2019 LEGO Star Wars UCS Imperial Star Destroyer 75252 REVIEW (4K)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 20 дек 2024

Комментарии • 1,2 тыс.

  • @StarWarsTheory
    @StarWarsTheory 5 лет назад +2099

    Oh, it's beautiful.

    • @fizzy2592
      @fizzy2592 4 года назад +65

      How has David not hearted this???

    • @waiuss599
      @waiuss599 4 года назад +6

      i see now omg

    • @nicobrix5324
      @nicobrix5324 4 года назад +22

      Holy crap, how has David not hearted this.

    • @michaelbrann7445
      @michaelbrann7445 4 года назад +12

      I LOVE KRENNIC! AND YOUR CONTENT

    • @steven5755
      @steven5755 4 года назад +17

      Wow I can’t believe Star Wars theory watched this video

  • @barbarjinx3802
    @barbarjinx3802 5 лет назад +1708

    At what point did you go back upstairs and close the door?

    • @rojomojobrand5364
      @rojomojobrand5364 5 лет назад +55

      durban73 37nabrud I was seriously wondering that too, do you think it’s still open?

    • @brianorozco1074
      @brianorozco1074 5 лет назад +311

      Legend says that the door is still open to this day

    • @Elder74
      @Elder74 5 лет назад +24

      durban73 37nabrud at 0:20 there is a transition after putting the box on the table.

    • @itmegorski9716
      @itmegorski9716 5 лет назад +2

      Thank you

    • @jangounchained5279
      @jangounchained5279 5 лет назад +5

      Door stays opened to let all Lego sets to SINK IN the "LEGO VORTEX BASEMENT" !!! Bwahahahahha

  • @undead.rising
    @undead.rising 5 лет назад +1950

    If there was only ever going to be two minifiigures only, it should have had Vader and Tarkin included.

    • @ajterry5626
      @ajterry5626 5 лет назад +82

      Tarkin was only on the Death Star though

    • @andresgagge6977
      @andresgagge6977 5 лет назад +73

      Vader and admiral Piett perhaps, Tarkin was never seen on this ship
      EDIT: Yea sorry I was wrong, Piett was never on the ship

    • @qoladipo5754
      @qoladipo5754 5 лет назад +20

      @@andresgagge6977 neither was piett right? He only came into play in the executor

    • @andresgagge6977
      @andresgagge6977 5 лет назад +7

      @@qoladipo5754 He is I think, in ESB he was the second in command that gets a "promotion" after Vader kills the previous admiral in charge of the ship when attacking Hoth.

    • @5trider29
      @5trider29 5 лет назад +12

      Andres Gagge Admiral Piett was on the Super Star Destroyer Executor

  • @victormagnusson1917
    @victormagnusson1917 5 лет назад +406

    for the Star Destroyer to be in minifig scale it need to be 32 meter

    • @LordVulcan93
      @LordVulcan93 5 лет назад +30

      Someone will do it.

    • @joermnyc
      @joermnyc 5 лет назад +49

      Maybe Microfig scale? Microfig Vader... “If you only knew the power of the tiny dark side!”

    • @zer0edgy952
      @zer0edgy952 5 лет назад +2

      @@joermnyc :D

    • @cillian9663
      @cillian9663 5 лет назад +19

      Then you could actually make a tie fighter hanger in it

    • @ptr7715
      @ptr7715 5 лет назад +4

      Still waiting on Lego.

  • @lordofthebricks1
    @lordofthebricks1 5 лет назад +919

    I wish they included exclusive Darth Vader miifigure with red eyes like in Rogue One and A New Hope

    • @kurtispowers5776
      @kurtispowers5776 5 лет назад +10

      LordOf TheBricks they weren’t really red more like a brick color

    • @ajterry5626
      @ajterry5626 5 лет назад +81

      ONI, Section 3 was that really a necessary correction?

    • @christianbell2420
      @christianbell2420 5 лет назад +6

      AJ Terry yes

    • @allffrommars6019
      @allffrommars6019 5 лет назад +2

      2 Stupid figures... no Vader in!!!!

    • @ashdoll217
      @ashdoll217 5 лет назад +6

      @@kurtispowers5776 bricks are red

  • @seoul08
    @seoul08 5 лет назад +895

    Me getting this:
    “Awesome!”
    3 1/2 hours later
    *cries as I open bag 27 with bloody fingers*

    • @AdamG1983
      @AdamG1983 5 лет назад +53

      Worth it

    • @artus2862
      @artus2862 5 лет назад +28

      Same when i biuld Lego technic porshe lol

    • @AA-mx5fc
      @AA-mx5fc 4 года назад +6

      There isn't bag 27 lol

    • @李伟杰-z1o
      @李伟杰-z1o 4 года назад +1

      Maybe we can refer this price jointoy.com/collections/new-arrival-1/products/king-81098-ucs-5278pcs-max-imperial-star-destroyer-75252

    • @birdboi6288
      @birdboi6288 4 года назад

      Yea

  • @villelepoaho4105
    @villelepoaho4105 5 лет назад +322

    Considering that the Star Destroyer is 1,6 kilometers long, each of those studs would be the size of a house in real life. That's pretty crazy...

  • @hasannasir9969
    @hasannasir9969 5 лет назад +648

    Bruh Devastator without Vader is like StarWars without lightsabers

    • @RogueJedi501
      @RogueJedi501 5 лет назад +19

      Hopeless Wizard or is like Star Wars without a war 😂

    • @hasannasir9969
      @hasannasir9969 5 лет назад +2

      @@RogueJedi501 haha

    • @ocularzombie6679
      @ocularzombie6679 5 лет назад +6

      @@RogueJedi501 then it would just be those random political scenes and negotiations...basically ep 1 would be the longest...

    • @RogueJedi501
      @RogueJedi501 5 лет назад +1

      Lord Revan but there is a war in Episode I.

    • @ocularzombie6679
      @ocularzombie6679 5 лет назад

      @@RogueJedi501 that will be taken out tho

  • @Bob-cy6rd
    @Bob-cy6rd 5 лет назад +54

    Sometimes I like building 5000 larger pieces as opposed to 8500 small pieces. I have both the UCS Millennium Falcon (2019) and this one - VIP early access. Really like the structural upgrades over the old UCS ISD and no magnets.

  • @TheBrickWiz
    @TheBrickWiz 5 лет назад +208

    Awesome review, David! I gotta admit, this thing is so much bigger than I originally thought. Gotta get me one of these soon!

    • @kyealexander3913
      @kyealexander3913 5 лет назад +1

      Lp32R1VAL worth is subjective that’s why to some people it’s worth it and to others it’s way to expensive

  • @RJB-V
    @RJB-V 5 лет назад +115

    I don't get the interior argument. These sets are really just to put on display and to look at.

    • @farrelariefatx554
      @farrelariefatx554 5 лет назад +4

      Yeah

    • @muisverriet
      @muisverriet 5 лет назад +30

      The Super Star Destroyer had an interior and it was really bad. I'd rather these sets look good and be stable than have an interior.

    • @tanner5809
      @tanner5809 5 лет назад +30

      I think people just want a little extra because of how much it costs and how big it is.

    • @baileyfurio2327
      @baileyfurio2327 4 года назад +4

      Idc, to be truly impressive it needs interior. This is LEGO. This is UCS. Only 2 minifigs? So what! You cant do shit with them, not even put them on the bridge with an exterior window. All of course is imho and it does look really good, Im just saying tho. Peace

    • @baileyfurio2327
      @baileyfurio2327 4 года назад

      Evergreen Emeralds hey fellow Lego interior fan, does this friend of urs have a channel!

  • @brutalerik87
    @brutalerik87 5 лет назад +368

    Well technically lego did pay you for this video.. You got a 700$ Star Destroyer. Lol

    • @ranekeisenkralle8265
      @ranekeisenkralle8265 5 лет назад +5

      True, but i would heavily dispute it being worth 700. 250 maybe, but no more.

    • @DudeImHereAlready
      @DudeImHereAlready 5 лет назад +138

      $250? You must be new to LEGO

    • @ranekeisenkralle8265
      @ranekeisenkralle8265 5 лет назад +15

      @@DudeImHereAlready Not at all. I know full well how overpriced that stuff is. Which is why I haven't bought any lego in decades.

    • @samcowell5465
      @samcowell5465 5 лет назад +66

      Ranek Eisenkralle and yet you still fill comment sections griping about their prices?

    • @ranekeisenkralle8265
      @ranekeisenkralle8265 5 лет назад +33

      @@samcowell5465 I'm not "filling" them. I am voicing my opinion whihc is as much my right as it is yours. You don't need to agree to my opinion. However I find the current climate of self-censoring to avoid "negativity" deeply unhealthy. You can only fix something if you know what is wrong.

  • @Netbrix
    @Netbrix 5 лет назад +163

    If they included an exclusive Vader w leg and arm printing this set would be perfect

    • @bemysugardaddy596
      @bemysugardaddy596 5 лет назад +12

      And people would still complain "Greedy Lego put an exclusive figure into such an expensive set? Wow".
      I do agree though

    • @Netbrix
      @Netbrix 5 лет назад +10

      Be MySugarDaddy yeh true people will always complain but I think as long as they don’t add a completely new character giving us an exclusive version of an existing one is more than fair

    • @Leo-ch4qu
      @Leo-ch4qu 4 года назад

      @@bemysugardaddy596 greedy, but smart

  • @suupreem1299
    @suupreem1299 5 лет назад +986

    Now make a shield gate, buy another, and crash them into each other
    Edit: wtf so many likes..
    Now this is getting out of hand! Now there are 824 of them!

  • @TheUndeadMerc04
    @TheUndeadMerc04 5 лет назад +168

    Next -> Ucs super Star Destroyer: $1,800

    • @xCNapo
      @xCNapo 5 лет назад +4

      Just to be clear, i like your irony. Not the fact. :'D

    • @collin3987
      @collin3987 5 лет назад +6

      $1,000,000

    • @FalconX79
      @FalconX79 5 лет назад +3

      I'd buy it.

    • @LordVulcan93
      @LordVulcan93 5 лет назад +1

      TAKE MY MONEY!

    • @joermnyc
      @joermnyc 5 лет назад +4

      Only 10 feet long!

  • @b3nja_garcia748
    @b3nja_garcia748 5 лет назад +118

    I want a VENATOR!! But that looks awesome.

  • @jacobhughes2285
    @jacobhughes2285 5 лет назад +58

    I'll be honest, I was so skeptical when I first heard about this, but you've really pushed me onto this set!

  • @cyrax83
    @cyrax83 5 лет назад +144

    "Guys it's worth it it's not expensive!". Also "Lego sent me this for free" haha

    • @PlanetGoddess
      @PlanetGoddess 5 лет назад +11

      He still... buys things. He understands how splurging 700 feels

    • @gottagofast9464
      @gottagofast9464 4 года назад +1

      @@AwesomeBrickSaucenever heard about inflation?

    • @gottagofast9464
      @gottagofast9464 4 года назад +1

      @@AwesomeBrickSauce it has 1000 parts more, 2 minifigures, a cool instruction, an awesome box, its a lot bigger

    • @Kncklcht
      @Kncklcht 4 года назад +1

      @@gottagofast9464 The interior construction of the old one was gray at least... and thus it didn't suck that you could see it from the outside... which you still can with the new one

    • @xolotltolox7626
      @xolotltolox7626 3 года назад +2

      It's 100% not worth it, the interior is a colorful mess and you can see it through cracks in the model

  • @speedylordinc.3748
    @speedylordinc.3748 5 лет назад +8

    That subtle laugh in the thumbnail says it all, it's the coolest lego set ever!!

  • @micahnike18
    @micahnike18 5 лет назад +41

    I can't afford this set but I think that it looks very accurate to the movies. What a breathtaking set to look at!

    • @AJSJ1987
      @AJSJ1987 Год назад +1

      lol come tax return is when we make a purchase like this I just got into Legos recently and Star Wars is definitely one of my favorites definitely getting this soon

  • @seanchen4906
    @seanchen4906 5 лет назад +12

    The last turret is a dual heavy ion cannon while the rest are heavy turbolaser turrets

    • @freestalkerdotfr6391
      @freestalkerdotfr6391 5 лет назад +1

      Liked cause I made the same comment but later.

    • @seanchen4906
      @seanchen4906 5 лет назад

      @@Pershingww2 Some people might not be as interested into technical details of star wars, but i believe he still loves star wars!

  • @lachlangeorge8364
    @lachlangeorge8364 5 лет назад +5

    “It will make a fine addition to my collection” Thanks for the incredible review, been waiting for this set to be rereleased for years so it’s a definite buy for me.

  • @92EEM
    @92EEM 5 лет назад +8

    I've wanted the 2003 version since I was a kid. As an adult I was willing to spend thousands to get it on the secondary market New In Box because it was always the one set that I wanted. I'm so happy they made a newer more detailed version. I have the UCS Millennium Falcon but, for me, the Star Destroyer is way more impressive of a display piece. I can't wait. Now to save up.

  • @MillenniumFalcon
    @MillenniumFalcon Год назад +1

    OMG - I am a new fan of your channel and just catching up to this video, this is so super cool, in total awe of your collection.

  • @kevinyoung9557
    @kevinyoung9557 5 лет назад +9

    My only gripes are I wish the build had more snot technique. The build is truly beautiful. Huge and well detailed to boot the builder did a fantastic job.Minifigures dont care and interior I could even care less about .This is what a UCS should be.Well done lego.Is it worth 700 dollars.I think so.Its a gem.

  • @sportscarfacts8180
    @sportscarfacts8180 5 лет назад +14

    The rank of the officer is lieutenant, I recognise it from the thrawn comics, thrawn wore it at the start of it

    • @mbenkelley1
      @mbenkelley1 5 лет назад +1

      anonymous backstabber Impressive! Most impressive.....

    • @CaptainM792
      @CaptainM792 5 лет назад +3

      One of the most common ranks in the Imperial Navy.

    • @callumpears1523
      @callumpears1523 5 лет назад

      I've wanted a lieutenant for ages so am actually tempted by that figure.

  • @DavidBubarYT
    @DavidBubarYT 5 лет назад +24

    but the real question is: is the front door still open?!

  • @M4ShermanDawg
    @M4ShermanDawg 5 лет назад +7

    I think you could definitely create a plate-based interior that branches out from the supporting technic structure. The only problem would maybe be weight, but from what I can tell, it seems like you can remove the top superstructure, which would let you get into the interior for at least a little bit of MOC detail, and it doesn't seem to take too much effort to do so.

  • @patrickcassup8377
    @patrickcassup8377 5 лет назад +4

    Surprised at how impressive the old version is compared to the new for being over 15 years old- it makes the super star destroyer seem underwhelming. Great video, one of the first to actually build and get uploaded. You have a new fan!

  • @RogueJedi501
    @RogueJedi501 5 лет назад +72

    Rip the Executor Super Star Destroyer. They’ll need to make an updated one that’s 2x bigger than the UCS Star Destroyer 😂

    • @Reapacz
      @Reapacz 5 лет назад +4

      It needs to be 14 times bigger😂😂

    • @RogueJedi501
      @RogueJedi501 5 лет назад +1

      y-raptix老板 yeah but I don’t think Lego would do that. That’s why I’d settle for 2x bigger at least. 3-4x bigger would be amazing though

    • @Reapacz
      @Reapacz 5 лет назад +2

      @@RogueJedi501 they won't do that😂 it would cost 2-3k

    • @robinkonig5828
      @robinkonig5828 5 лет назад +1

      there is a possibility that they will remake the executor and the death star 2

    • @Nuggie_butter
      @Nuggie_butter 5 лет назад

      It would have to be 12 times larger to compete with this but it would also be 12 times the price

  • @rihardsburbickis6620
    @rihardsburbickis6620 5 лет назад +65

    This is definitely my NEW favorite UCS set!

    • @CreativeCache101
      @CreativeCache101 5 лет назад +6

      Cummon, the falcon is at least not all grey😅

    • @undead.rising
      @undead.rising 5 лет назад

      Definitely. Go back to school!

    • @undead.rising
      @undead.rising 5 лет назад +1

      @@CreativeCache101 The person who used the wrong word. Rihards said defiantly instead of definitely. My post was a correction of Rihards Burbickis.

    • @Ghost0fLuna528
      @Ghost0fLuna528 5 лет назад +1

      @JTR Productions This is modeled after the Devastator, not the Defiance.

    • @Montyh7
      @Montyh7 5 лет назад

      @@CreativeCache101 Nah.

  • @jedishadow4083
    @jedishadow4083 5 лет назад +25

    Sith are red Jedi are blue I can't afford this set and neither can you

    • @timwoods8297
      @timwoods8297 5 лет назад +6

      Sith are red Jedi are blue i dont need it neither do you

    • @jedishadow4083
      @jedishadow4083 5 лет назад +7

      @@timwoods8297 maul is red and r2 is blue, it's a shame but your probably true!

    • @CaptainM792
      @CaptainM792 5 лет назад +3

      At least I can afford the minifigs in this set.

    • @jedishadow4083
      @jedishadow4083 5 лет назад

      @@CaptainM792 haha😉 me too! If you can afford two Imperial Officer minifigs then somebody's got issues lol

    • @captaincaptains9063
      @captaincaptains9063 4 года назад

      I got it for Christmas

  • @fletcher2167
    @fletcher2167 4 года назад +4

    Love the reviews David! I completely agree. It's not always about the piece count, its about the weight of the set as well and this set well deserves its price tag in that category.

  • @simonchoi973
    @simonchoi973 10 месяцев назад +2

    Sometimes I think the fact that I can’t afford a big house like yours is probably a good indicator that such expansive LEGO set was never meant for me

  • @EdgeofBricks
    @EdgeofBricks 5 лет назад +11

    I am slightly disappointed, too high price and a lot of studs. Also without interiors. Box looks perfect! ISD from Raskolnikov is the best!

    • @drewbricks7934
      @drewbricks7934 5 лет назад

      Edge of Bricks UCs isn’t about interior. They are ment for display. Though more minifiigures would have been better tbh.

    • @aaronswann1604
      @aaronswann1604 5 лет назад +1

      Ok, so I can see your opinion, but realistically they can’t cover up those studs, otherwise you’d be paying effectively twice the price. Also, you complain about price, but again, this set is more massive compared to the Millennium Falcon, and sure, it doesn’t have nearly as many pieces, but it needs to have larger, more expensive pieces in order to cover that larger, more massive size.

    • @aaronswann1604
      @aaronswann1604 5 лет назад +1

      Also the interior, again if you were willing to pay almost twice as much money, then be my guest. As for LEGO, they have to make this set large and detailed, but also at reasonable price for direct consumers.

    • @EdgeofBricks
      @EdgeofBricks 5 лет назад +1

      @@drewbricks7934 UCS Millennium Falcon have interior :) at a high price (700USD) you can demand a little more. But this is still great set

  • @caw216
    @caw216 4 года назад +1

    Just got mine in the mail yesterday, can't wait to get started on it!!! Can't believe you can do an almost 5,000 piece build in 10 hours. That's insane!!!

  • @adrianprepelita8683
    @adrianprepelita8683 3 года назад +17

    4700+ pieces for $700 and Ninjago gardens are 5800 pieces for $300. Man! That Star Wars license worth some big money!

  • @claychapman3624
    @claychapman3624 4 года назад +1

    He is man of comment, focus, and sheer fucking will!

  • @IllustriousCrocoduck
    @IllustriousCrocoduck 2 года назад +4

    For me it comes down to the minifigs. It needs a Vader, at LEAST. Maybe Captain Antilles, too. But we need more, and more important characters.
    As someone who likes Star Destroyers more than anything, I'm left thinking of the cantina set and all it's iconic figures.
    Many of us know Devastator is Vader's ship, but let's be frank here, it's not the ship that carries the infamy.

  • @Sam-iw6te
    @Sam-iw6te 5 лет назад +2

    Good review. I'm glad to hear you mention value when talking about the process. I get that for some people the set is more valuable to them than the money they spent on it, which is fine, and that's really true for all things. I'm glad you were able to be objective about it, while most fans on either side of the discussion just scream that they're right.
    I still can't spend $700 on it. I've got the UCS Falcon, but that has much more emotional value. Id love to get it, someday, but doubt it'll be around by the time I have the space and money for it.

  • @andrewmoynihan4785
    @andrewmoynihan4785 5 лет назад +6

    16:44 I think I can guess why David cut that

  • @Jabber-ig3iw
    @Jabber-ig3iw 4 года назад +3

    Just about to pull the trigger on this, probably going to get the lights as well.

  • @smokeater2804
    @smokeater2804 5 лет назад +4

    Great review, even though I already knew I was buying this you sold me the rest of the way. I think it's also worth pointing out, if I recall correctly (I was 11 when the original Star Destroyer was released), the original Star Destroyer was around 400 dollars. Adjusting for inflation, that price is worth between 550 and 750 dollars today....So despite the comparison to the Millennium Falcon, I feel this is a pretty fair price.

  • @no.ca5270
    @no.ca5270 4 месяца назад +1

    16:40 I think that’s actually an incredibly average distance, would even say a big difference…

  • @wathog01
    @wathog01 5 лет назад +13

    The set is so beautiful, that I actually don’t think this kind of things is done by LEGO themselves
    Also, the Saturn V in the background, it’s tilted......my OCD just can’t stand it

  • @NoahgotLEGO
    @NoahgotLEGO 5 лет назад +22

    Looks awesome, wish I could afford. That gap down the middle really bugs me though

    • @Larry-Lobster
      @Larry-Lobster 5 лет назад +1

      Noah got lego The gap is a lot smaller than the 2002 variant though.

    • @NoahgotLEGO
      @NoahgotLEGO 5 лет назад

      I think the play set versions do a better job with the gap

    • @jotarokujo1317
      @jotarokujo1317 4 года назад +1

      Honestly i am thinking of buying the isd and modding out the gap

  • @Cisio86
    @Cisio86 5 лет назад +7

    This set is incredible. It's seems so smooth and clean. I'm not sure if I want to buy it day1 or wait for discount. Great video BTW. Maybe you can do a video comparison more in detail. It will be great!

  • @l1nktheher085
    @l1nktheher085 4 года назад +1

    I just love how David just leaves the door wide open at the beginning of the video

  • @AdamG1983
    @AdamG1983 4 года назад +4

    Imperial Engineers: "You can have it in any color you want, as long as it's gray"

  • @taylorflowers4015
    @taylorflowers4015 5 лет назад +1

    The point in the timelapse where you had to place all of the super tiny pieces along the super long strip looked like the best representation of Lego hell

    • @madMARTYNmarsh1981
      @madMARTYNmarsh1981 5 лет назад

      There are other descriptive words besides super, learn some.

  • @Willrc57
    @Willrc57 5 лет назад +8

    Who else noticed that the Executor’s bridge was missing?

  • @reidveryan9414
    @reidveryan9414 5 лет назад +1

    The first through third turret on each upper flank are dual heavy turbo laser turret, the 4th is a dual ion cannon turret.

  • @Rachminov
    @Rachminov 5 лет назад +6

    This cost £650 in the UK, that’s $800 and the same price as the Falcon.

  • @Sp3ctreNova
    @Sp3ctreNova 5 лет назад +1

    the silent walking and smiling at the beginning was very awkward, i love it

  • @GJBricks
    @GJBricks 5 лет назад +12

    Thanks for the honest run through? I’m coming around to this as I love - and missed out - on the 2002 set. It still doesn’t feel like good value, but by weight it’s the same as the falcon. It looks amazing!
    Do you think it could be modified to add an interior?

    • @DomesticatedDuck
      @DomesticatedDuck 4 года назад +3

      The interior is almost hollow apart from the Technic skeleton so you could probably add an interior.

  • @ButterWolf117
    @ButterWolf117 2 года назад

    Just finished building mine, and man it is so worth it. It is so good looking, so detailed, and I had a blast putting it together. If you can get it for less than msrp price, do it for sure!

  • @chriss3479
    @chriss3479 5 лет назад +8

    I don’t think any of this review is really fair considering you got the set for free?

  • @knyte8706
    @knyte8706 5 лет назад +1

    This is hands down the best giant LEGO space Dorito ever. So glad I got it for Christmas!

    • @ptr7715
      @ptr7715 5 лет назад

      Lucky. I'm saving for one. Have about 200 dollars to go.

    • @knyte8706
      @knyte8706 5 лет назад

      FaLcOnz I hope you get it!

  • @ItsStarkiller
    @ItsStarkiller 5 лет назад +3

    Legend said that the door was never closed even to this very day...

  • @DaveRequiem
    @DaveRequiem 10 месяцев назад +1

    Wait did I miss a step, my Tantive IV doesn’t look like that

  • @ellorium
    @ellorium 5 лет назад +3

    7 seconds into the intro. Loving it already

  • @joeypowerstef6105
    @joeypowerstef6105 3 года назад +1

    Would love to see a ucs of the republic venator class with the size of this star destroyer

  • @aviationclub2637
    @aviationclub2637 5 лет назад +39

    Challenge: Buy many Star Destroyers and built a cake out of it :D

  • @Pvt-Parts14
    @Pvt-Parts14 5 лет назад +2

    Best asmr ever. plus rattling legos is music to my ears

  • @whoknows3820
    @whoknows3820 5 лет назад +6

    can we see it next to the ucs millennium falcon? i'm trying to decide which one to buy (first).

    • @daangamewolf2933
      @daangamewolf2933 5 лет назад +2

      I would do the millennium falcon. It has an interior, lots of mini figures and it's just more beautiful and iconic in my eyes

    • @andrewmoynihan4785
      @andrewmoynihan4785 5 лет назад +2

      I'd go for the destroyer man.

    • @kq1534
      @kq1534 5 лет назад +1

      Who Knows? Get the Falcon first, the ISD just came out. Trust me, you don’t want to pay after markets prices for it once it retires

    • @PlanetGoddess
      @PlanetGoddess 5 лет назад

      I would contribute but I don't particularly care for the Falcon

  • @mrdoofa9357
    @mrdoofa9357 3 года назад +2

    Imagine how awesome a UCS Dreadnought would be!!! I’m sure it’ll come one day.

  • @5trider29
    @5trider29 5 лет назад +10

    Yes, it is an amazing set visually. Still justifying the pros and cons of it, especially on price, lack of interior and lack of minifigs.
    Once built, it’s going straight on display. Don’t get me wrong, it’s a beautiful set, $700USD is just too high, especially pointing out the cons. $600USD would be tolerable.
    Already happy with the new UCS millennium falcon. And with the new episode 9 sets coming, best save my $ on those sets

  • @shannocvirek
    @shannocvirek 5 лет назад +1

    Really loved watching this review and speed build. I think the the best part of the review is how you explained the weight of the set to the price in my opinion it it’s a more accurate way of determining a sets value. With the UCS Millennium Falcon it cost about $53 for each pound that the set ways so taking into consideration that UCS Star Destroyer is only 2 pounds lighter it actually comes out to being right at $700 for the set and it’s weight. I can’t wait to get my hands on this set and display it next to the Millennium Falcon. 😁

  • @F32Daniel43x
    @F32Daniel43x 5 лет назад +5

    damn he so exited over a lego set he didnt shut his door 😂😂

  • @elsinorebrewing3841
    @elsinorebrewing3841 5 лет назад

    It is -19 C in Calgary tonight and -28 C with the windchill and Calgary got hit with 4 inches of snow this week.As a kid 40 years ago I would have been delighted about this as I shoveled sidewalks as a kid.After dinner I would put on the snowsuit and boots/touque/scarf and go out and shovel snow which I used to buy Lego.....biggest set I bought was the yellow Lego Castle and it cost me $80 way back then.
    Cant fathom spending close to $1000 on this as adult who is paying the bills.

  • @sirornstein
    @sirornstein 5 лет назад +69

    Amazing, Fantastic, Sexy, Beautiful, Awesome and every good description word. Definitely the best UCS set and on of the best LEGO sets. Fantastic Video David

    • @arminboninsegna
      @arminboninsegna 5 лет назад +4

      Some small interior details would have been nice too

    • @thejfoshow1320
      @thejfoshow1320 5 лет назад

      Armin Boninsegna why? It’s a display set.

  • @vincentperon2950
    @vincentperon2950 5 лет назад +2

    Moral of the story, If you like what you see, get it cause it's better than it looks. If you think it's overpriced, move on an buy another set or nothing. And if you are hesitating, just check it in a lego store than make an enlighten decision based on your feeling about it.
    Either way the polemic is pointless. The way we price sets is irrelevant, always has been. It's just an empiric point of view.

  • @johnornelas9741
    @johnornelas9741 5 лет назад +12

    I agree. This is a display set not a play set. So I'm ok with no interior. As far as price, look at how many large pieces are in this set. As you stated, cost more to make. It's not rocket science .

    • @santaria19
      @santaria19 5 лет назад

      Well isn't every UCS set a display set?

  • @smokinjopoliticallyincorre1313
    @smokinjopoliticallyincorre1313 5 лет назад +1

    My daughter is getting this tomorrow for Christmas , I think I'm actually excited about helping her build this

  • @CreativeCache101
    @CreativeCache101 5 лет назад +13

    When your realise david now has a lego room and a MOC room😍

    • @CreativeCache101
      @CreativeCache101 5 лет назад

      @Lp32R1VAL i mean he liked some of them, hes kinda vusy tho to just reply to every comment on a video, who does that anyway?😅

    • @CreativeCache101
      @CreativeCache101 5 лет назад

      @Lp32R1VAL he cares but time is money he cant spend hours replying to comments because he's doing other stuff

    • @CreativeCache101
      @CreativeCache101 5 лет назад

      @Lp32R1VAL no he does care just not enough to spend an hour a day replying to comments, and he'd just be saying thanks most of the time, whats the point in that? He allready says thanks in his vids

    • @firehawk4872
      @firehawk4872 5 лет назад

      Lp32R1VAL Jesus my dude, stop commenting on nearly every post saying “hE dOeSnT cArE”...boi, stop✋🏼his subs know they he cares, it’s people like you that try to ruin the channel, just stop🤦🏻‍♂️

    • @firehawk4872
      @firehawk4872 5 лет назад

      Lp32R1VAL woah...I wonder what it means by 130,725 views...hmm, curious, hold on...I think it means that the channel isn’t ruined or dead, you’re sadly mistaken that the channel “ruined itself”, It could probably happen, if you keep coming along and talking shit about it, but I doubt it😬

  • @georgevalentine6807
    @georgevalentine6807 2 года назад +1

    I like how in the timelapse it looks like he is spazzing out

  • @owenryan2005
    @owenryan2005 5 лет назад +3

    In the uk it’s £650, the same price as the millennium falcon

  • @timwoods8297
    @timwoods8297 5 лет назад +1

    I like how in rogue one they made starfighters look both modern and dandy but at the same time looking kinda like plastic toys they used in OT

    • @PlanetGoddess
      @PlanetGoddess 5 лет назад

      This set looks almost exactly like the scariff scene

  • @azard3
    @azard3 5 лет назад +4

    Could you do a size comparison with the UCS Falcon please

  • @jamesgammage3725
    @jamesgammage3725 2 года назад

    Coming in super-late here, but just wanted to point something out. The reason the newer one looks the way it does is because the design team for it made it waaaay more screen and production-accurate than the one on the left. So, that "smushed-down" appearance you pointed out is because the command/crew superstructure is actually built closer to scale than the older ISD. I never got the older ISD, but just got the new one and started my build today.

  • @theqilodge4607
    @theqilodge4607 5 лет назад +8

    I’m definitely going to buy this set👍🏽

  • @arcadius2569
    @arcadius2569 5 лет назад +1

    Seeing your room for the first time O_O! Awesome. It truly looks incredible. Those minifigure suggestions would've been awesome, and I'm liking the idea of a mini-interior. The mini-series' of Lego already shows the high quality deco they can achieve with smaller pieces. I'm glad that collectors can see an increase in quality alongside price, even if they don't agree with the price, as long as quality rises as well and doesn't stagnate than I don't have an issue with it.

  • @suupreem1299
    @suupreem1299 5 лет назад +9

    Will Smith be like:
    *aHhH tHaT'S hOt*
    *dAtS hOt*

  • @adamrichter4113
    @adamrichter4113 5 лет назад +1

    They should have made the trash chute thing in the back, (I doubt there is anything in there), and included a mini slave 1. Also they should of had a mini millennium falcon because of that scene where it lands behind the bridge to hide.

  • @Shadow0fd3ath24
    @Shadow0fd3ath24 5 лет назад +4

    it being so empty inside means a lot of people will try to make lighting kits i bet...especially with fiber optics

    • @is-null
      @is-null 5 лет назад

      That's what I was thinking. How could would the engines look lit up?

  • @Bijensap04
    @Bijensap04 5 лет назад

    19:10 also note that the pressure points are smaller on the falcon so that makes it look heavier on weighters

  • @1mnotfamous
    @1mnotfamous 5 лет назад +83

    You don’t care about the price cos you got it for free 😂😂

    • @quigondeathsound
      @quigondeathsound 5 лет назад +10

      I work at McDonalds and I'm buying it so

    • @HR-yd5ib
      @HR-yd5ib 5 лет назад +13

      @@quigondeathsound , explains why you work at McDonalds ;)

    • @darthbane2669
      @darthbane2669 5 лет назад +28

      @@HR-yd5ib That was a dick thing to say where do you work peasant?

    • @Webgobo
      @Webgobo 5 лет назад +2

      @@darthbane2669 no, it's just a logical joke... It's not smart to spend so much on Lego if you dont earn a lot of money. If you are not smart you have to work at MCD...

    • @mrpineapple3655
      @mrpineapple3655 5 лет назад +9

      InternetGoblin bruh most people first job is at mc d

  • @jackmanning1117
    @jackmanning1117 4 года назад +1

    I got this for Christmas yesterday and I’m so excited to finish building it! I’m done with the first 5 bags so far and it is absolutely humongous

    • @legitbot2432
      @legitbot2432 3 года назад

      was it a difficult build? or do u have no regrets and was it a fun enjoyable build

  • @rambonambo3510
    @rambonambo3510 5 лет назад +6

    I wasn’t too happy with the price, but after ur review I realize why the Star Destroyer is at $700. I’m a big Star Destroyer fan, I might consider getting this set. But I’ll wait to see if the price goes down.

    • @arpod1980
      @arpod1980 5 лет назад +1

      It won't unfortunately. These sets get retired after a certain time and will actually go up in price cause they will be hard to get after that. So if you want to get one, now would probably be better than later.

    • @mymightymocs7916
      @mymightymocs7916 5 лет назад

      I have a plug so I can get it for 50% off, but even these it's so expensive, I've moved onto gundam model kits, more bang for your buck than Lego

  • @deviss113789
    @deviss113789 5 лет назад +1

    I would like to see a conversion of the Devastator to become the Chimera. It would be very interesting to see how lego would do the design on the Hull of the ship for Grand Admiral Thrawn's Flagship.

  • @brickchangeproductions7478
    @brickchangeproductions7478 5 лет назад +19

    Your review is making me try to figure out how to afford this 🤣😩

    • @brianorozco1074
      @brianorozco1074 5 лет назад

      Brick Change Productions Have you ever collected coins?

    • @brickchangeproductions7478
      @brickchangeproductions7478 5 лет назад +2

      Brian Orozco I have not... might have to work another job 😬

    • @TidmouthSheds
      @TidmouthSheds 4 года назад +2

      Simple, make a popular RUclips channel and get Lego to sponsor you. Lol

  • @RookisaLego
    @RookisaLego 5 лет назад +2

    After the UCS Y-Wing I've certainly gained an interest in UCS sets in general. If I ever get the chance I'll definitely pick this one up.

  • @Freashskywalker
    @Freashskywalker 5 лет назад +6

    It looks like Star Wars
    David Haul, 2019 :D

  • @Montyh7
    @Montyh7 5 лет назад +1

    This is my favourite ship in the SW universe - and this Lego set is stunning.

  • @plank904
    @plank904 5 лет назад +3

    I just had a great idea for a moc. Fondor Shipyard

  • @michaelliegl5633
    @michaelliegl5633 4 года назад +2

    Why are there yellow blue and red bricks in this set though like seriously can someone explain this to me

    • @conner7684
      @conner7684 4 года назад

      If they were all the same color it would be harder to determine the difference and you would have to count more often it it’s a specific color it’s that size

  • @gabrielchan4420
    @gabrielchan4420 5 лет назад +11

    Doesn’t worth $700. If I get this for free like u do, I will try to sell it as well.

    • @yannisbaum1319
      @yannisbaum1319 5 лет назад +1

      true, it´s almost as expensive as the millenium falcon but much less pieces, only 2 figures and no interior

    • @jcw4969
      @jcw4969 5 лет назад +2

      This has a lot more bigger pieces, price per part doesn’t matter imo.

  • @VaderXBricks
    @VaderXBricks 5 лет назад +1

    Watching this review made me realize how much I actually wanna get this set in the future. Great video and review as always David!! :)

  • @fatsoweightwatcherer5935
    @fatsoweightwatcherer5935 5 лет назад +10

    Is there a room where you can Display it coming with it ?🤤🤤🤤

  • @arpod1980
    @arpod1980 5 лет назад

    I want this so bad. It's glorious! I have the millennium falcon and I look at that everyday. Lego is really upping their game with these UCS sets.