Chip ‘n Dale: Rescue Rangers Movie Reaction: I don't know what I expected but it wasn't Roger Rabbit
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 окт 2024
- Turns out Rescue Rangers might be a backdoor Who Framed Roger Rabbit sequel. That seems weird, but maybe not bad? Let's talk about it!
SUBSCRIBE for Disney cartoon reviews and more! www.youtube.com...
The Seaniccus Discord Server: / discord
Wanna see me ramble on some more? Check me out on Twitter: / seaniccus
This video is made by an adult fan of cartoons and animation for other adult fans of animation as analysis and commentary.
Music Credit:
Jazzy Frenchy, Royalty Free Music from Bensound
This could either be a surprise success or a major misfire.
If it's Alvin and the Chipmunks 2.0, I ain't watching it. But we'll see.
Exactly. It could be Roger Rabbit or Space Jam 2
I'd like for it to be a surprise success
@@JustChill0927 forgot loony toons back in action
@@spritemon98 That movie is just ok.
Am I the only one who heard David Tennant's voice when we briefly saw Scrooge in the trailer?
I think it's him too, but didn't catch it until I was editing!
I think they used archived recording of David Tennant because it is from DuckTales the 2017 reboot
@@1Soniccool but the design is more close to classic Scrooge over 2017 Scrooge. Maybe whoever edited that in was on a time crunch and used that recording without checking. Idk.
@@Yunone Yep it's the 1987 Scrooge!🦆💰💸👍
I really like the 3d render operation. It makes a lot of sense in the world
Ah, if they're doing a story about all the disney characters being actors then yeah, it would mess up the story about Chip & Dale not having worked together for years
How?
When I first read the synopsis I thought oh this sounds awful... but upon watching the trailer I was pleasantly surprised. I dont think it's what we really wanted... or needed... but it still seems fun and being self-referential helps. I mean it's already a kinda silly premise. As long as they respect the source material and don't just treat it as something that needs to be "fixed".
I feel like alot of meta humor continuations and reboots treat the originals as stupid.
I think this is why the DuckTales 2017 reboot is one of the only if not the only perfect reboots. It never treated the source material as silly or useless, in fact it often embraces it, quirks and all (even doing some meta humor about some of those quirks). The show isn't perfect, but not many shows can reach that level. But it's definitely a perfect reboot in my book. I hope the C&D movie is at least on some level the same way.
I did not know this movie existed, I’ll be honest
It was just shown yesterday
Rumors tend to be rumors until we see the final results
It's an interesting concept but the problem I have with the Who Framed Rodger Rabbit-ness of it, is that so much of the identity of that film was built around the love of animation as a medium...meanwhile this film is seemingly trying to pass of cell-shaded CGI as hand-drawn. If this wasn't a meta-commentary I wouldn't care but the jokes about CGI just calls back attention to it, and that it seems to be associating itself with WFRR, a film that pushed hand-drawn animation for the sake of the art, just makes it more uncomfortable. It just feels so shallow.
I'm guessing this is more of a financial limitations than anything else. Disney might have deep pockets but the higher ups allocates the money in them very carefully. They usually only seem to go all out on what they know will be a big blockbuster, their high priority projects like Star Wars, Marvel, Disney Animation, or of course their live action remakes. A movie based on Chip n Dale, especially with this premise likely didn't get as much love from the higherups as the filmmakers working on the project would've hoped. So this might just be their best compromise without hurting the original artistic vision too much.
@@drdewott9154 I could see that, however if that where the case it would be better not to call attention to it's own limitations by referencing a film like Roger Rabbit or mocking other CGI animation. The latter especially feels hypocritical.
@@gota7738 I don't think they're mocking it? As much as addressing it. The trailer doesn't show anybody being off put by the CGI, just the weird uncanny valley CGI peeps are the ones who are being at the most made fun of.
@@ralexcraft990 Just the jokes in general call attention to the fact that the "2D" is mostly also CGI, it undermines the joke. And yes, even with the uncanny valley jokes is that the cell-shaded CGI is weak enough to itself look off. Stones and glass houses.
@@gota7738 it looks nice tbh. I like cell shaded.
Love your "Ducktales 2017" shirt!
But yeah regarding this movie, I was never onboard with a live-action "Rescue Rangers" film from the start. Seeing this trailer was a little intriguing, but I'm not really excited about it. The whole setup feels much more like a fan-made parody trailer than an actual product, especially with how some of the 2D animation doesn't blend well with the live-action setting. I will admit though that I like the various cameos (especially Scrooge, Roger Rabbit, and Skat Kat) and the references to various forms of animation are nice. If I ever watch this movie, it'll be more out of curiosity than anything else.
I can't say I'm super excited either, but I am interested and curious. I don't think it looks like a fan film, though. It is odd. So very odd.
I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s a scene with Chip and Dale talking with Scrooge, (hopefully voiced by David Tennant), about reboots.
Well, considering that Scrooge still has his original design, maybe this movie is supposed to take place before the DuckTales reboot got made? Although somehow it also takes place after Ugly Sonic existed??
@@MiloMurphysLaw Considering it's set in the 90's ish, I don't think the reboot is getting addressed, and idk how old ugly sonic is.
I saw another reaction mentioned that the RR will have to rescue a cast member/friend and Gadget is missing from a lot of the trailer. In reality, there is/was a Gadget Cult somewhere in Russia. Perhaps a clue to where modern Gadget is in the movie?
The deeper voices on Chip and Dale may be a callback to how they recorded the original RR Chip and Dale: the voice actors were recorded speaking in their regular voices slower than normal, then the tape was sped up.
OH I see🤔
Can we talk about how it plays the “immortality” of art literally here? There’s like, 45 years between Who Framed Roger Rabbit (which takes place in 1947) and the ‘90s-set scenes of this Chip n‘ Dale movie. That is far longer than even any of the cartoons could’ve EXISTED in WFRR and Roger looks the same as he ever did
Unless Roger Rabbit is an actor, who played in Who framed Roger Rabbit in 1988.
Cartoons are immortal
Toons are immortal
It's gonna get double meta
@@seaniccus woooo
So that's what kind of movie it's supposed to be? I didn't know what to think. My brain just shut down the second I started watching the trailer.
Comedy adventure with commentary on the animation business and reboots.
I'm going to presume chip and dale characteristics will be the same, but the entire RR was a show.
So instead of a real reboot, we get a Roger Rabbit style parody?
God help them if they screw up Gadget. 😠
Yeah Russian Gadget cult will riot.
No did they not mess with Gadget
Bruh i am shocked QUACK!
Damn i have not watched you in a while. hope things are going well with the baby : )
The trailer actually makes me kinda excited for this movie now. I guess that’s the point of a movie trailer though
Hey there, Milo.
@@dr.heinzdoofenshmirtz7392 oh, hey Doof
Congratulations on your new baby! As for the trailer... I think this movie could turn out good, or it could turn out terrible, but either way it's got my attention. I can't believe there is a Rescue Rangers movie that features Roger Rabbit, the Mane Six from My Little Pony, and the cats from that one Cats movie. That is a thing that is happening that I never could have imagined outside of a fan fiction.
I was interested until I heard the voices and hard pass. Also Who Framed Roger Rabbit was an amazing movie and there is no way this will even come close to what it did and created.
The after credits scene had me screaming. I loved that scene. It’s a true Disney Afternoon fan treat.
It's ironic cause DW also had a meta commentary on reboots in DT17.
@@hunterlawrence3573 and there’s a rumor that they’re working on a DW reboot for Disney+
@@MiloMurphysLaw I’m pretty sure that’s confirmed. The question is whether it takes place in the same universe as Ducktales 2017
as a fan of Big Mouth it was a little jarring hearing "Andrew" as one of the munks but the trailer looked epic & I'm extremely excited to finally see the finished project once its out :)
Well from what I found, it’s in the same universe as WFRR and is the spiritual successor to that movie. All the toons that were designed by different companies all work in the real world but live in Toon Town, which would explain why G4 My Little Pony shows up in the trailer
"Like characters from *the Shrek movies* " dude, even though the humans from the Shrek movies looked realistic, they weren't hyper-realistic mo-cap abominations like something from Beowulf, The Polar Express or CATS, which is what the movie is parodying.
Eh, you're not wrong, unscripted that was the best example I had. Shrek was a technical triumph, but even at the time I thought it looked bad, including the humans -- but you're right that the movie is lambasting even worse examples. Shrek is still 85% uncanny valley to me though
@@seaniccus my suggestion, if you want to really go "even further beyond" with the uncanny non-mocap example, you could've probably chosen Toy Story. The Humans there look absolutely disgusting to me, by today's standards. Which is why the movie was about Toys because we can forgive the main characters for looking like plastic, because they are.
@@LizardOfOz69The humans do look truly awful in the first two Toy Story Movies, but to your original point, I don't think they were trying to "look real" in the "but felt wrong." aesthetic that's being parodied. Beowulf is a better example, you were right -- but I totally forgot about that movie while recording haha.
We've come a long way in 3D animation for sure.
@@seaniccus yeah, we sure did. I was just trying to follow your example, because I don't think the Shrek humans were going for that, either.
The idea that Chip and Dale are actors also reminds me of how Darkwing Duck was incorporated into Ducktales.
So, wait a minute. Is Darkwing Duck a tv show inside of a tv show inside of a movie?
Damn...!!! I cant believe they have roger rabbit
AWESOME REVIEW!😆
It's very weird 🤔that Chip and Dale don't have their usually voices from the original Chip 'N Dale: Rescue Rangers Series and what's even weirder that Dale is in GCI while Chip isn't, I mean what are the writers and producer of this upcoming movie thinking.
Are you going to do another video on the movie
I had not been following the news about this movie. When I saw the trailer I wasn’t sure where it was going but suddenly I had the thought “Oh, it’s Galaxy Quest!” then I was very on board.
Two Disney news came on the same day: this movie trailer and "Storyliving." Look it up. Disney has announced new home communities. They want their ideas, their magic, to come to life. 2D to 3D
Getting sick of people praising this with the constant, “Roger Rabbit nonsense.” Roger Rabbit may have had characters from different franchises making cameos as part of a subplot for self aware toons, but it primarily had it’s own ORIGINAL CHARACTERS (I.e Roger, Jessica, talking baby, weasels, taxi car) to drive THE REAL STORY of that movie . Instead, this film just RANDOMLY choose an existing franchise (Chip’N Dale: Rescue Rangers) for this story, makes no sense to me.
The first time anyone ever heard of the movie title of “Who Framed Roger Rabbit?” back in the day, no one knew what to expect from story. In the case of the movie title “CHIP ‘N DALE: RESCUE RANGERS,”however, in my most completely certain opinion, we definitely should not have gotten to this kind of story AT ALL. So no, this movie will probably be trash
There is an already established series made by Disney that deals with cartoon-self-awareness called “Bonkers,” so I don’t know why the hell they RANDOMLY decided to tell this story with Chip ‘N Dale
Probably because people have mostly fond memories of Rescue Rangers (7.6 on IMDb), while Bonkers, that I'm sure still had its fans, is remembered less fondly, or not remembered at all (6.7 on IMDb). Also, the Rescue Rangers video game is considered a classic and an NES-gem, while I didn't even know Bonkers had a video game (for the SNES) until a couple of years ago.
So in short, CnD: RR is a stronger brand with more goodwill and name-recognition than Bonkers, so from a financial stand-point it makes more sense to make a Rescue Rangers film than a Bonkers one.
Missed you man Keep the content coming!
Made dude come out of hiding for a year. LoL
Aye congrats on baby!!!!🥳🥳
I never expected mlp to be in the trailer
I think I would have liked the trailer more if Chip and Dale sounded more like, you know, Chip and Dale. The voice of John Mullany on Chip is just so off and strange.
Hey friend, happy you're doing videos again. Hope you and the family are well. Oh, and one more thing.... Senior millennials... 😉
I'm annoyed that they cant get the actual voice actors to voice their cartoon characters on the big screen
Let's be fair, to make the chipmunks sound like they do.. they had to do a lot of nonsense. Talk slow and deep.. then speed it up with a higher pitch. No one has time for that
They have Tress and Cory Burton but he is doing the voice of Zipper
Yeah I too am of mixed opinions on this project. On the one hand my favorite Disney Saturday morning cartoon is back but on the other hand it looks to be a parody to generate money and try to be a spiritual successor to WFRR. I just pray that the story is good but I've been burned way too often by corporate "entertainment".
😕😕😕
They basically blend the concepts from roger rabbit and galaxy quest... And I'm looking forward to it.
they did the same thing with Garfield, where he's an aging has-been that hates his old movies. I'm like...why? Are Hollywood types projecting their own middle-age trauma on friggin' KIDS' CARtOONS and why'd anyone be interested in that? Make some artsy film called "Once upon a time on Hollywood" or something.
I'm not a fan. Meta-Rescue Rangers is not Rescue Rangers. Mystery actors "solving mysteries for real" is a gimmick, and it's fine. The big problem is that it's Galaxy Quest, not Star Trek; but people like Star Trek.
Actually, when I whatch the trailer, I've find it really bad like... This movie is gonna be shitty.
But... now I've whatch your video, maybe this film can be interesting.
Roger Rabbit's movie was really good in fact.
(But RR was not. This show was so bad and so so racist, yikes.)
I'm gonna give a chance to this movie. We'll see.
They should have made this Roger Rabbit 2 instead of a Rescue Rangers movie. While the movie looks interesting it really looks like it has nothing to do with Rescue Rangers, like the main characters feel like they could have been interchangable with any 80s/90s franchise.
Noooooo Roger Rabbit does not need a sequel at all it is classic the way it is
It doesn’t need a sequel. Also the guy who played Eddie is dead😶
Roger Rabbit would fit this movie way better than Rescue Rangers.
Going off the trailer it feels like such a random pick. While Roger Rabbit doesn't need to be a direct sequel just a washed up cartoon star trying to find his way in this modern world.
Lemme find out this is unofficially sequel to Roger Rabbit 30 plus years later. 🎤👀. Edited: he literally said what I said, that's the vibes this trailer gave me after rewatching it, I'm hella excited, I always wanted a Roger Rabbit 2. I wonder who plays Gadget, Zendaya has that adorkable vibe down very well, she would be a good choice. I hope this leads to a tv series.
Congratulations on being a father! Maybe if it’s okay with your wife maybe you can do some family videos. Show your followers you and your daughter in some activities
I loved it. It was weird... So weird. But, yeah, absolutely a spiritual successor to Roger Rabbit. I could see this being the RR universe, just in modern times.
To make a really good reboot of a series, one must understand what made that original so beloved. When you saw the advertisement for DuckTales 2017, you understood that the creators were the children of the 1987-1990 generation who had kept the child spirit alive and at the same time kept up to date on that changing media landscape. I have none of those feelings when I see Rescue Rangers 2022.
Roger Rabbit is my favorite childhood movie so this concept _should_ make me happy. It just made me sigh.
I was hoping for a modern C&D adventure, not a meta commentary. I'm still willing to watch it but my expectations are in the gutter right now.
Hey once you’re rewatching with your daughter you’ll be back in full effect! You can do it ! Congratulations
The story is about Chip and Dale not working together after the show ended but there is something going on that there is video piracy like pirate the TV show or any movie that Disney owns without give them money. And they don't have Gadget with them but she is there when they worked on the show but she is missing and Monterrey Jack is addicted to cheese. Chip works a normal job while Dale works at a convention that has everything people reminisced thier childhood and so that is why Dale is in the CG animation because he wanted to be fresh without looking old. So they go on a mystery to find the person who is behind it.
I don't know how to feel. The humour seems diluted Sausage party, the voices do not work (people hear them ever day in the parks) and it just seems awfully meta. It also doesn't make any sense because Chip and Dale existed for decades before rescue rangers.
I wouldn't compare this to Roger Rabbit.
This is more like space jam 2, and not in a good way.
Well this New Chip n Dale movie could be the Next Roger Rabbit for this generation
I’m not sure how to feel about this. I mean this is my favorite Disney afternoon show. But it really bothers me that they won’t have their chipmunk voices. Why?!
I guess the idea is when they star in cartoons they have the high pitched voices when sped up
🔥🔥🔥💜Content. Do not waste another day = P-R-O-M-O-S-M !
I had no idea about this movie coming out. I don't like the idea of Adam Sandler voicing one of the characters.
Hey sean maybe you could do a video on the comics and books on the shelf behind you, maybe another on the toys. Maybe another on whether you think the reboot ducktales comics are any good or how the old ones were or how the old disney adventure ducktalkes comics were.
A while back I saw a news report that described the movie would be live-action, take place in disneyland/disney studios, where the characters from all the animated movies just happened to live, main cast would be 2D, and the plot would be Chip and Dale teaming up with a live-action human to solve a crime. So I kind of knew to expect a Roger Rabbit -like film
But my God, WHY did they feel the need to change the voices?
I wanted darkwing duck to have his own show again >-
Welp, at first I thought “oh god what have we done?”
Now... SO. GLAD. I have Disney+.
By the way, congrats on the baby!
The movie does interests me on a personal nostalgia level. I wasn’t necessarily the biggest Rescue Rangers fan, but the notion of directly bringing it back has me somewhat intrigued. I’m a sucker for these animated live action hybrids where all sorts of obscure classic old cartoons exists in the real world. Not feeling the comedy from the trailer, and the voices of the chipmunks themselves, but I’m sure it’ll have very cool cameos, references at least.
Disney just not said yet if a Gummi Bears or Gargoyles revival is in the works
Aye your still alive
But now he is a dad
What you said about the Rescue Rangers characters being off limits to the producers of DuckTales 2017 might explain why characters from other Disney Afternoon shows, like the Manhattan Clan and the Gummies of Gummi Glen never appeared. Disney is considering reviving Gargoyles and Gummi Bears, so those characters were a no go for Frank Angones. That explains why he was only able to work in Manny turning into a gargoyle and the theme song as well as having Black Heron attend an auction to bid on a page from the Great Book Of Gummi and reciting the recipe for Gummi Berry Juice.
Did you accidentally say "Adam Sandler" instead of Andy Samberg the first time, or was that an accent thing?
Some fans hate Della could you maybe do a video on? this if you want.
So set expectations low, so anything not terrible will be alright?
😔I'm a little disappointed with the trailer.
I think everyone was expecting Rescue Rangers to be either like G-Force or the live action Smurfs movies
Congratulations on the new baby!
Thank you!!
Congrats on the kid, man
If this movie does well, I can still see either Roger Rabbit or Skat Kat making a newer stand alone comeback movie.
Now that I'd love to see. Especially because it could re-ignite the interest in Toontown. If it succeeds and they're smart they'd revamp their old MMO of the same name and this time have Roger Rabbit actually present in the game. Basically free money at that point 😛
@@santosic Just along as It's not lie Marry Poppins Return; acting both a true continuation, but still reharsh from the ground up counting as It's own personal reboot. I wanna still see something original then recycled as a depressant cash-grab or be like Ralph Breaks The Internet of just being meh.
Whhaaat? Disney actually giving fans who are born in the 80s and 90s something they want? None of that "oh it is not meant for you" crap saying it is only for the kids. But still blames us some how that their movies or shows bombed because of us ruining it for not buying their tickets or seeing it on stream while buying their merch? *sarcastic truth tone* I don't know how I feel about this movie, but hearing that the people making this movie for the fans that grew up with the show is shocking.
I mean I don't know if it's made "for us" in spirit, but I think we're the target demographic.
I think I'll wait for the reviews before I see this.
I prefer just calling it CG vs hand-drawn instead of using the dimension paradigm
Not wrong.
Except this "2D animation" is also 3D in this movie so hahaha
Congratulations on your daughter bro
the trailer for this movie plaid before your video. I thought it was part of your video.
hahaha that's perfect, and amazing
This looks godawful
Your top is really cool🙂
Geriatric???!!!!! Excuse you? I'm 37 year YOUNG, thank you very much! 😤 Keep talking like that and you're gonna find yourself on the wrong end of my cane, boy!
Man try consulting for pregnancy these days. "Geriatric pregnancy" is a weird combo of words and my wife did not like it
@@seaniccus 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I can see why
Congrats on the baby 👶
I was hoping for an actual Rescue Rangers movie.
But we got one staring Vin Diesel
i'm with ya
YOU LIIIIVEEE
It’s Andy Samburg, not Adam Sandler
I totally said or tried to say Samburg. Did I slur my speech? I was very tired when I recorded that
Honestly, I'm actually excited about this. It might not be the most compelling story-wise, but I feel like it will be funny and have good humor
I'm going to be completely honest. I had no idea this movie was happening. I didn't know of its existence until this video appeared on my feed. When I clicked it, it gave me the trailer to the movie, so I knew exactly what was going on by that point.
Talking about the actual movie, I feel like Who Framed Roger Rabbit still holds up. I watched it very recently, within the last month, with my wife who was watching it for the first time and we both loved it. If this movie follows similar logic I think it should be good and age well. I like that they are making fun of different animation styles so even if they do create better later, this is something to look back on as what it took to get to that point. I am very curious to see how this goes though it won't really be Chip and Dale solving mysteries in a movie unless this really goes in the WFRR direction of Toons needing to solve a real life mystery, which would be cool but this is also Disney + so we can't expect them to solve a murder or something.
But a movie like this could potentially open the door for a Gummi Bears or Gargoyles revival
To be honest this feels like two producers went out golfing, WB producer said to a Disney one, where almost finished putting out space jam 2 and going to have everything in it all of our properties. The executive walked into a room and says what do we have that we can use to do this. Just as the animation staff walked in and said amusement park! God is a still better than the AI universe where the plot is super flimsy and doesn't have any understanding! They had to go visit the DC universe twice with two different methods! South Park was right, we are in the darkest timeline! (There's a 50% chance this movie might be good)
Also I’ve recently started watching the rescue Rangers on Disney +
🧡
Um so I saw the trailer yesterday: confused but intrigued
It’s like someone got assigned one of those Smurf type movies and decided to address every issue those movies have and also make a love letter to Roger Rabbit.
I still think they should make a reboot of House of Mouse with all the modern versions of the classic characters and also new characters like Phineas and Ferb
5:13 “Adam Sandler”?
No, I say Adam Samburg there, but my diction isn't the best, but I just listened to it again just now
Good Luck with your baby. And good to have you back, if only for a moment.
Geriatric millennials ? I think you mean Gen-X
No it's totally a different thing haha. The range for millennial is like 20 years, it's wild.
When you get to dividing like between the oldest millennials and the youngest gen-xers a lot of people get salty about which arbitrary group they identify with.
Which is inderst because "gen x" was def cooler.
@@seaniccus wait…..I’m gonna be 24 this year….so do I count? The generation words always confuses me😅 I’m a…’98 kid’
John Mulaney did do a great va job as Peter Porker though.
I have a lot on my mind about this movie and all of it is feelings of confusion.