Not sure what the heel and toe ratings really mean. My TSr3 is great but my Paradym Triple Diamond is longer because of lower spin and just as forgiving.
@@laakuma And that's my thing at the moment. Robots literally can't lie and before independent testers could use them, people just had to go off what was considered a "good" driver. More and more we're finding out Taylormade ongoingly sacrifices consistency and forgiveness for distance so they can be the "longest driver in golf." And even Ping is starting to show how a lot of their drivers are forgiving, but not as forgiving as people hype them up to be. In terms of strokes gained off the tee, Titleist just leaves the rest in the dust at the moment, as long as you can tolerate somone outdriving you by 5 yards when they aren't too busy digging their ball out of the woods.
@@BigDawgCAM There is zero data that proves Titleist leaves the "rest in the dust". You are biased becasue you spent money on one, thats it. As a matter of fact, the left to right and front to back dispersion on the 10.5 here trumps every Titleist tested by these guys. Its that accurate from anywhere on the face.
@@No_Fear_33 if you look at both reviews it says the titliest is better unless I'm not reading it right. I'm getting a new driver soon so plz correct me if I am wrong otherwise it's tsr 3 for me.
The best review I’ve seen as you mention the open face. As proven by Victor Hovland that’s still in the 425 because of that
That's not why Viktor is still in the 425 LST.
Why don't you guys include the actual spin and launch angle numbers
not fair to others to compare to ping they usually have top driver every new release year so maybe compare the rest vs each other instead
Man, everything looks terrible next to the Titleist's Heel and Toe Rating
Not sure what the heel and toe ratings really mean. My TSr3 is great but my Paradym Triple Diamond is longer because of lower spin and just as forgiving.
@@laakuma And that's my thing at the moment. Robots literally can't lie and before independent testers could use them, people just had to go off what was considered a "good" driver.
More and more we're finding out Taylormade ongoingly sacrifices consistency and forgiveness for distance so they can be the "longest driver in golf." And even Ping is starting to show how a lot of their drivers are forgiving, but not as forgiving as people hype them up to be.
In terms of strokes gained off the tee, Titleist just leaves the rest in the dust at the moment, as long as you can tolerate somone outdriving you by 5 yards when they aren't too busy digging their ball out of the woods.
@@BigDawgCAM There is zero data that proves Titleist leaves the "rest in the dust". You are biased becasue you spent money on one, thats it. As a matter of fact, the left to right and front to back dispersion on the 10.5 here trumps every Titleist tested by these guys. Its that accurate from anywhere on the face.
@@No_Fear_33 if you look at both reviews it says the titliest is better unless I'm not reading it right. I'm getting a new driver soon so plz correct me if I am wrong otherwise it's tsr 3 for me.