Cop Gets SUED After LOSING CONTROL
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 ноя 2024
- Second Channel: / @johnlang6593
Spotify: spoti.fi/439TpHT
Patreon: / audittheaudit
Twitter: / audittheaudit
Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com
Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.
This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.
Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video: • Coweta County deputies...
AccountabilityMatters2023’s channel: / @accountabilitymatters...
GoFundMe Campaign: gofund.me/2bb6...
Sources:
Court records (Case # 23CR0536)- www.cowetastat...
Ga. Code § 40-8-76.1- bit.ly/3qyGdhF
Durruthy v. Pastor- bit.ly/47IA2bu
Stephens v. DeGiovanni- bit.ly/44kl1ti
Hines v. Jefferson- bit.ly/3KKEHQo
Draper v. Reynolds- bit.ly/3ONnCpQ
Ga. Code § 16-10-24- bit.ly/3IJor0T
Hudson v. State- bit.ly/3QOm7e2
Council v. State- bit.ly/47AdZDP
Pearson v. State- bit.ly/47Efj8F
Green v. State- bit.ly/44iCOkE
Bacon v. State- bit.ly/3qGCSNn
![Twenty One Pilots - “The Line” (from Arcane Season 2) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/E2Rj2gQAyPA/mqdefault.jpg)
The cops were basically waiting for him to do something to use as an excuse to “protect and serve”. Just hostile for no reason. Nothing worse than bored cops.
There’s reasons for every thing
Power-hungry insecure cops are worse. But i hear you that a bored insecure cop is a horrible combination.
@@yoface938 what does that mean?
@@yoface938be careful or you might choke on that boot
Bored terrorist....
Power trip and ego... this cop is a danger to the public
I love officers like this. Teach yall stupid retarded generation to do as you're told and obey commands and respect our law enforcement
All cops are danger to the public.
They have a great need of adrenalin to fill their desires. All while hiding behind a badge and lethally weapons. Rats
"Comply or Die!"
He's the exact type of person they want doing this job.
The people saying he needs to lose his job fail to understand that.
We work for them now, they don't work for us. Think I'm wrong? Stop paying the excessive amount of taxes we have, watch what happens.
Why the fuck are we paying taxes with already taxed income???
This country's been on a bad path for the better part of a century, and it's only going to get worse.
My husband is an ex convict who has taken care of his family for the past 22 years without reoffending. He is constantly harassed by the cops in our county who have been so petty they've hemmed him up sometimes for over an hour for a tailight being out among other stupid things. If anyone thinks these animals are on your side or won't single you out think again.
Yea, there's no justice anymore. If a person serves their time for a crime, they should have a clean slate, not be harassed for the rest of their lives.
They are NOT animals but TYRRANTS and EVIL PEOPLE who are the enforcers of the tyrrants in government
That's a blatant violation of the 4th amendment and he should have or should now proceed with legal action.
Extending a traffic stop after the original basis of the stop has been completed is an illegal seizure of your persons. Rodriguez V US is one of the many cases that have verified this.
Would be a shame if someone took justice into their own hands.
More "us vs them" bs. This needs to change.
The fact that an officer can slam you to the ground, taze you, restrain you by the neck and claim it's because you're "not listening" and this is not unconstitutional shows how truly broken the judicial system is when assessing the 4th amendment.
It shows you that police departments create illegal policies and police unions back them up.
Why are they allowed to turn off their body cameras? That's extremely suspicious and problematic.
Because when they interview witnesses and CI’s they don’t want that on camera. That’s the legit reason…then you have the bad cops that turn it off when they are about to break the law. Body cams should only be turned off in the situations I mentioned above and when they use the restroom. If they turn it off any other time, they should get fired.
I wonder if anyone has ever gotten a person who is great at lip reading to try to find out what these punks are trying to hide!
@@FloridaCatholicGuy I'd take it one step further for documentation purposes. The control of the cam should not be in the officers hands. They should be remotely operated, automatically turned on at the beginning of a shift, & only able to be turned off by requesting it through dispatch or some other channel. That way it is officially documented that the officer had his body cam turned off. Then there can't be no gray area as to when & why the body cam was turned off. Making it much easier to ascertain if the cam was turned off for a legitimate reason or not.
@occamsrazorblade can't be live streaming people's address and personal info.
We need to investigate them for suspicious behavior. They need to be held in cells for our safety.
1. This is for a seat belt
2. The guy is not fleeing
3. There is no danger presented by the guy
4. Multiple officers have him pinned down already.
This does not seem like an appropriate time to escalate force.
Graham factors are important.
It wasn’t really for the seatbelt though. Police don’t pull someone out of the car over a seatbelt violation. The cop just didn’t like his attitude. He didn’t receive overwhelming amount of ass kissing and it hurt his ego.
THAT IS WHY THE NAZIS ARE TRYING TO DISARM US. AMERICANS NEED TO WAKE UP FROM THESE FASCISTS DURING THE ILLEGAL LOCKDOWNS. WE ARE LIVING IN NAZI GERMANY
@xanithrustygaming6911 - Classic first amendment retaliation. Pulled from the car for using his rights. The cops need to be sued in federal court, not state court.
@@xanithrustygaming6911Exactly, clear case of contempt of cop.
He was trying to surrender himself peacefully and they still attacked him anyway. No good deed goes unpunished.
@@TheDogGoesWoof69 so the fuck what, words don't hurt you. When they attacked him he was being cooperative and not confrontational at all trying to give up a pocket knife to make the officers feel more at ease. You can't be on the cops side because he "wasn't nice," seriously gtfo with that garbage take.
@@TheDogGoesWoof69right the cop definitely was trying to rev him up! And being so sarcastic so cute… only to have the charges dropped lol they didn’t want to see that video in court 😂
This is why you never cooperate with the police, he should have just kept his knife where it was and sat there, not saying a word to them.
according to his wife, they've done this to him before. I can see exactly why he came off hostile to them.........
That's why you just stay in your car with your doors locked and your window cracked. Treat it like being briefly kidnapped by a gang of armed thugs, you don't want to get any closer to them then you have to. Only exit your vehicle when ordered.
Threatening to arrest someone if they’re going to pursue the law, should be 100% revocation of qualified immunity.
There is nothing that a cop can't make worse.
Contempt of cop can result in bodily injury up to & including death.
pppp0ppp0
@@utubepunkContempt of cop is your God given right.
,
@@EricFullwoodnegative
This whole encounter is infuriating, but IMO the worst part is that they added charges AFTER they found out he was lawyering up. They had to double down their bad behavior by trying to punish this person for perusing his constitutional rights.
Yep, a clear reflection of the DAs office....they have about the same level of integrity as cops.
At least the DA dropped it when he did. Sometimes the DA will drag it out as long as they can only to drop it after everyone is there to go to court. Since this case has had a lot of exposure that may be why they dropped it so soon.
If they wanted to call it what it is "witness intimidation", it would stop real fast.
Any time an officer tells someone that they will raise charges if the person seeks to sue, it should really raise some red flags for internal affairs and courts. The fact that it doesn't, and so many officers get to walk away from doing something illegal just shows how terrible the system is
More than that it’s an outright admission of a retaliatory civil rights violation. They cannot give unequal protection as a consequence of seeking redress. The constitutional case should be open and shut. The fact that it’s not means the people have a lot of housecleaning to do in the judiciary. Maybe the first step is abolishing the bar.
Nothing will ever change in this country. 1/3 of the country blindly backs the blue and swollows the boot
But there's no proof, the bodycam was off. Not by accident, either.
Internal affairs is the last entity that needs to be investigating - themselves. Hence the redundant lack of accountability involving these matters. It's all a direct result of premeditated perniciousness which involves zero-accountability for certain entities. That's precisely what's been taking place over and over again, yet people still think IA will ''investigate'' themselves properly and hold themselves responsible. It's just beyond ridiculous!
They should be instantly arrested for intimidation of a witness.
Bullying and abuse of power need to be worthy of termination, and there needs to be a separate department to investigate complaints
Nothing says "public safety" more than beating the crap out of someone for not wearing a seat belt.
"How many times do we have to teach you this lesson, old man!"
The best is being pulled over by a motorcycle cop and issued a citation for not wearing a seatbelt.
BE SAFER, BE SAFER!
Yes, thank **[Deity]** they got this menace to society off the highway that day! Just imagine the havoc he could have wreaked once he had a full tank of fuel and no seatbelt!
@@ColonelSandersFingerand to
Think about school buses and public buses have none
“If he had been polite I would have worked with him.” He doesn’t even realize that people are not legally obligated to be nice to him. The egos on some of these cops, I swear to God.
At 9:10, the officer says, "If he'd just shut up.". This officer, actually, both of these officers are a liability to the PD. But, I suspect with both of them going full force so quickly, this holier than thou attitude likely comes from the top. The good thing I can see is that the officers weren't allowed to watch their body cams prior to writing up their report because they made a couple of glaring errors, ie "95 him!" was in the report as telling him he was under arrest. Given what took place, I thought a "95" must be "take him to the ground "
Exactly. Pig unknowingly admired they only arrested him because he wasn’t licking their boots.
Say it with me, first amendment retaliation
@@MrTwofishes how was it 1st ammendment retaliation though? he wasn't filming or using speech. he simply didn't obey the officers' every command like a dog--i mean, a programmed robot whose only function is to do every little thing asked of them.
Oh shut up
Wait... The IA department cannot even investigate a reported police crime unless the criminal's boss, who totally doesn't want such a scandal, first signs off? That's so corrupt it's ridiculous.
That caught my attention, too. There's something very wrong with that policy!
Where's the part where the officers were sued?
Their bosses, who make the laws, want it this way. If you vote for someone else, they will also want it this way.
@@thetavibes9021obviously that’s not going to be in the video of why they got sued to begin with. that’s a separate entity
@@TeewopShiesty Pretty obvious when it's in the title. (You would think) I understand why it wouldn't display the relevancy regarding the title or topic for more clicks. But that would still be false advertising now, wouldn't it?
Tyrants like these need the sh!t sued out of them, big time. This nonsense has to stop.
sued < beat
sued? they need to get locked up
This is unreal. You can see how excited he gets. He says he is going to take him to jail over a supposed seat belt violation. This is why a people hate cops.
Hey I’ve seen guys in jail for a seat belt violation. Happens all the time. Of course the fall out from doing jail time for anyone can get them to lose a job, screw up one’s life for this, etc.
Peace of Mind out.
We all know how bad he wanted to kill him. Unfortunately he wasn’t able to escalate enough to do that it seems.
I have hundreds of reasons to hate these blue cowards.
@@zackmagic4242 sure tried! Grabbing him by the throat should be attempted murder.
@@zackmagic4242 Probably why he didn't want to take the knife when he was informed about it.
All of this over a questionable seatbelt. They couldn’t wait to attack him.
Gotta release them tax funded roids
That seat belt was just an _excuse!_ Take another look at that guys truck and see if you can't detect a possible _political_ motivation.
@@WXSEDYI guess the cops don’t like Metal Gear Solid or something.
An "alleged" seat belt violation turned into a "You didn't kiss my ass" violation.
The victim was right about the biggest gang in the country.
Everyone is a bad guy to these thugs.
Earning the well-deserved hate every day.
Meanwhile, the victims' whole life is turned upside down for months if not years over an "alleged" seat belt violation.
As a retired veteran and minority I have been a victim of the police countless times and imprisoned over LETTERS or visited over comments on youtube by local to federal like DHS, FBI, MARSHALLS etc.
This deputy is itching to blow somebody away...
Welcome to the Idiocracy, morons rule.
If everyone is a bad guy, doesn't that include Badges?
Just recently I was reading a fictional novel where an ex L.A. detective stated that he had belonged to one of the biggest gangs in the country...the police department. I hadn't ever thought that way. Before.
That Metal Gear wrap on his truck is pretty incredible
The whole 'don't pull away' thing always pisses me off. Pulling away is an instinctive reaction to an unexpected grab or unwanted touch and takes time for the brain to consciously reverse the decision.
I know! It's like throwing a punch towards someone's face and charging them if they flinch. Bunch of jerks
Right, it's like telling someone not to flinch then kicking them in balls
Grinds my gears too. Classic cop shit, like shouting contradicting orders. Apparently human nature is resisting arrest.
That is such a great point and well said. When someone puts their hands on you, it's a natural reaction to defend ourselves, regardless of who the person is and whether he's wearing a badge and carrying a gun.
It’s a tactic they use to gaslight people.
It’s crazy how a 16 year old kid can be fired for sighing in frustration after being scolded by an upset customer yet cops can grab someone by the throat and taser them while they are on the ground after he complied and kee their job is crazy.
The power of unions
@@ternuscleargullyiii8154 it's not unions
The power of clubs.
Utterly disgusting.
It depends on the cop. For most cops, it takes something pretty big to get them fired, or even seriously reprimanded. But if you happen to be the unpopular cop who believes in actually doing their job properly without fear or favor, then it won't take much to get shoved out the door.
This is what i've been saying too. We hold McDonalds employees to a higher standard than cops. A McDonalds employee can't even sit down to rest their feet for 5 seconds without immediate termination, yet a cop can kill people and get away with it with promotion and bonuses. Why do we accept this?
Not saying you are being detained or you're under arrest.Straight to the ground.
3:44 Didn't say shit and whipped him to the ground. Not even given an opportunity to comply.
You got a problem with officers using excessive force??? I would say it's fair game
@@Daxx871xxx "excessive" force is a problem by definition. Meaning it's excessive. Duh.
@@fftunes smh yall act so entitled like officers not allowed to do their jobs however they want
@@Daxx871xxxyou're a fool
10:01 "That was completely preventable." -Cop
Yep, it sure was. If the cop would have acted like a reasonable human, none of this would have had to happen.
“After he just fought with us”?? This cop did not even try to understand this young man. He talked over him and did not need to throw him to the ground. I’ve seen good cops deal with people and this cop chose to escalate the encounter.
Only in America is everyone so "customer is always right" that they think they can disobey lawful orders and use language that will get you slapped by someone without a badge, yet they want leniency😂
How about not being a cunt unless you're standing on rock solid ground. I love the videos of citizens being morally and legally correct, but I also love the videos where the asshole that flips off the cop just so happens to have an expired tag.
It's called _profiling!_ Clearly, race had _nothing_ to do with it (I assume). Take another look at that trucks paint job in case you don't think it may have been _political!_ No, that's NOT DJT, but it did bear a strong resemblance and also seemed to suggest a political discontent (hostility) too. So naturally, anyone with any sort of authority wanting to correct a low-wage _serf_ like that would need a legal _excuse_ to have an "interaction" with him.
Right? It seemed to me he was just trying to prevent his head from smashing into the pavement, not fighting with them.
@@jer280My issue is less "the customer is always right is bogus" (which it is) and more the fact that expectations for cops is outrageously low in terms of how they interact with people and respond to things.
I was a medic in the Air Force. After I got out, I worked at a call center, in retail, as a receptionist, and now in a hospital setting.
Nothing the cops are hearing is any different or worse than what you get from some lady who was late to her appointment and blames you for it, or from someone pissed off that the coupon their trying to use is expired. But while retail people and receptionists must remain calm, courteous, empathetic, and polite or else they can lose their jobs, cops can immediately use force and arrest people.
I don't think its unreasonable to expect at LEAST the same amount of de-escalation and self-control from a cop that one expects from a cashier at Target.
@@ladyofrillwater I expect people to kick assholes out of the store, and they shouldn't be fired for it. I do agree cops should have more control, if the guy had not immediately tried to shake loose from them it wouldn't have been bad, it actually seemed that they were gone just slap cuffs on him for being an asshole that doesn't want to follow directions.
I think we need a federal standard that contradicting the police report and body cam footage is subject to a 250,000 fine and a lost of the ability to be a peace officer anywhere in the USA.
Contradicting = Lying.
A police report is a legal document, holding the same weight as testimony. Therefore, it's perjury. And yet, no officer has EVER been criticized for lying deliberately on his report.
It's already a crime. It's perjury. You need DAs willing to prosecute dirty cops.
Honestly yeah
That would be a slippery slope. The cop is going from memory when he writes the police report. I mean it could be as simple as "subject walked up to me and said hey" and body cam footage shows he walked up to the cop and said "Whats up?" I mean would the cop get fined for that? It's by definition a contradiction with the body cam footage.
@@brandonhebert5485then they shouldn’t falsify data to be specific- easily could say the subject said a greeting to me.
How is that not blackmail for them to say "Take this to court and we increase the charges"? At the very least they are trying to intimidate him into not saying them and that can't be even remotely close to legal.
That's what I'm thinking...... And then it all happened exactly as stated.
Because it is illegal. But courts don't often actually enforce the few consequences for cops that they are supposed to, so is it really a law if it isn't enforced?
Judges also have certain restrictions in what they are allowed to do, but if they ever violate those restrictions it never gets inforced either, because a council of judges has to enforce the consequences for those violations, and that almost never happens either. And it is much, much scarier when you have a corrupt judge who breaks the rules.
That's clearly not blackmail.
@@adamweiser2515, it is extortion.
That sounds like extortion. They basically told him "Give us your complete cooperation, or we'll f**k up your life." It's no different than a street gang shaking down business owners for 'protection' money so they don't get robbed every day.
I live in Newnan. Born and raised. Our police force is a complete joke. And that's putting it nicely.
Imagine thinking you're justified beating the crap out of someone because they didn't wear a seat belt
Buddy, cops KNOW they can do these things because right wingers back the blue. They backed bad cops and this will continue to happen
When have a cop ever told the truth?
I mean at least they kept him safe ... holup
Well elsewhere in this video it's mentioned of an officer getting away with dragging a young teenage girl by the neck for two minutes, so really, why fear any repercussions at all? Seems like cops can do whatever they want so long as the media and general public don't raise much of a fuss, and even then a cop will just get paid leave and join a new department in a different location.
Imagine sexually assaulting someone, then beating a young teen to the point they lose concious and are hospitalised, you are found guilty. You then get transfer to another department along with a promotion as chief. I no longer get surprised with the level of corruption within the Police force noth here in the UK and the US.
How are the additional charges not seen as retaliation for the lawsuit? Even without being a detective that deals with these things every day, that is a clear and easy outcome to come to after seeing the dates on the tickets
I agree . Why charge for a felony later? Even the prosecutor dropped everything.
Exactly what it is.....Courts should take notice....
Can we talk about the horrible precedents in the 11th circuit on the use of force? Those cases basically give cops full reign to speak with their weapons first and cases like this one are open and shut abuse and wrongful use of force without those ridiculous precedents protecting these thugs.
A lot of these precedents were set before video footage and interpreted with bias to the advantage of the government.
The 11th Circuit Court covers Alabama, Georgia and Florida; which is basically lawless swamp land. So, it tracks.
Absolutely! This is how cops are allowed to abuse the public. It is called the good ole boy system. I come from a small Virginia town and this is how it works. I despise this type of behavior. Protect and serve not harassment and abuse!
Sounds like some judges need to be slammed to the ground so they can properly assess how relevant that kind of force is.
@jaywinner328 Agreed, specifically the ones who precided over the cited cases. I was strongly considering a family vacation in Georgia but it was postponed by the pandemic until 2024. After hearing those precedents, I'm doubtful I'll resume planning.
That cop sounded so excited when he said “ohh that’s another one”, he was getting off on it.
The cop was being condescending and rude right out of the gate. I have a hard time believing that these two don't have a history.
I hope someone treats these cops the exact same way someday.
And the driver wasn't?
@@ianbattles7290actually we are treated that way DAILY. Yet people like you wonder why police officers can come off as harsh?
@@hook86that’s part of the job if it happens daily. It’s your responsibility to stay impartial. Not ours.
*both sides*
Each time he fought back against the unlawful charges, they increased the charges of obstruction.
These are the kinds of people, you do not ever want near a position of power and authority. This is why we need better mental/psychological testing for these positions.
Also, MUCH better civilian oversight to identify bad behavior on the job. Internal Affairs just scream conflict of interest.
@@jeepliving1 This as well absolutely
Ironic how they were obstructing justice by charging him with obstruction as payback for fighting the charges.
@@gta4everrr gang mentality. Which is what the dude was yelling at them how they were acting.
Seems like we need fewer positions of immense authority and power in our civilization. Too many law enforcement agencies 👎
The fact that they said they would add more charges if he took them to court should be a felony for the cops
I love this channel. I love the the fact that you research the statutes, the case law, and previous rulings from state supreme courts, and appellate courts, and breaking down these individual situations with neutrality. Thank you!
8:53 “I pull hundreds of cars over a year” Small town cops with nothing better to do except to collect revenue for the State. 9:20 “you are free to go. Get outta of here” Thats the level of respect this clown has for the citizens he serves. His chain of command better take notice of this thin skinned, man child.
Yeah. Too bad your English teachers didn’t take notice of your atrocious bastardizing of the language.
Newnan ain't that small. We're pretty much an Atlanta suburb
He probably got promoted after a paid vacation.
without cops writing tickets you'd hace assholes flying all over the place putting people in danger
Wrong
The WORST part is that internal investigators / superiors didn't find any misbehavior. Regardless of the legal outcome, there seems to be no one interested in being a professional, trusted, deescalation-focused police force whatsoever.
The whole police department is made up of tyrants and criminals with guns
THATS WHAT THE BRADY LIST IS FOR
This causes me to have Trust issues with the law enforcement really bad.
So, subject is on his back with a 200 + pound officer holding him down and the other officer TASES him because he is not putting his hands behind his back. Well THAT makes sense. They sure protected and served the crap out of him!!!! And they wonder WHY people hate them.
But, again, it shows another problem. That cops don’t call out their badly behaving colleagues. They stick up for each other instead of saying “Dude, that doesn’t make sense. Are you sure about this?” No, but I was in the mood for dispensing some excessive force and this taser isn’t gonna pick its own innocent victims. Protecting and serving nothing but their egos.
Yep and they do it on purpose. They give commands, make sure you can't comply, then assault you and charge you with resistance. Scum of the earth.
Now think about this. Imagine all the innocent people over the decades that went to prison, lost their lives, and are now felons because of the lies police have told. Body cams need to be mandatory across the country and turned on during their entire shift.
Well if they lost their lives they aren't felons anymore.
@@brandonhebert5485 is that supposed to be funny?
@@principlemethods5281Se ele não for bootlicker deve ser parente de algum bandido fardado
@@principlemethods5281No he is correct they just dead not felons anymore
@@enriqueperezarce5485no, they're not felons at all since they were never tried
Every time a 'crime' occurs AFTER a cop shows up, when there wasn't a crime prior to cops arrival IT IS THE COPS DOING. No one decides to commit a crime in a police officer's presence. It is ALWAYS because the cop NEGLECTED TO USE DE-ESCALIZATION TECHNIQUES and/or INSTIGATED ESCALATION THEMSELVES.
Lol! A little bit of an extreme absolute statement. Fully agree that this cop was just itching to go to force due to disrespect of authority or something like that, but I’ve also seen plenty of badge/dash cams where the suspect suddenly escalated to stupid levels for no good reason (drugs, alcohol, general lack of comprehension of cause/effect)
Why we could be able to fight back or protect ourselves from harm
Well, there was that video of the girl trying to stab another girl and her father assaulting another girl after the cops showed up. That's the one where the cops shot her, and the black community got all butthurt. You remember that one? Those two decided to commit a crime in the police officer's presence, so you might want to rethink all the caps in your post
@@Saffe1978ohhhhh victim mentality.
@@GoatsAndChickens123you have seen far more cops being wrong than you have cops being right. Cop isnt even top 20 most dangerous jobs. Most cops die from traffic accidents.
Snowflakes and snowflake defenders.
What a jerk. Completely rude and unprofessional. I hope he gets sued, charged, and fired.
That will never be done. Not in a southern state. Hopefully he sues
And,at a minimum, jailed for a very long time.
Kinda hard to put your hands behind your back when a copper has a hold of it, slinging him to the ground, and sitting on his chest.
That's part of the game for bad officers.
@@loki2240 Worst one is when there's like 5 of them on top of someone restraining them and shouting conflicting demands so they can't do anything other than be a punching bag until the officers get tired. If the good ones don't step in and stop it are they even good?
@@atwdbmeanwhile someone is probably getting skinned, really makes you think why cops just wanna do that shit even if they're bored, which is vulgar, I see that a forceful use by a officer should be reasonable protonated
Never underestimate the pettiness of a cop
These office's are despicable and need to be charged. The first one was driven by his ego, using his badge to cause chaos. The second was just as bad, stating the victim had violated many laws. which isn't the case. These tyrants should not be out in public and sent to prison for assault. Disgraceful!
I agree, unfortunately it seems all the legal presidents are in the cops favour. Laws need to be changed.
... At least they _smiled!_ 😈
Ordered his wife away like she was a dog. What an absolute bastard. Both of them.
Any judge that says this use of force was ' de minimis' should be subjected to similar force themselves, once a day until they quit lying.
Judges generally comply with lawful orders.
yes.... lets rule violence... good ideal bro......not!
reasonable force when perps don't comply with lawful orders@@gunjirox7485
😂😂😂😂
The force was reasonable if the arrest was lawful or if they actually told him. This case should definitely take those aspects into consideration.
He got off the car to let the cop know he has a knife... So he gets out to say "im done with him" and then arrests him. Dang, this cop really has a short fuse.
You skipped a step that they performed there.
They assaulted him BEFORE arresting him.
Telling another officer to " Ninety Five him" is not a verbal advisement of arrest.
The other cop just grabbed hi and slung him to the ground, without telling him he was under arrest.
Also. Didn't a president of the United States outlaw any kind of choke hold by law enforcement a few years back???
@@daverobson3084Never heard of anything about a president banning any kind of chokehold by officers. I don't even think the president has the authority to do that.
These officers were wrong and acted like bullies. Sad how they look down on you until proven wealthy
You say bullies ( and you’re not wrong), but I say cowards. Think about handcuffs used to shackle the man. They were terrified of the man, and it showed.
Where does wealth fit into this? Plenty of examples online make it clear they don’t respect anyone but themselves, whether you got money or not. Want to know why? Even a person of means who can sue, it’s not like officers are personally accountable; the tax payers pay for their mistakes.
@@brkbtjunkieoh no they care if you’re rich because that’s who elects their chain of command
Or connected...
"untill proven wealthy"...... thats a good one, gonna have to remember it
I now have backup, I'm not scared anymore, let's attack.
We investigate ourselves and find no wrongdoing.... wow I'm shocked. SHOCKED!!!
There hasn't been an acknowledgement of the officer's threat of filing felony charges if the defendant fought the misdemeanor charges, and the vindictiveness of them filing of new charges when the defendant actually hired an attorney and a started a legal defense. It also boils my blood when Internal Affairs finds nothing wrong with the officers' actions. The Thin Blue Line...
He turned off his camera so its only word against dirty cop
"Some of those that work forces.."
The timeline of events that showed him hiring a lawyer and felony charges being filed afterward doesn't hurt his claim
I'm beginning to have problems with "Internal Affairs". It is a bad word now.
@@matthewlewis1735 Turning it off cam/audio should immidietly be a felony charge that cannot be lowered + Tampering with evidence.
Clearly an excessive use of force in a situation caused by the cops. Shameful...
You know it's dirty when the DA watched the footage and drops all charges. They don't want a judge watching it. No seatbelt and not listening is punishable by death. Tazer is lethal force if you have a bad heart.
I'm impressed how much they protected and served that guy!
Them cops really protected and served the shit out of that innocent man.
Terror are not people from the middle east, The biggest terror are home grown, they are the police America pay terrorism every time they give police a check payed by tax payer
Shit I say that exact same thing all the time when i see their so-called "reasonable use of force" against an innocent person.
Because protecting and serving is just a facade really.
I'm feeling protected and served all the way over here in Australia.
@@hollzie7348 same here. A buddy of mine got his nose broken by a cop who protected and served him. My friend “Filipe” (obviously not his real name) pleaded the fifth. And the officer thought he was trying to obstruct justice and decided to pound the shit out of Filipe’s face. Filipe had to fight back the urge to return the favor (Filipe was a X Green Beret) and the officers precinct investigated themselves and found that there was no need for further investigation since “no constitutional violation was violated”. They patted themselves on the back and went to their houses feeling like heroes for beating up a guy who literally got stopped because the officer had to speed up to catch up to Filipe s truck. The officer said he was going 120 MPH to catch up to Felipe who was suspected of going 112 MPH. Truly sickening tbh.
@@natlegend isn’t Australia a prison colony? When I applied for citizenship to the Australia embassy I did not fill out the criminal records part. And when asked to complete that part of the form I asked “so is having a criminal background a mandatory or a minimum for citizenship”… I made the lady at the counter die laughing.
When a cop starts with "How about you give me a reason NOT to pull you over" says everything you need to know.
Cop has small P-P and definitely power tripping. Disgrace to the badge and should have his P.O.S.T. Certification revoked, then fired.
100%
There shouldn't be a button to turn cameras off. No need for it
“Just shut up and listen.”
Contempt of cop. The most dangerous crime in the USA.
Another great cop I keep hearing about, protecting and serving eh?? a real hero!!
Coward would be the perfect descriptor.
@@gregkasza1925he already called him a cop, calling him a coward is unnecessary
Warren v. DC, they are janitors unless you directly pay them off for protecting and/or serving
@@1DwtEaUn 1985 Supreme court decision?
@@mky9227 Justia lists it as 1981, but yes that one
"the fundamental principle that a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any particular individual citizen."
"PUT YOUR F***ING HANDS BEHIND YOUR BACK" while they held him down on his back
They need to be punished when they give commands that are impossible because of their own actions because they'll try to punish the citizen for failing to follow the impossible instructions
Guy recently got executed on his knees on video by police for failing to follow impossible/conflicting commands. They act like citizens are at war with them, maybe a sign of things to come...
if a cop gives you an order, then prevents you from following that order: wouldn't that be obstruction of justice by the cop? 🤔
Same with throwing someone to the ground, then calling it "resisting" when they don't just fall down. It's a natural and *involuntary* human reaction to stay upright, it's why we don't just fall on our faces every time we trip.
Cop says "that was completely preventable..." Lol 😂😂😂
More conflicting demands and not even announcing his arrest or telling him why? He’s about to get some taxpayer money
Remember guys, a seatbelt is there to protect you. Not from a car accident but from the police extortion and violence.
If the cops say you didn’t wear a seatbelt it’s hard for you to prove you were.
Mhmm.
@joelroldan3276bingo. The whole stance drifts after that or they will just a warning. Or if they really want to save face will write the ticket and just not show up
i get pulled even with a seatbelt, saying i wasn't wearing it
That's why I don't wear mine. Who do state legislators think they are, telling me what I must do to travel in my private property that I paid for?
The courts seem to absolutely reinforce this kind of tyranny and abuse.
They're all a part of the same gang. They've got each other's backs.
We, as citizens, need to unite more and protest for justice, by making the system hold officers accountable. Just like we did for George Floyd.
We need new judges
@@gta4everrr
Not a gang, a Terrorist organization. They use violence against citizens in order to affect a political and or social change, which means by definition they are Terrorists.
thats why electiona matter! Trump appointed over 200 federal judges in his term that will serve for the rest of their life! he singlehandedly moved the federal judiciary extreamly fart right. @@yayacentella
It is important to note that Georgia law (OCGA 17-4-23) restricts the authority of the officer to arrest after deciding to issue a citation. Young v. City of Atlanta, 1986 US Dist. LEXUS 26901: "Georgia traffic offender may only be physically arrested if, following citation for the offense, the offender fails to appear in court under O.C.G.A. § 17-4-23(b), if the arresting officer has personal knowledge that the offender was intoxicated to the extent that the offender was incapable of driving safely, or if one of the other factors of O.C.G.A. § 17-4-20 is present."
They are going to investigate themselves and conclude that these psychopathic cops are heroes. Also, the taxpayers are getting sued, the cops most like got paid vacations, hugs, and high-fives from their supervisors.
Law firms should set up a program to hire ordinary law abiding taxpayers to take the place of law enforcement’s
“INTERNAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT”. If this could happen all the video, witnesses, and police reports can be honestly and fairly be scrutinized and the “MALL COPS” will be fired, sued and pay for ALL LEGAL COSTS out of their own pockets instead of taxpayers pockets. This can’t go on forever.
The police might not have direct consequences from getting sued, but it does mean the city government and mayor will be breathing down their necks for losing them money. Not to mention all the bad PR for the sheriff who has to get re-elected.
“After he just fought with us” they literally kicked his ass. If they don’t remove qualified immunity they’ll keep doing this, I think they would think twice before doing this if it was removed.
I live in Fort Wayne, Indiana. A couple months back, an officer (with prior driving convictions) was negligent and ran over and ultimately killed a pedestrian. This past week, he was ordered to pay $35.50, and was back driving and working the next day. Could you break down how this would be possible in an upcoming video?
I can break it down quicker and more concise than a video. Rules for thee, but not for me. It's a club and you ain't in it.
All cases that have been overturned need to be deleted from the system because these tyrants use old case law everyday
he was trying to do the right thing and these cops’ ego was so big they didn’t listen to his ACCEPTABLE reasoning and immediately arrested him for zero reason
Yeah, he goes "hey guys, I forgot I have a knife, can you come get it?" and that equals non compliance? 😂 These cops are trigger happy morons.
Sad thing mr audit the audit doesn’t provide the contact details of the departments
YUPPP 😢 it's always the EGO AND CONTROL
He pulled away from them, also if you didn’t know if you commit literally ANY traffic infraction you can be arrested, the cop has no obligation to give you a ticket, there was plenty of reason to arrest him
@knightmarecx2069 please tell me what was the reason he arrested the human being? U don't listen is not against the law.
Remember, not wearing a seatbeat, is a beatable offense.
The audacity.
I remember when seatbelt laws first started being passed how civil liberties groups were saying that they would just be used as a ploy to turn more people into criminals
well we can see the future, we just cant avoid it.
Neither officer was in fear of his life. No taser is to be employed. No resistance was used. No need to throw a person onto asphalt.
No need to detain them or order them out of the car at all; contempt of cop is not a crime.
Hiring a lawyer is a clear obstruction of justice! 🤦🏻♂️
And the Constitution keeps the CROOKED COPS from doing their JOB.
I don’t blame him from pulling away. There was no reason to take him to the ground other than police street justice. In other words put a hurt on him and know they can add resisting charges. Who here wants to be thrown face first into the ground when you weren’t resisting or even told you were under arrest? Your natural instinct is to protect yourself. And that’s what they know you’ll do which can lead to them putting more hurt on you and charges. Laws need to be changed
We should not have to allow anyone, regardless of their group affiliation, to man handle us. It's terrorizing what we have to allow at the hands of "law enforcement" officers!
gay
oh man handle us,,,,no, its idiots like you why are country is in the shape it is, why crime is out of control. Ppl like your attitude " Oh don't man handle me". Then comply, give your ID, take your ticket and take it to court.... Dont run your elfin mouth, then resist, yelling like a dog in heat,
I agree to a point. That guy that stole the water and power truck needed a bazooka. Those cops kept screaming less lethal. 8 ruined patrol cars and 140 bullets later the suspect was grazed on the hand and was booked and released. California aint georgia
@@GodofWhoopasshow many “your mom” comments did you leave on this channel bro
@@GodofWhoopass is just another trolling nasty blue line Gestapo teabagging apologist or one of the nasty blue themselves
But, again, it shows another problem. That cops don’t call out their badly behaving colleagues. They stick up for each other instead of saying “Dude, that doesn’t make sense. Are you sure about this?” No, but I was in the mood for dispensing some excessive force and this taser isn’t gonna pick its own innocent victims. No protecting nor serving anything but their over-inflated and fragile egos.
Informing an arrestee that they are, in fact, "under arrest" should be a more fundamental requirement than reading them their Miranda rights. Without this, the state of being "under arrest" exists only in the police officer's head.
I was on a jury where I successfully argued that a resisting arrest charge shouldn’t hold because there was no evidence presented that he was told he was under arrest.
@@TrekBeatTKgood man!
@@TrekBeatTKthank you.
What a hero. “Am I free to go?” “Yeah, get out of here.” Protecting and serving. 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Why police think they can just talk down to people like they're a bad children is beyond me.
Because they get away with
“You gonna learn today!” Lol. I don’t know why officer say shit like that.
What’s the worst that will happen to the cop? A paid vacation punishment-taxpayers pay the settlements and once public attention dies down the cop gets a promotion. Hell Tyre’s murderers are still enjoying their freedom-I think they may have spent a few minutes in jail so far for brutally beating a man to death on camera. If they do end up going to prison they get sent to a woman’s prison with special protection.
because they can
Becsuse they are children.
They act better than everyone, have zero consequences for their actions, and are constantly babied by the government
I love how everyone thats a cop talks about how traumatic and dangerous and hard on you the job is, yet when you tell them to stop serving after becoming mentally damaged says “no i love this job” like dude you get kicked out of the military for way less yet we let you morons continue enforcing law and order in your compromised positions. Sad.
They make their job hard in most cases
Did you know working the night shift at a liquor store is more dangerous than being a cop? They did studies and about a dozen jobs that teen girls do are more dangerous than cop.
Yep, and you can't blame all of this on boomers either.
Seeing as we have a dementia patient and a senate minority leader striking out twice on t.v.? Im not shocke anymore.
Problem is, cops are liars, and they know that their job is 2% as difficult as they make it sound. A lumberjack is in far greater danger, and they don't complain and moan about their safety as much as cops do.
7:16 im sorry what the actual hell is wrong with that officer that is no way to treat a human being, id be livid if i saw someone pick a dog up by its neck let alone a WHOLE HUMAN BEING, and to make it even worse he did that to a minor not justifying what he did at all because its never okay to do that but what was he thinking? sorry that just made me unreasonably angry, my introverted very antisocial self would have yelled at them to "set her down and treat her like a fucking human being. in what twisted universe is it okay to carry someone by their fucking neck" if someone picked me up by my neck im gonna do everything i can to press assault charges, hell i almost pushed assault charges on some kids in middle school for repeatedly fucking with my hair, there is no way carrying a whole ass human by their neck would ever be okay. again sorry but that is absolutely not okay.
Why do cops have the ability to turn off their body cams?
It keeps the lawsuits down.
Because we allow them
turn off the body cams, "lose" the footage, technical problems retrieving the footage... if they want to make sure their actions aren't memorialized they'll find a way
This could all have been avoided if had dropped to his knees, licked the cops boots and said, "Thank you for correcting me Sir. It won't happen again." The cop's paper-thin ego would have been satisfied, and his sense of superiority over 'civilians', as I've hear them refer to their fellow citizens, would have been reaffirmed.
Maybe. Maybe not. You can never really predict what unstable people will actually do.
That's 50/50 at best
Haha!
@@cherylmcelveen2817You mean unstable cops.
You forgot the most basic of the cops needs to be eased. He needed to slob the cops knob (AKA an Alabama breathalyzer) & wash his cruiser with the blood of the "enemy"...oops, "civilians" to get on his good side.
and the worst part? not a single cop will call out these pigs. they'll just sit behind their thin blue line making the relationship with the community even worse
Yep.
Wipe your tears.
Fire them. The cop admits his behavior is justified by the man not being polite. Wow the cops are enforcing manners not the law.
Lawsuit against both of them and make sure they lose their badges
I had to read the name to see if I had written it
So he was arrested because he upset that cop? This Country is unbelievable! You can get arrested for anything!
And in recent ruling they can also arrest and then invent probable cause after.
Remember it's about you hurting my feelings...
Defund the police
Lol y’all ain’t ganna defund nothing you peons go back to work and own nothing and be happy.
You can be arrested at any time even if you are not breaking any laws. If a cop doesn't understand the laws you are going to pay for it. Why can't they protect and serve? Stop beating ppl up
If I've said it once I've said it 1000 times. We need to end police quotas. Period. This entire ridiculous situation that the police escalated might not of even been initiated otherwise. Sickening.
Quotas are actually not permitted. Not that it justifies this.
@@iolitelight Officially no. But my law enforcement friends and family, off the record say otherwise.
Think about it, how else are they going to make sure officers are "working". Sure, some departments may enforce this stuff more than others. But overall though... we need to find another way of monitoring officers that doesn't mean "let's harrass the public so it looks like we are doing something".
@@iolitelight It may be one of those "wink wink" deals: they're told there are no quotas when they actually exist.
@@DarkMikaruX yeah, also I've heard police claim their precinct doesn't give out quotas, but then they give out awards for things like catching the most DUI's that give "credit" to the officer. so they can claim they don't have quotas but AS USUAL FOR COPS- they're bending the truth to fit their benefit while they turn around and act differently.
end qualified immunity.
What ever happened to protect and serve? Is this how they protect you when you don't wear a seatbelt?
The courts and the prosecutors are a huge problem with ridiculous egos.
I have lost faith in courts and the police.
@@sunshine8556true. like holy shit these officers would be able to be held accountable if the courts and judges would do what’s right 🤦♂️
So everyone keep this in mind. A police officer can touch you and take you to the ground if they deem that force to be “De minimis”.
This is crazy.
I could see if it was a felony/violent crime arrest but that's about it. No warning at all is crazy
Seems like the cops were having a slow day and couldn't wait for some drama to occur even if they had to be the ones to create it.
This was an obviously retaliatory stop - and the officer most definitely used excessive force - as a resident of GA - this officer is a threat to the people around him!
"if he had been polite and tried to work with me I would have helped him out". There you go, he did this to the man because he didn't get the respect he felt he deserved.
No bigger crime than contempt or disrespect of cop.
Pulling away or flinching when someone attempts to grab you is as natural as throwing cold water on someone and they take a deep breath. It's an involuntary response that we all have.
Hell. According to what the narrator said, squirming when someone is carrying you around by your neck is trying to resist.
If the person doing the choking is a cop and the person being choked is a mere citizen.
@@daverobson3084 Exactly. These judges are interpreting these laws to allow the cops to do anything they want on purpose and to protect the police and cities from being sued.
Boys when you sue a cop for illegal arrest. That's also kidnapping by the law. And assault. File those charges on them also.
Idk what's more disturbing this, or the 14 year old girl that was restrained by her neck, or those that reviewed these events & said "Yup this is totally Constitutional!!!" WTF!?! America!?!
Samir(12), Carolina (60), Karen Gardner (83, dementia) Sonja Massey; the list goes on and on and on