Journey's End |
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 сен 2024
- As Davros' nightmarish plan approaches fruition, so too does Donna Noble's destiny...
Subscribe to Doctor Who for more exclusive videos: bit.ly/Subscrib...
WATCH MORE:
Compilations: bit.ly/DWCompil...
Regenerations: bit.ly/DWRegene...
Title Sequences: bit.ly/ALLTitle...
MORE ABOUT DOCTOR WHO:
Welcome to the Doctor Who Channel! Travel in the TARDIS with clips dating back to the Doctor's first incarnation in 1963, all the way through dozens of regenerations. Including behind-the-scenes footage, exclusive videos and our very own show Doctor Who: The Fan Show - this is the place to find all the best official clips.
#DoctorWho
This is a commercial channel from BBC Studios. Service information and feedback: www.bbcstudios...
10th and Donna has always been my favorite pair, and I've always been sad that we didn't get another season with them. I am beyond happy to see them back !
2:54 Donna’s exact words when seeing the TARDIS fly for the first time. He really has absorbed some of her personality.
She's so happy... and it's going to end before it can even get started.
At last we come to the conclusion of the DoctorDonnathon. That is unless you plan to include the End of Time specials.
Also I think the best part of the DoctorDonna is how she inherited a couple of Ten's phrases, like that "oh, yes" and "HAH"
Yeah, before the regeneration to the 11th, starred by Matt Smith.
And don't forget 10Two got "Well isn't THAT wizard!"
Supreme Dalek: "What is happening? Explain!"
The Doctor: "Ah, same old. Same old. Just the Doctor and Donna Noble in the TARDIS!"
(I know this reference is from the Twelfth Doctor's era but I could imagine the Tenth Doctor saying it.)
Anyone else ever think about how the regeneration energy laid dormant in Donnas head til that “little extra kick in the synapses” just like how for the doctor to wake up in Christmas Invasion he needed tea to “heat up the synapses” essentially to wake them back up? Could be a coincidence but the synapses woke what would save the universe in more than one way
Don't take me seriously, I'm only joking; but can you imagine if at the end of the 60th specials, Donna is about to die and 14th sacrifices himself by giving him his regenerative energy and it is Donna who regenerates into Ncuti 15th Doctor AHAHA
"I sound like you! All sort of......rough." 😂
OI 😂
Loved this episode so much ❤
Why is it that even though Jack can't tell us what he's thinking, we all know it anyway?
😜
I love that Jackie just watches the Daleks all disappointed in them 🤣🤣
This other Doctor that grew from the hand is still out there with Rose, that spin off will come, just wait!!!!!
Oh be still, my beating heart. ❤
The first time I saw a Dalek beg for help
DoctorDonna ❤ Like this one still one of best for me)
I still say "You. Are. Bonkers!"
God I love this episode. It's incredibly deus ex machina (and self-contradictory: is the Metacrisis part human too or "just timelord"?) but my inner child just goes *squeeeeee*
I hope they show a flashback to when Donna got the doctors memory
best duo
I like Journey's End
David Tennant The Tenth and Fourteenth Doctor is My Favourite Doctor in Doctor Who 👍
I am very happy to watch this❤ This is the best Doctor Who for me🥰 Doctor ➕ Donna together🌹 I missed Captain Jack and Martha Jones as well🥰✨
Got the supreme Dalek and Davros figure
Can't wait for new series!
Disney better not mess things up. I don't care what you do with Hazbins like Snow White and the like, but Doctor Who is sacred, treat it right, and it could be your once piece.
i might be a bit behind but, Disney owns Doctor Who? Since when? Was it part of the Discovery, Fox, what ever they gobbled up next merger?
BBC still owns and produces the show but Disney has the rights to put it their overseas platform.
@@AustinStarDustI thought disney was putting money into the budget as well.
No companion to date has matched donna. I loved amy, but donna could mop the floor with her
This is good
Love them
I'm a Doctor Who with cerebral palsy, and I was heartbroken to see you've undisabled (not a word) Davros, yes, hes a villain, yes he's horrible but I liked seeing a disabled character be so badass... Davros is someone disabled fans can easily imitate, and it's been taken away... Our fanbase knows disabled people aren't evil, and if you do, well, you probably need more support than disabled people do... I can see your doing loads of wonderful work getting more positive disabled role models into the show, with the brilliant Ruth Madeley and Lenny Rush, but you don't need to change Davros, please give us our creepy disabled character back! ❤
Davros was already shown as a kid earlier in the series outside of the new Children in need special, and he wasnt disabled then. His past self not requiring a mechanism to assist in movement doesnt change his future characters need of it, nor the iconic appearance we know he turns into. They didnt change davros, only developed the character and gave him a past. Plenty of disabled people didn't always require exterior assistance, and this only furthers his inclusivity if thats truly what you feel a need to worry about.
@@DSPikachu what you say is true of course, but the way Russell was speaking we will never see that iconic Davros look in the new series again, I think that’s a shame and that’s why I’m upset…😢
@@DSPikachuRTD has said that Davros will no longer be disabled going forwards.
@@Cybermat47how is that going to work when we have seen him out of chair with no legs when 12 stole his chair - are they giving him bionic legs or something
@@markcolgan3262 I imagine they’ll use the whole regeneration thing in _The Witch’s Familiar_ as an explanation, or go with the ‘mind transferred to a clone body’ idea that was mentioned in the audio stories _Davros_ and _Terror Firma_
Ugh. I'm reminded just how bad RTD series finales could get with their contrived deus ex machina...
Love them✨
❤❤
Could 14 somehow be the metacrisis Doctor?!
Oh, dear Jack. We would think the same. 🫢😂
*OI*
I think I know what Jack Harkness think at the end of the video 👀
When will these episodes air here in America?
You mean re-air?
Rose geri gel
Worms? I think she means starfish
We need 14 and Jack to unite over these 3 episodes. Would be great
I'm surprised you guys didn't digitally replace Davros in this. 🙄
Yes. It's so ableist. Mocking survivors of atomic radiation, portraying them as fit only to be locked out of sight in travel machines. Also, victims of meta-crisis are portrayed here as second rate citizens. Cancel these outdated ideas RTD!
Just couldn’t help yourself could you.
I’ve visiting my nans grave tomorrow.
Fancy coming over and pissing on that too?
It seems, you didn't like the "change" *Destination: Skaro* has done to him all that much ...
I want tom hiddleston to be the 16th docter
SPEAKING OF 'TIME LORDS':
WHO AND/OR WHAT AM I? DO 'I' EVEN EXIST?
Consider the following:
a. I am a human as defined by humans.
b. I am an energy based quarkelectronian as modern science claims that all matter is made up of quarks, electrons and interacting energy and I am made up of matter and interacting energy.
c. I am a being of 'light', 'if' my current theory of everything is correct whereby the 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in this universe, including space, time and numbers. (Currently dependent upon the results of my gravity test).
d. "I" do not even actually exist but eternally existent space time exists as me, currently in the forms as above.
* I exist and yet "I" simultaneously do not exist, dependent upon perspective. But yet, do "I" not truly exist in absolute truth reality as only eternally existent space time exists as all things in absolute truth reality?
* "I" can mentally change between perspectives thereby experiencing existence from those various perspectives. "My" mind continues to expand, but is it truly 'my' mind that is expanding or is it eternally existent space time's mind that is expanding? In absolute truth reality, it would seem to be the later.
* 'To Be or Not To Be'. I am both, 'I Am and I Am Not.' But I Am Not it appears more than I Am.
* Consider also: If asked the general question, 'What do you know?'. My current answer would be, 'Not much compared to all that can be known.' (I Am Not, More than I Am). It's humbling.
* Is it truly any wonder that the flow of energy in the universe affects species? We are the universe experiencing itself.
* Question: If 'I' never actually existed in the first place, how could 'I' ever die?
* Added Note: Now, 'assuming' the above is correct, that 'I' do not even actually exist but that eternally existent energy exists as 'me', and that 'my' consciousness, memories and thoughts are actually the universe acting through the form of 'me':
a. I have yet to acquire any 'new' knowledge via this supposed connection that cannot be explained by 'normal' means. (In other words, besides things I learned or intuited). Even my theory of everything and other ideas are due to study and critical thinking. Nor can I magically fluently speak a language that I have not already learned. (In other words, no magical connection with the 'universal consciousness' at this time can be noted).
b. I have yet to be able to manipulate reality with my mind alone, my physical body is necessary to manipulate reality.
c. While I can imagine being elsewhere in this universe, it does not appear that I can actually take just my mind actually there. (My mind is where my body is).
d. Doesn't mean I will stop trying, just have not noticed the above as occurring as of yet.
Also, another view:
ETERNAL CONSCIOUS EXISTENCE ACHIEVED?
Consider the following as well, even utilizing modern science:
a. Modern science claims that energy cannot be created nor destroyed (a foundational principal of physics). Hence, energy is either eternally existent, or modern science is wrong.
b. Modern science claims that we have new cells that come into existence inside of our body on a daily basis. This appears to be really true.
So, since I have a body with energy and cells in it:
* A part of me is eternally existent and a part of me is being born anew on a daily basis.
* My current body extends from eternity past until now.
* Rising to a higher level of thought, the 'now' that I exist in is 'eternal'.
* I am currently existing in the 'eternal now'.
* I am currently an actual eternally existent conscious entity existing in the eternal now.
At least once in my life I reached being an actual eternally existent conscious entity existing in the eternal now. It's just that the current analysis indicates that it will not always be that way.
But then again, as I don't know what I don't know, and even what I believe I know to be really true maybe isn't, as well as my mind making up stuff to fill in the gaps of it's perceived existence, along with other items too, I will be the first to admit that I could be wrong. Maybe once attained, I actually have an actual eternal conscious existence in some form throughout all of future eternity. Can I really ever prove to myself that I don't?
And also: "IF" my TOE idea is correct, then:
* I am currently an actual eternally existent conscious being of light ('gem' photons) existing in an environment entirely made of light ('gem' photons), existing in the eternal now.
But then also: "IF" my definitions of Space Time and the TOE idea are correct, then:
* Do "I" and all things even actually exist in the first place, OR does ONLY the 'gem' photons exist as all things? How could "I" ever die if "I" never actually existed in the first place but the eternally existent 'gem' photons were existing as "me"? And if the 'gem' photons decided to exist as "me" throughout all of future eternity, whom am "I" to argue with them since "I" don't even actually exist at all in the first place? If the 'gem' photons decided to exist as "me" throughout all of future eternity, they might only have to will it to be so.
And note, this would apply to you too.
* Added note: One just has to find out how to stay 'life coherent' throughout literally all of future eternity, otherwise, one would eventually de-cohere back from whence one came. One would die and go extinct for all the rest of future eternity. Such it appears is 'life' until life itself is no more.
* Alternative: Find a way to keep the energy of our being in a coherent format so as to stay alive in some form to exist throughout all of future eternity, (future eternity being a really, really long time, with literally no end). Plus, one would have to live through many, many, many mass extinction events of all kinds. And then also, one would have an ever growing list of long lost loved ones who either could not, or chose not to, stay coherent themselves throughout all of future eternity. So that life itself has continued meaning and purpose to throughout all of future eternity.
LIFE ITSELF, LOVE AND MONEY
There is something greater than Love and that is life itself.
For without life itself, there can be no Love.
There is something greater than Money and that is life itself.
For without life itself, Money loses all meaning and purpose.
is this what schizophrenia is
@@Visquint No. But you questioning the above makes me wonder about your own sanity.
Too much information.
First
Yup
....SCRATCHING HEAD .....WELL I'M DEFINITELY NOT BRITISH SO JUST BARELY UNDERSTOOD WHAT THEY WERE SPEAKING ABOUT
.......AMERICAN VERSION OF LANGUAGE IS MUCH BETTER, HEHE......
Spanner for wrench was the only British word to translate. The rest was technobabble and scifi speak
Catherine Tate Who Played Donna Noble I Loved Her as The Tenth and Fourteenth Doctors Companion Loads Lots and So So Much in Doctor Who ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️