U.S. Marines New Amphibious Combat Vehicle With 30mm Cannon

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 дек 2024

Комментарии • 146

  • @tomc8384
    @tomc8384 Год назад +26

    It’s based on the Italian IVECO DV SuperAV (same mechanics of centauro II and vbm freccia). AVCs are produced by BAE Systems on licence IVECO DV

    • @EllaVloggs
      @EllaVloggs Год назад

      SUPER

    • @RusselHustle
      @RusselHustle 11 месяцев назад

      shit i don't know, maybe this cheaper than EFV

    • @SeaJay_Oceans
      @SeaJay_Oceans 10 месяцев назад

      USA needs another 1 million troops if it thinks it will go to war with China...

    • @parusol235
      @parusol235 4 месяца назад

      @@RusselHustleIt’s not, in all honesty and from talking to ACV crewmen when they first started hitting the fleet these vics have superior flat ground/road mobility with a multitude of sensors/cameras for enhanced survivability, and has a v shaped hull that has overall better protection than an AAV alongside with being future proofed for addons that could be implemented. However the AAV beats it in rough terrain, swims better and a larger troop/cargo capacity. The ACV is also extremely cramped as a dismount and the ramp on the back of them is extremely tall owing to it having a v shaped hull, these things also have a tendency to topple over if a rogue wave hits on certain sea states which is why the AAV is still being retained. If the EFV ever came back that would’ve been the perfect “supplement then replace” sort of vehicle for both the AAV and the ACV but unfortunately the Corps is no longer invested into large scale, long term projects and is more or less looking at COTS/commercial off the shelf options for both cost saving measures and trying to expedite/rapidly field new equipment because of Force Design 2030 and to rapidly counter new found threats in the modern day as quickly as possible.

  • @Eric-lq6yk
    @Eric-lq6yk 9 месяцев назад +8

    So its basically a water proofed and ligter version of the army striker?

    • @KevinBYee
      @KevinBYee 24 дня назад

      In role, maybe. But it's based on a entirely different platform and I think is larger in general.

  • @rockytorres958
    @rockytorres958 10 месяцев назад +8

    while traversing the sea between amphib ship & shore the ship should provide anti air cover. this acv should have an anti drone or air defense devise for troop protection.

  • @robertoorsi5771
    @robertoorsi5771 6 месяцев назад +5

    It's a BAE System Production. It is not based on Stryker, but on IVECO 8 x 8 that is bigger then Stryker.

  • @WaVeTECH-b9z
    @WaVeTECH-b9z 16 дней назад

    The engineering excellence in these vehicles is absolutely breathtaking!

  • @ivan200804
    @ivan200804 11 месяцев назад +11

    Its looking more and more like that APC in "Aliens."

    • @Archvile-h5q
      @Archvile-h5q 10 месяцев назад +2

      Just another "bug" hunt!

    • @warweasel2832
      @warweasel2832 6 месяцев назад +2

      Considering the marines' penchant for holding on to old equipment to the last possible moment, I wouldn't be at all surprised if the Marines were using this in 2122 on Mars, just with a better atmospheric system block upgrade.

  • @trevor21241842
    @trevor21241842 11 месяцев назад +6

    It just has to be able to not sink lol anything other than that is a plus. It doesn’t have to be fast it just has to work

  • @williambarnebee40
    @williambarnebee40 11 месяцев назад +4

    YAT-YAS!!!

  • @JasonMiller-rg8md1
    @JasonMiller-rg8md1 6 месяцев назад +2

    Every west coast 0311 recognizes that beach.

  • @Heretowatchstuff
    @Heretowatchstuff 10 месяцев назад +1

    4:46 wow. Watching them getting dogged down brings back memories. “Set condition one alpha throughout the ship.” Filling out manifests for my squad. The smell of the well deck. We were still using AAVs when I was in though. A MK-40 and a 50 cal on the turret. Hopefully these have bigger benches inside though. With all your gear on, your ass was hardly touching anything. And we’d spend hours sitting all squeezed in back there. Breathing all the diesel exhaust. Not seeing anything. Sure beat walking though. Boats or helo companies had to walk from the LZ or the shore/river. The few times I got to sit in the TC hatches were pretty cool though. Especially just after splashing.

  • @tmac4usmc1
    @tmac4usmc1 11 месяцев назад +3

    Will the 30 mm variation be part of future LAR battalions? Replacing the. LAV 25 I assume?

    • @coolbreeze2.0-mortemadfasc13
      @coolbreeze2.0-mortemadfasc13 11 месяцев назад +4

      No, the ARV is the planned replacement for the LAV-25. Separate vehicle.

    • @onseki1774
      @onseki1774 10 месяцев назад

      If I had to guess, it will probably have the same 30mm unmanned turret. I will miss those goofy frogs with the Detroit 6V53T whenever they go away

  • @deltasource56
    @deltasource56 5 месяцев назад

    how will the tires do on coral?

  • @mj-np9sy
    @mj-np9sy 8 месяцев назад

    What sort of additional maintenance do these require post-traversal of a body of water? Do they need to be put into amphibious mode or are they always in it?

  • @TypeRyRy
    @TypeRyRy Год назад +1

    Is there a reason the RCWS is mounted directly behind the engine snorkel?

    • @EllaVloggs
      @EllaVloggs Год назад +1

      ALRIGHT

    • @dewdew80
      @dewdew80 11 месяцев назад

      are you talking about the periscope? Because it looks like the air intake might be further back and to the left of the gun. I imagine the periscope being located in line with the gun probably helps with spotting and lining up targets.

  • @antikoerper256
    @antikoerper256 10 месяцев назад +1

    Love this machine! Much love from your humble NATO ally - Bulgaria

  • @scotttobiassen22
    @scotttobiassen22 10 дней назад

    sorry, as an AVTB testing officer, this is not a replacement to the AAV and has very limited amphibious capabilities. This is a river crosser only. USMC is going down the wrong bunny trail with this and the CMC's vision for the future.

  • @christopherwang4392
    @christopherwang4392 11 месяцев назад +2

    If the ACV / SuperAV 8x8 wheeled chassis is large enough to carry the three-man turret of the US Army's M10 Booker, maybe it could replace the now-retired M1128 Mobile Gun System.

    • @CorePathway
      @CorePathway 11 месяцев назад

      MGS needed a 120mm mortar-gun, not a high velocity 105. Direct fire? Check. Indirect? Check.

    • @CCM1199
      @CCM1199 11 месяцев назад

      ​@@CorePathwaythe Stryker already has an IDF version in service. The M1128 retired and confirmed that no replacement will take the 1128's place. Not even the M10 booker.

  • @drbendover7467
    @drbendover7467 Год назад +2

    Send the old ones to my place:)

  • @CheerfulTerrier-xe6nn
    @CheerfulTerrier-xe6nn 10 месяцев назад

    I can see this vehicle as w.orking in concert with lars..,...Lars has a command control know as C squares....the command version of this vehicle as being a vast improvement in the CoC

  • @Danzo1212
    @Danzo1212 11 месяцев назад +4

    BAE Systems is a british defense contractor?

    • @Vash45Long
      @Vash45Long 11 месяцев назад

      The boght FMC

    • @pr1nce.b33
      @pr1nce.b33 9 месяцев назад

      It’s Italian

    • @ericb.4358
      @ericb.4358 8 месяцев назад

      BAE is a SWEDISH/BRITISH consortium that works with other arms manufacturers at times, such as the German company KONGSBERG that makes the 30 mm unmanned turret.

    • @trevorhart545
      @trevorhart545 7 месяцев назад

      @@ericb.4358 British that owns the main Swedish Armoured Vehicle manufacturer.

    • @ericb.4358
      @ericb.4358 7 месяцев назад

      @@trevorhart545 I always thought BAR Systems was a JOINT Brit/Swedish ownership, around 50/50. Nez pas?

  • @DJHazzard
    @DJHazzard 11 месяцев назад +1

    Looks like the German BOXER 😅 good upgrade for the Marines !

  • @gene-ry3vy
    @gene-ry3vy 11 месяцев назад +1

    I was hoping it gets fitted with a jawline missile with 30mm cannon.

  • @ruez
    @ruez 6 месяцев назад +2

    Designed and developed in Italy 🇮🇹

  • @Vash45Long
    @Vash45Long 11 месяцев назад

    Are these replacing Amtracs or LAVs?

    • @pr1nce.b33
      @pr1nce.b33 9 месяцев назад

      It’s replacing the AAV

  • @rammone5241
    @rammone5241 10 месяцев назад

    The crew exiting wearing only his overalls and no combat load, that looks very tight if you got a fireteam trying to enter the vehicle in a hail
    storm of bullets and mortars, that first step looks like 4 ft to the deck, I want to see a grunt in full load with his rifle hoping out that thing and back in. I am not seeing a ramp hinges on that rear, unless I missed something.

  • @edl617
    @edl617 11 месяцев назад +1

    Completely different horse than the old LVT-7. The best crews turn out to be those who never operate an LVT

  • @WarriorsBreakfast
    @WarriorsBreakfast 11 месяцев назад

    Good to go!

  • @Waltham1892
    @Waltham1892 11 месяцев назад +3

    WHY IS THERE NO BAYONET LUG ON THE 30MM?
    THAT IS FUCKING UNACCEPTABLE FOR A MARINE CORPS VEHICLE

    • @csh5414
      @csh5414 11 месяцев назад +1

      Don’t sweat it, there’s still a crayon dispenser in the crew compartment.

  • @EllaVloggs
    @EllaVloggs Год назад

    WOW

  • @billrich9722
    @billrich9722 11 месяцев назад +1

    God damn. Why is the music so loud and dramatic? It's distracting. And the speaker sounds like an AI.

  • @BuckPalanger
    @BuckPalanger 11 месяцев назад +1

    To this day they still haven't developed anything that worked better then the EFV, including this turd.

  • @Drownedinblood
    @Drownedinblood 11 месяцев назад +2

    Wait a minute I thought you were all saying amphib assault vehicles were useless in the modern day?

  • @thewilliam8342
    @thewilliam8342 11 месяцев назад +4

    They should have stayed with a tracked vehicle ….🤷🏻‍♂️

  • @antonmode1626
    @antonmode1626 10 месяцев назад

    Более легкую цель для РПГ или ПТРК еще поискать нужно. Удивительно что такие двухэтажные автобусы строят в принципе для военных.

  • @rasydrasta4568
    @rasydrasta4568 Год назад +5

    The height and V shape,, I recommend this ACV capable to be MRAP 😎😀

  • @ericb.4358
    @ericb.4358 8 месяцев назад

    Q: What's the MAXIMUM SEA STATE these vehicle can handle? Likely more than 3.

    • @russell7489
      @russell7489 7 месяцев назад

      Just what it's tested in mirror smooth no one shooting at you

  • @schlirf
    @schlirf 3 месяца назад

    Dear Marine Corps, Please reserve about a battalion's worth of those vehicles for the US Cavalry...just incase they have to cross a few dozen rivers.

  • @paulcoverdale8312
    @paulcoverdale8312 8 месяцев назад

    Do they sink as quick as the outgoing Brick?🙏🙏👍👍🇬🇧🇬🇧⛵️⛵️

  • @ericb.4358
    @ericb.4358 7 месяцев назад

    ANdnow if the Big Army would just order the CV 90 IFV from BAE. But Noooooo! it has already whittled done the contenders to two, and likely the German version will lose out to something that has the same chassis as the BOOKER light tank (yes, it IS a light tank, despite the Army's contorted name) something larger and harder to transport to a war zone.

  • @xmifi
    @xmifi 10 месяцев назад

    Since when is Stryker new?

    • @Jeremy.Bearemy
      @Jeremy.Bearemy 5 месяцев назад

      This is an ACV. The Stryker is not amphibious.

  • @JoePal-c3n
    @JoePal-c3n 21 день назад

    Without laser on top to take out the drones, then this is not gonna be working well

  • @xinjinpiig4062
    @xinjinpiig4062 11 месяцев назад

    Can they survive DONGFENG?

  • @MikeStefanu-p8f
    @MikeStefanu-p8f 3 месяца назад

    ONE MUST MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN

  •  10 месяцев назад +1

    When it face a Centauro II it will disappear.

  • @knowahnosenothing4862
    @knowahnosenothing4862 11 месяцев назад

    They should probably give them SHORAD module.

  • @BritMemes
    @BritMemes 9 месяцев назад +2

    Technically this is British as its designed and built by BAE Systems a British Company

    • @dinotestoni1891
      @dinotestoni1891 6 месяцев назад +1

      Copiato dal super av italiano non c'è niente d,'inglese

  • @IndigenousAmericanTrucker
    @IndigenousAmericanTrucker 10 месяцев назад

    About time they are replacing those older ACV's! Those things were so ugly, and all though these new ones are ugly, too, they look better than the old ones. They also needed to modernize, anyway! The Army has well surpassed the Marines, especially with the Stryker. Since the Marines are first in, they should have some of the best equipment, especially since they're a small force!

  • @comchadelalora
    @comchadelalora 10 месяцев назад

    More toys...?
    What for ?
    Are they going to use any ? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @candidorodriguez6259
    @candidorodriguez6259 Год назад

    Más potencia y mas velocidad en el mar

  • @Freedom2x462
    @Freedom2x462 7 месяцев назад

    yes that is enough to sink another amphibious lander, chinese got over kill canons! That's a handsome off roader!

  • @stevelevesque3274
    @stevelevesque3274 10 месяцев назад +1

    rear door won't work

  • @damongraham1398
    @damongraham1398 Год назад

    Can the ACV enter the maritime mission bay of the Freedom class version of the LCS?

  • @othosos
    @othosos 11 месяцев назад

    Imagine a thousand of these coming ashore your countries beach.

  • @cm-pr2ys
    @cm-pr2ys 11 месяцев назад +2

    Terrible idea...the ACV should be faster in water so as to enable an amphibious force to have the option to do beach assaults vice slapping a 30mm cannon on it that turns it into a glass cannon! It may have firepower but what about armor? You won't risk an entire 13-Marine Rifle Squad taking on enemy tanks and IFVs would you? This is a stupid idea, just focus on the APKWS if you want the acv to be able to take on armored vehicles.

    • @deadlydays3401
      @deadlydays3401 11 месяцев назад +7

      US Marine command basically said contested landings are an outdated concept, in their restructure that isn't what they are rebuilding for. So the amphibious part of these is just the logistics of getting them onto uncontested shorelines far away from port infrastructure (I presume before the enemy can move forces to contest it). If they needed more rapid landings I presume they'd use LCAC's or a more modern equiv (which I don't think they want to spend the money buying), maybe they will leave that capability to the Navy for logistics.

    • @dewdew80
      @dewdew80 11 месяцев назад

      speed in water from an amphibious vehicle requires something like a hovercraft, which the military already has. Much larger type of vehicle that would drop less amphibious vehicles off. In something like this...speed in water is wishful thinking, too high a requirement. If they need to land on extremely swampy terrain, then these things will come in handy. I imagine it would be useful if we wanted to conduct a massive war in southeast Asia, which has quite a bit of jungle and scattered bits of land that regularly floods.

    • @jds6206
      @jds6206 11 месяцев назад

      "US Marine command" should not be relied on for objective analysis and sound decisions. CMC Berger.....yea, that guy....is responsible for the FD2030 debacle which gutted the US Marine Corps, perhaps destroying the US Marine Corps. The ACV isn't a good design; refresh your head with the reports from California surf testing where it did NOT perform well and is now limited to pretty darn low sea-state.
      ACV.....big as a two car garage.....a bad idea. And, by the way, contested landings are most certainly NOT outdated, considering the asymmetric capabilities available today, to the "bad guys".
      Today's US Marine Corps leadership makes one wonder who is in charge and what are their true motives?
      Too many "yes men/women" in today's Corps......too many willing to "go along" to get ahead. @@deadlydays3401

    • @cm-pr2ys
      @cm-pr2ys 11 месяцев назад

      LCACs are huge targets. A Marine Corps should be able to conduct uncontested and contested landings as part of its amphibious capability.

  • @swimcali
    @swimcali 10 месяцев назад

    Why? It’s archaic thinking.

  • @SeaJay_Oceans
    @SeaJay_Oceans 10 месяцев назад

    I hope they don't sink to the bottom of the ocean like their last attempt at floating tanks in World War 2 ?

    • @russell7489
      @russell7489 7 месяцев назад

      They do 6 dead already

  • @hevertonsiqueira528
    @hevertonsiqueira528 2 месяца назад

    Nos demoramos pra fazer 01 Guarani e os americanos fazem um monstro marinho como um estralar de dedos 😂😅 🫣🤦🤡🤭😮🪖🫡🐊🐊🌽🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🐍🦥🪖🦖🦖🦖🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸😎🤝🫂

  • @chromaticturtle8657
    @chromaticturtle8657 11 месяцев назад

    um thats not NEW, its a stryker with a 30mm........

    • @20Mb01
      @20Mb01 11 месяцев назад

      It’s actually a licensed version of an Italian family of armoured vehicles based on the CENTAURO II … even though it resembles the Stryker because of some design convergence, it’s still is pretty different on the inside

    • @Jeremy.Bearemy
      @Jeremy.Bearemy 5 месяцев назад

      Stryker cannot drive in water

  • @jds6206
    @jds6206 11 месяцев назад +1

    100% propaganda. Just don't get the "ACV" into heavy surf or it'll ROLL OVER....... As big as a two-car garage....on wheels....really, REALLY bad idea.

  • @seandoherty1507
    @seandoherty1507 10 месяцев назад

    Don't make it over technical.

  • @กระบอกข่าวชาวกระบี่

    👍👍👍👍👍

  • @andreww1225
    @andreww1225 Год назад +12

    Send some of the old ones to Ukraine

    • @jeffwalsh4613
      @jeffwalsh4613 Год назад +5

      No shit!

    • @andreww1225
      @andreww1225 Год назад +1

      @@user-kr4rz5hn4n they usually test all that stuff before making deals

    • @rasydrasta4568
      @rasydrasta4568 Год назад

      This ACV capable to be MRAP too 👍because quite enough of height and good Vshape

    • @pr1nce.b33
      @pr1nce.b33 Год назад

      The old ones will be used for reserve and training units

    • @Gridlocked
      @Gridlocked Год назад

      ⁠@@user-kr4rz5hn4nThe AAVP7 is a piece of shit. It needs to go.

  • @joeswheat
    @joeswheat 10 месяцев назад

    Why? designed to do ferrying between island? Amphibious assault isn't going to happen in today's warfare. Doesn't matter what kind of Cope Cage you put on it, not happening. Thought they came to that realization with the EFV.

    • @russell7489
      @russell7489 7 месяцев назад

      Then why not just use landing craft to ferry in REAL IFVs

  • @juanlugo7492
    @juanlugo7492 11 месяцев назад +23

    This is a mistake these things are to slow in water the more time in water less chance of survival

    • @deadlydays3401
      @deadlydays3401 11 месяцев назад +22

      afaik marines said contested landings are basically impossible and their restructure isn't considering contested landings a primary focus. So the amphibious part of this is mostly logistics getting forces to an undefended shoreline far away from port infrastructure. afaik, you'd need a ton of fast hovercraft to be fast enough to make any contested landing....and you could just carry these on those anyway. Hovercraft are shit on land, so using them as anything other than transports is pretty pointless. So building these is fine I think, if they ever decide to bring back forces for conducting shoreline assaults they are likely going to just be building large hovercraft to tote these up to the beachfront. LCAC's, though maybe marines plan on leaving the LCAC landers to the navy and asking them for help landing if needed?

    • @coolbreeze2.0-mortemadfasc13
      @coolbreeze2.0-mortemadfasc13 11 месяцев назад +32

      This isn’t 1942, no one is making contested landings.

    • @MakeSomeNoisePlaylists
      @MakeSomeNoisePlaylists 11 месяцев назад +11

      too....its "too" slow....

    • @peterprovenzano9039
      @peterprovenzano9039 11 месяцев назад +6

      Agreed . With the ability to use both aviation, LCACs , and AMTRAKs mobility (hopefully) should make contested landing a thing of the past. This will be a amphibious IFV (again, I hope) first and a ship to shore transport second

    • @CorePathway
      @CorePathway 11 месяцев назад +4

      No one does amphibious assaults anymore. We will never accept the casualties a contested landing demands. Marines need to stop kidding themselves.

  • @aceu.c.veteran5167
    @aceu.c.veteran5167 11 месяцев назад

    Not new. Get it right.

  • @MikeStefanu-p8f
    @MikeStefanu-p8f 3 месяца назад

    Great REPUBLICAN PARTY FOR VICTORY.
    PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP MUST WIN

  • @sergiodesouzajunior3962
    @sergiodesouzajunior3962 Год назад +1

    Compro 20.000 unidades para a marinha do Brasil rio de janeiro e o projeto e a tecnologia para a avibras

  • @Joe-jv5mm
    @Joe-jv5mm 5 месяцев назад

    The top doesn't Look like it could take a strike from a Cheap 🇨🇳 rpg Drone 😉

  • @samseven5260
    @samseven5260 11 месяцев назад +2

    34 trillion in debt.

    • @Desstrik
      @Desstrik 11 месяцев назад

      then have your mom work more.

  • @puirYorick
    @puirYorick 10 месяцев назад

    Another channel uses an AI reader with corporate press releases as a script.👎🏼

  • @ИГРЫНАПК-----АлексейДонских

    ПЕРЕДЕРГИВАЕТЕ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ 90х в РОССИИ с ПРАПЕЛЕРОМ а ТАК свое на 2024год ПОКАЗАТЬ НЕЧЕВО все с РОССИИ ПЕРЕДЕРГИВАЕТЕ --- ОТСТОЙ )))).... СЕМИЧКИ для РОССИИ !!!

  • @sergiodesouzajunior3962
    @sergiodesouzajunior3962 Год назад

    Compro 100.000 unidades para a marinha do Brasil rio de janeiro

  • @briancooper2112
    @briancooper2112 Год назад

    Old news

  • @mingkwong9277
    @mingkwong9277 Год назад +1

    You will lose to PLA tanks

    • @Gridlocked
      @Gridlocked Год назад +7

      PLA tanks will lose to missiles.

    • @gld1010
      @gld1010 Год назад +9

      PLA tanks will break down.

    • @Desstrik
      @Desstrik 11 месяцев назад

      stringdong,
      wong answer!

    • @steelgear3876
      @steelgear3876 11 месяцев назад +1

      PLA tanks will lose by having water instead of fuel

  • @extremathule982
    @extremathule982 10 месяцев назад

    Look.....the IVECO ACV, ...this is interesting...

  • @mortenvikene228
    @mortenvikene228 10 месяцев назад +1

    next over priced, over complicated, high maintenance even higher maintenance price, peice of crap to steal taxpayer dollers with

  • @markbrockman9859
    @markbrockman9859 11 месяцев назад +1

    When is the marine corps going to get past storming the beaches.

    • @Desstrik
      @Desstrik 11 месяцев назад

      they will let you know

    • @chbgator2226
      @chbgator2226 11 месяцев назад

      When will people realize the AAV and now the ACV are/were never meant to 'storm the beach'? Marines travel on Naval vessels and the AAV and now ACV are one of the delivery methods to get them from ship to shore as well as inland objectives. That's why Marines are the "tip of the spear". We're always deployed on a ship somewhere, combat prepped and ready to go at a moments notice.

    • @petero3588
      @petero3588 10 месяцев назад

      "Tip of the Spear" is an acceptable way of saying "Cannon Fodder". "Deployed on a ship somewhere" means a reinforced battalion of infantry, along with a few tanks and artillery, doing "donuts in the ocean" waiting to land on an uncontested beach or airfield, securing the site for follow-on Army main forces, with the "big guns". They may also be joined with an Army Airborne battalion, and these two elements will defeat numerous potential enemies armed with bamboo spears and bananas! LOL!