Bronwyn Bishop clashes with Nick Reece on Voice to Parliament
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 14 июн 2023
- Former Speaker of the House Bronwyn Bishop and Melbourne Deputy Lord Mayor Nicholas Reece have clashed on air during a heated discussion over the Indigenous Voice to Parliament.
VOTE NO - The voice is divisive and wrong on principle!
Go Bronwyn put Nickolas in his place. He is a very rude man.
Ignorant to boot. They often go together.
He is a utter jerk.
And soooo revoltingly arrogant. Thinks his way is THE way. Well … NO way.
He is a typical lefty, completely intolerant and obnoxiously rude.
I’m voting NO
Me too. So is my wife and everyone I speak to on the subject.
Good on you it a NO here also
Me too
So am I, and everyone i know is too.
I find it strange that some believe putting race into the constitution is not racist
It’s because people like nick think aboriginal people are inferior and white superior so he virtue signals in order to appease. Plus he’s a sociopath and socialist
A no vote is the only way to keep Australians as one..not divided on who you happen to be
AA is following orders from UKW
The desperation in Reece's voice gives it away
Aboriginals are not Australians they belong to their tribal nation and are not subjects of the Queen , so who’s being divided ?
Aboriginals already have their own voice.
FREAKING NO, NO, NO. ENOUGH OF THIS MORONIC SELF DESTRUCTION.
5 reasons to vote NO: If only 1 is true, vote NO.
1. Permanent racial division at the Constitutional level.
2. High RISK of corruption with no way of reversing it.
3. High RISK of permanent poltiticization of membership.
4. Permanent duplication of existing powers. WASTE of money.
5. No way of ensuring future loyalty to the rest of Australians.
Yes, the UN for one.
VOTE NO TO THE U.N. VOICE - "Australia ‘needs to become a republic..’ .. Bandt calls for change.. Bandt tweeted : “Rest In Peace Queen Elizabeth II. Our thoughts are with her family and all who loved her.... Now Australia must move forward. We need Treaty with First Nations people, and we need to become a Republic.”
" ..The federal Labor government had already flagged its intention to hold a referendum on a republic if elected for a second term, with the prime minister earlier creating the new position of assistant minister for the republic for Matt Thistlethwaite.." ** Kim Beasley in federal parliament 1990 - "the United Nations has given the federal government a mandate of ownership for housing, property, farms and business to government control once the republic has been declared." **
ALBOZO IN FEB - ''It’s not a radical proposition but a sensible one... A simple, vital and practical principle: that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have a say in the policies and decisions that affect their lives.''
ALBOZO 2 WEEKS AGO - "So let us not content ourselves with modest change. Let us not fill our hearts with the empty warmth of the merely symbolic."
ALBOZO EVERY DAY - "One of the things I'm trying to avoid here - there will be, as occurred at the end of the last century, when a referendum wasn't successful, people looking for all of the detail ... We're not doing that. We're not doing that. We're learning from history. What I am not going to do is to go down the cul-de-sac of getting into every detail because that is not a recipe for success."
Spot On. ALL apply so NNOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!! Or go get a brain trans-plant. Good luck though.... even Sheep's brains are expensive thanks to Labor's inflation led Nation destruction!
Lol not a single one of these idiotic points are in any way true. The vote voice is purely symbolic. There is no "special powers" like you dopes have been told. The only reason to vote no is literally if you are a racist. So own it Sky fans. Own your backwards thinking and fear of everything.
Nicolas is totally brainwashed by the socialist propaganda agenda .A TOTAL WASTE OF TIME , NO OPINION ABOUT ANYTHING WORTH LISTENING TO, SACK HIM .
PUT FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION FIRST ..........
no need. if you have a llb you would know this.
the Australian Constitution (1900) contains our right to freedom of speech and politics; Furthe, the referendum held in 1967 enshrined into the de-jure Constitution that all Australians are as one; Gough Whitlams Constitution is the Corporation known as AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT constitution; the green book (as it is widely known) has absolutely no Lawful standing on the Commonwealth Of Australia.
@@markhills3922 meanwhile most Australians are too busy watching Footy and eating Kentucky. Wasted wisdom on a land of dumb sheep.
“Every racist is going to vote no”… is this clown for real? What a disgraceful thing to say.
Thing is it isn’t illegal to be what some people a racist as far as I know
Well I must be a racist , because I am definitely voting NO, I don't want apartheid, our country divided, communism gone, and be equal with all Aussies regardless of colour. One flag, one nation always!!!
@@elainehodge9415 yep likewise!
Now on Sky, they are saying that it was disgraceful for the people that voted 'No', well I think most people that voted 'No' are the heroes, they are saving the aboringinal indigenous people for voting against the Voice. The reason I and many others voted No because it was to help them, to get on with their lives to the best of their ability with the help they need!! If the Voice had got in, do you honestly think the aboriginals would have got more, I don't think so, it would have been the same as before, elites and pollies with their hands in the cookie jar and nothing going toward those that need it. Why do you think is the reason they won't hold a RC, too many would be caught in the net me thinks. I believe Jacinta &Warren are on the right track, but no one in Government is listening, like usual!!
HOW RUDE ARE YOU NICK YOU DON'T HAVE A CASE IT'S SIMPLE NICK NO DETAILS WELL NO TO THE VOICE......WAKE UP VICTORIA
Nicholas Reece is
100%
pure
knob
No……..the only way to vote if you want to avoid apartheid. Vote No. 🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺
Vote No to Racism. Vote No to Apartheid. Vote No to The Voice.
To vote YES means voting for the division of Australia on the base of race, which in itself is the definition of racism. Vote NO for the unity and equality of ALL Australians.
Absolute rubbish.
Good on you Bronwyn this bloke needs to be educated!!
You could be educated should your IQ level improve from minus 69 😂😂.
no from me
Same with me,
VICTORIA VOTE NO TO THE VOICE WHY BECAUSE NO DEAILS NO VOTE TO THE VOICE
Already over 4000 Indigenous groups, corporations (most with tax payer funding) that have a voice across Australia we do not need any more. The money should be spent on inquiry as to why the money is not getting to the people that need it.
Simple... if you love your children VOTE NO!
Still no from me, if that makes me racist so be it.
Looking on from outside AUS it is obvious this should not be happening
I'm no because it won't change anything.
On the contrary, it will change a great deal but not in the way it's being sold. The constitutional changes I know of; Articles 25 & 51 will have a significant effect on the type of laws that get passed and the outcome of elections. And article 25 doesn't even have anything to do with indigenous people....what's that all about?!!
I agree that it won't change anything, it just highlights the issue of why the hell are we forking out $30 billion dollars a year for?
The 'YES' advocates just want us to forget all about any analysis of why the current situation is so bad, despite massive resources thrown at it, and just start a new thing, 'The Voice', which will be manned by the SAME Indigenous 'Leaders' that have made a mess of things over the last few decades !
Linda Birney has been in the Indigenous Affairs game for about 20 years in various positions, apparently it's been 20 years of failure, according to HER !
When is she going to take some responsibility for the state of Indigenous Affairs, instead of just advocating for something different?
You couldn't make this stuff up.
@@ilguitaro VOTE NO TO THE U.N. VOICE - "Australia ‘needs to become a republic..’ .. Bandt calls for change.. Bandt tweeted : “Rest In Peace Queen Elizabeth II. Our thoughts are with her family and all who loved her.... Now Australia must move forward. We need Treaty with First Nations people, and we need to become a Republic.”
" ..The federal Labor government had already flagged its intention to hold a referendum on a republic if elected for a second term, with the prime minister earlier creating the new position of assistant minister for the republic for Matt Thistlethwaite.." ** Kim Beasley in federal parliament 1990 - "the United Nations has given the federal government a mandate of ownership for housing, property, farms and business to government control once the republic has been declared." **
ALBOZO IN FEB - ''It’s not a radical proposition but a sensible one... A simple, vital and practical principle: that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have a say in the policies and decisions that affect their lives.''
ALBOZO 2 WEEKS AGO - "So let us not content ourselves with modest change. Let us not fill our hearts with the empty warmth of the merely symbolic."
ALBOZO EVERY DAY - "One of the things I'm trying to avoid here - there will be, as occurred at the end of the last century, when a referendum wasn't successful, people looking for all of the detail ... We're not doing that. We're not doing that. We're learning from history. What I am not going to do is to go down the cul-de-sac of getting into every detail because that is not a recipe for success."
@@ilguitaro Would you care to explain the reasoning for your first sentence?
Also in your second sentence are you saying you think Article 25 has been changed in a referendum?
@@David_Beames Oh, I would be happy to explain.
An online PDF was made available some weeks ago pertaining to discussions on the voice referendum. It outlined the proposed changes to the constitution. Amongst the proposed changes was to repeal article 25, meaning non citizens will become eligible to vote. This has nothing to do with the indigenous population. So I guess Albo must've thought, 'Well, while we're making changes'..........!
Funny....the ALP are planning to bring in millions of migrants....I wonder who they'll vote for??? That is just one of the red flags I discovered. There are many more. But you've done your homework, right.......?!
The constitution should be non gender and non race in order to be equal to all citizens.
the Australian Constitution (1900) is EXACTLY that; the referendum held in 1967 enshrined into the de-jurs Constitution that all Australians are as one; Gough Whitlams Constitution is the Corporation known as AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT constitution; the green book (as it is widely known) has absolutely no Lawful standing on the Commonwealth Of Australia.
And it is with out argument
😈 PUT FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION FIRST 😈😈
A much better question for the Constitution
Albanese's Voice proposal is un-Australian. It conflicts with every aspect of Australian's belief in a fair go for all. If you want to see how bad the Voice will be, just look at the Aboriginal Heritage Act introduced in Western Australia by the socialist State government. Anyone with land area in excess of 10,000 square metres is subject to the Act before you put in a fence post, remove a burnt out tree stump, dig any hole deeper than a couple of inches.
What a load of crap get to a libary or search google to find out the truth about racism targeted to Aboriginal people over the last 230 odd years. Or is the history of racism a non contributing factor in the development of a positive future for Aboriginal people.
That Nick Reece is a wacist wabbit so said Albo
😂😂Love it
I’m currently living overseas and am so distraught to see how Australia has fallen to such a racist mindset. I’m moving back home next month to ensure I can vote NO to a race based constitution. Thought we were supposed to be equal. Once again, Labor destroy all that is good.
Bronwyns still as sharp as a whip. Nick is deluded and predictable but bravo for toeing the lefty line.
Your irrelevant, whining, part time murdoch turd beehive choppergate bronnie, thanks you for sucking up 👅 and being one of her 'huge' fan club of 69 ( her favourite number).
Definitely NO from me!
What if we just don't want to pay another tax on land rent because we're already struggling to work ourselves to death... what if we don't understand what the vote means?
Why vote "Yes" to something the actual Prime minister cannot explain to us. Other than we're racist if we vote "No"? I don't owe anyone anything, I work for a living and pay my tax. Why should my skin colour suggest I owe someone else? My family heritage is diverse, made up of many different races from all parts of the world. But Im an Australian. Same as every other Australian.
Burney's 24 Aboriginal mates on million dollar salaries in Canberra doing what, frequenting the top restaurants and theatre in between making a bloody menace of themselves, yeah sure I will vote for that.
Are you being sarcastic! If you were I take it back!
@@johnmckenzie-rm3jh True enough John
Just vote no!
I hate to say it, Bishop is right on this, the high court will decide what happens when it is tested.
BTW we all vote NO!
VOTE NO EVERYONE
IT WILL BE A SAD DAY FOR AUSTRALIA IF THE YES VOTE GETS UP
If the corporations want you to vote yes then you can know for sure it's not in the public's best interests...wakey wakey
Spot on! - What's the REAL agenda behind this apart from being a distraction from important issues like the WEF agenda 2030 / Great Reset (we own nothing, they own everything) ‘smart’ surveillance cities; CBDCs to get rid of cash and have us use programmable digital currency so they can monitor and control how we spend and the WHO wishing to change the international Health Regulations to have regulatory power over governments rather than be just an advisory body (See Australia Exits the WHO for information and template letters to request an inquiry) The deadline is November for our polies to say NO to the WHO.
The first one to accuse the other of sexual assault wins.
Go!
Didnt take looneylidia long to jump on that bus did it!!!!
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@burglar42 that pig is on all fours.
😂😂😂😂👍🍻
@@burglar42 Usually she has more to do with trains .
NO
Bronny is a national treasure like Pauline and Warnie.
Do Australia's really want to vote for this, will this help our indigenous citizens???? Real voice winner : the High Court, judges will decide the conflicts
Reece you are an absolute flog!
Apparently you are a " flogging" expert with blisters as evidence 😂.
SIMPLE ........VOTE NO ....
Nick Reece if you are a yes voter you are a racist and everyone in Australia that is a yes voter is a racist . Maybe they haven't thought about it . Lydia is a racist according to her father and if you were to watch the ABC Q&A you would see an aboriginal man that said "we are only 3% but we have to be on top" is that racist? I believe so
reecey ya dope...
He is a green
He is a complete jerk
@@__Diagnosis explains it...
Bronwyn you have many Australian's that agree with everything you said!! We need to Vote NO!! Nicholas is living with his head buried in the sand, he is so ignorant!!
Au contraire, Nicholas. Please explain how creating a race-based constitution is not going to be founded on racial discrimination. What, are you going to say that we don't want to discriminate based on race, but we want a constitution that discriminates based on race? This is Orwellian double-think territory.
Ipso facto this proposal is based on racial discrimination. So if you are voting yes you are voting in favour of racial discrimination.
Perhaps you can explain why it is legitimate to call this a race based constitutional change. Are all non first nations peoples foreigners? Surely you are not contending that Aborigines are not Australians! So according to you real Australians ( those that occupied the country before white settlement) who have been subjugated to rule by European invaders can be called racist for suggesting a say in legislation that affects only them??? If you were to claim that the proposal may divide the country depending on whether you could claim aboriginality or not, it may make some sense, but to call it "Racist" is an abuse of the term, and intended to deceive.
If Nicholas is an example of a "YES" voter, I'm definitely voting, "NO".
IN my opinion The Voice is TOTALLY without merit, TOTALLY. In principle it is racist AND undemocratic. AND it is just another talkfest with no new, novel or innovate difference that would make it an effective change.
It's all interlinked with the world economic Forum and the idea of a one world gov an economy. This undefined "voice" is simply more control and the next step to a tyrannical socialist world where the elites are at the top and the masses will own nothing
NO, NO NO!!! There you go, proud “racist” here!🤷🏿♂️🤷
Lot more racists will vote yes.
BB is cool🇦🇺
Bronwyn for PM
Irrelevant, whining, part time murdoch turd ,beehive choppergate bronnie, thought she was running the country as speaker (that went well 😂 ). She thanks you for sucking up 👅 and being one of her "huge" fan club of 69 ( her favourite number).
Is he calling Jacinta Price a racist?
Its a big fat NO NO NO NO its all about albobiden wanting his name in the history book nothing less and if it gets in he will then stand down as he know its racist but he got what he wanted.
Very intelligent lady, she sure knows about the Constitutional laws.
Wise V Wanna be 10 points gets Mrs Bishop
Vote no save Australia
Vote no to the continuation of your oxygen supply 😂.
The Voice will, without doubt, divide our loving country. I endorse our indigenous people being recognised in our Constitution with all my heart, nothing else. We are One. Leave it at that.
Albo's way of bringing the country together is by a divisive Yes/No vote thus dividing the country. Nice one, Albo!
!!VOTE NO TO APARTHIED!!!
As of 5 May 2019, there have been 460 native title determinations, with a further 223 native title claims still moving through the system. Currently 40% of land in Australia has a recognised native title interest in it and this is expected to rise to 80% by2050. Does having a ''Black State'' involve splitting the country 80:20? If they intend to have a closed border as they do now in many Aboriginal controlled areas it is a bit concerning just which portion of Australia do they intend to claim? Especially when one considers that ∻85% of Aborigines already live in Urban areas and fully 33% of those live in major centres with ready access to all facilities compared to 25% of the general population, (only around 15% of Aborigines live in rural and remote areas). Surely it's not unreasonable to ask which portion of Australia's landmass they intend to partition? !!!VOTE NO TO APARTHIED!!!
2 questions in the referendum, 1 do you recognise first inhabitants? 2 do you agree to have an autonomous unelected advisory committee permanently enshrined into our constitution within the parliament? Hell NO!!
Who does not recoginise that Aborigines were the first people here? Nobody ...
everyone knows that they first arrived in Australia about 40,000- 60,000 years ago ... no one has ever denied that history.
No wonder the Melbourne City Council is a laughing stock.
According to research done on "the first inventors" Australia was settled by people from Timor, therefor the people from Timor were the first Australians. Will the people of Timor now have a voice in running the country?
But they worked out how to bang two sticks together
They haven’t explained what it is how it will work and will it affect me so I will vote no
I think that there is no point inviting extreme Lefties on any show with rational thinking people. It is time that conservatives just ignore the Left and let it get on with what it is doing best and that is slowly eat its own stupidity.
Good on you Bronwyn… that other person sounds like he’s racist against racists 🤪
WITH YOU BRONWYN ! THANKS YOU, IT,S A “NO” from ME !
Albanese is a 5 minute P.M. and has no idea what the Voice will do to Australia. VOTE NO
Well said Bronwyn !
Hello again Robbo baby. Still searching for excuses for your fired lying scum mates 😂. Irrelevant, whining, part time murdoch turd, beehive choppergate bronnie, thanks you for sucking up 👅.
Yes, Nick not all people who will vote YES are stupid, but all stupid people will vote YES.
The 26th of January 1788 and in every year since in Australia is best factually described as “Rescue Day”.
There is nothing more humiliating than a dingo trying to take control of dog kennel built for the dingo’s benefit when the dingo was not capable of building the dog kennel in the first place!
If someone rescued me from a stale stagnant position of non evolution in which I had been stuck in for 40,000 years then I would be personally surprised if I could not experience any feelings of GRATITUDE?
🇦🇺💯%
Hey bloke you got a smoke
Bishop wiped the floor with this matter
You see how divisive this Trojan horse has made us, it will be worse if it gets in!!!
Maybe it’s a Marxist plan to destabilise society
Nicholas Ree Ree Reeeece, just another lefty losing it.
Reece is the Melbourne deputy Mayor....tells you everything you need to know....
How's the ghost town called the Melbourne CBD going Nick?
What money has Nick been paid
Yes voting, would be a racist vote
How much will each of those on the Voice to parliament panel get paid each year? How much will each of their staff get paid?
When are all Aussies realise and recognise Nicholas Reece for what he really is??
A tosser?
a leftard f.,kwit
Nicholas you are a complete GOOSE
No for Me
The people who vote yes ,are slowly becoming angry because they know there on the loosing team...
Why is noone talking g a our the racist on the yes side. The vote itself is racist by definition.
It is ok to vote no.
Truth Telling: Recognition and acknowledgement : I took part and years of questions and research to really find where did we all come from:
to be continued
Racism is the educated position.
the word misinformation should be banned from politicians mouths. If they believe the other person is wrong show us documents why they are wrong
Of course the High Court will end up ruling on Voice cases. The "credible" constitutional lawyers that Nic refers to should be asked to mortgage their houses against their advice. I guarantee their opinions are not worth more than their houses.
It’s an emphatic and non-negotiable ‘No’ from me.
No means no...
NO NO NO all the way
After listening to Thomas Mayo I will be voting no.
Yes, let’s consult Choppergate, party fundraisers in the Speaker’s chambers, eye-wateringly hubris-addled swamp being 🙄 FFS Sky.
I like how the Yes Vote and (mostly) the Lefties believe that if they say it, its has to be true; just as The Narrative (TM) is more important than the Reality of the World.
If the corporations want you to vote yes then you can know for sure it's not in the public's best interests...Apart from being a distraction from important issues, what’s the REAL agenda?
Hey Nick would you sign a business contract without knowing all the details.
On ya Bronwen 👍
Nicholas! Nicholas! Lol!
Debate on the subject is just the game show for the masses. This 'Voice to Parliament' has already
passed. Come on Australia, do you really think they will leave something like this to chance?
In the months to come and on the day of the vote Australia, will probably be in recession, again...
and over 60%++ of mortgage holders in Australia will have defaulted on their ridiculous home loans.
They will most likely be living in their cars trying to figure out a safe place to park for the night from
the teenage crime wave that goes unchecked Australia wide. It is no stretch of the imagination that
voting for Apartheid, (sorry 'The Voice') will be the last thing on their minds.
Yes, it's sick and twisted but you have to admire planning and most of all the timing behind it.
These decisions are by design, their agenda, never left to chance and most certainly never be
left to the will of the little people.
Oy vey goyim 🤠🤠🤠
A yes vote is a good way to stop of choppergate