Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Tamron 17-70mm f2.8 for Sony USER EXPERIENCE REVIEW! | a6600 a6400 a6100 a6000
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 авг 2024
- Buy Lens - Amazon geni.us/O16acP | BH bhpho.to/2MUvjhN
This video is brought to you by SQUARESPACE! Visit www.squarespace... to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain.
a6600
Amazon geni.us/8R5gC | BH geni.us/mg31i
a6400
Amazon geni.us/DFl7Pc | BH geni.us/yV33tVG
16-55mm G
Amazon geni.us/UuV1Q4W | BH geni.us/PtdDDt6
DJI RS2 Gimbal
Amazon geni.us/SZq0Qw | BH geni.us/dOOPrv
Chapters
00:00 Intro
01:55 Image Quality
02:50 Bokeh
03:22 Close Focusing
03:50 Form Factor
05:36 Lens Stabilization
06:56 AutoFocus
08:39 VLOGGING
09:24 Price - Is it WORTH it?
13:26 Final Thoughts
14:00 Sponsor
Music from Artlist.io | Get 2 EXTRA Month Free 👇
geni.us/04BA5R
Sooooo... APS-C is Not Dead...? 😆
Oh it’s dead. Tamron just didn’t get the memo about the upcoming a7c
I hope not. I upgraded my a6000 just a little over a year ago to the a6400. And I never get to use it right now.
Yes, this lens will make my a6000 more useful !!! Thanks for your review
It is. The Tamron is just it's gravestone.
Just kidding. Hope for an a6600 with better evf and flippy screen plus SIII color science. That would be dope
Not YET
I watched almost all the latest reviews of this lens and found yours is the best so far. You covered almost everything we want to know and even the tiny jitters of the background while using this lens to take video not to mention the comparison between this lens and the Sony equivalent. Very informative and full of fun. Respect!
Thanks Jeff! Means a lot! Always striving hard to show case as much aspect of the gear as possible while maintaining the fun energy!
@@JasonVongYou're smashing it every time Jason 👌👍😉
This paired with the Sony 70-350 will be a travellers dream. All that range in 2 lenses both with 67mm filters.
Great point, that’s killer!
Got my 17 70 today so have this pair
@@paulclarke4571 dem.. great for u
I have this exact set up and just added a Samyang 12mm for my a6400. Next up Sony 200-600 for wildlife and sports.
This is great, being 2.8 it allows a crop frame camera to compete with full frame A7C +24-105 f/4 . A comparison would be interesting to see if A7C+24-105 at ISO 1600 compares to A6400+17-70 at ISO 800. I just got in December a Nikon Z5 +24-200 for travel. really happy with it (beautiful viewfinder). I have the Sony 16-55 f2.8, bit image stabilization, close focus and longer range make this an amazing lens. Travel, lifestyle assignments, portraits, fashion. Also this Tamron is better and more competitive than the Sony 16-70 f4. Also wider and more versatile than Sony A7x+ Tamron 28-200.
Best review of the Tamron 17-70mm f2.8 i’ve seen so far 😀 makes me not doubt my purchase (pre-order) of it.
enjoy it!
@@JasonVong will do. It ain’t coming til probably end of january of mid february! Hahah.
I got mine on 13. its awesome and feels really good in hand man :)
@@stefanhabbig320 great to hear!!!!! what camera do you use? I have the A6500. Mine is arriving on February 4.
edrixc i got an a6400, fits well! You will have fun and the handling will be better with ur slightly bigger grip :)
I watched this today, Oct 19, and Sigma has dropped a competitor in the mix: The Sigma 18-50mm F2.8.
Looking forward to your review of the Sigma and possibly a three way comparison with the Tamron 17-70 and Sony 16-50.
I have the sony and was about to regret it until your final comparison. Thanks for that. If I were buying now, it would be a hard decision (I do have a stabilized body a6500). That $500 difference, the VC and the 70mm long end are pretty compelling arguments. Tamron's got a winner. I'm glad that we have some good choices now. Great review!
Thanks Jason! You’re my go to guy for anything Sony related. I appreciate all the work you put in!
Dang, I want that 17-70 2.8 on my full frame
Same!
@@jeffrendered3564 why not 5.6? Lol bcs bokeh and low light maybe?
But yeah FF 2.8 would probably be huge so u would not want it either:)
17-70 f2.8 APS-C is 25.5-105 f4.2 on full frame
F2.8 is f2.8 in terms of exposure but on a full frame you'll get less nois and less Dof at F4 and one step higher ISO
YOOOO! I was just watching your GoPro 9 videos a few months back! It was incredibly helpful :D
*Brother* - is this lens applicable for full frame camera? Or which lens should buy in f.2.8 in tamron for full frame camera?
FINALLY!!!! A good range. good aperture of 2.8 PLUS VC-Stabilisation!!!
I was about to upgrade my a6400 to the a7c and this lens walks in 😁🤣
Me too
I had no intentions of upgrading yet, so finding out about this lens pushed that eventual upgrade back even further lmao.
This is great. Should give the same performance as a 24-105 on a full frame (which is usually my choice compared to the 24-70 F2.8). I still would go with full frame... I like having both aperture and shutter speed wheels.
The like and the comment is for Vivian being such a trooper and tolerating your BS!
Time to get Vivian a helmet. 😐
Loving the whole vibe of this video! It’s just so much fun to watch 😁
In India, 18-105 & 16-70 both are $300 & $200 less than Tamron 17-70 f/2.8 which is great for travel or beginner wedding photography
Great review! As a fan of zoom lenses, the range on this lens is exceptional! Definitely could be your one lens for run and gun.
so 2 years later I am just picking this up for my Sony ZV E10, it was a battle between this and the Sigma 18-50mm but I swayed towards the tamron because of the extra focal length and image stabilisation.
thanks for all your reviews, they are great...
do you think this lens still holds it's own 2years on from this video
Hello, I am between the same two lenses. How did it go with the tamron? I have zve10 too
Good for you, I sold this lens a few months ago since I bought a full-frame but planning on buying this again for my a6400, and that double-purpose use for my A7IV in crop mode.
At first when I saw the new Tamron I considered replacing my 16-55, but even tho it has better zoom range and stabilization (big deal for A6409 users) I decided to keep my Sony because of the image quality :)
yeah I think you're probably making the right choice. The 16-55 looks like an exceptional lens. I think if I had it, I wouldn't really be considering the Tamron too much either. But as someone who doesn't own either, that little bit of extra reach, VC and the much cheaper price has pretty much sold it for me. If I could get both at the same price, the Sony would probably win me over.
Great production value!
Looks like an ads show lol
So no 6500? That's racist....
I recently picked up a 6100 (silver/black version which looks very nice) over the holidays to compliment my full frame Sony bodies. I wanted to have something small and compact that I can carry with me on less demanding tasks and trips. This is a workhorse lens that fills a gap in the aps-c lineup at a good price.
I’m using my full frame lenses interchangeably but OSS is missing on many of them and no IBIS on the 6100. This is a godsend for darker environments and now on my wishlist. Thanks for the review.
I would rather it be a 16-60 f2.8 if possible. I have the lens and it always seems to be not quit wide enough. A true 24mm ff width seems to be a sweet spot for me.
Got the sony 16-55 2.8, size is just perfect for the a6500, image is really awesome in all range, didnt try tamron but i always search the most minimalism size to travel and the sony one its not as big as tamron. I just use these lens right now, didnt miss other range. If you have the a6500 or a6600 go for the sony one, you dont need ibis on the lens.
Can Tamron 17-70mm F2.8 give the same result as 3 separate lenses SIGMA 16mm 1.4 / SIGMA 30mm 1.4 / SIGMA 56mm 1.4? I want to use it for portraits
Well the Tamron is not as sharp as those prime lenses, but in my opinion absolutely sharp enough. And you have less aperture, so that makes a difference for the bokeh/blurriness. But other than the Sigma lenses you have image stabilisation, wich is nice and you do not have to change the lens every now and then, wich is the biggest advantage of a zoom lens of course. You need to decide, if you really need the very crisp sharpness of the Sigma trio and the aperture of f1.4, or if being versatile without having to carry three lenses around with you is more important. But to answer your question straight: No, you won't get the exact same results. Less aperture and a little bit less sharpness is the price for that versatility.
How do you think this compares against the 18-105 f4 G and the Zeiss 16-70 F4?
I cant decide which one to get as well.
this is better imo. better low light and lower apeture.
I've owned all three. The 18-105 was crap. The 16-70 is very good. But the Tamron 17-70 was is the bomb. You can't beat f2.8 and it is sharper than the 16-70. The only thing I sometimes miss is the 1mm wider focal for the occasional landscape shot but usually I can just back up! 😊
I was looking for your review on this Lens. Cool effect of blue arrows! Thank you for creating this video Jason!
thanks for watching!
I've moved on from APSC to FF, but if I'm still using an APSC, the Tammy is a no brainer. You won't notice the IQ difference from the Sony F2.8 unless you're doing it side by side. And everything is easily correctable in post. The value you get from the Tammy easily makes it the best lens for Sony APSC. The larger size will be an adjustment but I think it's adaptable as this could be the lens on your camera 90% of the time. I have good experience with the Tammy FF, so I'm confident this is another good one from Tammy.
Poor Viv glad she is OK. And this is what I have been waiting on from the great Vong
I just bought this lens for my A6400 and can't wait to start shooting video and close up photos! For the price this lens is a beast. I own 2 tamron lenses 1 for sony and 1 for canon and they are amazing for the price. In all honesty the quality is really good and so far no client of mine has had any complaints about their photos. Tamron is a great company with some great prices for the quality of both image and lens. I definitely recommend their products to beginners and pros.
I’ve been waiting for you to review this lens! Awesome review vid and I cannot wait to get it for my 6600! 😄
thanks for waiting and watching :D
if you're moving to full frame sometime in the future, wouldn't it be best to get the tamron 28-75 2.8 instead? I mean you can still use it on aps-c and you have the advantage of not needing to get another lens when you upgrade the body.
The problem is the crop factor. The 28-76mm would work close to 43-115mm on an apsc camera. This lack of wide-angle range can be ok for portraits if you have space to work. However a problem for other situations like landscape, street, events, etc. So is like to put a lot of money in a more versatile lens that will not be versatile in the camera you have on hands.
Also, lenses hold value. You wouldn’t lose much money if you kept this for a few years & then wanted to upgrade (considering you keep it in good condition etc). Can always sell it when the time comes.
It's interesting to hear how several people have been tripped up with the focus ring and zoom ring between this Tamron and the Sony 16-55G lens when Sony's very own 70-350G lens has the Zoom ring on the outside and the focus ring on the inside like this Tamron.
I use the Sony 70-350G lens quite a bit and its Zoom and Focus rings are identical to this Tamron lens which is great news for me, because I get tripped up going from it to the Sony's 55-210 lens which seems to be similar to the 16-55G.
Watching this video is kind of robbing my wallet 😆 but thank you for the review, will get this lens soon, (soon, soon, soon)
Same here.
yeah, soon!
I've been looking forward to your review! So excited to get this lens for my 6100.
This lens has a full frame equivalent of 25.5 - 105 reach because of the 1.5 apsc crop. Great video.
Hello channel owner, I have watched a few videos on your channel to refer to the lens after watching, I am wondering between the 18-50mm sigma f2.8 lens and between the tamron 17-70 f 2.8. My need is to have a versatile lens that is more about shooting and shooting at a good level. Can the channel owner give me some advice? Thank you.!
can you do a comparison between this and the king of aps-c lens the sony 18-105?
I was on the fence about buying this lens but you made it such an obvious choice to buy it, thank you
It looks awesome! The question is tamron 17-70 or sony g 18-105 ?
No question, Tamron for the win. I owned the 18-105 and was disappointed. Not sharp.
Bought this lens to pair with my 6400. Good review!
i have 6400 + tamron 17-70mm - Ronin SC can handle this set ???
Thank you for this! Will definitely get the Tamron lens now.
Happy to help!
Thanks mate, great video. I was just in search for a comparison and I love your videos about the right settings for the Alphas as well.
This is especially great for someone new to this eco system (I was using a Canon EOS 600D with a Tamron 18-70 f2,8 and a Sigma 70-200 f2,8)
Unfortunately, it seems that the most of the E-Mount lenses are not providing this great arperture, therefore I'm very intersted in these two glasses
A6500 + Tamron 17-70mm f2.8 or A7c + Sigma sigma 28-70 f2.8?
My favorite lens is my Tamron 28-75/2.8 on my Nikon D80. Used it for portrait and food shoots.
I'm tempted to switch to Sony just for the 17-70/2.8. Just waiting for their next APS-C body. Hopefully in DSLR form rather than rangefinder.
If Tokina makes their 11-16/2.8 or 11-20/2.8 in E-mount, that would be awesome as well.
Awesome video, your channel is full of incredibly helpful videos. Appreciate all the time you put into it!!
Love this new editing style! 😍
Such a beautiful layout!
Great review and a lot of fun!!! Props to Vivian! 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
This video was unexpectedly super funny lol your delivery is very good and I learned a lot.
already have 16-55 F2.8, and I still plan to buy this Tamron 17-70 F2.8
I love zoom and focus flipped ao i have more control over the oens when zooming in
Vivian got the like. Good content on the lens. Wondering if the pulsing effect on the background has gone away with the FX-30 and newer cameras.
Thank you Jason for your great review! I’ve a Sony a6500 and I'm a videomaker but, sometimes I made various shooting photos for the clients. I noticed a difference in term of sharp, Sony 16-55 is better but... as I understand it, there is no reason to buy the Sony 16-55 because the Tamron is definitely the best choise. (I’ve also a Sony 30mm 1.4 for portraits photos). I’d love to know what do you think about it. sorry for my english 😂 🇮🇹
good stuff Jason. Tamron did a great job. the 24-105 zoom range is a great walk around 1 zoom for travel / street and every day shots. f/2.8 constant aperture is great. lenses are expensive. you get what you pay for. For now Ill use my Canon mount Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 lens with my Metabones or other adapters ;) but this looks enticing for my a6500/a6000 setup
Got mine last Tuesday!
Perfect for me.
I love your review so much
Good review! I think it’s the perfect lens for APSC but I’m using my 17-28mm on a crop for the moment. My full frame stuff I have a ton more lenses to work with for wide shots.
Glad to see you back on RUclips!
your editing skills are getting better!
Dope video! Ur vids are really helping me with making a decision for a new camera/lens!
production values going up big time. congrats man =)
Deciding on a lens is so hard 😩 but these vids definitely help, so thank you! Just not fully decided for my a6000 quite yet.
Hello, which one did you buy? how did it go?
You guys are awesome! Loved the review. Thank you.
Just curious, what is the choice between Tamron 17-70 vs Sigma 18-50?
I had them both for testing, kept the Tamron, sold the Sigma. My opinion: Sharpness is equally good on both lenses, can't go wrong with either of them. Sigma has a bit smoother Bokeh. Tamron has the better minimum focus distance, meaning you get closer to the subject and can do almost macro photos. Sigma is cheaper and way more compact, it is amazingly small for a zoom lens with that fast aperture. BUT it has no image stabilizer. The Tamron has that vibration control, wich works really well. Sigma has only 18-50 mm while the Tamron gives you 1 more mm in wide angle and 15(!) more mm on the telephoto end. But Tamron is more expensive, larger and heavier. So in the end, what is more important to you? You have to choose between: small, lightweight, smoother bokeh and cheaper, but less zoomrange and no stabilisation (Sigma) vs. more zoomrange, stabilisation, better focal distance, but bigger, heavier and more expensive (Tamron). I went with the Tamron and am happy with it. The only downside to me is size and weight. Sometime i wish it would be smaller. But then i wouldnt have that focal range and stabilisation 🤷♂ Sharpness does not really make a difference on those lenses.
@@schnubbel76 thank you so much, I chose Sigma because of the size and weight.
Great video content. Thank you for the honest and detailed review.
i plan to get the A6600 whit this tamron 17/70mm and also an adapter for using my canon & sigma glass. tank's for you're work Jason.
Do you think that this lense is better than sigma 18-50 2.8?
That's why I'm here too. But at the end of the day, both lenses are for different purposes. The 17-70 has more range at the wide-angle and at the tele-range and comes with image stabilization. However, the sigma is significantly more compact, cheaper and lighter which definitely plays a role on the APS-C market (to save weight and money)
Nevertheless I think I will chose the Tamron 17-70, while keeping the kit-lens for hiking and stuff like that.
Hey Jason,
Thank you for the new video!
What is a good starter camera if you want to learn how to take good pictures of nature
Recieved mine yesterday! My first good lens:D
Glad to hear you’re enjoying it!
Definitely your best review! Covering all points into details and awesome editing and stuns 😅
thanks for watching!! :D
I have a 6600 with the IBIS so I realize the VC in this lens is great but I bet that adds a lot of heft. It's a rather heavy lens compared to the sony 16-55. I need an all-in-one for backpacking and I'm strongly leaning towards this. Decisions decisions!
Hi Jason Vong, thx for your experience review. If you have to choose between the Tamron 17-70 f2.8 in combination with the Tamron the Tamron 70-180 f2.8. Or the 17-28 f2.8 and the 28-75 f2.8 lens what will be your choice and why? I am lazy and don't want to chance. Do Photo, persons, landscape, buildings and sports. Filming is a great hobby and i want to buy the Sony A6700. Greatz and thank you in foward.
One of my favorite lens is the sony 24-105 f4 which i have it on my camara most of the time... now its way better, for APSC- and 2.8 the whole package!
What makes it way better? Aren’t they practically the same rendering if you take into account crop factor?
@@trogdor f2.8 maybe ? Price could be another factor ? what about weight ?
Commented for the hard work Jason did for this video.
Thanks dude. Great review of this lens. Lack of oss on ff is why I have stayed in apsc, and this lens is top of my list. Btw, what was the ultrawide lens you shot on? Worth it?
3 weeks ago I bought 16-70 f4 for a 599€. With 100€ Sony winter cashback and 100€ welcome to Alpha bonus cashback it costed me ony 399€. It is really good lens.
Been waiting for this review when you mentioned it on your Sony 35mm 1.4 G Master video. This helps with my decision to buy this lens and sell my Sigma 16mm and 56mm lenses. Thank you!
Just ordered that lens. Exited to use it. Little surprised for that $ it's not made in Japan. Will be on a6600 which has in body stabilization. Will be my first non Sony lens for that body.
Great review! Same questions:
1) Tamron vs. Sony 18-105
2) Tamron vs. Sigma Trio
- Hybrid shooter that owns both alternatives
Great review! Appreciate all of the info!
Balls, tips and goodness knows what else? Jason is definitely feeling frisky. Is Spring around the corner? :-) Ta for the review.
Just got this lens and omg can't wait to go to Yosemite national park and get some cinematic vids
Great review. Thank you for showing our options. Price range is definitely exciting tho.
Just remember that in a vintage lens line-up there was a Tamron 28-105 f/2.8 for full frames. Back then it wasnt good, but today we certainly do have the technology to make it happen....
Jason!!! Great great video mate. Loved it.
Great vid as always man!
I think this Tamron lens is a steal at $800.
I almost pulled the trigger on the Sony 16-50 f2.8, for my A6400. So I guess it’s good that I didn’t. I use the Tamron 24-70 at work on an a7II.
I’ll put it on my wishlist.
I was wondering why nobody was talking about this thing , a zoom lens like this at 2.8 that doesn’t cost more than everything in the Sony apsc ecosystem has been what we’ve been asking for for the longest time 🙌🏾
there are a few other reviews out already but yeah the buzz seems kinda low on this lens. Hopefully this video will bring up the radar on it!
What is your thought between Sigma 18_50 and tamron 17_70?
I have the same doubt. you compared someone. Thanks?
Great Review.
Really like that lense. What do you think about it versus the brand new sigma 18-50 ?
I'm hesitating between those two lenses for both video and photo.
Hey Jason! Is this lens good for vlogging? & what about stabilizing?
Quality review, as always! Thank you...
This is what apsc needed! Finally an all in one solution!
Best comparison video between 1655g and 1770!!
I love that road from Zion to Bryce, wish I had a nice camera on a gimbal to capture it when I was there.
Definitely my next lens purchase. Im waiting for for the a74 to come out to upgrade to full frame. So until then, this will really round out my arsenal for my a6600. Id really like to see the difference between the 24mm equivalent of the Sony vs the 25.5mm equiv of the Tamron
This is a must add to my camera bag. Shooting with 6400 and the "shake control" or what ever is desperately needed. thanks for the video.
So true! I own a 6400 and even with a gimbal (weebill s) the jittering is noticeable. I have a Samyang 12mm with no oss.. I think this Zoom's Tamron will be a good choice
Hey guys isn't the picture quality of 6100 and 6400 same?
awesome review, esp on the autofocus part
I have an a6000 currently, and looking to get this lens. If I wait for a sale i can get it for rougly 600 euro.
But I could also get a used sony a7ii with the tamron 28-75 f/2.8 for about 800 in total. Would that be a better purchase? The camera and lens would be used, but they seem to be in good condition.
Tamron for Sony e-mount rocks...glad Vivian is ok