No it’s not, it adds more layers of effects to the documentary; especially one of this subject. There are plenty of vanilla , overly dry JTR documentaries already in circulation at this point
@@nunya___you sound like real fun at parties. They're obviously trying to create something that straddles the line between information and entertainment. There's nothing wrong with that, and applying the term " sad" to it makes no sense at all. It's not your taste, move on, stop being arbitrarily hostile.
@@xposhboyx Are you are one of those people that can't abide someone having an opinion other than your own? Or do you not comprehend the purpose of a comments section? So sad.
@@nunya___I'm in the comment section and I'm commenting that your comment is stupid why are you out here trying to police videos to make sure they have no music 🤣 (Although, in fairness, I will admit the music is too intense.)
I really enjoyed this documentary 👏👏👏lots of new information i didn't know and ive watched alot of jack the ripper documentaries. Of course IF I did have a criticism which i haven't, I would have made it more constructive than "is that it! Geezzz?"🙄🙄🙄
Nice cinamatics but short on facts first 10 minutes Charles Cross/Lechmere was found by Robert Paul "standing where the woman was" quoted from his inquest statement. So they didn't arrive together or know each other and they did find pc Mizen and Cross/Lechmere informed him that he was needed in Bucks Row.
There are reasons that hint towards it being Lechmere - primarily relating to the Polly Nichols murder - but there are also reasons why it doesn’t add up for it to be him. Why did he stop? He didn’t move away from the area, and serial killers never quit without a reason e.g. their own death or capture. What was his motive?
@@Tellhimhesdead-m1y Or Zodiac. Or BTK (though he said he was considering/planned returning to the craft, afaik). People are so overconfident in their assessments.
@@JenniferMacdonald-f9i Because it was only his DNA found and nobody else. It's 90% certain it was Aaron Kosminksi. He was a Polish Jew. It was likely to be him who wrote on the wall " The Jews won't be blamed for nothing"
i am not a ripperologist at all, but it seems the killer had intimate knowledge of the street layout, the people, and as a cops on the beat, would have known the inhabitants, rather well. there must have been some level of trust between the police and the general public. why did no one ever suspect a cop as the ripper?
Haven't watched the documentary but check "JTR:The Missing Evidence" (best viewed on Daily Motion). Everything else is bogus when it comes to discussing suspects or rather, who might be JTR.
first off i have been studying serial murder and forensics for years and after seeing what has been done to this case over the years it made me mad because i do not think it's right that people make money off the victims of crime unless it's been solved or they solve it. that being said myself and a few other researched this case to find the killer and solve the case but we are doing it to stop the greed of man. I did a lot of research on this case learning about the areas, the lighting, the weather at the time of the murders things like that i knew that i could not use anything but the facts of the case and then use the tools of today in order to find the ripper. believe it or not it was not hard to find the ripper. The reason police back then did not find him is because they had no idea what a serial killer was or how to catch one. He was right under their nose just as he said he was. now i will tell you why i would be ranting and that is because the reason this case is not solved is because the authors, newspaper writers and armchair detectives do not have the skill or the know how to find a serial killer and through the years they have written books and added suspects that have nothing to do with the case and they added stuff to sell their books so they have muddied the waters a lot just to make money and another sad thing is even ex detectives have jumped on the money wagon. anyway, as i said i found Jack the ripper he was a man named George Hutchinson we are 100% sure on this, he fits in every way to what we know as a lust killer. He lived on Commercial and Wentworth Street right in the middle of all the murders, he knew the area well, he saw the victims every day, He even knew two of the victims this is very important because a lust killer will try and target victims, they do not know but if they do kill a known victim, they will always cover or destroy the face and sometimes the whole body to depersonalize the victim. we also believe that he only wrote two of the letters, the first letter that was sent came on Sept 17th and he gave his trade name, he also sent the from hell letter and it was not sent to a surgeon it was sent to Mr. Lusk who was head of the vigilance committee. this was a sex crime but Jack never has sex with the victims so his DNA would not be found on the victims. Jacks Penis was his knife. as for the shall they say was Kate Eddowes well that can't be proved and even if it was i am sure you would find lots of different DNA on it as most of the victims only had the clothes on their backs. we would never know this man's name had it not been for a lady named Sara Lewis who saw him standing across from that opening you showed leading to Mary Kelly's flat at 2 a.m. as she was going to her friends flat. after George learned he had been seen it had been three days since the murder and the inquest had just ended it was enough to scare him into making a statement to police as to why he was there. in this statement we found all kinds of red flags. the one thing that usually gets serial killers caught is their EGO and we see his ego in this statement it shows he has been listening to what was being written and talked about. at the start of the murders people were blaming a Jew and that is why he wrote the message on the wall. He also brings up that a man gave Mary Kelly a handkerchief and made sure to say it was red he says that because when he was seen talking to Kate Eddowes the witness said he was dressed as a sailor and had on a red handkerchief. Then they were saying the killer was a rich toff down slumming, so he tells of seeing this well-dressed man with Mary Kelly after Mary had asked to barrow money from him and he told her he had none. he tells how well dressed this guy was and he was very detailed he even said the man had a large gold pocket watch on a gold chain with a red stone. now you should see this red flag as you brought up that Mary lived on the most dangerous street in all of London, the police would only go down that street in groups of three.no man in his right mind would let that gold watch be seen as he would have been mugged. George said he knew Mary and had given her money before now if you knew a person and you were the last person to see them and then find out they had been killed by a killer all of London was looking for you would be running to police but not George he only came forward three days after the murder when he heard he was seen. We believe George was out hunting that night but had to stick close to home because of all the police out looking for him and he was getting worried he would not be able to get a victim until Mary came up and asked him for money, now on a normal day this would not have bothered him as his victims were older drunk women Mary was 25 and pretty she was in the wrong place at the wrong time. he stalked her waited until the coast was clear and made his move. We also believe he killed a lot more than 5 we think he not only killed the 11 others but also was the torso killer. We are trying to find where he went when he left London in 1891 when the murders stopped when we find him, we will then look for new victims as he would not have stopped killing once we find them, we will then link him to one or more and that will be enough for the courts and the world. we will never write any books or movies or documentaries because we did this for the victims and their families and to stop the greed.
@@cb8199 Well Jeez, if you would read what i wrote and have been writing you would know that the whole point of us researching this case was to find the ripper and we did, now we are hunting down where he went when he left London in 1891 once we do that we will find new murders and once we link him to a new murder it will be enough for the courts to prove he was the ripper and the case will be closed. and as i have said many times there will be NO books or movies, we did this for the victims and their families, and we do not want any money or fame for doing what should have been done a long time ago.
and he said yes i would have had to kill him that's pretty cold@@nickd4310 yes there are a few cases like this. i don't know how close you mean when you say close. Gary Ridgway the green river killer had his son with him when he picked up a girl took her to the woods and killed her as his son waited in the car, they asked him what he would have done had his son went to look for him and saw him kill the girl he said yes i would have killed him. that's pretty damn cold in my book.
@@cb8199 sorry this is the closest i will get to a book as one reason i looked into this case was to stop the scum authors from muddying the waters any more than they have. I want the victims and their families to get justice not watch people who are not qualified to add their own suspects and crap to make them seem to fit the killer. i find it real sad when an author is treated and looked Apon as a detective, yet a Qualified person tells them something and they believe the author is smarter than they are.
These guys need to google "overproduced" - I bailed at the 6 minute mark.
Thank you so much for this. Love the unique way you've presented it. ❤️
We could have done without the music. It was so unnecessary and spoiled the entire video.
@@jacobrivers5728 maybe for you it did but whatever 🤷🏼♂️
It's sad when people add music and overly-dramatic style that ruins a good documentary. It's not a superhero movie.
No it’s not, it adds more layers of effects to the documentary; especially one of this subject. There are plenty of vanilla , overly dry JTR documentaries already in circulation at this point
@@alanndrake2619 Yes, it is. This is a documentary not an ogre...documentaries _don't_ have layers Donkey.
@@nunya___you sound like real fun at parties.
They're obviously trying to create something that straddles the line between information and entertainment. There's nothing wrong with that, and applying the term " sad" to it makes no sense at all. It's not your taste, move on, stop being arbitrarily hostile.
@@xposhboyx Are you are one of those people that can't abide someone having an opinion other than your own? Or do you not comprehend the purpose of a comments section? So sad.
@@nunya___I'm in the comment section and I'm commenting that your comment is stupid
why are you out here trying to police videos to make sure they have no music 🤣
(Although, in fairness, I will admit the music is too intense.)
I was only 9 yo when Jack The Ripper was terrorizing the streets. I was so scared to stay out past 9pm.
There’s only one thing absolutely certain about Jack the Ripper now….he’s long since been dead for many decades! Rest in HELL…
I really enjoyed this documentary 👏👏👏lots of new information i didn't know and ive watched alot of jack the ripper documentaries.
Of course IF I did have a criticism which i haven't, I would have made it more constructive than "is that it! Geezzz?"🙄🙄🙄
I look forward to the day that you can turn the music off!
2 mins in and the music is dreadful
Ridiculous music, had to turn it off
I agree couldn’t watch due to the music not for me
Nice cinamatics but short on facts first 10 minutes Charles Cross/Lechmere was found by Robert Paul "standing where the woman was" quoted from his inquest statement. So they didn't arrive together or know each other and they did find pc Mizen and Cross/Lechmere informed him that he was needed in Bucks Row.
Hey, I've wrote my Book as I think I know who he was, and put a Video on here; it's called- 'Jack The Ripper Spells It Out!'
Charles cross aka Charles Allen Lechmere was jack the ripper as revealed by Edward Stowe on his house of Lechmere RUclips channel.
There are reasons that hint towards it being Lechmere - primarily relating to the Polly Nichols murder - but there are also reasons why it doesn’t add up for it to be him.
Why did he stop? He didn’t move away from the area, and serial killers never quit without a reason e.g. their own death or capture. What was his motive?
Police said only 5 but there are 11 whitechapel murders
@@NJ-pu4dt Serial killers do quit. For one, Di Angelo in California stopped in the 80s but wasn`t caught until about 2018.
@@Tellhimhesdead-m1y Or Zodiac. Or BTK (though he said he was considering/planned returning to the craft, afaik). People are so overconfident in their assessments.
Jack the Ripper was not a solitary killer.
Aaron Kosminksi worked alone. It was only his DNA they found.
How do you know
@@JenniferMacdonald-f9i Because it was only his DNA found and nobody else. It's 90% certain it was Aaron Kosminksi. He was a Polish Jew. It was likely to be him who wrote on the wall " The Jews won't be blamed for nothing"
i am not a ripperologist at all, but it seems the killer had intimate knowledge of the street layout, the people, and as a cops on the beat, would have known the inhabitants, rather well. there must have been some level of trust between the police and the general public. why did no one ever suspect a cop as the ripper?
That's IT ????
Geeezzz
Haven't watched the documentary but check "JTR:The Missing Evidence" (best viewed on Daily Motion). Everything else is bogus when it comes to discussing suspects or rather, who might be JTR.
first off i have been studying serial murder and forensics for years and after seeing what has been done to this case over the years it made me mad because i do not think it's right that people make money off the victims of crime unless it's been solved or they solve it. that being said myself and a few other researched this case to find the killer and solve the case but we are doing it to stop the greed of man. I did a lot of research on this case learning about the areas, the lighting, the weather at the time of the murders things like that i knew that i could not use anything but the facts of the case and then use the tools of today in order to find the ripper. believe it or not it was not hard to find the ripper. The reason police back then did not find him is because they had no idea what a serial killer was or how to catch one. He was right under their nose just as he said he was. now i will tell you why i would be ranting and that is because the reason this case is not solved is because the authors, newspaper writers and armchair detectives do not have the skill or the know how to find a serial killer and through the years they have written books and added suspects that have nothing to do with the case and they added stuff to sell their books so they have muddied the waters a lot just to make money and another sad thing is even ex detectives have jumped on the money wagon. anyway, as i said i found Jack the ripper he was a man named George Hutchinson we are 100% sure on this, he fits in every way to what we know as a lust killer. He lived on Commercial and Wentworth Street right in the middle of all the murders, he knew the area well, he saw the victims every day, He even knew two of the victims this is very important because a lust killer will try and target victims, they do not know but if they do kill a known victim, they will always cover or destroy the face and sometimes the whole body to depersonalize the victim. we also believe that he only wrote two of the letters, the first letter that was sent came on Sept 17th and he gave his trade name, he also sent the from hell letter and it was not sent to a surgeon it was sent to Mr. Lusk who was head of the vigilance committee. this was a sex crime but Jack never has sex with the victims so his DNA would not be found on the victims. Jacks Penis was his knife. as for the shall they say was Kate Eddowes well that can't be proved and even if it was i am sure you would find lots of different DNA on it as most of the victims only had the clothes on their backs. we would never know this man's name had it not been for a lady named Sara Lewis who saw him standing across from that opening you showed leading to Mary Kelly's flat at 2 a.m. as she was going to her friends flat. after George learned he had been seen it had been three days since the murder and the inquest had just ended it was enough to scare him into making a statement to police as to why he was there. in this statement we found all kinds of red flags. the one thing that usually gets serial killers caught is their EGO and we see his ego in this statement it shows he has been listening to what was being written and talked about. at the start of the murders people were blaming a Jew and that is why he wrote the message on the wall. He also brings up that a man gave Mary Kelly a handkerchief and made sure to say it was red he says that because when he was seen talking to Kate Eddowes the witness said he was dressed as a sailor and had on a red handkerchief. Then they were saying the killer was a rich toff down slumming, so he tells of seeing this well-dressed man with Mary Kelly after Mary had asked to barrow money from him and he told her he had none. he tells how well dressed this guy was and he was very detailed he even said the man had a large gold pocket watch on a gold chain with a red stone. now you should see this red flag as you brought up that Mary lived on the most dangerous street in all of London, the police would only go down that street in groups of three.no man in his right mind would let that gold watch be seen as he would have been mugged. George said he knew Mary and had given her money before now if you knew a person and you were the last person to see them and then find out they had been killed by a killer all of London was looking for you would be running to police but not George he only came forward three days after the murder when he heard he was seen. We believe George was out hunting that night but had to stick close to home because of all the police out looking for him and he was getting worried he would not be able to get a victim until Mary came up and asked him for money, now on a normal day this would not have bothered him as his victims were older drunk women Mary was 25 and pretty she was in the wrong place at the wrong time. he stalked her waited until the coast was clear and made his move. We also believe he killed a lot more than 5 we think he not only killed the 11 others but also was the torso killer. We are trying to find where he went when he left London in 1891 when the murders stopped when we find him, we will then look for new victims as he would not have stopped killing once we find them, we will then link him to one or more and that will be enough for the courts and the world. we will never write any books or movies or documentaries because we did this for the victims and their families and to stop the greed.
Jeez, i thought you were writing a book 😳
@@cb8199 Well Jeez, if you would read what i wrote and have been writing you would know that the whole point of us researching this case was to find the ripper and we did, now we are hunting down where he went when he left London in 1891 once we do that we will find new murders and once we link him to a new murder it will be enough for the courts to prove he was the ripper and the case will be closed. and as i have said many times there will be NO books or movies, we did this for the victims and their families, and we do not want any money or fame for doing what should have been done a long time ago.
Can you think of another case where someone's body was treated this way by a close acquaintance?
and he said yes i would have had to kill him that's pretty cold@@nickd4310 yes there are a few cases like this. i don't know how close you mean when you say close. Gary Ridgway the green river killer had his son with him when he picked up a girl took her to the woods and killed her as his son waited in the car, they asked him what he would have done had his son went to look for him and saw him kill the girl he said yes i would have killed him. that's pretty damn cold in my book.
@@cb8199 sorry this is the closest i will get to a book as one reason i looked into this case was to stop the scum authors from muddying the waters any more than they have. I want the victims and their families to get justice not watch people who are not qualified to add their own suspects and crap to make them seem to fit the killer. i find it real sad when an author is treated and looked Apon as a detective, yet a Qualified person tells them something and they believe the author is smarter than they are.