Exposing Jehovah's Witnesses: JW News, The New World Translation; using it against them.

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 окт 2024
  • #bible #pimo #exjw
    Live show, exposing the Jehovah's Witness Bible the New World Translation. The Goal of this talk will be showing how we can still use their Bible to reach witnesses. Even in their twisted version, you can still come to the conclusion that Jesus is God, salvation is by faith, and no organization is needed. Come see new content, comment, ask questions, laugh, and try not to go insane while we read parts of the NWT.
    Subscribe for More content: Light Over Dark Ministry
    👥 Join our Community on Twitter or Instagram

Комментарии • 138

  • @thelthrythquezada8397
    @thelthrythquezada8397 11 часов назад +3

    The day I realized that Jesus IS Jehovah my brain blow up... I was raised in that religion but didn't care for it at all. (c.1983-1995ish) it wasn't till 2017 when The Lord knocked on my door and I was happy He did.

  • @RealizeReaLies100
    @RealizeReaLies100 День назад +8

    "Whoever has the Son" is the channel of Husain, a Muslim turned Christian... He does great work also! But love your ministry DH! Very informative and one of those videos I'll be watching again and taking notes! Just started a study with a sweet JW that came to my door and will definitely be using these scriptures! Praying she'll find the real Jesus🙏🏼 and thank you again for your time and deep dive into these very important topics! God bless you and your family and ministry!

  • @thelthrythquezada8397
    @thelthrythquezada8397 11 часов назад +2

    I just got power back on from Milton. But the Lord created me to be a preper so I was cool

  • @anniesavedbygrace
    @anniesavedbygrace День назад +3

    Thankyou Brother this is really helpful. Much appreciated x

  • @Fjmaster2023
    @Fjmaster2023 День назад +5

    Nice video man..keep it up..

  • @richbaker7187
    @richbaker7187 День назад +8

    The logical fallacy of the JW is that they have equated "Jehovah" as being ONLY the Father. So the bible doesn't say Jesus claimed to be the FATHER, but He claimed to God in many, many passages, as shown in this video.
    AGAIN. Jesus doesn't EVER claim to be the Father. So JWs? STOP straw manning the Godhead.

  • @mmltpb14
    @mmltpb14 День назад +1

    Hello DH,
    Would you mind clarifying something up for me?
    You’ve mentioned before(and in this live) that Rev 12 is a “rewind” of things that have already happened.
    Where in the book does this “rewind” happen? Is it in chapter 12? Is it sooner? When does it end?
    (Hopefully this makes sense)
    Thanks and awesome job

  • @markshark1613
    @markshark1613 2 дня назад +5

    It always amazes me when JWs say that Jesus is the Son of God but not God, and yet they somehow forget John 5 v 18 " He not only broke the Sabbath, but also said that God was his Father, making himself EQUAL WITH GOD"
    So, every single time he referred to himself as the Son of God and God being his Father, he was making himself equal with God. This is plain and simple to any person that can read! The Jews, unlike the JWs understood it perfectly as they tried to kill him!

    • @Mr.DC3.1914
      @Mr.DC3.1914 2 дня назад

      you believed those Jews who wanted to Kill Jesus and thought Jesus SINNED by breaking the Sabbath and whom Jesus said are from their father, the father of lies.

    • @markshark1613
      @markshark1613 День назад +3

      @@Mr.DC3.1914 it amazes me how many hoops a Jehovah's witness has to go through to try to manipulate the text. Did you watch the video above or are you just here to comment again?

    • @markshark1613
      @markshark1613 День назад +4

      @@Mr.DC3.1914 are you therefore admitting that the Jews believed that Jesus was equal to the Father?

    • @Mr.DC3.1914
      @Mr.DC3.1914 День назад +1

      @@markshark1613 Nope, only THOSE Specific Jews as they were wrong in saying that Jesus SINNED by breaking the Sabbath and as Jesus mentioned, those Jews were from the FATHER OF LIES, so why would you believe them? and as Jesus mentioned to them "and you do not have his word residing in you," so those Jews were wrong

    • @markshark1613
      @markshark1613 День назад +3

      @@Mr.DC3.1914 have you read a few verses later in John 5 v 23? " That all should honour the Son JUST as they honour the Father. He who does not honour the Son does not honour the Father who sent him"
      So if you honour the Father as Jehovah, and Jesus himself says you need to honour him in the same way, then I want a simple yes or no answer. Do YOU honour the Son just as you honour the Father?

  • @markshark1613
    @markshark1613 2 дня назад +5

    " I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd gives his life for the sheep" Jesus in John 10 v 11. Compare with Psalm 23 v 1 " Jehovah is my shepherd I shall not want"
    Jesus is the good shepherd; Jehovah is the shepherd. A Jehovah's witness at this point will have to then say that Michael the archangel is The good shepherd, a title reserved for Jehovah 😅

    • @Reyseer.25
      @Reyseer.25 2 дня назад +1

      The thing is they make angels equal to God and say, without saying satan whos an angel (was) and all other fallen with him, and the others like Michael gabriel .are the same
      Colossians 2:18
      [18]Let no man beguile you of your reward in a voluntary humility and worshipping of angels, intruding into those things which he hath not seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind,

    • @davidagnew8792
      @davidagnew8792 День назад

      Jesus is the chief of the shepherds (1 Peter 5:4 ESV).
      Like the chief of the angels (Daniel 10:13 LSV, Young's).
      1 Peter 5:4 (Jubilee): "And when _the great Prince_ of the pastors shall appear."
      Daniel 12:1 (ESV): "At that time shall arise Michael, _the great prince_ ."
      How many _great princes_ are there?
      Do you think God would only appoint "one of the chief princes" over his nation Israel?
      Jesus is Michael the chief of the angels and the chief of the shepherds.

    • @Reyseer.25
      @Reyseer.25 День назад +4

      @@davidagnew8792 you like confuson it seems

    • @markshark1613
      @markshark1613 День назад +4

      @@davidagnew8792 I've spent half the day hearing bible butchering from your watchtower mate on my other comments. Forgive me for not entertaining it here too.
      If you think that Jesus can call himself the Good Shepherd (and remember he said that no one is good but God alone), and as the chief shepherd who gives eternal life, judges the world and separates the sheep from the goats, all titles and functions of God alone then I truly despair at the extent of biblical, exegetical and hermeneutic mangling of the bible from the Russelite faithful!
      Go look at the meaning of the word "eisegesis". The watchtower has with no shame at all before God and man, been done this since 1880.

    • @davidagnew8792
      @davidagnew8792 День назад

      ​@@markshark1613Is Jesus unique or just one of several _great princes_ ?

  • @astridmiller7938
    @astridmiller7938 2 дня назад +1

    i have never needed to be spiritual, do i need to get a religion? saying that what if i don't see any value in a belief of a god or a need to be saved, i mean what do i need to worry about being saved from what or whats beyond what i have now.? these questions are genuine and not to vex anyone. i have a happy and fulfilled life now and curious why people need to believe in something unseen.

    • @markshark1613
      @markshark1613 2 дня назад +4

      The answers to your question would probably take a whole day to write 😊 so I'll be very brief. It's not about trying to be spiritual or have a religion or wanting to believe in something unseen. Many of us have experienced Jesus in remarkable ways. He has changed us from the inside out and He is the one that has shown us his love and existence. But ultimately it comes down to one thing...who is Jesus. When you see what he claimed for himself, what miracles he did, how he transformed the very society we live in, that he claimed he would rise from the dead and as a fact of history over 500 people saw him after his death, one cannot ignore this.
      So I urge you, look into him, research him. That same God has given you free will. I urge you to use it to look into his claims and the evidence for the bible.
      God bless 😊

    • @astridmiller7938
      @astridmiller7938 2 дня назад +3

      @@markshark1613 thank you for the reply.

    • @RowanTasmanian
      @RowanTasmanian 2 дня назад +3

      @@markshark1613 Great answer Mark, it's a pleasure to read your comments. Always well thought out and concise. Thanks Mate.

    • @markshark1613
      @markshark1613 2 дня назад +3

      @@RowanTasmanian thanks for the encouragement. Hope you are well?

    • @Mr.DC3.1914
      @Mr.DC3.1914 2 дня назад +1

      If you want eternal life, as Jesus said you have to know the only true God who is the Father and whom the Father sent Jesus Christ. John 17:3

  • @lonahulbin1493
    @lonahulbin1493 День назад +1

    Oh, the governing body explains that the glory for Jesus is different from the glory of the father.
    The father‘s glory is always higher than the glory of the son.
    That is just the latest explanation from the governing body .
    I heard about that listening to the governing body yesterday where they explained two different glory, father from the son.

    • @richbaker7187
      @richbaker7187 День назад +5

      Why not? They have many "twos"
      They have 2 gods
      They have 2 hopes
      They have 2 destinations
      They have 2 classes of people
      They have 2 "great crowds"
      They have 2 Saviors
      They have 2 Alpha and Omegas
      and....
      They have 2 sides of their faces that they talk out of.

  • @mattgardiner614
    @mattgardiner614 День назад +1

    I see the deletions of comments have started already. I'll try this again. See if a little editing makes a difference.
    The Elephant in the room (For those not willfully ignoring it), is that there is plenty of variety in the Translations that you would no doubt find more acceptable. Why would there even be a need for multiple Translations if they are all word-for-word the same? Many modern translations leave out 16 verses found in the King James and other older versions. (Matthew 17:21; 18:11; 23:14; Mark 7:16; 9:44 & 46; 11:16; 15:28; Luke 17:16; John 5:3b & 4; Acts 8:37; 15:34; 24:6-8; 28:29; Romans 16:24; 1 John 5:7,8) Apparently, the NEW King James Version contains an "estimated 100,000 changes, averaging 80 per page."
    Catholic Bibles of course have their 'Apocrypha' and (I think?) include all the 'Spurious' verses. (No doubt misterauctor will be along soon to make common cause with the rest of you, accusing JW's of 'Changing' the bible) So, yeah. Utter Hypocrisy being shown yet again. A very, VERY dark pot calling the kettle black.

    • @ashleymarie8860
      @ashleymarie8860 22 часа назад +2

      There is a difference between translations saying the same thing but in various ways versus taking scripture and twisting and changing the meaning or message.There is a great video on youtube showing how the Jehovahs witness interlinear shows they translate a verse correctly showing the greek under the english words but once it gets into the New World Translation it is mistranslated. Some are a mere few verse down. So they translated it properly then later somehow forgot how? That is not by accident. It changes the meaning which is deceitful. I studied with Witnesses on and off for several years. I finally seen things for what they were before getting baptized. I started to research outside the Org which is not allowed. It has brought me closer to the actual Truth. I thank God for that!

  • @mattgardiner614
    @mattgardiner614 День назад +2

    I'll get to the video in a bit, but first I want to say that I find your introductory text comment under the video rather patronizing. You tell your audience that they can use the Bible to 'Reach' us. How? By coming up to us with single verses (In total isolation, in my experience, when I'm out-and-about) and some spiel about how it means something totally different from what I know it's saying when looked at in context and cross-referenced with other verses? Now that I think on it, here on this channel, half the CA's (Christendom Adherents) I converse with, don't use scripture at all. (They know who they are)
    JW's read every word of every verse of every chapter of every bible book, and that's just for the 'Treasures from God's Word' part of our midweek meeting. We get through the entire Bible, cover-to-cover, in around 2 years or so. And then repeat. This is in addition to our personal Bible reading, (I'm on 1st Kings at the moment), personal study, our Congregation Bible Study, WT study, Family Worship, our studies with Bible students, and researching and preparing our meeting parts. We spend more time immersed in the bible than your average Christendom adherent, BY MILES.
    The only Witnesses who would ever fall for something like that are ones who are consciously or sub-consciously looking for an 'out' anyway.

  • @Mr.DC3.1914
    @Mr.DC3.1914 День назад

    WHom did Jesus give the bread and wine? It started with the Apostles and eventually extended to other disciples. What are they going to do? They will be JUDGES as mentioned in Luke 22, they were given the Kingdom and they will BE priests and kings. rEV 5 - and you made them to be a kingdom and priests to our God,q and they are to rule as kings over the earth.” They were given authority to JUDGE and become KINGS - rev 20:4 - And I saw thrones, and those who sat on them were given authority to JUDGE. Yes, I saw the souls* of those executed* for the witness they gave about Jesus and for speaking about God, and those who had not worshipped the wild beast or its image and had not received the mark on their forehead and on their hand.h And they came to life and ruled as KINGS with the Christ for 1,000 years.
    Rev 20:6 - Happy and holy is anyone having part in the first resurrection;l over these the second deathm has no authority,n but they will be priestso of God and of the Christ, and they will rule as kings with him for the 1,000 years. THOSE WHO WILL RULE AS KINGs AND PRIESTS and they are part of the FIRST RESURRECTION, THEY ARE the firstfruits. rev 14:4 mentions that these firstfruits are "These are the ones who did not defile themselves with women; in fact, they are virgins.i These are the ones who keep following the Lamb no matter where he goes.j These were bought from among mankind as firstfruits to God and to the Lamb," HOW MANY ARE THEY? REV 14:3 MENTIONS "And they are singing what seems to be a new songe before the throne and before the four living creaturesf and the elders,g and no one was able to master that song except the 144,000,h who have been bought from the earth." 144K

  • @Mr.DC3.1914
    @Mr.DC3.1914 2 дня назад +1

    Most truly I say to you, a slave is not greater than his master, nor is one who is sent greater than the one who sent him.q John 13:16 . Jesus was SENT BY GOD - and called as SERVANT OF GOD. Acts 4:27
    WHO IS OVER ALL? Ephesians 4:6 one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all. GOD and FATHER is OVER/ABOVE ALL and that "All" includes the SON so they are NOT EQUAL
    THE BIBLE teaches that Jesus was MADE As Lord and Christ and as Son (ACTS 2:36, Prov 8, HEB 1:5), CREATED/PRODUCED/INSTALLED (Prov 8) , COME INTO BEING/MADE (Mat 21:42 - egeneto) and GIVEN LIFE by the Father - John 5:26 and it uses TODAY (Heb 1:5), and uses future tenses and is a prophecy in Isa 9:6 (Isa 9:6, - WILL BE) . If you are called MADE AND CREATED AND GIVEN LIFE, and NEVER CALLED in the BIBLE as Creator or Maker , then you are A CREATION. ALL FROM THE BIBLE
    From the Lord was this (this is referring to the chief cornerstone who is Jesus) , the word WAS is egeneto (made or came into being) - Matthew 21:42 and the exact Greek word used in John 1:3 - MADE, egeneto (came into being) - JESUS WAS MADE/CAME INTO BEING FROM THE FATHER , yes, Jesus was MADE/CREATED!, See also Acts 2:36, Heb 1:5, 1 john 5
    Jesus in FACT mentioned the FATHER IS GREATER than I am. JOhn 14:28. BEFORE he WAS SENT, the Father is ALSO GREATER than Jesus.
    Most truly I say to you, a slave is not greater than his master, nor is one who is sent greater than the one who sent him.q John 13:16 . Jesus was SENT BY GOD - and called as SERVANT OF GOD. Acts 4:27
    AFTER his resurrection the FATHER IS STILL GREATER than Jesus - WHO IS OVER ALL? Ephesians 4:6 one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all. GOD and FATHER is OVER/ABOVE ALL and that "All" includes the SON so they are NOT EQUAL

  • @Mr.DC3.1914
    @Mr.DC3.1914 День назад

    YOU CANNOT DENY HISTORICAL FACT that your paganized Trinity was MAN-MADE and formulated after about 400 years - FROM BRITANNICA - The Council of Nicaea in 325 stated the crucial formula for that doctrine in its confession that the Son is “of the same substance [homoousios] as the Father,” even though it said very little about the Holy Spirit. Over the next half century, St. Athanasius defended and refined the Nicene formula, and, by the end of the 4th century, under the leadership of St. Basil of Caesarea, St. Gregory of Nyssa, and St. Gregory of Nazianzus (the Cappadocian Fathers), the doctrine of the Trinity took substantially the form it has maintained ever since

    • @richbaker7187
      @richbaker7187 День назад +2

      @Mr.DC3.191 Against my better judgment in dealing with trolls like this moron, DC, I'll ask him anyway.
      Do you realize most everybody knows this was a partial quote used by the WT in their Anti-trinity booklet? Have you read the whole entry?

  • @Mr.DC3.1914
    @Mr.DC3.1914 День назад

    You PAGANIZED JESUS, so you don't have the real Jesus.
    Babylonia
    "The ancient Babylonians recognised the doctrine of a trinity, or three persons in one god-as appears from a composite god with three heads forming part of their mythology, and the use of the equilateral triangle, also, as an emblem of such trinity in unity" (Thomas Dennis Rock, The Mystical Woman and the Cities of the Nations, 1867, pp. 22-23).
    India
    "The Puranas, one of the Hindoo Bibles of more than 3,000 years ago, contain the following passage: 'O ye three Lords! know that I recognize only one God. Inform me, therefore, which of you is the true divinity, that I may address to him alone my adorations.' The three gods, Brahma, Vishnu, and Siva [or Shiva], becoming manifest to him, replied, 'Learn, O devotee, that there is no real distinction between us. What to you appears such is only the semblance. The single being appears under three forms by the acts of creation, preservation, and destruction, but he is one.'

    • @RowanTasmanian
      @RowanTasmanian День назад +7

      DC3 you believe in Just one more God than Christianity does. So did the pagans. So do all polytheists.
      It must be very awkward when people ask you how many Gods you believe in and you have to say “well my friend,I believe in 2 Gods “
      Hmmmm DC3, you have a very interesting belief system. 2 Gods is 1 more than us Christians.

    • @Mr.DC3.1914
      @Mr.DC3.1914 День назад

      @@RowanTasmanian the only TRUE GOD is the Father acc to Jesus and you don't understand that, just like you don't understand that 1 is not 3, nor you know what DEFINITION and the word WHOEVER means, and the same thing that your WIFE does not know that you liKE three wives

    • @RealizeReaLies100
      @RealizeReaLies100 День назад +2

      ​@@Mr.DC3.1914 did you listen to any of this video? Any rebuttal of the actual scriptures?

    • @markshark1613
      @markshark1613 День назад +3

      ​@@RealizeReaLies100They don't listen, and many have admitted to this as they can't listen to or watch " Apostate material". The true marks of a cult

    • @martinlist708
      @martinlist708 День назад +2

      Why just Ctrl + Alt the text from WT.? All these silly arguments are already explained and destroyed in a lot of videos including bible sources, in this channel or in Lot other Channels. Start to think by yourself, and also use other sources for your research....it gives a much bigger horizon