There are plenty of "real" street hot rods. My 1968 Barracuda fastback is powered by a 400 based 512 stroker backed by an A833 4 speed manual. It's very street able, performs well and runs cool, all on pump gas.
That’s good stuff. I like the Vortec heads, Ive used them several times. My favorite was on a 400sbc with a Summit 1103 cam. Torque for days in a C10. I’ve always wanted to build a Vortec headed motor using a circle track lift rule cam, .450 lift, lots of duration, and a tight LSA
Thank you. I have one of those cams it is 246@.050 and 250@.050 duration .420 lift cam on a 106 lsa. I was thinking I would start with a stock 882 sbc head then put on the vortec heads to see the difference with the cam. Then upgrade to 1.6 ratio rockers.
Just subbed! I’ve been working on a 72 C10. 400sbc, comp 274 cam, performer intake. I want to get some vortec heads or cheap aluminum. Can’t wait to watch more of your content!
I ran a similar engine about 25 yrs ago. It was a 355 at one point and a 383 at another time. -780 holley -holley street dominator intake -double hump heads, cleaned up with 2.02 -comp 292 cam, comp 280 cam, and lunati 305. -1.5 roller rocker -TH350 w/3200 stall -1969 C10 with 4.10 gears Truck ran low 13s
That is a good running truck. I have a 1977 c20 I will be testing with over the next few months. I would be very happy if I get it into the 13 second range. I think I will be starting in the 18 second range.
@Nyle Green Obviously, cylinder head and transmission selection is faaar better than than 40-50 yrs ago. Well, engines too for that matter. You can have a high 13 second, 20mpg truck without too much fuss.
Miss that Holley intake 300-36. KIller high rise, dont know why Holley quit making them Loaned it, and an early vic jr buddy moved to Mx and never gave them back lol Friends...
Nice build 👍🏾😎🏁🏁🏁 seems it really hit in the mid range. I'm struggling with my VORTEC 355 and I'm running the 7501intake with 650cfm CARBURETOR. Cant wait to see your 355 build. 👌🏽
Nice. Im going to be running a tight lash solid flat tappet in the 355 it will be on a budget. I hope my videos will be informative. Good luck with your build.
Beautiful car! I have a 355 in my 71 Chevelle with vortec heads and the same springs and screw in rocker studs,i'm running the Lunati voodoo 268 cam right now because I was told that the vortecs won't flow that 292h cam and that cam also needs high compression,but it looks like it's working great on your set up.
I like the budget build stuff. I’m trying to see how fast I can go with vortec heads. So far the best I’ve gone is 7.92 blowing the tires off 2.19 60ft. It did run 95.5mph in the 1/8th. Stock 350 vortec heads, lunati cam, 10lbs of boost from a procharger in a 3800lb pickup truck.
Nice!! That is what i do budget builds. I don't have much into this build its a stock gen 1 bottom end, stock vortec heads, and a flat tappet cam with LS6 valve springs. Your truck is going to fly when it gets traction. I will have some videos of a c20 coming up with different motors in it. Good luck!
Nice! I have 2 or 3 motors ahead of it right now. When I test the high rev vortec 355 I was going to do a transmission comparison. I have a powerglide with a higher stall that should work better with it. I will use it to compare the transmissions.
I subscribed just to see more real budget style street cars. I'm trying to do the same on my channel. Seems like if you're not making 1500-2000hp people think you're slow now days. Keep it up
Nice i love budget performance based builds. That is what I'm trying to do. I will not have alot money into the engine builds. I will check out your channel.
This a nice cam. It sounded nice and had decent midrange. I would like to see if a cam with less duration and a tighter lobe separation would be better suited for this engine. I will try it out eventually and report back with a video.
Ah, the often overlooked and underrated 700dp. It has the same secondary venturi size as the 750 but a little smaller primary venturi to help with low speed drivability.
I agree. This one has stock dished pistons , vortec heads and a long duration cam. I wasn't sure how it would work out. I do not think there was any spark knock and could of ran on 87 octane. I would like to experiment with detonation and quench to see the effects. I do have a motor that has spark knock. I have associated that with oil consumption and a lack of proper tuning. Thanks for the comment.
What is your rearend setup? What gear and are leaf’s in factory location?? Also what size rear wheel/tire combo? Thanks I have a 66 I’m putting together also.
sweet car, sounds great, but why a wet burnout and then not stage in the rubber zone? Does the wet burnout help heat up the tires, seems like it would be a lube and not let get propper heat
@@mikewillett5076 I would like to try to optimize this engine with a different cam and intake. I need to do some research on cam selection. It would interesting to see what a more optimized cam would do.
@@nylegreen261 . You might already know but as a general rule, going to a tighter lobe separation helps dynamic compression/makes up for compression being low vs the size of the cam. Is yours the Comp 292 hydraulic? If so it's on a 110 lobe separation. If you're trying to stay hydraulic, the Isky Mega Cam 292 also has 244° @ .050" and same lift but is on 108° LSA. (They even make the same cam on a 106° LSA but probably more picky with the tune.) Of course check with them or other companies and see what they say. Either way, your car runs great!
@@mikewillett5076 Its the comp cams. I have four 9 to 1 vortec headed sbc engines. Engine one ft 212/222 .435 .460 ls 112.5. Engine 2 hr 220/224 .495 .502 114 ls. Engine 3 hr 230/244 .510 .540 112 ls. Engine 4 ft 244/244 .501 .501 110 ls. Im looking for a cam around a 230/236 on a 106 ls to try. It would be interesting if it picked up over the other camshafts. I still have engine 2 and 3 to test in the car first. Just looking ahead. Thank you.
Awesome job brother Im not knocking your build but I think the intake is to big for your set-up unless you have high compression I think a performer RPM air gap would work phenomenal love the car 🤙
Sweet engine! Question tho as I’m still a novice: I always hear you want a 4 bolt main over and over. I noticed you said you used a 2 bolt. I’m guessing if you know what you’re doing and build it right the 2 bolt will hold it together? As I said I’m still learning but I love the car and channel. Definitely subbed!
A 2 bolt 350 with stock bolts is fine for up to 6000+ naturally aspirated, 6500+ with good aftermarket bolts. I know a guy who's taken em over 7000 semi regularly with stock bolts and they held, but there was evidence of "cap walk". But they didn't break.
Thank you. I haven't experienced any problems with 2 bolt blocks. I usually keep them under 6500 rpm's. All my 2 bolt 350's sbc have been under 400 horsepower though. I have had a couple of 2 bolt main 400 sbc's with aftermarket bolts that were shifted at 7000 rpm and im guessing 500 horsepower.
Right now I have 2 dual planes that fit a performer and air gap performer rpm. I was thinking I could try the rpm air gap to see if there is a performance difference. Thank you I will look into the 300-36.
All time fav, look better than the orig Z/28 intake. Used one on a 10.2-1 350 ISky 280 mega headers 650 DP I was shocked at how hard the power hit in that thing.
Here is a 2 bolt 350 that i built years ago. had a cast crank from autozone .010 .010, vortec 5.7 rods, 10.5 to 1 compression ratio, 4.030 bore, forged pistons, 186 heads cut to 2.02 and 1.60, 268H extreme energy comp cam with matching springs for cam. holly duel plane manifold. ruclips.net/video/5IVu9tu9UCI/видео.html
@@nylegreen261I built a similar engine, used a big singleplane at first, then I swapped a dualplane intake on it, seemed to pick up low end torque, but lost alot up top. If your running a 3500 stall, I'd stick with the singleplane. All the gains were below 3500 that I could tell with the dualplane. Felt like it lost 25hp up top. I run a manual trans, so my stall is adjustable. It ran better with the singleplane tho. I had it in a truck is why I swapped the intakes.
@@thereluctantgearhead4544 . That's good info. I've seen dyno pulls (on a 406 at that) and the single plane was worth only maybe 10hp at the top (over 5200) but lost considerable torque through the midrange (from 3000-5000ish) vs the RPM. Guess it just boils down to the combo.
![700HP Supercharged LSA Chevy Nova SLEEPER! [4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/SsvgPlBT4xE/mqdefault.jpg)
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
I wish there was more real " street cars" now days. I've seen guys running 1000 + hp in a tube chassis car and call it a street car.
There are plenty of "real" street hot rods. My 1968 Barracuda fastback is powered by a 400 based 512 stroker backed by an A833 4 speed manual. It's very street able, performs well and runs cool, all on pump gas.
Just ran across your channel and I'm really digging the series man! Straight to the point, no fluff subbed!
Thank you
Very nice Chevy Nova.
Nice build.
Sounds good.
I like solid reliable platforms.
Just subscribed to your channel.
Thanks for sharing.
Take care, Ed.
Thank you
That’s good stuff. I like the Vortec heads, Ive used them several times. My favorite was on a 400sbc with a Summit 1103 cam. Torque for days in a C10.
I’ve always wanted to build a Vortec headed motor using a circle track lift rule cam, .450 lift, lots of duration, and a tight LSA
Thank you. I have one of those cams it is 246@.050 and 250@.050 duration .420 lift cam on a 106 lsa. I was thinking I would start with a stock 882 sbc head then put on the vortec heads to see the difference with the cam. Then upgrade to 1.6 ratio rockers.
@@nylegreen261 if you do that, let me know!!
Yes sure ..!
1003 or 1103?
Love those shoebox! Sounds really good and runs hard. Nice build and look forward to the other engines! Just sunscribed!
Thank you.
My new favorite channel!
Thank you.
All that work ! thank you videoing it too so we can enjoy the ride with you 😊
Nice thank you. The work wasn't to bad. I think i got lucky more than anything.
Just subbed! I’ve been working on a 72 C10. 400sbc, comp 274 cam, performer intake. I want to get some vortec heads or cheap aluminum. Can’t wait to watch more of your content!
I ran a similar engine about 25 yrs ago. It was a 355 at one point and a 383 at another time.
-780 holley
-holley street dominator intake
-double hump heads, cleaned up with 2.02
-comp 292 cam, comp 280 cam, and lunati 305.
-1.5 roller rocker
-TH350 w/3200 stall
-1969 C10 with 4.10 gears
Truck ran low 13s
That is a good running truck. I have a 1977 c20 I will be testing with over the next few months. I would be very happy if I get it into the 13 second range. I think I will be starting in the 18 second range.
@Nyle Green Obviously, cylinder head and transmission selection is faaar better than than 40-50 yrs ago. Well, engines too for that matter. You can have a high 13 second, 20mpg truck without too much fuss.
Miss that Holley intake 300-36. KIller high rise, dont know why Holley quit making them
Loaned it, and an early vic jr buddy moved to Mx and never gave them back lol
Friends...
Nice build 👍🏾😎🏁🏁🏁 seems it really hit in the mid range. I'm struggling with my VORTEC 355 and I'm running the 7501intake with 650cfm CARBURETOR. Cant wait to see your 355 build. 👌🏽
Nice. Im going to be running a tight lash solid flat tappet in the 355 it will be on a budget. I hope my videos will be informative. Good luck with your build.
Super Nova sounds great
Thank you
Beautiful car! I have a 355 in my 71 Chevelle with vortec heads and the same springs and screw in rocker studs,i'm running the Lunati voodoo 268 cam right now because I was told that the vortecs won't flow that 292h cam and that cam also needs high compression,but it looks like it's working great on your set up.
Thanks that cam worked and sounded better than expected. I really like that behive setup. Good luck on your build.
@@nylegreen261 thank you!👍
I like the budget build stuff. I’m trying to see how fast I can go with vortec heads. So far the best I’ve gone is 7.92 blowing the tires off 2.19 60ft. It did run 95.5mph in the 1/8th. Stock 350 vortec heads, lunati cam, 10lbs of boost from a procharger in a 3800lb pickup truck.
Nice!! That is what i do budget builds. I don't have much into this build its a stock gen 1 bottom end, stock vortec heads, and a flat tappet cam with LS6 valve springs. Your truck is going to fly when it gets traction. I will have some videos of a c20 coming up with different motors in it. Good luck!
7.9 @95, that’s fantastic time and speed.
That's bout all a guy could need killer street setup
99 ext cab S10 5sp 355V8 Vortec heads with cam headers and pro Comp alum intake and shorty headers with 410 in rear. She's a fun ride
Nice Sounds like a fun truck. A 5 speed would be a blast.
I enjoy your videos , i just subscribed
Nice thank you.
We used those combos in the late 90s early 2000s. Ran 7.80-90 with 1.6 60’. Great street drivability
It's hard to go wrong with a small block chevy 350 or 406.
I’m ready for that high rev 355
Nice! I have 2 or 3 motors ahead of it right now. When I test the high rev vortec 355 I was going to do a transmission comparison. I have a powerglide with a higher stall that should work better with it. I will use it to compare the transmissions.
I subscribed just to see more real budget style street cars. I'm trying to do the same on my channel. Seems like if you're not making 1500-2000hp people think you're slow now days. Keep it up
Nice i love budget performance based builds. That is what I'm trying to do. I will not have alot money into the engine builds. I will check out your channel.
@@nylegreen261 yes sir. Keep it up, you're doing a killer job.
Nyle I'm tryin to do a 67-327 with vortecs n looking at the same cam or the 284 / 700 dp/ dual plain /lt headers - th400- 3000 stall- 4.10 s
This a nice cam. It sounded nice and had decent midrange. I would like to see if a cam with less duration and a tighter lobe separation would be better suited for this engine. I will try it out eventually and report back with a video.
Ah, the often overlooked and underrated 700dp. It has the same secondary venturi size as the 750 but a little smaller primary venturi to help with low speed drivability.
Your doing a good job
Thank you
That's real no prep racing right there. Thing hooks!
Yes it does well. When I go up in power i will have to find a better area to test.
No quench with that deck clearance. Doing ok on pump gas. I shoot for 35-40 including gasket.
I agree. This one has stock dished pistons , vortec heads and a long duration cam. I wasn't sure how it would work out. I do not think there was any spark knock and could of ran on 87 octane. I would like to experiment with detonation and quench to see the effects. I do have a motor that has spark knock. I have associated that with oil consumption and a lack of proper tuning. Thanks for the comment.
Most stock engines the pistons are in the hole cause its not been decked, in that cause even with no head gaskets u cant get that .o40 quench
Seems to run real good! Nice array of small blocks you have🙂
Thank you
What is your rearend setup? What gear and are leaf’s in factory location?? Also what size rear wheel/tire combo? Thanks I have a 66 I’m putting together also.
Nice. 12 bolt stock width with 9inch housing ends. 33 spline axles, spool and 4.56 gear. Leaf springs moved in 3 inches. Mini tub. 15x8 wheel 5.5backspacing. 29x10 hoosier.
@@nylegreen261 . Cool car! You know what I like most of all? You reply to comments, unlike so many who "abandon their posts".
@@mikewillett5076I agree with you, alot folks looking for advice.
Nova sounds so good! What mufflers/exhaust setup?
At this time it had a set of 3 inch jegs mufflers.
sweet car, sounds great, but why a wet burnout and then not stage in the rubber zone? Does the wet burnout help heat up the tires, seems like it would be a lube and not let get propper heat
I didn't put much thought into it. When it no longer works I will have to adjust.
Where do you live Nyle Green?
A few miles outside of morris illinois. 70 miles west of Chicago.
What converter and gear are you using? Had that combo many yrs back just different heads
4.56 and a 3500ish stall were just about right
When changing out the trans a couple of months ago. I found out the converter is actually a 3000 stall b&m. The gear is a 4.56
Would like you to do a budget build on a 383 with stock t.b.i.heads instead of vortec it's all about the torque thanks for the great video's.
Hold up, your piston is 33 thou in the hole?
Yes I have checked 5 motors recently and they have a range of .033 to .045. I will address this in the future.
Pretty normal state of affairs if you are using a stock piston and the block has not been decked. I've seen up to 55 thou in the hole on a Dodge 440.
What gear in rear end?? Th350 for trans??
4.56 gear. Th350 3500 stall
What’s the compression ratio ?
It is right at 9 to 1
@@nylegreen261 . Even more impressive because a cam that big "isn't supposed to" work well with that low of compression. Runs and sounds great!
@@mikewillett5076 I would like to try to optimize this engine with a different cam and intake. I need to do some research on cam selection. It would interesting to see what a more optimized cam would do.
@@nylegreen261 . You might already know but as a general rule, going to a tighter lobe separation helps dynamic compression/makes up for compression being low vs the size of the cam. Is yours the Comp 292 hydraulic? If so it's on a 110 lobe separation. If you're trying to stay hydraulic, the Isky Mega Cam 292 also has 244° @ .050" and same lift but is on 108° LSA. (They even make the same cam on a 106° LSA but probably more picky with the tune.) Of course check with them or other companies and see what they say. Either way, your car runs great!
@@mikewillett5076 Its the comp cams. I have four 9 to 1 vortec headed sbc engines. Engine one ft 212/222 .435 .460 ls 112.5. Engine 2 hr 220/224 .495 .502 114 ls. Engine 3 hr 230/244 .510 .540 112 ls. Engine 4 ft 244/244 .501 .501 110 ls. Im looking for a cam around a 230/236 on a 106 ls to try. It would be interesting if it picked up over the other camshafts. I still have engine 2 and 3 to test in the car first. Just looking ahead. Thank you.
What gear and converter do you have ?
Tci 3500 stall. 4.56 rear gear
@@nylegreen261 nice! You say that you've had it down the quarter? What are you turning when you cross the line?
@@Ridinfixinman it was a little over 6000 rpm
@@nylegreen261 thanks man.
Big G!!
I have a similar vortec setup in my monte carlo just curious about your suspension setup and tire size
29x10 Hoosier tires. Cal track split mono leafs. Front end is a AJE bolt on front suspension kit.
@@nylegreen261 thanks ready for the next videos
Awesome job brother Im not knocking your build but I think the intake is to big for your set-up unless you have high compression I think a performer RPM air gap would work phenomenal love the car 🤙
Thank you. That is something I would like to try a cam and intake swap.
Sweet engine! Question tho as I’m still a novice: I always hear you want a 4 bolt main over and over. I noticed you said you used a 2 bolt. I’m guessing if you know what you’re doing and build it right the 2 bolt will hold it together? As I said I’m still learning but I love the car and channel. Definitely subbed!
A 2 bolt 350 with stock bolts is fine for up to 6000+ naturally aspirated, 6500+ with good aftermarket bolts. I know a guy who's taken em over 7000 semi regularly with stock bolts and they held, but there was evidence of "cap walk". But they didn't break.
Thank you. I haven't experienced any problems with 2 bolt blocks. I usually keep them under 6500 rpm's. All my 2 bolt 350's sbc have been under 400 horsepower though. I have had a couple of 2 bolt main 400 sbc's with aftermarket bolts that were shifted at 7000 rpm and im guessing 500 horsepower.
@@mikewillett5076 replacing the rod bolts with ARP is one of the best things you can do for a SBC.
@@JimBronson . Yep that is true.
@@nylegreen261 Pioneer makes a good strong rod and maincap bolt, not nearly as $$ as arp. Used them for yrs
Find a Holley 300-36 intake and go with that. Best dual plane. Pulls hard to 6200
Right now I have 2 dual planes that fit a performer and air gap performer rpm. I was thinking I could try the rpm air gap to see if there is a performance difference. Thank you I will look into the 300-36.
All time fav, look better than the orig Z/28 intake. Used one on a 10.2-1 350 ISky 280 mega headers 650 DP I was shocked at how hard the power hit in that thing.
What kind of converter and stall you running
3500 stall tci
What rear gear do you have
@@stephencraig6484 4.56
Okay so how much is she going to cost me
Not yet I have some testing to do.
What compression did you end up with? Little over 10 to 1?
Right around 9 to 1
Please go to a track. If a deer, or anything runs out on the road it will not be good. Nice car.
Where he lives, that is the track.
They closed the track near Chicago lol
Performer rpm would be better it’s what I use.
Nice I have a air gap tpmb im thinking I might try it out.
Here is a 2 bolt 350 that i built years ago. had a cast crank from autozone .010 .010, vortec 5.7 rods, 10.5 to 1 compression ratio, 4.030 bore, forged pistons, 186 heads cut to 2.02 and 1.60, 268H extreme energy comp cam with matching springs for cam. holly duel plane manifold. ruclips.net/video/5IVu9tu9UCI/видео.html
Great video! Please check out my 1968 Barracuda fastback powered by a rowdy 512 stroker backed by an A833 4 speed manual. I think you'll approve. 👌
Thank you. Sounds good.
Shifting a little early
You think 6200 is early for that cam and heads???
A single plane intake, with a 750DP with 84(!!) sq jetting??? On a low compression350 with mediocre heads?? Talk about an imbalanced combination.
I appreciate the input. Im always looking for advice to pick up e.t.
Your car B's
Thank you
Another fake video. You ain't running 12.0 in the 1/4 on a hydraulic cam. Take through the cronodek at a real track.
It would run quicker with a higher mph at the track.
Who is fake, Trillion dollar man?
@@lucasdespain6604 CNN
To think an electric car can make it look slow.
I dont think I have to worry about that around me. All I see are chevy volts LOL..
That's why I chose the 292 because the vortecs quit flowing at 500 lift
I was thinking the same thing. Im thinking I might throw i dual plane intake on it and try it again.
yeah they have a lot of those .500 max lift cams for class racing. not like you couldnt use them on vortecs with a beehive upgrade on the street.
@@nylegreen261I built a similar engine, used a big singleplane at first, then I swapped a dualplane intake on it, seemed to pick up low end torque, but lost alot up top. If your running a 3500 stall, I'd stick with the singleplane. All the gains were below 3500 that I could tell with the dualplane. Felt like it lost 25hp up top. I run a manual trans, so my stall is adjustable. It ran better with the singleplane tho. I had it in a truck is why I swapped the intakes.
@@thereluctantgearhead4544 I think you might be right. Im just trying to see if I can get a little more out of it before I move on.
@@thereluctantgearhead4544 . That's good info. I've seen dyno pulls (on a 406 at that) and the single plane was worth only maybe 10hp at the top (over 5200) but lost considerable torque through the midrange (from 3000-5000ish) vs the RPM. Guess it just boils down to the combo.