5 REASONS WHY THE SONY 18-105MM IS A MUST HAVE LENS FOR THE A6400

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 29 янв 2025

Комментарии • 231

  • @eusouthaypelomundo
    @eusouthaypelomundo 3 года назад +9

    I use this lens on my recent video and I'm SO HAPPY! Used to have the sigma 16 and 30 for the last year and just made the change recently....best thing I have ever done! I absolutely hate changing lens and noticed that held me from shooting!
    18-105: one lens for everything!

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад +1

      Zoom lens over prime lens :)
      Have you tried the Tamron 17-70mm? It’s another great zoom lens.

  • @Bo_Hazem
    @Bo_Hazem 2 года назад +8

    I would only buy this one or the PZ 18-200mm lens for parallax effect. The steady zoom is consistent and the zoom range is great for amplifying the parallax effect with Sony a7iv in crop mode.

  • @romvil
    @romvil 4 года назад +3

    Thanks for the post. Well articulated points.
    I have both the Sony a6400 and the SELP18105 lens as well. From a build quality standpoint, no question this is solid. The "disadvantage" as with many lenses of this size is its footprint - it's like holding a can of soda and it weighs just as heavy (actually heavier).
    I would agree this is a good all-around lens and a good solution if you want to use/carry only one lens. I agree with all the 5 reasons you stated.
    But of course, no lens is perfect. There are at least two "annoyances" at the top of my list:
    1. The minimum focusing distance. I know this is not a macro lens but this lens' minimum focusing distance makes it challenging for some use cases. Luckily those are few and far between.
    2. The images and video footage could be "soft" at times. Granted, I'd still say what I can capture with this lens is generally better than the pancake kit lens.
    Gotta take the good with the bad, right?
    Question for you - do you use the Clear Image Zoom feature of the a6400? With it and this lens, that pretty much gives you double the reach - up to 210mm! To the naked eye, it seems the algorithm used with this feature has no noticeable degradation in image quality. If you do use it, please let me know what you think.
    Cheers.

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  4 года назад +1

      Thanks, man!!!
      Thanks for pointing out the “annoyances” too. Well noted. But yeah, gotta take the good with the bad.
      I haven’t actually tried using the Clear Image Zoom. Will do that and see if it’s worth reviewing. Nonetheless, thanks for the tip! Appreciate it.

  • @bohemian0307
    @bohemian0307 Год назад +1

    I have newly purchased Sony @6400
    What will be the best lens for photography ? Please suggest

  • @pearlpill
    @pearlpill Год назад

    Hi! Great review! Will it be good for makeup and beauty videos?

  • @arnoldpodcast3614
    @arnoldpodcast3614 3 года назад +1

    I've been using this lens for 1 year and it's so versatile. Great video. Greeting from the UK 🇬🇧

  • @RockWILK
    @RockWILK 3 года назад +1

    I had to come back here and watch this again. Lately I've been feeling like I can do so much with just two lenses... my Samyang 12mm f2.0 and my Sony 35mm F1.8. I'm shooting a documentary now, and so far, those two lenses have been it, and I haven't felt like I need anything else at all. They both work great on my Crane M2, so that's a big plus for me as well, and I think that, for filmmaking, I don't really need much more, but.... for more flexibility, and for having fun, and for just running around, and maybe if I shot weddings, or events like that, THEN maybe this, or the Tamron 17-70 would be an absolute necessity. One of them... Of course, when I'm just running around having fun, I just use my 16-50 kit lens, and it looks good to me, but I know those other two zooms are so much better and more flexible... Hmm... #LensConversations lol

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад +1

      Hahahaha I get you, brother. It’s an endless desire of lenses. 😂

    • @RockWILK
      @RockWILK 3 года назад

      @@DanboxingPH I had an epiphany. I'm about to post a video about this exact subject. Watch for it over the next few days. :-) keep up the awesome work, I love coming to your Channel

  • @Chang_Media
    @Chang_Media Год назад

    Ive noticed focus pulsing on my sony a6400 when in AF-C mode across various lens -esp once they are on F4 and above --> is this an issue and is there a solve?

  • @LiamHighDefinition
    @LiamHighDefinition 4 года назад +1

    Great review. Just bought this lens, now I'm excited.

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  4 года назад

      Thank you! Excited for you too 📸💯

  • @xtrynottoblinkx
    @xtrynottoblinkx 4 года назад +1

    Great review, did some research and today 12/25/20 I purchased the a6400 paired with the 18-105mm f4.

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  4 года назад +1

      Hey, man. Thanks a lot.
      Excited for you. Great buy! 💯

  • @sukisan84
    @sukisan84 Год назад

    What are disadvantages of this lens?
    And, because I would like to have a bit more zoom, would you recommend Sony SELP 18-200 PZ or because of the better quality and aperture F4, rather stay on Sony SELP 18-105? (Currently using A6100 + Tamron 18-300 - missing power zoom and some quality)

  • @gabrielto4990
    @gabrielto4990 2 года назад +1

    Sony 18-105mm or sigma 18-50mm 2.8? what would you recommend?

  • @TenzDelek
    @TenzDelek Год назад

    just did some research on the lens for the a6000 series, I would probably suggest tamron 17-70mm if your bugget is slightly up. or the sigma 18-50mm but it has no oss. the 18-105mm has many review that it is an average lens and the image quality is not that sharp. hope its helps.

  • @KaDagosAnglerPH
    @KaDagosAnglerPH 2 года назад

    How about the new sigma 18-50mm compare to this lens,.. wich one will you choose?,..

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  2 года назад

      I’d choose this over the Sigma. Wider focal range and with stabilization.

  • @konstv6388
    @konstv6388 8 месяцев назад

    I do RUclips vlog, interview and party video shoot.. will a6400 better than zve10 in terms of video? Please help😊

  • @ConstantineSPhotography
    @ConstantineSPhotography 3 года назад +1

    Just looking for some inspirations on youtube and found this video. I have Sony 18-105 too and I agree with you. By the way, I really like how you edit your photos. Very stylish! Thanks for sharing!

  • @myronshneider
    @myronshneider 3 года назад

    Just had to slow your video to .25 speed and rewatch that intro 5 times. Good job mate!

  • @kevmondoux
    @kevmondoux 3 года назад

    I just starting out. I bought the A6400 with kit lens. I'm wondering if I should still buy this or go with Sony 85 mm and also the Sony 50mm/56 mm instead. Still learning the camera. Thank you.

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад +1

      Hey, man.
      Made a video about the top 5 lenses I do recommend for Sony APS-C users -
      ruclips.net/video/gESxjJy4i10/видео.html

  • @muhammadfaheem8911
    @muhammadfaheem8911 2 года назад

    I'm currently looking to buy either the Sony 18-105 or 18-135. Which one would you recommend me to buying?

  • @jhomervaliente9617
    @jhomervaliente9617 2 года назад

    Can i still get decent footage with 18-105 for an event like birthday or wedding especially in receptions and depending only to the dj's lights?

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  2 года назад

      Yes. But you would have to crank up your ISO. But should be fine.

  • @CRJmmfSKZ
    @CRJmmfSKZ 3 года назад

    I have this lens (probably over year) and would like to know what’s your opinion on a new lens to pair it with? Street photography is my niche.

    • @CRJmmfSKZ
      @CRJmmfSKZ 3 года назад

      Also, I’m shooting with a A7RII

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад

      You’d probably need to invest on full frame lens if you’re using a full frame camera.
      I think the Sigma 28-70 will be a great option ruclips.net/video/Nf_hYGN6tmQ/видео.html

  • @DavinciHD_
    @DavinciHD_ 3 года назад

    With the aps-c crop factor of the 18-105mm lens being equivalent to 157mm . Would this lens be good enough to film football from the sideline ?

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад

      Hey, man. This might be too short even on an APS-C body. You might want to look at lenses with longer focal lengths. I’ll be releasing a video about the Tamron 150-500. You might want to consider that instead.

  • @zarihanraduan
    @zarihanraduan 2 года назад

    HEY HELLO SIR.. MY TARGET.... BUT RIGHT NOW IM USING 16MM SIGMA...UNFORTUNETLY .. IM TRYING TO SHOOT CAR FOOTAGE AND ALSO PROTOCOL EVENT. WHEN PROTOCOL EVENT I MUST STAY FAR FROM SUBJECT.. THIS LENS RECOMMANDED ? OR USING 17 70 OR 18 50MM ? CAN U GIVE BEST FEEDBACK.. I AM DILEMMA TO CHOOSE WHICH MODEL TO REPLACE MY SIGMA 16MM :(

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  2 года назад

      Go for the Tamron 17-70. It’s a way better lens overall. Plus it’s sharper :)

  • @TexpatOTG
    @TexpatOTG 3 года назад

    There is so much to shoot in Philippines, the 18-105mm seems like a great lens to just leave on a body ... gimbal, tripod or handheld, no problem.

  • @justsaying3176
    @justsaying3176 Год назад

    bro im thinking to get this with my sigma 16mm 1.4 will this be a good combo for travel vids / vlog contents? let me know bro

  • @PaulVensonsRch
    @PaulVensonsRch Год назад

    Awesome review bro! Thanks for this! Have tried this using my ZV-E10! So awesome! Will get this one soon!

  • @ClarkVistan
    @ClarkVistan Год назад

    Very nice review! Thanks, man! I just bought the same lens. You just reached 1k like! 👌

  • @justsaying3176
    @justsaying3176 Год назад

    bro mas ok ba ito sa sony 85mm 1.8? kung i papartner ko sa sigma 16mm 1.4 para sa travel videos photography wedding etc

  • @tenzinpelsang5637
    @tenzinpelsang5637 3 года назад

    Can you do the comparison between 18-105 vs tamron 17-70

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад

      I already did. Here’s the link - ruclips.net/video/Lp71c24Gd7c/видео.html
      Enjoy 🔥😊

  • @jorgecontardo4347
    @jorgecontardo4347 2 года назад

    I use this lens with my sony a6400 for video and it looks good, but for photography the quality is not very good compared to other lenses and I don't know why
    Do I have to configure it in any specific way?

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  2 года назад

      I don’t really know. When I was using it, I didn’t have any configuration except that I shot RAW. Then all the adjustments, I do in post.

  • @itzmack4518
    @itzmack4518 4 года назад

    how you get your videos tp look like that ? do you use any luts if not can you plx tell me how

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  4 года назад

      No luts yet. I just mix and match in LumaFusion hahha I’ll try to make a video if ever :)

  • @asitpurohit_108
    @asitpurohit_108 3 года назад

    Is it good for cinematic video as well as short film

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад

      I personally think so, yes :) wide range of focal length plus stabilization 🔥

  • @tomashkoziol
    @tomashkoziol Год назад

    Bought one month ago for my A6000, since than is non stop on. 35 1.4 and 85 1.8 resting atm.

  • @haveygonzalez7946
    @haveygonzalez7946 4 года назад

    Solid Review! Need gimbal unboxing for next video!

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  4 года назад

      Thank you, brother! Yup, will try to do one about gimbals as well :)

  • @irenesanjay
    @irenesanjay Год назад

    can this be used for streaming on Sony ZV E10

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  Год назад

      YES

    • @irenesanjay
      @irenesanjay Год назад

      @DanboxingPH I am going to use the 15-105mm lens indoor so wanted to check how good they are in low light and if they get over heated in 2 hours

  • @roycerenzogaleos9977
    @roycerenzogaleos9977 4 года назад

    Glad I found this. I was trying to get the 55-210 but I was hesitant due to its built and image quality.

    • @whit3fox
      @whit3fox 4 года назад

      try get 70-350mm for telephoto ^^

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  4 года назад

      Would love to try that as well!

  • @abhisheksonivlog2526
    @abhisheksonivlog2526 3 года назад +1

    I have a problem of focus... focus jumping whenever i shoot videos

  • @theamador24
    @theamador24 2 года назад

    Hello! From Honduras, is it good for sports?

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  2 года назад

      Yes! Especially if there’s a decent amount of light

    • @theamador24
      @theamador24 2 года назад

      @@DanboxingPH thank you so much

  • @Jgheiler
    @Jgheiler 3 года назад

    How about this one compared to the sigma 18-50 mm f2.8?

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад

      Given the chance, why not. Stay tuned!

  • @rboszu
    @rboszu 4 года назад

    Perfect review bro. Was thinking of buying this lens

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  4 года назад

      Thanks, bro!
      If you are interested in buying this lens, maybe you want to take a look first at the Tamron 17-70. More expensive but more powerful ruclips.net/video/eBJ8rep8TVY/видео.html

  • @ChrisJon97
    @ChrisJon97 3 года назад

    Hello, do you personally recommend owning Sony's 70-200mm F/4 G OSS after owning the 18-105mm?

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад +1

      I haven’t really tried the 70-200mm but for a more normal versatile experience, 18-105mm is the way to go. It has also OSS.

    • @eusouthaypelomundo
      @eusouthaypelomundo 3 года назад

      70-200mm is prob overkill if you're not doing any sport/nature/commercial work....

  • @Ezranghero
    @Ezranghero Год назад

    kaya ba sa light trail?

  • @ΚΩΣΤΑΣΚΟΣΜΑΔΑΚΗΣ-ω3χ

    Hello! very good lens presentation! I have the same lens Sony 18-105mm F4 and the 6400. in autofocus I have the same problem that I noticed in your video. the backround flickers. Does anyone know how to fix this problem?
    Thanks!

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  4 года назад

      Thanks you very much! Please do watch my other videos as well. You might pick a thing or two from ‘em.
      Unfortunately, up until this moment, I still don’t have a solution for that. I also don’t think there’s a firmware update that fixes that. :(

  • @Gorganahfikark
    @Gorganahfikark 3 года назад

    Dan this is a great video. I just subscribed to your channel. I am new to photography and the Sony a6400. I would like one zoom lens for daylight street photography and occasional landscape adventures. Would the 18-105 do the trick? I have 2 primes sigma 16 f1.4 and a Sony 50mm, I dont like having to change lens all the time when photo walking. Must also be light weight. Happy if anyone has some suggestions for this use case for the Sony a6400

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад

      Hey, Andre! Thank you!
      You might want to check the Tamron 17-70 as well.
      I made a comparison video for folks like you - ruclips.net/video/Lp71c24Gd7c/видео.html
      Hope it helps!

  • @sicstudioproduction7963
    @sicstudioproduction7963 4 года назад +5

    Great video, really professional and explicatory
    Does the lens have any black vignette when using it in photo or video mode? Especially with the A6400

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  4 года назад +2

      Thank you!
      Based on my experience, no vignetting when using the lens with the A6400. 💯

  • @putryyy6077
    @putryyy6077 2 года назад

    I've had this lens for 2 months and realized everytime i zoom out with the power zoom to 18mm the zoom ring stops working even after i restart the camera. It'll only work normally again after i zoomed in with the power zoom. Is it supposed to do that? Or is my lens defective?

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  2 года назад

      You might want to have it checked if that’s the case. I don’t recall mine having such concern.

  • @cholobonus3503
    @cholobonus3503 3 года назад

    Just got my Sony A6400 with kit lens 16-50mm. I was thinking of getting a primary lens. Which do you recommend? Sigma 16mm or Sony 18-105mm? I am a beginner. TIA brother!

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад +1

      Hi, Cholo.
      I wanted to ask for what purpose exactly but as I think thru your “primary lens”, I’d clearly recommend the 18-105.
      You get to have a wide (maybe not so, but pretty much useful enough) and telephoto in one. That focal range is gold.
      Also, stabilized lens is like a must for A6400 especially if you don’t have a gimbal.
      Only downside is its lowlight performance. Other than that, for “primary lens” a wide range range of focal length is an advantage.

    • @cholobonus3503
      @cholobonus3503 3 года назад

      For IG (OOTD, portrait and street photography)
      Is Sigma good in lowlight?
      Thank you@@DanboxingPH Appreciate it so much!

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад +1

      If you’re not doing much videography then, choose the Sigma. Very good in low light. Check out 30mm as well. That might do you better. Not too wide, not too tight. I also have a video about it, you can check it out. Hope it helps!

    • @cholobonus3503
      @cholobonus3503 3 года назад

      Oh yes. I’ve seen that already. Sigma 30mm looks good too also way cheaper!

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад

      Yes yes. :)

  • @jrmayol857
    @jrmayol857 4 года назад

    Great content and very well explained. Where did you ordered this lens? Thanks!

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  4 года назад

      Thanks, man!
      Got it from a local distributor here in the Philippines, it’s caller Gadget Master.

  • @marlontan3904
    @marlontan3904 7 месяцев назад

    planning to buy this combo

  • @CarlesSpriggs
    @CarlesSpriggs 3 года назад

    I’m interested in this Lens, would you recommend this over this sigma 16?
    I’m a comedian and I need a lens to film my comedy shows.

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад +1

      Hi, Carles.
      It really depends. But clearly, I would NOT recommend this if you’re doing a lot of LOW LIGHT SHOWS. F4 is a problem in low light situations.
      Here’s my review of the 16 tho ruclips.net/video/k0Acuw2pRKA/видео.html

    • @CarlesSpriggs
      @CarlesSpriggs 3 года назад

      @@DanboxingPH thanks for your advice,
      I really appreciate it!

  • @fredricolord876
    @fredricolord876 3 года назад

    Great review!!! I have a sigma 30mm prime and wanted a telephoto with some versatility and this seems to be it for my budget!!

  • @NA15916
    @NA15916 3 года назад

    It's hard to decide hahaha. I was considering 35mm f1.8 and 18-105mm f4 lens. Any suggestions pls ?

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад

      Go get the Sony 35mm plus Tamron 17-70 hahaha

  • @makitv8221
    @makitv8221 11 месяцев назад

    So if you have this lense, do you still recommend to buy a 50mm lense?

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  10 месяцев назад

      Yes. Because it’s a totally different lens and is good for lowlight and portraits.

  • @buddyvilla6889
    @buddyvilla6889 3 года назад

    Wow!!! Thank you for this. Great review!!!
    I subscribed to your channel!!!

  • @DavidDavies
    @DavidDavies 4 года назад

    Hi Dan, great video, you did a great job. I am actually making a video on this lens tomorrow so it was great to see your video. You are doing a great job on camera. I just subscribed. Good luck to your channel.

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  4 года назад +1

      Hey, Dave!
      Thank you very much! Please do watch my other videos as well. 💯
      Excited to see your video too! 👌🏽

  • @shyjucabraham91
    @shyjucabraham91 3 года назад

    I have a6400 and this lens. Idk why mine is not sharp. Eyes are soft. Idk if it's the lens issue or a setting that needs to be changed. Please help.

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад +1

      Hey, man. It really is not as sharp as, say Sigma lenses. I don’t think there’s an issue in your settings or something. Hence, I suggest you spend time in post processing to enhance it a bit :)

    • @shyjucabraham91
      @shyjucabraham91 3 года назад

      @@DanboxingPH thank you

    • @guystokes454
      @guystokes454 3 года назад +1

      Yeah, it's not the sharpest lens out there. You might want to check the firmware version you have as well just in case. Good luck.

    • @shyjucabraham91
      @shyjucabraham91 3 года назад

      @@guystokes454 I got rid of it. I think i should go with the Tamron 17-70 f2.8. But RUclips reviews says its not the sharpest either. Sonys one doesn't have IBIS. 😥

  • @aaronza7218
    @aaronza7218 4 года назад

    Great content. I think you forgot to mention that zooming speed can be managed using the switch.

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  4 года назад

      Oh yeah! Forgot about that. Thank you!

  • @billionbites
    @billionbites 3 года назад

    just got this lens, going to pair it with a pro mist filter.

  • @jeremytanmagic
    @jeremytanmagic 3 года назад

    Great video! I use this (18-105) and the sigma 16mm f1.4. Buy it! You won’t regret it! Hehe.

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад

      Thank you 💯

    • @jeremytanmagic
      @jeremytanmagic 3 года назад

      @@DanboxingPH you’re welcomed, I came over from a Sony fb page! 😄

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад

      Woaaaah! Thanks for noticing 💯💯💯

  • @LaVidaMedia
    @LaVidaMedia 4 года назад

    VEry cool! Great video quality! I am interested in this lens :)

  • @-xikoahok154
    @-xikoahok154 3 года назад

    Can i connect to sony a6400?

  • @TheBigFishEnergy
    @TheBigFishEnergy 3 года назад

    Great video brother.

  • @wtfgadget
    @wtfgadget 4 года назад

    better this one or the 18-135mm for photo only ?

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  4 года назад

      For photo only, I’d go for the 18-135mm.
      1. Longer focal length
      2. Higher F-stop

    • @wtfgadget
      @wtfgadget 4 года назад

      @@DanboxingPH is higher F-stop a good thing ? I think it more sucks for low light

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  4 года назад

      Sorry, I meant larger aperture. F3.5 over F4. 😊

    • @wtfgadget
      @wtfgadget 4 года назад

      @@DanboxingPH I see thank you for the information my friend

  • @rohitprince2328
    @rohitprince2328 3 года назад

    Plz please upload video comperd to tow aps-c lens temron 17-70f2.8 vs g-oss Sony 18-105f4mm

    • @rohitprince2328
      @rohitprince2328 3 года назад

      I'm confused tow lens for wedding videographer purpose who is best

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад +1

      Hello! I also have a video reviewing the Tamron 17-70. Here’s the link ruclips.net/video/eBJ8rep8TVY/видео.html
      In my opinion, I’d go for the Tamron due to the bigger aperture. :)

  • @piwagerica7365
    @piwagerica7365 3 года назад

    Wooh! Naguguluhan na ako sa bibilhin ko dahil sa review mo sir. Hahaha Btw, sir may tutorial ka ng color grading dito sa mga clips mo dito?

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад

      Hahaha in that case, this might help you, bro - ruclips.net/video/gESxjJy4i10/видео.html (Top Lenses for Sony APS-C cameras).
      I haven’t released my color grading tutorial yet. Maybe soon. Stay tuned :)

  • @johnjo8024
    @johnjo8024 Год назад

    Love your videos bro, but could you please brighten up your overall video? I'm sure that this is your style and you are intentional about it, but it seems a bit dark. Thanks.

  • @ifwatsyahir6686
    @ifwatsyahir6686 3 года назад

    Sir, is this lens good for food product videography and food photography?

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад +1

      Good for everything with a decent lightin setup :)

    • @ifwatsyahir6686
      @ifwatsyahir6686 3 года назад

      @@DanboxingPH Okay thanks! From ur opinion & experience, which one is better? Between 18-105mm or sigma 16mm f1.4 / sigma 30mm f1.4? Do u have video comparing between these lens?

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад +1

      To be honest, I got rid of the 18-105 when Tamron released the 17-70. That is the better choice overall. You might want to check that out.
      And since the Sigma Trio is also something else, I compared it to the Tamron 17-70.
      ruclips.net/video/gpSOcSQmx0M/видео.html

    • @ifwatsyahir6686
      @ifwatsyahir6686 3 года назад

      @@DanboxingPH okay thanks for the honest suggestion! Im planning on buying zv-e10 and still considering which lens to go on. Also wondering whether the kitlens 16-50mm is good for a start? Can do beautiful cinematic/like commercial food shoot etc?

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад +1

      I never tried the 16-50. Hahaha can’t speak much about it.
      But in my opinion, if you’re really looking at a particular lens, save up for it. Don’t settle for anything less. It will cost you more :)

  • @infinity007-k5k
    @infinity007-k5k 3 года назад

    can u make a tutorial video for your colour grading skills

  • @jirusalmario9686
    @jirusalmario9686 3 года назад +1

    Great video and nice channel! Keep safe there in Phillipines! peace from Italy

  • @abhisheksonivlog2526
    @abhisheksonivlog2526 3 года назад

    Amazing ❤️ Have you used presets in your photos?

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад +1

      Yes. A preset I just made in Lightroom.

    • @abhisheksonivlog2526
      @abhisheksonivlog2526 3 года назад

      @@DanboxingPH Thanks for response bro. ❤️ And..can u shr plz.

  • @rajeshshankula5600
    @rajeshshankula5600 4 года назад

    Omgg these shots on a6400 only?? Or with some filters ?? Plzz tell me bro

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  4 года назад

      Yes! Post processed in Lightroom (photo) and LumaFusion (video). Will try to make a video showing I do color grading and stuff :)

    • @rajeshshankula5600
      @rajeshshankula5600 4 года назад

      @@DanboxingPH ohh okk bro ..thank you

  • @bshzhgaga3355
    @bshzhgaga3355 3 года назад

    This or 30mm sigma for all use?

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад

      For all use, Sony 18-105. 👌🏽

  • @rpmngstudiosbyrolandprudencio
    @rpmngstudiosbyrolandprudencio 2 года назад +1

    whatzuuupp! yes this lens is an all rounder, im an Event videographer here in Rome Italy and ive been using this lens on my A7riii, a6500 and a6400 for how many years! Highly reco guys!

  • @DSJAGAT28
    @DSJAGAT28 3 года назад

    But now available Tamron 17-70 2.8 which one buy

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад

      I made a video comparing the two - ruclips.net/video/Lp71c24Gd7c/видео.html

  • @burt5057
    @burt5057 4 года назад

    I have a Sony SELP 18-105 G lens. Lately when I shake it I hear a rattling sound from inside the lens. This happens whether the lens is on or off the camera. I have not dropped it, or to my knowledge knocked it against anything.
    Can anyone shed any light on why this is happening?
    Many Thanks.
    Roger.

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  4 года назад +1

      Oh man, sadly no idea about that. I no longer have my 18-105 to double check. But with my current Tamron 17-70, it also has that rattling sound inside. In my research, people say that it’s because of the VC. The in-lens stabilization. So, maybe, the same goes for the 18-105 since it has in-lens stabilization too?

  • @ibrahimmohammed2340
    @ibrahimmohammed2340 3 года назад

    Bro do you live in the US or canada?

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад +1

      I live in the Philippines hahaha

    • @ibrahimmohammed2340
      @ibrahimmohammed2340 3 года назад

      @@DanboxingPH my bad!😅 Actually i wanted to ask that you displayed a photo of the sigma 16mm f1.4 and it was priced at 419$ so is it usd or cad?

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад

      No worries, man! Hahaha
      It’s USD :)

  • @GaneswaranBalakrishna
    @GaneswaranBalakrishna 3 года назад

    Sir would you choose 18-200mm or 18-105mm.which one would be good choice ?Please help me sir 😫

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад

      18-105 anytime of the day! Larger aperture, constant aperture at all focal lengths, etc.
      If I ever need such longer focal range, I’d buy a more decent telephoto lens :)

  • @keystonebrotherb
    @keystonebrotherb 4 года назад +1

    I’ve loved this lens. I have named it Excalibur. Upon delivery of the new Tamron 17-70 2.8 w/VC, I’ll sell my 18-105. I can’t see ever using this again with that in my bag. With the Sigma 100-400 DG DN OS, I’ll just take two lenses for most outings.

    • @abdulmoiz6256
      @abdulmoiz6256 4 года назад

      Do you that one would miss the 105 focal length when shifting to the Tamron 17-70mm?

    • @keystonebrotherb
      @keystonebrotherb 4 года назад

      @@abdulmoiz6256
      You can always crop in with 24mp and the sharpness of this lens. I couldn’t always do that with my 18-105.

  • @BenConley
    @BenConley 3 года назад

    Great review thank you!!

  • @jayllicampo97
    @jayllicampo97 2 года назад

    thank you so much for sharing this video bro! God bless you! 🔥👍🏻😊

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  2 года назад

      Welcome, Jaylli!
      Thanks for watching!

  • @Suthan_Pamenan
    @Suthan_Pamenan 2 года назад

    Hallo from indoensian Thank for review . I Like Your videos❤

  • @intellectborn23
    @intellectborn23 2 года назад

    I've been using this lens and it's very robust and useful. Other than the weight I don't have an issue with it.
    The constant aperture is sufficient. Great video. Thanks for sharing.

  • @caitlinhowell3499
    @caitlinhowell3499 4 года назад

    awesome vid!

  • @_Hobitoys
    @_Hobitoys 4 года назад

    Solid ng review neto. Sir ok kaya to sa a6000?

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  4 года назад +1

      Thank you! I haven’t tried but I feel like it’s going to work well too with the A6000.

    • @WTFitsJoshu
      @WTFitsJoshu 4 года назад +1

      @hobitoysTV Ofcourse! If you want to see a6000 + 18-105mm G lens. Check my instagram wtfitsjoshu 😄

  • @MusMus-bg1fg
    @MusMus-bg1fg 8 месяцев назад

    Did anyone used this lens for photos

  • @creativejuicewithoutpulp
    @creativejuicewithoutpulp 4 года назад

    Thank you! I will be buying one :D

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  4 года назад

      I’m super excited for you!!!!! 💯

  • @mr.blurred143
    @mr.blurred143 3 года назад

    Hello sir. the arthur R of the Philippines. pa review naman ng sigma 2.8 18-50 dc dn. thanks Godbless

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад +1

      Wow! Super good to hear that! Thank you very much.
      Regarding the new Sigma, if given the chance, yeah, why not. I would love to review that. Stay tuned!

  • @samv1920
    @samv1920 2 года назад

    Parang mabbudol ako ah 😭 what about 18-135mm lens?

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  2 года назад

      Go go go!
      Never ko na try yang 18-135 e. Fan ako ng constant aperture. Hehe

    • @samv1920
      @samv1920 2 года назад

      @@DanboxingPH me too!!!! It's just so expensive. Is this a great lens for both photo & video?

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  2 года назад

      YES for both photo and video!

  • @tobatus
    @tobatus 3 года назад

    nice Information

  • @dejamonaamamona8233
    @dejamonaamamona8233 4 года назад

    I think tamrons new 17-70mm 2.8 made sonys 18-105 obsolete. Price is similar (650 sonys- tammys 800usd) Performance of this new lens is comparable to sonys 16-55mm 2.8 ... but that one costs 1400usd

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  4 года назад +1

      Was able to use the new Tamron yesterday! Will make a video for my thoughts about it :)

    • @dejamonaamamona8233
      @dejamonaamamona8233 4 года назад

      @@DanboxingPH sweet!

    • @abdulmoiz6256
      @abdulmoiz6256 4 года назад +2

      Yes but the range on the sony......

  • @navivillanueva9628
    @navivillanueva9628 3 года назад

    Bai mo palit ko ani ugma gamiton nako pang video ok ra ba ni hulat ko imong tip salamat

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад +1

      Sorry, di kita masyado maintindihan. Tagalog sana :)

    • @navivillanueva9628
      @navivillanueva9628 3 года назад

      @@DanboxingPH ai sorry bro gusto ko lang humingi ng tip if ok ba ito pang all around na lens salamat lods

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад +1

      @@navivillanueva9628 ayun! Ah oo naman! Okay na okay ito. Both for photography and videography. Only downside in my opinion is the f4 max aperture. Not so good in lowlight. 👌🏽
      Other than that, sobrang okay nito.

    • @navivillanueva9628
      @navivillanueva9628 3 года назад

      @@DanboxingPH salamat sa tip bro! Ill go get this lens today.

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад

      Enjoy!!! 🔥

  • @naingaunglwin9717
    @naingaunglwin9717 3 года назад

    thank you

  • @zakey9662
    @zakey9662 3 года назад

    Thanks bro

  • @NatureRelax4K
    @NatureRelax4K 4 года назад

    Awesome review !

  • @nelramos000
    @nelramos000 4 года назад

    For general purposes this is enough, bokeh is overrated and f4 is good enough. Nice review

  • @RGFX32
    @RGFX32 3 года назад

    salamat broski subscribed

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 года назад

      Salamat ng madami 💯🔥👌🏽

  • @jomarcanales
    @jomarcanales 3 года назад

    Yupppp

  • @srochnovyzov
    @srochnovyzov 8 месяцев назад

    Choatic autofocus, very random. When you zoom on girl - focus is breathing. Look as smartphone picture.

  • @indiemaxxkreative251
    @indiemaxxkreative251 4 года назад

    sub ✔ 😊 thoughts on upcoming tamron 17 70 2.8

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  4 года назад +2

      Thank you! Appreciate it.
      Looking forward to get my hands on that particular lens too. Stay tuned 💯😊

    • @keystonebrotherb
      @keystonebrotherb 4 года назад +2

      I’ve pre-ordered the 17-70.
      Rumor it ships 1/14/21.
      Game changer.

    • @TZR95035
      @TZR95035 4 года назад

      I am pre ordering the tamron tonight this will complete my glass collection for my 6400

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  4 года назад

      Super excited about this too!

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  4 года назад

      Happy for you! 💯👌🏽

  • @Lofote
    @Lofote 4 года назад +2

    It's not a general must-have for the camera. The camera is actually not the specific thing that decides whether this is a good lens for you. For that decision only WHAT and HOW you shoot is important. For example I only do portraits. This lens is useless for me. For many others as well.
    Oh and you did not speak about image quality, seems that the build quality is more important for you, which I find strange. powerzoom for me is absolutely rather a minus feature, I'd rather like mechanical zoom.