the current King, who, if is dead, ie Frederick will pass to any legitimate children he has.
Fredrick died before his father did, but left a son, who then became King upon the death of his grand father.
+Geography Now Hey Paul! Nice seeing you here. Love your work and your style. Waiting your next vid. Cya!
+Geography Now It's Paul! You're the best man! Makes me smile everytime I see you around youtube!
I've watched this 5 times and I still don't fully get the super messy time part. Fuck sake Britain
Image 13137
Elizabeth was illegitimate in the eyes of the Catholic Church. Half of England was Catholic and half was Protestant and it sparked wars across Britain. The Catholic half wanted Mary Queen of Scots on the throne because she was Catholic and a legitimate heir, as did the Vatican, Spain, France. BUT she was Scottish and French and that didn't sit well with the law which described that the English monarch should be English.
No one wanted Elizabeth, but then Scotland became Protestant and Mary of Scots had made some terrible marriage decisions which lost her the confidence of her own people.
Mary Queen of Scots had a son who grew up Protestant, and Elizabeth said that James VI of Scotland would become king IF he consented to the execution of his mother Mary. It's a seriously complicated rivalry and it'd take you months to learn it all but that's the scope of it, religious wars and Elizabeth being viewed by half her country as "the wrong queen"
tacos mexicanstyle I just finished the TV series "Reign". Reading your comment was just like having a recap of the series. I fell in love with Mary. (Well, the personality of Mary in the TV series). Long live Queen Mary of Scots! Long may she reign! 😅😅😅
Coming back to check up on the timeline following the unfortunate passing of Elizabeth II