HE'S BACK!!! Sovereign Citizen Returns, But Judge Still Isn't Buying His WORD SALAD!!!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 июн 2024
- Hey guys, today we have a new video for your enjoyment. Today, we have a Sovereign Citizen who returns to court, but the judge still isn't buying his word salad... Play stupid games win stupid prizes. This is just another example of Karens being Karens in court and getting owned on camera.
1ST APPEARANCE : • Judge Engages Sovereig...
To Support The Channel :
PayPal Donation : paypal.me/TeamSkepticYT
Become A Channel Member : / @teamskeptic
Join Our Patreon : / teamskeptic
TeeSpring - teespring.com/stores/team-ske...
#Court #CourtCam #TeamSkeptic 
Развлечения
![Eminem - Houdini [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/22tVWwmTie8/mqdefault.jpg)
The answer is so simple. You can walk, run, ride a horse, fly, take a bus … any number of things without driving. Your right to travel is NOT being impeded.
I look forward to the day a judge says "You want to exercize your right to travel? Then walk." 😂
How about fly a horse?
How come none of these idiots bother to look up what the Supreme Court said about driving? In 1976 they clearly and plainly said driving is a privilege not a right. If they want to argue a right to travel the judge can ask them to point to any Supreme Court ruling that says traveling and driving are the same action exclusively. 3rd in Balen V South Carolina a Sovereign Citizen took their traveling not driving argument to the Supreme Court. They laughed and refused to hear the case. Every single one of their arguments was in that case. No jurisdiction, traveling is a right etc. He was found guilty by a local court and appealed it all the way to the Supreme Court without a single higher court hearing it because it's based on complete and total ignorance and misinterpretation of the law.
Was going to say the same thing. I have argued my rights to walk on the King's Highway at any time.
If I want to wear all black in the middle of the night then it up to me to understand that cars may kill me and it is my duty to make myself seen or get off the roadway.
In protest I may lawfully walk in the road without arrest as long as I do not attempt to stop in the road.
You can not stop the King's Highway from moving so at walking pace you are indeed travelling.
Our motorways( Freeways) wete deliberately never classed as Queen's Highway and have not converted to King's Highway. They are only open to certain types of motorised vehicle. Horses, pedestrians, disability scooters, and mopeds are banned by law.
So our laws are similar, I can travel anywhere within the 4 Countries, without official ID or licence. Clearly I need a ferry to visit Northern Ireland.
They are not able to read English instructions ...
B3sides tjat tje older clause about right to travel was added t9 keep states from taking advantage of traveller's crossing state lines.....they were price gouging...and demanding payment to enter w no state jurisdiction....and that is why STATES WERE GIVEN
POWER OVER STATUTES 💪
to protect us from federal tyranny 😮
As a juror, I would be pissed at this fool for wasting my time.
Yeah but your $5 daily stipend would probably help
@@XX-vt3gx That will buy you a Monster Energy drink to stay awake during his ramblings!
I was on a jury with such a fool. It was a lawsuit and he was asking for $50,000 for an auto acident. The other counsel offered him $20,000 in closing arguments. I suggested to the rest of the jury that we award only $10,000 plus jury fees as he had pissed us all off so much during the trial. The entire jury agreed with me within 30 seconds of deliberation. The award barely covered repair bills but no damages, no medical and NOT to pay the jury fees.
Such is the power of the courts when you play stupid games.
@@XX-vt3gx I'm sorry but I'm going to need a lot more than 5 dollars for having to listen to this knuckle dragging buffoon drone on ad nauseam before you could even begin to convince me that it wasn't a waste of my precious time.
I would find him guilty of things he wasn't even charged with.
As an observer from across the pond, I've deduced that the Constitution does state that citizens have the right to travel unhindered between states....on foot, horseback, bicycle etc, etc, but if you drive a motor vehicle, you have to abide by the road traffic laws. So you need a licence, registration and insurance. Wisconsin V Brookes demonstrates that this sort of "word salad" doesn't hold up in court.
There is such a thing as a right to travel, but it doesn't mean anything like what these "sovereign citizens" think it means. See Saenz v. Roe.
That judge is wasting her time trying to explain facts and logic and law to that kindergarten dropout....
He says he is not a citizen,so stop right here and report to ICE ,Immigration, Customs Enforcement.
That's what I keep saying. Take them at their word.
Not saying he is right, but we don’t call ICE or others cause he isn’t a citizen. We have plenty of people here legally that aren’t citizens.
Exactly. If he can’t produce a green card or valid visa to be in this country, then he needs to be deported.
They should send them to Morocco if that is where they come from but the dumbest thing is they have social security numbers and birth certificate that says they are born in the US just a stupid way to get out of charges and not pay anything
As a Citizen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland I would still expect (rightly so) to follow the Laws and Statutes of the United Sates of America should I choose to drive a Motor Veeehicle on US roads.
Register the Veeehicle
Insure the Veeehicle
Its really very simple
Calling him an idiot is an insult to idiots.
True.
You are so very right
It really is. Given his total lack of understanding of basic rights vs. privileges, statutes as law, etc., I feel this clown is one of the most goofball defendants we’ve seen making these right to travel claims. The cases he referenced were so far of field from his charges that buddy was in a different galaxy.
His mother obviously used melted crayons in his baby bottle.
He's a slouching, mumbling, rambling definition of Dunning-Kruger.
No court in America has ever stated you don't need a license to drive. Or you can ignore a license.
Why is this judge wasting the courts time?
If the court is frivolous, why is he citing court cases ?
🐿 distractions 🐿
He is cherry picking from court cases.....and leaving out the bulk of the factual information that is within,
All in the hopes that he can somehow sell this load of baloney to the court.
His citations are what's frivolous. None of the cases he mentions have any relevance to the charges against him.
@@Tedybear315 he's cherry picking but still managing to grab rotten ones!
no one ever called them smart
Stupid doesn’t begin to describe this guy.
No, but it’s a hell of a good start.
Beyond stupid!
And once again we're shown proof that a negative IQ is a real thing.
You can't fix stupid.
It's sad that the socvits spend so much time and energy studying something so fruitless like this. They'd be happier if they studied, like how to be a better person or how to grow English peas.
OMG! He's got the Bill of Rights confused with the Declaration
She’s trying to explain why it isn’t anything to do with licenses… how cute.
He ain’t going to understand rational argument.
I’m honestly annoyed with the amount of wasted delusion from that guy.
IKR? He could be channeling that delusion into a.. pamphlet... or a series of tickok's
@@scraverX pamphlet??!?!? surely you mean an indestructible tri fold!!
@@budgybottom75 they are not all at chilli's level not sure this one's carer would allow him near a laminator... those can cause burns
@@scraverX hahahaha!! gold!
He doesn’t even believe this. He just lost his driving privileges and now he found this dumb ass shit
If you hate the US system so much, leave.
Got that right!
Please do. We will escort
Just that simple 👍
They don’t hate the USA, they jut think magic words will get them off the tickets.
We will never be so lucky.
I wonder if it actually hurts to be that incompetent…..🙄🙄🙄
Unlikely. As Ricky Gervais famously said, “Remember, when you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It is only painful for others. The same applies when you are stupid."
😅😅😅😅😅😅
When he said “what dey gonna testify about?” regarding the police officers, I almost pissed my pants laughing.
Why do they let these people waste valuable court time?
Because it’s a scam. Apparently they realize that they clog up the system and take up,valuable resources and try to wear down the prosecutors and courts until they just give up.
I'm guessing the judge enjoys the chance to do something outside the usual procedural stuff.
@@gchecosse I think you’re right. 😀
It's a fine line to cut the bullshit short without giving the idiot grounds for an appeal or mistrial.
@@gchecosse wasting time with morons doesn’t sound interesting to me. It only encourages them to continue their bullshit games and I know she already has a full court docket.
Seen on a t-shirt: "We can't fix stupid ... but we can give it a court date"
Seems appropriate for these people
Fabulous.
Yes. You can travel all you like, you just can't drive.
But "the supremacy clause says that federal law trumps all state laws." Uh, no it doesn't.
Watching the way the judge handles Mr. Williams one can only conclude that she must have been a former special-ed. teacher.
A very patient judge. A very ignorant defendant.
If these People say "I am representing" and are not the person.
Then I would say,
"If you are representing the person, then I need your Bar ID. Representing yourself as an attorney without being recognized as a licensed attorney, is a Felony. And a Warrant will be issued for your arrest. And seeing as the Defendant is not present, a warrant will be issued for them too. Good bye."
Right on! 😘
No. You can represent yourSELF without a law license. You can’t represent another without one. If one doesn’t admit to being the person accused of the crime, but claims to be representing said person and they don’t have a license to practice law then THAT is illegal.
Absolutely
Many judges are doing just that.
Why doesn’t anyone say you have the right to travel by feet, bus, Uber, or horse; that doesn’t say you have the right to operate a motor vehicle?
Mate, you can travel freely where you like. Walk, run, catch a bus, catch a train, no problem in travelling freely. As soon as you operate a vehicle on the highway, you need a licence and tax. This is the bit that is a privilege. Operating a vehicle is not a constitutional right.
“Larry, Curly and Moe El Bey!”
Skeptic, you just won today’s internet! Thanks for the humor and in-depth commentary.
Laws Office of Dewey, Cheatham, AND HOWE
Better than Manny, Moe, and Jack certifying the difference between car and a motor vehicle.
"The right to travel" does not imply the right to use any means you want.
Weird how they always think that "the right to travel" lets them drive without a license, but never try to get on a plane without a ticket.
🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯
😂😂
Not a good analogy as he is not entering his plane, the plane is owned and operated by someone else and they are charging him to enter their property.
Or fly one.
Seeing air travel requires ID, how do these fools even get on a plane?
"Here by special appearance" LOLOL 😂😂😂
"Life, liberty, and the pursuit of stupidity " LOLOL 😂
It really doesn't matter where you're from. You break the law and get caught, even if your from another country, you go to court and face the consequences.
In that man’s car, does he put the lever in T for travelling or D for DRIVE.
Why not put it into 1-2-3-4 or R? Driving doesn't depend upon having an automatic transmission.
Don’t confuse the poor child anymore than he already is.😂
Poor guy, he has a hard time presenting his beliefs when he can't even read the script.
Well, he should have spent more time in school learning how to speak, read, articulate, and critically think.
@@barbott5941 something I’ve noticed as a trend among people that subscribe to these kinds of nonsensical belief systems is that they have a hard time discerning between facts and what is essentially their own opinion. Case in point, I once had one of these individual say the following is a fact: “If the pilot had smoked a cigarette before flying, he would’ve been calmer and not crashed.” I had to explain to him that that’s an opinion.
Yeah, he’s worse than moving his lips while reading to himself; he’s got to sound it out.
@@barbott5941 That's the big problem. Getting everyone educated. But some people resist it, then attempt to become thinking adults. So sad and frustrating.
@@dragoncubes1074I think (opinion) that this has nothing to do with lack of education. It is willfully choosing to ignore what he or she learned while in school because some Internet Guru has convinced them that everything they learned is wrong and the Guru is the only source of knowledge. An actual lack of education just makes it so much easier for Gurus to convince them that the Guru is the only source of knowledge.
Special visitation??? What are you, an archangel? A spirit from the beyond?
I love this guy's face when the Judge and Prosecutor push back -- he makes a face like he just assembled an electronic device, and no matter what he does, the power won't come on.
I don't understand why this "right to travel" is so difficult for them to counter? Police and judges struggle with this all the time. My answer to them is they absolutely do have a right to travel, but if they want to operate a motor vehicle in order to travel, then the need a license, registration, and insurance on this mechanical instrument of travel. If they want to travel by foot, roller skates, pogo stick, or bus/train/airplane they can do it all they want. None of those decisions have anything to do with motor vehicles.
And furthermore, what the "right to travel" is really referring to is the right to freely move between different states. Basically saying that states cannot set up a border and require a specific permit to enter their state like you might when travelling in between countries. It was put in place to prevent states from becoming too much like individual countries.
Operate a motor vehicle *on the public roads.
Yes, this judge (while correct) did a poor job of explaining that at his level - but to be fair to her, she probably hasn't seen as much of SovCits as we have so didn't understand how fundamental their miscomprehension is.
Trying to argue with them is a waste of time.
They're gonna say stupid shit like "I'm not driving", "this is not a vehicle", and so on.
There are three simple steps on how law enforcement should deal with these morons"
Step 1 - Ask.
Step 2 - Order.
Step 3 - Make.
These idiots don't understand the concept of rights having RESTRICTIONS. In their tiny brains, if it's a "right", that MUST mean it's UNCONDITIONAL and ABSOLUTE. Therefore, he's dumb enough to think the "right to travel" means he can go ANYWHERE by ANY MEANS and not face consequences. I'm sure he thinks his 9-year-old daughter could fly an F16 through a crowded mall and that would be legal.
I wish the Judge would have been a bit more direct. "You have the right to travel your happy ass but you don't have the right to do it while operating a two-ton death machine with no valid license and insurance for when you inevitably run into someone".....and the Supreme Court has never said anything to the contrary.
She was unbelievably patient with him. Even gave him some law education, although it looks like nothing got processed in his brain.
I love Mr. Saroki in the upper right corner, paying no attention whatsoever and carrying on an animated conversation. LOL 🤣🤣
not to mention his laughter at what was going on.
This man is a danger to other drivers
Other travelers, you mean. 🤪
This guy is a danger to the gene pool.
Prosecutor Mason looks like she can't wait to take this guy apart piece by piece in front of a Jury.
You know it.
She ?
@@marioncrane09did you not notice her 1st name, the necklace and earrings, and cardigan sweater?
Sure would have loved to see the trial if it even happened - but not normally! 😣
With what has been going on with the left and woke movement’s?
Even "Black's Law Pictionary" defines "Statutes" as "Laws"
Even ANY dictionary also defines statutes as laws. Common sense is not common among sovcits.
@@UpnorthHere True but SovCits Bible is "Black's Law Dictionary, 2nd edition" © 1910... Likely because it's out of copyright and is free online.
They need to hang a sign at the entrance "Right to travel is NOT the right to operate motor vehicles.".
Capital L-lowercase o-lowercase s-lowercase e-lowercase r…for the record
GOOD ONE!
😂
Ha! Brilliant!
You can walk or ride the bus anywhere in the US. That's traveling... but if you want to drive, you need a license.
You can even drive without a license, but only on private land. Happens regularly on larger farms.
License is needed for operating motor vehicle on public roads just as a public safety issue.
True...And anyone who believes the right to travel is absolute and can't be regulated by law should try riding a bicycle on a freeway.
Well, I have seen videos where sovcits refuse to pay tolls because that impedes their right to travel.
They just want everyone else to pay for the transportation infrastructure which included public transportation. There seem to be people out in the world who work full time finding situations where a person is expected to do anything, like learning to do something, like operating a motor vehicle, then taking a test do demonstrate you know the rules that apply to operating a motor vehicle and can safely operate something that can easily be converted into a deadly weapon.
For those people who don’t want or need to operate a motor.vehicle, like people in Manhattan who often do not even own or lease a motor vehicle for their personal transportation, the Gurus work to find ways to make their constituents feel like they can do anything with absolutely no cost or obligation to themselves. Some people simply never mature from their teens where they are expected to challenge authority of any kind as a phase in becoming an adult. That phase should teach people who does and doesn’t have authority over them and how they recognize that authority.
Police have the authority, and the duty, to enforce the laws equally. No one can opt out of being subject to whatever laws they don’t think should apply to them.
These long-winded, passive judges drive me more crazy than these people.
"Murdock v. Pennsylvania was a 1943 Supreme Court case that ruled that a state cannot tax people who sell religious merchandise." - and just as @TeamSkeptic says has absolutely nothing to do with driving.
It's pretty simple, you can be traveling in a car as a passenger but as soon as you start driving you are operating a motor vehicle.
Travel by foot, bicycle, horse, and other non-motorized methods requires no driver’s license. The privilege to drive a motor vehicle on public roadways is regulated by individual states.
The mother of all cases on the topic of motor vehicles is Hendrick v. Maryland, circa 1915. Hendrick way back then claimed he did not need an operator license nor the need to register the vehicle. He lost. SCOTUS: “In the absence of national legislation covering the subject, a state may rightfully prescribe uniform regulations necessary for public safety.” “A state may require registration of motor vehicles, and a reasonable license fee…”
One thing I've always thought that should be pointed out to them is that they can travel in a car/motor vehicle/automobile, so long as they're either in the back, or riding shotgun, and not in direct control.
Whoa whoa whoa, ‘motor vehicle’? Now you’re talking commerce!
Haha just kidding. That’s the weakest of all arguments on their part. Can you imagine the first bozo that thought he found a connection between the UC commercial code and the use of motor vehicles on that statement? They must have felt like the second coming of christ or something!
@@kyleanderson2949 My favorite part is that they will just switch synonyms -- "It's not a car it's a motor vehicle!" "It's not a motor vehicle it's an automobile!" "It's not an automobile it's a car!"
That case he's citing has nothing to do with driver's licensing. And the Declaration of Independence doesn't grant any rights. It simply affirms the intention of the colonies to separate from England. Period.
Leave him alone. He’s on a roll. 🤣
I sometimes see bubbas wearing shirts that say something like "I have 1776 reasons to own a gun," and it's very hard to not school them on The Constitution. And I support responsible gun ownership.
At least he didn't cite the Magna Carta.
@@CD_Character Sovcits in the UK call themselves "lawfull rebellion" after a clause in the draft version of the Magna Carta that didn't make it into the final version.
I've seen sovcits in the UK quote the (American!) Constitution AND UIC codes in a traffic stop!
Defendant: what are they testifying about?
OMG!!!!
How in the world can a judge take these idiots seriously?
I love so much how he held up a printed wikipedia page as if that means anything, not to mention his complete lack of understanding of the English language.
what??? Wikipedia's not a revered law journal? 🙂
Yes we are free to travel without license and fees BUT using a one ton motorized potential killing machine i.e a vehicle IS a privilege.
He can travel freely in a vehicle, as long as he isn't the one operating it.
@@scott9904 Heck, if he's on his own privately owned land, he's also good.
Not when that vehicle is my land-yacht!
Owning a vehicle is so ingrained in American culture that some genuinly believe it's a God given right ..
@@Kaldurahm1but his arguement is that he is travelling from point A to point B across the country not doing doughnuts on his own land 👍
If he's so hot to travel, I suggest he buys a good pair of hiking boots and a bus ticket. 🤷♀️
I've always wondered how many of these Sovereign citizen are receiving state and local government assistance from the state they don't believe in. I think as soon as the pull the Sovereign citizen card they should have there assistance pulled.
I love when these high school drop outs try to sound like lawyers and use words they don't understand. Its sadly hilarious!!
Apparently this guy is a self-taught law expert. Too bad he had a fool for a teacher.
Probably learned from Chilli DeConstipated.
@@markwarren7116 Ah, but I bet the reason Mr Slouchy Mumbles here didn't land any killer blows with his motions is because he hasn't invested in one of Chilli's famous trifolds. If he'd been able to rely on the constitutional wisdom as set out in those, he wouldn't needed to rely on weak sauce Wikipedia printouts.
Honors graduate of RUclips University Law School.
There is a well known saying that an a man that represents himself in legal proceedings has a fool for a client.
A person representing themselves has a fool for an attorney and an idiot for a client.
This is like arguing why broccoli is good for you with a toddler.
You'd have better luck with the toddler and broccoli than with this fool.
Omg. Pay the $40. And get your license renewed and quit embarassing yourselves!!!
They need to stop these people from wasting the courts’ . It’s ridiculous!
"...here by special appearance..."
It's like he's a star and the judge is lucky to see his performance.
Burgess Meredith and Cesar Romero were special appearances on Batman too. Without them, it wouldn't have been a show. And guess what, you're a Joker!
Refer him to the 10th Amendment
In some states making a special appearance allows them to challenge jurisdiction later. He wouldn't stand a chance with that either.
The self delusion from this dummy no hoper is off the scale.🤦
He's a legend in his own mind.
11:00 The actual audacity of this clown to say that the court is ignoring facts of the case cited. When this guy is pulling, random nonsense from everywhere in the world, without reading a lick of it.
If they put this much effort in bettering themselves and their communities. So much energy given to defending wrong doing instead of taking accountability.
He says: "Here by special visitation.".......ME: "From which planet are you visiting us, sir?"
It simple. The moment you choose to use the roads, you accept the rules and regulations of said roads. Judges have a LOT of patience
Earrings gotta go, though.
Even if you granted them the word they like to abuse: “Commerce”, all that means is use of tax-paid roads, so it still makes sense.
They’re confused about public vs private land/roads. Cops don’t patrol farmland and you don’t need a driver’s license or have to put on a seat belt on a tractor. 🚜
And yeah, props to earring-wearin’ judge, no doubt
Love your content. My son is former law enforcement in the Metro Atlanta area. He said he never played around with the sovereign citizen crap. Didn't listen to it. Made the arrest and took them to jail. He told me he had no time for bullshit.
And he too follows your channel.
That’s how all sovcits should be handled.
So his argument is “I’m special and you can’t stop me” lol 😂
Maybe I'm old Skeptic but here's a couple things I remember and miss... people with a strong work ethic, citizens who recognize the social contract, people who are grateful for the freedom our democracy guarantees, and people who respect the full body of Law and the framework of government enshrined in the Constitution 🇺🇸⚖️. I appreciate you and your work and the fact that you actually know the law. I also appreciate your blunt sense of humor ❤️
I love how he is so unprepared for the case that he gets lost while repeating the sovcit script ...
We know the sov cit, mormish citizen nonsense and the free man of the nation script better than they do. It is actually hilarious that most of us know that. A sucker is born every minute and I truly believe it.
"I got laws stating all this is frivolous". This might be one of my favorite sov cit quotes of all time.
😂
"I GOT LAW BOOKS!"
-Lucky Laptop News
How about making a special disappearance?
@@stephenmarcus7051 Basically the argument is "I will not be held accountable for ANY of my actions". That is why they won't even take a free lawyer.. The lawyer will have a plea deal or they may have to admit to something..even if it is in their best interests. It is fascinating to watch the total self absorbed insanity.
@@danielrn133 I'm sure the potential lawyers are happy with that. I have watched some Sovshites' cases where they did have public defenders were assigned to them; when their clients started talking, you could have put their faces in the dictionary next to 'Despair.'
Neither he, nor any sovcit, is ever present in court "by special visitation."
I bet he was a “no-show” because he doesn’t agree. Case over 😂. We’ll see him when he gets brought in on a warrant.
Nope, she didn't prove jurisdiction, so he doesn't HAVE to show up. right? Right? Hey, don't touch me..
This doubles for a PSA to remind people not to get absolutely roasted before you have to do something important. What a doofus.
Even on his best sober day I doubt you'd get a better performance.
He should have at least practiced his script 😂😂😂😂👏
I think it’s a PSA for birth control.
Lol! You think this guy is high? No, Mister. This guy simply has the lQ of a potato!
This isn’t drugs, Mister. Timothy Williams merely has the lQ of a pumpkin.
Does this guy have a high school diploma? If he does we may need to see if his teachers were also idiots?
Not a real one, but I bet his buddies who fed him this sov-sh*t gave him one drawn up in crayon 🖍️
They always think that they are so smart that they have discovered something new!
ENOUGH! The judge spent wayyyy too much time on this fool!
"Judge you are ignoring the facts of the case." This chap is priceless.
Why is the judge even discussing with him? What a waste of time.
Seriously … is it because he’s a brother and she’s cutting him slack?
@@ScottW-vz4bf I doubt it. There was nothing in what she said that even hinted to cutting slack. She was shooting down every argument he had
She's trying to educate him with examples and direct evidence. A normal person would get the point. Unfortunately a normal person wouldn't make these arguments. It's a catch 22 of ignorance.
The judge is trying to help him and she is very kind.
The defendant is jumping through larger hoops than the ones on the judge’s ears.
Why don't any of the judges ask these people if that means anybody with no license can just fly an aircraft to "travel" to demonstrate how ridiculous it is?
They have. I’ve seen it. They call anything they don’t like hearing, “irrelevant”
To be fair, federal laws and regulations do, in fact, pre-empt state laws on flying, but not state regulations on driving. So, all you've done is open another can of worms for an argument that shouldn't have any legs.
You are on point with that one
Because they won't see it as a ridiculous argument at all. They'll just say, "of course you don't need a license for that, you're still traveling". And tbf, by their flawed logic, it would make sense...
Plus their line of argumentation is a perfect defense of theft. Since they're just traveling and taking that vehicle away from them restricts their ability to travel, so they should also be able to just fly a plane, since they're "just traveling."
Since you know, to them there's no difference between the freedom to travel and the method they do it.
"I'm not 'driving a car' I'm just traveling. I'm not 'stealing a car' I'm just traveling."
Never mind that they can *walk* wherever they want asa means of travel. if driving a car is a right that should be unrestricted, what does it matter what vehicle they use to do it? It's not registered because it's not street safe? Who cares, you can't expect them to register their vehicle, that's whatever irrelvant case law they want to cite that says that the government can't put restrictions ion their travel.
Although I am considered kind and an empath, this man is permanently stuck on stupid😂😂😂
I firmly think that to be a sov cit, you have to cut off your personal empathy. It's the only way I could think one could hold a belief that you're so important that you know secret law things no one else - including every Judge and Attorney you meet - don't know.
the judge pretending to have a note pad and "writing down" notes about the man's nonsense arguments... 🤣
Those states that are saying women can't go out of state for an abortion are violating the right to travel.
"Sovereign Dipshitizen" might be my new favorite phrase. Well done sir.
A jury trial! What a complete and total waste of time and resources.
Arguing with a Sov Cit is like arguing with a coconut!
Imagine telling a judge that they're missing the details of a case 😆
Proof that a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.
In his case, *very* little knowledge.
Somewhat ironically, the _actual_ quote is _"A little _*_learning_*_ is a dangerous thing..."_ ;)
Why is the judge wasting so much time with this moron?
Literally called the Dunning-Krüger Effect. It’s very interesting.
Look it up, it’s a good explanation for the level of overconfidence in beliefs like these!
He's so very, very, super-special. And so highly impressed with himself. He's above all the paltry, mundane so-called laws of this world, which disgust him to no end and do not apply to him.
Facts: You are allowed to travel freely between States, provided you are not restricted by Warrant, Parole, or Probation. That refers to on foot, or horseback. When cars came along, they gave States rights to protect the Public. States may, and do require an Operator’s license, License Plate,, and insurance. You can still travel freely. Start your feet!
Yes, "Reading is Fundamental". . . and so is "comprehension".
There is a difference between comprehension and WANTING to comprehend... These people fully comprehend... They just don't want to
OMG he’s reading this stuff from Wikipedia??? I’m in art school and we aren’t allowed to use Wikipedia as a sole source because it’s publicly edited! We have to refer to books, publications, journals, research papers and articles!
He’s reading something he simply cannot understand 🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️
The Wikipedia articles state the primary issue of the the case. He must be reading from the text of the decision, just not the important part; you know, the part that addresses what the case is actually about.
Right lol
He seems to not have the most basic education to even be able to reason or form a coherent thought.
I read the wikipedia article and I understand it just fine. This man is too smooth brained to have any grasp of the words he was reading. You need at LEAST a 6th grade vocabulary to understand the case. I can tell you exactly what all these cases are about and what was decided, with perhaps a 3%-4% amount of inaccuracy. That's what wikipedia does, it gives one enough knowledge to be common, not a specialist. This man? Mentally restarded.
It was pretty funny to see him stammering over his notes! Print out crap from the internet, don’t read it, go to court as an ignoramus.
Probably thought he was the brightest bulb in the room
This man just held up a copy of a Wikipedia page to a judge. My teachers back in junior high wouldn't even except that as a valid source when doing school work.
He can barely stumble his way through this "defense." I wonder how it will turn out?
He definitely has reading and comprehension difficulties. Add his delusions about the law and himself and that's one disastrous mix. 💣
I feel so sorry for the judges, lawyers, and police who are exposed to these loopy nitwits all the time. They usually show a lot of patience.
They literally fight so hard to not pay bills, responsibilities, their kids, or anything. The same ones who will fight everyone that they're so great and high values. Can't tell them anything
Can't believe he didn't read his own notes before coming to court. These people are such a waste of space.
Too funny "Life liberty and the pursuit of happiness" and he adds "right to travel". This judge is too patient with him.
I feel so bad for these state defense attorneys who are underpaid and begging to help this man for free. To keep him from digging his grave deeper.
I'm pretty sure that binge watching a season of "Suits" would make me more qualified to represent myself in court than any SovCit.
Watch a few years of Law and Order and you'd have a lot more on the ball than this kid.
"Larry, 😆Curly, 😄 and Moe, 😃 .... El Bey." 😅🤣😂. Perfect! 🤣😅😆
When the judge says she is writing down she is doing her groceries😂😂😂🦄🏴🦄🏴