My two favorites are: 1) Lawyers used ChatGTP to prepare a brief for the court. When the judge checked the cited decisions, he found out that they either did not exist or the decision was grossly misinterpreted. 2) When an Artificial Idiot was used to diagnose skin lesions, it determined the lesion was cancerous when there was a ruler in the picture.
The legal industry is literally one of the most vulnerable industries to be replaced with AI. One example of failure does not equate to the huge increase in efficiency that AI has introduced to the legal industry across the board. Lawyers are definitely going to be losing their jobs. If done correctly, AI can replace a whole host of jobs. The entire global economy is going to need a re-work because of it, and people affected by it the most will likely gain a universal income of some sorts due to the taxation of the robots that have replaced their industries. You will basically be gaining an income just for existing.
The skin cancer AI was 100% default of the developers. If you're going to poison the well of the data set you can't be surprised at the outcome is useless. Every single example of cancer had a ruler in the image and all of the examples of non-cancerous growth didn't have a ruler in the image. There is blame to be laid here but it's not at the feet of the AI it's at the idiot researchers who did think it through.
@@Boyakishan I rewound it more than a dozen times, I shared it 20 times and I’m still laughing 3 days later. Convinced there is a special layer waiting for me in hell.
I thought back to Russell's reference to computers taking things literally/misinterpresting when I read this. "Computer, take out humanity". (later) Computer says: "We went out. I had the fish, humanity ordered the chicken. A lovely evening was had by all."
I've been A-B testing certain types of comments on the YT comment section for a while now. I still can't tell which are just illiterate tools and which are repurposed AI chatbots that can't read text formats that humans should be able to figure out in seconds.
Theres a streamer that played chess against chatGPT. It was awful at it. AI programs are only designed to do one specific job, so getting an AI designed to mimic human speech and get it to do just about anything else and it will always do it completely wrong. True AI is still very, very fary away.
Keep in mind... What we have now, is as bad as it will ever be. This is the start, not the peak. Also when it comes to single use ai, that's not necessarily true as even gpt has plugins which allows it to interact in other ways. Am I personally worried? As a musician and artist? No. There's already some fantastic ML projects that clones voices almost perfectly and can generate music really damn similar to what I would write. But at the end of it all, these are just tools and tools by themselves aren't evil. How we use them, that's the issue.
Artificial Super Intelligence(ASI) is what people should be concerned about and what extremely intelligent people like Stephen Hawking have raised serious concerns about(BBC - Stephen Hawking warns artificial intelligence could end mankind - 2 December 2014). If we reach technological singularity, things can very quickly get out of human hands. AI as it is isn't particularly scary but will lead to massive job loss/economic restructuring on a scale that humans have never encountered. Factory level machine automation job loss would pale in comparison. If we'll ever create ASI remains to be seen although IMO it will happen in the not too distant future. Its implications we can never know. It may be the best of times, it may be the worst of times(it could be the age of wisdom, it could be the age of foolishness, sorry, had to).
ChatGPT-4 can call on other AIs. So, in a year, if you want to play chess against chatGPT, it will just call on an AlphaGo extension and crush anyone lol That is the thing with AIs can work as agents for each other. Besides, these models were not "programmed" as such. They learned by themselves, so they can develop habilities that were not expected like how language models can in some cases model physics or create music.
He’s saying your taste is weak bruh, which it is, the guys being doing the same shtick since Good News when I was like 10, don’t get me wrong he’s entertaining and enjoyable to watch but funniest uk comedian today? Crazy statement
@@barcelonachair6487 You could say that but unlike a human an AI can't rationalize itself, it's just trying to operate within the parameters of it's programming which adds a new layer of unpredictability.
High five!!! I've had to delete so many rants about that word, spoken like that, from so many YT videos...If I'd left them I'd be banned off the site. My next most hated mispronounced word is "Acrost" instead of "across". There is NO FREAKING T in that word...sorry. Lost my composure. Hearing people in interviews saying "I axed about that" instead of "asked", "I drugged him out of the house" instead of "I dragged..." And anyone under forty years of age whose every second word is "Like". And "it is what it is" has now made it to No: 5 in my most disliked expressions.
The more I learn about the development of AI in my studies, the more I get scared of the effects of capitalism on AI development. If AI projects are funded by the people, and the primary motivation behind them is making the world a better place for everyone, I think it'll probably mostly be fine. But, when an AI projects are funded by a few people who are primarily motivated by getting a return on investment, that is when we get misaligned and dangerous AI products released upon the world to turn a profit.
I heard a fun story about AI. A coding camp/class/competition was challenged to create an AI to play Poker. The Winner was just programmed to go All In every time and the more sophisticated AI systems couldn't respond properly to it.
Foundational large language models can be quite good in getting the nuances in language right, that is something they can be trained on with large amounts of text. However, they are not as good in getting niche facts right. Essentially they generate the next message that is missing in a conversation, so when you're asking questions about some specific fact, you're not querying a database (well, maybe a vector-database, but that's not helping to make a point here). You're asking a question, so it generates an answer (which is what is missing in the conversation), but the facts in that answer are based on probability, and might be completely wrong, but brought verry convicingly.
Using a multi-million dollar fighter simulator, AI was tested using voice input. The AI would ask if it were performing correctly after each command and it was supposed to be learning how to perform maneuvers literally and instantly. Well, it certainly was taking things quite literally. After ordering the AI to perform a simple left banking turn while holding the g's to a precise 2.2 g's, it asked if it were performing correctly. The pilot commanding the AI said, "That's right. Keep it up." The AI, while in a left bank, immediately and violently pulled the aircraft to the right and straight up.
The guy yelling at the air freshener thinking it was Alexa probably thought that every time he offended it, it made its displeasure known with knotty pine scented farts directed at his face. 😂
What makes it worse is that over the last 20 years or so many studies of who spends the most time online have been done and the overwhelming data showed that about 60 to 70% of comment traffic comes from those likely from the bottom 30 to 40% of the intellectual bell curve.
It already does. AI generated images are now learning from AI generated images on the internet that were based on AI generated images on the interner, getting increasingly unhinged in the process.
The same guy who developed this tech probably saw that Black Mirror episode and say “hey that’s not a bad idea!” However, am I a bad person by thinking that it’ll be hilarious to embarrass my grandkids by calling while they’re using the blowjob robot ?
I'm still worried AI in real life will eventually find and misinterpret all the Sci-Fi films with AI considered the enemy such as Terminator, the Matrix, Age of Ultron etc.
@@davidhoward4715 No euphemism, I was enjoying a bowl of chocolate pudding after lunch when I saw that bit of the routine. And if you haven't watched "2 Girls 1 Cup" yet... well, you have been warned.
I would love a comedic movie that just shows an ai robot taking things too literally and is trying to learn what the phrases with double meaning actually means.
There's also the plagerism side to these algorithms. The ones used to generated images, I won't call them art as art is human expression, are almost all trained on stolen artwork whether it be images, music, voices, etc.
Define 'stolen'. If a human goes to a Gallery, looks but doesn't buy, is that theft? If a human is online and scrolls through an online Gallery, is that theft? Is it only 'theft' if a machine does it...wait a minute...humans set the machine up to peruse a virtual Gallery...are the humans at fault for the 'theft'? If 'stolen' doesn't fit, define 'theft'...
I'm not worried about art as true art is an interaction between two humans: the artist and the observer. AI can create music, a painting, a movie... and it might be entertaining, but it will never replace true art, as when you experience it you will not be moved on a human level to see/hear what another human is communicating
Speaking of AI I live in Cambridge and here in some parts of the city we have robots that deliver people’s shopping, they’ll cross the road on they’re own and thank cars and everything
there are various negative things russel didn't mention, such as AI being able to imitate voices from recordings which have been used to try and scam people e.g. pretending your daughter is kidnapped. Also adding a naked body to images of fully dressed people
Also stealing artwork, being used to profile people to law enforcement and immigration (we've seen how well that kind of AI profiling goes in job recruitment already), cheat on university assignments (perhaps not a big deal if you're studying fine art, but would you want a doctor who cheated all their assignments?), being used for hacking and spam attacks on websites, taking unsustainable resources to run, being "taught" by underpaid and exploited people in slums and refugee camps... I could go on. The the list is actually quite long. Ultimately Russel is right, the problem isn't that AI is bad, it's that the people making, selling and using it are. Unfortunately, that isn't likely to change any time soon. Billionaires aren't interested in improving quality of life for the rest of us, or providing AI labour for menial and dangerous jobs so the rest of us can be safe and healthy and have more time to be with our loved ones and create art. They're interested in providing AI labour to reduce costs to other employers and remove power from the working classes. Unless there's a truly massive financial pay off to to do otherwise, they want us doing the menial and dangerous jobs while AI spends time with our loved ones and makes art.
Peoples apprehension around AI just makes me think of the old Brasseye clip of a guy walking around holding a placard with the word *TECHNOLOGY* written on it haha.
It's not the technology I'm apprehensive about, it's the motives of the people buying and selling it and the physical cost to us and the planet in terms of non-renewable or environmentally polluting resources and exploited labour. Give me AI that replaces dangerous or menial human labour, or is tasked with improving human quality of life or solving climate issues and I'd be over the moon. It's what most Sci Fi fans have been hoping for for literally a hundred years or more. It's partially what AI was initally conceived of as being for. Hell, even a materially useless AI that's relatively harmless and entertaining would be welcome. Instead, what we get is AI that replaces (or attempts to replace) human artistry for cheaps, more efficiently racially profiles people, and more effectively invades people's privacy and terrorises and harrasses people, all while being built from finite materials mined by exploited workers, being trained by exploited workers and on stolen IP, and running on hardware that's highly resource intensive and damaging to the environment.
There are at least two fundamental problems with AI: 1) AI has a very poor understanding of context. Context is critical in understanding most things because we inevitably reduce communication to take advantage of the shared understanding of context. Context is complex and nuanced, and understanding both the significance andmeaning of something can require a truly vast store of knowledge; 2) When complex systems interact, they ultimately form new and even more complex systems between them, the full consequences of which will not have been thought through. A simple example is an email autoresponder you might set up when you're on holiday, that autoresponds to a group message, which is sent to the same distribution group, thus triggering autoresponse messages from other autoresponders of people in the group. These two very simple systems interacting (group message facility and autoresponders on individual accounts) quickly led to mail system overload and checks had to be built in to mail and messaging systems to stop this from happening. The more complex the systems that interact, the harder to spot this will be, and potentially the more dangerous the consequences before the impact is realised.
Maybe these Apps will in 50-100 years be smart enough to be called an AI. If ever. It's mainly copy&paste machines today. And some fancy cameras and gyroscopes when it comes to robotics.
Simple solution: train a massive AI with nothing but the worst of the Internet. Set it up to serve as a digital 'bad example' database. If you want to test your content for icky stuff, take it to the 'expert' system. We could call it TRUMPd. Transient Rudeness Under Massively Parallel dingleberries.
Oh yeah, I bet it would have no clue if I were to show it any of my pictures while I was in show choir. Because it learns from the prejudices of humans, it also has their prejudices.
But can we please keep it away from art and creative writing? Last I checked automation was supposed to free us up to focus on that sort of thing, not do it instead so we are free to do menial labor.
I feel pretty superior as long as AI has problems to tell Samuel Jackson, Halle Berry and any random person wearing a dark t-shirt apart. In the very moment this changes, all bets are off - for better or for worse.
Though ai is here and it's staying. It will and is a part of our lives. But theirs still alot of work needing to refine the programming. If we can get star wars like droids we'll be okay. Similar to the three laws of robotics but we still need to refine the programming so it can keep to the right standards that cannot fully replace humans but needs us as much as we need it. It can be used to help but its the matter of how we restrict and be aware of our actions Its like the magic haddock, ai isn't bad or good but different. We just need to be responsible with it.
Here is why I read comments on RUclips videos anymore! The chance of finding my exact thought written out by a complete stranger is too tantalizing. Russell cracks me right up but I often have to pause for breaks even during his shorter videos.
There's definitely no artificial intelligence with Russel Howard. Absolutely brilliant and spot on. I am not a robot!
Exactly what a robot would say 🤔
@@blindmown Malfunction, malfunction.
@@Vee-jc1qherror
Russle Howard is a fool
@@jamesmorgan7629 ???
My two favorites are:
1) Lawyers used ChatGTP to prepare a brief for the court. When the judge checked the cited decisions, he found out that they either did not exist or the decision was grossly misinterpreted.
2) When an Artificial Idiot was used to diagnose skin lesions, it determined the lesion was cancerous when there was a ruler in the picture.
AI are there to help, not to decide and are as good as the data they are fed. So dumb Ais are quite often the result of dumb input.
The legal industry is literally one of the most vulnerable industries to be replaced with AI. One example of failure does not equate to the huge increase in efficiency that AI has introduced to the legal industry across the board. Lawyers are definitely going to be losing their jobs. If done correctly, AI can replace a whole host of jobs. The entire global economy is going to need a re-work because of it, and people affected by it the most will likely gain a universal income of some sorts due to the taxation of the robots that have replaced their industries. You will basically be gaining an income just for existing.
The skin cancer AI was 100% default of the developers. If you're going to poison the well of the data set you can't be surprised at the outcome is useless. Every single example of cancer had a ruler in the image and all of the examples of non-cancerous growth didn't have a ruler in the image.
There is blame to be laid here but it's not at the feet of the AI it's at the idiot researchers who did think it through.
Always remember: Garbage In, Garbage Out - GIGO.
Russle
That robot feeding the baby. I almost choked laughing.
Am I a bad person?
Not at all, unless I am too 😂
I had to bury my face in my pillow before I woke up the household. You are not alone.
It’s not, it’s kinda funny
@@Boyakishan I rewound it more than a dozen times, I shared it 20 times and I’m still laughing 3 days later.
Convinced there is a special layer waiting for me in hell.
If that's what you think, sure. But it's just a clip on the internet. It's bad, but it's not what you wanna do to a child sooooo@@figplucker908
If robots take out humanity, it'll likely be because someone showed it social media as a learning method.
Ultron: Saw the internet, decided humans had to die
Honestly, even as a human, one look at social media and I think humanity doesn't deserve to live.
I thought back to Russell's reference to computers taking things literally/misinterpresting when I read this. "Computer, take out humanity". (later) Computer says: "We went out. I had the fish, humanity ordered the chicken. A lovely evening was had by all."
I believe that they did and the AI went totally fascist. They shut it down.
See Tom Cardys song Artificial Intelligence. Relevant.
A true comedic genius and social realist.
I'm not worried about artificial intelligence, I'm worried about natural stupidity.
I've been A-B testing certain types of comments on the YT comment section for a while now. I still can't tell which are just illiterate tools and which are repurposed AI chatbots that can't read text formats that humans should be able to figure out in seconds.
@@russianbot4418Well that’s ironic coming from yourself! 😂
@@centuri6510 It's Okay, I'm open-source and thus highly adaptable. 😃
who do you think is inputting data into this monstrosity?
@@Kayenne54 I think you are
Theres a streamer that played chess against chatGPT. It was awful at it. AI programs are only designed to do one specific job, so getting an AI designed to mimic human speech and get it to do just about anything else and it will always do it completely wrong.
True AI is still very, very fary away.
Keep in mind... What we have now, is as bad as it will ever be.
This is the start, not the peak.
Also when it comes to single use ai, that's not necessarily true as even gpt has plugins which allows it to interact in other ways.
Am I personally worried? As a musician and artist? No. There's already some fantastic ML projects that clones voices almost perfectly and can generate music really damn similar to what I would write.
But at the end of it all, these are just tools and tools by themselves aren't evil. How we use them, that's the issue.
Artificial Super Intelligence(ASI) is what people should be concerned about and what extremely intelligent people like Stephen Hawking have raised serious concerns about(BBC - Stephen Hawking warns artificial intelligence could end mankind - 2 December 2014).
If we reach technological singularity, things can very quickly get out of human hands. AI as it is isn't particularly scary but will lead to massive job loss/economic restructuring on a scale that humans have never encountered. Factory level machine automation job loss would pale in comparison.
If we'll ever create ASI remains to be seen although IMO it will happen in the not too distant future. Its implications we can never know. It may be the best of times, it may be the worst of times(it could be the age of wisdom, it could be the age of foolishness, sorry, had to).
ChatGPT-4 can call on other AIs. So, in a year, if you want to play chess against chatGPT, it will just call on an AlphaGo extension and crush anyone lol That is the thing with AIs can work as agents for each other. Besides, these models were not "programmed" as such. They learned by themselves, so they can develop habilities that were not expected like how language models can in some cases model physics or create music.
When ai is using quantum computers that's where we lose it
but it does give great cuddles! ^w^
Howard is the funniest British comedian out today. He should take this show to the states
@johnjordan3527 what does that have to do with my comment?
He’s saying your taste is weak bruh, which it is, the guys being doing the same shtick since Good News when I was like 10, don’t get me wrong he’s entertaining and enjoyable to watch but funniest uk comedian today? Crazy statement
The problem with Artificial intelligence is that it can be stupid in ways we can’t predict or understand. It’s the Black Box problem.
Yup. The real danger is that we trust without verifying
Similar to the people that its modelling? :)
@@barcelonachair6487 You could say that but unlike a human an AI can't rationalize itself, it's just trying to operate within the parameters of it's programming which adds a new layer of unpredictability.
All of this going on and me? I'm (still) terrified people read "nuclear" as if it was spelled "nucular" (2:34)
Mine is the incessant usage of “should of”…
High five!!! I've had to delete so many rants about that word, spoken like that, from so many YT videos...If I'd left them I'd be banned off the site. My next most hated mispronounced word is "Acrost" instead of "across". There is NO FREAKING T in that word...sorry. Lost my composure. Hearing people in interviews saying "I axed about that" instead of "asked", "I drugged him out of the house" instead of "I dragged..." And anyone under forty years of age whose every second word is "Like". And "it is what it is" has now made it to No: 5 in my most disliked expressions.
Thanks Dubya.
I love this guy😂😂...much love from Kenya🇰🇪🇰🇪
The more I learn about the development of AI in my studies, the more I get scared of the effects of capitalism on AI development.
If AI projects are funded by the people, and the primary motivation behind them is making the world a better place for everyone, I think it'll probably mostly be fine.
But, when an AI projects are funded by a few people who are primarily motivated by getting a return on investment, that is when we get misaligned and dangerous AI products released upon the world to turn a profit.
Baby feeding robot needs it’s own series
I heard a fun story about AI. A coding camp/class/competition was challenged to create an AI to play Poker. The Winner was just programmed to go All In every time and the more sophisticated AI systems couldn't respond properly to it.
Heh, that sounds about like half the people I play against online already! Those fools take all the fun out of playing.
Foundational large language models can be quite good in getting the nuances in language right, that is something they can be trained on with large amounts of text.
However, they are not as good in getting niche facts right. Essentially they generate the next message that is missing in a conversation, so when you're asking questions about some specific fact, you're not querying a database (well, maybe a vector-database, but that's not helping to make a point here). You're asking a question, so it generates an answer (which is what is missing in the conversation), but the facts in that answer are based on probability, and might be completely wrong, but brought verry convicingly.
Using a multi-million dollar fighter simulator, AI was tested using voice input. The AI would ask if it were performing correctly after each command and it was supposed to be learning how to perform maneuvers literally and instantly. Well, it certainly was taking things quite literally. After ordering the AI to perform a simple left banking turn while holding the g's to a precise 2.2 g's, it asked if it were performing correctly. The pilot commanding the AI said, "That's right. Keep it up." The AI, while in a left bank, immediately and violently pulled the aircraft to the right and straight up.
nah, I'm not read that shit
@@harryallen6051An AI took something literally and plane went right up
@@harryallen6051 Oh, and because you didn't read about a failed SIMULATOR experiment it didn't happen??? Got it. /smh
@@itsjustme8947I don't see anywhere in his comment where he claimed it never happened.
@@harryallen6051 Then don’t read the bloody comment.
The guy yelling at the air freshener thinking it was Alexa probably thought that every time he offended it, it made its displeasure known with knotty pine scented farts directed at his face. 😂
If AI learns from the internet, and the output of AI is published on the internet, eventually AI will be learning from AI. That could be interesting.
What makes it worse is that over the last 20 years or so many studies of who spends the most time online have been done and the overwhelming data showed that about 60 to 70% of comment traffic comes from those likely from the bottom 30 to 40% of the intellectual bell curve.
It already does. AI generated images are now learning from AI generated images on the internet that were based on AI generated images on the interner, getting increasingly unhinged in the process.
Yes. We'll end up being only permitted to use one word in any discussion. *"LIKE".*
AI Incest.
using AI to talk to deceased loved ones was a black mirror episode a number of years ago
The same guy who developed this tech probably saw that Black Mirror episode and say “hey that’s not a bad idea!”
However, am I a bad person by thinking that it’ll be hilarious to embarrass my grandkids by calling while they’re using the blowjob robot ?
I'm still worried AI in real life will eventually find and misinterpret all the Sci-Fi films with AI considered the enemy such as Terminator, the Matrix, Age of Ultron etc.
Yes!!!! Give him a show!!!!!
He's been on sky tv for the past 10 years.
I was eating chocolate pudding when the 2 Girls 1 Cup joke showed up. Thanks, Russell! 🤣
Okay, I give up. What's "eating a chocolate pudding" a euphemism for?
@@davidhoward4715 No euphemism, I was enjoying a bowl of chocolate pudding after lunch when I saw that bit of the routine.
And if you haven't watched "2 Girls 1 Cup" yet... well, you have been warned.
GIVE THIS MAN A SHOW AGAIN, FFS!!!
He does? Just not for free.
@@zakgault4209on what channel or service ?
@@zakgault4209 Where? I will literally pay!
Thursdays on Sky 1. I think it's 11pm.
@@Shaun_3114 What's the show called please?
I love Russel Howard, makes me laugh out loud 😂
I just love the guy whose like Theres a cat in me house screaming intensly.
Do not say the phrase “it’s a fogging pig’ to the AI, you KNOW what it will do with that piglet 😱
It'll pull a Black Mirror?
* Shudders *
Russell. I've watched every season of the BBC and the sky network.
Britain and your tabloids LOL
You are a gem!
Please bring back Russell Howard’s good new it was soooo good
That last man sounded like the most disappointed drill sargent in history.
Does Russell never age!? Literally looks the same as he did 15 years ago
that last guy sounded like seeing the robot dogs scared an impromptu confession out of him
We basically created the discount store equivalent of Ultron.
The laugh from the audience after that guy had his hed smashed against the countertop 😂😂
I cannot wait to see this man later this month
I love how Jelly made an appearance on Russell Howard 😅 5:02
I would love a comedic movie that just shows an ai robot taking things too literally and is trying to learn what the phrases with double meaning actually means.
Russel!! Please keep it coming! 😂😂
you got this, take your time king
There's also the plagerism side to these algorithms. The ones used to generated images, I won't call them art as art is human expression, are almost all trained on stolen artwork whether it be images, music, voices, etc.
Define 'stolen'.
If a human goes to a Gallery, looks but doesn't buy, is that theft?
If a human is online and scrolls through an online Gallery, is that theft?
Is it only 'theft' if a machine does it...wait a minute...humans set the machine up to peruse a virtual Gallery...are the humans at fault for the 'theft'?
If 'stolen' doesn't fit, define 'theft'...
I'm not worried about art as true art is an interaction between two humans: the artist and the observer.
AI can create music, a painting, a movie... and it might be entertaining, but it will never replace true art, as when you experience it you will not be moved on a human level to see/hear what another human is communicating
how cute: they where taking the hellhound-deathmachines for a litte walk in the park
Show that AI a photograph of Piers Morgan! 😂
Speaking of AI I live in Cambridge and here in some parts of the city we have robots that deliver people’s shopping, they’ll cross the road on they’re own and thank cars and everything
We miss you man ❤
Russell, you've corrupted my image of my perfectly innocent dishwasher now. Thanks, m8.
Brilliant. As usual!
@7:35 When the robot dogs walk smoother than their handler (in blue shirt)
Didn't wake up today thinking I'd see Nickocado Avocado in a Russell Howard video...
Same, also was that jelly breaking the keyboard?
Most ambitious crossover since endgame
@@greyprincebidoof nah since the duck billed platypus
Oh damn x I love our Russell
Spot on Russel!
I do not fear AI.
I fear AI controlled by humans.
Or at least AI poorly programmed by humans
Or the humans that listen to it without thinking
7:24😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
That explains why Ultron was so messed up; he spent time on Reddit.
After watching those tiktok videos (or whatever they are), I don't understand how people worry about AI and not humans...
Omg.. that baby bottle machine.. 😮😂😂
He’s brilliant 🤩
I got one of those AI scam ads in the middle of this video
I’m with the last guy!
😂
Gotta love him!!
You would not want to be related to the last block 😂😂😂😂
That baby bottle formula was a knockout.
Thought your Nan might call out “Russ where are you” and you reply “I’m coming “ 😂
there are various negative things russel didn't mention, such as AI being able to imitate voices from recordings which have been used to try and scam people e.g. pretending your daughter is kidnapped. Also adding a naked body to images of fully dressed people
Also stealing artwork, being used to profile people to law enforcement and immigration (we've seen how well that kind of AI profiling goes in job recruitment already), cheat on university assignments (perhaps not a big deal if you're studying fine art, but would you want a doctor who cheated all their assignments?), being used for hacking and spam attacks on websites, taking unsustainable resources to run, being "taught" by underpaid and exploited people in slums and refugee camps... I could go on. The the list is actually quite long.
Ultimately Russel is right, the problem isn't that AI is bad, it's that the people making, selling and using it are. Unfortunately, that isn't likely to change any time soon. Billionaires aren't interested in improving quality of life for the rest of us, or providing AI labour for menial and dangerous jobs so the rest of us can be safe and healthy and have more time to be with our loved ones and create art. They're interested in providing AI labour to reduce costs to other employers and remove power from the working classes. Unless there's a truly massive financial pay off to to do otherwise, they want us doing the menial and dangerous jobs while AI spends time with our loved ones and makes art.
😂 thanks for a good laugh
Peoples apprehension around AI just makes me think of the old Brasseye clip of a guy walking around holding a placard with the word *TECHNOLOGY* written on it haha.
It's not the technology I'm apprehensive about, it's the motives of the people buying and selling it and the physical cost to us and the planet in terms of non-renewable or environmentally polluting resources and exploited labour.
Give me AI that replaces dangerous or menial human labour, or is tasked with improving human quality of life or solving climate issues and I'd be over the moon. It's what most Sci Fi fans have been hoping for for literally a hundred years or more. It's partially what AI was initally conceived of as being for. Hell, even a materially useless AI that's relatively harmless and entertaining would be welcome.
Instead, what we get is AI that replaces (or attempts to replace) human artistry for cheaps, more efficiently racially profiles people, and more effectively invades people's privacy and terrorises and harrasses people, all while being built from finite materials mined by exploited workers, being trained by exploited workers and on stolen IP, and running on hardware that's highly resource intensive and damaging to the environment.
I liked when he had the people using the crosswalk to represent human traffiking😂
Knock me up in the morning
Love this
There are at least two fundamental problems with AI:
1) AI has a very poor understanding of context. Context is critical in understanding most things because we inevitably reduce communication to take advantage of the shared understanding of context. Context is complex and nuanced, and understanding both the significance andmeaning of something can require a truly vast store of knowledge;
2) When complex systems interact, they ultimately form new and even more complex systems between them, the full consequences of which will not have been thought through. A simple example is an email autoresponder you might set up when you're on holiday, that autoresponds to a group message, which is sent to the same distribution group, thus triggering autoresponse messages from other autoresponders of people in the group. These two very simple systems interacting (group message facility and autoresponders on individual accounts) quickly led to mail system overload and checks had to be built in to mail and messaging systems to stop this from happening. The more complex the systems that interact, the harder to spot this will be, and potentially the more dangerous the consequences before the impact is realised.
The talking to your deceased loved ones things sound a lot like a concept in the book Ready Player Two.
was that Nickocado Avocado and ProGamerJay?! I was not expecting them in russel howard
AI is truly halarious at times 😂
Reference to 2001? I do hope
so...
@@ripdbtpoo1441 ?
Fantastic 😂😂😂
Maybe these Apps will in 50-100 years be smart enough to be called an AI. If ever.
It's mainly copy&paste machines today. And some fancy cameras and gyroscopes when it comes to robotics.
Artifical intelligence is nothing new.
It has been around for centuries.
A. I. is more commonly known as Career Politicians.
The last letter in A.I. debunks ýour claim.
😂
Just commenting for the algorithm ❤️🧡
0:09 I honestly thought you said w@nking lol
The Black Mirror dogs at the end of the video concerned me
Simple solution: train a massive AI with nothing but the worst of the Internet.
Set it up to serve as a digital 'bad example' database.
If you want to test your content for icky stuff, take it to the 'expert' system.
We could call it TRUMPd.
Transient
Rudeness
Under
Massively
Parallel
dingleberries.
Freaking hilarious! 😂
Omg can't stop laughing 😂😂
The frame interlacing is showing in your video capture.
AI aint no joke... All hail our new master... ;D
Oh yeah, I bet it would have no clue if I were to show it any of my pictures while I was in show choir. Because it learns from the prejudices of humans, it also has their prejudices.
It’s not the videos on the internet that messed up the “AI”. It was the text.
Russell is hilarious. Thanks for the laughs, and just a heads up…tRump is buying a flat down the street from you mate.
I love it it’s hilarious but sadly so true .
There’s a story in I, Robot by Issac Asimov called Little Lost Robot. Guess what the last order it was given.
Oh it can guess can it? Wow incredible... 😂
If I were Rusty , AI would have to be the scariest ...
0:56 who said from the 90s
As RUssell got a glass eye
Anyone else remember this video?
But can we please keep it away from art and creative writing? Last I checked automation was supposed to free us up to focus on that sort of thing, not do it instead so we are free to do menial labor.
Yet when humans do it we call it groundless stereotyping
I feel pretty superior as long as AI has problems to tell Samuel Jackson, Halle Berry and any random person wearing a dark t-shirt apart. In the very moment this changes, all bets are off - for better or for worse.
Though ai is here and it's staying. It will and is a part of our lives. But theirs still alot of work needing to refine the programming. If we can get star wars like droids we'll be okay. Similar to the three laws of robotics but we still need to refine the programming so it can keep to the right standards that cannot fully replace humans but needs us as much as we need it. It can be used to help but its the matter of how we restrict and be aware of our actions
Its like the magic haddock, ai isn't bad or good but different. We just need to be responsible with it.
How can someone be this entertaining and annoying at the same time 😆🤣🤣🤣
Here is why I read comments on RUclips videos anymore! The chance of finding my exact thought written out by a complete stranger is too tantalizing. Russell cracks me right up but I often have to pause for breaks even during his shorter videos.
We’re also scared of AI because we’ve seen The Terminator and The Matrix. Neither went well.
Oh god… now I’m actually curious how else an AI could interpret “two girls, one cup”.
Hey Alexa
''too much technology''-mr roboto