Knowles is a gem. Love your pfp and name. I went as President Covfefe this las Halloween. People at the bar loved it, they even had a greater laugh when I took off the mask and they saw I was black. Trump2024!
Let’s finally break this down. Which side is smart and which side is ignorant? Let’s use hypocrisy as the litmus test. Which side are the biggest hypocrites when it comes to talk and actions? Actions with results vs, just talk.
@regulator619 debunked is a bit rough on that sound bite. He mentioned multiple programs that bush used to grow government. But calling bush liberal is a bit silly. I've actually never heard that 'talking point' before.
I love how the first ten minutes were essentially on how both parties can agree on some things, and let's just all get along... and then Micheal comes in and just shreds it to bits. 😂
Great moment wasnt it? I sat here thinking they asked the wrong guy to this forum and he makes no apologies either. Thing is, he was right. I also agree wholeheartedly with his take on having choices. When I think of freedom, I think of the ability to choose for myself. Life is all about choices down to the brand of toothpaste we use. The thing about having choices tho is that we don’t all choose the same. That said, where can we all meet int middle while at the same time having respect for those who choose differently
@@kaywaits4616 that is why core values matter. We can't meet where values contradict. The American Civil War is proof of that. So, it's nice to talk about meetings but there never can be around some issues. This is especially so when political systems, with forced participation and taxation require participation by those who decent. If a start point were to begin, it must be by removing all participatory compulsion. People must be able to opt out or, in. Or, their taxes should never be used for contentious purposes at all. In this context, if some is free to choose evil, they are also free to live and die by the consequences of those choices.
@@gweilospur5877 Credentials for what? He’s a political commentator, he’s an observer and holds his own opinions. Nobody is qualified because of degrees, we have doctors out here that believe boys are girls and they have degrees. A degree doesn’t mean anything in 2023.
@@gweilospur5877 Oh, now you’re questioning if I have a degree. I see. Rest assured, I do and it doesn’t separate me from people without them. As a degree holder, you’d know that credentials aren’t needed to make basic observations. Common sense apparently isn’t that common.
@@gweilospur5877 You’re a slave to western education systems, stop thinking you’re more credible because of a degree. That isn’t the case. We currently have tens of thousands of people that can’t find jobs with degrees while illegal aliens get hired every day with no education background.
I had to laugh when the CNN man said he wanted someone who represents him to have 15 minutes in the Oval Office. I'm sorry, perhaps I'm mistaken, but didn't you have EIGHT YEARS?!?
I'm an artist & I was rather left on cultural & social issues because freedom of speech & expression was always very important to me. But the left does not support it anymore. They also do not support critisizing religion anymore. Except when it comes to Christianity. It has all shifted & it's been turned upside down.
@@jonmiller1430 I think it makes perfect sense to have for profit prisons, because libertarianism and the free market, but I am against the drug war, I definitely agree we’ve dumped way to much into it.
@@bdawgrise6961 Thing is with for profit prisons and jails, they often treat their inmates like inhuman trash and feed them starvation food. I know because I once missed a court date and found out first hand. Doesn't matter what you're in for, the policy is to regard you as cattle. Free markets work best in the free market. Jail is a human money farm, the more private prisons, the greater incentive to arrest people for anything under the sun. Oh and I was arrested for a DUI for weed that I smoked the day before..
I'm not a conservative but I find myself siding with Knowles in these panels. Because he's honest while the leftist, especially the guy second from the left, use really dishonest tactics. He was spot on when he called them out for bringing up a topic as a talking point attack on the right, and immediately trying to shut it down when he counters. My left wing relatives do that all the time.
Nah. Charlie Kirk is too confrontational in his style. You first want to disarm your opponent. Then get more aggressive as the exchange continues. The fool was the guy second from the left. He denied he said "Kanye is what happens when negroes don't read." Then 2 minutes later admitted that he said it.
There was one liberal who specialized in being racist, and one liberal who didn't read much (not in that order)...and four other people who just wanted a real conversation.
The liberal guy with the yellow socks is a little, virtue signaling, "I'm a victim", racist who thinks that if a black person disagrees with him they are illiterate....hypocritical racism right there
@@unitedstatesofamerica9948 Because it's the most obvious descriptor. I watched the whole thing and still have no idea who that dude is. If you prefer his ideology, I would describe his ideology as race hustler based on the things he is animated by and that's a bombastic term I wouldn't want to use either.
The debates do that to you. It's one thing to listen to people agreeing with each other with no counter points, it's another to hear counter points that make you question your understanding. I find the right are a lot more open minded and question ideas rather then what i find the left doing which is alleging a nefarious motive behind an idea and then insulting the speaker.
@@7EiamJ7 I say something. They tell me that what I said was problematic, then proceed to tell me I said something I never said. I clarify what I said. But why would they listen to me when it comes to what I say? According to how they behave, they know my intentions and connotations and hidden implications much better than I do... It's so incredibly frustrating for me.
The CNN guy is a man-child and becomes visibly uncomfortable when confronted directly or indirectly. Also when he speaks he keeps gazing at the crowd as if to see if they approve. When the others speak they look at each other.
@D C I don't think so, they were talking about marijuana right? Ending marijuana prohibition on the Federal level wouldn't give the states any authority they don't already have. States can already make their own marijuana laws, which most of them do.
@D C I remember what he said now. I think he's wrong about that too. I'm sure he likes the electoral college, being from South Carolina, because it gives that state more influence in elections. But for the country as a whole, it's stupid. So what if candidates campaign more in big cities, that's where more people are. The president is supposed to represent people, not landmass. You still couldn't win with literally just CA and NY
Michael is soo o correct. Until we all are against "snuffing out life in the womb" we cannot mesh with those who are for abortion.. Capital punishment is for those have committed a capital crime by choice. The unborn are innocent and their only voice is ours. 🙏❤✝️✡🇺🇸🇮🇱🎺📢
That bakari guy was a joke. His body expression throughout this whole panel showed how uninterested he was in debating and at 37:16 he had the gall to be texting on his phone
@@Maxq1 No, its pure arrogance, he thinks he is the cool guy who is right, and the others , well their opinion doesn't matter. He showed that arrogance when that kid asked him a question as well.
@@AWlpsSHOW36 Fantastic comment! Factually exuberant and intriguinly statistical! Awe defying and eye capturing! So great in fact, that I want you to take your sorry bum back into primary school where you belong.
@@isaacchen1893 WTF mate? I didn't ask for your little comment. I didn't comment to be factual. You're just pissed off that there are people like me who don't like Michael Knowles and don't appreciate his behaviour. He's smug and a dick and I can sense that he loves the conflict which is messed up. Why don't you grow the hell up and quit worshipping him like he's this 'truthful factual' person.
@@AWlpsSHOW36 I'm not a leftist but I agree with you on Michael Knowles. Knowles's views are massively out of touch with the American people, for example he criticized Trump for firing neocon warmonger John Bolton, criticized Trump for the First Step Act, one of the best things Trump did and he praised Biden for the 1994 crime bill.
@@abrahamlincoln937 It's really a breath of fresh air to meet a person like you! I seriously don't understand how anyone can like and appreciate this asshole. He's mostly just picking sides because he finds it amusing and sees politics as a game. He smiles and giggles when people clash and argue. He loves the division and wants to keep the country divided. Like on here, he praises the death penalty and his love for it, then says he's pro-life. And then the only reason why he's against legalizing Marijuana is because "It's a new leftist thing that we don't need" He's basically just hates everything Left wing. He hates Liberals and instantly judges them before they get to ask him a question or say their opinion. He's a rude smug bully. And his freaking fanbase isn't any better. They are worse.
They really needed Candace Owens on this panel, if for no other reason, to even out the numbers/sides. It is really clear Michael Knowles, everything else aside, is the smartest person on that stage.
Michael Won When he smiled that first smirky smile about loving polarization. The lets all be friends changed real quick, as he triggered them, all while keeping that smile o on his face. ♡Knowles
@@legendarylitening By what, Kyle "simple refuted counter argument" Kulinski? Anyone who still thinks "pro-life" necessarily includes "anti-death penalty" understands neither.
@@audiorage82407 We're not retarded, we all understand pro-life refers to abortion. It's the fact that the phrase pro life is hypocritical in the cases of many conservatives like knowles because they don't believe in the sanctity of life in all scenarios like the death penalty. This is the argument.
TRT VITOR No it translates to “Slow the fuck down, i either don’t agree with your premise, You brought up a bullshit stat, Your straw-manning or your making too many points at once “
The girl was the most sensible one on the panel. Didn't interrupt, Articulated her points very well, and came from a reasonable point of view while also being pragmatic.
Except the truth of the matter is that when we win everyone wins . Even the people who are kicking and screaming . BTW .I'm talking about Reagan and Trump not the Bush presidents . They were Democrat light and Globalists .
If you’re talking American citizens, there was only one: Hamdi. He eventually won in court but the govt’s take home lesson was “just fuckin kill em with drones”. Obama expanded that to “even if they’re American citizens” and afaik Trump is continuing the tradition.
@G G people are terrorist sympathizers these days and will continue to be so until they're the ones in the position of some deep shit. Seems to be the mentality of folks nowadays to overlook that. Some people even approve of accepting ISIS brides back into the country or having a radical sympathizer as an American Politician. 6 people agreed with his scoffing, I'm not surprised.
Ffs, when will we stop caring about who won the debate and who had better one-liners and rather who is actually smarter and right about more things. It was clearly Kyle here. "We win you lose" is how America got to where it is today.
Knowles stands and defends those with conservative values. And much as I like Lauren Chen she should boldly declare her position and not bother with cordiality masking her intellectual jugglery. The issue of abortion-like all issues-has shades but it is also black and white. Take a firm stand Lauren. It's life or death of the defenseless unborn. Kudos on Michael Knowles. He has balls.
+E V-It sounds to me like you're saying everyone on death row are innocent. And how does capital punishment compare with a society's conscious act to kill a defenceless human being who has not committed any crime? The individual on death row go through a judicial process which involves judgement by his peers. It's not a perfect system but to make it accomodate your particular sense of fair play is ludicrous especially because it is a system that protects and deters.
Thomas Woo you stupid there are people every year on death row that are innocent and executed and murdered by the state. No shit not everyone is not a criminal there. Bad oh please until the system is reformed no life should have to be accused and tried by a system looking for more god damn victims
@@ev99193 nobody argues that improvement could not take place in the criminal justice system but the death penalty killing an innocent is very rare because of the thoroughness of our courts. An extremely rare scenario does not work to disprove a necessary punishment for some of the worlds most disgusting people.
Knowles is correct. There is no room for compromise when absolute principles are at stake. It's all or nothing. So, we have to ask which political movement has moved the most over the last 25 years? It is the left. The right has remained firm on principle.
Jack Radzelovage he was wrong and the hypocrisy was Hilarious. 😂😂 Didn’t knowles just get booted from Fox News? Hard thing to do considering they keep race baiter Tucker Carlson on air.
Jack Radzelovage I know that trumps economy is slowing down. I know we are increasing the deficit debt at at historic rate. I know Trump asked for help from Ukraine. Which is illegal. Want more dip shit?😂😂
I love how they literally have no real arguments, so they just go to "what-about-isms". Also, notice how respectful Charlie and Micheal are when the idiots are speaking, and then when it's their turn to listen, they literally yell over those 2 gentlemen, just because they are making a good point and they don't want people to hear it.
Partisanship is our downfall. Either party "wins," the people lose. Why is policy and government no longer about the people but about stupid wedge issues?
I love how Michael asked if he can finish and the black guy said no and tried to steamroll him but mike said ok fuck it ill keep going anyway and beat him when it cames to over talking
That guy has a major chip on his shoulder. He said he doesn't "Stand on the shoulders of Kanye." because Kanye doesn't read, but he "Stands on the shoulders of Treyvon Martin." He's a liar. He's pissed because Kanye rejects to victim narrative.
They dont want to hear Knowles drop a truth bomb on them. However, when that guy said "when dont read" we wanted them to hear how stupid it sounds to normal people.
I remember when I applied for college 12 years ago, I ticked asian. I was 2nd in my class, quite good SAT scores, captain of the bball team, vice president of the NHS and Student Council. And i didnt get into any colleges i applied for except 1. (I didnt apply for havard or those top school but definitely top 40 at the time) I assumed it was as they said, "2008 was very competitive year" etc etc... Knowing now that schools require a higher score for Asians than for my white and black classmates, I can't help but regret ticking that damn box. (But hey, maybe my essay sucked, idk)
@@doh-nc8ku I mean it wasn't actually a point it was more of an insult toward kayne west , not reading doesn't make you less smart , kayne prefers to learn through converstaion and videos . Also for a guy on the left (The CNN guy) , saying people who can't read have bad opinions is kinda offensive toward dyslexics lmao .
Everyone on that panel is a partisan you moron. You have democrats like that CNN guy and Kulinski and right wingers like Michael and Charlie and only person on that panel with actual consistent thought is roaming millennial
@Lightning4563 Being concise and specific on your positions is what you want in a politician and in politics period. Just as Knowles said in the panel I'd rather have people discussing politics and becoming politicians that genuinely know what they believe in and what their values are rather than people playing hot potato when they're pressed on an issue and just conceding a point rather than actually arguing based upon their own values.
Wow, leave it to Michael K. to hit the nail on the head as soon as he starts speaking. I completely agree, I love the polarization. It helps us conservatives to continue to beat down the left. #LeftistTears
@Jason Salazar Lol I‘m not a leftist but must be extremely in your right-wing bubble to really believe that Knowels was nailing it here. This guy is just insanely foolish and an utter partisan hack.
As a girl I got super uncomfortable when the cnn guy said “sorry for mansplaining.” Then of course he cut her off later when she was talking about Kanye 🤦♀️
Its not kyles fault that Michael knowles viewpoints are so hilariously contradictory and simplistic that one sentence refutes it lol. You cannot consider yourself pro life if you support a system that you know leads to The government murdering innocent citizens lives.
Matt it’s not intellectually dishonest. At least 4% of the Inmates put to death are innocents, if you’re okay with the government murdering innocent people just so you can kill actual criminals for your own sense of moral justice when locking them up for life would be cheaper then you just can’t objectively call yourself “prolife”, you’re killing innocents in order to kill more people. Think of it like this, you have 96 criminals you can have executed, but you can only kill them if you also kill 4 completely innocent lives as well. Would you kill those innocent people in order to get to The criminals ? Or would you lock them? (which would also be cheaper option as well.)
john oboczky But they DO KNOW that they are killing innocent people, that’s why the analogy works . they may not know exactly which ones are innocent , but they know for a fact that a percentage of them are innocent and execute them anyway. That’s the entire point. I’d argue that you’re being intellectually dishonest by pretending this an argument over whether there are more innocent fetuses or more innocent people on death row when this argument is about being consistent with your “pro life” view and not being a hypocrite. The fact that michael knowles knows that innocent people are put to death but still literally professes his love for that system only makes him just more of hypocritical intellectual lightweight. Loving a system that you know kills innocent lives Is extremely antithetical to the entire concept of being “pro life” , it’s not pro life, it’s anti abortion.
john oboczky it absolutely is hypocritical , sorry you don’t like the proper use of the word but it fits. You’re making a false equivalence between letting in immigrants and directly killing people especially when there are alternatives to killing that are even cheaper than the death penalty .
here it is 4 years later- and the world is SO MUCH WORSE than when this panel took place. - and all due to the kind of thinking of the 3 people on the left.
In theory it works, but the problems arise when the gridlock suddenly slips and some bad policy slips through. Then the gridlock resumes and then we're stuck with the bad policy because the gridlock prevents anyone from repealing the bad policy. It also relies on each branch of government staying inside their assigned boundaries, like the legislature shouldn't just throw up their hands and say "We can't get anything done, let the executive deal with it." Or the judicial has to realize that they should not be setting up laws without the legislature. And finally, the legislature, as you say, is designed to keep much of anything from getting done, so they shouldn't vote an executive department into existence and then get mad when the department doesn't do what they want.
@@Praehotec Yep, that's the blueprint for the glacial-pace subversion of America - so slow hardly anyone can detect it happening! Unfortunately the founders didn't make the Constitution bulletproof and it's only a matter of time. America is already so far from originalism it's scary. The fact that there is even a debt based central bank and a federal income tax collection agency should have been enough to spark national outrage and possibly even armed resistance, but no, American's are too docile to defend the founding documents that created their nation. Sad.
I hate the "if you are pro-life, how can you support the death penalty" argument. It is absolutely asinine as these are 2 completely separate issues. There is an immense difference between a gestating child in utero and a person convicted of committing a heinous crime. The death penalty is a punitive action which follows due process and the proper adjudication of a criminal trial. This is in no way comparable to the wanton execution of a developing child. Liberals and leftists make themselves look like complete idiots whenever they make this "gotcha" attempt.
+Dennis Bloodsworth Pregnancy defines the act of what? - The development of a child during gestation. Abortion defines the act of terminating or ending the development of a child during gestation. If abortion is not the execution of anything, then how do you explain the outcome of avoiding an abortive operation? What is an "unnecessary pregnancy"? And, on what basis do you determine that a pregnancy is "unnecessary"?
@@zion653 Pregnancy isn't necessarily an act. Its a process. Aborting the pregnancy isn't tantamount to murder. Why? Because there's tens of thousands of people who were once aborted. Guess what? They still exist. Are you going to sit there and tell me they were murdered? Would you really have me believe that? On what basis did I determine it was unnecessary? Easy. The woman in question does not want to take the pregnancy to term. She realizes that she is not at a stage in her life where motherhood is proper for her and she likely knows that the adoption centers are flooded with kids as is. It's also unnecessary because it's something sustainable. While successful reproduction is appropriate and necessary for the continuation of the human species, it's not necessary in every case for everyone.
@@zion653 And you are incorrect with that definition of abortion. The fetus will still develope if viable. The proper phrasing is it may or may not lead to the end of an unborn from developing.
Are you seriously contending that tens of thousands of people were aborted and, yet, still exist? How, exactly, do you come to that conclusion? An abortive procedure terminates a pregnancy and, therefore, terminates the gestation of a developing child - resulting in the death of a child. The only exception is in cases where the child survives the abortive procedure, which is rare; however, proponents of abortion actually support measures to allow the child to die should it survive the abortive operation, a measure which is exponentially heinous. A woman's desire to end the life of a child by terminating her pregnancy does not trump the child's right to life. You do not have the right to end the life of another individual simply upon the basis that you find that individual to be inconvenient to your life. If a woman considers that she is not at the proper moment in her life to begin motherhood, then there exists a plethora of preventive measures to avoid such a reality, including a myriad of contraceptives as well as abstinence. If you engage in a coital affair and become pregnant, you do not have the right to terminate the life of the resultant individual. Any individual who does this is using abortion as a failsafe form of contraception, an act which I find deplorable. Adoption centers being "flooded" with children does not justify reasonably as a rationale for ending the life of the children. Any individual who believes that reproduction in their case is not "appropriate and necessary" should take measures to ensure that reproduction does not occur. Being irresponsible in your behavior does not qualify as a rationale for the termination of a developing child.
![Ben Shapiro vs. Cenk Uygur [FULL DEBATE] | Politicon 2017](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8ko0DVJkLG0/mqdefault.jpg)
Knowles enjoying himself and smiling the entire time is just golden. He’s simply operating on a completely different level than anyone on the panel😂
It's easier to destroy than to build up
Anybody can smile, even an imbecile.
Knowles is a gem. Love your pfp and name. I went as President Covfefe this las Halloween. People at the bar loved it, they even had a greater laugh when I took off the mask and they saw I was black. Trump2024!
Let’s finally break this down. Which side is smart and which side is ignorant? Let’s use hypocrisy as the litmus test. Which side are the biggest hypocrites when it comes to talk and actions? Actions with results vs, just talk.
@@marksauck3399 Calling people hypocrites without any examples of their hypocrisy is worthless.
Democrats: "Let me finish my point"
Republicans: "Okay."
Republicans: "Let me finish my point"
Democrats: "No"
@regulator619 What were the debunked talking points?
@regulator619 debunked is a bit rough on that sound bite. He mentioned multiple programs that bush used to grow government. But calling bush liberal is a bit silly. I've actually never heard that 'talking point' before.
regulator619 The average person tells about 3 lies in a 10 minute conversation. But, Democrats never tell lies. Bahahaha... Ok, got it.
@G G exactly... pro oppression and pro abortion.
Warrantless spying... obama on trump campaign?
I love how the first ten minutes were essentially on how both parties can agree on some things, and let's just all get along... and then Micheal comes in and just shreds it to bits. 😂
Boom Thus saith the Lord Truth will be heard but the 3 on the left hate the truth given by Michael
It's great lol! I think he left need 2 parties to be honest.
He knows how to open up debate, that's for sure.
Great moment wasnt it? I sat here thinking they asked the wrong guy to this forum and he makes no apologies either. Thing is, he was right. I also agree wholeheartedly with his take on having choices. When I think of freedom, I think of the ability to choose for myself. Life is all about choices down to the brand of toothpaste we use. The thing about having choices tho is that we don’t all choose the same. That said, where can we all meet int middle while at the same time having respect for those who choose differently
@@kaywaits4616 that is why core values matter. We can't meet where values contradict. The American Civil War is proof of that.
So, it's nice to talk about meetings but there never can be around some issues. This is especially so when political systems, with forced participation and taxation require participation by those who decent.
If a start point were to begin, it must be by removing all participatory compulsion. People must be able to opt out or, in. Or, their taxes should never be used for contentious purposes at all.
In this context, if some is free to choose evil, they are also free to live and die by the consequences of those choices.
I love how Michael debates, he's so composed and takes no bs, and tells it how it is
And the response he gets is “Nuh uh, that’s bullshit. I’m black btw.”
@@gweilospur5877 You don’t have a degree, so we can trust your take on Knowles.
@@gweilospur5877 Credentials for what? He’s a political commentator, he’s an observer and holds his own opinions. Nobody is qualified because of degrees, we have doctors out here that believe boys are girls and they have degrees. A degree doesn’t mean anything in 2023.
@@gweilospur5877 Oh, now you’re questioning if I have a degree. I see. Rest assured, I do and it doesn’t separate me from people without them.
As a degree holder, you’d know that credentials aren’t needed to make basic observations. Common sense apparently isn’t that common.
@@gweilospur5877 You’re a slave to western education systems, stop thinking you’re more credible because of a degree. That isn’t the case. We currently have tens of thousands of people that can’t find jobs with degrees while illegal aliens get hired every day with no education background.
Michael and Charlie were clearly the superior intellects on the panel
Yup... and the Young Turk and the hypocritical CNN clown were the most inferior intellects.
The others are just brainwashed by their establishment repeating propaganda.
The young turks guy was just loud
Lauren Chen is cool as well.
I had to laugh when the CNN man said he wanted someone who represents him to have 15 minutes in the Oval Office. I'm sorry, perhaps I'm mistaken, but didn't you have EIGHT YEARS?!?
BOOM!
Nope, Obama was too moderate for the left.
J B Obama wasn’t black enough?
He likes listening to himself speak, doesn't he? He doesn't like you, you get talked over.
What a jerk.
get fricked libcucks
Everytime the Left starts losing a debate, they start throwing insults and get condescending.
I always enjoy watching Knowles be the most based one in the room
I was an independent, but the last two years has pushed me right to the Republican Party, I will never vote Democrat again.
I'm an artist & I was rather left on cultural & social issues because freedom of speech & expression was always very important to me. But the left does not support it anymore.
They also do not support critisizing religion anymore. Except when it comes to Christianity.
It has all shifted & it's been turned upside down.
Then vote for Bernie Sanders
Same. From not giving a fuck to realizing what's actually going on once I left home and enlisted in the Air Force.
@@whitexchina You sound like Dave Rubin. “Yeah ideas” 😂
@@highlightrelz897 I don't know what you mean by that.
Does anyone else love Michael Knowles as much as I do?
Tbh he kinda sucks
I love him soooooo much
I wish he would be for the ending of the drug war, and ending for profit prisons. Other than that I agree with him on most issues.
@@jonmiller1430 I think it makes perfect sense to have for profit prisons, because libertarianism and the free market, but I am against the drug war, I definitely agree we’ve dumped way to much into it.
@@bdawgrise6961 Thing is with for profit prisons and jails, they often treat their inmates like inhuman trash and feed them starvation food. I know because I once missed a court date and found out first hand. Doesn't matter what you're in for, the policy is to regard you as cattle. Free markets work best in the free market. Jail is a human money farm, the more private prisons, the greater incentive to arrest people for anything under the sun. Oh and I was arrested for a DUI for weed that I smoked the day before..
The dems try to talk over Michael and Charlie constantly, I don't think they're listening to anything they have to say at all.
Are you handicapped they all were doing it
@jon jones to be fair, Kyle isn’t really even a Democrat
Liberals seldom listen. They only talk over you louder
@@southbayjay2540true kyle is a sell out.
@@alexaustin5664You mean Mr Ballz?
I like how he was like I didn't say black, what I said was negro....... How the fuck is that better?
That black guy made no sense.
He made a little sense as a stereotypical modern racist, but the guy next to him made even less sense.
Glad to know I'm not alone because I thought the same thing
Now early 2020 and Andrew Gillum found in Florida hotel with meth and a gay escort.
@@eatsomeseaweed3693 Had to google this to believe it. Couldn't make that up if you wanted to.
@B I G B R U H serious about what? Not knowing this story?
Wow, I admire Michael's frank honesty.
I'm not a conservative but I find myself siding with Knowles in these panels. Because he's honest while the leftist, especially the guy second from the left, use really dishonest tactics. He was spot on when he called them out for bringing up a topic as a talking point attack on the right, and immediately trying to shut it down when he counters.
My left wing relatives do that all the time.
He's coming to my school to speak next month. Looking forward to that
Lol Michael knowles is the biggest idiot on stage he got rekted by both Kyle and Charlie lmaooooo
@@Analbarf he definitely has far more knowledge on the issues and more education than either.
Nah.
Charlie Kirk is too confrontational in his style.
You first want to disarm your opponent. Then get more aggressive as the exchange continues.
The fool was the guy second from the left. He denied he said "Kanye is what happens when negroes don't read." Then 2 minutes later admitted that he said it.
"Can we let the man rest in peace?!" Said by the same man who 3 times already brought up the names of several dead people to stand on top of..
BRO CHARLIE CRUSHED THAT BLACK MAN WITH THE KANYE COMMENT
"Represent people who look like me!" And there, right there, is the racism.
There was one liberal who specialized in being racist, and one liberal who didn't read much (not in that order)...and four other people who just wanted a real conversation.
Edison Carter,esq now in early 2020, Andrew Gillum found in FL hotel with meth and a gay escort.
That guy pissed me off so much. What a goon
The liberal guy with the yellow socks is a little, virtue signaling, "I'm a victim", racist who thinks that if a black person disagrees with him they are illiterate....hypocritical racism right there
@floss floss such a load of crap you've been feed.
I love how Michael Knowles gives a verbal middle finger to far-left politics every time he opens his mouth
Kenny Dillinger what the fuck? Knowles was such a fool here??
Joey Barrios okay buddy🤣
Knowles was even worse than the CNN guy. And I didn't think that was possible.
Knowles is for due process only for American citizens in America. I guess he will never travel to another country.
@@cineastik8220 Just came back from France or Italy I believe.
Black dude was on his phone almost the entire last half of this. Disgusting.
Omf. I wasn't watching, just listening. Why. Just why tho. I skipped back through to see. No wonder he was so damn quiet.
Why is his skin color relevant? So much for not being about race, referring to him by his skin color instead of his ideology.
Had to look up marching orders
He got on his phone bc he was uncomfortable with the facts and couldn't make an argument for the left. It was a fake on the phone.
@@unitedstatesofamerica9948 Because it's the most obvious descriptor. I watched the whole thing and still have no idea who that dude is. If you prefer his ideology, I would describe his ideology as race hustler based on the things he is animated by and that's a bombastic term I wouldn't want to use either.
The moment we all fell in love with Knowles
I would just like to say, this moderator is tremendously better than Clay Aiken
Could anyone actually say Aiken was a legitimate moderator? The live audience was laughing at him... The RUclips audience was laughing harder. 😂
@@NickLitten the only person not laughing at clay aiken was himself
Connor Flinn the one he moderated between knowles and baldy was awful
Clay aiken is the best
Hes the most bias moderator
Thank God its not him ^^
Why don't we base everything on merit and not skin color?
HBY because victim card is way too valuable
Yeah it's in their playbook, they can't do anything without it
Not when the race card will save them from basically everything, lol, so nah they not gonna give that up, too valuable for them
What do you mean? That would ruin all their plans. It's all about devide and conquer to keep power.
Ask Republicans.
I’m becoming more right from listening to these real conversations.
The debates do that to you. It's one thing to listen to people agreeing with each other with no counter points, it's another to hear counter points that make you question your understanding. I find the right are a lot more open minded and question ideas rather then what i find the left doing which is alleging a nefarious motive behind an idea and then insulting the speaker.
@@7EiamJ7 I say something.
They tell me that what I said was problematic, then proceed to tell me I said something I never said.
I clarify what I said.
But why would they listen to me when it comes to what I say? According to how they behave, they know my intentions and connotations and hidden implications much better than I do...
It's so incredibly frustrating for me.
The CNN guy is a man-child and becomes visibly uncomfortable when confronted directly or indirectly. Also when he speaks he keeps gazing at the crowd as if to see if they approve. When the others speak they look at each other.
He's just another race baiter.
It could just be habit. When you're on CNN at a table of 5 people, you still look at the camera when you speak
yeah .…………...people next to him are talking and he's the only one on stage staring straight at the audience
@D C I don't think so, they were talking about marijuana right? Ending marijuana prohibition on the Federal level wouldn't give the states any authority they don't already have. States can already make their own marijuana laws, which most of them do.
@D C I remember what he said now. I think he's wrong about that too. I'm sure he likes the electoral college, being from South Carolina, because it gives that state more influence in elections. But for the country as a whole, it's stupid. So what if candidates campaign more in big cities, that's where more people are. The president is supposed to represent people, not landmass. You still couldn't win with literally just CA and NY
The guy 2nd from the left changes the subject whenever he gets called out. Lol!
I hate him so damn much
This black guy thinks he's being so deep but he's so shallow
Well said
Kiddie pool deep
So much for not being about race, referring to him by his skin color instead of his ideology.
@@unitedstatesofamerica9948 what’s his ideology? Liberal? That could refer to like 3 different people on stage.
@@unitedstatesofamerica9948 Because that person is the one brought out his race all the time.
Michael is soo o correct. Until we all are against "snuffing out life in the womb" we cannot mesh with those who are for abortion.. Capital punishment is for those have committed a capital crime by choice. The unborn are innocent and their only voice is ours. 🙏❤✝️✡🇺🇸🇮🇱🎺📢
“Can we let the man Rest In Peace” but minutes before he was invoking several dead people and “standing on their shoulders”. Lmao.
He only stands on the shoulders of people who are voiceless and stackable, for his own purposes.
The guy is plastic
Hitlers dead to doesn’t mean we should stop criticizing him.
There’s a term for this, oh yes, liberal, synonym:hypocrite
Lmfao YES
Knowles is easily the sharpest on the panel.
Austin Madore I’m not. He has to run for prez. He could wipe the floor with anything the dems throw at him.
Close second roaming millenial? She at least tries to be productive
Knowles is on a whole nother level here
Knowles is a fool 😂
But Knowles kept attacking Obama when refuting Kulinski but Kulisnki is a Sanders supporter and Obama doesnt speak for every "Democrat"
Charlie kirk just wearing his yeezy 700s with a suit on stage💀
That bakari guy was a joke. His body expression throughout this whole panel showed how uninterested he was in debating and at 37:16 he had the gall to be texting on his phone
I thought that he was getting feedback on what to say. He had his phone there the entire time.
Yup. Being fed his replies. Or to avoid.
Typical. Can’t think for themselves.
@@Maxq1 No, its pure arrogance, he thinks he is the cool guy who is right, and the others , well their opinion doesn't matter. He showed that arrogance when that kid asked him a question as well.
This is Michael Knowles at his absolute best. Funny, interesting and entertaining with a good wit.
Best? He's a little smug shit face who loves the drama and wants to see the world burn.
@@AWlpsSHOW36 Fantastic comment! Factually exuberant and intriguinly statistical! Awe defying and eye capturing! So great in fact, that I want you to take your sorry bum back into primary school where you belong.
@@isaacchen1893
WTF mate? I didn't ask for your little comment. I didn't comment to be factual.
You're just pissed off that there are people like me who don't like Michael Knowles and don't appreciate his behaviour. He's smug and a dick and I can sense that he loves the conflict which is messed up.
Why don't you grow the hell up and quit worshipping him like he's this 'truthful factual' person.
@@AWlpsSHOW36 I'm not a leftist but I agree with you on Michael Knowles. Knowles's views are massively out of touch with the American people, for example he criticized Trump for firing neocon warmonger John Bolton, criticized Trump for the First Step Act, one of the best things Trump did and he praised Biden for the 1994 crime bill.
@@abrahamlincoln937
It's really a breath of fresh air to meet a person like you! I seriously don't understand how anyone can like and appreciate this asshole.
He's mostly just picking sides because he finds it amusing and sees politics as a game. He smiles and giggles when people clash and argue. He loves the division and wants to keep the country divided.
Like on here, he praises the death penalty and his love for it, then says he's pro-life.
And then the only reason why he's against legalizing Marijuana is because "It's a new leftist thing that we don't need"
He's basically just hates everything Left wing. He hates Liberals and instantly judges them before they get to ask him a question or say their opinion. He's a rude smug bully. And his freaking fanbase isn't any better. They are worse.
21:00 complete chaos on the panel, and Knowles goes, "Are we all getting along yet?" Hilarious.
underappreciated moment!
“That’s bullshit” *audience gives huge applause*
“Im pro life” *silence*
We all come to DW for Shapiro, but we stay for Knowles and Klavan.
Ben Shapiro should give Knowles a firm handshake for his time on this.
execrable
Why? Knowles looked like a fool up there.
@@realswagbetote did you watch the same video we did lol
Haha yeah I did. Kyle made him look like the elitist snob he is.
@@realswagbetote hahahahaha I think you have it backwards lol kyle was proven to be an average hypocritical leftist.
33:59
Charlie Kirk: "pssst, Hey Knowles, check out that hottie in the 3rd row."
Michael Knowles: nods approvingly.
😂😂😂
Too good. 😂😂
Noooo hahaha
They really needed Candace Owens on this panel, if for no other reason, to even out the numbers/sides. It is really clear Michael Knowles, everything else aside, is the smartest person on that stage.
Charlie: I'm enjoying being the quiet one on this panel.
Charlie 2 minutes later: VKLJBSWLIKNECVOIHEKJNI!
Michael Won When he smiled that first smirky smile about loving polarization. The lets all be friends changed real quick, as he triggered them, all while keeping that smile o on his face. ♡Knowles
His honesty destroys leftists feelings
Michael wins for being honest.
He really did, 4 sure, he cut out the small talk and was ready to slice through talking points!
what the fuck? He literally got exposed as a total hypocrite not even 20 minutes into the fucking video
@@legendarylitening By what, Kyle "simple refuted counter argument" Kulinski? Anyone who still thinks "pro-life" necessarily includes "anti-death penalty" understands neither.
@@audiorage82407 however someone can be both. Again the importance of correlation does not equal causation is incredibly important.
@@audiorage82407 We're not retarded, we all understand pro-life refers to abortion. It's the fact that the phrase pro life is hypocritical in the cases of many conservatives like knowles because they don't believe in the sanctity of life in all scenarios like the death penalty. This is the argument.
Don't forget that Michelle Knowles works with Ben Shapiro and Mat Walsh. They are dream team
The moment where Knowles corrected "Islamic sympathisers" had me in stitches 😂 😂
I really enjoy this moderator compared to most of the politicon moderators.
Or Clay Aiken?
That was just crazy!!!
He's a great moderator. Clay Aiken is trash as a moderator.
@Belly Dancer 👍
Juris Prudence Meh.
Michael Knowles was the best thing about this debate by far.
"I don't regret anything"... the motto of every narrsasistic person!
Didn't the White House already have "A man who looks like me" for 8 years?
"time-out, time-out" translates to "I'm losing the argument"
TRT VITOR No it translates to “Slow the fuck down, i either don’t agree with your premise, You brought up a bullshit stat, Your straw-manning or your making too many points at once “
Not used to seeing Knowles in debate scenarios, but I want it some more lol
He kicked ass in this debate.
He's my spirit animal dude, just awesome to watch
Watch the panel about comedy from politicos this year it’s him versus crazy leftist and he kills it!
chris olsen oh cool! Thanks for the tip
he literally got exposed immediate by kyle as a hypocrite
I like how Kirk and Kulinski formed a little bromance.
“We win, you lose.” Famous first words.
29:40 best moment of the video. If leftists try to cut you off just keep on talking. They can't talk over you if you don't let them.
I love Michael Knowles.
Damn straight. Lions do not concern themselves with the opinions of sheep - or of cockroaches
The hypocrite was so unaware that he angrily complained that Michael was interrupting him literally seconds later lol.
@@lilben4184 I'm a republican but let's not forget some people have different opinions and those opinions can change through learning
Democrats: "Bring the heat"
Michael Knowles: Spits LAVA
Charlie: "You don't even need me here"
No, Charlie tells the truth and pulls back the curtain on hypocrisy.
@@MrJamespeyton Yes, but on this panel he's overkill. Knowles is over here shooting fish in a barrel.
The second guy from the left is a complete dork.
The black guy
The cnn guy
Maya
But he thinks he’s so smart.
The girl was the most sensible one on the panel. Didn't interrupt, Articulated her points very well, and came from a reasonable point of view while also being pragmatic.
There's no compromise on issues that involves life ever.
We don't get along. In the words of Ronald Reagan :we win, they lose.
Except the truth of the matter is that when we win everyone wins . Even the people who are kicking and screaming . BTW .I'm talking about Reagan and Trump not the Bush presidents . They were Democrat light and Globalists .
"I'm pro due process", my boy Michael is sharp.
He did clarify "due process for citizens"
If you’re talking American citizens, there was only one: Hamdi. He eventually won in court but the govt’s take home lesson was “just fuckin kill em with drones”. Obama expanded that to “even if they’re American citizens” and afaik Trump is continuing the tradition.
It highlights very hard Kyle's misunderstanding of american exceptionalism.
@G G people are terrorist sympathizers these days and will continue to be so until they're the ones in the position of some deep shit. Seems to be the mentality of folks nowadays to overlook that. Some people even approve of accepting ISIS brides back into the country or having a radical sympathizer as an American Politician. 6 people agreed with his scoffing, I'm not surprised.
agentb Flinn theres a reason that part got booed.
Charlie's all respectful for like 20 minutes and proud of it, and then starts screaming his head off!😆
Michael K and Charlie K killing it!!
"How do we get along...we win and you lose" Michael Knowles is a BEAST!
@jon jones guess we saw different debates.
Ffs, when will we stop caring about who won the debate and who had better one-liners and rather who is actually smarter and right about more things. It was clearly Kyle here.
"We win you lose" is how America got to where it is today.
@@darcybhaiwala7057 spoken like a true Beta
@@culichi0776 And yet you listened
@@darcybhaiwala7057 I am kind like that. I listen to all including the weak.
Knowles stands and defends those with conservative values. And much as I like Lauren Chen she should boldly declare her position and not bother with cordiality masking her intellectual jugglery. The issue of abortion-like all issues-has shades but it is also black and white. Take a firm stand Lauren. It's life or death of the defenseless unborn. Kudos on Michael Knowles. He has balls.
Exactly!
Love to see you say the same for the innocent that are murdered on death row. You’re a Charlatan
+E V-It sounds to me like you're saying everyone on death row are innocent. And how does capital punishment compare with a society's conscious act to kill a defenceless human being who has not committed any crime? The individual on death row go through a judicial process which involves judgement by his peers. It's not a perfect system but to make it accomodate your particular sense of fair play is ludicrous especially because it is a system that protects and deters.
Thomas Woo you stupid there are people every year on death row that are innocent and executed and murdered by the state. No shit not everyone is not a criminal there. Bad oh please until the system is reformed no life should have to be accused and tried by a system looking for more god damn victims
@@ev99193 nobody argues that improvement could not take place in the criminal justice system but the death penalty killing an innocent is very rare because of the thoroughness of our courts. An extremely rare scenario does not work to disprove a necessary punishment for some of the worlds most disgusting people.
Knowles is correct. There is no room for compromise when absolute principles are at stake. It's all or nothing. So, we have to ask which political movement has moved the most over the last 25 years? It is the left. The right has remained firm on principle.
As far as the affirmative action subject, how about we just take away the check box and strictly look at one’s resume?
"We win you lose!" - Michael Knowles
jon jones Kyle was mostly in the defense, don’t ever put him in the same league as Michael .
luoi sant Kyle multiple times exposed michael knowles
Jack Radzelovage he was wrong and the hypocrisy was Hilarious. 😂😂
Didn’t knowles just get booted from Fox News? Hard thing to do considering they keep race baiter Tucker Carlson on air.
Jack Radzelovage ah you mad? Facts are facts🤷♂️
Jack Radzelovage
I know that trumps economy is slowing down.
I know we are increasing the deficit debt at at historic rate.
I know Trump asked for help from Ukraine. Which is illegal.
Want more dip shit?😂😂
Narrator: *They did not get along."
I love how they literally have no real arguments, so they just go to "what-about-isms". Also, notice how respectful Charlie and Micheal are when the idiots are speaking, and then when it's their turn to listen, they literally yell over those 2 gentlemen, just because they are making a good point and they don't want people to hear it.
Partisanship is our downfall. Either party "wins," the people lose. Why is policy and government no longer about the people but about stupid wedge issues?
Notice how when Michael is talking he gets talked over but when Mr When Negroes Don't Read talks everyone is respectful.
I knew I saw him somewhere. That's the guy that belittled Kanye.
I love how Michael asked if he can finish and the black guy said no and tried to steamroll him but mike said ok fuck it ill keep going anyway and beat him when it cames to over talking
That guy has a major chip on his shoulder.
He said he doesn't "Stand on the shoulders of Kanye." because Kanye doesn't read, but he "Stands on the shoulders of Treyvon Martin."
He's a liar. He's pissed because Kanye rejects to victim narrative.
You people are amazing. Michael had many moments where he spoke many times without interruption. Is there anything you all won’t spin?
They dont want to hear Knowles drop a truth bomb on them. However, when that guy said "when dont read" we wanted them to hear how stupid it sounds to normal people.
Charlie Kirk REKT the CNN guy on the topic of Kanye.
Annihilated. I seen the "Finish Him!" flash on the screen.
I remember when I applied for college 12 years ago, I ticked asian.
I was 2nd in my class, quite good SAT scores, captain of the bball team, vice president of the NHS and Student Council. And i didnt get into any colleges i applied for except 1. (I didnt apply for havard or those top school but definitely top 40 at the time)
I assumed it was as they said, "2008 was very competitive year" etc etc...
Knowing now that schools require a higher score for Asians than for my white and black classmates, I can't help but regret ticking that damn box.
(But hey, maybe my essay sucked, idk)
They bring in a commentator from CNN and hope that no one notices that The Daily Wire gets more audience than CNN
19:25 Charlie Kirk puts the pompous CNN guy into the ground. One of the best moments from politicon.
i'm still coming back to watch it, it's so satisfying
he actually explains his point later 21:27
21:58
like I didn't watch the whole thing already more than once
@@doh-nc8ku I mean it wasn't actually a point it was more of an insult toward kayne west , not reading doesn't make you less smart , kayne prefers to learn through converstaion and videos . Also for a guy on the left (The CNN guy) , saying people who can't read have bad opinions is kinda offensive toward dyslexics lmao .
The black guy is an embarrassment. Trump did get prison reform. You brought up Trayvon Martin, you lose all credibility.
Trayvon Martin's death is a clear example of self defense. But because he was a black kid, I guess it's only possible that he's a victim
Mike Roberts great point in this discussion I just ran onto.
The only embarrassment is Michael Knowles. Kulinski, not even a great debater, ran circles around him.
@@10003159 Knowles opposed the First Step Act.
Love or hate him but Kirk really does his homework.
"That's not what I said" proceeds to say exactly what he was accused of saying....-_-
"Im trying to move the conversation beyond "life"..." to things that really matter.
Gee...I guess that clarifies why the %$#& we can't get along.
The excrable Michael Knowles dominated politicon. Hilarious to watch the master troll at work.
Even the panel about pc comedy
Knowles is objectively terrible. He’s demonstrated himself as a partisan hack who contradicts himself constantly.
Everyone on that panel is a partisan you moron. You have democrats like that CNN guy and Kulinski and right wingers like Michael and Charlie and only person on that panel with actual consistent thought is roaming millennial
@Lightning4563 Being concise and specific on your positions is what you want in a politician and in politics period. Just as Knowles said in the panel I'd rather have people discussing politics and becoming politicians that genuinely know what they believe in and what their values are rather than people playing hot potato when they're pressed on an issue and just conceding a point rather than actually arguing based upon their own values.
Lightning4563 that would be an uninformed opinion from a dimwit liberal. You’ve spewed that with zero facts.
How do I become as smart as Michael Knowles?
God bless Kirk and Knowles. And God bless anti-abortion activists
Wow, leave it to Michael K. to hit the nail on the head as soon as he starts speaking. I completely agree, I love the polarization. It helps us conservatives to continue to beat down the left. #LeftistTears
Lmao Kyle sure beat down Michael K.
@@realswagbetote I wish Kyle would realize what due process what as well as what farms look like.
JK1389 K what a mature statement to make.
Having Charlie Kirk was just overkill
@Jason Salazar
Lol I‘m not a leftist but must be extremely in your right-wing bubble to really believe that Knowels was nailing it here. This guy is just insanely foolish and an utter partisan hack.
Guy second from left: "let's bring real issues." never brings a single one up himself, hypocrisy at its finest
Yeah, they talked about real issues the entire time. What he was basically saying was, "let's bring the issues I want."
The black guy, don't be scared to say it
Michael is the most mature person on the panel
As a girl I got super uncomfortable when the cnn guy said “sorry for mansplaining.” Then of course he cut her off later when she was talking about Kanye 🤦♀️
Knowles is loving every bit of the chaos and for that I am loving it as well.
Bakari is what happens when “people” don’t read.
Yup. An actual case of someone not reading.
EXACTLY. Everyone in this country has the freedom to be ignorant no matter their race!
If you want to know why Bakari Sellers is a “former” representative just watch the video.
Yup, very rude, inconsiderate, arrogant, narcissistic racist pretending to be an intellectual.
Today is April 6th 2024 and Michael Knowles was right.
"You're not pro-life 'cause you're for the death penalty." Wow...some real intellectual wizardry here, folks.
Exactly! It was such a stupid argument from Kyle
Its not kyles fault that Michael knowles viewpoints are so hilariously contradictory and simplistic that one sentence refutes it lol. You cannot consider yourself pro life if you support a system that you know leads to
The government murdering innocent citizens lives.
Matt it’s not intellectually dishonest. At least 4% of the Inmates put to death are innocents, if you’re okay with the government murdering innocent people just so you can kill actual criminals for your own sense of moral justice when locking them up for life would be cheaper then you just can’t objectively call yourself “prolife”, you’re killing innocents in order to kill more people. Think of it like this, you have 96 criminals you can have executed, but you can only kill them if you also kill 4 completely innocent lives as well. Would you kill those innocent people in order to get to
The criminals ? Or would you lock them? (which would also be cheaper option as well.)
john oboczky But they DO KNOW that they are killing innocent people, that’s why the analogy works . they may not know exactly which ones are innocent , but they know for a fact that a percentage of them are innocent and execute them anyway. That’s the entire point. I’d argue that you’re being intellectually dishonest by pretending this an argument over whether there are more innocent fetuses or more innocent people on death row when this argument is about being consistent with your “pro life” view and not being a hypocrite. The fact that michael knowles knows that innocent people are put to death but still literally professes his love for that system only makes him just more of hypocritical intellectual lightweight. Loving a system that you know kills innocent lives Is extremely antithetical to the entire concept of being “pro life” , it’s not pro life, it’s anti abortion.
john oboczky it absolutely is hypocritical , sorry you don’t like the proper use of the word but it fits. You’re making a false equivalence between letting in immigrants and directly killing people especially when there are alternatives to killing that are even cheaper than the death penalty .
When the crowd was booing the black guy he was shook😂
here it is 4 years later- and the world is SO MUCH WORSE than when this panel took place. - and all due to the kind of thinking of the 3 people on the left.
Thanks to Biden and his corrupt administration
Knowles did a good job here.
Gridlock in government is essential. In fact this was intentional by the founders.
In theory it works, but the problems arise when the gridlock suddenly slips and some bad policy slips through. Then the gridlock resumes and then we're stuck with the bad policy because the gridlock prevents anyone from repealing the bad policy. It also relies on each branch of government staying inside their assigned boundaries, like the legislature shouldn't just throw up their hands and say "We can't get anything done, let the executive deal with it." Or the judicial has to realize that they should not be setting up laws without the legislature. And finally, the legislature, as you say, is designed to keep much of anything from getting done, so they shouldn't vote an executive department into existence and then get mad when the department doesn't do what they want.
Agreed. The wheels of government move slowly so that it is not subject to the whims of popular opinion.
@@Praehotec Yep, that's the blueprint for the glacial-pace subversion of America - so slow hardly anyone can detect it happening! Unfortunately the founders didn't make the Constitution bulletproof and it's only a matter of time. America is already so far from originalism it's scary. The fact that there is even a debt based central bank and a federal income tax collection agency should have been enough to spark national outrage and possibly even armed resistance, but no, American's are too docile to defend the founding documents that created their nation. Sad.
@@djtim06 Lincoln and Jackson must be rolling over in horror at the current state of finance.
I hate the "if you are pro-life, how can you support the death penalty" argument. It is absolutely asinine as these are 2 completely separate issues. There is an immense difference between a gestating child in utero and a person convicted of committing a heinous crime. The death penalty is a punitive action which follows due process and the proper adjudication of a criminal trial. This is in no way comparable to the wanton execution of a developing child. Liberals and leftists make themselves look like complete idiots whenever they make this "gotcha" attempt.
Abortion isn't the execution of anything other than an unnecessary pregnancy.
+Dennis Bloodsworth
Pregnancy defines the act of what? - The development of a child during gestation.
Abortion defines the act of terminating or ending the development of a child during gestation.
If abortion is not the execution of anything, then how do you explain the outcome of avoiding an abortive operation?
What is an "unnecessary pregnancy"? And, on what basis do you determine that a pregnancy is "unnecessary"?
@@zion653 Pregnancy isn't necessarily an act. Its a process. Aborting the pregnancy isn't tantamount to murder. Why? Because there's tens of thousands of people who were once aborted. Guess what? They still exist. Are you going to sit there and tell me they were murdered? Would you really have me believe that? On what basis did I determine it was unnecessary? Easy. The woman in question does not want to take the pregnancy to term. She realizes that she is not at a stage in her life where motherhood is proper for her and she likely knows that the adoption centers are flooded with kids as is. It's also unnecessary because it's something sustainable. While successful reproduction is appropriate and necessary for the continuation of the human species, it's not necessary in every case for everyone.
@@zion653 And you are incorrect with that definition of abortion. The fetus will still develope if viable. The proper phrasing is it may or may not lead to the end of an unborn from developing.
Are you seriously contending that tens of thousands of people were aborted and, yet, still exist? How, exactly, do you come to that conclusion? An abortive procedure terminates a pregnancy and, therefore, terminates the gestation of a developing child - resulting in the death of a child. The only exception is in cases where the child survives the abortive procedure, which is rare; however, proponents of abortion actually support measures to allow the child to die should it survive the abortive operation, a measure which is exponentially heinous.
A woman's desire to end the life of a child by terminating her pregnancy does not trump the child's right to life. You do not have the right to end the life of another individual simply upon the basis that you find that individual to be inconvenient to your life.
If a woman considers that she is not at the proper moment in her life to begin motherhood, then there exists a plethora of preventive measures to avoid such a reality, including a myriad of contraceptives as well as abstinence. If you engage in a coital affair and become pregnant, you do not have the right to terminate the life of the resultant individual. Any individual who does this is using abortion as a failsafe form of contraception, an act which I find deplorable.
Adoption centers being "flooded" with children does not justify reasonably as a rationale for ending the life of the children.
Any individual who believes that reproduction in their case is not "appropriate and necessary" should take measures to ensure that reproduction does not occur. Being irresponsible in your behavior does not qualify as a rationale for the termination of a developing child.
All politics aside, the character of each individual speaks volumes.
Life is a good starting point if you don't care about life nothing else matters.
I think Charlie came across the best here. He was the most consistent in his principles and knowledgeable about policy history.
I agree Charlie was the best debater. Although I agreed with Michael on the D.P.
Knowles is killing me @ 50:30 "They probably be richer if they went to Harvard and Yale" 😂😂
Charlie was just overkill support
Knowles is the perfect blend of trollish wisdom and sharp wit
Every time dude on the left makes a point he gets nervous as hell & reaches for his water bottle lol
Michael Knowles is my favorite person in the political / podcast / public realm 😂 just the best